Educational Research

2y ago
128 Views
7 Downloads
1.51 MB
31 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Lee Brooke
Transcription

EducationalResearchFundamentals forthe ConsumerSECONDEDITIONJAMES H. MCMILLANVirginia Commonwealth University* HarperCollins CollegePublishers

Ex urirr Editor: CbristopherJrnnisonProject Coordination and Text Design: Rottle, Shaw & M’rtberill, Inc.Cover Desigmr: Kay PrtronioElectronic Production Manager: Christine PearsonElectronic Page Makeup: RuttIe, Sbaw & Wrtherill, Inc.Manufacturing Manager: Helenr C. LandersPrinter and Binder: R. R. Donnellc & Sons CompanyCover Printer: The Lrhigh Press, Inc.For perrmssmn IO use copynghted marcrial, gratetirl acknowledgment is madeto thr copyright holders on pp. 358-359, which are hereby made pars of rhiscopyright page.Copyright 0 I996 by James H. McMillan411 rights reseru-ed. Printed in the United Statcr of Amrrica. No part ofthis book may be usrd or reproduced in any mannrr rvhatsoevrr withoutwritwn permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied incritical articles and reviews. For infonnarion addrrss HarperCollins CollegePublishers, 10 East 53rd Street, NewYork, r\Y 10022. ForinJarmatiun aboutany HarperCollins title, product, or raou m, plmsr visit our World Wide Web site athttp:,,www.harpercollins.com/college.McMillan, James H.Educational research : fundarrrenrals for rhc consumer / James H.McMillan. - 2nd ed.p.cm.Includes bibiiographical references and index.ISBN O-675-99864-9I. Title.1. Edncation-Research.LB1028.MP815 1 9 9 695-16506370’.78--dc20CIP95969798987654321

ContentsTo the InstructorTo the Studentxvxix1. Introduction to Research inEducation 1SOURCES OF KNOWLEDGE 2Personal Experience 2Tradition 3Authority 3The Scientific Approach 4THE NATURE OF SCIENTIFIC INQUIRYThe Purpose of Scientific Inquiry 4Characteristics of Scientific Inquiry 5The Purpose of Theories 64APPLYING SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY TOEDUCATION 79TYPES OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHTwo Traditions of Research: Quantitative andBasic Research 10Qualitative 9Action Research 12Applied Research 10Evaluation Research 12NonexoerimentalResearch 12Experimental Research 13I FORMAT TO REPORT EDUCATIONALRESEARCH 14Abstract 16Title and Author(s) 16Introduction 16Review of Literature 16Specific Research Question or Hypothesis 17Method and Design 17Results 17Discussion 17Conclusions 18References 18

viCONTENTSANATOMY OF A RESEARCH ARTICLE16OUTLINE SUMMARY 18STUDY QUESTIONS 27SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 282. Variables, Research Problems,and Hypotheses 31VARIABLES IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHConstitutive and Operational DefinitionsTypes of Variables 333232RESEARCH PROBLEMS 36Sources for Research Problems39CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGRESEARCH PROBLEMS 42HYPOTHESES 46Why Researchers Use HypothesesTypes of Hypotheses 4746CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGRESEARCH HYPOTHESES 49OUTLINE SUMMARY 51STUDY QUESTIONS 52SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS533. Locating and ReviewingRelated Literature 55THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING RELATEDLITERATURE 56Refining the Research Problem 56Developing Significance for the Research 56Identifying Methodological Techniques 57Identifying Contradictory Findings 57Developing Research Hypotheses 57Learning About New Information 57

