4. Lugeon Test Data

2y ago
179 Views
4 Downloads
3.05 MB
94 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Rosemary Rios
Transcription

4.Lugeon Test DataAppendix C - 62

Appendix C - 63

Appendix C - 64

Appendix C - 65

Appendix C - 66

Appendix C - 67

Appendix C - 68

Appendix C - 69

Appendix C - 70

Appendix C - 71

Appendix C - 72

Appendix C - 73

Appendix C - 74

Appendix C - 75

Appendix C - 76

Appendix C - 77

Appendix C - 78

Appendix C - 79

Appendix C - 80

Appendix C - 81

Appendix C - 82

Appendix C - 83

Appendix C - 84

Appendix C - 85

Appendix C - 86

Appendix C - 87

Appendix C - 88

Appendix C - 89

Appendix C - 90

Appendix C - 91

Appendix C - 92

Appendix C - 93

Appendix C - 94

Appendix C - 95

Appendix C - 96

Appendix C - 97

Appendix C - 98

Appendix C - 99

Appendix C - 100

Appendix C - 101

Appendix C - 102

Appendix C - 103

Appendix C - 104

Appendix C - 105

Appendix C - 106

Appendix C - 107

5.Water Level Monitoring DataAppendix C - 108

Appendix C - 109

Appendix C - 110

6.Field PhotographsAppendix C - 111

Appendix C - 112

Appendix C - 113

Appendix C - 114

Appendix C - 115

Appendix C - 116

Appendix C - 117

Appendix C - 118

Appendix C - 119

Appendix C - 120

Appendix C - 121

Appendix C - 122

7.Laboratory Test ResultsAppendix C - 123

Appendix C - 124

Appendix C - 125

Appendix C - 126

Appendix C - 127

Appendix C - 128

Appendix DStrategic Environmental Assessment Report

TABLE OF CONTENTSSTRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT . 11INTRODUCTION . 11.1 OBJECTIVES . 11.2 METHOD . 11.3 SCHEDULE . 12REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS . 22.1 SEA FOR 1ST AND 2ND STAGES . 22.2 EIA FOR SITE SURVEY . 23EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONDITIONS . 33.1 UGANDA . 33.1.1 Physical Environment. 33.1.2 Natural Environment . 43.1.3 Social Environment . 63.2 AYAGO PROJECT AREA . 243.2.1 Physical Environment. 243.2.2 Natural Environment . 253.2.3 Social environment. 363.3 EXAMINED ALTERNATIVES . 543.3.1 Stage 1 . 543.3.2 Stage 2 . 543.3.3 Stage 3 . 634PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE. 694.1 1ST STAKEHOLDER MEETING . 694.2 2ND STAKEHOLDER MEETING. 694.3 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE. 715IMPACT ASSESSMENT . 725.1 STAGE 1 . 725.1.1 Technical and Economic aspects . 725.1.2 Environmental aspect . 825.1.3 Social aspect . 875.1.4 General Evaluation . 915.2 STAGE 2 . 955.2.1 Economic and technical aspects . 965.2.2 Environmental aspect . 985.2.3 Social aspect . 1045.2.4 General Evaluation . 1115.3 STAGE 3 . 1195.3.1 Technical and Economic aspects . 1195.3.2 Environmental aspect . 1235.3.3 Social aspect . 135Appendix D-i

5.3.4General Evaluation . 1376MITIGATION MEASURES. 1396.1 ON SITE MITIGATION . 1396.2 OFF SITE MITIGATION . 1407SUGGESTION . 1407.1 SURVEY DURING EIA AND AFTER . 1407.1.1 Mammals. 1407.1.2 Birds . 1417.1.3 Reptiles. 1417.2 SCOPING FOR EIA. 1417.3 PERMISSION . 143Appendix D-ii

AbbreviationsCRCritically Endangered (IUCN Red List)CPICommunity Protected Areas InstitutionsEIAEnvironmental Impact AssessmentENEndangered (IUCN Red List)EXExtinct (IUCN Red List)IDPInternally Displaced PersonsIUCNthe International Union for Conservation of NatureJICAJapan International Cooperation AgencyLCLeast Concern (IUCN Red List)LRALord Resistance ArmyMFNPMurchison Falls National ParkMFPAMurchison Falls Protected AreaNEMAThe National Environment Management AuthorityNTNear ThreatenedSEAStrategic Environmental AssessmentUBOSUganda Bureau of StatisticsUWAUganda Wildlife AuthorityVUVulnerable (IUCN Red List)Appendix D-iii

