2017 Psychology Licensing Exam Scores By Doctoral
2017Psychology Licensing Exam Scoresby Doctoral ProgramPrepared byAssociation of State and Provincial Psychology BoardsP.O. Box 3079Peachtree City, GA 30269678- ‐216- ‐1175
2016 by the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards. All rightsreserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form without thepermission in writing of the Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards.For information, contact: Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards, P.O.Box 3079, Peachtree City, GA 30269.
ContentsForeword .2The Purposes of the Examination.4Test Construction .4Test Content and Administration .6Content Outline of the EPPP .7Further Information.8Table 1. Item Development and Test Construction Flowchart .9Table 2. Content Outline of the EPPP for Administrationsfrom April 1, 1997 through July 31, 2011 .10Table 3. Content Outline of the EPPP for Administrationsfrom August 1, 2011 Forward.11Table 4. Psychology Licensing Exam Scores by Doctoral Program .12 Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards12016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
ForewordThe Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards (ASPPB) is pleased to presentthe twenty-third edition of Psychology Licensing Exam Scores by Doctoral Program. Itincludes graduate training programs accredited by the American Psychological Associationor Canadian Psychological Association, or designated by the Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards and the Council for the National Register of Health ServiceProviders in Psychology (ASPPB/NR Designated). Since 2015, this report has been presentedin a different format from previous editions in that only first time test takers are reportedinstead of all test events. The data includes all candidates who took the exam for the first timeduring the period from February 2015 to March 21, 2017. The start date coincides with thetransition to ASPPB’s new testing vendor and the data for future editions will include expandeddate ranges.The list of Doctoral Programs in Psychology is accompanied by statistical information on theperformance of candidates for licensure by graduate program on the Examination forProfessional Practice in Psychology (EPPP). ASPPB considers a passing point forindependent practice equal to a scaled score of 500. The statistical information forcandidates includes, where the number is five or greater, the number of candidates testingfrom the program, the pass rate, and percent scores by content area. Where the number ofcandidates tested per program is four or fewer, neither number tested nor pass rate isshown. This is done to protect the privacy of candidates who come from programs with lownumbers of graduates. Pass rate information in this report is presented on the basis of thenumber of candidates with a scaled score of 500 or more (e.g., an “ASPPB Pass Score”).Responsibility for actual pass/fail decisions rests with individual licensing jurisdictions.Please note that care should be exercised if comparisons across schools are made. Ifperformance on the EPPP is seen as an outcome measure of those objectives, it should beviewed as only one such measure.The program data presented are based solely on information supplied by candidateswhen they apply to sit for the EPPP. Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards22016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
We believe that those who train psychologists and those who examine them for licensuremust maintain an ongoing dialogue if candidates for licensure and the consumers ofpsychological services are to be well served. Our intent is to make Psychology LicensingExam Scores by Doctoral Program a document that will inform and influence individualsselecting a doctoral program, educators of psychologists, and the developers of the EPPP.To that end, we encourage your comments and suggestions. Correspondence should besent to the ASPPB central office at the address below.We sincerely hope that this document will prove useful to faculty members and students ofpsychology. We very much appreciate your interest in licensure and the EPPP.Don Meck, Ph.D.,President, Board ofDirectorsStephen T. DeMers, Ed.D.Chief Executive OfficerMatt Turner, Ph.D.Director of Examination ServicesAmy Hilson, CAEAssociate Executive Officer forExams and GovernanceAssociation of State and ProvincialPsychology Boards (ASPPB)P.O. Box 3079Peachtree City, GA 30269 Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards32016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
