Deciding On The Appropriate JCT Contract 2016

3y ago
124 Views
4 Downloads
562.59 KB
47 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Tia Newell
Transcription

Deciding on the appropriate JCTcontract 20162016

Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contractThis Practice Note is intended to provide assistance in deciding the appropriate form of contract but it is not a substitutefor professional advice.Published May 2017 by Thomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited, trading asSweet & Maxwell, Registered in England & Wales. Company number 1679046.Registered office 5 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5AQ.All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any formor by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except in accordance with the provisionsof the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Thomson Reutersand the Thomson Reuters Logo are trademarks of Thomson Reuters. Sweet & Maxwell is a registered trademark ofThomson Reuters (Professional) UK Limited. The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017www.jctltd.co.uk

ContentsIntroductionPage 1Part 1: Project Strategy2Procurement methods2Types of contract4Matters which might influence choice5Consequences of the choice of main contract6Watchpoints for choice and use8Part 2: Range of JCT Main Contracts9Traditional or conventional : Lump sum9Traditional or conventional: Measurement14Traditional or conventional: Cost reimbursement or cost plus15Design and build16Management17Partnering19Framework Agreement20Pre-Construction Services Agreement20Consultancy Agreement21Part 3: Range of JCT Sub-Contracts and re-Construction Services Agreement27Part 4: Comparison of Contract Provisions29Guide to selecting the appropriate JCT main contract33Guide to selecting the appropriate JCT sub-contract34JCT Construction Contracts39Part 5: JCT Publications40 The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract 2016Page i

Introduction1This Practice Note has five Parts: Part 1 covers the project strategy and although this mainly is concerned withthe top level of contracting it also has relevance to the sub-contract level; Parts 2 and 3 respectively identify theavailable main and sub-contracts; Part 4 provides a tabulated comparison of provisions of some of the mostused contracts and a flow chart to assist users in making their choice; and Part 5 a list of JCT publications.2When approaching the question of the appropriate JCT construction contract, the first decisions to be made arethose concerning the choice of procurement and the type of contractual arrangement. Only when these twodecisions have been made can the choice of a form of contract be decided.3JCT provides a wide range of forms of contract to meet the various and diverse needs of the UK constructionindustry.4The Scottish Building Contract Committee (SBCC), a member of JCT, has in the past prepared and publishedScottish Supplements to many JCT forms of contract, for use where Scots law is to apply. SBCC now publishesintegrated documents, that is a JCT contract which has been amended formally for use where Scots law is toapply. Additionally, the Royal Society of Ulster Architects continues to publish Adaptation Schedules for certainJCT contracts for use in Northern Ireland.5The concept of partnering plays an important part in procurement strategy and may impact upon the choice ofcontract. A discrete section on partnering is included in this Practice Note. The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract 2016Page 1

Part 1Project Strategy6Procurement is a generic term embracing all those activities undertaken by a client seeking to bring about theconstruction or refurbishment of a building. Variously referred to as a method, path or system, procurement isinitiated by devising a project strategy, which entails weighing up the benefits, risks and financial constraintswhich attend the project and which eventually will be reflected in the choice of contractual arrangements. Inevery project the concerns of the client will focus on time, cost, and performance or quality, in relation both todesign and to construction of the building.7The project strategy will necessitate making an analysis of the situation, making a choice from the procurementoptions and then devising a method of implementing that choice, using well established rules and procedures.The client’s policies, available resources, organisational structure and preferred contractual arrangements willneed to be taken into account. There are inherent risks associated with using any particular procurementstrategy but equally important is the need for all parties to comply with their respective obligations; this isparticularly important where responsibility for design and construction are separated. Identifying and dealingappropriately with risk at the outset is an integral part of any project strategy.Procurement methods8There are three main procurement options, and the essential features of each are as follows:Traditional procurement (sometimes termed conventional procurement)9A method which became standard practice in the building industry for 150 years following the emergence of thegeneral contracting firm and the establishment of independent client consultants. The main feature is that thedesign process is separate from construction, and full documentation is required before the contractor can beinvited to tender for carrying out the work. Appointment of a contractor is commonly by competitive tender, but less usually by negotiation. Full documentation is necessary for tendering purposes, including that from specialist sub-contractors, andadequate time is needed for the preparation of this. The client has control over design, specified quality and standards etc. through his appointed consultants.Generally there is no design responsibility on the contractor. Because design and construction are separate sequential processes, the overall programme for the projecttends to be relatively long. There is for the client reasonable certainty on construction costs, because a contract figure is usually knownat the outset, although this may need to be adjusted later, as provided for in the contract. The terms of many traditional contracts require the client to appoint a professional consultant to act as anindependent contract administrator. Although making design decisions before work has commenced may appear to bring a measure ofinflexibility, changes or variations are possible during construction of the work, usually at a price in terms ofdirect and related costs and extra time. Administrative matters relating to valuations and payments are in the hands of the client’s consultants. Completion within the contract period is an obligation, although the contract administrator may need to revisethe date for completion to take account of delays due to reasons listed in the contract. Speculative risks are balanced as between the parties, more in the client’s favour on a lump sum contract,but less so with a measurement contract. The traditional lump sum approach in terms of cost, design andquality is a relatively low risk procurement option for the client, but the time needed for the project overall islikely to be relatively longer than that of other procurement methods. The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract 2016Page 2

