DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FRAMED STRUCTURES

2y ago
6 Views
2 Downloads
739.98 KB
66 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Giovanna Wyche
Transcription

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FRAMED STRUCTURESA THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENTOF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OFBACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGYINCIVIL ENGINEERINGBYKammula ViswanathGhamandi Lal MeenaDepartment of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela2008

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF FRAMED STRUCTURESA THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENTOF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OFBACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGYINCIVIL ENGINEERINGBYKammula ViswanathGhamandi Lal MeenaUnder the Guidance ofProf . K.C.BiswalDepartment of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela2008ii

National Institute of TechnologyRourkelaCERTIFICATEThis is to certify that the thesis entitled, “Dynamic Analysis OfFramed Structures” submitted by Sri Kammula Viswanath and SriGhamandi Lal Meena in partial fulfillment of the requirements forthe award of Bachelor of Technology Degree in Civil Engineering att h e N a t i o n a l I n s t i t u t e o f T e c h n o l o g y, R o u r k e l a i s a n a u t h e n t i c w o r kcarried out by him under my supervision and guidance.To the best of my knowledge, the matter embodied in the thesis hasn o t b e e n s u b m i t t e d t o a n y o t h e r U n i v e r s i t y/ I n s t i t u t e f o r t h e a w a r d o fany Degree or Diploma.Date:Prof. Kishore Chandra BiswalDept. of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkela-769008iii

National Institute of TechnologyRourkelaAC K N O W L E D G E M E N TWe would like to express our sincere gratitude to cooperationandconstant encouragement during the course of the project. We dguidance. We are also thankful to the Technical Staff of theSt ructu ral Lab o rator y, N. I. T. R ou rkel a fo r help ing us du ring t heexperimental work.Kammula ViswanathGhamandi Lal MeenaDept. of Civil EngineeringDept. of Civil EngineeringN.I.T RourkelaN.I.T Rourkelaiv

C O NT E N T SChapter 1FINITE ELEMENT METHOD1.11.21.31.4Introduction TheoryThe Finite Element MethodStiffness matrixMass Matrix261212Chapter 2 THEORY OF VIBRATION2.12.2Sin gl e Degree Of Freedom s ys t em sM ul ti Degree Of Freed om S ys t em s1526Chapter 3 DYNAMIC ANALYSIS BYNUMERICAL INTEGRATION3.1 Introduction3.2 Various Methods of Numerical Integration3.3 The Newmark Method3.4 Duhamel’s Integral29303032C h a p t e r 4 P L AN E FR A ME A NA L YS I S4 . 1 S t e p s I n v o l v e d I n F r a me An a l ys i s34C h a p t e r 5 P RO B L E MS S O L V E D40C h a p t e r 6 C O MP U T E R P RO G RA M ME S54CONCLUSIONR E FE RE NC E S5758v

ABSTRACTAll real physical structures, when subjected to loads or displacements, behavedynamically. The additional inertia forces, from Newton’s second law, are equal tothe mass times the acceleration. If the loads or displacements are applied very slowlythen the inertia forces can be neglected and a static load analysis can be justified.Hence, dynamic analysis is a simple extension of static analysis.In addition, all real structures potentially have an infinite number of displacements.Therefore, the most critical phase of a structural analysis is to create a computermodel, with a finite number of mass less members and a finite number of node (joint)displacements, that will simulate the behavior of the real structure. The mass of astructural system, which can be accurately estimated, is lumped at the nodes. Also,for linear elastic structures the stiffness properties of the members, with the aid ofexperimental data, can be approximated with a high degree of confidence. However,the dynamic loading, energy dissipation properties and boundary (foundation)conditions for many structures are difficult to estimate. This is always true for thecases of seismic input or wind loads.To reduce the errors that may be caused by the approximations summarized in theprevious paragraph, it is necessary to conduct many different dynamic analysesusing different computer models, loading and boundary conditions. Because of thelarge number of computer runs required for a typical dynamic analysis, it is veryimportant that accurate and numerically efficient methods be used within computerprogramsvi