Appendix DStrategic Environmental Assessment Report1Introduction1.1ObjectivesThe objectives of this study are to assess the impact of the power source and proposed project sitesin Uganda from positive and negative points of view and to identify one prospective site forfollow-up site survey.1.2MethodImpact assessments are conducted based on the Strategic Impact Assessment (SEA) method,because this stage is before feasibility study, and the project site and design have not yet beendecided. There are three SEAs stages in this study. The first stage is for seven alternative powersources, the second stage is for seven potential sites, and the third stage is for three candidatelayouts. All the alternatives are analyzed from economic, environmental, and social points of view.Available quantitative data are evaluated. First and second analyses are based on document survey,and third analyses are based on the site survey.1.3ScheduleThe first stage was conducted from November 2009 to January 2010, the second stage fromNovember 2009 to February 2010, and the third stage from February 2010 to January 2011. Twostakeholder meetings are held for each stage, one for discussion on TOR/SEA and the second fordiscussion on result of SEAs. Site survey of the third stage was conducted from July to October2010.Appendix D-1

Table 1.3-12009Nov DecSchedule of the three nFeb1 Scenario Review Stage(a) Confirmation of scenarios(b) Scoping (Preparation of evaluation framework)(c) 1st SHM (discussion on the evaluation framework)(d) confirmation of electricity demand(e) Information collection(f) Impact Assessment(g) 2nd SHM (Discussion on the evaluation result)(h) Information disclosure 2 Site Selection Stage(a) Confirmation of potential points (Long List)(b) Scoping (Preparation of evaluation framework)(c) 1st SHM (Discussion on the evaluation framework)(d) Information collection(e) Impact Assessment (Long list)(i) 2nd SHM (Discussion on the evaluation result)(j) Information disclosure 3 Site Survey Stage(a) Confirmation of the possible layouts(b) Scoping (Preparation of Evaluation Framework)(c) 2nd SHM (Discussion on the evaluation framework)(d) Site survey(e) Impact Assessment(f) 3rd SHM (Discussion on the evaluation result)(g) Information disclosure 4 Master Plan Preparation Stage(a) Preparation on TOR/EIA of F/S stage(b) Preparation on Environmental and Social checklist(c) Preparation of guideline for SHM2Regulatory Requirements2.1SEA for 1st and 2nd stagesThe SEA study on stage 1 and stage 2 is based on the following guidelines. GUIDELINES FOR STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT (SEA) (December 2006,NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY) The Constitution of Uganda (1995, article 39: Every Ugandan has a right to a clean andhealthy environment) The National Environment Policy, 1994, Energy Policy, Renewable energy policy and varioussectoral policies National Environment Act CAP 153 JICA (April 2004) “Japan International Cooperation Agency Guidelines for Environmentaland Social Considerations”2.2EIA for site surveyThe EIA procedure in stage 3 is based on following regulation and guidelines. �ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE ENERGYSECTOR” National Environment Management Authority (July 1997) “GUIDELINES FORENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN UGANDA”Appendix D-2

The Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 1998, UPPC JICA (April 2004) “Japan International Cooperation Agency Guidelines for Environmentaland Social Considerations”After reviewing the project brief, this project is categorized as “no EIA needed” by NEMA.Therefore, JICA conducted SEA.3Existing Environmental and Social Conditions3.1Uganda3.1.13.1.1.1Physical EnvironmentTopographyUganda is located around 1 degree north latitude and 32 degrees east longitude. Altitude in thecountry ranges from 621 m (Lake Albert) to 5,110 m (Mount Stanley). Land form in the centralplain is gently undulating from south to north.Figure 3.1-13.1.1.2TopographyHydrologyThere are four large lakes in Uganda, Lake Victoria, Lake Choga, Lake Albert, and Lake Edward.The Victoria Nile starts at Lake Victoria, flows through Lake Choga and Lake Albert, and flows outto Sudan.Appendix D-3