CONTENTS58STEPS TO REVIEW RELATED LITERATUREStep One: Locate Existing Reviews and OtherInformation in Secondary Sources 58Step Two: Identify Key Terms 65Step Three: Identify the Appropriate JournalIndexes and Abstracts 67Step Four: Search Indexes for PrimarySources 68Step Five: Summarize and Analyze PrimarySource Information 74Step Six: Organize the Review 76CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGTHE REVIEW OF LITERATURE 77OUTLINE SUMMARY 80STUDY QUESTIONS 81SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 824. Subjects and Sampling 84INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLING 85What Is aWhat Is a Subject? 85What Is a Sample?Population? 8586TYPES OF SAMPLING PROCEDURES 86NonprobabilityProbability Sampling 86Sampling 91HOW SUBJECTS AND SAMPLING AFFECTRESEARCH 94Knowledge of Sampling Procedures 94Sample Size 96Volunteer Samples 94Sampling Bias 98Subject Motivation 97CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGSUBJECTS SECTIONS OF REPORTS ANDSAMPLING PROCEDURES 98OUTLINE SUMMARY 100STUDY QUESTIONS 101SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 101vii

viiiCONTENTS5. Foundations of EducationalMeasurement 104INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT 105Definition of Measurement 105The Purpose of Measurement for ResearchScales of Measurement 106106NNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF DESCRIPTIVESTATISTICS FOR UNDERSTANDINGMEASUREMENT 108Frequency Distributions 109Measures ofCentral Tendency 112Measures ofVariability 113Correlation 115VALIDITY OF EDUCATIONAL MEASURESDefinition of Validity 118Evidence for Judging ValidityValidity on Research 122ll6Types of119Effect ofRELIABILITY OF EDUCATIONALMEASURES I.23Types of Reliability 124Effect ofReliability on Research 127OUTLINE SUMMARY I.29STUDY QUESTIONS 130SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS1316. Types of EducationalMeasures 134CLASSIFYING EDUCATIONAL MEASURES I.35TESTS I.36Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Tests 136Standardized Tests 137Interpreting TestScores 141PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT 143

CONTENTSATTITUDE, VALUE, AND INTERESTINVENTORIES 144Types of Inventories 145Problems inMeasuring Noncognitive Traits 148OBSERVATIONS 150inference 150Laboratory Observation 151Structured Field Observations 152Observer Effects 153INTERVIEWS 154Types of interview QuestionsInterviewer Effects 155155LOCATING AND EVALUATING EDUCATIONALMEASURES 157CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGINSTRUMENTATION 158OUTLINE SUMMARY 182STUDY QUESTIONS 184SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 1857.Des&p t&e, Cowela tional, andCausal-Comparative Research167THEPURPOSEOFNONEXPERIMENTALRESEARCH 188DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES 188Characteristics of Descriptive Studies168CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR 5VALUATlNGDESCRIPTIVE STUDIES 170RELATIONSHIP STUDIES 171Relationship Determined by DifferencesSimple Correlational Studies 172Prediction Studies 176171CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGCORRELATIONAL STUDIES 178ix

ICONTENTSUSING SURVEYS IN DESCRIPTIVE ANDRELATIONSHIP STUDIES 182Cross-Sectional Surveys 182Longitudinal Surveys 183CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE STUDIES I.84Ex Post Facto ResearchCorrelational184Causal-Comparative Research 186CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGCAUSAL-COMPARATIVE RESEARCH 186OUTLINE SUMMARY 187STUDY QUESTIONS 168SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 1698. Experimental andSingle-Subject Research 192CHARACTERISTICS OF EXPERIMENTALRESEARCH 193EXPERIMENTAL VALIDITY 194History 195Selection 196Maturation 196Pretesting 197Instrumentation 197TreatmentSubject Attrition 198Replications 198Statistical Regression 198ExperimenterDiffusion of Treatment 199Subject Effects 200Effects 199TYPES OF EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS201Single-Group Posttest-Only Design 201SingleGroup Pretest-Posttest Design 202Nonequivalent-Groups Posttest-Only Design 203Nonequivalent-Groups Pretest-PosttestDesign 204Randomized-Groups Posttest-Only Design 206Randomized-Groups Pretest-PosttestDesign 207Factorial Experimental Designs 209CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGEXPERIMENTALRESEARCH 210

CONTENTSSINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH 212Characteristics of SingleSubject ResearchTypes of Single-Subject Designs 213212CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGSINGLE-SUBJECT RESEARCH 215OUTLINE SUMMARY 217STUDY QUESTIONS 218SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 2199. Analyzing StatisticalInferences 221THEPURPOSEANDNATUREOFINFERENTIALSTATISTICS 221Degree of Certainty 222Estimating Errorsin Sampling and Measurement 222TheNull Hypothesis 223INTERPRETING RESULTS OF INFERENTIALTESTS 225The t-Test 226Simple Analysis ofVariance 227Factorial Analysis ofVariance 228Analysis of Covariance 229Multivariate Statistics 230Chi-Square 230CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGINFERENTIAL STATISTICS 232OUTLINE SUMMARY 234STUDY QUESTIONS 234SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 23510. Qualitative and HistoricalResearch 238QUALITATIVE RESEARCH 239Characteristics of Qualitative ResearchQualitative Research Problems 241239xi

xiiCONTENTSEntering the Research Site 243SelectingObtaining QualitativeParticipants 243Analyzing QualitativeInformation 244Credibilityof QualitativeD a t a 248Research 250CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGQUALITATIVE RESEARCH 253HISTORICAL RESEARCH 254The Historical Method 255CONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGHISTORICAL RESEARCH 258OUTLINE SUMMARY 259STUDY QUESTIONS 261SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS 26211. Analyzing Discussion andConclusions 265PURPOSEANDNATUREOFTHEDISCUSSION 265INTERPRETATION OF THE RESULTS266Interpretation Related to the ProblemInterpretationand/or Hypothesis 266Related to Methodology 266Interpretation Based on StatisticalInterpretation Related toProcedures 269Previous Research 270CONCLUSIONS 272Limitations 273Implications 276Recommendations andCONSUMER TIPS: CRITERIA FOR EVALUATINGDISCUSSION SECTIONS 277OUTLINE SUMMARY 279STUDY QUESTIONS 279SAMPLE TEST QUESTIONS280

CONTENTS12. The Intelligent Consumer:Putting It All Together 282QUESTIONS FOR QUANTITATIVE STUDIES263QUESTIONS FOR QUALITATIVE STUDIES286QUESTIONS FOR HISTORICAL STUDIESEXAMPLES OF RESEARCH ARTICLES287288Article 1: A Study of Academic Time-on-Task inthe Elementary School 288Evaluation ofArticle 1 298Article 2: Reducing TeacherStress 304Evaluation of Article 2 3 1 6Article 3: Kindergarten Readiness andRetention: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’Beliefs and Practices 322Evaluation of Article 3 3 4 9Appendix: Answers to SampleTest QuestionshTef t?ncesAcknowledgmentsI&?‘%352353358360XIII

SubjectsandSam@ingNonprobabilityAffects ResearchTLimitations of Procedureshe third major part of research reports is the methodology or metkods section. As noted in Chapter 1, the first subsection of themethodology section usually describes the subjects from whom data arecollected. The manner in which subjects are selected has important implications for identiwng factors that affect subject performance and for

SUBJECTS AND SAMPLING85generalizing the results. Hence it is necessary to understand who thesubjects are and how they were selected.INTRODUCTION TO SAMPLINGWhat Is a Subject?A subject is an individual who participates in a research study or is some- subject: person from , ,om dataone from whom data are collected. In experiments, for example, each are collected.person who is given a treatment and whose behavior is measured is considered to be a subject. The term subject may also identify individualswhose behavior, past or present, is used as data, without their involvement in some type of treatment or intewention. For instance, a researcher might use last year’s fourth-grade test scores as data, and eachfourth-grader included is considered to be a subject. In qualitative research individuals are identified as patiicipants rather than subjects.What Is a Population?A popuMion is a group of elements or cases, whether individuals, ob. opu ion: PWSOW to whomjects, or events, that conform to specific criteria and to which we intend IwItS can be generalized.to generalize the results of the research. This group is also referred to asthe target p lation or ulziuene. The specification of the population begins with the research problem and review of literature, through whicha population is described conceptually or in broad terms, for example,seventh-grade students, beginning teachers, principals, special education teachers, and so forth. A more specific definition is then needed,based on demographic characteristics. These characteristics are sometimes referred to as delimitingvariables. For example, in a study of firstgrade minority students, there are three delimiting characteristics: students, first grade (age), and minority. Further delimiting variablesshould be added to provide as precise a definition as possible. Whatabout geographic region, socioeconomic status, gender, type of community, and types of schools? Are both public and private students included? How is “minority” defined? It is also important to distinguishthe target population from a list of elements from which a group of subjects is selected, which is termed the surv population or samplingframe.In a study of beginning teachers, the target population may be beginning teachers across the United States, in all wes of schools. The surveypopulation may be a list of beginning teachers that was obtained fromfour states. Although the intent may be all beginning teachers, the resuits are limited, or delimited, to beginning teachers in the four states.Thus, generalization from subjects to populations should be based onthe survey population.