L I S T O F FI G UR E SF I G UR E SP A G E NO S .Fig. 1 Various Degrees of Freedom7Fig. 2 Illustration of Free vibration (no external force) of a sdof15system with viscous dampingFig. 3 The displacement plot of an under damped system18Fig. 4 The displacement plot of a critically-damped system with positive initialdisplacement and velocity19Fig. 5 The displacement plot of an over damped system20Fig. 6 The SDOF system forced by the harmonic function f(t)21Fig. 7 The SDOF system forced by the harmonic function f(t) cos(wt)23Fig. 8 the displacement amplitude of Un damped system24Fig. 9 An Impulsive Loading25Fig. 10 Representation of a general Dynamic load by a series of impulses26Fig. 11 Diagram showing local and Global coordinates of Beam member34Fig. 12 Forcing Function of Problem 140Fig. 13 Response Vs Time graph of problem 140Fig. 14 Forcing Function of Problem 241Fig. 15 Response Vs Time graph of problem 241Fig. 16 Displacement Vs Time of problem 3 for forcing frequency ώ 16 rad /s42Fig. 17 Displacement Vs Time of problem 3 for forcing frequency ώ 18 rad /s42Fig.18 Displacement Vs Time of problem 3 for forcing frequency ώ 20rad /s43Fig. 19 Displacement Vs Time of problem 3 for forcing frequency ώ 22 rad /s43Fig. 20 Displacement Vs Time of problem 3 for forcing frequency ώ 24 rad /s43Fig. 21 A plane frame having two prismatic beam elements and three dof44For Problem 4Fig. 22 A plane frame having three prismatic beam elements and three dofFor Problem 5vii46

Fig. 23 Response Vs Time graph of problem 650Fig. 24 Response Vs Time graph of problem 6 enlarged scale50Fig. 25 Response Vs Time graph of problem 752Fig. 26 Response Vs Time graph of problem 7 enlarged scale52LIST OF TABLEST AB L E SP AG E NO S .Table 1 Table showing time,Displacement ,Velocity ,Accleleration in Problem 6 49Table 2 Table showing time,Displacement ,Velocity ,Accleleration in Problem 7 51viii

CHAPTER 1FINITE ELEM ENT METHOD1

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD1.1 INTRODUCTIONTheory1.1.1Where this Material FitsThe field of Mechanics can be subdivided into three major areas:Theoretical mechanics deals with fundamental laws and principles of mechanics studiedfor their intrinsic scientific value. Applied mechanics transfers this theoretical knowledgeto scientific and engineering applications, especially as regards the construction ofmathematical models of physical phenomena. Computational mechanics solves specificproblems by simulation through numerical methods implemented on digital computers.1.1.2Computational MechanicsSeveral branches of computational mechanics can be distinguished according to thephysical scale of the focus of attention:2

Nano mechanics deals with phenomena at the molecular and atomic levels of matter. Assuch it is closely linked to particle physics and chemistry. Micro mechanics looksprimarily at the crystallographic and granular levels of matter. Its main technologicalapplication is the design and fabrication of materials and micro devices.Continuum mechanics studies bodies at the macroscopic level, using continuum modelsin which the microstructure is homogenized by phenomenological averages. The twotraditional areas of application are solid and fluid mechanics. The former includesstructures which, for obvious reasons, are fabricated with solids. Computational solidmechanics takes an applied sciences approach, whereas computational structuralmechanics emphasizes technological applications to the analysis And design ofstructures.Computational fluid mechanics deals with problems that involve the equilibrium andmotion of liquid and gases. Well developed subsidiaries are hydrodynamics,aerodynamics, acoustics, atmospheric physics, shock, combustion and propulsion.A system is studied by decomposition: its behavior is that of its components plus theinteraction between components. Components are broken down into subcomponents andso on. As this hierarchical breakdown process continues, individual components becomesimple enough to be treated by individual disciplines, but component interactions getmore complex.3

