Improved Finite Element Methodology For Integrated Thermal .

2y ago
38 Views
2 Downloads
4.19 MB
195 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Milo Davies
Transcription

NASA Contractor Report 3 6 3 5Improved Finite ElementMethodology for IntegratedThermal Structural AnalysisPramote Dechaumphai and Earl A. ThorntonGRANT NSG- 1 3 2 1NOVEMBER 1982

TECH LIBRARY KAFB. N MNASA Contractor Report 3 6 3 5Improved Finite ElementMethodology for IntegratedThermal Structural AnalysisPramote Dechaumphai and Earl A. ThorntonOld Dominion University Research FoundationNorfolk, VirginiaPrepared forLangley Research Centerunder Grant NSG- 1 32 1National Aeronauticsand Space AdministrationScientific and TechnicalInformation Branch1982

LIST OF SYMBOLSSurfaceabsorptivityCross sectional ure gradient interpolation matrixSpecific heatFinite element capacitance matrixFinite element damping matrixElasticitymatrixModulus of elasticityVector of body forcesFinite element nodal force vectorFinite element nodal thermal force vectorVector of surface tractionsConvective heat transfer yThermalconductivitymatrixmatrixFinite element conductance matrixFinite element stiffness matrixlengthFinite element lengthFluidmassflowrateiii

FiniteelementmassmatrixDirection cosines of surface normal vectorFinite element interpolation function matrixFinite element displacement interpolation functionmatrixFinite element temperature interpolation functionmatrixPPerimeterPerimeter for surface emitted energyPerimeter for surface incident energySurfaceheatingrateSurface incident radiation heating rateComponents of heatflowrateinCartesianVolusetric heat generation rateFinite element heat load vectorrRadial coordinateFinite element heat load vectortTimeTTemperatureTONodeless'reflieference temperature for zero ent componentsUInternal strain energyVPotential energyCartesian coordinatesVector of thermal expansion coefficientsVector of finite element displacementsivcoordinates

Chapter 1INTRODUCTIONThe finite element method is one ofmostthe significant develop-It was firstments for solving problems of continuum mechanics.applied by Turneret al. [lI* in 1956 for the analysis of complexaerospace structures. With increasing availability of digitalconputers, the method has become widespread and well recognized asapplicable to a variety of continuum problems. Applicationsof the1960'smethod to thermal problems were introducedin the middle offor the solution of steady-state conduction heat transfer[2].Thereafter, extensionsof the method were made to both transient andnonlinear analyses where nonlinearities may arise from temperaturedependent material properties and nonlinear boundary conditions.Important publications of finite element heat transfer analysisappear in references[3-121.With these developments and consider-able effort contributed during the past decade, the method hasgradually increased in thermal analysis capability and become apractical technique for analyzing realistic thermal problems.*Thenumbersinbracketsindicatereferences.

21.1 Current Status of Thermal-Structural onadvancedspace transportation vehicles are an important concern in structuraldesign. Nonuniform heating may havea significant effect on theperformance of the structures and efficient techniques for determiningthermal stresses are required. Frequently, the thermal analysis ofthe structure is performed by the finite difference method.Production-type finite difference programs such as MITASand SINDAhave demonstrated excellent capabilities for analyzing complexstructures [I31.In structural analysis, however, the finite elementmethod is favorable due to better capabilitiesin modeling complexstructural geometries and handling various types of boundary conditions. To perform coupled thermal-structural analysis with landstructuralanalysicodes is preferred, and a single numerical method is desirable toeliminate the tedious and perhaps expensive task of urrently, the capabilities and efficiency of the finite elementmethod i4 analyzing typical heat transfer problems such as combinedconduction-forced convection is about the same as using the finitedifference method [14]. With the wide acceptance of the finiteelement method in structures and its rapid growthin thermal analysis,it is particularly well-suited for coupled thermal-structuralanalysis.A t present, several finite element programs which includeboth thermal and structural analysis capabilities exist; e.g.NASTRAN, ANSYS, ADINA and SPAR are widely used. These programs use