86CHAPTER 4What Is a Sample?The sample is the group of elements, or a single element, from which Sample: Group of subjects fromdata are obtained. Although the phrase “the sample included .” is whom data are collected.used to indicate the characteristics of the people or events in the sarnple, the nature of the sampling procedure is usually described by one ormore adjectives, such as random sampling or stratified random sampling.These types of sampling procedures are defined, with illustrations fromactual studies, in the following section. It is important for the researcherto define as specifically as possible both the sampling procedure and thecharacteristics of the sample used in the study. Here is an example of agood description of the sample.:I. ,: “. .,y ,,,;2.1:.,.,;The sample for this study consisted of n&e se&h-grade. &thematics .?:teachers and their students. All teachers had vOlUnteered fat the study’ ;; and each teacher received a 5100 stipend. The teachers.taught in four :;public schools in a medium-sized Western city, a low-middle to middle : class community with a small proportion of minorities. Accordirig to a . . ,t) school district brochure, the district had apptOXimately 32,000 students :;) in 42 elementary schools, 9 middle schools, and 9 high schools during ‘:.;the school year the study was conducted.The ciass sizes ranged from 16 to 34. There’were 5 femb? and 4 .‘. male teachers. The teachers had an average of approximately 11 years of ‘;f teaching experience (range 2-26). Of these 11 years, 8 were as math : ;: teachers (range 2 22) and 6 were as middle-school math teachers .:(range 2-10). All had secondary cettification, and 4 had Master’s de-, .::grees in Administration. One of the teachers had a matlI major in college, .::6 a math minor, and 2 had no special training in math.” (Bur “sand Lash. ,::1986,p.395).I:’TYPES OF SAMPLING PROCEDURESThe purpose of sampling is to obtain a group of subjects who will berepresentative of the larger population or will provide specific information needed. The degree of representativeness is based on the samplingtechnique employed. I will first describe different sampling proceduresand then consider the strengths and weaknesses of each in obtaining arepresentative sample.Probability SamplingIn social science and educational research it is usually impractical andunnecessary to measure all the elements in the population of interest.Typically, a relatively small number of subjects or cases is selected from

SUBJECTS AND SAMPLING87the larger population. The goal is to select a sample that will adequatelyrepresent the population, so that what is described in the sample willalso be true of the population. The best procedure for selecting such asample is to use probability sampling, a method of sampling in which Probablllty sampling: Knownthe subjects are selected randomly in such a way that the researcher Probability of selection from theknows the probability of selecting each member of the population. p o p u l a t i o n .Random selection implies that each member of the population as awhole or of subgroups of the population has a” equal chance of beingselected. As long as the number of cases selected is large enough,it is likely that a very small percentage of the population, representedby the sample, will provide a” accurate description of the entirepopulation.It should be noted, however, that there is always some degree oferror in sampling, and that error must be considered in interpreting theresults of the sample. In probability sampling this calculation can bemade very precisely with some statistical procedures. Consider a population of 1,000 third-graders, from which you will select randomly 5 percent, or 50, to estimate the attitudes of all the third-graders towardschool. If the attitude score was 75 for the sample of 50 subjects, 75 canbe used to estimate the value for the entire population of third-graders.However, if another sample of 50 students is selected, their score mightbe a little different, say 73. Which one is more correct? Since all 1,000students have not been tested to obtain the result we do not know forsure, but the results can be used to estimate the error in sampling. Thisis basically the technique that political polls follow when it is reportedthat the vote is 45 percent 3. The plus or minus 3 is the estimate of error in sampling.There are many types of probability sampling procedures. You willprobably encounter four types in educational research: simple random,systematic, stratified, and cluster.Simple Random Sampling In simple random sampling evely memberof the population has a” equal and independent chance of being selected for the sample. This method is often used with a small number inthe population, for example, putting the names or numbers of all population members in a hat and drawing some out as the sample. If waymember of the population can be assigned a different number, a tableof random numbers can identify the population members that willmake up the sample. This approach is not convenient if the populationis large and not numbered. The most common way of selecting a random sample from a large population is by computer. There are computer programs that will assign numbers to each element in the population, generate the sample numbers randomly, and then print out thenames of the people corresponding to the numbers.Simple random sampling:Each member of the populationhas the same probability of beingselected.

