Report No. DODIG-2020-096 - Audit Of Coalition Partner .

2y ago
28 Views
2 Downloads
6.20 MB
44 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Casen Newsome
Transcription

Report No. DODIG-2020-096I nspec tor Ge ne ralU.S. Department of DefenseJUNE 24, 2020Audit of Coalition PartnerReimbursement of Dining FacilityServices at Resolute SupportHeadquarters, Kabul, AfghanistanINTEGRITY INDEPENDENCE EXCELLENCE

Results in BriefAudit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining FacilityServices at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, AfghanistanJune 24, 2020Background (cont’d)ObjectiveMultinational Logistics (MNL), U.S. Army Central (ARCENT),and Coalition partner senior national representatives. Thereare 17 Coalition partners who reimburse the DoD for thelogistics support, supplies, and services they receive, alsoreferred to as Pay-to-Play Coalition partners.The objective of this audit was to determinewhether the DoD sought full reimbursementfrom Coalition partners at Resolute SupportHeadquarters (RSHQ), Kabul, Afghanistan,for dining facility services providedunder the Logistics Civil AugmentationProgram (LOGCAP) contract.BackgroundLOGCAP is an Army program that usescontractors to provide elements of logisticssupport, supplies, and services, suchas dining facilities, to deployed forces,including Coalition partners. The DoDprovides logistics support, supplies,and services to Coalition partners on areimbursable basis under Acquisition andCross-Servicing Agreement (ACSA) authority.The DoD uses ACSAs to acquire or providelogistics support, supplies, and services inexchange for reimbursement between theUnited States and an authorized foreigncountry. An ACSA agreement establishesbasic terms, conditions, and procedures tofacilitate reciprocal provision of logisticssupport, supplies, and services. The transferof services under ACSAs is accomplishedthrough supplementary agreements, such asimplementing arrangements and ACSA orderforms, which contain additional details,terms, and conditions related to a specificacquisition of services, including diningfacility services.The main U.S. personnel and commandsresponsible for ACSA transactions for diningfacility services at RSHQ are personnelfrom U.S. Forces–Afghanistan (USFOR-A)The dining facility service transaction process begins whenthe Coalition partner senior national representative andthe ACSA coordinator agree to the terms of the ACSA orderrequest. The ACSA coordinator creates an ACSA orderform in the ACSA Global Automated Tracking and ReportingSystem (AGATRS), the system of record for managing ACSAtransactions. The ACSA order form includes the dates of thedining service, per unit cost of dining facility services, andnumber of personnel who used the services. The Coalitionpartner senior national representative and the ACSAcoordinator sign the ACSA order form, agreeing to the termsof the order form, which constitutes a binding internationalcommitment. After the service is provided, both parties signthe ACSA order form again to acknowledge receipt. The ACSAorder form is uploaded into AGATRS and forwarded toARCENT for review before submission to the Defense Financeand Accounting Service for billing and collection.FindingsWe determined that USFOR-A did not seek full reimbursementfor dining facility services provided to Coalition partnersat RSHQ through the LOGCAP contract. Specifically, for the17 Pay-to-Play Coalition partners, ACSA coordinators did not: initiate the billing of Coalition partners for 349 monthsof dining facility services between January 2016 andSeptember 2019 (53 percent of 656 months); or consistently calculate the amount owed in accordancewith USFOR-A guidance when bills were initiated.11The 656 months represents the total months all Coalition partners had personnelpresent at RSHQ and received dining facility services.DODIG-2020-096 (Project No. D2019-D000RJ-0209.000) i

