Finite Element Analysis Of Simple Butt Type Adhesive Joint .

2y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
1.13 MB
5 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nixon Dill
Transcription

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.comFinite Element Analysis of Simple Butt TypeAdhesive Joint Using RADIOSSMr. Mahesh Shivaji KadamAssistant Professor, Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSanjay Ghodawat Group of Institutions,Atigre, Kolhapur, IndiaDr. Vivek V. KulkarniProfessor & Dean Academics, Mechanical Engineering DepartmentSanjay Ghodawat Group of Institutions,Atigre, Kolhapur, Indiaparameters of the bonded materials as well as on those of theadhesive layer. [1]AbstractMajority of automobile and aerospace parts, mainly their bodycomponents are joined together by different types ofadhesives. So these growing needs demand the detailed studyon stress concentration and strength analysis of adhesivejoints. With the help of structural analysis simulations we canidentify the problem areas, failure loads and solutions can bevalidated in computers without any expensive shop flooroperations prior to any tool construction. Structural analysissimulation is also helpful at the joint design stage to decidevarious parameters, like material used, load applied etc. In therecent years the use of finite element analysis is increased inthe strength analysis of sheet metal joints. Finite elementanalysis helps to analyze the process virtually.The present investigation reports a case study of a butt typeadhesive joint of similar and dissimilar metals. This joint issubjected to static tensile loading and the RADIOSS deck ofHyperworks 11.0 software package is used to carry out theanalysis. The analysis result helps in depicting the effects ofvarying load and material used on stress induced and hence onthe joint strength of metal to metal butt type adhesive jointunder static tensile loading is studied in this case study.Investigator considered the mechanical behavior and failureunder proportional, multi-axial loading using an instrumented,Arcan-type test. The statistical behaviour, also observed witha simple tensile test, seems to be related to the heterogeneousnature of the microstructure of the adhesive bond, whichcontains voids, as well as mineral particles for reinforcement.It is concluded that the statistical aspects of porositydistribution can clearly be seen to depend on several factors,such as the type of adhesive paste, the operator and the mixingprocess. Dispersion and distribution of porosities can explainthe variability of fracture strength in mechanical testingduring adhesive characterization. [2]Researcher investigated the effect of adhesive thickness ontensile and shear strength of a polyimide adhesive. Tensileand shear tests are carried out using butt and single lap joints.And concluded that the tensile strength for butt joint decreaseswith increasing adhesive thickness and shear strength forsingle lap joint is almost constant regardless of adhesivethickness, although a lot of scatter is observed in the tensileand shear strength of polyimide adhesive. The fabricatedjoints using the polyimide adhesive failed in an interfacialmanner regardless of adhesive thickness. [3]Keywords: Stress concentration, Strength analysis, Butt typeadhesive joints and Adhesive thickness.IntroductionThe influence of static tensile loading on stress distributionwithin the adhesive joint is analyzed by finite element method.Practically Von Mises stresses are maximum at edge anddecreases away from edge. Similarly shear stresses almostvanish towards the middle of the adhesive. The shear stresscontribution to the Von Mises stress is significant in the bondregion close to the metal plate; this in turn results in possiblefailure of bonding in this region. In actual practice strength ofadhesion to the metal surface is stronger than the strength ofthe adhesive itself. That means the joint will fail in midway ofadhesive instead of at the adhesive metal interface.Author prepared high-temperature organic adhesive by usingpreceramic polymer V-PMS as matrix, B4C powder and lowmelting point glass powder as additives, and is successfullyapplied to join Al2O3 ceramic. The obtained adhesiveexhibited outstanding heat-resistant property and bondingstrength. The results indicated that, up to 600 C, thepreceramic polymer and the glass additive play important rolein improving the bonding strength. Above 800 C, theoutstanding wetting property and chemical compatibility ofB2O3 formed by the oxidation of B4C are mainly responsiblefor the excellent high- temperature bonding strengths. [4]Literature ReviewResearcher presented the work on the strength and failureprediction of adhesive joints of brittle epoxy bonding of twodissimilar adherends, effects of bond thickness and scarf angleupon the strength of joints is addressed. The model forstrength prediction proposed is based on three parameters as,interface corner toughness, interfacial crack, fracturetoughness and interfacial toughness. It is reported that thestrength of adhesive joint reduces with increasing bondthickness and scarf angle. Also shear joint specimens havehigher reliability than butt and scarf joints. Although the stresssingularity order at interface corner is max. [5]The work of different researchers in the area of strengthanalysis of butt type adhesive joint is presented below,Author presented simple analytical formulae in literature toextract basic elastic material properties of adhesives subjectedto tensile loading. A numerical parameter study for differentcombinations of adherend/adhesive materials and butt-jointgeometries has been performed to investigate the influence ofThese parameters on the adhesive deformation. It is shownthat the shape of the deformed adhesive layer essentiallydepends on the specimen geometry and the material606