88CHAPTER 4Simple random sampling is illustrated in the following study ofmothers’strategies for influencing their children’s schooling.mothers provided by the principal of the school.” (Baker and SteVensQn,:‘: 1986, p. 157):,Systematic Sampling In systematic sampling every nth element is se- systematic sampling: Everylected from a list of all elements in the population, beginning with a tih member of the population israndomly selected element. Thus, if there is a need to select 100 sub- selected.jects from a population of 50,000, every nth element would correspondto every 500th subject. The first element is selected randomly. In this example that would be some number between 1 and 500. Suppose 240were randomly selected as a starting point. The first subject chosen forthe sample would be the 240th name on a list, the next subject would bethe 74Oth, then the 1,24Oth, and so on until 100 subjects were selected.Systematic sampling is virtually the same as simple random sampling. Itis certainly much more convenient.There is a possible weakness in systematic sampling if the list ofcases in the population is arranged in a systematic pattern. For instance,if a list of fourth-graders in a school division is arranged by cla.ssroomand students in the classrooms are listed from high to low ability, thereis a cyclical pattern in the list (referred to as tiodicit ). If every nth subject that is selected corresponds to the pattern, the sample would represent only a certain level of ability and would not be representative of thepopulation. Alphabetical lists do not usually create periodicity and aresuitable for choosing subjects systematically.Stratified Sampling A modification of either simple random or systematic sampling is first to divide the population into homogeneous subgroups and then select subjects from each subgroup, using simple random or systematic procedures, rather than the population as a whole.This is termed stratified sampling. The strata are the subgroups. Strati- Stratified sampling: Subjects arefied sampling is used primarily for two reasons. First, as long as the sub- selected from Strata or groups ofgroups are identified by a variable related to the dependent variable in the population.the research (e.g., socioeconomic status in a study of achievement) andresults in more homogeneous groups, the sample will be more representative of the population than if taken from the population as awhole. This result reduces error and means that a smaller sample can bechosen.

ISUBJECTS AND SAMPLINGSecond, stratified sampling is used to ensure that an adequatenumber of subjects is selected from different subgroups. For example, ifa researcher is studying beginning elementary school teachers and believes that there may be important differences between male and femaleteachers, using simple random or systematic sampling would probablynot result in a sufficient number of male teachers to study the differences. It would be necessary in this situation tint to stratify the population of teachers into male and female teachers and then to select subjects from each subgroup. The samples can be selected in one of twoways. A proportional stratified sample, or propwtiona2 allocation, is usedwhen the number of subjects selected from each stratum is based on thepercentage of subjects in the population that have the characteristicused to form the stratum. Thus, in the previous example, if 5 percent ofthe population of elementary teachers is male, 5 percent of the samplewould also be male teachers.A second approach is to take the same number of subjects fromeach stratum, regardless of the percentage of subjects from each stratum in the population. This method is used often because it ensuresthat a sufEcient number of subjects will be selected from each stratum.For instance, if only 10 percent of a population of 200 elementary teachers are male, a proportional sample of 40 would include only 4 maleteachers. To study male teachers it would be better to include all 20male teachers in the population for the sample and randomly select 20female teachers. This sampling procedure is referred to as disproportional because the number of subjects in the sample from each subgroup is not proportional to the percentage of the subgroups in thepopulation. Disproportional stratified sampling is not limited to takingthe same number of subjects from each subgroup. When disproportional sampling is used the results of each stratum need to be weightedto estimate values for the population as a whole.In the following example disproportional stratified sampling ensures that the same number of first and third graders are selected randomly.2, age, 8 years, 8 months) were randomly selected.” (Clements and Nas-‘.‘:,::.: ::: .tasi;l988, p. 93).:::;::‘,.’,.;Stratified random sampling is illustrated in Figure 4.1. In this example the population is divided first into three different age groups,89