1.1.3Statics vs. DynamicsContinuum mechanics problems may be subdivided according to whether inertial effectsare taken into account or not:In dynamics actual time dependence must be explicitly considered, because thecalculation of inertial (and/or damping) forces requires derivatives respect to actual timeto be taken.Problems in statics may also be time dependent but with inertial forces ignored orneglected. Accordingly static problems may be classed into strictly static and quasi-static.For the former time need not be considered explicitly; any historical time-like responseordering parameter, if one is needed, will do. In quasi-static problems such as foundationsettlement, metal creep, rate-dependent plasticity or fatigue cycling, a realistic measure oftime is required but inertial forces are still neglected.1.1.4 Discretization methodsA final classification of CSM static analysis is based on the discretization method bywhich the continuum mathematical model is discretized in space, i.e., converted to adiscrete model with a finite number of degrees of freedom:4

In CSM linear problems finite element methods currently dominate the scene as regardsspace discretization. Boundary element methods post a strong second choice in specificapplication areas. For nonlinear problems the dominance of finite element methods isoverwhelming.1.1.5 FEM VariantsThe term Finite Element Method actually identifies a broad spectrum of techniques thatshare common features outlined in above sections. Two sub classifications that fit wellapplications to structural mechanics areOf the variants listed above, emphasis is placed on the displacement formulation andstiffness solution. This combination is called the Direct Stiffness Method or DSM.5

1.2 The Finite Element MethodThe finite element method (FEM) is the dominant discretization technique in structuralmechanics.The basic concept in the physical FEM is the subdivision of the mathematical model intodisjoint (non-overlapping) components of simple geometry called finite elements orelements for short. The response of each element is expressed in terms of a finite numberof degrees of freedom characterized as the value of an unknown function, or functions, ata set of nodal points. The response of the mathematical model is then considered to beapproximated by that of the discrete model obtained by connecting or assembling thecollection of all elements.1.2.1Element AttributesThe procedure involves the separation of elements from their neighbors by disconnectingthe nodes, followed by referral of the element to a convenient local coordinate system.8After that we can consider generic elements: a bar element, a beam element, and so on.From the standpoint of the computer implementation, it means that you can write onesubroutine or module that constructs, by suitable parametrization, all elementsof one type, instead of writing a new one for each element instance.1.2.2DimensionalityElements can have intrinsic dimensionality of one, two or three space dimensions. Thereare also special elements with zero dimensionality, such as lumped springs or pointmasses. The intrinsic dimensionality can be expanded as necessary by use of kinematictransformations. For example a 1D element such as a bar, spar or beam may be used tobuild a model in 2D or 3D space.6

1.2.3NodesEach element possesses a set of distinguishing points called nodal points or nodes forshort. Nodes serve a dual purpose: definition of element geometry, and home for degreesof freedom. When a distinction is necessary we call the former geometric nodes and thelatter connection nodes. For most elements studied here, geometric and connector nodescoalesce.1.2.4 Degrees of FreedomThe element degrees of freedom (DOF) specify the state of the element. They alsofunction as “handles” through which adjacent elements are connected. DOFs are definedas the values (and possibly derivatives) of a primary field variable at connector nodepoints.A simple definition of "degrees of freedom" is - the number of coordinates that it takes touniquely specify the position of a system.SINGLE DOFTWO DOF(Figure 1)7SIX DOF

For mechanical elements, the primary variable is the displacement field and the DOF formany (but not all) elements are the displacement components at the nodes.If the number of degrees of freedom is finite, the model is called discrete, and continuousotherwise. Because FEM is a discretization method, the number of DOF of a FEM modelis necessarily finite. They are collected in a column vector called u. This vector is calledthe DOF vector or state vector. The term nodal displacement vector for u is reserved tomechanical applications.1.2.5Nodal ForcesThere is always a set of nodal forces in a one-to-one correspondence with degrees offreedom. In mechanical elements the correspondence is established through energyarguments.1.2.6AssemblyThe assembly procedure of the Direct Stiffness Method for a general finite elementmodel follows rules identical in principle to those discussed for the truss example. As inthat case the process involves two basic steps:Globalization. The element equations are transformed to a common global coordinatesystem, if necessary.Merge. The element stiffness equations are merged into the master stiffness equations byappropriate indexing and matrix-entry addition.The master stiffness equations in practical applications may involve thousands or evenmillions of freedoms, and programming can become involved.8

