A320 Family/ Evolution Of Ground Spoiler Logic

3y ago
48 Views
3 Downloads
766.79 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 22d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Halle Mcleod
Transcription

Stéphane BOISSENINElisabeth SALAVYEngineer, Handling QualitiesEngineeringEngineer, Flight Control SystemsEngineeringA320 Family/Evolution of groundspoiler logic2. Current groundspoiler extensionconditions1. IntroductionGround spoilers reduce the liftproduced by the wings and hencetransfer the weight of the aircraftto the landing gear, allowinga more effective wheel brakingaction.Their non or untimely extensionhas been a factor in the followingtypes of A320 Family events:q The absence of spoiler exten-sion contributed to increase thestopping distance during landing.q The untimely spoiler extension2.1. Full extensionDepending on whether the groundspoilers have been armed or not, thefollowing conditions must be metfor their full automatic extension(as outlined in FCOM 1.27.10 p12):q Ground spoilers armed (fig. 1) Both main landing gears seenon ground. Both thrust levers at or belowIdle notch (fig. 2).This modification applies to thecomplete as well as to the partialground spoiler extension.It was achieved by creating anew standard of Spoiler Elevator Computer (SEC), which isin charge of spoiler control, theSEC standard 120.This article will describe:q The current ground spoilerextension conditions.contributed to a number of hardlandings.q The identified causes of run-In both cases, the cause couldbe traced back to non arming ofthe ground spoilers and/or inappropriate thrust levers positionsduring the flare.q How the new SEC standardway excursion and hard landings.will reduce the number of theseoccurrences.Figure 1Figure 2ArmedTo reduce the frequency of theseevents, Airbus has modified thespoiler extension logic.The new logic is now tolerant toinappropriate speed brake and/orthrust levers positions.Safety first #09 February 2010 - 1/5

Safetyq Ground spoilers not armed (fig. 3) Both main landing gears seenon ground. Reverse is selected on at least oneengine (the other thrust lever mustbe at or below Idle notch, fig. 4).2.2 Partial extensionThe Phased Lift Dumping functionallows the ground spoilers to deploywith a reduced deflection and servesto accelerate the full spoiler extension when landing in crosswind conditions or on contaminated runways.The necessary conditions to triggerthe partial ground spoiler extension, independently of the positionof the ground spoiler lever are:q One main landing gear seen onground.q Reverse is selected on at leastone engine (the other thrust levermust be at or below Idle notch).3. In-serviceevents3.2. Hard landingsAmong hard landings, one specificcategory has been identified whereby the hard landing occurred aftera bounce. They fit to the followingscenario (fig. 7):q e No engine throttle reduction (retard) during the flare p Noground spoiler extension.q r Bounce induced by a too highenergy level and by the lack of liftdestruction.q t Enginethrottlereductionperformed during the bouncep Ground spoiler extension ifthe retard is performed within3 seconds following the firsttouchdown.q u Severe hard landing due tosudden loss of lift leading to a fallfrom a height of about 5ft to 15 ft.It has been established that most ofthe hard landings occurring after abounce are severe.Not ArmedFigure 3Figure 4Full ground spoilerextentionThe genesis of this flight controlcomputer modification is comingfrom two types of events:Figure 5The ground spoilerswere not armedFigure 6The spoilers could notextend3.1. Longitudinal runwayexcursionRunway excursions resulted fromthe spoilers not extending duringthe landing.This was traced to the followingtwo causes:q The speed brake lever was in anon retracted position (fig. 5).q One engine throttle was not inthe area that authorized groundspoiler extension (fig. 6).2Figure 7314Safety first #09 February 2010 - 2/5

4. Expandedground spoilerextensionconditions4.1. General philosophyThe Airbus philosophy regardingthe ground spoiler activation logicis still based on the achievement ofthe following three conditions:q  Armingq  Ground detectionq  Thrust lever positionThe arming and thrust leverposition conditions have been expanded to be more tolerant to inappropriate speed brake and thrustlever positions.The ground detection condition hasbeen expanded as well, albeit onlyfor the partial ground spoiler extension, to address failures of grounddetection sensors.Figure 8Expanded groundspoiler armingcondition based onmore tolerant speedbrake lever position.Figure 9Figure 10Expanded groundspoiler extensioncondition based onmore tolerant thrustlever position4.2. Changes introduced to limitrunway excursionsThe changes introduced by the newSEC 120 standard are highlightedin bold.Complete ground spoiler extensionconditionsq Ground spoilers armed or speedbrake lever in non retracted position(fig. 8). Both main landing gears seenon ground. Both thrust levers at or belowIdle notch or Reverse is selected on at least one engine (theother thrust lever must be below the Maximum Continuous- MCT- notch).1Figure 112q  Ground spoilers not armed (fig. 9) Both main landing gears seenon ground. Reverse is selected on atleast one engine (the otherthrust lever must be below theMaximum Continuous - MCT notch, fig. 10).Partial ground spoiler extensionconditionsThe partial ground spoiler extension conditions have been expanded to mirror the full spoiler extension conditions.q Ground spoilers armed or speedbrake lever in non retracted position One main landing gear seenon ground. Both thrust levers at or belowIdle notch.q Ground spoilers not armed One main landing gear seenon ground. Reverse is selected on atleast one engine (the otherthrust lever must be below theMaximum Continuous - MCT notch).noteAll combinations that would triggerthe full ground spoiler extensionhide the partial ground spoilerextension.4.3. Changes introduced to limitbounces at landingA new spoiler extension logic isproposed on the SEC 120 to minimize the magnitude of the bouncein the event of an inappropriatethrust lever position during the flare.34Safety first #09 February 2010 - 3/5