3a common data base for transferring temperatures computed from aa structural analysis processor forthermal analysis processor todetermining displacements and stresses. With the use of a commonfinite element discretization, a significant reduction of effort nuallytransferring data between analyses is eliminated.1.,2 Needs for Improving Finite Element MethodologyAlthough the finite element method offers high potential forcoupled thermal-structural analysis, further improvements of themethod are needed. Quite often, the finite element thermal modelrequires a finer discretization than the structural model to computethe temperature distribution accurately. Detailed temperaturedistributions are necessary for the structural analysis to predictthermal stress distributions including critical stress locationsaccurately. Improvement of thermal finite elements is, therefore,required so that a common discretization between the two analyticalmodels can be maintained.Another need for improving the method includes a capability ofthe thermal analysis to produce thermal loads required for thestructural analysis directly. At present, typical thermal-structuralfinite element programs only transfer nodal temperatures computedfrom the thermal analysis to the structural analysis. These nodaltemperatures are generally inadequate because additional information,such as element temperature distributions and temperature gradients,may be required to compute thermal stress distributions correctly.

4These needs are important in improvement of finite elementcoupled thermal-structural analysis capability. The use of improvedthermal finite elements can reduce model size and computationalcosts especiallyfor analysis of complex aerospace vehicle structures.Improved thermal elements will also have a direct effect in increasingthe structural analysis accuracy through improving the accuracy.ofthermal loads.To meet these requirements for improved thermal-structuralanalysis and to demonstrate benefits that can be achieved, thisdissertation will develop an approach called integrated finiteelement thermal-structural analysis. First, basic concepts of theintegrated finite element thermal-structural formulation are introduced in Chapter2 .Finite elements which provide exact solutionsto one-dimensional linear steady-state thermal-structural problemsare developed in Chapter3 .Chapter 4 demonstrates the use of thesefinite elements for linear transient analysis. Next, in Chapter5a generalized approach for improved finite elements is establishedand its efficiencyis demonstrated through thermal-structuralanalysis with radiation heat transfer. Finally, in Chapter6extension of the approach to two dimensions is made with a new twodimensional finite element. In each chapter, benefits of utilizingthe improved finite elements are demonstrated by'both academic andrealistic thermal-structural problems.Throughout the developmentof the improved finite elements,detailed analytical and finite element formulations are presented.Such details are provided in the form of equations, finite elementmatrices in tables and computer subroutines in appendices.

Chapter 2ANINTEGRATED THERMAL-STRUCTURAL FINITEELEMENT FORMULATION2.1Basic ConceptsBefore applying the finite element method to thermal-structuralanalysis, it is appropriate to establish basic concepts and proceduresof the method. Briefly described, the finite element method is anumerical analysis technique for obtaining approximate solutions toproblems by idealizing the continuum model as a finite number ofdiscrete regions called elements. These elements are connected atIpoints called nodes where normally the dependent variables such astemperature and displacements are determined. Numerical computationsfor each individual element generate element matrices which are then(forassembled to form a set of linear algebraic equationssteady state problems) to represent the entire problem. Thesealgebraic equations are solved simultaneouslyf o r the unknowndependent variables. Usually the more elements used, the greaterthe accuracy of the results. Accuracy, however, can be affected byfactors such as the type of element selected to represent the continuum, and the sophistication of element interpolation functions.5

62.2 Element Interpolation FunctionsThe first step after replacing the continuum model by adiscrete number of finite elements is to determine a functionalrelationship between the dependent variable within the element andthe nodal variables. The function that represents the variation ofa dependent variable is called the interpolation function.In thermalanalysis, the element temperature T(x,y,z,t) are generally expressedin the formwhereLNT(x,y,z)jdenotes a row matrixof.the element temperatureinterpolation functions, and {T(t))denotes a vector of nodaltemperatures. Similarly, in a structural analysis, the elementdisplacements, { 6 ), are expressed as,where [NS(x,y,z)] denotes a matrixpolation functions, and {8(t) }of structural displacement inter-denotes a vector of nodaldisplacements.Usually, polynomials are selected as element interpolationfunctions and the degree of the polynomial chosen depends on thenumber of nodes assigned to the element. Regardless of the algebraicform, these interpolation functions have a value of unity at the nodto which it pertains and a value of zero at other nodes. For example,linear temperature variation for a two-node one-dimensional rod

