AnIntroductionto FunctionalGrammarT H I R DE D I T I O N
This page intentionally left blank
AnIntroductionto FunctionalGrammarT H I R DE D I T I O NM.A.K. HallidayEmeritus Professor of LinguisticsUniversity of Sydney, AustraliaRevised by Christian M.I.M. MatthiessenProfessor of LinguisticsMacquarie University, AustraliaHodder ArnoldA MEMBER OF THE HODDER HEADLINE GROUP
First published in Great Britain in 2004 byArnold, a member of the Hodder Headline Group,338 Euston Road, London NW1 3BHhttp://www.hoddereducation.comDistributed in the United States of America byOxford University Press Inc.198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY10016 2004 M.A.K. Halliday and Christian MatthiessenAll rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced ortransmitted in any form or by any means, electronically or mechanically,including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrievalsystem, without either prior permission in writing from the publisher or alicence permitting restricted copying. In the United Kingdom such licencesare issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency: Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street,London EC1N 8TS.The advice and information in this book are believed to be true andaccurate at the date of going to press, but neither the authors nor the publishercan accept any legal responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions.British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British LibraryLibrary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataA catalog record for this book is available from the Library of CongressISBN-10: 0 340 76167 9ISBN-13: 978 0 340 76167 03 4 5 6 7 8 9 10Typeset in 10 on 12.5pt Berling by Phoenix Photosetting, Chatham, KentPrinted and bound in IndiaWhat do you think about this book? Or any other Hodder Arnold title?Please send your comments to www.hoddereducation.com
ContentsPrefacePart IixThe Clause1 The220.127.116.11.41architecture of language 3Text and grammar 3Phonology and grammar 11Basic concepts for the study of language 19The location of grammar in language; the role of the corpus2 Towards a functional grammar 372.1 Towards a grammatical analysis 372.2 The lexico-grammar cline 432.3 Grammaticalization 462.4 Grammar and the corpus 482.5 Classes and functions 502.6 Subject, Actor, Theme 532.7 Three lines of meaning in the clause31583 Clause as message 643.1 Theme and Rheme 643.2 Group or phrase complexes as Theme; thematic equatives3.3 Theme and mood 713.4 Textual, interpersonal and topical Themes 793.5 The information unit; Given New 873.6 Given New and Theme Rheme 933.7 Predicated Themes 953.8 Theme in bound, minor and elliptical clauses 983.9 Thematic interpretation of a text 10068
CONTENTS4 Clause as exchange 1064.1 The nature of dialogue 1064.2 The Mood element 1114.3 Other elements of Mood structure 1214.4 MOOD as system; further options 1344.5 Polarity and modality 1434.6 Absence of elements of the modal structure4.7 Clause as Subject 1544.8 Texts 1581515 Clause as representation 1685.1 Modelling experience of change 1685.2 Material clauses: processes of doing-and-happening 1795.3 Mental clauses: processes of sensing 1975.4 Relational clauses: processes of being and having 2105.5 Other process types: summary of process types 2485.6 Circumstantial elements 2595.7 Transitivity and voice: another interpretation 2805.8 Text illustrations 303Part IIAbove, Below and Beyond the Clause3076 Below the clause: groups and phrases 3096.1 Groups and phrases 3096.2 Nominal group 3116.3 Verbal group 3356.4 Adverbial group, conjunction group, preposition group6.5 Prepositional phrase 3596.6 Word classes and group functions 3613547 Above the clause: the clause complex 3637.1 The notion of ‘clause complex’ 3637.2 Types of relationship between clauses 3737.3 TAXIS: parataxis and hypotaxis 3837.4 Elaborating, extending, enhancing: three kinds of expansion7.5 Reports, ideas and facts: three kinds of projection 4417.6 Clause complex and tone 4827.7 Texts 4848 Group and phrase complexes 4868.1 Overview of complexing at group or phrase rank 4868.2 Parataxis: groups and phrases 4898.3 Hypotaxis: nominal group 4938.4 Hypotaxis: adverbial group or prepositional phrase 4958.5 Hypotaxis: verbal group, expansion (1): general 497vi395
Contents18.104.22.168.9Hypotaxis: verbal group, expansion (2): passives 505Hypotaxis: verbal group, expansion (3): causative 509Hypotaxis: verbal group, projection 515Logical organization: complexes at clause and group or phrase rank, andgroups 5219 Around the clause: cohesion and discourse 5249.1 The concept of text; logogenetic patterns 5249.2 The lexicogrammatical resources of COHESION9.3 Conjunction 5389.4 Reference 5499.5 Ellipsis and substitution 5619.6 Lexical cohesion 5709.7 The creation of texture 57953210 Beyond the clause: metaphorical modes of expression 58610.1 Lexicogrammar and semantics 58610.2 Semantic domains 59310.3 Modality 61310.4 Interpersonal metaphor: metaphors of mood 62610.5 Ideational metaphors 636ReferencesIndex659667vii
This page intentionally left blank
prefaceEarly in the new millennium, after the second edition of IFG had been on salefor some ﬁve or six years, I was asked by the publishers: would I like toconsider making some further revisions and preparing a third edition? I feltrather daunted by this prospect. I had worked very readily on IFG2, becausethere were features of the original which clearly needed revising, and I hadsome of the material already in hand. But this time, while there was no doubtthat the book could be further updated and improved, I was not sure that Ihad the necessary energy or expertise to undertake an IFG3.The obvious solution was to work in collaboration; and the obvious personto collaborate with was Christian Matthiessen, if he was willing and if he couldﬁnd the time. He was; and he did.In the event, while I contributed a few sections to the revision, the lion’sshare of the work was taken on by Christian. The result is some way betweena revision and a new book. More prominence has been given to the systemnetworks which underpin the grammar; and there are many more textexamples, because the systemic functional model has been widely used in theanalysis of discourse. Inevitably, therefore, the book has become rather longerthan it was before. I hope this has not made it excessively recalcitrant tohandle! It is still (as I said of the ﬁrst edition) a short introduction, given therichness and complexity of what it is introducing — the grammar of a humanlanguage.M.A.K. HallidayThe ﬁrst chapter has been largely rewritten, beginning with the motif of usinga grammar to analyse text, and then introducing the fundamental theoreticalconcepts that make up the ‘architecture’ of a language: axis, stratiﬁcation,instantiation, metafunction, composition. The notion of constituency(syntagmatic composition), previously used as the way into the grammar, is
PREFACEhere given less prominence. Chapters 3 and 4 have been tidied up and extended; andChapter 5 has been considerably rewritten, in order to make the very complex aspects oftransitivity more accessible and to provide more support for text analysis. Chapter 7 hasbeen extensively revised, with more material on the relationship between the clausecomplex and the rhetorical-relational organization of text; and what was ‘Chapter 7additional’ has become Chapter 8, because Chapter 8 in its original form has disappeared,the content being incorporated into the chapters to which it is related (Chapters 1, 3, 4 and7). Chapter 9 is still concerned with cohesion, but it has been expanded to include adiscussion of instantial patterns in general in text and the presentation of the subsystems ofcohesion has been reorganized so that it now starts with conjunction in order to foregroundthe link to clause complexing in the grammar and rhetorical-relational organization in thediscourse semantics.Throughout the chapters we have tried, within the space available, to provide a sense ofhow the grammar makes meaning in written and spoken text, illustrating the distinctivecontributions made by the different options within a given system. This is one step in thedirection of ﬂeshing out the relationship between grammar and discourse semantics; buttexts inevitably take up a good deal of space, and we have had to remove a number ofexamples we had originally included. These will ﬁnd their way into other publications, orbe added to a new website that we are designing as a companion to IFG.This web companion to IFG will enable us to make available certain material from IFG2that we were not able to include in this new edition. But it will also offer new material,including more text examples (spoken as well as written) and more discussion of particularpoints.M.A.K. Halliday & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessenx
part Ithe clause
This page intentionally left blank
chapteroneTHE ARCHITECTURE OF LANGUAGE1.1 Text and grammarWhen people speak or write, they produce text. The term ‘text’ refers to anyinstance of language, in any medium, that makes sense to someone whoknows the language (cf. Halliday and Hasan, 1976: Chapter 1). To agrammarian, text is a rich, many-faceted phenomenon that ‘means’ in manydifferent ways. It can be explored from many different points of view. Butwe can distinguish two main angles of vision: one, focus on the text as anobject in its own right; two, focus on the text as an instrument for ﬁndingout about something else. Focusing on text as an object, a grammarian willbe asking questions such as: Why does the text mean what it does (to me, orto anyone else)? Why is it valued as it is? Focusing on text as instrument, thegrammarian will be asking what the text reveals about the system of thelanguage in which it is spoken or written. These two perspectives are clearlycomplementary: we cannot explain why a text means what it does, with allthe various readings and values that may be given to it, except by relating itto the linguistic system as a whole; and equally, we cannot use it as awindow on the system unless we understand what it means and why. But thetext has a different status in each case: either viewed as artefact, or elseviewed as specimen.The text itself may be lasting or ephemeral, momentous or trivial,memorable or soon forgotten. Here are three examples of text in English.Text 1-1Today all of us do, by our presence here, and by our celebrations in other parts of ourcountry and the world, confer glory and hope to newborn liberty.Out of the experience of an extraordinary human disaster that lasted too long, must be borna society of which all humanity will be proud. Our daily deeds as ordinary South Africansmust produce an actual South African reality that will reinforce humanity’s belief in justice,
THE ARCHITECTURE OF LANGUAGEstrengthen its conﬁdence in the nobility of the human soul and sustain all our hopes for a glorious lifefor all.All this we owe both to ourselves and to the peoples of the world who are so well represented here today.Text 1-2Cold power is the ideal brand for any family.We understand that there is more than one thing you want to achieve out of every wash load.As such, we have developed a formula capable of achieving a wide range of beneﬁts for all types of washloads.Text 1-3‘And we’ve been trying different places around the island that — em, a couple of years ago we got on to thisplace called the Surai in East Bali and we just go back there now every time. It is —’‘Oh I’ve heard about this.’‘Have you heard about it? Oh.’‘Friends have been there.’‘It is the most wonderful wonderful place. Fabulous.’Text 1-3 was a spontaneous spoken text, which we are able to transpose into writingbecause it was recorded on audio tape. Text 1-2 is a written text, which we could (if wewanted to) read aloud. Text 1-1 is more complex: it was probably composed in writing,perhaps with some spoken rehearsal; but it was written in order to be spoken, and to bespoken on an all-important public occasion (Nelson Mandela’s inaugural speech asPresident, 10 May 1994).When grammarians say that from their point of view all texts are equal, they arethinking of them as specimens. If we are interested in explaining the grammar of English,all these three texts illustrate numerous grammatical features of the language, inmeaningful functional contexts, all equally needing to be taken into account. Seen asartefacts, on the other hand, these texts are far from equal. Text 1-1 constituted animportant moment in modern human history, and may have left its imprint on thelanguage in a way that only a very few highly-valued texts are destined to do. But here,too, there is a complementarity. Text 1-1 has value because we also understand texts like1-2 and 1-3; not that we compare them, of course, but that each text gets its meaning byselecting from the same meaning-making resources. What distinguishes any one text is theway these resources are deployed.Our aim in this book has been to describe and explain the meaning-making resources ofmodern English, going as far in detail as is possible within one medium-sized volume.When deciding what parts of the grammar to cover, and how far to go in discussion oftheory, we have had in mind those who want to use their understanding of grammar inanalysing and interpreting texts. This in turn means recognizing that the contexts for4
Text and grammaranalysis of discourse are numerous and varied — educational, social, literary, political,legal, clinical and so on; and in all these the text may be being analysed as specimen or asartefact, or both (specimen here might mean specimen of a particular functional variety,or register, such as ‘legal English’). What is common to all these pursuits is that theyshould be grounded in an account of the grammar that is coherent, comprehensive andrichly dimensioned. To say this is no more than to suggest that the grammatics — themodel of grammar — should be as rich as the grammar itself (Halliday, 1984b; 1996). Ifthe account seems complex, this is because the grammar is complex — it has to be, to doall the things we make it do for us. It does no service to anyone in the long run if wepretend that semiosis — the making and understanding of meaning — is a simpler matterthan it really is.1.1.1 Constituency: (1) phonologicalPerhaps the most noticeable dimension of language is its compositional structure, known as‘constituency’. If we listen to any of these texts — to any text, in fact — in its spoken formwe will hear continuous melody with rising and falling pitch, and with certain moments ofprominence marked by either relatively rapid pitch changes or extended pitch intervals.These moments of prominence deﬁne a snatch of melody — a melodic unit, or line; andwithin this melodic progression we will be able to pick up a more or less regular beat,deﬁning some rhythmic unit, or foot. We can perhaps recognize that the ‘line’ and the ‘foot’of our traditional verse metres are simply regularized versions of these properties ofordinary speech.Each foot, in turn, is made up of a number of syllables; and each syllable is composed oftwo parts, one of which enables it to rhyme. We refer to this rhyming segment, simply, asthe rhyme; the preceding segment to which it is attached is called the onset. Both onset andrhyme can be further analysed as sequences of consonants and vowels: consonant and vowelphonemes, in technical parlance.The stretch of speech is continuous; we stop and pause for breath from time to time, orhesitate before an uncertain choice of word, but such pauses play no part in the overallconstruction. None of these units — melodic line (or ‘tone group’), foot (or ‘rhythmgroup’), syllable or phoneme — has clearly identiﬁable boundaries, some deﬁnite point intime where it begins and ends. Nevertheless, we can hear the patterns that are beingcreated by the spoken voice. There is a form of order here that we can call constituency,whereby larger units are made up out of smaller ones: a line out of feet; a foot out ofsyllables; a syllable out of sequences of phonemes (perhaps with ‘sub-syllable’intermediate between the two). We refer to such a hierarchy of units, related byconstituency, as a rank scale, and to each step in the hierarchy as one rank (cf. Halliday,1961).What we have been setting up here is the rank scale for the sound system of English:the phonological rank scale. Every language has some rank scale of phonologicalconstituents, but with considerable variation in how the constituency is organized (cf.Halliday, 1992c, on Mandarin): in the construction of syllables, in the rhythmic andmelodic patterns, and in the way the different variables are integrated into a functioningwhole. We get a good sense of the way the sounds of English are organized when weanalyse children’s verses, or ‘nursery rhymes’; these have evolved in such a way as to5
THE ARCHITECTURE OF LANGUAGEdisplay the patterns in their most regularized form. Little Miss Muffet can serve as anexample (Figure tleMissMuflineEatingherlinecamealinefrightenedFig. TheredownbesideherAndExample of phonological constituencyWe will say more about phonology in Section 1.2 below. Meanwhile, we turn to thenotion of constituency in writing.1.1.2 Constituency: (2) graphologicalAs writing systems evolved, they gradually came to model the constituent hierarchy ofspoken language, by developing a rank scale of their own. Thus, in modern English writing,we have the sentence (beginning with a capital letter and ending with a full stop), subsentence (bounded by some intermediate punctuation mark: colon, semicolon or comma),word (bounded by spaces) and letter. Figure 1-2 shows the same text written inorthographic conventional form.sentsentFig. r,subsentandfrightenedMissMuffetaway.Examples of graphological constituency* Versions of nursery rhymes are those given in Iona and Peter Opie, The Oxford Dictionary of NurseryRhymes.6
Text and grammarThe constituent structure is represented by a combination of spelling (combining lettersto form words) and punctuation (using special signs, and also the case of the letter, to signalboundaries; cf.Halliday, 1985). The system is more complex than we have illustrated here,in three respects: (1) word boundaries are somewhat fuzzy, and there is a specialpunctuation mark, the hyphen, brought in to allow for the uncertainty, for example, fryingpan, fryingpan, frying-pan; (2) there is a further rank in the hierarchy of sub-sentences, withcolon and semicolon representing a unit higher than that marked off by a comma; (3) thereis at least one rank above the sentence, namely the paragraph. These do not affect theprinciple of graphological constituency; but they raise the question of why these furtherorders of complexity evolved.The simple answer is: because writing is not the representation of speech sound.Although every writing system is related to the sound system of its language in systematicand non-random ways (exactly how the two are related varies from one language toanother), the relationship is not a direct one. There is another level of organization inlanguage to which both the sound system and the writing system are related, namely thelevel of wording, or ‘lexicogrammar’. (We shall usually refer to this simply as ‘grammar’,as in the title of the book; but it is important to clarify from the start that grammar andvocabulary are not two separate components of a language — they are just the two endsof a single continuum.) The sound system and the writing system are the two modes ofexpression by which the lexicogrammar of a language is represented, or
1.1 Text and grammar 3 1.2 Phonology and grammar 11 1.3 Basic concepts for the study of language 19 1.4 The location of grammar in language; the role of the corpus 31 2 Towards a functional grammar 37 2.1 Towards a grammatical analysis 37 2.2 The lexico-grammar cline 43 2.3 Grammaticalization 46 2.4 Grammar and the corpus 48 2.5 Classes and .
Grammar Express 79 Center Stage 79 Longman Advanced Learners’ Grammar 80 An Introduction to English Grammar 80 Longman Student Grammar of Spoken & Written English 80 Longman Grammar of Spoken & Written English 80 Grammar Correlation Chart KEY BOOK 1 BOOK 2 BOOK 3 BOOK 4 BOOK 5 BOOK 6 8. Grammar.indd 76 27/8/10 09:44:10
Introducing Functional Grammar Third edition Geoff Thompson \ R Routledge Taylor & Francis Group . 2.1.2 Structural and functional labels 18 2.2 Ranks 21 Exercises 26 . 10.2 A summary review of Functional Grammar 262 10.3 Using Functional Grammar * 264 10.4 Closing 266
functional linguistics, the ‘languages’ of systemic functional linguistics, lexical func-tional grammar, role and reference grammar,functional grammar, functional discourse grammar, cognitive linguistics etc.). Bernstein used the image of a triangle to represent the nature of knowled
IV Grammar/Comp Text ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 5.00 IV Grammar/Comp Text ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 5.00 Grammar/Composition IV ABeka Grammar 10th Grade 3.00 Workbook - Keys ABeka Grammar 12th Grade 10.00 Workbook VI-set ABeka Grammar 12th Grade 20.00 Daily Grams Gra
TURKISH GRAMMAR UPDATED ACADEMIC EDITION 2013 3 TURKISH GRAMMAR I FOREWORD The Turkish Grammar book that you have just started reading is quite different from the grammar books that you read in schools. This kind of Grammar is known as tradit ional grammar. The main differenc
Grammar is a part of learning a language. Grammar can be resulted by the process of teaching and learning. Students cannot learn grammar without giving grammar teaching before. Thornbury (1999) clarifies that grammar is a study of language to form sentences. In this respect, grammar has an important role in sentence construction both i.
2 Towards a functional grammar 37 2.1 Towards a grammatical analysis 37 2.2 The lexico-grammar cline 43 2.3 Grammaticalization 46 2.4 Grammar and the corpus 48 . examples, because the systemic functional model has been widely used in the analysis of discourse.
Anaesthetic Machine Anatomy O 2 flow-meter N 2 O flow-meter Link 22. Clinical Skills: 27 28 Vaporisers: This is situated on the back bar of the anaesthetic machine downstream of the flowmeter It contains the volatile liquid anaesthetic agent (e.g. isoflurane, sevoflurane). Gas is passed from the flowmeter through the vaporiser. The gas picks up vapour from the vaporiser to deliver to the .