10Traditional procurement, however, can be used in a wide range of situations, whether the basis for pricing resultsin a lump sum contract, a measurement contract or a cost plus contract, and whether the project is a single oneoff project, or part of a programme under a specific term or other form of serial or continuity contract.Design and build procurement11A method where the contractor is responsible for undertaking both the design and the construction of the work inreturn for a lump sum price. There are variants on this option depending on the degree to which initial design isincluded in the client’s requirements. Appointment of a contractor is often by two stage tendering, thus keeping a competitive element, but notexpecting every tenderer to produce full proposals. The client’s requirements can range from a simple accommodation schedule to a fully worked out schemedesign, but generally should be matched by the contractor’s proposals. Adequate time must be allowed forthe client’s requirements to be prepared to the appropriate level, and professional consultants will usually berequired. The contractor must be given adequate time to prepare his proposals, together with an analysis ofhis tender figure. It should also be remembered that evaluating tenders for design and build may be difficult,because design proposals need to be balanced against price, and it is vital to check that the proposalssatisfy the client’s requirements. The client has control over the design element included as part of his requirements, but, once the contract islet, has no direct control over the development of the contractor’s detail design. The contractor assumesresponsibility for design at this point, and usually appoints his own consultants (although the designers maybe in-house) to formulate a design or to develop the design in the client’s requirements as necessary.Although it is a common practice for the client to ask the contractor to take over his own consultants under anovation agreement, there can be problems in such arrangements in terms of design accountability. Because design and construction may proceed in parallel, it may be possible for the overall programme timefor the project to be shortened; by how much will depend on the extent to which the contractor is responsiblefor design, and for design development. There can be reasonable certainty over construction costs because a contract price is known at the outset.Provided that the client refrains from ordering changes during the construction of the work, the contractor willbe obliged, subject to the conditions, to complete the project for the contract sum. The terms of a design and build contract make no provision for an independent contract administrator.Decisions or instructions may be required of the client from time to time, and the client may decide to appointan agent either to advise or to act on his behalf. It might be possible for the client to order design or specification changes during construction, but theconsequences in terms of direct costs, cost of disturbance and additional time needed will be largely for thecontractor to advise upon. Matters relating to valuation and payments are often left largely in the hands of the contractor. The client mayappoint his own consultant to advise, but the contract conditions do not recognise a role for such a person. Completion within the contract period is an obligation on the contractor, although the client may have toaccept a later completion to take account of delays due to reasons listed in the contract. Speculative risks are largely with the contractor, but can reduce according to the extent of the design input bythe client. In terms of cost and time this is a relatively low risk procurement option for the client, but there canbe uncertainty over design and quality, particularly if insufficient attention was paid initially to the preparationof the client’s requirements and the checking of the contractor’s proposals.12Design and build arrangements can take various forms. The client may take a standard design from amanufacturer, sometimes called a ‘package deal’, or enter into a turnkey contract. The client may decide to placethe design decision making with the contractor, thereby in theory opting for a single point responsibility; inpractice, single point responsibility is not often achieved.Management procurement13A method where overall design is the responsibility of the client’s consultants, and the contractor is responsibleboth for defining packages of work and then for managing the carrying out of this work through separate tradesor works contracts. The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract 2016Page 3