7element with nodal temperaturesT2T1 andat x O (node 1) andx L (node 2 ) , respectively, canbe written in the formT(x,t)L1- yXBy comparing this equation with the generalform of the elementtemperature variation, Eq. (2.1), the element interpolation functionsareN1(x) 1- -LXandN2(x) cXThese element interpolation functions, therefore, have the propertiesof Ni 1at node i2.3andNi 0at the other node.Finite Element Thermal AnalysisOnce the type of elements and their interpolation functionshavebeen selected, the matrix equations expressing the propertiesof theindividual element are evaluated. In thermal analysis, the methodofweighted residuals 1151 is frequently employed starting from thegoverning differential equations. For condution heat transfer in athree-dimensional anisotropic solidRbounded by surface‘I(Fig. l), an energy balance on a small element is giver! by,where qx’ qy, 9,are components of the heat flow rate per unit’ area,Q is the internal heat generation rate per unit volume,Pis the

m4UET,RadHeat ‘I‘ran.sterAnF i g . 1.T h r e ed i m e n s i o n a lsolution domain f o rg e n e r a lheat conduction.

9density, and cis the specific heat. Using Fourier's Law, thecomponents of heat flow rate for an anisotropic medium can be writtenin the matrix form.whereis the symmetric conductivity tensor. Figure 1 showskijseveral types of boundary conditions frequently encountered in theanalysis. These boundary conditions are (1) specified surfacetemperatures, (2) surface heating, (3) surface convection, and( 4 ) surface radiation:T TsonSI(2.5a)(2.5b)(2.5c)qxnxwhereT, qyny qznz4 GETS- aqronis the specified surface temperature; nx,S4ny, nZdirection cosines of the outwardnormal to the surface, qs(2.5d)are theis thesurface heating rate unit area, h is the convection coefficient,T,is the convective medium temperature,constant,Eis the surface emissivity, a(Jis the Stefan-Boltzmannis the surface absorp-tivity, and .qr is the incident radiant heat flow rate per unitarea.

10To apply the finite element technique, the domain S2is firstdiscretized into a numberof elements. For an element with rnodes, the element temperature,Eq. (2.1),can be written in thefo m(2.7a)and the temperature gradients within each element are(2.7b)(2.7 )(2.7d)These element temperature gradients can be written in the matrixform,wherematrixis the temperature-gradient interpolation

11aN2ay. a NrayaN2az. aNrazand, therefore, the components of heat flow rate, Eq.( 2 . 4 ) , become(2.10)[k] denotes the thermal conductivity matrix.whereIn the derzvation of the element equations, the methodofweighted residuals is applied to the energy equation, Eq.(2.3),each individual element(e).forThis method requires(2.11)i 1,2.rAfter the integrations are performed on the first three terms byusing Gauss's Theorem, a surface integral of the heat flow acrossthe element boundary,becomer(e),is introduced, and the above equations

II , .I12(2.12)where*qis the vector of conduction heat flux across the elementboundary and?I is a unit vector normal to the boundary. Theboundary conditions as shown in Eqs. (2.5a -2.5d) are then imposed,(2.13)By substituting the vectorof heat flow rate, Eq. (2.10), the abovein the matrix form,element equations finally result(2.14)where[Clis the element capacitance matrix; [Kc],[ J. ]and[Kr] are element conductance matrices corresponding to conduction,convection and radiation, respectively. These matrices are expressedasfollows:

13(2.15a)(2.15b)(2.154(2.15d)The right-hand sideof the discretized equation (2.14) containsheat load vectors due to specified nodal temperatures, internal heatgeneration, specified surface heating, surface convection and surfaceradiation. These vectors are defined by(2.16a)(2.16b)(2.16 )(2.16d)(2.16e)whereaqis the vector of conduction heat flux across boundary thatis required to maintain the specified nodal temperatures.