Results in BriefAudit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining FacilityServices at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, AfghanistanFindings (cont’d)ACSA coordinators did not initiate bills or consistentlycalculate the amount owed in accordance with USFOR-Aguidance because the ACSA program manager didnot ensure that all bills were initiated and preparedin accordance with USFOR-A guidance or develop atraining program for ACSA coordinators that addressedprocessing of ACSA transactions in Afghanistan.In addition, the ACSA coordinators did not establish theterms and conditions, including rate and calculationmethod, with each Coalition partner before serviceswere provided.As a result of USFOR-A not initiating billing, betweenJanuary 2016 and September 2019, DoD contractorsprovided an estimated 6.3 million in dining facilityservices to Coalition partners that was never billedto Coalition partners. In addition, by not usingcorrect rates, USFOR-A underbilled Coalition partners 2.9 million. AGATRS records indicate that ACSAcoordinators initiated bills for only 4.7 million, and asof October 2019, Coalition partners had reimbursed theDoD only 880,000.Unless USFOR-A establishes terms and conditions withCoalition partners before providing services, developstraining specific to Afghanistan, and performs oversight,the DoD will continue to not initiate bills for thefull reimbursable amount for dining facility servicesprovided under the anticipated LOGCAP V contract.RecommendationsWe recommend that the USFOR-A MNL Branch Chief: develop agreements with each Coalition partnerdetailing the terms and conditions for diningfacility services at RSHQ before providing services; determine the months for which ACSA orders werenot initiated and negotiate collection with eachCoalition partner for services provided;ii DODIG-2020-096 (Project No. D2019-D000RJ-0209.000) develop and implement a process for overseeingACSA coordinators; and update the training program provided to ACSAcoordinators to include training related toproviding logistics support, supplies, and servicesin Afghanistan.We also recommend that the ARCENT MNL Branch Chiefupdate the MNL Standard Operating Procedures todefine the oversight roles and responsibilities of theACSA program manager.Management Actions TakenDuring the audit, USFOR-A MNL facilitated a seriesof meetings with Coalition partner senior nationalrepresentatives at RSHQ to agree on payment terms.These meetings have resulted in agreement on a methodfor placing, executing, and billing dining facility servicesat RSHQ. USFOR-A MNL will use a combination of actualmeal counts during the month and a daily flat rate todetermine the reimbursement amount for each month.In addition, USFOR-A has completed billing for2019 dining facility services. The ACSA programmanager, in cooperation with ARCENT, also reviewedAGATRS records to identify completed bills for 2018dining facility services. A meeting was held withCoalition partner senior national representatives onMarch 4, 2020, to discuss terms and conditions forprior year billing and 2018 bills are being distributedto Coalition partner senior national representativesfor signature. The 2017 bills will be generated anddistributed in April 2020; 2016 billing will alsobe performed.

Results in BriefAudit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining FacilityServices at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, AfghanistanManagement Actions Taken (cont’d)USFOR-A MNL has developed and implemented internalcontrols for centrally tracking ACSA orders by creating amaster listing of recurring transactions. ACSA programmanagers are providing oversight by ensuring that theserecurring transactions, such as monthly billing for RSHQdining facility services, are completed. Additionally,as part of the month-end process, the ACSA programmanager will audit records from each location forcompletion and quality.USFOR-A MNL training has been supplemented toinclude 2 weeks of boots-on-ground training inAfghanistan with the MNL ACSA program manager.A central resource is available to all staff providingspecific training and standard work aides for routineand irregular tasks, including “sell” transactions fordining facility services provided at RSHQ. An ACSA“sell” transaction occurs when DoD contractors providelogistics services to a Coalition partner nation.Management Commentsand Our ResponseThe Deputy Commanding General – Operations Chiefof Staff, U.S. Forces-Afghanistan, responding onbehalf of the USFOR-A MNL Branch Chief, providedfurther documentation of actions taken to addressthe recommendations. Specifically, the USFOR-A MNLBranch Chief: issued a memorandum to the Coalition partnersdetailing the terms and conditions agreed to at themeetings with the senior national representatives.We received the memorandum and verifiedits distribution. provided the results of the review to identifythe months for which ACSA orders were notinitiated, and the requisition numbers for thesubsequent orders. provided the results of the audits performedby the ACSA program manager for the monthsof April and May 2020. Additionally, theBranch Chief provided the master listing ofrecurring transactions used to centrally trackACSA transactions. provided the 2-week training program for ACSAcoordinators in Afghanistan. The trainingprogram includes a full overview of the roles andresponsibilities of the ACSA coordinators in “sell”transactions executed in Afghanistan.The actions taken by USFOR-A MNL Branch Chief weresufficient to close the recommendations.The ARCENT Operations Division Chief, respondingon the behalf of the U.S. Army Central MultinationalLogistics Branch Chief, agreed with our recommendationfor the ARCENT MNL Branch Chief to update the MNLStandard Operating Procedures to define the oversightroles and responsibilities of the ACSA program manager.The Division Chief stated that the Branch Chief has begunthe re-write of the MNL Standard Operating Procedures,and the changes will include weekly, monthly, andquarterly actions and reports to ensure that the ACSAprogram managers are providing oversight of theACSA coordinators. The Division Chief stated that theofficially signed MNL Standard Operating Proceduresare projected to be published by July 15, 2020. Theseactions are sufficient to resolve our recommendationto update the MNL Standard Operating Proceduresto define the oversight roles and responsibilitiesof the ACSA program manager. We will close thisrecommendation when we receive the officially signedMNL Standard Operating Procedures.Although not required to comment, the Department ofthe Army G-4/5 Plans Division Chief, responding onbehalf of the Department of the Army G-4, providedcomments on our report and recommendations. Whilenone of our recommendations required action by theDepartment of the Army G-4, they agreed with all ofour recommendations.Please see the Recommendations Table on the next pagefor the status of recommendations.DODIG-2020-096 (Project No. D2019-D000RJ-0209.000) iii

Recommendations TableManagementRecommendations Recommendations RecommendationsUnresolvedResolvedClosedU.S. Forces–Afghanistan MultinationalLogistics Branch ChiefNoneNone1.a, 1.b, 1.c, 1.dU.S. Army Central Multinational LogisticsBranch ChiefNone2NoneNote: The following categories are used to describe agency management’s comments to individual recommendations. Unresolved – Management has not agreed to implement the recommendation or has not proposed actions thatwill address the recommendation. Resolved – Management agreed to implement the recommendation or has proposed actions that will address theunderlying finding that generated the recommendation. Closed – OIG verified that the agreed upon corrective actions were implemented.iv DODIG-2020-096 (Project No. D2019-D000RJ-0209.000)

INSPECTOR GENERALDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE4800 MARK CENTER DRIVEALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, U.S. ARMY CENTRALCOMMANDER, U.S. FORCES – AFGHANISTANJune 24, 2020SUBJECT: Audit of Coalition Partner Reimbursement of Dining FacilityServices at Resolute Support Headquarters, Kabul, Afghanistan(Report No. DODIG-2020-096)This final report provides the results of the DoD Office of Inspector General’s audit.We previously provided copies of the draft report and requested written comments onthe recommendations. We considered management’s comments on the draft report whenpreparing the final report. These comments are included in the report.Of the five recommendations in our report, four recommendations are closed, and onerecommendation is resolved. As described in the Recommendations, Management Comments,and Our Response section of this report, the resolved recommendation may be closedwhen we receive documentation showing that all agreed-upon actions to implement therecommendation has been completed. Therefore, please provide us within 90 days yourresponse concerning specific actions in process or completed on the recommendation. Yourresponse should be sent to either followup@dodig.mil if unclassified or rfunet@dodig.smil.milif classified SECRET.If you have any questions, please contact me atcooperation and assistance received during the audit. We appreciate theRichard B. VasquezAssistant Inspector General for AuditReadiness and Global OperationsDODIG-2020-096 v

ContentsIntroductionObjective. 1Background . . 1Review of Internal Controls. 6Finding. USFOR-A Did Not Seek FullReimbursement for Dining Facility ServicesProvided to Coalition Partners. 7USFOR-A Did Not Seek Full Reimbursement From Coalition Partners. 8ACSA Coordinators Did Not Establish Terms and Conditions WithCoalition Partners.10ACSA Program Managers Did Not Oversee ACSA Coordinators. 11USFOR-A Did Not Develop a Training Program to Execute ACSA Transactionsin Afghanistan. . 12USFOR-A Did Not Bill 9.2 Million for Dining Facility Services at RSHQ. 13Recommendations, Management Comments and Our Response. 13AppendixesAppendix A. Scope and Methodology. . 20Use of Computer-Processed Data. 23Prior Coverage. 23Appendix B. Statistical Sample. 25Appendix C. Potential Monetary Benefit. . 27Management CommentsU.S. Forces-Afghanistan. 28U.S. Army Central. 31Department of the Army G-4. 32Acronyms and Abbreviations. . 34vi DODIG-2020-096