Appointment of the contractor is usually by negotiation or tender, and interview. He is paid a managementfee. The work packages are let by competitive tender. The client will start by appointing consultants to prepare project drawings, a project specification and a costplan. Involvement of the contractor at an early stage can be beneficial through his expertise in such mattersas buildability and programming of work packages. The client retains overall design control through the professional team. Detail design can proceed in parallel with construction work and much of this might be of a specialist naturerelating to work packages. As a consequence an early start on site is often possible, and time for the projectmay be reduced overall. There is no certainty over costs at the outset and work proceeds on the basis of the contract cost plan. Finalcosts will not be known until the last work package is let. However, the costs can be monitored by the client’squantity surveyor and action taken as necessary. The client will need to appoint a contract administrator as part of the professional team. Design changes are possible as construction proceeds, always provided that the changes do not affect workpackages already let so as to result in abortive work. With management contracts, administrative matters relating to valuations and payments are in the hands ofthe client’s consultants. Completion within the contract period is an obligation of the management contractor, who may not awardextensions of time in relation to work packages without the prior approval of the contract administrator. Speculative risks are largely with the client, and this procurement method calls for a measure of trust,goodwill and in-house expertise. In terms of design and quality it is a relatively low risk option for the client,but there is generally a higher risk in respect of costs and time.14Management procurement can take a variety of forms. With management contracts, the client appoints a fullprofessional team and a management contractor who is responsible for managing the carrying out of the works.The management contractor does not directly undertake any of the construction work, which is broken down intopackages and carried out by works contractors. These are appointed by the management contractor, and aredirectly and contractually accountable to him.15Construction management is a type of management procurement where the client appoints a design team andenters into an agreement with the construction manager or appoints an in-house manager. The constructionmanager does not directly undertake any of the construction work, which is broken down into packages andcarried out by trade contractors. These trade contractors are appointed by the client, and are directly andcontractually responsible to him. The client therefore assumes a major role in directing the project, whilst leavingthe management of it to the construction manager.16With ‘design and manage’ procurement, the management contractor not only assumes responsibility formanaging the works packages, but is also responsible for the design team.Types of contractTraditional17For traditional procurement there are three main types of contract: Lump sum contracts – where the contract sum is determined before construction work is started.The contractor undertakes a defined amount of work in return for an agreed sum. Contracts ‘with quantities’are priced on the basis of drawings and a firm bill of quantities. Contracts ‘without quantities’ are priced onthe basis of drawings and another document — usually a specification or work schedules. Measurement contracts – where the contract sum is not finalised until after completion, but is assessed onremeasurement to a previously agreed basis.This type of contract can arise because the work which the contractor undertakes cannot for good reason bemeasured accurately before tenders are invited. Design will be reasonably complete and an accurate pictureof the quality required will be available to the tenderer. Probably the contract of this type with least risk to theclient is that based on drawings and approximate quantities. Measurement contracts can also be based on The Joint Contracts Tribunal Limited 2017Practice Note – Deciding on the appropriate JCT contract 2016Page 4

drawings and a schedule of rates or prices. A variant of this is the measured term contract under whichindividual works can be initiated by instructions as part of a programme of work, and priced according torates related to the categories of work likely to form part of the programme. Cost reimbursement contracts – where the sum is arrived at on the basis of prime (actual) costs of labour,plant and materials, to which there is added an amount to cover overheads and profit.Sometimes referred to as a ‘cost-plus’ or a ‘prime cost’ contract; the amount or fee added to cover overheadsand profit can be a fixed sum, a percentage, or on some other reimbursement basis. Where the full extent ofthe work is not known or cannot be designed pre-tender, this is a relatively high risk option for the client andonly generally acceptable where the circumstances preclude other alternatives or where a partnering ethos isestablished.Design and build18For design and build procurement there are three main types of contract: Package deal or turnkey contract – where the client settles on a complete package, usually to somestandard specification from a commercial firm.Such arrangements sometimes result in a specially drafted contract, but they will usually be based on theprovider’s standard terms. Design and build contracts – where project documents will be written with the contractor’s designobligations relating to the whole of the works in mind.These contracts differ fundamentally from traditional ‘work and materials’ contracts in that they expresslyprovide for contractor’s design obligations. The wording used in contracts which require a material level ofdesign input from the contractor is often the same as in those which are used for a ‘develop and construct’approach. Contractor’s design for specific elements onlyStrictly, these are not design and build contracts, but traditional ‘work and materials’ contracts which includefor limited design provision relating to an identified portion of the work.Management19For management procurement there are two main types of contract, but variants do exist: Management contracts – where the management contractor undertakes to manage the carrying out of thework through works contractors, who are contractually accountable to him.The contract will usually include both a pre-construction phase and the construction phase. Documentationwill start with project drawings, a project specification and a cost plan, and this information will allow thetransmutation into documents on which competitive tenders can be obtained for the work packages. Themanagement contractor is responsible for the administration and operation of the works contractors.However, the management contractor is not liable for the consequences of any default by a works contractorso long as the management contractor has complied with the particular requirements of the managementcontract. Obviously the management contract and the works contracts for each package must be compatible. Construction Management – where the construction manager undertakes to manage the carrying out of thework through trade contractors but the client is involved in the directing of the project, and the contracts withthe trade contractors are directly with him.The construction management appointment will be for the services as defined in that document. Although thetrades contrac

4 The Scottish Building Contract Committee (SBCC), a member of JCT, has in the past prepared and published Scottish Supplements to many JCT forms of contract, for use where Scots law is to apply. SBCC now publishes integrated documents, that is a JCT contract which has been amended formally for use where Scots law is to apply.

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

A JCT Intermediate Building Contract (IC) A JCT Intermediate Building Contract with contractor’s design (ICD) A JCT Design and Build Contract (DB) A JCT Prime Cost Building Contract (PCC) Contractor Collateral Warranty for a Purchaser or Tenant Revision 2009 (CWa/P&T) ISBN: 978-0-414-04110-3 Price: 13.76

4 The Scottish Building Contract Committee (SBCC), a member of JCT, has in the past prepared and published Scottish Supplements to many JCT forms of contract, for use where Scots law is to apply. SBCC now publishes integrated documents, that is a JCT contract which has been amended formally for use where Scots law is to apply.

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

A. Thomas Perhacs is the author, creator, and visionary behind the Mind Force Method. He is also the President of Velocity Group Publishing and Director of The