The Scoring Of America: How Secret Consumer Scores .

2y ago
19 Views
2 Downloads
946.02 KB
90 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Audrey Hope
Transcription

World Privacy ForumThe Scoring of America: HowSecret Consumer ScoresThreaten Your Privacy andYour FutureBy Pam Dixon and Robert GellmanApril 2, 2014

Brief Summary of ReportThis report highlights the unexpected problems that arise from new types of predictiveconsumer scoring, which this report terms consumer scoring. Largely unregulated eitherby the Fair Credit Reporting Act or the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, new consumerscores use thousands of pieces of information about consumers’ pasts to predict how theywill behave in the future. Issues of secrecy, fairness of underlying factors, use ofconsumer information such as race and ethnicity in predictive scores, accuracy, and theuptake in both use and ubiquity of these scores are key areas of focus.The report includes a roster of the types of consumer data used in predictive consumerscores today, as well as a roster of the consumer scores such as health risk scores,consumer prominence scores, identity and fraud scores, summarized credit statistics,among others. The report reviews the history of the credit score – which was secret fordecades until legislation mandated consumer access -- and urges close examination ofnew consumer scores for fairness and transparency in their factors, methods, andaccessibility to consumers.About the AuthorsPam Dixon is the founder and Executive Director of the World Privacy Forum. She is theauthor of eight books, hundreds of articles, and numerous privacy studies, including herlandmark Medical Identity Theft study and One Way Mirror Society study. She hastestified before Congress on consumer privacy issues as well as before federal agencies.Robert Gellman Robert Gellman is a privacy and information policy consultant inWashington DC. (www.bobgellman.com.) He has written extensively on health, deidentification, Fair Information Practices, and other privacy topics. Dixon and Gellman’swriting collaborations include a reference book on privacy Online Privacy: A ReferenceHandbook, as well as numerous and well-regarded privacy-focused research, articles, andpolicy analysis.About the World Privacy ForumThe World Privacy Forum is a non-profit public interest research and consumer educationgroup focused on the research and analysis of privacy-related issues. The Forum wasfounded in 2003 and has published significant privacy research and policy studies in thearea of health, online and technical, privacy, self-regulation, financial, identity, and databrokers among other many areas. www.worldprivacyforum.org.The Scoring of America, p. 2

RESTHREATENYOURPRIVACYANDYOURFUTURE.6INTRODUCTION . 6PARTI:SUMMARYANDBACKGROUND .7WHATISACONSUMERSCORE? . 8WHO HAS A SCORE? . ) . 9KeyIssue:ScoreSecrecy. 11KeyIssue:ScoreAccuracy . 12KeyIssue:IdentityTheftandConsumerScoring . 13KeyIssue:UnfairnessandDiscrimination . ndConsumerScoring. Scores. 15SCORESTHEN:AHANDFULOFFACTORS. SCORESNOW:THOUSANDSOFFACTORS . 15SCORINGMETHODSANDMODELSAREOPAQUE . 18EXAMPLESANDNUMBERSOFCONSUMERSCORES . LITY . 19DEJA VU: WHY THE HISTORY OF THE CREDIT SCORE IS IMPORTANT . 21SUMMARYOFFINDINGSANDRECOMMENDATIONS . 23Findings: . 23Recommendations:. 24ADVICEFORCONSUMERS:. YAREMADE. 27DEFININGCONSUMERSCORESMOREDEEPLY . ONGETSPUTINTOACONSUMERSCORE? . 30TRADITIONALSCOREINGREDIENTS:CREDITSCORES . 30MODERNSCORE- E . S. 33Demographic Information: . 33ContactInformation:. 34Vehicles: . dical):. 34FinancialandEconomic–PropertyandAssetsdata: . 36FinancialandCreditdata: . O . 38ALGORITHM,INC. . 38LAYERINGSCORINGMODELS . 40HOWMANYVARIABLES? . 41POLICYQUESTIONS . 41PARTIII.THECONSUMERSCORES . 42The Scoring of America, p. 3