The Purposes of the ExaminationThe EPPP is intended to evaluate the knowledgethat the most recent practice analysis hasdetermined as foundational to the competentpractice of psychology. Most candidates takingthe EPPP have obtained a doctoral degree inpsychology, a year of supervised experience,and appropriate postdoctoral experience.Such candidates are expected to haveacquired a broad basic knowledge ofpsychology, regardless of individualspecialties. This knowledge and the candidate’sability to apply it are assessed through thecandidate’s responses to objective, multiple- ‐choice questions representative of the field atlarge. The average pass rate of doctoral levelcandidates who are taking the test for the firsttime exceeds 80% in the most recent sampleyears.The Examination for Professional Practice inPsychology (EPPP), developed and owned bythe Association of State and Provincial PsychologyBoards (ASPPB), is provided to state andprovincial boards of psychology to assist them intheir evaluation of the qualifications of applicantsfor licensure and certification. This standardizedexamination is administered continuously incomputerized delivery format through thePearson network of computer testing centerswith the support of state and provincialpsychology boards acting collectively throughASPPB.The resources of individual psychologists, ASPPB,and contracted test development professionalsare used in the ongoing development andimprovements to the Examination Program.These combined resources are greater than thoseavailable to any individual board. The EPPP is onlyone part of the evaluation procedure used bystate and provincial boards. In order todetermine candidates’ competence to practicethe profession of psychology, most boardssupplement the EPPP with other requirementsand/or assessment procedures.ASPPB and member boards cannot send copiesof past examinations to applicants.Test ConstructionThe ASPPB Examination Committee (ExC) isresponsible for the construction of the EPPP. ExCmembers are appointed by the Board of Directorsof ASPPB and are chosen for their outstandingcredentials and exceptional Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boardsachievements in their respective specialties.The examination development process isintended to maximize the content validity of42016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
5. A draft examination is constructed onthe basis of a content outline derived from a jobanalysis and role delineation study of theprofession of psychology (see below). At ameeting of the ExC, the preliminary draft isreviewed item by item. Items are reviewed,validated, and/or replaced with bank items inaccordance with the test specifications and theExC’s expert judgment. This draft is made uponly of items with known psychometricproperties.the examination. The ASPPB Item DevelopmentCommittee (IDC) is also appointed by the ASPPBBoard of Directors and charged to oversee theitem writing process. Members of the IDC arechosen for their expertise and credentials in thespecific domains that comprise the content of theEPPP.A brief outline of the item development and testconstruction process follows:6. A final form of the examination is constructedon the basis of the ExC’s review andcomments. The final form of the examination isthen uploaded into the network for delivery atlocal test centers. The finalized form of theexamination is supplemented with 50 items forpre-testing. The purpose of the pre-testing istwo-fold: 1. To gather psychometric data onnewly developed items which ensures that theyare performing within acceptable statisticalparameters before the item is used as a scoreditem on an exam. 2. To collect statisticalinformation used to equate exams which ensuresthat every candidate receives an exam ofequitable difficulty. These pre-test items arerandomly distributed throughout theexamination and are not counted as part of acandidate’s score.1. Individuals with expertise in specific domains ofthe EPPP are selected as item writers. Membersof