SafetyThis logic provides some lift destruction through the partial extension of ground spoilers as soon asground conditions are detected onboth landing gears, as long as boththrust levers are at or below theClimb notch (ATHR).5. ConclusionNew ground spoiler partial extension conditions:Expansion of the ground spoilerextension conditions means thatthe spoilers will extend evenwhen the speed brake and/orthrust levers are in inappropriatepositions, thereby improving theaircraft’sdecelerationonground.q  Ground spoilers armed.q  Both main landing gears seenon ground.q  Both thrust levers at or belowthe Climb notch (ATHR).Landing scenario with SEC 120(fig. 11):q e No engine throttle reduc-tion (retard) during the flare p Noground spoiler extension.q r With the SEC 120 modifi cation, the ground spoilers willextend partially at touchdown, aslong as both engines levers are ator below the Climb notch (ATHR).Lift is decreased and the bounce isreduced or cancelled.q t As soon as the thrust leverconditions are fulfilled (for instance engine throttle reductionto Idle), the ground spoilers extend fully (if achieved within 3seconds of the initial touchdown).AnnexeHard landing effect followingbounce is reduced by 50%.Runway excursion and hardlanding events have promptedAirbus to develop a new standard of Spoiler Elevator Computer, the SEC 120.The modification proposed to reducebounce occurrences at landing has beenvalidated using a back to back approach.A dozen of major hard landingoccurrences following a bounce havebeen simulated with Airbus flightdynamics simulations tools with andwithout the partial ground spoilerextension at touchdown.Without the partial spoiler extension atthe first touchdown, the average verticalload factor at the second touchdown isabout 3.2g.With the SEC 120 modification allowingpartial ground spoiler extension onground even with thrust levers on Climb(ATHR) notch, the average load factor atthe second touchdown is reducedto about 1.7g.In addition, a new ground spoilerpartial extension logic has beendeveloped to limit bounces thatmay lead to hard landings.To summarize, the SEC standard120 provides means to reduce:q Runway excursions by enabling: Arming of the ground spoilers even when the speed brakelever is not retracted. Extension of the ground spoilers even with a thrustlever above the Idle position.q Hard landings by minimizing: The number and amplitude of bounces by triggeringpartial spoiler extension attouchdown even with boththrust levers in the ATHRposition.Example of typicalhard landing eventNZ F(TIME) - Vertical load factor[g]4.03.53.02.52.01.51.00.51st touch2nd touch3.57gbounce1.78g4041424344Before SEC 120454647484950SEC 120Hard landings statisticalbreakdownq u As the height of the bounceis significantly reduced, the vertical speed at the second touchdown is largely reduced as well.Computer hardwareModification numberService Bulletin numberB15047127-1198B’15085727-1201The SEC 120 will become production standard on A320 Family fromMSN 4472 on.A statistical analysis has revealed thata significant bounce (Nz 1.6g) occursin about 50% of the hard landing events.In about half of those cases (i.e. 25% ofall hard landings), the second impact isharder than the first one.More globally, the ground spoilerextension during a bounce has beenidentified as the root cause of the hardlanding in 15% to 20% of the cases.Moreover, those events also represent40% of the cases with costly issues(aircraft grounded, structural damages,landing gear changes ).Safety first #09 February 2010 - 4/5