90CHAPTER 4then by gender. Once the groups are stratified by gender, random samples are selected from each of the six subgroups.Cluster Sampling When it is impossible or impractical to sample individual elements from the population as a whole, usually when there isno exhaustive list of all the elements, cluster sampling is used. Clustersampling involves the random selection of naturally occurring groups orareas and then the selection of individual elements from the chosengroups or areas. Examples of naturally occurring groups would be universities, schools, school divisions, classrooms, city blocks, and households. For example, if there is a need to survey a state for the televisionviewing habits of middle school students, it would be cumbersome anddifficult to select children at random from the state population of allmiddle-schoolers. A clustering procedure could be employed by firstlisting all the school divisions in the state and then randomly selecting30 school divisions from the list. One middle school could then be selected from each division, and students selected randomly from eachschool. This is a multistage clustering procedure. Although cluster sampling saves time and money, the results are less accurate than other random sampling techniques.

SUBJECTS AND SAMPLING91Nonprobability SamplingIn many research designs it is either unfeasible or unnecessary to obtaina probability sample. In these situations a nonprobability sample is used.A nonprobability sample is one in which the probability of includingpopulation elements is unknown. Usually, not every element in the population has a chance of being selected. It is also quite common for thepopulation to be the same as the sample, in which case there is no immediate need to generalize to a larger population. In fact you will findthat much of the educational research reported in journals, especiallyexperimental studies, uses a group of subjecw that has not been selectedfrom a larger population.Nonprobability sample: Probabil-ity of selection not known.Convenience Sampling A convenience sample is a group of subjects se- Convenience sample: Nonprobalected because of availability, for example, a university class of a profes- bility available sample.sor conducting some research on college students, classrooms of teachers enrolled in a graduate class, schools of principals in a workshop,people who decide to go to the mall on Saturday, or people who respond to an advertisement for subjects. There is no precise way of generalizing from a convenience sample to a population. Also, the natureof the convenience sample may bias the results. For example, if theavailable sample for studying the impact of college is the group ofalumni who return on alumni day, their responses would probably bequite different from those of all alumni. Similarly, research on effectiveteaching that depends on teachers in a particular geographic area, because they are available, may result in different findings than researchdone in other geographic areas.Although we need to be very way of convenience samples, oftenthis is the only type of sampling possible, and the primary purpose ofthe research may not be to generalize but to better understand relationships that may exist. Suppose a researcher is investigating the relationship between creativity and intelligence, and the only available sample isa single elementary school. The study is completed, and the resulu indicate a moderate relationship: Children who have higher intelligencetend to be more creative than children with lower intelligence. Becausethere was no probability sampling, should we ignore the findings or suggest that the results are not valid or credible? That decision seems overlyharsh. It is more reasonable to interpret the results as valid for childrensimilar to those studied. For example, if the school serves a low socioeconomic area, the results will not be as useful as those from a schoolthat sewes all socioeconomic levels. The decision is not to dismiss thefindings but to limit them to the type of subjects in the sample. As moreand more research accumulates with different convenience samples, theoverall credibility of the results is enhanced.