IntroductionIntroductionObjectiveThe objective of this audit was to determine whether the DoD sought fullreimbursement from Coalition partners at Resolute Support Headquarters (RSHQ),Kabul, Afghanistan, for dining facility services provided under the Logistics CivilAugmentation Program (LOGCAP) contract. See Appendix A for a discussion of thescope and methodology and prior audit coverage.BackgroundLogistics Civil Augmentation ProgramLOGCAP is an Army program that uses contractors to provide elements of logisticssupport, supplies, and services to deployed forces, including Coalition partners.Logistics support, supplies, and services include food, water, billeting, and baseoperations support.On July 7, 2009, Army Contracting Command–Rock Island awarded LOGCAP IV taskorder 0005, a cost‐plus‐award‐fee task order, to a contractor to provide servicesfor the Northern Afghanistan area of responsibility, which includes RSHQ, locatedin Kabul, Afghanistan. 2 Among the services provided at RSHQ under task order0005 are billeting management, vehicle maintenance, and dining facility services.By 2021, the Army is scheduled to transition to LOGCAP V, with spending capped at 82 billion over 10 years.Resolute Support MissionThe North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led Resolute Support mission is to train,advise, and assist Afghan forces and institutions to build their capacity to defendAfghanistan and protect its citizens in a sustainable manner. The Resolute Supportmission consists of approximately 17,000 personnel from 39 Coalition partnercountries, including the United States. Of these 17,000 personnel, approximately1,700 are located at RSHQ, approximately 800 of which are U.S. service members.2Army Contracting Command–Rock Island awarded a cost-plus-award-fee contract that provides payment of allowableincurred costs. The fee consists of a fixed base amount and an award amount that is based on the contractor’sperformance. Army Contracting Command–Rock Island is not involved in the process to seek reimbursements fromCoalition partners.DODIG-2020-096 1

IntroductionResolute Support Coalition PartnersCoalition partner nations supporting the Resolute Support mission are categorizedas either Pay-to-Play or Lift and Sustain Coalition partners. DoD contractorsprovide logistics support, supplies, and services to both Pay-to-Play and Liftand Sustain Coalition partners. Pay-to-Play partners reimburse the DoD for thelogistics support, supplies, and services they receive.The DoD pays for the logistics support, supplies, and services provided to Liftand Sustain Coalition partners because those partners would not be able toparticipate in the Resolute Support mission without the financial support of theUnited States. This report focuses only on Pay-to-Play Coalition partners, as theLift and Sustain Coalition partners are not required to reimburse the DoD for thesupport they receive. Table 1 outlines which Coalition partners are Pay-to-Play orLift and Sustain.Table 1. Coalition Partner Countries Categorized as Pay-to-Play or Lift and SustainPay-to-Play Coalition PartnersLift and Sustain Coalition herlandsArmeniaLithuaniaBelgiumNew govinaMontenegroFinlandPortugalBulgariaNorth h RepublicRomaniaIcelandUnited ItalyUkraineSource: The DoD OIG.Acquisition and Cross-Servicing AgreementsThe DoD uses Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements (ACSAs) to acquire orprovide logistics support, supplies, and services in exchange for reimbursementbetween the United States and an authorized foreign country. DoD Directive 2010.09defines an ACSA as a legal instrument that authorizes the reciprocal provisionof logistics support, supplies, or services. An ACSA agreement is entered intoby the DoD and a partner nation for the purpose of establishing basic terms,conditions, and procedures to facilitate reciprocal provision of logistics support,2 DODIG-2020-096

Introductionsupplies, and services. 3 The transfer of services under ACSAs is accomplishedthrough supplementary agreements, such as implementing arrangements andACSA order forms, which contain additional details, terms, and conditions relatedto a specific acquisition of services. Reimbursement for these services may takethe form of cash payments, the exchange of supplies or services of equal value, oran in-kind replacement.The ACSA Global Automated Tracking and Reporting System (AGATRS) is theDoD system of record for managing ACSA transactions. AGATRS is an unclassified,web-based system that provides a worldwide, cradle‑to‑grave automated means ofbuilding, tracking, and managing ACSA transactions. Chairman of the Joint Chiefsof Staff Instruction (CJCSI) 2120.01D requires the use of AGATRS to documenttransfer of all logistics support, supplies, and services under ACSA authorities. 4ACSA CriteriaDoD Directive 2010.09 provides policy applicable to the Office of the Secretary ofDefense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the combatant commands, andDefense agencies for the acquisition and transfer of logistics support, supplies,and services to authorized foreign governments in accordance with section 2342,title 10, United States Code. The Directive requires the Secretaries of the MilitaryDepartments to establish appropriate oversight procedures, as well as maintainfinancial and program records of all ACSA transactions. The Directive also requiresthat designated ACSA officials have experience executing ACSA transactions.U.S. Central Command serves as the DoD executive agent for ACSAs completedwithin its area of responsibility, which includes RSHQ. U.S. Central Command isresponsible for establishing policies and procedures governing the use of ACSAsfor which it is executive agent.ACSA Transaction Roles and Responsibilities for RSHQThe main personnel and commands responsible for ACSA transactions for diningfacility services at RSHQ are personnel from U.S. Forces–Afghanistan (USFOR-A)Multinational Logistics (MNL), U.S. Army Central (ARCENT), and Coalition partnersenior national representatives.3DoD Directive 2010.09, “Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements,” April 28, 2003, incorporating change 2,August 31, 2018.4Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 2120.01D, “Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreements,” May 21, 2015.DODIG-2020-096 3