CATEGORY:FINANCIALANDRISKSCORES . 43ChoiceScore . s). 44RiskIQScore . 45ConsumerProfitabilityScore. 45JobSecurityScore . 47ConsumerProminenceIndicatorScore. 47DiscretionarySpendingIndexScore. 48InvitationtoApplyScore. 48CharitableDonorScore. saic,etc.). 50CollectionandRecoveryScores . 50ChurnScores . 51CATEGORY:FRAUDSCORES . 52FICOFalconFraudManager. 53OtherFraudScores . 54CATEGORY:CUSTOMSCORES . orScoreExample . 55CATEGORY: REGULATED CREDIT AND FINANCIAL SCORES . 57FICOScore. 58VantageScore . 58BeaconScore. 59SmallBusinessIntelliscore . 59TenantScores . 60CATEGORY:IDENTITYANDAUTHENTICATIONSCORES . 60IDAnalyticsIDScore. 60InsuranceScores . 61Category- - HealthScores. 61AffordableCareActIndividualHealthRiskScore. 62FICOMedicationAdherenceScore(MAS) . 63FrailtyScores:General . 65CMSFrailtyAdjustmentScore. 66HopkinsFrailtyScore. 66OtherHealthScores . 66PersonalHealthScores:WebMD,others . 67ResourceUtilizationGroupScores. 68SF- 36Form . 69ComplexityScores. 69CATEGORY–SMARTGRIDANDENERGYSCORES. 70Peer- to- PeerEnergyPeopleMeterScore(EPM). 70CATEGORY- ‐SOCIALSCORING . 72KloutScore. 73EmploymentSuccessScore. 75TAXRETURNSCORES . TRANSPORTATION,SAFETY,ANDOTHER . 76AutomatedTargetingSystemScore . 76RichardBerkAlgorithm. 77YouthDelinquencyScores. 77PredictiveAnti- l. 77The Scoring of America, p. 4

CATEGORY- ‐- ‐ENVIRONMENTALSCORES . 78EPAHealthRiskScore . 78AIQGreen . 79CATEGORY- ‐OTHERCONSUMERSCORES . 79PotentialScores. 80Non- includedScores:. ONSUMERSCORESBEGAN,ANDWHYITISRELEVANTTODAY. 80THEBEGINNINGSOFCONSUMERSCORING . 80CREDITSCORINGBECOMESENTRENCHED . THEPUBLIC . SUMERCREDITSCORES . 83CONCLUSION . 84ABOUTTHISREPORTANDCREDITS . 86APPENDIXA . 87TIMELINE: HIGHLIGHTS IN SCORING . 87APPENDIXB . 89SCORE TAXONOMY . 89The Scoring of America, p. 5

April 2, 2014 Pam Dixon and Robert GellmanThe Scoring of America:How secret consumer scores threaten yourprivacy and your futureIntroductionTo score is human. Ranking individuals by grades and other performance numbers is asold as human society. Consumer scores — numbers given to individuals to describe orpredict their characteristics, habits, or predilections — are a modern day numericshorthand that ranks, separates, sifts, and otherwise categorizes individuals and alsopredicts their potential future actions.Consumer scores abound today. Credit scores based on credit files receive much publicattention, but many more types of consumer scores exist. They are used widely to predictbehaviors like, spending, health, fraud, profitability, and much more. These scores rely onpetabytes of information coming from newly available data streams. The information canbe derived from many data sources and can contain financial, demographic, ethnic, racial,health, social, and other data.The Consumer Profitability Score, Individual Health Risk Score, Summarized CreditStatistics that score a neighborhood for financial risk, fraud scores, and many others seekto predict how consumers will behave based on their past behavior and characteristics.Predictive scores bring varying benefits and drawbacks. Scores can be correct, or theycan be wrong or misleading. Consumer scores – created by either the government or theprivate sector – threaten privacy, fairness, and due process because scores, particularlyopaque scores with unknown ingredients or factors, can too easily evade the rulesestablished to protect consumers.The most salient feature of modern consumer scores is the scores are typically secret insome way. The existence of the score itself, its uses, the underlying factors, data sources,or even the score range may be hidden. Consumer scores with secret factors, secretThe Scoring of America, p. 6

sources, and secret algorithms can be obnoxious, unaccountable, untrustworthy, andunauditable. Secret scores can be wrong, but no one may be able to find out that they arewrong or what the truth is. Secret scores can hide discrimination, unfairness, andbias. Trade secrets have a place, but secrecy that hides racism, denies due process,undermines pri

Apr 02, 2014 · The most salient feature of modern consumer scores is the scores are typically secret in some way. The existence of the score itself, its uses, the underlying factors, data sources, or even the score range may be hidden. Consumer scores with

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

IAAF SCORING TABLES OF ATHLETICS / IAAF TABLES DE COTATION D’ATHLETISME VI AUTHORS’ INTRODUCTION The Scoring Tables of Athletics are based on exact statistical data and according to the following principles: The scores in the tables of different events cover equivalent performances. Therefore, the tables can beFile Size: 2MBPage Count: 368Explore furtherIAAF Scoring Calculatorcaltaf.comIAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics 2017ekjl.eeIAAF Scoring Tables for Combined Eventswww.rfea.esIAAF scoring tables updated for 2017 Newswww.worldathletics.orgstatistics - How to calculate IAAF points? - Sports Stack .sports.stackexchange.comRecommended to you b

Common Lead Scoring Issues 38 The Problems with BANT 39 Improving Data Capture with Forms 40 Part Seven Content Marketing, Social Media and Lead Scoring 42 Content Marketing and Lead Scoring 43 Social Media and Lead Scoring 44 Part Eight The ROI of Lead Scoring 46 Calculating the ROI of Lead Scoring 47 Decrease in Sales Cycle Duration 48