IATF 16949:2016 Vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 Matrix
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reservedCopyright 2018 Advisera Expert Solutions Ltd. All rights reserved.1
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009IntroductionIntroductionExplanation0.1 GeneralThese clauses are almost the same; the new version explains thecontext of the organization and its influence on the structure of theQuality Management System (QMS), while pointing out that thestandard does not imply a need for uniformity in the structure of theQMS. Additionally, enhancing customer satisfaction is pointed out inthis clause.Not includedThe 2009 revision of the standard only mentions that the qualitymanagement principles are taken into consideration; the 2016revision lists the quality management principles, pointing out thatdetailed descriptions of the principles are given in ISO 9000.0.3 Process Approach0.2 Process approachThe clause name is the same, but the 2016 revision has three sectionsthat explain the process approach, PDCA cycle, and risk-basedthinking. For more information, read How to implement the PDCAcycle in the automotive industry according to IATF 16949.0.4 Relationship with OtherManagement System Standards0.4 Compatibility with othermanagement systemsThis clause of the new version of the standard refers to ISO 9000, ISO9004, and Annex B of the standard, which provide more details aboutother standards on quality management.1 ScopeThis clause is almost the same for both versions of the standard.Not includedThis clause provides clarification on the applicability of IATF16949:2016 to various processes and sites of the organization wheremanufacturing of automotive parts occurs.2 Normative referencesThese clauses are almost the same for both versions of the standard.0.1 General0.2 Quality Management PrinciplesQuality Management SystemRequirements1 Scope1.1. Scope - automotivesupplemental to ISO9001:20152 Normative references2.1 Normative and informativereferencesCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved2
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation3 Terms and definitions3 Terms and definitionsThe new version refers to ISO 9000:2015.3.1 Terms and definitions for theautomotive industryNot includedThe new version provides definitions for automotive industry-specificterms.Not includedThis is a completely new requirement; the organization will need todetermine the external and internal contexts that affect theorganization.For more information, see: How to define the context of theorganization in IATF 16949:2016.See sample document here: Procedure for Determining Context ofthe Organization and Interested Parties.4.2 Understanding the needs andexpectations of interested partiesNot includedInterested parties are introduced in the new version of the standard.The previous version was only focused on the customer.For more information, see: Determining interested parties and theirrequirements according to IATF 16949:2016.4.3 Determining the scope of thequality management system4.2.2 Quality manualThis requirement was related to the Quality Manual in the previousversion. Now, there is only a requirement to document the scope.1.1 General1.2 ApplicationThese requirements were originally included in ISO/TS 16949:2009Sections 1.1 and 1.2. The first requirement was slightly revised to notonly address the need to include supporting functions in the audit,but also to ensure that the supporting functions are also included inthe scope of the QMS.For more information, see: How to define scope of the QMSaccording to IATF 16949:2016.4 Context of the organization4.1 Understanding theorganization and its context4.3.1 Determining the scope of thequality management system supplementalCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved3
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation4.3.2 Customer specificrequirementsAll clauses of the standardAlthough the need to fulfill and satisfy customer-specificrequirements was already mentioned throughout the whole ISO/TS16949 document, this requirement specifically addresses the need toevaluate the customer-specific requirements and include them whereapplicable in the organization's Quality Management System.4.4 Quality management systemand its processes4.1 General requirements4.4.1 (clause does not have a title)Not included4.4.1.1 Conformance of productsand processesAll clauses of the standardThis requirement was adopted based on survey feedback. It ensurestwo things: that the organization is responsible for the conformity ofoutsourced processes, and that all products and processes meet therequirements and expectations of all interested parties.6.4.1 Personnel safety to achieveconformity to productrequirementsThis is a new section with new and enhanced requirements thataddress current and emerging issues that the automotive industry isfacing related to product and process safety. The list of items a)through n) requires that the organization addresses them in adocumented and dedicated process for the management of productsafety-related products and manufacturing processes.For more information, see: Ensuring product safety according to IATF16949.See the sample document here: Product Safety Procedure.4.4.1.2 Product Safety4.4.2 (clause does not have a title)The requirements from the previous version remain; the newrequirements are related to determining the risks and opportunities,inputs and outputs of the processes, as well as assigningresponsibilities and authorities for the processes.Copyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved4