Figure 3.1-23.1.2HydrologyNatural Environment3.1.2.1Endangered SpeciesThe number of IUCN red list species in Uganda is 1838, including Animalia and Plantae. Thenumber of ACTINOPTERYGII categorized in CR (Critically Endangered) is relatively high. Thisis considered attributable to the impact on domestic species by Nile perch (Lates niloticus) stockedin Lake Victoria. Among mammals, 8 species, including mountain gorilla, are EN (Endangered),and 13 species, including Hippopotamus, are VU (Vulnerable).Table 3.1-1KingdomANIMALIANumber of IUCN Red List species in nd TotalRed List status*EN VU 111101,838*Extinct (EX); Critically Endangered (CR); Endangered (EN); Vulnerable (VU); Near Threatened (NT); LeastConcern (LC)Source: IUCN Web site (http://www.iucnredlist.org/)Appendix D-4

TERYGIIINSECTAPLANTAEEXCRENVUNTSource: IUCN Web site (http://www.iucnredlist.org/)Figure 3.1-3Number of IUCN Red List species in UGANDAIn terms of Mammal and Amphibian, the distribution of EN, VU, and NT of IUCN red list speciesare mainly concentrated around the lakes on the western side of the country.Source: IUCN Web site (http://www.iucnredlist.org/)Figure 3.1-4Distribution of endangered species (Mammal and Amphibian)Appendix D-5

3.1.2.2Protected AreasMany kinds of protected areas, such as national parks, Wildlife Reserves, and Community WildlifeManagement Areas, are in Uganda. The largest national park is Murchison Falls National Park,which is 3,867km2, the same size as Saitama Prefecture (see エラー! 参照元が見つかりません。).Source: World Database on Protected Areas (http://www.wdpa.org )/ National Forest Authority Uganda/ NatureUganda (JICA revised)Figure 3.1-53.1.33.1.3.1Protected Area in UGANDASocial EnvironmentAdministrative BoundariesAdministrative divisions in Uganda consist of Districts (Local Councils: LC5), Counties (LC4),Sub-counties (LC3), Parishes (LC2), and Villages (LC1) in rural areas, and Districts/Cities (LC5),Municipalities (LC4), Towns/Divisions (LC3), Wards (LC2), and Cells (LC1) in urban areas. Sinceestablishment of the decentralization policy in 1991, the number of Districts has increased,reaching 80 in July 2006 (see Figure 3.1-6) and 112 in July 2010 (GIS data is not available).Appendix D-6

Source: Uganda Bureau of StatisticsFigure 3.1-63.1.3.2Administrative Boundaries by District, 2007PopulationThe total population of Uganda in 2002 was 24,227,300 according to the census, and it wasestimated at 32,360,558 in 2009. Population growth rate in 2009 was estimated at 2.692% per year.Population density is comparatively high on the north coast of Lake Victoria and lower in thenortheast area (see Figure 3.1-7).Appendix D-7

Source: Uganda Bureau of StatisticsFigure 3.1-73.1.3.3Population Density (Person/Km2) by District, 2002Ethnic GroupsThe population of Uganda is made up of different ethnic groups. Fifty-six tribal groups are listed inthe 1995 Constitution of Uganda. As the figure below shows, the Baganda, accounting for 17.7percent, is the largest group, followed by the Banyankole (10.0%) and the Basoga (8.9%). Thedominance of the Baganda has been observed since the 1948 Census.Baganda, 17.7%Other Ugandans,31.4%Banyankole,10.0%Basoga, 8.9%Lugbara, 4.4%Bagisu, 4.8%Acholi, 4.9%Langi,6.4%Iteso,6.7 %Bakiga,7.2%Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-8Distribution of Population by Ethnic Groups, 2002Appendix D-8

Among other Ugandans, which account for 31.4 percent of total population, there are smallerethnic groups. The table below shows fifteen ethnic groups that have populations less than 25,000.Table 3.1-2Populations of Small Number Ethnic Groups, 2002Ethnic uChopeBatukuBanyaraSo(Tepeth)All 0,61221,527160,799% Share of 692Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusThe ethnic groups are headed by traditional kings or chiefs, who are not politically elected but havea significant influence in community governance and moral formation. They play a major role inshaping the behaviours and ways of life of the people in the region. Therefore, it is essential forany hydropower development project to share information with ethnic leaders in order to avoidmisunderstanding on the project and to get their opinions.Appendix D-9

