MOTIVATION AND PERSONALITY MODEL AS A

2y ago
40 Views
2 Downloads
275.47 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 2d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Dahlia Ryals
Transcription

The Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (eLearning-2015), 24-25September 2015, Belgrade, SerbiaMOTIVATION AND PERSONALITY MODEL AS A REPRESENTATIVE FACTOR OF STUDENTS’STUDYING HABITSVITOMIR RADOSAVLJEVIĆICT College of Vocational Studies in Belgrade, Serbia, vitomir.radosavljevic@ict.edu.rsGORDANA JELIĆICT College of Vocational Studies in Belgrade, Serbia, gordana.jelic@ict.edu.rsSLAVICA ŠTRBACICT College of Vocational Studies in Belgrade, Serbia, slavica.strbac@ict.edu.rsAbstract: In this paper we present the results of one part of a research which was to determine studying habits ofstudents in the studying process. The findings obtained in research were to be used for enhancing the effects ofstudying, especially the ones realized through educational platforms. The research tested correlation betweenpersonality traits and motivation in a learning process. In this research, ’Big Five’ was used as a personality model.The results showed that there is correlation between personality traits and motivation, but not all personality traitsaffect motivation in the same way and with the same strength. The research was conducted at the ICT College ofVocational Studies in Belgrade on 92 students, and gave some conclusions that were useful in further research ofstudents’ studying habits.Keywords: Big Five, personality traits, adaptive learning, motivation1. INTRODUCTIONEducational process and personal development arenowadays considered to be one of the basic elements ofour society and the foundation for society improvementand development. Having this in mind, study approachesare being developed which will improve the quality ofstudying and which will define standards for moreefficient and effective learning process. In order toexplore better parameters which influence the learningprocess there was a survey conducted at the ICT Collegeof Vocational Studies in Belgrade. The aim of theresearch was to ascertain the studying habits of studentsThe research presented in this paper is only theintroductory part of a bigger research project where wewant to ascertain the studying habits of students in thestudying process and to use them for enhancing theeffects of studying, especially the ones realized througheducational platforms. The problem was presented andanalyzed in the next chapter and it was the starting pointof the research. In the third chapter the research wasdescribed in its last phase at the end of 2014. In the fourthChapter the research results and their analyses are given,while the research conclusion was shown in the lastchapter.2. DESCRIBING LEARNERThe way how new technologies are going to be appliedand developed in the studying process depends onfindings and scientific facts from the wide range ofscience fields such as psychology, pedagogy, HumanComputer Interaction, medicine. The aim is to usetechnology in favor of a user and by use of this newtechnological elements to enhance the studying processonto a new level. Studying should be effective, efficient,adapted to users needs, and the quality of knowledgeobtained good. In addition, a student has to be motivatedfor studying, and the system should be designed torecognize the best possible way qualities of an individual,which are important for the studying process [2] as well togive him the subjective feeling of satisfaction while usingthe system. [4].Motivation is the factor which stimulates the activities ofan individual: influences certain behavior, and keeps itgoing and directing towards a certain goal. Motivationplays a very important role in education and influencesstudents in many different ways. It can influence thegrowth of invested work and energy of a student whilestudying materials, it can provoke some creative thinkingin the fields of study, and at the same time it can initiatecertain activities concerning the materials and that wayenhance the cognitive studying processes and the wholestudy performances [5].We can observe the motivation within two aspects. Wecan speak about intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.The intrinsic motivation is the one that comes from theperson itself and it causes the action. It results from theurge of a person to feel the personal satisfaction andfulfillment due to performed activity (for exampleacquired materials or performed tasks). The intrinsicmotivation is very often described as something anindividual does without direct inducement. In educationstudents with high intrinsic motivation achieve top resultsin learning. Good intrinsic motivation leads to highquality knowledge [6]. Students go deeper into studymaterials and have a more creative approach. There is astrong wish to overcome problems by studying andconnecting acquirement with other accomplishments.