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation5 Leadership5.1 Management commitment5.1 Leadership and commitment5.4.2 Quality management systemplanning5.1 Management commitmentThe clauses are very similar; the emphasis in the new version is onpromoting awareness and support of other persons who contributeto the effectiveness of the QMS. The main difference between theclauses is that the new version requires the top management to takeaccountability for the effectiveness of the QMS.5.1.1 General5.4.2 Quality management systemplanning5.1.1.1 Corporate responsibilityNot includedCorporate responsibility was not included in ISO/TS 16949.5.1.1 Process efficiencyThe requirement to review the processes to ensure effectiveness andefficiency was covered in ISO/TS 16949, Section 5.1.1. Based on theIATF survey feedback, the IATF strengthened the requirement toensure that the results of the review are now to be included in themanagement review.Not includedISO/TS 16949:2009 addressed management responsibility andauthority, but it did not explicitly mention that management mustensure that process owners understand their roles and arecompetent. The IATF adopted this requirement to ensure thatmanagement understands this expectation.5.1.2 Customer Focus5.2 Customer focusThe old requirements remain the same. Determination of the risksand opportunities regarding conformity of products and services is anew requirement, as well as the consideration of the statutory andregulatory requirements.5.2 Policy5.3 Quality PolicyThe requirements remain the same. An additional requirement is tobe available to interested parties, as appropriate.5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness andefficiency5.1.1.3 Process ownersCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved5
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009ExplanationSee the sample document here: Quality Policy.For more information, see: How to Write a Quality Policy Compliantwith IATF 16949.5.2.1 Establishing the quality policy5.2.2 Communicating the qualitypolicy5.3 Organizational roles,responsibilities, and authorities5.3.1 Organizational roles,responsibilities, and authorities supplemental5.3.2 Responsibility and authorityfor product requirements andcorrective actions5.5.1 Responsibility and authorityThe main difference is that the new standard does not requireappointing a management representative; however, the new clausedescribes in more detail the roles, responsibilities, and authoritieswithin the QMS, implying that they can be allocated to differentpersons.5.5.2.1 Customer representativeThis requirement was already part of ISO/TS 16949:2009. However,the IATF adopted some modifications to the requirement to addressthe need to document assigned personnel responsibilities andauthorities. Additionally, it clarifies that the goal is not just to addresscustomer requirements, but also to meet customer requirementsfully.5.5.1.1 Responsibility for qualityThe IATF adopted some enhancements to the requirement originallyincluded in ISO/TS 16949 to address the need to explicitly make topmanagement responsible for ensuring conformity to productrequirements and for corrective actions taken.6 Planning6.1 Actions to address risks andopportunitiesNot included6.1.1 (clause does not have a title)Not included6.1.2 (clause does not have a title)Not includedCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reservedThis is a completely new requirement. When planning the QMS, theorganization will need to determine the risks and opportunitiesaffecting the organization. Here you can download a free preview ofthe Procedure for Addressing Risks and Opportunities.6
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:20166.1.2.1 Risk analysis6.1.2.2 Preventive action6.1.2.3 Contingency plans6.2 Quality objectives and planningto achieve them6.2.1 (clause does not have a title)ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation7.2.2.2 Organizationmanufacturing feasibilityThe need to identify, analyze, and consider actual and potential riskswas already covered in various areas of ISO/TS 16949. The IATFadopted the additional requirements for risk analysis, recognizing thecontinual need to analyze and respond to risk and to haveorganizations consider specific risks associated with the automotiveindustry.For more information, see: What is FMEA, and how to apply it in IATF16949.Here you can download free preview of the Procedure for FMEA RiskAssessment.8.5.3 Preventive actionThe IATF enhanced the requirement found in ISO/TS 16949 byproviding more detail regarding what is considered to be bestpractice in the automotive industry.Here you can download a free preview of the Preventive ActionRecord.6.3.2 Contingency plansThe IATF enhanced the requirement found in ISO/TS 16949 byproviding more detail regarding what is considered to be bestpractice in the automotive industry. The expanded requirementensures that the organization defines and prepares contingencyplans, along with a notification process to the customer or otherinterested parties.Here you can download free preview of a Contingency Plan.5.4.1 Quality objectivesThe requirements remain the same, but are further elaborated in thenew version.Here you can download a free preview of the Quality Objectives.6.2.2 (clause does not have a title)Copyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved7