142.4Finite Element Structural AnalysisIn a finite element structural analysis, element matrices maybe derived by the methodof weighted residuals, or by a variationalmethod such as the principle of minimum potential energy[17-191.For simplicityin establishing these element matrices and understand-ing general derivations, the last approach is presented herein.The basic idea of this approach is to derive the static equilibriumequations and then include dynamic effects through the use ofD'Alembert's principle.Consider an elastic body in a three-dimensional state of stress.The internal strain energy of an element(e)can be written in aform,,-(2.17)where is the element volume,components;[E]andLE,]{ a } denotes a vector of stressdenote row matrices of total strain andinitial strain components, respectively. Using the stress-strainrelations,(2.18)wherebecomes[Dlis the elasticity matrix, the internal strain energy

15or(2.19)For each element, the potential energy of the external forcesmay result from body forces and boundary surface tractions. Thepotential energy due to body forces can be written in a form,(2.20){ f 1 denotes a vector of body force components. Similarly,wherethe potential energy dueto surface tractions is,(2.21)wherer (e){g}denotes a vector of surface traction components, anddenotes the element boundary. The total element potentialenergy 9TeYthe sum of the internal strain energy and the potentialenergy of the external forcesis,(2.22)

16For a three-dimensional finite element with r nodes, thedisplacement field can be expressed asI r(61 where u, v, w[NS](2.23)are components of displacement in the three coordinatedirections. The vector of strain components can be computed fromEXEEYz7(2.24)yXYYY yXZJwhere[BS]is the strain-displacement interpolation matrix. Bysubstituting the element displacement vector,Eq. ( 2 . 2 3 ) , and thevector of strain components, Eq. ( 2 . 2 4 ) into Eq. ( 2 . 2 2 ) , the totalelement potential energy is expressed in termsof the nodal displacement vector0as

es,which yields the element equilibrium equations,(2.26)where[K,]is the element stiffness matrix defined by(2.27a)The right hand side of the equilibrium equations contains forcevectors due to concentrated forces, body forces, surface tractionsand initial strain, respectively. The nodal force vectors duetobody forces and surface tractions are(2.27b)(2.27 )

". . .18For initial strains from thermal effects, the corresponding nodal{FT)vectoris due to the change of temperature from a referenceastemperature of the zero-stress state and may be written(2.27d)where{ a ) is a vector of thermal expansion coefficients,T isthe element temperature distribution, and Tref is the referencetemperature for zero stress.For elastic bodies subjected to dynamic loads, the effectsofinertia and damping forces must be taken into account. UsingD'Alembert's principle, the inertia force can be treated as a bodyforce given byIf)wherep -(2.28a)p{i)is the mass per unit volume. By using element displacementvariations, Eq. (2.23), this inertia force is expressed in terms ofnodal displacements asCf) -.P[Ns](2.28b)Similarly, the damping force which is usually assumed to be proportional to the velocity can be expressed in the form,If)where!J -IJ[Ns] {XI(2.28 )is a damping coefficient. By substituting these inertiaEq. (2.27b), the equiand damping forces, Eqs. (2.28b- 2 . 2 8 ) into valent nodal body forces shown inEq. (2.27b) become

I-19(2.29)Finally, by using the static equilibrium equations, Eq.(2.26), withthe above equivalent nodal body force, the basic equations of structural dynamics canbe written in the form,where[MIandICs]are the element mass and damping matrices,respectively, and defined by(2.31a)(2.31b)In a general formulationof transient thermal-stress problem,the heat conduction equation (2.3) contains a mechanical couplingterm in addition [16].This coupling term represents the mechanicalenergy associated with deformation of the continuum and in somehighly specialized problems (see Ref.16) can affect the temperaturesolution.In most of engineering applications, fortunately, this termis insignificant and is usually disregarded in the heat conductionequation. This simplification permits transient thermal solutionsand dynamic structural responses to be computed independently.For a structural analysis where the inertia and damping effectsare negligible, the static structural response, Eq. (2.26), can be