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.comInternational Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and ArchitectureInvestigator followed the strategy previously developed formonotonic loadings. The crack initiation in adhesively bondedjoints is analyzed, under various tensile /compression-shearcyclic loadings using a modified Arcan device with a singlebonded joint designed to strongly limit stress concentrations.Experimental results, for a ductile adhesive, under cyclicloadings are presented for different load amplitudes and meanloads; they underline that the evolutions of viscousdeformations and of damage depend on the loading type. [6]Creating the 3D modelThe 3D model of the component is created in CATIA V5 R16environment as shown in Figure 2. The model is created intwo easy steps. First one plate is created and assignsAluminium or Mild Steel material to it. Then create thesecond plate and assign the Aluminium or Mild Steel materialto it. These materials will decide the variation of materialcombinations in joint.Adhesive BondingA. Advantages of adhesive joints:The various types of adhesive joints are widely used now daysin automobile and aerospace industries because of its inherentadvantages listed below.It is lightweight chemical, so reduces weight of the joint ascompare to riveted or bolted which adds its self weight tothe joint.Adhesivejoining techniques do not require holes, asriveted or bolted joints do, which can lead to stressconcentration.Adhesives are compressible in nature which helps to dampthe vibrations generated at high speed.Different types of adhesives for different applications areavailable commercially at very low cost.Some special types of adhesives are able to sustain at veryhigh temperature and varying environmental conditions.Figure 2: 3D model of the Metal PlateHypermesh 11.0 is opened in user profileTo open RADIOSS, click Start then HyperMesh. A UserProfiles window should pop up, as shown in Figure 3. If theUser Profiles window doesn’t pop up go to Preferences thenclick on User Profiles. Under the Application drop down listselect HyperMesh then select RADIOSS Bulk Data deckand click on OK.B. Case study of butt type metal to metal adhesive joint:Figure 1: Butt type tensile joint configuration.Figure 1 shows the butt type tensile joint configuration usedfor the strength analysis in simulation with RADIOSS. TheStructural Epoxy Adhesive is used to join two metal Plates.Table 1: Material PropertiesModulus of ElasticityMaterial Used(E) in MPaStructural Epoxy1.085e3Aluminium6.895e4Mild Steel2.100e5Figure 3: User Profile of HyperworksPoisson’sRatio (ν)0.380.330.30The 3D model is imported in HyperMeshTo import 3D model, go to File and click on Import. Then forthe Import Type choose Geometry and for the File typechoose Auto Detect. Then click the yellow folder icon andbrowse to where the CatPart file is located and click on Importthen Close. The imported geometry i.e. two plates will look asshown in Figure 4.The material properties of the metal plates i.e. Aluminium andMild Steel and the adhesive used i.e. Structural Epoxy are asshown in Table 1. Following is the detailed procedure adoptedfor the Finite Element Analysis.607

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.comInternational Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and Architecturenodes on extreme left face of the red plate and apply an axialload on each node in Y direction. The model under constraintsis shown in Figure 7.Figure 4: Imported 3D model of the metal platesMesh the platesUse create-2D Automesh option to mesh both plates one byone, enter the following values to define the mesh.Element Size: 1.5Mesh Type: quadsClick on mesh button. A uniform mesh will be generated. Themeshed component will be seen as shown in Figure 5.Figure 7: Joint with Boundary ConditionsModel is checked and analysis is runAfter completing all boundary conditions and applying allloads, click on Analysis tab and save the file asAdhesive Joint.fem and click on Radioss. It will run thesolver file and displays that analysis is completed; the promptdisplay is shown in Figure 8.Figure 5: Meshed PlatesCreate adhesive connectorFor creating adhesive first of all hide one meshed plate thenselect some of the elements on end plate. Then click on elemsand select by face to select all elements on that face to join byadhesive. For components click on comps and select Plate 01and Plate 02. In type of connector select adhesives and enterthe value of density as 3 under (T1 T2)/2 options withtolerance of 10. An adhesive will be generated between thesetwo plates as shown in Figure 6.Figure 8: Solver Run promptView the resultsTo see the results click on Hyperview in Analysis tab. We willget the required results such as displacements and elementalstresses (Von-Mises and maximum shear stresses) inHyperview environment. Figure 9 shows the magnitude ofdisplacement for the joint of 1 mm adhesive thickness understatic tensile loading.Figure 6: Adhesive ConnectorFigure 9: Magnitude of DisplacementApply boundary conditionsNodes on extreme right face of the blue plate are selected, andconstrain their all degrees of freedom with a zero value. Thisconstrain comes under SPC load collector. Then select theNow following are the images which displaying the results forthe elemental stresses obtained at joint consisting of simpleVon Mises stresses in Figure 10 and simple maximum shearstresses in Figure 11.608

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.comInternational Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and ArchitectureFigure 10: Simple Von Mises StressesFigure 12: Load Vs Stress Plot for MS-MS JointTable 3: Load & Stress Values for AL to AL jointTrialNo.12345678910Figure 11: Maximum Shear StressesFEA ResultsAbove procedure is repeated for different loads at adhesivethickness of 1mm and determine the respective stresses. Thevalues obtained by analysis are entered into Table 2. Thegraph showing relation between load applied and stressesinduced is shown in Figure 12 for MS-MS joint havingadhesive thickness of 1mm.As per Juliade Castro San Roman, mentioned in his technicalreport CCLab2000.1b/2 on “Experiments on Double LapJoints with EP, PU & ADP Adhesives”, the Epoxy adhesivesoffer a tensile strength of 38.1 2.6 MPa.The FEA process is also repeated for different materialcombinations of metal plates used and the load applied isvaried to determine the different stress values. The values arethen entered into a tabular form and plot a graph for eachtable. Table 3 and Table 4 are for AL to AL and MS to ALjoint respectively, while they are presented in graphs byFigure13 and Figure 14.Load Appliedin 80Elemental Stress in MPaVon MisesMax 21.63Figure13: Load Vs Stress Plot for AL-AL JointTable 2: Load & Stress Values for MS to MS jointTrialNo.12345678910Load Appliedin 80Table 4: Load & Stress Values for MS to AL jointElemental Stress in MPaVon MisesMax 20.69TrialNo.12345678910609Load Appliedin 80Elemental Stress in MPaVon MisesMax 21.18

International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. ISSN 0974-3154 Volume 10, Number 1 (2017) International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.comInternational Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and ArchitectureConclusionFollowing conclusions are drawn from the analysis of thecase study.1. It is found from the analysis that, for the same adhesivethickness and material properties the stress induced isdirectly proportional to the load applied.2. As stress induced has negative effect on the joint strength,the strength of the joint is decreased with the increase inthe applied load.3. More is the soft material of the metal plates; less is theadherence between adhesive and plate and simultaneouslymaximum are the elemental stresses induced in that jointand adhesive.4. It is observed that the finite FEA predictions for VonMises stresses and maximum shear stresses are differentfor different material combinations, which indicates directproportion between modulus of elasticity and strength ofthe joint.5. The Von Mises stresses and maximum shear stressesobtained at the same load for MS-MS joint are less ascompared to MS-AL and AL-AL joint, thus MS-MS jointis strongest bond out of three material combinations. Whilefor AL-AL joint the stresses induced are maximumtherefore this bond is weakest amongst the three materialcombinations.Figure 14: Load Vs Stress Plot for MS-AL JointComparison of ResultsFinally the FEA results for different material combinations arecompared with each other. The Von Mises stresses obtainedfor these combinations are plotted on a graph in Figure 15 andmaximum shear stresses are plotted on a graph shown inFigure 16. The values for these graphs are taken from Table 2to Table 5.REFERENCES[1] Andreas O chsner, Michal Stasiek, Gennady Mishuris,Jose Gra cio; “A new evaluation procedure for the buttjoint test of adhesive Technology : Determi-nation of thecomplete set of linear elastic constants”; InternationalJournal of Adhesion & Adhesives 27 (2007) 703–711.[2] Gre gory Bresson, Julien Jumel, Martin E.R. Shanahan,Pierre Serin; “Strength of adhesively bonded joints undermixed axial and shear loading”; International Journal ofAdhesion & Adhesives 35 (2012) 27–35.[3] Kimiyoshi Naito, Mutsumi Onta, Yasuo Kogo; “Theeffect of adhesive thickness on tensile and shear strengthof polyimide adhesive”; International Journal ofAdhesion & Adhesives 36 (2012) 77–85.[4] Xiaozhou Wang , Jun Wang, HaoWang; “Performanceand structural evolution of high-temperature organicadhesive for joining Al2O3 ceramics”; InternationalJournal of Adhesion & Adhesives 45 (2013) 1–6.[5] Mohd Afendi , M. S. Abdul Majid, Ruslizam Daud,A.Abdul Rahman, Tokuo Teramoto; “Strength predictionand reliability of brittle epoxy adhesively bondeddissimilar joint”; International Journal of Adhesion &Adhesives 45 (2013)21–31.[6] D. Thevenet, R. Creachcadec, L. Sohier, J. Y. Cognard;“Experimental analysis of the behavior of adhesivelybonded joints under tensile/ compression-shear cyclicloading”; International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives47 (2013) 15–25.[7] Juliade Castro San Roman, A technical report“CCLab2000.1b/2” on “Experiments on Double LapJoints with EP, PU & ADP Adhesives”.Figure15: Von Mises Stresses Comparison PlotFigure 16: Maximum Shear Stresses Comparison Plot610