3.1.3.4Land-useSource: National Forest AuthorityFigure 3.1-93.1.3.53.1.3.5.1Land UseEconomic ActivitiesAgricultureAgriculture is the dominant economic activity in Uganda; its contribution to total GDP in 2008 was21.5 percent (2009 Statistical Abstract). Most industries and services are dependent on theagricultural sector. The sector provides over 70 percent of the working population 1 (2002Population and Housing Census). However, most farmers are subsistence farmers; they produceprimarily for their own consumption but may sell some of the products. As the figure below shows,the majority of people in rural areas depend on subsistence agriculture, such as crop growing,livestock rearing, fishing, hunting, and gathering. The lowest percentage of subsistence farmers isfound in the Central region, including the Kampala and Wakiso Districts.1All persons aged five years and above whose status is paid employee, self employed, or unpaid family worker.Appendix D-10

Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-10Main Source of Living by District, 2002The major agricultural products in Uganda include banana, cassava, sweet potato, maize, beans,millet, sorghum, peanuts, coffee, and sesame. The production of these crops, other than coffee,during 2003 to 2008 is shown in the table below.Appendix D-11

Table 3.1-3BananaCassavaMaizeMilletSweet PotatoesSorghumBeansPeanutsSesameProduction of Selected Food Crops 4154166(Thousand 3650670458477430440162173168173Source: Uganda Bureau of StatisticsThe distribution of these crops by number of plots by District is shown in the figure below. Banana,which has the largest production, is found mostly in the Central and Western regions. Coffeegrowing follows the same pattern, but has an extra concentration in the Eastern Districts aroundMount Elgon. Coffee is the dominant export commodity, accounting for 23.4 percent of total value,US 1,724.3 million in 2008 (2009 Statistical Abstract). The growing of cassava, peanuts, sweetpotato, and beans is more evenly distributed throughout the country. Maize is produced mostly inthe Eastern region. Millet and sorghum are produced in the Eastern, Northern, and Western regions.Sesame is mostly grown in the Northern region.Source: Agricultural Statistics 2002Figure 3.1-11Number of Crop Plots by District, 2002Appendix D-12

3.1.3.5.2LivestockLivestock production plays a key role in raising incomes of households and providing a source ofprotein to many people. Livestock products include milk, beef, pork, goat meat/mutton, andchicken. The table below shows major livestock in Uganda and their population trends. On average,the populations of cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, and poultry have increased over the period.Table 21,77835,903Number of livestock thousand 22,18626,95027,508Source: Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries and Uganda Bureau of StatisticsThe distribution of these livestock by District is shown in the figure below. It reveals that whileindigenous cattle are distributed over all Districts, exotic/crossbreed cattle are concentrated inmajor urban areas, such as Kampala and Wakiso Districts, as well as in traditional cattle-rearingand milk-producing areas such as the Mbarara District. The relatively high concentration ofexotic/crossbreed cattle are also found in typical pastoral areas in the Northeast.As the figure shows, rearing of goats is common in most Districts in Uganda, whereas rearing ofsheep is found mainly in the extreme Northeast and Northwest. Rearing of pigs is moreconcentrated in the Central and Western regions along Lake Victoria. Also, there is a highconcentration of pig rearing in the Moyo District in the North and in Kumi District in the East.As for poultry, 46.4 percent of total agricultural households keep local chicken, whereas only 0.7percent keep exotic/crossbreed chicken (Agricultural Statistics 2002). The exotic/crossbreedchickens are concentrated in the Central region. This is due to the high demand for eggs andcooking chickens in the Kampala, Wakiso, and Mukono Districts. Local chickens are found allover the country.Appendix D-13

Source: Agricultural Statistics 2002Figure 3.1-123.1.3.5.3Number of Households with Livestock by District, 2002FishingFishing is carried out on almost all lakes in Uganda. Lake Victoria is the largest body of water inUganda. As the table below shows, more than a half of fish are caught in Lake Victoria. Albert Nile(a part of the River Nile from Lake Victoria to Lake Albert) contributes only 1.3 percent of totalcatch.Table 3.1-5Fish Catch by Water Body 2003 – 2007Lake VictoriaLake AlbertAlbert NileLake KyogaLake Edward, George & Kazinga ChannelOther 16.8(thousand 1367.2374.3Source: Fisheries Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and FisheriesAccording to the Agricultural Statistics 2002, 0.2 percent of agricultural households reportedcarrying out fish farming with ponds. As the figure below shows, tilapia is the dominant fish inponds in the country, followed by mirror carp and clarias (African catfish).Appendix D-14