the IDC train item writers on how to writequestions for the EPPP and on how to use onlinetools for securely submitting questions to beconsidered for the EPPP item bank.2. Item writers develop questions and submitthem for review. A process of validationoccurs between the item writer and asubject- ‐matter expert on the IDC. Itemsare evaluated for style, format, subjectmatter accuracy, relevance to practice,professional level of mastery, contributionto public protection, and freedom frombias.3. Once judged by the IDC subject- matter expertto be of sufficient quality, items then receive anadditional level of editorial and psychometricreview by editorial staff to ensure conformity toestablished psychometric principles and EPPPStyle Guidelines.Members of ExC and the IDC are listed in the“EPPP Exam Information” section of the ASPPBwebsite at http://www.asppb.net.A flowchart of this process can be found inTable 14. Items that are approved by IDC subject- ‐ matterexperts and by editorial staff are then enteredinto the EPPP item bank. Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards52016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Test Content and Administrationcorrect response. There is no additional penalty forincorrect answers. The candidate should choosethe single best answer to each item.The examination covers eight content areas:biological bases of behavior; cognitive-affectivebases of behavior; social and cultural bases ofbehavior; growth and lifespan development;assessment and diagnosis; treatment, intervention,prevention and supervision; research methods andstatistics; and ethical, legal, and professionalissues. The percent of the examination devoted toeach of the topics and specific sub-areas to betested are provided in detail in Table 2(administrations from April 1, 1997 through JulyThe EPPP is administered under standardizedconditions ay Computer Based Test centers. Onlycandidates approved by a state or provincial boardas applicants for licensure are allowed to take theEPPP. EPPP scores are reported as scaled scores,with a range from 200 to 800. ASPPB considers thepassing point for independent practice equal to ascaled score of 500. The statistical information forcandidates includes:31, 2011) and Table 3 (administrations fromAugust 1, 2011 forward). The examination consistsof objective multiple choice questions coveringknowledge essential to the professional practice ofpsychology. Each form of the examination contains225 items, of which 175 are scored and 50 are pretest items. (The pre-test items do not count in acandidate’s final score.)Each item has four possible responses, only one ofwhich is the correct answer. The total number ofcorrect responses determines a candidate’s score.Therefore, it is to the candidate’s advantage toanswer every item even when uncertain of the Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards Where the number is five or greater, the numberof candidates testing from the program, the passrate, and percent scores by content area. Where the number of candidates tested perprogram is four or fewer, neither number testednor pass rate is shown. This is done to protectthe privacy of candidates who come fromprograms with low numbers of graduates.62016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Content Outline of the EPPPFor EPPP Administrations through July 31, 2011the content areas and knowledge required inpractice. In keeping with changes incontemporary practice, special focus wasplaced on newer areas of the profession thathave received empirical support.At the completion of an extensive Practice Analysisstudy in 1995, the test specifications for the EPPPwere revised. These specifications, included hereinin Table 2, were implemented for the first timewith the development and administration of theApril 1997 EPPP. Eight, rather than five, contentdomains were identified as being related to currentpractice. In 2003, a Practice Analysis Update wasconducted to refine the delineation of roles andresponsibilities performed by psychologists andThe EPPP performance of students in the variousdoctoral programs through July 31,2011 has been summarized in Table 4 of thisreport, and is based on the test specificationsshown in Table 2.EPPP Administrations from August 1, 2011 ForwardIn 2010 at the completion of a 24 