SafetySafety FirstThe Airbus Safety MagazineFor the enhancement of safe flight throughincreased knowledge and communicationsSafety First is published by theFlight Safety Department of Airbus. It is a source of specialist safety information for the restricted useof flight and ground crew memberswho fly and maintain Airbus aircraft. It is also distributed to otherselected organisations.Material for publication isobtained from multiple sourcesand includes selected information from the Airbus Flight SafetyConfidential Reporting System,incident and accident investigation reports, system tests andflight tests. Material is also obtained from sources within theairline industry, studies and reports from government agenciesand other aviation sources.A380Serial Number 004cold weather trialsin Iqaluit, Nunavut,Canada.All articles in Safety First are presented for information only and are notintended to replace ICAO guidelines,standards or recommended practices,operator-mandated requirements ortechnical orders. The contents do notsupersede any requirements mandatedby the State of Registry of the Operator’s aircraft or supersede or amendany Airbus type-specific AFM, AMM,FCOM, MEL documentation or anyother approved documentation.Articles may be reprinted withoutpermission, except where copyright source is indicated, but withacknowledgement to Airbus. WhereAirbus is not the author, the contents of the article do not necessarilyreflect the views of Airbus, neitherdo they indicate Company policy.Contributions, comment and feedback are welcome. For technicalreasons the editors may be required tomake editorial changes to manuscripts, however every effort willbe made to preserve the intendedmeaning of the original. Enquiriesrelated to this publication shouldbe addressed to:AirbusProduct Safety department (GS)1, rond point Maurice Bellonte31707 Blagnac Cedex - FranceFax: 33(0)5 61 93 44 29safetycommunication@airbus.com Airbus S.A.S. 2010 – All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary documents.By taking delivery of this Brochure (hereafter “Brochure”), you accept on behalf of your company tocomply with the following guidelines:3 No other intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this Brochure than the right to readit, for the sole purpose of information.3 This Brochure and its content shall not be modified and its illustrations and photos shall not be reproduced without prior written consent of Airbus.Safety First, #09 February 2010. Safety First ispublished by Airbus S.A.S. 1, rond point MauriceBellonte. 31707 Blagnac Cedex/France. Editor:Yannick Malinge, Vice President Flight Safety,Nils Fayaud, Director Product Safety Information.Concept Design by Airbus Multi Media SupportRef. 20100055. Computer Graphic by Quat’coul.Copyright: GSE 420.0010/10 Photos copyrightAirbus. Photos by ExM Company: H. Berenger, P.Masclet, H. Goussé. Computer rendering by AbacEffect. Printed in France by Airbus Print Centre.3 This Brochure and the materials it contains shall not, in whole or in part, be sold, rented, or licensedto any third party subject to payment.This Brochure contains sensitive information that is correct at the time of going to press.This information involves a number of factors that could change over time, effecting the true publicrepresentation. Airbus assumes no obligation to update any information contained in this document orwith respect to the information described herein.Airbus S.A.S. shall assume no liability for any damage in connection with the use of this Brochure andof the materials it contains, even if Airbus S.A.S. has been advised of the likelihood of such damages.Safety first #09 February 2010 - 5/5

A320 Family/ Evolution of ground spoiler logic 2. Current ground spoiler extension conditions 2.1. Full extension Depending on whether the ground spoilers have been armed or not, the following conditions must be met for their full automatic extension (as outlined in FCOM 1.27.10 p12): q Ground spoilers armed (fig. 1)

Related Documents:

Most of the tailstrikes on A320 family aircraft occur during landing in manual mode (Auto Pilot OFF), when the sidestick is maintained in the aft position after touch down (Fig1). The importance of this subject is obviously correlated to the fuselage length. It is, therefore, particularly important to A320 and A321 operators. A318 A319 A320 A321

Airbus A320 Family Non-Normal Notes Airbus A320 Family Non-Normal Notes: Ver-sion 2.6

To ease the reading of some Notes in the limitations table (SECTION 4) and to limit the numbers of different applicability expressions, for certain configurations, A320 FAMILY ALS Part 1 configuration groups have been established. The below table gives the configuration or modification expression valid for an A320 FAMILY

A340 Family JAA JOEB report – June 2003 A380 EASA OEB report FCL/OPS – 18 July 2011 A320 – A330 – A340 CCQ – MFF JAA JOEB report – 12 March 2004 MMELs A300,A310,A320, A330, A340, A380 A380 EASA OEB Cabin Crew – 22 August 2007 Soon to be published A320 –A330-A340 Cabin Crew OEB report.

FCA A318/A319/A320/A321 FLEET PLP-LOM. P 1/2 FCTM 08 JUL 08. A318/A319/A320/A321 FLIGHT CREW TRAINING MANUAL PRELIMINARY PAGES LIST OF MODIFICATIONS M MODIFICATION Linked SB Incorp. Date . the FCOM. In the case of any conflict, the FCOM is the over-riding authority. Airline training policy may differ in certain areas. Should this be the case .

Airbus, ST Aerospace and EFW have extended their strategic partnership and launched the development of the OEM supported A320 P2F/A321 P2F. The A321P2F will enter service in 2018 followed by the A320P2F in 2019. The A320/A321 P2F will play a key role in the single aisle freighter segment and will complement the medium-size A330F and A330P2F .

which are 10 Airbus A320-200, 4 Airbus A321-200, 7 Airbus A330-200 and 3 Airbus A330-300. In our package you ll find the modern fleet of an: Airbus A320-200 and Airbus A321-200. To select one of these aircraft go to „Select Aircraft“. From the list „Aircraft manufacturer“ choose the entry „AIRBUS BY AEROSOFT“. TheFile Size: 1MBPage Count: 35

study of p-rough paths and their collection is done in the second part of the course. Guided by the results on flows of the first part, we shall reinterpret equation (0.4) to construct directly a flow ϕsolution to the equation (0.6) dϕ F X(dt), in a sense to be made precise in the third part of the course. The recipe of construction of ϕwill consist in associating to F and X a C1 .