IntroductionU.S. Forces–Afghanistan, Logistics Directorate,Multinational LogisticsThe USFOR-A MNL ACSA personnel are responsible for establishing terms andconditions with Coalition partners, initiating billing in AGATRS, and submittingACSA order forms to ARCENT for dining facility services at RSHQ. The USFOR-AMNL ACSA coordinator negotiates the request for support with the Coalitionpartner’s senior national representative. 5 In addition, the coordinator prepares theACSA order form, obtains required signatures, and submits signed copies of theACSA order form into AGATRS to initiate the billing process. 6The USFOR-A MNL ACSA program manager provides oversight of the execution ofACSA transactions.7 The ACSA program manager is required to appoint and trainACSA coordinators.Coalition Partner Senior National RepresentativeEach Coalition partner delegates its senior national representative in writing.Coalition partner senior national representatives are authorized by their countryto negotiate terms and conditions for support requests with the ACSA coordinator.Coalition partner senior national representatives obligate their countries, withtheir signatures, to the terms and conditions of the ACSA order form.U.S. Army CentralThe ARCENT Logistics Directorate is responsible for oversight and providingguidance and policy for the ACSA program in U.S. Central Command’s area ofresponsibility and for providing training to ACSA personnel.The ARCENT Resource Management Directorate is responsible for validating thefinancial information on the ACSA order form and entering the transaction into theResource Management Tool. 84 DODIG-2020-0965Throughout the report, the USFOR-A MNL ACSA coordinator is referred to as the ACSA coordinator. The ACSAcoordinator responsible for initiating bills for RSHQ is located at Hamid Karzai International Airport, not on-site at RSHQ.6The ACSA order form, also referred to as a Standard Form SF 1-3a, is an AGATRS-generated form to document orders oflogistics support, supplies, and services. Once the United States and the Coalition partner have agreed on terms andsigned the ACSA order form, it is considered a binding international commitment.7Throughout the report, the USFOR-A MNL ACSA program manager is referred to as the ACSA program manager.8The Resource Management Tool is the accounting system ARCENT uses to record dining facility services.

IntroductionACSA “Sell” Transaction Process for Dining Facility ServicesThe Theater-Combined Forces Land Combatant Command G4 MultinationalLogistics “Multinational Branch Standard Operating Procedures,” (the MNLStandard Operating Procedures) outline the ACSA “sell” transaction process.9An ACSA “sell” transaction occurs when DoD contractors provide logistics servicesto a Coalition partner nation. The process begins when the Coalition partnersenior national representative and the ACSA coordinator agree to the termsof the ACSA order request. The ACSA coordinator creates an ACSA order formin AGATRS. The ACSA order form is required to include the date of the order,unit price, and quantity of dining facility services provided. The MNL StandardOperating Procedures provide dining facility services as an example of serviceswhere quantity cannot be determined until the services are provided. Becausethe quantity of personnel receiving dining facility services cannot be determined,the two parties enter into an open-ended order and should establish the terms andconditions for billing.10 The Coalition partner senior national representative andthe ACSA coordinator sign the ACSA order form, agreeing to the terms outlined onthe order form.After the dining facility services are provided, both parties sign the ACSA orderform again to acknowledge the quantity of services received. The ACSA order form,containing the four signatures (two from the Coalition partner senior nationalrepresentative and two from the ACSA coordinator), is uploaded to AGATRS withsupporting documentation. Required supporting documentation includes quotesand usage data for dining facility services. The ACSA coordinator then assigns thesigned ACSA order form in AGATRS to ARCENT’s Logistics Directorate. Personnelfrom ARCENT’s Logistics Directorate are required to review the ACSA order formfor the four required signatures. After this review, ARCENT reassigns the ACSAorder form in AGATRS to ARCENT’s Resource Management Directorate for review.Personnel from ARCENT’s Resource Management Directorate review the ACSAorder form to confirm that the dollar amount matches the amount listed inAGATRS and then enter the “sell” transaction in Resource Management Tool. If thesupporting documentation does not match the information on the ACSA orderform, ARCENT Resource Management Directorate personnel return the ACSA orderto the ARCENT Logistics Directorate to obtain more information and resolve thediscrepancy. Once the discrepancy is resolved, the ARCENT Resource ManagementDirectorate provides the order information to the Defense Finance and Accounting910Theater-Combined Forces Land Combatant Command G4 Multinational Logistics “Multinational Branch StandardOperating Procedures,” May 1, 2016.An open-ended order is used when elements, such as quantity or period of time over which services are to be provided,cannot be defined in advance. Open-ended ACSA orders may be used as long as both parties understand how orderswill be billed.DODIG-2020-096 5

IntroductionService. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service creates and sends a bill tothe partner nation for payment. The Coalition partners reimburse the DoD throughan electronic fund transfer. Figure 1 outlines the “sell” transaction process fordining facility services.Figure 1. ACSA Transaction ProcessSource: The DoD OIG.Review of Internal ControlsDoD Instruction 5010.40 requires DoD organizations to implement a comprehensivesystem of internal controls that provides reasonable assurance that programsare operating as intended and to evaluate the effectiveness of the controls.11We identified internal control weaknesses within USFOR-A’s process for initiatingorders and billing for dining facility services provided under ACSA authority.Specifically, USFOR-A lacked internal controls to monitor and ensure that bills weresubmitted to Coalition partners for services they received. We will provide a copyof the report to the senior officials responsible for internal controls at USFOR-A.116 DODIG-2020-096DoD Instruction 5010.40, “Managers’ Internal Control Program Procedures,” May 30, 2013.

FindingFindingUSFOR-A Did Not Seek Full Reimbursement for DiningFacility Services Provided to Coalition PartnersWe determined that USFOR-A did not seek full reimbursement for dining facilityservices provided to Coalition partners at RSHQ through the LOGCAP contract.Spec

Jun 26, 2020 · Multinational Logistics (MNL), U.S. Army Central (ARCENT), and Coalition partner senior national representatives. There are 17 Coalition partners who reimburse the DoD for the logistics support, supplies, and services they receive, also referred to as Pay-to-Play Coalition partners. Th

Related Documents:

Feb 26, 2018 · DODIG-2018-079 (Project No. D2016-D000XD-0201.000) i Results in Brief Followup Audit: Transfer of Service Treatment Records to the Department of Veterans Affairs Objective We determined whether the DoD had implemented recommendations in DoD OIG Report No. DODIG-2014-097

DODIG-2016-004 (D2015-D000RE-0101.000) i. Results in Brief. Army Needs to Improve Contract Oversight for the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program's Task Orders. Visit us at www.dodig.mil. Objective. Our objective was to determine whether . the Army was providing sufficient contract oversight for Logistics Civil Augmentation

SUBJECT: Audit of Physical Security Controls at Department of Defense Medical Treatment Facilities (Report No. DODIG-2020-078) This final report provides the results of the DoD Office of Inspector General’s audit. We previously provided copies of the draft report and requested written comments on the recommendations.

Jul 30, 2019 · Items (Report No. DODIG -2019-106) (U) This final report provides the results of the DoD Office of Inspector General’s audit. We previously provided copies of the draft report and requested written comments on the recommendations. We considered management’s comments on the draft report

Mar 31, 2021 · 15 Department of the Navy Office of the Naval Inspector General report, “2020 Navy Voting Assistance Program Assessment,” December 17, 2020. 16 OPNAVINST 1742.1C, “Navy Voting Assistance Program,” February 5, 2016. DODIG-2021-0

90Xi3Plus, 96Xi3Plus, 140Xi3Plus, 170Xi3Plus, 220Xi3Plus Parts Catalog Outer Casing Components Item Number Description Part Number Kit Quantity 1 090, 096, 140, 170, 220 Clear Media Door Panel 46937 1 1 090, 096, 140, 170, 220 Kit Bi-Fold Clear Media Door Panel G47077M 1 2 090 & 096 Kit Media Cover 47721M 1

AND MATERIEL READINESS DIRECTOR, DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY SUBJECT: Management of Items in the Defense Logistics Agency’s Long-Term Storage Needs Improvement (Report No. DODIG-2016-036) We are providing this report for your information and use. The Defense Logistics Agency

(Report No. DODIG-2015-011) This final report is provided for information and use. We evaluated the Defense Criminal Investigative Organizations’ (DCIOs) process for reporting accurate criminal incident data to the Defense Incident-Based Reporting System (DIBRS) in accordance with DoD Directive 7730.47 and