1.2.7 Essential and Natural B.C.The key thing to remember is that boundary conditions (BCs) come in two basic flavors:essential and natural.Essential BCs directly affect DOFs, and are imposed on the left-hand side vector u.Natural BCs do not directly affect DOFs and are imposed on the right-hand side vector f.The mathematical justification for this distinction requires use of concepts fromvariational calculus, and is consequently relegated to Part II. For the moment, the basicrecipe is:1. If a boundary condition involves one or more degrees of freedom in a directway, it is essential. An example is a prescribed node displacement.2. Otherwise it is natural.The term “direct” is meant to exclude derivatives of the primary function, unlessthose derivatives also appear as degrees of freedom, such as rotations in beams andplates.1.2.8Boundary Conditions in Structural ProblemsEssential boundary conditions in mechanical problems involve displacements (but notstrain-type displacement derivatives). Support conditions for a building or bridgeproblem furnish a particularly simple example. But there are more general boundaryconditions that occur in practice.The total potential energy in the body is 0.5 * QT K*Q – QT * F9

Where K is the structural stiffness matrix is the global load vector, and Q is the globaldisplacement vector. We now must arrive at the equations of equilibrium, from which wecan determine nodal displacements, element stresses and support reactions. The minimumpotential energy theorem is now invoked. This theorem is stated as follows: of allpossible displacements that satisfy the boundary conditions of a structural system, thosecorresponding to equilibrium configurations make the total potential energy assume aminimum value.It is noted that the treatment of boundary conditions in this sections is applicable to twoand three dimensional problems as well.It should be emphasized that improper specification of boundary conditions can lead toerroneous results. Boundary conditions eliminate the possibility of the structure movingas a rigid body.There are two approaches to calculate displacements:1. Elimination approach2. Penalty approach1.2.9 Elimination approach:Considering the single boundary condition Q1 a1. The equilibrium equations areobtained by minimizing pi with respect to Q, subjected to the boundary conditionQ1 a1.for an N- dof structure, we have Q [Q1,Q2, .Qn]F [F1, F2 .Fn]Steps involved :Consider the boundary conditions Q1 a1,Q2 a2 Qr ar.1. Store the p1 th,p2 th and pr th rows of the global stiffness matrix K and forcevector F.these rows will be used subsequently.10

2. Delete the p1th row and column, the p rth row and column from the K matrix. Theresulting stiffness matrix K is of dimension (N-r,N-r).similarly, the correspondingload vector F is of dimension(N-r,1).soKQ F3. For each element, extract the element, displacement vector q from the q vector,element connectivity, and determine element stresses.4. Using the information stored in step 1 ,evaluate the reaction forces at each supportdof fromRp1 Kp1 Q1 Kp2 Q2 Kp N QN –Fp1Rp2 Kp1 Q1 Kp2 Q2 Kp N QN ---------------Rpr Kpr1 Q1 Kpr2 Q2 KprN QN –Fpr21.2.10 Penalty approach:Consider the boundary condition Q1 a1,Q2 a2 Qr ar.1. Modify the structural stiffness matrix K by adding a large number C to each ofp1 th,p2 th and pr th diagonal elements of k . also modify the global loadvector F by adding Ca1 to Fa1 , Ca2 to Fa2 .and Car to Far . Solve KQ F forthe displacement Q, where K and F are the modified stiffness and loadmatrices.2. For each element, extract the element displacement vector q from the Qvector, using element connectivity and determinate the element stresses.3. Evaluate the reaction forces at each support fromRpi -C (Qpi –ai )i 1,2,3 .rIt should be noted that the penalty approach presented here is an approximateapproach. The accuracy of the solution particularly depends on choice of C.11

1.3 STIFFNESS MATRIXProperties:1. The dimension of the global stiffness matrix K is (N*N), where N is the number ofnodes .this follows from the fact that each node has only one DOF.2. K is symmetric.3. K is banded matrix. That is all elements outside of the band are zero. K(banded) is ofdimension [N*NBW],where NBW is the half-bandwidth.in many one dimensionalproblems such as the example just considered ,the connectivity of element I,i 1.in suchcases ,the banded matrix has only two columns (NBW 2).NBW max (difference between dof numbers connecting an element) 11.4 MASS MATRIX1.4.1IntroductionTo do dynamic and vibration finite element analysis, you need at least a mass matrix topair with the stiffness matrix.As a general rule, the construction of the master mass matrix M largely parallels that ofthe master stiffness matrix K. Mass matrices for individual elements are formed in localcoordinates, transformed to global, and merged into the master mass matrix followingexactly the same techniques used for K. In practical terms, the assemblers for K and Mcan be made identical. This procedural uniformity is one of the great assets of the DirectStiffness Method.12

A notable difference with the stiffness matrix is the possibility of using a diagonal massmatrix based on direct lumping. A master diagonal mass matrix can be stored simply as avector. If all entries are nonnegative, it is easily inverted, since the inverse of a diagonalmatrix is also diagonal. Obviously a lumped mass matrix entails significantcomputational advantages for calculations that involve M 1.1.4.2Mass Matrix ConstructionThe master mass matrix is built up from element contributions, and we start at that level.The construction of the mass matrix of individual elements can be carried out throughseveral methods. These can be categorized into three groups: direct mass lumping,variational mass lumping, and template mass lumping. The last group is more general inthat includes all others. Variants of the first two techniques are by now standard in theFEM literature, and implemented in all general purpose codes.1.4.3Mass Matrix PropertiesMass matrices must satisfy certain conditions that can be used for verification anddebugging. They are: (1) matrix symmetry, (2) physical symmetries, (3) conservation and(4) positivity.1.4.4GlobalizationLike their stiffness counterparts, mass matrices are often developed in a local or elementframe. Should globalization be necessary before merge, a congruent transformation isapplied:Me (Te)T *M’e *TeHere M’e is the element mass referred to is the element mass referred to the local framewhereas Te is the local-to-global displacement transformation matrix. Matrix Te is inprinciple that used for the stiffness globalization.13

CHAPTER 2Theory Of Vibration14

THEORY OF VIBRATION2.1 SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS2.1.1)Damped Vibration of Free SDOF SystemsDefinitionFree vibration (no external force) of a single degree-of-freedom system with viscousdamping can be illustrated as,(Figure 2)Damping that produces a damping force proportional to the mass's velocity is commonlyreferred to as "viscous damping", and is denoted graphically by a dashpot.Time Solution for Damped SDOF SystemsFor an unforced damped SDOF system, the general equation of motion becomes,with the initial conditions,15

This equation of motion is a second order, homogeneous, ordinary differential equation(ODE). If all parameters (mass, spring stiffness and viscous damping) are constants, theODE becomes a Linear ODE with constant coefficients and can be solved by theCharacteristic Equation method. The characteristic equation for this problem is,which determines the 2 independent roots for the damped vibration problem. The rootsto the characteristic equation fall into one of the following 3 cases:If 0, the system is termed under damped. The roots of the characteristicequation are complex conjugates, corresponding to oscillatory motion with anexponential decay in amplitude.If 0, the system is termed critically damped. The roots of the characteristicequation are repeated, corresponding to simple decaying motion with at most oneovershoot of the system's resting position.If 0, the system is termed over damped. The roots of the characteristicequation are purely real and distinct, corresponding to simple exponentially decayingmotion.To simplify the solutions coming up, we define the critical damping cc, the damping ratioξ, and the damped vibration frequency ωd as,16

Where the natural frequency of the system ωn is given by,Note that ωd will equal ωn when the damping of the system is zero (i.e. un damped). Thetime solution for the free SDOF system is presented below for each of the three casescenarios.Under damped SystemsWhen 0 (equivalent to 1 or ), the characteristic equation has apair of complex conjugate roots. The displacement solution for this kind of system is,An alternate but equivalent solution is given by,17

The displacement plot of an under damped system would appear as,(Figure 3)Note that the displacement amplitude decays exponentially (i.e. the natural logarithm ofthe amplitude ratio for any two displacements separated in time by a constant ratio is aconstant; long-winded!),whereis the period of the damped vibration.18

