Professor David Greenaway Registrar's Department Portland .

2y ago
20 Views
2 Downloads
301.78 KB
7 Pages
Last View : 11d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Brady Himes
Transcription

Professor David GreenawayVice-ChancellorThe University of NottinghamRegistrar's DepartmentPortland Building E Floor, University ParkNOTTINGHAMNG7 2RD21 September 2012Dear Professor Greenaway,First Annual LetterI am writing to you in connection with the changes to publication arrangements, approved by the OIABoard at its December 2011 Meeting, and set out in the Guidance Note and revised Scheme Rulespublished on the OIA website in February 2012. The purpose of the changes in the Rules is toincrease the transparency of complaints handling in universities in England and Wales in line withgood practice in other sectors, and to increase complainant confidence in the integrity of the process.You should find the enclosed information, which The University of Nottingham has had theopportunity to check, useful when reviewing the University’s record in handling complaints.1Explanatory notes and relevant definitions are set out in Annexe 2. A copy of this letter will bepublished on the OIA website, together with letters to all other Scheme members, on 25 September2012.I hope this is helpful.Yours sincerely,Rob BehrensIndependent Adjudicator & Chief Executive1The word complaint also includes academic appeals.Page 1 of 7‘for students in higher education’Registered & Postal Address: Third Floor, Kings Reach, 38-50 Kings Road, Reading, RG1 3AA, United Kingdomwww.oiahe.org.uk enquiries@oiahe.org.uk Tel: 0118 959 9813Independent Adjudicator & Chief Executive – Robert BehrensThe OIA is a charity, registered in England & Wales under number 1141289, and a company limited by guarantee, registered in England & Walesunder number 4823842.

Annexe 1STATISTICSAnnual Complaints to the OIA2The University of NottinghamYearOIA Band20112010GGNumber ofstudents3292531830Completion of Procedures Lettersissued dated201123201013Annual ChangeIncreased by 1020112010Complaintsreceived at the OIA2211Complaints closed3at the OIA168Annual ChangeIncreased by 11Increased by 8YearOf theseCompletion ofProceduresLetters issuedthe OIA receivedthe following:Complaints received at the OIA with Completion ofProcedures Letters dated201117201015Annual ChangeIncreased by 2The University of Nottingham has informed the OIA that 23 students were issued with a Completionof Procedures Letter in 2011. The OIA received 17 complaints from The University of Nottinghamstudents with Completion of Procedures Letters dated 2011. This means that about one in everyone-and-a-half students who exhausted the formal internal complaints procedures at The Universityof Nottingham brought their complaint to the OIA. By way of comparison, the average proportion ofcomplaints brought to the OIA from universities in the same band was one in every seven studentswho had complained. Chart 1 below gives the comparison between the returns from The University ofNottingham and the band averages.Chart 1Institutional record compared to the band .81622.70Completion of ProceduresLetters issued dated 2011Complaints received at the OIA Complaints received at the OIA Complaints closed at the OIA inwith Completion of Proceduresin 20112011Letters dated 2011The University of Nottingham2Band averageThe figures under headings "Complaints received at the OIA" and "Complaints received at the OIA with Completion ofProcedures Letters dated [year]" may relate to the same complaints. This means that some complaints might be counted underboth headings. The figures under these headings should therefore not be added together.3Some of the complaints might have been received in the previous year.Page 2 of 7

The number of Completion of Procedures Letters issued by a university, and/or the number ofcomplaints received at the OIA from that university are not of themselves an indication of good orless good practice, and contextualisation is important. In general, the number of complaints receivedat the OIA is related to the number of enrolled students at the university, but there are exceptions tothis trend.The OIA closed 16 complaints against The University of Nottingham in 2011. Chart 2 below displaysthe outcome of the closed complaints and compares The University of Nottingham figures to those ofthe band average.Chart 2Complaints closed by outcome (2011)1412.8121010864.242.1221.511.01111.10Not EligibleJustifiedPartly JustifiedThe University of NottinghamNot JustifiedSettledSuspended orWithdrawnBand averageChart 3 below categorises the complaints closed by subject matter. It displays what proportion ofcomplaints closed about The University of Nottingham was attributable to each category. Chart 4illustrates what proportion of the total number of complaints closed about all universities in 2011 wasattributable to each category. The number of complaints in each category that the OIA received iscontained in brackets.Page 3 of 7

Complaints closed by subject matter (2011)Academic StatusAcademic misconduct including plagiarism and cheatingDiscrimination and Human RightsWelfare and AccommodationAdmissionsServices issues (Contract)Disciplinary mattersFinancialOtherChart 3The University of NottinghamChart 4Proportion of the total number ofcomplaints received at the OIA (1)69%(11)Page 4 of 72% 1%2% (28)(14)3%(33)(43)70%(1007)

Annexe 2EXPLANATORY NOTESNote 1Under Scheme Rule 4.1 the OIA has the discretion, exceptionally, to reviewcomplaints even where the internal complaints procedures have not beenexhausted. For statistical purposes, we treat such complainants as havingexhausted the relevant procedures.Note 2Student numbers were obtained from Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) www.hesa.ac.uk. 2007/2008 HESA figures were used to assign universities to therelevant OIA subscription band in 2010 and 2008/2009 figures in 2011.Note 3The heading ‘Complaints received at the OIA in 2011’ includes all complaints wherethe OIA Complaint Form was received at the OIA during 2011. It also includes NotEligible complaints. By contrast, ‘Complaints received at the OIA with Completion ofProcedures Letters dated 2011’ includes only complaints received at the OIA withCompletion of Procedures Letters dated 2011, whenever received. For example, acomplaint may have been received in 2012 but with the Completion of ProceduresLetter dated 2011. The example given also applies to 2010 statistics.Note 4In this exercise, bands G, H and I are merged for the purposes of calculating bandaverages for universities in those bands. This enabled the OIA to provide moremeaningful contextual information where numbers of institutions in bands aresmall.Note 5The heading ‘OIA Band’ refers to OIA subscription bands which are as follows:Institution sizePage 5 of 7BandLess than 500 studentsA501 to 1,500 studentsB1,501 to 6,000 studentsC6,001 to 12,000 studentsD12,001 20,000 studentsE20,001 30,000 studentsF30,001 50,000 studentsG50,001 100,000 studentsHMore than 100,000 studentsI