Factors which have a positive impact on increasing theintrinsic motivation are challenges in studying, curiosity,need to understand environment, developed imagination,competitive and team spirit, need to get approval andacknowledgement. People with strong intrinsic motivationneed intellectual stimulation and are enthusiastic aboutstudying [3]. The feeling of inner satisfaction motivatesthem to study and work.Extrinsic motivation is a kind of motivation which causesactivity due to extrinsic influences on a person. Takenactions aim to achieve results which will be regarded asan award (during the study process it is an adequategrade) or help to escape punishment [9]. This type ofstudents motivation makes them study to get an adequatereward (good grade or to pass an exam) and not becausethey want to obtain new accomplishments. People, whobelong to this group of extrinsic motivated students,study to achieve certain goals and given goals are theirmain resource of motivation. This way obtainedknowledge is not combined with other accomplishments,and as soon as the motive was established (an exampassed or good grade obtained) there is no furthermotivation to remember the study materials and/or extendthem. People without motivation do not respond toextrinsic medium influences [7].In the process of e-learning intrinsic motivation plays animportant role. Environment in which a student followse-courses differs fundamentally from face-to-faceenvironment. In face-to-face environment a teacher is in adirect contact with students and influences the speed andway he/she manages the class. Depending on the currentstudents motivation the teacher can adapt a lecturedynamic or a lesson or can choose some other ways tomotivate students in order to obtain better results in theirwork. The motivation given by the teacher is a factor ofan extrinsic motivation. It has its positive effects whenstudents concentration and working energy diminishes.In e-learning the student has to improve his ownmotivation when his motivation for work and learninglowers. Interface used in e-learning should increase theuser s motivation [30].To get the information about the motivation of the elearning user it is necessary to analyze the user s behaviorduring the process of adopting study materials which areinitially not understandable and are described as difficultto understand. Apart from that, the chosen criteria by theuser saying which study materials are going to be studiedcan show the state of intrinsic motivation.The research has been pointed towards establishingconnection between studying motivation and personalitymodel. The personality model which has been dominantin the sphere of personality psychology in the few lastyears and which is used to describe personality is socalled Five Factor Model – FFM or the model ‘Big Five’,which describes individual traits by an acronym OCEAN.According to that model personality can be described byfive traits: Openness –O, Conscientiousness – C,Extraversion - E, Agreeableness – A and Neuroticism –N. The authors of this model assume that the mostimportant dimensions of personality are universal andunchangeable and that they are shown consequently indifferent samples, analyses procedures, cultures. Thisfive main traits are called domains and present a group ofdifferent cognitive, affective and behavioral dimensionswhich can be grouped differently. Facets represent thehierarchically lower traits which define the domain. Theadvantages of this model are its empirical foundation andconceptual apprehensiveness [11].The number of researches using the model Big Five toestablish connection between the personality type andstyle of learning is growing every day. The research of LiFang Zahn [15] gave two hypotheses which have given usthe answer based on certain personality traits: whatapproach have students got towards studying: frivolous orthorough and efficient. According the first hypothesis,students with a higher neuroticism factor (N) performtasks with more difficulty when they just have to repeatthe study materials and when they do not want to godeeper into the core of the learned materials. The secondhypothesis stands for attitude that people more apt toopenness [O], extraversion (E) and conscientiousness (C)have thorough approach towards materials that have to belearnt and go deeper into the matter. Data analysis hasconfirmed that Big Five can, to certain extent, anticipatewhich study approach a person will have.Conscientiousness (C) and openness[O] are twopersonality traits which have given the best predictionsabout the study approach, whereas agreeableness (A)anticipates which study approach is not achievementoriented, and extraversion (E) does not give any distinctcorrelation[15].In one older research [12] they were looking forconnection between personality traits following the FiveBig criteria and learning style. In this research they havepresented the four studying styles: meaning directed,reproduction directed, application directed and undirectedstyle. According to Vermunt [18], undirected learningstyle characterizes student s inability to differ importanttheses from less important ones. Student reads materialseven a couple of times and at the same time he feels theload from the quantity of materials he has to study andfeels insecure in obtaining his academic achievements.Studying which is directed by reproduction is based onmemorizing data and analyzing them to achieveappropriate academic demands, allowing the instructor orteacher to lead them through learning materials and theyare mostly motivated by extrinsic factors such as passingan exam, getting a certificate or grade. Applicationdirected studying is a characteristic of those studentswhose motivation factors are coming from inside as wellfrom outside, but they also possess intrinsic motivationfor studying. Intrinsic motivation comes out of cognitionthat obtained knowledge can bepractically used.Application directed studying is typical for those who aresystematic in their studying process and have a plan andstrategy how to obtain certain knowledge and they showpersonal interest for studying [16]. We can draw a parallelbetween the Big Five and Vermunt s categorization oflearning styles. It is deduced that there is a correlationamong extrinsic and directed studying, studying by