month longvalidation study entitled An Analysis of ProfessionalPractice with a Focus on the Validation andAssessment of Competencies, the testspecifications for the EPPP were again revised.These specifications, which are included herein asTable 3, were implemented for the first time withthe development and administration of the August2011 EPPP.Data provided in this version of this report isbased on the test specifications in Table 3.In 2015, ASPPB began testing with a newexamination vendor. The information presentedin this report includes only data collected sincethat vendor transition. Each year, additional datawill be added to the report until five years of dataare available. After five years of data arereported, each subsequent report will includeonly the most recent five year window ofcandidate score information.The practice analysis resulted in the identificationand validation of underlying professionalcompetencies; the identification ofAssessment methods to best measure underlyingprofessional competencies; and revised testspecifications for the Examination for ProfessionalPractice in Psychology (EPPP) updating theknowledge base and integrating additionalrelevant competencies. The full practice analysisreport, as well as an executive summary report, isavailable at www.asppb.net/practiceanalysis. Association of State andProvincial Psychology BoardsAs stated in the Foreword, prior to the 2015vendor transition, scores were reported for alltest administrations. Scores are now reported forfirst time test takers only. This is a morecommon method of reporting pass rate data.72016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Further InformationTo obtain more information about:Procedures and requirements for licensure andboard approval for taking the EPPP: contact thepsychology licensing or certification board in thestate or province in which licensure orcertification is being sought. A listing ofaddresses of state and provincial boards isavailable from the ASPPB website at:www.asppb.net/ContactLicensingBoardsASPPB and the EPPP Examination Program, itspolicies and procedures: call ASPPB toll- ‐ free at1- ‐800- ‐448- ‐4069 between the hours of 8:30 amand 5:00 pm EST;Requirements for licensure/certification in thevarious jurisdictions: access ASPPB’s Handbook ofLicensing and Certification Requirements forPsychologists in North America for no charge atwww.asppb.net/Handbook; Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards82016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Table 1. Item Development and Test Construction FlowchartThe Item Development Committee (IDC) of ASPPB identifies potential subject-matter experts tobecome item writers for the EPPPThe IDC trains item-writers, either at Item Writer Workshops (IWW) or by conference calls,about the “do’s and don’ts” of item-writingItem writers produce questions, either in advance of IWWs or prior to each ExC meeting, each wayallowing items to be written from their homes or offices where they have access to referencematerials.Items are reviewed and validated by members of the IDC either at IWWs or whenItems have been submitted. Items are evaluated and rated for accuracy, relevance, professionallevel of mastery, contribution to public protection, and freedom from bias.If approved by IDC domain expert, items are entered into the EPPP item bank.Items are edited and brought into compliance with EPPP style guidelines.Calibrated Item BankItems are chosen for a preliminary draft of theEPPP from the Calibrated EPPP Item BankStandard Item BankItems are chosen for pretesting from the StandardEPPP Item Bank.Calibrated Item BankThe draft EPPP is reviewed by the ASPPBExamination Committee item-by-item. Substituteitems may be chosen from the Calibrated ItemBankStandard Item BankDraft pretest items are reviewed by theASPPB Examination Committee itemby-item.The Examination Committee finalizes exam forms, including pretestitems, based on expert judgment, item statistics, and multiple reviews.EPPP exam is uploaded to the PearsonSystem.Candidates take the EPPP exam.The EPPP is scored on site. Candidates receive score reports after administration. Jurisdictionsreceive Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards92016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Table 2. Content Outline of the EPPP