Critically-Damped SystemsWhen 0 (equivalent to 1 or ), the characteristic equation hasrepeated real roots. The displacement solution for this kind of system is,The critical damping factor cc can be interpreted as the minimum damping that results innon-periodic motion (i.e. simple decay).The displacement plot of a critically-damped system with positive initialdisplacement and velocity would appear as,(Figure 4)The displacement decays to a negligible level after one natural period, Tn. Note that if theinitial velocity v0 is negative while the initial displacement x0 is positive, there will existone overshoot of the resting position in the displacement plot.19

Over damped SystemsWhen 0 (equivalent to 1 or ), the characteristic equation has twodistinct real roots. The displacement solution for this kind of system is,The displacement plot of an over damped system would appear as,(Figure 5)20

The motion of an over damped system is non-periodic, regardless of the initialconditions. The larger the damping, the longer the time to decay from an initialdisturbance.If the system is heavily damped,, the displacement solution takes the approximateform,2.1.2) SDOF Systems under Harmonic ExcitationWhen a SDOF system is forced by f(t), the solution for the displacement x(t) consists oftwo parts: the complimentary solution, and the particular solution. The complimentarysolution for the problem is given by the free vibration discussion. The particular solutiondepends on the nature of the forcing function.When the forcing function is harmonic (i.e. it consists of at most a sine and cosine at thesame frequency, a quantity that can be expressed by the complex exponential eiωt), themethod of undetermined coefficients can be used to find the particular solution. Nonharmonic forcing functions are handled by other techniques.Consider the SDOF system forced by the harmonic function f(t),(Figure 6)The particular solution for this problem is found to be,21

The general solution is given by the sum of the complimentary and particular solutionsmultiplied by two weighting constants c1 and c2,The values of c1 and c2 are found by matching x(t 0) to the initial conditions.2.1.3) Undamped SDOF Systems under Harmonic ExcitationFor an un damped system (cv 0) the total displacement solution is,If the forcing frequency is close to the natural frequency,, the system will exhibitresonance (very large displacements) due to the near-zeros in the denominators of x(t).When the forcing frequency is equal to the natural frequency, we cannot use the x(t)given above as it would give divide-by-zero. Instead, we must use L hospitals Rule toderive a solution free of zeros in the denominators,22

To simplify x(t), let's assume that the driving force consists only of the cosinefunction,,(Figure 7)The displacement solution reduces to,This solution contains one term multiplied by t. This term will cause the displacementamplitude to increase linearly with time as the forcing function pumps energy into thesystem, as shown in the following displacement plot,23

(Figure 8)The maximum displacement of an un damped system forced at its resonant frequencywill increase unbounded according to the solution for x(t) above. However, real systemswill inject additional physics once displacements become large enough. These additionalphysics (nonlinear plastic deformation, heat transfer, buckling, etc.) will serve to limit themaximum displacement exhibited by the system, and allow one to escape the "suddendeath" impression that such systems will immediately fail.24

2.1.4) SDOF Systems under General Dynamic LoadingImpulsive ForceAn Impulsive Loading is a Load which is applied during a short duration of time.(Figure 9)The above figure shows the typical time history of an impulsive force, f(t), It can be seenthat the force is only non-zero in the short time interval t1 to t2. It is helpful to define aquantity known as the net impulse,, associated with.25:

(Figure 10)The Total Displacement of a UN damped Single degree of freedom system with anyorbitary load is given by CLASSIC SOLUTION as2.2 Multiple Degree –of –Freedom SYSTEMMulti degree-of-freedom system has the same basic form of the governing equationas a single degree-of-freedom system.The difference is that it is a matrix equation:26

So apply the same solution technique as for a single degree-of-freedom system.Free VibrationAgain assume a solution which has harmonic motion. It now has multiplecomponentswhere ω are the natural frequencies of the systemandSubstituting the assumes solution in to the matrixsetof governing equations :-ω2[m][A] eiωt [K] [A] eiωt [0]27