reproduction and application directed studying. Opennessis in correlation with directed oriented and applicationoriented studying. Neuroticism is correlated with freelearning style and has negative effect on oral style andreproduction oriented studying. Agreeableness [A] is incorrelation with reproduction and application orientedstudying. This research has shown that extraversion is ina positive correlation with directed learning, reproductionand application oriented learning. Conscientiousness Chas influenced positivelydirect, reproduction andapplication oriented learning, and negatively freelearning. Openness was in a positive correlation withdirected and application oriented learning and in negativecorrelation with free learning. Neuroticism is in positivecorrelation with free learning and in negative bleness [A] has got a positive influence onreproduction and application oriented learning [12].3. RESEARCH DESCRIPTIONDuring the November 2014 the research was conductedwith a goal to find out some of the students learninghabits at the ICT College of Vocational Studies inBelgrade. This study is a part of a bigger research projectwhere some additional researches with the same goal havebeen planned. Findings collected within the project shouldgive us some information about students habits duringthe studying process. The research topic was examiningthe students personality model according the Big Fiverole-model and discovering the connection among certainaspects of personality domains with students studyinghabits during the studying process.The research was done on the specimen of 93 examinedstudents, who are the second year students at the ICTCollege of Vocational Studies in Belgrade studying one ns, Postal Banking technologies andInternet technologies). The most participants (89%) areaged 18 to 23. The research data have been collected bythe questionnaire where the students were answering thewhole set of questions. The questionnaire had 40questions. 24 questions were dealing with personalitytraits following the role-model the Big Five and studentscould answer using the five grade scale from 1 to 5,where 1 stood for ‘I absolutely disagree’, 2 for ‘ I do notagree’, 3 for ‘not oriented’, 4 for ‘ yes, I agree’ and 5for ‘ I absolutely agree’. The remaining questions werethere to determine age structure of examined students,their study programme, the degree of computer literacy,the time quantity each examined student spends usingcomputer and to what purposes. The students were fillingin the questionnaire form on the social network Facebookusing the application ‘My surveys’. In order to analyse thestudents motivation a question was asked: what criteriado you use to choose what is to be learnt? As an answerto that question there were 5 options: ‘ I study only thosematerials which are necessary to pass my exam; I studyonly those materials I find interesting; I study materialswhich will develop my intellectual and creative abilities; Istudy materials which have practical use. Students wereoffered to answer this question with more than oneanswer. Besides the given question, which was supposedto give insight into motivating factors of students, wewere looking for one more answer.The stress was also put on the second question in thisquestionnaire ‘The lessons I have to study but they aredifficult to understand’. The answers were: ‘I skip themand I do not study them; They are real challenge for me; Iam trying to learn them but I ask for extra help of myteacher or colleagues; I am trying to learn them with ahelp of additional information on the Internet. Studentscould answer this question using more than one answer.Obtained results of this research werestatistically elaborated with a goal to establish the degreeof internal consistency and data reliability within theresearch. For that purpose we have used Cronbach s alphacoefficient. Obtained results of alpha coefficient whichwere above 0.6 explain the research results as a systemwith acceptable internal consistency, while the resultsabove 0.7 show a system with a good internal consistency[29].4. RESEARCH RESULTSThe research results have been grouped according to thedomains and facets whichhave given the mostdistinguished correlations between motivation andpersonal traits.Facet of personality from the domain of openness whichis shown through the attitude ‘I make my decisionscautiously with a lot of thinking’ has given us twoconclusions. The first applies to the facet of how studentssolve the problems of lessons which are difficult tounderstand. According to it, the less that facet is presentamong students, the more they rely on help of a teacher orcolleagues to solve the problem. Opposite to it, the morethat facet is shown, students are more independent infinding solutions for learning materials which are moredifficult to adopt and they use the Internet more, in orderto find extra information to understand better the learningmaterials.Image 1:. ‘I make my decisions cautiously with a lot ofthinking’ facet of personality analysisPersonality facet from the domain of openness which isshown by the attitude ‘I have very developed imagination’has given us the following conclusion. Students with lessdeveloped imagination search for extrinsic factors as theirstudy motivation (such as to pass an exam), whereas theirintrinsic motivation is less pointed out. Personality facet