forAdministrations from April 1, 1997 through July 31, 2011Percent of theExam*RubricContent Area01Biological Bases of Behavior — knowledge of (a) biological and neural bases of behavior,(b) psychopharmacology, and (c) methodologies supporting this body of knowledge11%02Cognitive- ‐Affective Bases of Behavior — knowledge of (a) cognition & its neural bases,(b) theories & empirical bases of learning, memory, motivation, affect, emotion, &executive function, & (c) factors that influence cognitive performance and/or emotionalexperience & their interaction13%03Social and Multicultural Bases of Behavior — knowledge of (a) intrapersonal,12%interpersonal, intragroup, & intergroup processes and dynamics, (b) theories ofpersonality, & (c) issues in diversity04Growth and Lifespan Development — knowledge of (a) age- ‐appropriate development13%across the life span, (b) atypical patterns of development, & (c) the protective & riskfactors that influence developmental outcomes for individuals05Assessment and Diagnosis — knowledge of (a) psychometrics, (b) assessment models &14%instruments, (c) assessment methods for initial status of & change by individuals, couples,families, groups, & organizations/systems, and (d) diagnostic classification systems & theirlimitations06Treatment, Intervention, and Prevention — knowledge of (a) individual, couple, family,15%group, organizational, or community interventions for specific concerns/disorders indiverse populations, (b) intervention & prevention theories, (c) best practices, & (d)consultation models & processes07Research Methods and Statistics — knowledge of (a) research design, methodology, &7%program evaluation, (b) instrument selection & validation, and (c) statistical models,assumptions, and procedures08Ethical/Legal/Professional Issues — knowledge of (a) codes of ethics, (b) professional15%standards for practice, (c) legal mandates and restrictions, (d) guidelines for ethicaldecision- ‐making, and (e) professional training and supervision*As approved by the ASPPB Board of Directors on June 21, 2003 Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards102016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Table 3. Content Outline of the EPPP forAdministrations from August 1, 2011 ForwardRubricPercent ofthe Exam*Content Area01Biological Bases of Behavior –– knowledge of (a) biological and neural bases of behavior,(b) psychopharmacology, and (c) methodologies supporting this body of knowledge12%02Cognitive- ‐Affective Bases of Behavior— knowledge of (a) cognition, (b) theories andempirical bases of learning, memory, motivation, affect, emotion, and executive function,13%and (c) factors that influence cognitive performance and/or emotional experience andtheir interaction030405Social and Cultural Bases of Behavior — knowledge of (a) interpersonal, intrapersonal,intergroup, and intragroup processes and dynamics, (b) theories of personality, and (c)diversity issues12%Growth and Lifespan Development — knowledge of (a) development across the full lifespan, (b) atypical patterns of development, and (c) the protective and risk factors thatinfluence developmental trajectories of individuals12%Assessment and Diagnosis — knowledge of (a) psychometrics, (b) assessment models andinstruments, (c) assessment methods for initial status of and change by individuals,14%couples, families, groups, and organizations/systems, and (d) diagnostic classificationsystems and their limitations0607086.Treatment, Intervention, Prevention, and Supervision — knowledge of (a) individual,couple, family, group, organizational, or community interventions for specificproblems/disorders in diverse populations, (b) intervention and prevention theories, (c)best practices and practice guidelines, (d) consultation and supervision models, and (e)evidence supporting efficacy and effectiveness of interventions14%Research Methods and Statistics — knowledge of (a) research design, methodology, andprogram evaluation, (b) instrument selection and validation, (c) statistical models,assumptions, and procedures, and (d) dissemination methods8%Ethical/Legal/Professional Issues — knowledge of (a) codes of ethics, (b) professionalstandards for practice, (c) legal mandates and restrictions, (d) guidelines for ethicaldecision- ‐making, and (e) professional training and supervision15%** Approved by the ASPPB Board of Directors on November 24, 2009 Association of State andProvincial Psychology Boards112016 Psychology Licensing ExamScores by Doctoral Program
Psychology Licensing Exam Scores by Doctoral Program, February 1, 2015 - February 28, 2017This report includes first time test takers from February 1, 2015 - February 28, 2017NOTE: The table below contains self‐report information on EPPP candidates who were first time test takers between February 1, 2015 and February 28, 2017. Only doctoral programs that are APA/CPAaccredited or have met ASPPB/National Register Joint Designation criteria are listed individually by name in the table. Programs who lost their accreditation/designation status during the previous year will nolonger be available for selection in the online application. All data for individual programs are shown when there are 5 or more graduates who tested from February 1, 2015 to February 28, 2017. When thereare 4 or fewer candidates who tested, neither the exact number nor the passrates are shown. These omissions serve to protect the privacy of individual candidates. The data include first time test taker passrates for candidates who took the exam during that period, not all administrations. The pass rates included in this table are based on the ASPPB passing score of 500 for independent practice.Ethical/Legal/Professional IssuesResearch Methods andStatisticsTreatment/InterventionAssessment andDiagnosisGrowth and LifespanDevelopmentSocial and Culturalbases of BehaviorCognitive-AffectiveBases of Behavior* Num 4 or lessPERCENT CORRECT BY CONTENT AREABiological Bases ofBehaviorEPPP GNATED DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN PSYCHOLOGYNUMPASSRATEDoctoral Program Not ListedMasters Degree Only1007118653.53%53.12%64.58% 65.99% 62.46% 64.78% 60.55% 62.70% 52.15% 70.61%62.98% 65.70% 62.43% 64.42% 60.06% 63.25% 52.22% 70.48%All Designated & AccreditedDoctoral Programs735480.81%71.03% 75.07% 72.43% 71.98% 69.77% 72.70% 63.85% 77.42%AB U. of AlbertaAB U. of CalgaryAB U. of CalgaryDept of Educ PsychDept of PsychGrad Progs in 33%87.50%80.00%68.17% 73.83% 64.33% 64.33% 69.83% 67.67% 60.67% 78.17%70.63% 72.38% 66.25% 71.13% 68.50% 76.50% 70.50% 75.75%59.80% 79.20% 58.00% 64.60% 63.40% 65.80% 61.60% 68.40%U.of Alaska-Fairbanks,AK AnchorageAL Auburn U.Dept of PsychClinical-PhD560.00%63.60% 62.80% 70.40% 60.80% 61.60% 65.00% 52.80% 72.00%Clinical-PhD1392.31%77.54% 77.31% 75.69% 76.77% 80.92% 81.69% 72.08% 00.00%62.38% 76.75% 70.25% 69.63% 65.50% 70.75% 59.75% 77.25%77.42% 82.25% 76.67% 82.08% 74.25% 83.17% 80.50% 80.33%ALALAuburn U.U. of Alabama BirminghamDept of PsychDept of Special Ed,Rehabiliation & CounselingDept of PsychALUniversity of Alabama atTuscaloosaDept of PsychClinical-PhD18100.00%74.00% 81.89% 76.94% 72.50% 76.78% 79.22% 70.56% 78.44%Dept of Psych and Dept ofProf StudiesCombined, ClinicalCounseling PsychologyPhD1090.00%72.80% 73.10% 67.10% 74.30% 71.90% 72.80% 66.40% 77.20%Dept of PsychDept of Psych & CounsDept of Psych & %72.00% 85.86% 79.57% 79.00% 75.86% 84.71% 79.57% 78.14%66.75% 72.75% 74.00% 69.00% 65.00% 75.00% 66.00% 78.75%76.00% 78.00% 67.00% 52.00% 64.00% 54.00% 86.00% 88.00%ALUniversity of SouthAlabamaAR U. of ArkansasAR U. of Central ArkansasAR U. of Central Arkansas
Arizona School ofProfessional Psychology atAZ Argosy University, PhoenixAZ Arizona State U.AZ Arizona State U.AZ Arizona State U.AZ Midwestern U.AZ Northern Arizona U.AZ U. of ArizonaAZ U. of ArizonaBC Simon Fraser U.Dept of PsychCounseling and CounselingPsychologyDept of PsychMary Lou Fulton TeachersCollegeDept of Clin PsychCntr for Excellence in EducEthical/Legal/Professional IssuesResearch Methods andStatisticsTreatment/InterventionAssessment andDiagnosisGrowth and LifespanDevelopmentSocial and Culturalbases of BehaviorCognitive-AffectiveBases of Behavior* Num 4 or lessPERCENT CORRECT BY CONTENT AREABiological Bases ofBehaviorEPPP GNATED DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN PSYCHOLOGYNUMPASSRATEClinical-PsyD3669.44%64.22% 71.61% 66.39% 66.58% 65.50% 67.69% 48.64% .71% 79.00% 79.57% 79.71% 69.43% 75.71% 76.71% 82.14%79.73% 84.33% 79.27% 80.60% 77.87% 85.47% 85.80% 0.00%76.47%57.14%73.20% 81.80% 73.20% 76.40% 80.60% 78.40% 88.60% 84.60%69.94% 71.59% 71.65% 72.18% 62.82% 72.00% 50.41% 79.76%61.86% 68.86% 64.00% 68.71% 72.29% 69.86% 62.14% 70.29%91088.89%100.00%70.44% 78.22% 70.33% 68.00% 69.00% 72.33% 64.33% 73.78%79.50% 82.70% 79.40% 80.00% 78.00% 78.50% 82.10% 77.70%Department of Disability andPsychoeducational Studies School-PhDDept of PsychClinical-PhDBCBCBCBCU. of British ColumbiaU. of British ColumbiaU. of British ColumbiaU. of VictoriaDept of PsychDept of Educ, Couns Psych &Special Ed.Dept of PsychSchool PsychologyDept of PsychClinical-PhD12100.00%80.08% 85.92% 81.33% 81.67% 80.25% 83.17% 82.17% %85.00%68.80%83.09%CACACACACACACACACAAlliant I.U.