DEFINITIONSCompletion of Procedures Letter – Once a student has exhausted the university's internalcomplaints or appeals procedures, the university must promptly send the student aCompletion of Procedures Letter. In line with published Guidance, this letter should set outclearly what issues have been considered and the university's final decision. This letterdirects the student to the OIA.Justified/Partly Justified/Not Justified – At the end of the OIA review process we will decidewhether a student’s complaint about the university is Justified, Partly Justified or NotJustified.Not Eligible complaint – This is a complaint that we cannot review under our Rules.Settled complaint - Once a complaint is received by the OIA and the University has beennotified, a complaint will be considered “settled” where the parties to the complaint reach anagreed outcome prior to the OIA issuing a Formal Decision.Suspended complaint - A case may be suspended, normally at the request of a complainant,in exceptional circumstances e.g. bereavement or illness. Cases may also be suspended ifthere is on-going action taking place in another forum which could affect the outcome of theOIA’s review e.g. secondary procedures taking place within the University.University – For ease of reference, we use the word ‘university’ throughout the letter toinclude all institutions subscribing to the OIA Scheme.Withdrawn complaint - A complaint will be considered “withdrawn” if a complainant requeststhat the OIA cease to review the complaint or in cases where the complainant fails toparticipate in the OIA’s process.CATEGORIES OF COMPLAINTSAcademic Status - complaints which are related to academic appeals, assessments,progression and grades.Service Issues (contract) - complaints which are related to the course or teaching provision,facilities and supervision.Disciplinary matters - complaints which are related to disciplinary proceedings for nonacademic offences.Academic Misconduct - complaints which are related to academic offences includingplagiarism, collusion and examination offences.Discrimination and Human Rights - complaints where the student claims there has been anyform of discrimination, including harassment, and where he or she claims his or her HumanRights have been breached.Page 6 of 7

Financial - complaints relating to finance and funding: e.g. fees and fee status, bursaries andscholarships.Welfare and Accommodation - complaints relating to support services, e.g. counselling,chaplaincy, assistance for international students, and university accommodation issues.21 September 2012Page 7 of 7

Professor David Greenaway Vice-Chancellor The University of Nottingham Registrar's Department Portland Building E Floor, University Park NOTTINGHAM NG7 2RD 21 September 2012 Dear Professor Greenaway, First Annual Letter I am writing to you in connection with the cha

Related Documents:

Professor David Greenaway Vice-Chancellor The University of Nottingham Registrar's Department University Park NOTTINGHAM NG7 2RD 23 July 2014 Dear Professor Greenaway, Annual Letter I enclose the OIA Annual Letter for your institution for 2013. This documents the Un

Bellamy Young Ben Feldman Ben McKenzie Ben Stiller Ben Whishaw Beth Grant Bethany Mota Betty White Bill Nighy Bill Pullman Billie Joe Armstrong Bingbing Li Blair Underwood . David Koechner David Kross David Letterman David Lyons David Mamet David Mazouz David Morrissey David Morse David Oyelowo David Schwimmer David Suchet David Tennant David .

Steve Edwards; Professor Peter Ellis; Professor Nicholas Hamlyn; Professor David Steinsaltz; Professor James Montgomery; Professor Mark Hindmarsh; Professor Joseph Phelan; Professor Gavin Davies; Professor Cahal Mclaughlin; Professor Evelyn Ruppert; Professor Daniel Grimley;

A Child's Garden of Verses by Robert Louis Stevenson The Language of Flowers by Kate Greenaway Kate Greenaway's Mother Goose Coloring Book by Kate Greenaway The Blue Fairy Book by Andrew Lang The Red Fairy Book by Andrew Lang The Yellow Fairy Book by Andrew Lang Preschool (9 Books) The Complete Tales of Winnie the Pooh by A. A. Milne The Complete Poems of Winnie the Pooh by A. A. Milne The .

David Greenaway is Vice Chancellor of the University of Nottingham, Professor of Economics and GEP Research Fellow . Joana Silva is a Young Professional at the World Bank and a Policy Associate of GEP. Acknowledgements . Falvey and Greenaway acknowledge financial support fro

David Greenaway, GEP, University of Nottingham Joakim Gullstrand, Lund University and GEP, University of Nottingham Richard Kneller, GEP, University of Nottingham Abstract An important contribution of heterogeneous-firm models is the need to consider the determ

& University Registrar I am pleased to present the Office of the University Registrar’s Annual Report for the 2018-2019 academic year. New tools, staff changes, and the addition of the Student Information Systems team to the OUR, are a few highlights of the year. Working with our One Emory

Although adventure tourism is rapidly growing South Africa, research on the subject in this region is relatively limited. A few studies have examined issues and challenges facing the adventure tourism industry as a whole. Rogerson (2007) noted some of the challenges facing the development of adventure tourism in South Africa. One was the lack of marketing, particularly marketing South Africa .