CHAPTER 3Dy namic Ana lysis By Numerical Integ ra tio n28

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS BY NUMERICAL INTEGRATION3.1 INTRODUCTIONThe most general approach for the solution of the dynamic response of structural Systemsis the direct numerical integration of the dynamic equilibrium equations. This involves,after the solution is defined at time zero, the attempt to satisfy dynamic equilibrium atdiscrete points in time. Most methods use equal time intervals at D t, 2Dt, 3Dt.NDt.Many different numerical techniques have previously been presented; however, allapproaches can fundamentally be classified as either explicit or implicit integrationmethods.Explicit methods do not involve the solution of a set of linear equations at each step.Basically, these methods use the differential equation at time “ t ” to predict a solution attime “t Dt”. For most real structures, which contain stiff elements, a very small time stepis required in order to obtain a stable solution. Therefore, all explicit methods areconditionally stable with respect to the size of the time step.Implicit methods attempt to satisfy the differential equation at time “ t ” after the solutionat time “t-Dt” is found. These methods require the solution of a set of linear equations ateach time step; however, larger time steps may be used. Implicit methods can beconditionally or unconditionally stable.There exist a large number of accurate, higher-order, multi-step methods that have beendeveloped for the numerical solution of differential equations. These multistep methodsassume that the solution is a smooth function in which the higher derivatives arecontinuous. The exact solution of many nonlinear structures requires that theaccelerations, the second derivative of the displacements, are not smooth functions. Thisdiscontinuity of the acceleration is caused by the nonlinear hysteresis of most structuralmaterials, contact between parts of the structure, and buckling of elements.29

3.2 The NUMERICAL SOLUTION can be calculated byvarious methods Duhamel Integral Newmark Integration method Central difference Method Houbolt Method Wilson θ Method3.3The Newmark metho

Hence, dynamic analysis is a simple extension of static analysis. In addition, all real structures potentially have an infinite number of displacements. Therefore, the most critic

Related Documents:

The analysis of framed structures is widely performed using the deformation method (DM). Because this method assumes a third-order displacement field, the elastic solution obtained by this method is consistent with the exact solution. Therefore, it is not necessary to develop a new analysis model for ordinary analysis of framed structures .

ANALYSIS OF 3D FRAMED STRUCTURES Bassam A. Izzuddin1 Key words: Framed Structures, Geometric Nonlinearity, Finite Rotations. Abstract This paper aims to clarify some of the conceptual issues which are related to the geometrically nonlinear analysis of 3D framed structures, and which have been a source of previous confusion.

has been developed for the analysis of structures equipped with this type of isolation connection (Hsu and Fafitis 1992). In this study, three different numerical earthquake records are used as input ground motions. The results of the non-linear time-history dynamic analysis of the framed structures equipped

Ink on paper 67 x 53 cm Framed 2,600 STILL LIFE WITH FELINE Charles Blackman Ink on paper 67 x 53 cm Framed 2,600 THE WIZARD Charles Blackman Ink on paper 67 x 53 cm Framed 2,600. BLACKMAN BY BROMLEY 16 HOMAGE TO BLACKMAN I David Bromley Acrylic on canvas 51 x 66 cm framed 3,500 HOMAGE TO BLACKMAN II David Bromley

4 Sub-Zero Customer Care 800.222.7820 Built-In Design Options FRAMED For the classic Sub-Zero look, choose framed custom door panels that contrast with the stainless steel full-length handles and louvered grille (shown). The framed applica-tion is an overlay model with framed design features. Panel, grille and handle options are available.

2.3 Development of second-order analysis of steel framed structures 2.3.1 General 2.3.2 Second-order analysis of angle struts 2.3.3 Second-order analysis for design purpose 2.3.4 Flexural-torsional buckling analysis 2.4 Analyses of steel framed structures 2.5 Concluding Remarks Chapter 3 Review of Current Design Methods 3.1 Introduction

Dec 06, 2018 · Dynamic Strategy, Dynamic Structure A Systematic Approach to Business Architecture “Dynamic Strategy, . Michael Porter dynamic capabilities vs. static capabilities David Teece “Dynamic Strategy, Dynamic Structure .

For the analysis of multi storey building nine types of models have been considered for analysis. Type -1 is regular framed structure with and without shear wall. Type-2, Type-3, Type-4 and Type-5 L-shape framed structure with and without shear wall. Type A, Type-B T-shape framed structure with and