20computed at selected times corresponding to the transient thermalsolutions. Such a sequence of computations, widely used in thermalstructural applications, is called a quasi-static analysis. Resultsof temperatures directly enter the structural analysis through thecomputation of the thermal nodal force vector, Eq. (2.27d). Temperatures also have an indirect effecton the analysis through the[Dlstructural material properties, since the elasticity matrixand the thermal expansion coefficient vector{ a ) are, in general,temperature dependent. Temperature dependent properties may resultin a variation of the structural element stiffness matrix,Eq. (2.27a),throughout the transient response.2.5Integrated ApproachThe representation of the element temperature distribution inthe computation of structural nodal forces is an important step inthe coupled thermal-structural finite element analysis. In typicalproduction-type finite element programs, element nodal temperaturesare the only information transferred from the thermal analysis tothe structural analysis. This general procedure is shown schematically in Fig. 2(a) and herein is called the conventional finiteelement approach. Since the conventional thermal analysis onlyprovides nodal temperatures, an approximate temperature distributionis assumed in the structural analysis which resultsa reductioninin accuracy of displacements and thermal stresses.To improve the capabilities and efficiencyof the finiteelement method, an approach called integrated thermal-structuralanalysis is developed as illustrated by Fig.2(b).The goals of

INTEGRATEDCONVENTIONALTHERMALCOULD BE11TA T ONLYPROCESSINGSTRUCTURALSTRUCTURAL00IMPROVED THERMAL ELEMENTSOF HEATINGTHERMAL AND STRUCTURALELEMENTS S IM EDNODALONONLY{TI0Conventional(a) analysisFig. 2 .{T)- FORMULATIONFUNCTIONCOMPATIBLETHERMALSTRUCTURALA S ACTUALTEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTIONS( b ) maland s t r u c t u r a la n a l y s i s - .

22the integrated approach are to: (1) provide thermal elements whichpredict detailed temperature variations accurately,(2) maintainthe same discretization for both thermal and structural models withfully compatible thermal and structural elements, and( 3 ) provideaccurate thermal loads to the structural analysis to improve theaccuracy of displacements and stresses.These goals of the integrated approach require developing newthermal finite elements that can provide higher accuracy and efficiency than conventional finite elements. The basic restrictiononthese new thermal elements is the required compatability with thestructural elements to preserve a common discretization. Detailedtemperature distributions resulting from the improved thermal finiteelements can provide accurate thermal loads required for thestructural analysisby rigorously evaluating the thermal loadintegral, Eq. (2.27d).

Chapter 3EXACT FINITE ELEMENTS FOR ONE-DIMENSIONALLINEAR THFXMAL-STRUCTLZAL PROBLEMSIn general, polynomials are selected as element interpolationfunctions to describe variations of the dependent variable withinelements.In one-dimensional analysis, the simplest polynomial whichthe first order,provides a linear variation within an elementof is0where c1 C2X0 denotes the dependent variable such as temperatureordisplacement;C1and C2 denote constants, andxis the coor-dinate of a point within the element.A finite element with twonodes is formulated by imposing the conditions at nodes,whereLis the element length;01 and0,are nodal values atnode 1 and 2, respectively. The dependent variable, therefore, canof nodal values asbe written in termsor in the rnatrix form,23

24whereLNJis the row matrix of element interpolation functions.is assumedThe type of finite element where the dependent variableto vary linearly between the two element nodes is often used in onedimensional problems and is called a conventional finite elementherein. With the linear approximation, a large number of elementsare required to represent a sharply varying dependent variable. Insome special cases, however, conventional finite elements can provideexact solutions when the solutions to problemsare in the form ofalinear variation. For example, a linear temperature variation is theexact solution of one-dimensional steady-state heat conductiona inslab; therefore, the use of the conventional finite element leads toan exact solution. Further observation [ Z O ] has shown that, undersome conditions, exact nodal values are obtained through theofusethis element type. Temperatures for steady-state heat conductionwith internal heat generationin a slab and deformationsof a barloaded by its own weight are examples of this case. In the past,the capability of conventional finite elements to provide exactsolutions has been regarded as a propertyof the.particular equationbeing solved and not applicable to general problems.