Dr. Vivek V. Kulkarni . Professor & Dean Academics, Mechanical Engineering Department . Sanjay Ghodawat Group of Institutions, Atigre, Kolhapur, India . Abstract . Majority of automobile and aerospace parts, mainly their body components are joined together by different types of ad

Related Documents:

Finite element analysis DNV GL AS 1.7 Finite element types All calculation methods described in this class guideline are based on linear finite element analysis of three dimensional structural models. The general types of finite elements to be used in the finite element analysis are given in Table 2. Table 2 Types of finite element Type of .

Figure 3.5. Baseline finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-8 Figure 3.6. Baseline finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.7. Baseline finite element mesh for F-15 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.8. Uniform bias finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-14 Figure 3.9. Uniform bias finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-15 Figure 3.10.

1 Overview of Finite Element Method 3 1.1 Basic Concept 3 1.2 Historical Background 3 1.3 General Applicability of the Method 7 1.4 Engineering Applications of the Finite Element Method 10 1.5 General Description of the Finite Element Method 10 1.6 Comparison of Finite Element Method with Other Methods of Analysis

2.7 The solution of the finite element equation 35 2.8 Time for solution 37 2.9 The finite element software systems 37 2.9.1 Selection of the finite element softwaresystem 38 2.9.2 Training 38 2.9.3 LUSAS finite element system 39 CHAPTER 3: THEORETICAL PREDICTION OF THE DESIGN ANALYSIS OF THE HYDRAULIC PRESS MACHINE 3.1 Introduction 52

Finite Element Method Partial Differential Equations arise in the mathematical modelling of many engineering problems Analytical solution or exact solution is very complicated Alternative: Numerical Solution – Finite element method, finite difference method, finite volume method, boundary element method, discrete element method, etc. 9

3.2 Finite Element Equations 23 3.3 Stiffness Matrix of a Triangular Element 26 3.4 Assembly of the Global Equation System 27 3.5 Example of the Global Matrix Assembly 29 Problems 30 4 Finite Element Program 33 4.1 Object-oriented Approach to Finite Element Programming 33 4.2 Requirements for the Finite Element Application 34 4.2.1 Overall .

The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis by T. J. R. Hughes, Dover Publications, 2000 The Finite Element Method Vol. 2 Solid Mechanics by O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor, Oxford : Butterworth Heinemann, 2000 Institute of Structural Engineering Method of Finite Elements II 2

Nonlinear Finite Element Method Lecture Schedule 1. 10/ 4 Finite element analysis in boundary value problems and the differential equations 2. 10/18 Finite element analysis in linear elastic body 3. 10/25 Isoparametric solid element (program) 4. 11/ 1 Numerical solution and boundary condition processing for system of linear