from the domain openness which applies to students creativity shows that although the level of intrinsicmotivation is good, it is necessary additionally tomotivate creative students to use teaching materials,which are far away from their interest s sphere.The personality facet from the domain ofconscientiousness, which is pointed out through verygood personal organization, has given us the followingconclusion. Well organized students will use the Internetmore often as a source of information necessary foradopting difficult lessons rather than help of a teacher orcolleagues. Also, the intrinsic motivation is much morevisible with well organized students than with lessorganized students. In the domain of conscientiousnessthere is a personality facet concerning the students diligence. Students who consider themselves hardworkingand diligent need less extrinsic motivation.Image 3: ‘I consider myself to be a very good organisedperson’ facet of personality analysis5. CONCLUSIONThis research was supposed to establish the existingconnections among the personal traits following the ‘BigFive’ model and certain studying habits which wouldshow us the motivation source for studying and the waythe students tend to solve more difficult learningmaterials. The main conclusion is that this connectionexists, but that all personality facets do not show at thesame extent the connection of mentioned factors.Image 2:. ‘I have very developed imagination’ facet ofpersonality analysisPersonality facet from the extroversion domain where thestudents had judged themselves as energetic persons haveshown that students who feel they are energetic havestronger intrinsic motivation. The questioned studentswho had described themselves as medium or hardlyadventures personality type demand higher level of extramotivation for studying. Analyzing the neuroticismdomain the emotional facet stands out. Students who haddescribed themselves as very emotional and mediumemotional personalities need less extrinsic factors in orderto increase their working motivation compared withstudents who had described themselves as less emotional.In addition, during the studying process more emotionalstudents were in higher percentage asking help of ateacher to manage the more difficult lessons compared toless emotional students.Personality facet from the domain of agreeablenessexpressed by attitude: ‘I consider myself to be a veryfriendly person’ has shown that students with a lessdeveloped facet have got higher extrinsic motivationcomparedwith those whose facet has been onlymoderately shown. Students who had judged themselvesas friendly persons will ask teachers help in higherpercentage in managing difficult lessons compared withstudents who had described themselves as moderatelyfriendly.Personality facet from the domain Openness (which isshown by students developed imagination) andagreeableness (a student describes him as a friendlyperson) have given the best results of dependencebetween the personality traits and degree of intrinsicmotivation. Facets can additionally be understood as aconfirmation of existing connections among motivationand certain personality traits from the domain ofconscientiousness (facet which describes person ashardworking), while the influence shown throughextroversion ( a personality facet showing how energetic aperson is) and neuroticism ( emotional facet of a

personality traits and motivation in a learning process. In this research, ’Big Five’ was used as a personality model. The results showed that there is correlation between personality traits and motivation, but not all personality traits affect motivation in the same way and with the

Related Documents:

to other personality disorders such as antisocial personality disorder. Ogloff (2005) distinguishes psychopathy from antisocial personality disorder due to the emphasis on affective and personality rather than mostly behavioral elements of antisocial personality disorder. Besides antisocial personality disorder, there are other DSM-IV personality

Understanding The Supporter Personality Chapter 5: Understanding The Promoting/Supporter Personality Chapter 6: Understanding The Promoter/Controller Personality Chapter 7: Understanding The Controller/Analyzer Personality Chapter 8 : Understanding The Analyzer/Supporter Personality Chapter 9: Understanding The Centric Personality Wrapping Up

Unit 7 - Motivation, Emotion, and Personality From Simple Studies, https://simplestudies.edublogs.org & @simplestudiesinc on Instagram Summary There are many different theories about motivation, emotion, and personality. Motivation Feelings or ideas that cause someone to go towards a goal Theories of

The WPS personality assessment test measures twenty personality dimensions covering the Big Five personality factors. The questionnaire also provides a measure of the General Factor of Personality (GFP). Figure 1 illustrates the WPS concept model, and Figure 2 shows the twenty facets of personality that the test measures. Table 1 provides summary

Personality Inventory was used. Data analyses were performed in two major stages. First, factor analysis of health-relevant personality instruments was conducted. The results of these analyses indicated that . fundamental domains of personality derived from basic personality research (Digman, 1990). METHOD Subjects

personality and a archetype. Part of personality: The shadow is the dark side of your personality that contains the animal (and sexual) instincts. It is the opposite of the Persona (mask) and is the part of personality that is repressed from the ego ideal. As archetype: The importance of the

the light of sound theoretical systems of personality. 3. To acquaint the students with the applications of personality theories in different walks of life. Unit Contents No. of Lectures Unit-I INTRODUCTION TO PERSONALITY 1.1.Definitions and nature of personality 1.2.Characteristics of good personality theory and Evaluation of personality theory

playing field within the internal market, even in exceptional economic circumstances. This White Paper intends to launch a broad discussion with Member States, other European institutions, all stakeholders, including industry, social partners, civil society organisations,