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation5.4.1.1 Quality objectives —SupplementalISO/TS 16949 included the importance of addressing customerexpectations in the NOTE to Section 5.4.1.1. The IATF decided toenhance the requirement by including the NOTE in Section 6.2.2.1and to require that it be done at all levels throughout theorganization.For more information, see: How to Write IATF 16949 QualityObjectives.5.4.2 Quality management systemplanningThe new version of the standard defines how the changes in the QMSshould be managed by considering the purpose of the change, thepotential consequences, availability of resources, and allocation ofresponsibilities.6.1 Provision of resourcesThe old requirements remain, but the new version emphasizesconsideration of capabilities and constraints of the organization, aswell as resources obtained from external providers.7.1.2 People6.2.1 GeneralThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.7.1.3 Infrastructure6.3 InfrastructureThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.7.1.3.1 Plant, facility, andequipment planning6.3.1 Plant, facility and equipmentplanningThe new version puts increased focus on risk identification and riskmitigation, evaluating manufacturing feasibility, re-evaluation ofchanges in processes, and inclusion of on-site supplier activities.7.1.4 Environment for theoperation of processes6.4 Working environmentThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.7.1.4.1 Environment for theoperation ofprocesses - supplemental6.4.2 Cleanliness of premisesThe requirement was maintained from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949,only moved to Section 7.1.4.1.6.2.2.1 Quality objectives andplanning to achievethem - supplemental6.3 Planning of Changes7 Support7.1 Resources7.1.1 GeneralCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved8
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:20097.1.5 Monitoring and measuringresources7.6 Control of monitoring andmeasuring equipment7.1.5.1 GeneralExplanationThe new version of the standard emphasizes the provision ofresources for monitoring and measurement. The organization mustretain the documented information as evidence of fitness for purposeof monitoring and measurement resources. The old standard onlyfocuses on the measuring equipment.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure forEquipment Maintenance and Measurement Equipment.7.6.1 Measurement systemanalysisRecords are now required for customer acceptance of alternativemethods. See Annex B, which contains IATF-recommended tools forimplementation.For more information, see: How to Establish Measurement SystemAnalysis According to IATF 16949.7.1.5.2.1 Calibration/verificationrecords7.6.2 Calibration/verificationrecordsEnsuring that customer requirements are met, and enhancedcalibration / verification record retention requirements, includingsoftware installed on employee-owned or customer-ownedequipment.Here you can download a free preview of the Maintenance andCalibration Record.7.1.5.3 Laboratory requirements7.6.3 Laboratory requirementsThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.7.6.3.1 Internal laboratoryAdded a requirement to have the organization (client) define amethodology to verify measurement system capability if no nationalor international standard(s) exist.Here you can download a free preview of the LaboratoryManagement Procedure.7.1.5.1.1 Measurement systemanalysis7.1.5.2 Measurement traceability7.1.5.3.1 Internal laboratoryCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved9
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation7.6.3.2 External laboratoryAllows the organization to conduct second-party assessments oflaboratory facilities; however, requires customer approval ofassessment method. Added government regulatory confirmation, ifrequired.Here you can download a free preview of the External LaboratoryAcceptance Checklist.7.1.6 Organizational knowledgeNot includedThis is a completely new requirement, which acknowledges theorganizational knowledge as an important resource. The organizationwill need to determine the knowledge necessary to run its processesand achieve conformity of products and services.7.2 Competence6.2.2 Competence, training andawarenessCompetence and awareness are split into different clauses toemphasize their importance and provide more detailed requirements.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure forCompetence, Training and Awareness.7.2.1 Competence - supplementalNot includedThe new version of the standard strengthens requirements foridentification of training needs and achieving competence.Here you can download a free preview of the Training Record.7.2.2 Competence - on the jobtraining6.2.2.3 Training on the jobEnhanced emphasis of on-the-job training and its importance inmeeting customer requirements, including other interested parties.8.2.2.5 Internal auditorqualificationEnhanced requirements for the organization's internal auditorcompetency requirements to ensure a more robust internal auditprocess.For more information, see: Requirements for competence of IATF16949 internal auditors.7.1.5.3.2 External laboratory7.2.3 Internal auditor competencyCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved10
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:20167.2.4 Second-party auditorcompetency7.3 AwarenessISO/TS 16949:2009ExplanationNot includedNew requirements are included for second-party auditors to meet inorder to be properly qualified to conduct those types of audits, withcustomer-specific requirements being a main focus.Here you can download a free preview of the List of Qualified InternalAuditors.6.2.2 Competence, training andawarenessCompetence and awareness are split into different clauses toemphasize their importance and provide more detailed requirements.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure forCompetence, Training and Awareness.7.3.1 Awareness - supplemental6.2.2.4 Employee motivation andempowermentAdditional requirements are included in the new version of thestandard to ensure all employees are aware of their impact on theorganization’s (client’s) product quality output, customer-specificrequirements, and risks involved for the customer with nonconforming product.Here you can download a free preview of the Awareness TrainingReport.7.3.2 Employee motivation andempowermentNot a major change, but the new standard includes requiredmaintenance of a "documented process" for employee motivationand empowerment.7.4 CommunicationThe new clause includes both external and internal communicationand requires definition of responsibility and methods ofcommunication.7.5 Documented information5.5.3 Internal communication4.2.3 Control of documents4.2.4 Control of records4.2.3 Control of documents7.5.1 General4.2.4 Control of recordsCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reservedDocuments and records now belong to the samecategory - documented information. The requirements of bothversions are equivalent.For more information, see: A new approach to document and recordcontrol in IATF 16949.11
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:20097.5.1.1 Quality ManagementSystem Documentation4.2.3 Control of documents7.5.2 Creating and updatingExplanation4.2.4 Control of records4.2.3 Control of documents4.2.4 Control of records7.5.3 Control of documentedinformation4.2.3 Control of documents7.5.3.1 (clause does not have atitle)4.2.3 Control of documents7.5.3.2 (clause does not have atitle)4.2.3 Control of documents7.5.3.2.1 Record retention4.2.4.1 Records retentionRequires a record retention process that is defined and documentedand that includes the organization’s record retention requirements.4.2.3.1 Engineering specificationsAdded a requirement that the process is documented and agreedwith the customer. Also, clarified product design changes and productrealization process changes.8.1 Operational planning andcontrol7.1 Planning product realizationThe requirements of both clauses are equivalent.8.1.1 Operational planning andcontrol - supplemental7.1.1 Planning of productrealization — SupplementalEnhanced detail to ensure key processes are included and consideredwhen planning for product realization.8.1.2 Confidentiality7.1.3 ConfidentialityMinor editing, no major change in the intent of this section.7.2 Customer-related processes;7.2.3 Customer communicationThe requirements are almost the same, but the new versionemphasizes communication about treatment of customer property.Here you can download a free preview of the Sales Procedure.7.2.3.1 Customer communication— SupplementalAdded a requirement for a communication method (written or verbal)to be agreed with the customer.7.5.3.2.2 Engineering specification4.2.4 Control of records4.2.4 Control of records4.2.4 Control of records8 Operation8.2 Requirements for products andservices8.2.1 Customer communication8.2.1.1 Customercommunication - supplementalCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved12
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation8.2.2 Determining therequirements for products andservices7.2.1 Determination ofrequirements related to theproductThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.2.2.1 Determining therequirements for products andservices - supplemental7.2.1 Determination ofrequirements related to theproduct (NOTES 2 and 3)Strengthened the standard by elevating NOTES into requirements.7.2.2 Review of requirementsrelated to the productThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.Here you can download a free preview of the Customer RequirementReview Checklist.8.2.3.1.1 Review of therequirements for products andservices - supplemental7.2.2.1 Review of requirementsrelated to the product —SupplementalStrengthens the requirement, stating that the organization is requiredto retain a documented customer authorization waiver.8.2.3.1.2 Customer designatedspecial characteristics7.2.1.1 Customer-designatedspecial characteristicsMinor editing, no major change in the intent of this section.7.2.2.2 Organizationmanufacturing feasibilityThe new version of the standard includes enhanced requirements formanufacturing feasibility analysis.Here you can download a free preview of the Feasibility Study Report.Not includedThis new clause defines changes to requirements related to productsand services.8.3 Design and development ofproducts and services7.3 Design and developmentThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure for Designand Development.8.3.1 GeneralNot includedThis clause defines when the design and development process isnecessary.8.2.3 Review of the requirementsfor products and services8.2.3.1 (clause does not have atitle)8.2.3.1.3 Organizationmanufacturing feasibility8.2.3.2 (clause does not have atitle)8.2.4 Changes to requirements forproducts and servicesCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved13
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation8.3.1.1 Design and development ofproducts andservices - supplemental7.3 Design and development(NOTE)Strengthened the standard by elevating the NOTE to a requirement,added a requirement for documentation of the design anddevelopment process.8.3.2 Design and developmentplanning7.3.1 Design and developmentplanningThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.Here you can download a free preview of the Project Plan andReview.8.3.2.1 Design and developmentplanning - supplemental7.3.1.1 Multidisciplinary approachClarification of when the multi-disciplinary approach is to be used andwho should be involved.8.3.2.2 Product design skills6.2.2.1 Product design skillsNOTE added as an example of a product design skillset.8.3.2.3 Development of productswith embedded softwareNot includedAdded requirements for organization-responsible embeddedsoftware development and software development capability selfassessments.8.3.3 Design and developmentinputs7.3.2 Design and developmentinputsThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.3.3.1 Product design input7.3.2.1 Product design inputExpanded the minimum set of product design input requirements,emphasizing regulatory and software requirements.8.3.3.2 Manufacturing processdesign input7.3.2.2 Manufacturing processdesign inputExpanded the list of manufacturing process design inputs; furtherstrengthened the requirement by putting the NOTE into arequirement.8.3.3.3 Special characteristics7.3.2.3 Special characteristicsIdentify source of special characteristics; include risk analysis to beperformed by the customer or the organization.8.3.4 Design and developmentcontrols7.3.4 Design and developmentreview;7.3.5 Design and developmentverification;7.3.6 Design and developmentvalidation;Copyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reservedThe new clause sublimates the requirements of the three old clauses,keeping the old requirements and emphasizing the consideration ofnature, duration, and complexity of design and developmentactivities.14
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation8.3.4.1 Monitoring7.3.4.1 MonitoringAligned the IATF 16949 standard with IATF OEM advanced qualityactivities; reduced the customer-specific requirements and furtherclarified the NOTE.8.3.4.2 Design and developmentvalidation7.3.6.1 Design and developmentvalidation — SupplementalStrengthening of requirements for design and developmentvalidation; also, added embedded software.7.3.6.2 Prototype programStrengthened the standard by focusing the organization on theQuality Management System for managing outsourced products andservices.8.3.4.4 Product approval process7.3.6.3 Product approval processClarified approval requirements with emphasis on outsourcedproducts and/or services and record retention required.Here you can download a free preview of the Production PartApproval Process Procedure.8.3.5 Design and developmentoutputs7.3.3 Design and developmentoutputsThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.3.5.1 Design and developmentoutputs - supplemental7.3.3.1 Product design outputs —SupplementalRecognition of the use of 3D models; inclusion of service parts andpackaging.8.3.5.2 Manufacturing processdesign output7.3.3.2 Manufacturing processdesign outputStrengthened verification requirements, process input variables,capacity analysis, maintenance plans, and correction of processnonconformities.8.3.6 Design and developmentchanges7.3.7 Control of design anddevelopment changesThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.3.6.1 Design and developmentchanges - supplemental7.3.7 Control of design anddevelopment changes (NOTE)Strengthened requirement for change validation and approval priorto implementation and added embedded software.7.4.1 Purchasing processAlthough the name of the clause has changed, the requirements arepretty much the same.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure forPurchasing and Evaluation of Suppliers.8.3.4.3 Prototype program8.4 Control of externally providedprocesses, products and services8.4.1 GeneralCopyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved15
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation8.4.1.1 General - supplemental7.4.1 Purchasing process (NOTE 1)Strengthened the IATF 16949 standard by elevating the NOTE to arequirement.8.4.1.2 Supplier selection processNot includedStrengthened the standard by specifically calling out supplierselection process criteria.Here you can download a free preview of the Checklist for Evaluationof Suppliers.8.4.1.3 Customer-directed sources(also known as “Direct-Buy”)7.4.1.3 Customer-approvedsourcesClarification of organization’s responsibilities for customer-directedsources, even for Direct-Buy.8.4.2 Type and extent of control7.4.3 Verification of purchasedproductThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.4.2.1 Type and extent ofcontrol - supplemental7.4.3.1 Incoming productconformity to requirementsFurther strengthened the requirement for control of outsourcedprocesses, including the assessment of risk.8.4.2.2 Statutory and regulatoryrequirements7.4.1.1 Statutory and regulatoryconformityFurther strengthened requirements; clarified applicability of statutoryand regulatory requirements.8.4.2.3 Supplier qualitymanagement system development7.4.1.2 Supplier qualitymanagement system developmentProvides a method to strengthen ISO 9001 certification; alignment ofcustomer-specific requirements; clarification of acceptable third-partycertification bodies (recognized by the IATF).8.4.2.3.1 Automotive productrelated software or automotiveproducts with embedded softwareNot includedAdded requirements for software development assessmentmethodology.8.4.2.4 Supplier monitoring7.4.3.2 Supplier monitoringStrengthened requirements for supplier monitoring.8.4.2.4.1 Second-party auditsNot includedAlignment of customer-specific requirements into the IATF 16949standard.Here you can download a free preview of the Second Party AuditChecklist.8.4.2.5 Supplier development7.4.3.1 Incoming productconformity to requirementsEmphasis on performance-based supplier development actions.Copyright 2018 16949Academy. All rights reserved16
IATF 16949:2016 vs. ISO/TS 16949:2009 MatrixIATF 16949:2016ISO/TS 16949:2009Explanation8.4.3 Information for externalproviders7.4.2 Purchasing informationThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same. The newversion emphasizes the monitoring and control of external providers’performance.8.4.3.1 Information for externalproviders - supplementalNot includedRequires the organization to provide key information to their supplychain.8.5 Production and serviceprovision7.5 Production and serviceprovisionThe requirements of both clauses are pretty much the same.8.5.1 Control of production andservice provision7.5.1 Control of production andservice provision;7.5.2 Validation of processes forproduction and service provisionThe requirements are almost the same, but the new standard pointsout that the implemented controlled conditions are for delivery andpost-delivery activities.Here you can download a free preview of the Procedure forProduction and Service Provision.7.5.1.1 Control planStrengthened control plan requirements and aligned with IATF OEMcustomer-specific requirements into the IATF 16949 standard.Elevated NOTE to a requirement; strengthened control plan reviewand updated criteria, and linked to PFMEA update in the new versionof the standard.Here you can download a free preview of the Control Plan.8.5.1.2 Standardizedwork - operator instructions andvisual standards7.5.1.2 Work instructionsStrengthened requirements for standardized work, including therequi
IATF 16949:2016 ISO/TS 16949:2009 Explanation 3 Terms and definitions 3 Terms and definitions The new version refers to
Clause Map – IATF 16949:2016 to ISO/TS 16949:2009 Clause Map – V1.2 Whittington & Associates, LLC Page 3 of 5 IATF 16949:2016 Clauses ISO/TS 16949:2009 Clauses 8.2 Requirements for Products
Management Systems (QMS) IATF 16949:2016, which has replaced ISO/TS 16949:2009. IATF 16949:2016 is to be implemented as a supplement to, and in conjunction with ISO 9001:2015 rather than being a standalone QMS standard. It specifies the requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving a
www.iatfglobaloversight.org Page 1 of 20 IATF - International Automotive Task Force Rules for achieving and maintaining IATF Recognition IATF Rules 5th Edition – Sanctioned Interpretations The Rules for achieving and maintaining IATF Recognition 5th Edition for IATF 16949 (“Rules 5th Edition”) was pu
IATF - International Automotive Task Force IATF 16949:2016 – Sanctioned Interpretations IATF 16949 1st Edition was published in October 2016 and was effective 1 January 2017. The following Sanctioned Interpretations were determined and approved by the IATF. Unless otherwise indicated, Sanctioned Interpretations are applicable upon publication.
Comparing IATF 16949:2016 with ISO/TS 16949:2009 The new standard is based on Annex SL - the new high level structure. This is a common framework for all ISO management systems. This helps to keep consistency, align different management system standards, offer matching sub-clauses against the top level structure and apply common
The third edition of the automotive quality standard, ISO/TS 16949:2009, has been published to include the text of ISO 9001:2008. ISO/TS 16949:2009 replaces ISO/TS 16949:2002 and can be ordered at this AIAG web page. ISO/TS 16949:2009 can be ordered in hard copy or electronic format at an AIAG member price of 30 or a non-member price of 90.
IATF 16949:2016, ISO 9001:2015 or ISO14001, list projected certification date IATF 16949:2016 ISO/TS 16949 ISO 9001:2015 ISO 14001 Other Return completed form to: TF-METAL U.S.A., LLC . 70 Precision Drive . Walton, KY 41094 . Attention: Purchasing Department
Final 2012 policy CMS will implement the third year of the 4-year transition to new practice expense RVUs developed using the PPIS data. Available in the appendix of this summary, Table 84 of the .