Source: Agricultural Statistics 2002Figure 3.1-133.1.3.6Types of Fish in Ponds by District, 2002Education and LiteracyUganda’s education system includes formal and informal education. Formal education comprisestraining at primary school for seven years, secondary education for four years for “O (ordinary)”level and two years for “A (advanced)” level, and tertiary education from three to five years.Informal education trains beneficiaries in basic skills of education such as reading, writing, andnumeracy.The Government of Uganda introduced the Universal Primary Education (UPE) policy in 1997.The implementation of this policy has caused tremendous changes in primary enrolment, which hasincreased from 3.1 million in 1996 to 7.4 million in 2008 (2009 Statistical Abstract). The tablebelow shows basic indicators of primary education in the country.Appendix D-15

Table 3.1-6Primary School Education Indicators in UgandaEnrolmentNumber of Primary TeachersNumber of Primary SchoolsPupil Teacher RatioPupil Classroom RatioGross Enrolment RateGross Intake RateNet Enrolment RateNet Intake : Planning Unit, Ministry of Education and SportsThe Gross Enrolment Rate (GER) 2 and Gross Intake Rate (GIR) 3 are greater than 100. This meansthat more pupils enrolled in primary school before the age of six years or lasted beyond the age oftwelve years in primary school. This frequently happens in rural areas in Uganda, where manypupils repeat the same grade due to exam failure.The Net Enrolment Rate (NER) 4 can more accurately reflect participation than GER, because itrefers to the proportion of the total enrolment of official school-age population to thecorresponding age group. NER by District is shown the figure below. It reveals that the Centralregion has the highest participation, while the Northern region, including the Moroto andNakapiripirit Districts, has the lowest (20.2 and 18.5 percent respectively).2Gross Enrolment Rate is the ratio of pupils in primary school (regardless of age) to the country total population agedsix to twelve years.3Gross Intake Rate is the ratio of pupils enrolled in primary one (P1) (regardless of age) to the country total populationaged six years.4Net Enrolment Rate is the ratio of pupils in primary school aged six to twelve to the country total population aged sixto twelve years. Net Intake Rate is the ratio of the pupils aged six in primary one (P1) to the country total populationaged six years.Appendix D-16

Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-14Primary School Net Enrolment Rate by DistrictAccording to the 2002 Population and Housing Census, about one-fifth (19 percent) of all personsaged 6 years and above had never attended school, while nearly two-fifths left school before 2002,and 41 percent were attending school. The proportion that had never been to school was muchhigher among females (25 percent) than males (14 percent).Literacy is defined as the ability to read with understanding and write meaningfully in anylanguage. In 2002, the literacy rate for persons aged 10 years and above was 70 percent. This was agreat improvement compared with the level of 54 percent in 1991. However, wide genderdisparities still exist in literacy rate, with 77 percent of males being literate compared to 62 percentof females. The figure below shows that gender disparity in literacy rates exists in all age groupsexcept ten to fourteen years.Appendix D-17

1415‐2425‐4445‐5960 Age GroupSource: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-15Literacy Rate by Age and GenderAs the figure below shows, the Central region has the highest literacy at 82 percent, while theNorthern region has the lowest at 60 percent. The Eastern and Western regions recorded literacyrates of 63 percent and 70 percent respectively. Literacy rates are similar among males and femalesin the Central region.Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-16Literacy Rate by District, 2002Appendix D-18

3.1.3.7Health and SanitationAccess to safe water and good sanitation are very crucial to the health of people. The 2002 Censusshowed that 61 percent of households had access to safe water, as compared to 26 percent in 1991.According to the figure below, access to safe water is much higher (96 percent on average) inurban areas, such as Kampala and Jinja, than in rural areas (76 percent on average).Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-17Household within 1 km from Safe Water by District, 2002The distance to a health facility has a strong impact on access to health care. Health facilitiesinclude hospitals and health centres; a health centre is intended to cover a given administrative area.The figure below shows the proportion of the households which are within five kilometres from ahealth facility. It reveals that the proportion is lower in the Northern region (around 66 percent) andhigher in the Central region (78 percent).Appendix D-19

Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-18Household within 5 km from Health Facility by District, 2002Findings of the 2002 Census indicate that toilet coverage was not universal in Uganda. Nearlyone-third of households did not have a toilet facility (14 percent were using an uncovered pitlatrine and 17 percent had no facility at all). There has been an improvement in the pit latrinecoverage at the national level, from 58 percent in 2006 to 63 percent in 2008. The figure belowpresents pit latrine coverage by District.Appendix D-20

Source: 2002 Population and Housing CensusFigure 3.1-193.1.3.8Households with a Toilet by District, 2002Tourism and CultureThe tourism industry in Uganda has expanded in the last two decades as a result of improvedsecurity and better facilities for tourists.Uganda’s major tourist attractions are its national parks and wildlife reserves. The table belowprovides the number of visitors to the ten main national parks within the country. These parks offerdifferent tourism activities, such as gorilla tracking, nature guided walks, village walks, butterflywatching, bird watching, and rare fauna species.Appendix D-21

20022003200420052006200720082009YearMurchison Falls National ParkQueen Elizabeth National ParkKidepo Valley National ParkLake Muburo National ParkRwenzori Mountains National ParkBwindi Impenetrable National ParkMgahinga Gorrila National ParkSemliki National ParkKibale National Park and KatongaMount Elgon National ParkSource: Uganda Wildlife AuthorityFigure 3.1-20Visitors to the National Parks (Citizen and Foreigners) 2002- 2009Tourists also like to visit natural features such as lakes, rivers, waterfalls, mountains, and hotsprings and cul

Laboratory Test Results Appendix C - 123 . Appendix C - 124 . Appendix C - 125 . Appendix C - 126 . . Preparation of guideline for SHM . The Constitution of Uganda (1995, article 39: Every Ugandan has a right to a clean and healthy environment) The National Environment Policy,

Related Documents:

4. 12 Meter (40') Drop Within Test 5. Fast Cook-Off Within Test 6. Slow Cook-Off Within Test 7. Bullet Impact Within Test 8. Fragment Impact Within Test 9. Sympathetic Detonation Within Test 10. Shaped Charge Jet Impact Within Test 11. Spall Impact Within Test 12. Specialty Within Test 13. Specialty Within Test 14. Specialty Within Test 15 .

Tabel 4. Pre-test and Post-test Data of athletes'' arm strength, abdominal strength, back strength and leg strength. Subject No. Arm Strength Abdominal Strength Back Strength Leg Strength Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test Pre-Test Post-Test 1

Test-takers do not bring anything into the testing room, and they do not leave until they have finished the test and returned all test materials. If a test-taker must leave the room before completing the test, that test-taker is not permitted to return to the test room and finish the test. Instead, the test-taker is scheduled for retesting with

test test test test test test test test test test 4 - 6 ADS2 Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP) Idee: nutze bereits gelesene Information bei einem Mismatch - verschiebe ggf. Muster um mehr als 1 Position nach rechts - gehe im Text nie zurück! Allgemeiner Zusammenhang - Mismatch an Textposition i mit j-tem Zeichen im Muster - j-1 vorhergehende Zeichen .

Table of Contents Sequence strong List /strong . Unit 0 1 Introduction 2 How to take the placement tests 3 Placement Test I 4 Placement Test II 5 Placement Test III 6 Placement Test IV 7 Placement Test V 8 Placement Test VI 9 Placement Test VII 10 Placement Test VIII 11 Placement Test IX 12 Placement Test X

Basic Divergence Test. p-Series Test. Integral Test. Basic Comparison Test. Limit Comparison Test. Root Test Ratio Test . Alternating Series Test for Conve

EPA Test Method 1: EPA Test Method 2 EPA Test Method 3A. EPA Test Method 4 . Method 3A Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide . EPA Test Method 3A. Method 6C SO. 2. EPA Test Method 6C . Method 7E NOx . EPA Test Method 7E. Method 10 CO . EPA Test Method 10 . Method 25A Hydrocarbons (THC) EPA Test Method 25A. Method 30B Mercury (sorbent trap) EPA Test Method .

3 Lorsqu’un additif présent dans un arôme, un additif ou une enzyme alimentaire a une fonction technologique dans la denrée alimentaire à laquelle il est adjoint, il est considéré comme additif de cette denrée alimentaire, et non de l’arôme, de l’additif ou de l’enzyme alimentaire ajouté et doit dès lors remplir les conditions d’emploi définies pour la denrée en question .