92CHAPTER 4Although it is not common for a researcher to state explicitly thata convenience sample was used, it will be obvious from the subjects subsection of the article. If some type of probability sampling procedurewas used it will be described. Thus, in the absence of such particularsyou can assume that the sample was an available one. The following examples are typical.: ‘”. : ;.: :,: ., :, . .: I .,. * : : . .‘I :.:-s:.donvenl n .Sarnpi )‘), j ,“Participants in the study were sixth grade stud& e&&U in f&r classes “”::: at a public school in a suburb north of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Of the total ‘!?‘:.:number. 65 students were bovs and 56 were eirls. From the oool of 121!:.:,,subjects, 7 were not included in the tinal analy& for various reasons, leav :‘., ,(;. : ing 114 subjects.” (Carrier and Williams, 1988, pp. 291-292), “Twelve volunteer third-grade teachers and their students participated in :;;: the study. The teachers were employed in 10 public schools located in 1:, ‘three school districts in suburban areas of northern California.” (Mitman. ‘ .‘,: . 1985, p. 151):j “The initial group of subjects in-‘this study was composed of 42 under- i1’. graduate secondary education students majoring in a variety of disci- I. 1: plines, They were about to be placed in classrooms to student teach for ::8, .‘.their first semester. Thirty-five of these students also participated in the !? .‘.concluding part of the experiment at the end of the semester, following a ,:!:: lOweek student teaching experience.” (Tiene and Buck, 1987, p, 262). “;:‘.‘: “The study was conducted in a school system of approximately 2,800:.;:elementary school students attending 6 schools. All kindergarten and:. first grade teachers using intraclassroom ability grouping were asked to: ;,patticipate. Of 22 teachers invited to .participate, 20 agreed and were: subsequently observed.” (Haskins, Walden and Ramey, 1983, pp.-, 8 6 7 - 8 6 8 )2.a;t:.’P rposl e Sampling In purposive sampling (sometimes referred to as uqxxive sampling: Selection ofpwposeful, judgmat or judgmental sampling) the researcher selects par- P articularly informative or usefultic&r elements from the population that will be representative or in- ‘Wects.formative about the topic. Based on the researcher’s knowledge of thepopulation, ajudgment is made about which cases should be selected toprovide the best information to address the purpose of the research. Forexample, in research on effective teaching it may be most informative toobserve “expert” or “master” teachers rather than all teachers. To studyeffective schools it may be most informative to interview key personnel,such as the principal and teachers who have been in the school a number of years. The use of “selected precincts” for political polls is a type ofpurposive sampling.

SUBJECTS AND SAMPLINGPurposive sampling is not widely used in quantitative studies. Inqualitative research, on the other hand, some ty

TYPES OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 9 Two Traditions of Research: Quantitative and Qualitative 9Basic Research 10 Applied Research10 Action Research12 Evaluation Research 12Nonexoerimental 13 I Research 12Experimental Research FORMAT TO REPORT EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 14 Title and Au

Related Documents:

EDUC 602 Educational Research & Methods Course Modules. Module One: Epistemology, Ontology and the Nature of Knowledge Module Two: What is Research and the Underlying Paradigms? Module Three: Educational Research and the Research Questions Asked Module Four: Methodologies used in Educational Research 1: Quantitative, Qualitative & Mixed-Methods

Keywords: Educational Values, The Karate Kid Movie This thesis described about the educational values in "karate kids" movie that done by Will and Jada Pinkett Smith. In analysis, this research focused on educational values in karate kids movie. The formulation of the problem waswhat are educational values in "The Karate Kids" movie.

basic educational research skills as a result of the course, and specifically learned how to conduct a small-scale research project. By conducting a small-scale education research project and writing a report on it, student teachers learned important educational research skills, such as how to detect problems, construct hypotheses, review

In his review of the state of educational research and more specifically educational technology research, Reeves (2006: 57) concludes that there is “a legacy of ill-conceived and . evaluation as the most prominent research activity in design research. Conducting design

tangentially related to educational choice, and we view this as leading to the separation of educational guidance and counseling from career theory. In a comprehensive review of educational guidance literature published from 1933–1956, Hutson (1958) saw the counseling element of the educational

Educational Corner Upcoming Webinars CTR Exam dates Educational Opportunities MCR Staff Abstracting Resources. EDUCATIONAL CORNER TOP 4 COMMON CODING ERRORS I SEE: . ample: Chest x-ray shows 3.5 cm mass; the pathology report from the surgery states that the same mass is malignant and measures 2.8 cm. Record tumor size as 028 (28 mm).

produced by an autodesk educational product produced by an autodesk educational product produced by an autodesk educational product produced by an autodesk educational product. architectural section for bc road 18 m width satkar hotel to home science college road 860 meters pedestrian path landscaping cycle track

The Being a Writer program combines a writing process approach with guided instruction to ensure students learn and practice the craft and conventions of writing. Every lesson operates in the context of a caring classroom community, crucial to motivating and inspiring students to grow as writers, thinkers, and principled people. The program is built on the assumption that academic and social .