25In this chapter, finite elements that provide exact solutionsto one-dimensional linear steady-state thermal-structural problemsare given. The fundamental approach in developing exact finiteelements is basedon the use of exact solutions to one-dimensionalproblems governed by linear ordinary differential equations. Ageneral formulationof the exact finite element is first derived andapplications are madeto various thermal-structural problems.Benefits of utilizing the exact finite elements are demonstratedby comparison with results from conventional finite elements andexact solutions.Exact Element Formulation3.1In this section, a general derivationof exact finite elementsis given. Exact finite elements for various thermal and structuralproblems are derived and described in detail in the subsequentsections. Consider an ordinary, linear, nonhomogeneous differentialequation,anwherex- dxnan-1dn-l@ dX(3.4)n-1is the independent variable,variable , ai,i O,nare@(x)is the dependentconstant coefficients, andr(x)isthe forcing function. A general solution to the above differentialequation has the formn

26whereCiare arbitrary constants,the homogeneous solution andg(x)fi(x)are typical functions inis a particular solution. Forexample, a typical one-dimensional steady-state thermal analysis isof the form ofgoverned by second order differential equationEq. ( 3 . 4 ) and has a general solutionBy comparing this general solution with the solution in the form ofpolynomials used to describe a linear variation of dependent variablein the conventional finite element,Eq. (3.1), basic differencesbetween these two solutions are noted:(1) the functionfi(x)inthe general solution to a given differential equation can be formsother than the polynomials, and(2) the general solution contains aparticular solutiong(x)forcing function r(x)equation ( 3 . 4 )3.1.1which is known in general and depends onon the right hand side of the differential.Exact Element Interpolation Functions and NodelessParameters" Once a general solution to a given differential is obtained,exact element interpolation functions can be derived.For a typicalfinite element with n degreesof freedom, n boundary conditions(3.5),are required. With the general solution shown in equationthe required boundary conditions are (Xi) iwhere x is the nodal coordinate andii l,2'i,., n(3.7)is the element nodal

27unknown at node i. After applying the boundary conditions, theexact element variation ofwhereNi(x)to node i. (x)has the form,is the element interpolation function correspondingThe functionG(x) isa known function associated withthe particular solution. In genera1;this function can be expressedas a product of a spatial function No(x) anda scalar term 9,which contains aphysical forcing parameter such as body force,surfaceheating,etc. ;and , therefore, the exact element@(x)variation becomes,n(3.8a)o r in the matrixform(3.8b)Note that the element interpolation functionNi(xi)has a valueof unity at node i to satisfy the boundary conditions,Eq. (3.71,thus the spatial function N 0 (x) must vanish at nodes. Since theI

28term o is a known quantity and neither relates to the elementnodal coordinates nor is identified with the element nodes, it iscalled a nodeless parameter. Likewise, the corresponding spatialfunctionis called a nodeless interpolation atypicalnodelesspara-meter finite element, Eq. (3.8), and the conventional linear finiteelement, E q . (3.3), is shown in Fig. 3 .3.1.2 Exact Element MatricesAfter exact element interpolation functions are obtained, thecorresponding element matrices can be formulated. For the governingordinary differential equation, Eq.( 3 . 4 1 , typical element matricescan be derived (see section 2.2).and element equations can be writtein the form,II""4IK1OK20''IIIKO2""""K1lK12K2nK21K22where Kij, i, j O,matrix; Fi, i O,. KOn1I(3.9)n are typical terms in the element stiffnessn are typical terms in the element load vector,9i, i 1, n are the element nodal unknowns, and o is the elementnodeless parameter. Since the element nodeless parameter is known,the above element equations reduce to

29CONVENTIONALNODELESS PARAMETERFig. 3.IComparison of conventional and nodeless p a r m e t e relements.