-FresnoAlliant I.U.-FresnoAlliant I.U.-Hong KongAlliant I.U.-Los AngelesAlliant I.U.-Los AngelesAlliant I.U.-SacramentoAlliant I.U.-San DiegoAlliant I.U.-San DiegoAlliant I.U.-San 76.22%CA Alliant I.U.-San Francisco Bay CSPPClinical-PsyD10263.73%65.83% 69.23% 66.79% 65.54% 64.10% 63.44% 49.49% 72.24%
Treatment/InterventionResearch Methods andStatisticsEthical/Legal/Professional Issues31.71%61.90%77.08%100.00%83.33%Assessment andDiagnosisPASSRATEGrowth and LifespanDevelopmentNUMSocial and Culturalbases of BehaviorPROGRAM* Num 4 or lessPERCENT CORRECT BY CONTENT AREACognitive-AffectiveBases of BehaviorEPPP PERFORMANCEBiological Bases ofBehaviorAmerican School ofProfessional Psychology atArgosy University, SanFrancisco Bay AreaArgosy U. - Orange CountyAzusa Pacific U.Biola U.Biola U.California GNATED DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN Clinical Psychology Program,Argosy University SanFrancisco Bay AreaSchool of Prof PsychDept of Grad PsychRosemead School of PsychRosemead School of PsychPsyD Program in ClinicalPsychologyClinical-PsyDClinic
Exam Scores by Doctoral Program a document that will inform and influence individuals selecting a doctoral program, educators of psychologists, and the developers of the EPPP. To that end, we encourage your comments and suggestions. Correspondence should
Past exam papers from June 2019 GRADE 8 1. Afrikaans P2 Exam and Memo 2. Afrikaans P3 Exam 3. Creative Arts - Drama Exam 4. Creative Arts - Visual Arts Exam 5. English P1 Exam 6. English P3 Exam 7. EMS P1 Exam and Memo 8. EMS P2 Exam and Memo 9. Life Orientation Exam 10. Math P1 Exam 11. Social Science P1 Exam and Memo 12.
GRADE 9 1. Afrikaans P2 Exam and Memo 2. Afrikaans P3 Exam 3. Creative Arts: Practical 4. Creative Arts: Theory 5. English P1 Exam 6. English P2 Exam 7. English P3 Exam 8. Geography Exam 9. Life Orientation Exam 10. MathP1 Exam 11. Math P2 Exam 12. Physical Science: Natural Science Exam 13. Social Science: History 14. Technology Theory Exam
Final Exam Answers just a click away ECO 372 Final Exam ECO 561 Final Exam FIN 571 Final Exam FIN 571 Connect Problems FIN 575 Final Exam LAW 421 Final Exam ACC 291 Final Exam . LDR 531 Final Exam MKT 571 Final Exam QNT 561 Final Exam OPS 571
Prologue: The Story of Psychology 3 Prologue: The Story of Psychology Psychology’s Roots Prescientific Psychology Psychological Science is Born Psychological Science Develops. 2 4 Prologue: The Story of Psychology Contemporary Psychology Psychology’s Big Debate .
licensing model can find more information by downloading the Windows Server 2012 R2 Licensing Guide. For foundational licensing information on topics such as assignment of licenses, storing instances, licensing running instances of the software, licensing for peak capacity, running prior versions or other editions, and details on CALs and
If you’re a volume licensing customer, the definitive guide to licensing terms and conditions is the Microsoft Licensing Product Terms and your licensing program agreement. For retail customers the license terms are specified in the Retail Software License Terms included with your product. Visual Studio 2019 Licensing Overview
Credit-based insurance scores evolved from traditional credit scores, and insurance companies began to use insurance scores in the mid-1990s. Since that time, their use has grown very rapidly. Today, all major automobile insurance companies use credit-based insurance scores in some capacity. Insurers use these scores to assign
Using Film to Teach Psychology. Films for Psychology Students. Resources for Teaching Research and Statistics in Psychology. TEACHING MATERIALS AND OTHER RESOURCES FOR PSYCHOLOGY 12.11.15 Compiled by Alida Quick, PhD Psychology 5 Developmental Psychology Teaching Resources .