30.rKF1F2Fn3.210K20" o\\I4'(3.10)Knodi4Exact Finite Elements in Thermal ProblemsIn one-dimensional linear steady-state thermal problems, typicalgoverning differential equations can be derived afromheat balanceon a small segment in the form,(3.11)where T denotes the temperature, x denotes a typical onedimensional space coordinatein Cartesian, cylindrical or sphericalcoordinates; ai'i O , 1,2are variable coefficients, andr(x)is a function associated with a heat load for a given problem.Ageneral solution to the above differential equation has the form,wherefl(x) andf (x)2homogeneous equation,and g(x)g(x) isC1are linearly independent solutionsandC2of theare constants of integration,is a particular solution. Since the particular solutionknown, the above general solution has two unknownsto bedetermined.A finite element with two nodes, therefore, can beformulated using the conditions,

31wherexi' i l , 2Ti, i 1 , 2are nodal coordinates andare thenodal temperatures. Imposing these conditiohs on the general solution yields two equations for evaluatingT(x2)orinAftermatrixC1 T2 C1f (x )12 C2C1andC2, g(x2)f (x )22formandC2are determined and substituted into the generalsolution, Eq. (3.12), the exact element temperature variation canbewrittenasor in the matrix form,(3.14b)whereNO(x)is the nodeless interpolation function and To is the

. .- .”.32nodeless parameter;N1(x)andN2(x)are element interpolationfunctions corresponding to node 1 and 2 , respectively. These elementinterpolation functions including the nodeless parameter knownarefunctions defined by(3.15a)IW(3.15b)(3.15 )whereW fl(xl) f2(x2)-.fl(x2) f2(x1)Using the exact element interpolation functions shown inEq. (3.14), and the governing differential equation, Eq. (3.11),element matrices can be derived through the use of the method ofweighted residuals;XP2dTddT[zz) al dx aoT - r ](a2XN. dx1 0i O,1,2 (3.16)1Performing an integration by partson the first term and substitutingfor element temperature int e n s of the interpolation functions,Eq. (3.14), yi

element thermal-structural analysis. First, basic concepts of the integrated finite element thermal-structural formulation are intro- duced in Chapter 2. Finite elements which provide exact solutions to one-dimensional linear steady-state thermal-

Related Documents:

Finite element analysis DNV GL AS 1.7 Finite element types All calculation methods described in this class guideline are based on linear finite element analysis of three dimensional structural models. The general types of finite elements to be used in the finite element analysis are given in Table 2. Table 2 Types of finite element Type of .

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

1 Overview of Finite Element Method 3 1.1 Basic Concept 3 1.2 Historical Background 3 1.3 General Applicability of the Method 7 1.4 Engineering Applications of the Finite Element Method 10 1.5 General Description of the Finite Element Method 10 1.6 Comparison of Finite Element Method with Other Methods of Analysis

Finite Element Method Partial Differential Equations arise in the mathematical modelling of many engineering problems Analytical solution or exact solution is very complicated Alternative: Numerical Solution – Finite element method, finite difference method, finite volume method, boundary element method, discrete element method, etc. 9

3.2 Finite Element Equations 23 3.3 Stiffness Matrix of a Triangular Element 26 3.4 Assembly of the Global Equation System 27 3.5 Example of the Global Matrix Assembly 29 Problems 30 4 Finite Element Program 33 4.1 Object-oriented Approach to Finite Element Programming 33 4.2 Requirements for the Finite Element Application 34 4.2.1 Overall .

2.7 The solution of the finite element equation 35 2.8 Time for solution 37 2.9 The finite element software systems 37 2.9.1 Selection of the finite element softwaresystem 38 2.9.2 Training 38 2.9.3 LUSAS finite element system 39 CHAPTER 3: THEORETICAL PREDICTION OF THE DESIGN ANALYSIS OF THE HYDRAULIC PRESS MACHINE 3.1 Introduction 52

Figure 3.5. Baseline finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-8 Figure 3.6. Baseline finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.7. Baseline finite element mesh for F-15 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.8. Uniform bias finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-14 Figure 3.9. Uniform bias finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-15 Figure 3.10.

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan