Growth Parameters And Yield Of Groundnut As Influenced By .

2y ago
21 Views
2 Downloads
475.79 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Madison Stoltz
Transcription

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(5): 2725-2729E-ISSN: 2278-4136P-ISSN: 2349-8234JPP 2018; 7(5): 2725-2729Received: 10-07-2018Accepted: 12-08-2018R NagarajPh.D. Scholar (Agronomy),College of Agriculture, UAHS,Shivamogga, Karnataka, IndiaM HanumanthappaDean (Hort.), College ofHorticulture, Mudigere,Chickamagluru, Karnataka,IndiaSudhir KamathAssociate Professor (Agronomy),ZAHRS, Brahmavar, Udupi,Karnataka, IndiaGrowth parameters and yield of groundnut asinfluenced by integrated nutrient management atcoastal zone of KarnatakaR Nagaraj, M Hanumanthappa and Sudhir KamathAbstractA field experiment was conducted to study the of integrated nutrient management in groundnut duringRabi 2015 at Zonal Agricultural and Horticultural Research Station, Brahmavar, Udupi district,Karnataka. The results of the experiment revealed that at 80 DAS recommended nutrient practice 50per cent RDN through vermicompost applied treatment resulted in significantly higher number ofnodules (61.13) followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through poultry manure (60.37). At 90 DAS, POP 50 per cent RDN through poultry manure recorded significantly higher leaf area per plant (2089 cm2)followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost (1921 cm2) as compared to other treatments.Recommended nutrient practice 50 per cent RDN through poultry manure recorded significantly higherdry matter production (88.36, g plant-1), followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost(85.88, g plant-1). During 90 DAS to at harvest, treatments of POP 50 per cent RDN through poultrymanure recorded significantly higher values of CGR viz., 0.0057 g cm-2 day -1 and followed by POP 50per cent RDN through vermicompost (0.0056 g cm-2 day -1). Whereas, at 90 DAS to harvest higher NARvalues of 0.00239 and 0.00226 g cm-2 day -1 were registered in POP 50 per cent RDN throughvermicompost and poultry manure treatments, respectively.Keywords: Vermicompost, poultry manure, RDN, CGR, NARIntroductionIndia requires around 20.3 million tonnes of edible oil. It is essential to enhance theproductivity of prominent crops of the country like paddy, wheat, pulses and groundnutthrough location- specific nutrient management practices. To augment major food cropsproduction, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) conceptualized the idea of plantnutrients in a crop and cropping system for better resource use. It is not only a reliable way ofobtaining fairly higher yields with substantial fertilizer economy, but also a concept that isecologically sound leading to sustainable agriculture. None of the sources of nutrient alone canmeet the total plant nutrients. Integration of from chemical, organic and biological sources ofnutrients is the most efficient way to supply plant nutrients for sustained crop productivity andimproved of soil fertility (Singh and Singh, 2002) [1]. Among problematic soils, acid soils lessavailability of nutrients (N, P, Ca, S, and B) besides inadequate organic matter. Paddy andgroundnut being, exhaustive crops, removes large amount of macro and micro nutrients fromsoil. None of the sources of nutrient alone can meet the total plant nutrients. Integration offrom chemical, organic and biological sources of nutrients is the most efficient way to supplyplant nutrients for sustained crop productivity and improved of soil fertilityIt is therefore necessary to judiciously manage the inflow of organic sources of nutrients, andtheir integration with fertilizers, biofertilizers and organic manure. Application of organicmaterials along with inorganic fertilizers leads to increased productivity of the system andsustained soil health for a longer period (Gawai and Pawar, 2006) [2]. Due to escalation offertilizer prices and associated environment problem the crisis has necessitated in search foralternative sources of manures for integrated nutrient management, which includes organicmanures, biofertilizers and inclusion of legume (groundnut) to sustain the cereal basedcropping system.CorrespondenceR NagarajPh.D. Scholar (Agronomy),College of Agriculture, UAHS,Shivamogga, Karnataka, IndiaMaterials and MethodsA field experiment was conducted during rabi season of 2015 at Zonal Agricultural andHorticultural Research Station, Brahmavar, Udupi district, Karnataka, to study the ofintegrated nutrient management in groundnut. The experimental site is situated between 74 045’ to 740 46' East longitude and 130 24' 45’’ to 130 25’ 30’’ North latitude and an altitude of10 meters above mean sea level. Soil type is sandy loam in texture and pH was acidic (4.78). 2725

Journal of Pharmacognosy and PhytochemistryThe soil was medium in available nitrogen (362.84 kg ha -1),high in available phosphorus (56.28 kg ha-1) and medium inavailable potassium (113.61 kg ha-1). The organic carboncontent was high (1.32%) in range. TMV-2 a popular varietywas sown in January with a spacing of 30 cm X 10 cm inpaddy fallow. Experiment included twelve treatmentsconsisted of T1 – Package of practice (POP- FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1), T2- POP 25 per cent RDNthrough eupatorium, T3- POP 25 per cent RDN throughgliricidia, T4- POP 25 per cent RDN through vermicompost,T5- POP 25 per cent RDN through poultry manure, T 6- POP 25 per cent RDN through goat manure, T7- POP 50 percent RDN through eupatorium, T 8 - POP 50 per cent RDNthrough gliricidia, T9- POP 50 per cent RDN throughvermicompost, T10- POP 50 per cent RDN through poultrymanure, T11- POP 50 per cent RDN through goat manureand T12- Control were laid out in Randomized CompleteBlock Design (RCBD) with three replications. All organicswere applied 25 days before transplanting of paddy. Yield(biological and economical) was recorded from individualplots at harvest and converted to kg/ha. Standard statisticalmethods were used for comparing the treatment means. CGRand NAR were calculated by using the following formulas.Crop growth rate (CGR)Crop growth rate is defined as the rate of dry matterproduction per unit ground area per unit time (Watson, 1952)[3]. It was worked out by the following formula and isexpressed as g per cm2 per day.Where,W2 and W1 Dry matter per plant (g) at time t2 and t1,respectivelyS Area occupied per plant3.6.1.11 Net assimilation rate (NAR):Net assimilation rate is the rate of increase in dry weight perunit leaf area per unit time (Watson, 1952) [3] and is expressedas g per dm2 per day (g/cm2/day). It was calculated byapplying the following formula suggested by Gregory (1926) [4].Where,NAR Net assimilation rate in g per dm2 per dayL1 and W1 Leaf area in dm2 and dry weight of plant in g attime t1, respectivelyL2 and W2 Leaf area in dm2 and dry weight of plant in g attime t2, respectivelyLoge Logarithm to the base ‘e’ (Naperian constant)Results and DiscussionNodules per plantAt 80 DAS recommended nutrient practice 50 per centRDN through vermicompost applied treatment resulted insignificantly higher number of nodules (61.13) followed byPOP 50 per cent RDN through poultry manure (60.37), POP 50 per cent RDN through goat manure (59.22), POP 50per cent RDN through gliricidia (58.81) and eupatorium i.e.T7 (58.81, respectively) (Table 1). The poultry manure isrelatively a cheap source of both macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca,Mg, S) and can increase soil carbon and N content, soilporosity and enhances soil microbial activity (Thorave andDhonde, 2007) [5]. Integrated application of vermicompostwith inorganic fertilizers contributed to the better nutritionalconditions that prevailed during crop growth period whichlead to better metabolic and physiological activity of the plantand put up more growth by assimilating more amount ofnutrients. Similar results were obtained by Krishna Murthy etal. (2009) [6] and Solanki et al. (2006) [7].Leaf area and dry matter productionAt 90 DAS, POP 50 per cent RDN through poultry manurerecorded significantly higher leaf area per plant (2089 cm2)followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost(1921 cm2) as compared to other treatments and package ofpractice (1554 cm2) (Table 2). Recommended nutrientpractice 50 per cent RDN through poultry manure recordedsignificantly higher dry matter production (88.36, g plant -1),followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost(85.88, g plant-1), POP 50 per cent RDN through goatmanure (83.69 g plant-1) and POP 50 per cent RDN throughgliricidia applied treatments (79.96) (Table 3). The increase inleaf area could be attributed to increased cell division andincreased leaf expansion. More number of leaves wasrecorded due to beneficial influence of organic manureswhich release growth promoting substances along withenhancement of nitrogen availability (Araei and Mojaddam,2014). In general, the leaf area increased with the increasingof nutrient quantity and advancement of crop growth period.The highest leaf area was obtained might be due to the effectof higher or optimum nutrient added, especially nitrogen andadded extra nutrient through organic manures (Biswas, 2011)[8]. This higher dry matter accumulation may be due to higherphotosynthetic ability of the crop as reflected through higherdry matter accumulation in leaf and higher translocation ofmetabolites from leaf and stem to reproductive part duringreproductive phase of crop growth. Many research workersalso reported higher TDMP and dry matter accumulation incapsule by safflower with the addition of leguminous greenmanures (Karle et al., 2007 and Biradar, 2008) [9, 10].Crop growth rate (CGR) and net assimilation rate (NAR)During 90 DAS to at harvest, treatments of POP 50 per centRDN through poultry manure recorded significantly highervalues of CGR viz., 0.0057 g cm-2 day -1 and followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost (0.0056 g cm-2 day-1) and POP 50 per cent RDN through goat manure (0.0055g cm-2 day -1) (Table 4). Whereas, at 90 DAS to harvest higherNAR values of 0.00239 and 0.00226 g cm-2 day -1 wereregistered in POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompostand poultry manure treatments, respectively (Table 5).Combined application of organic manures had an importantrole in increasing durability of photosynthetic organs. Zalateand Padmani (2009) [11] reported increase in CGR withapplication of organic manures may be due to the accelerationof photosynthesis activity and the positive response of cropplants. NAR fairly gives a good idea of photosyntheticcapacity of the crop plant which is dependent on LAI. Araeiand Mojaddam (2014) [12] reported that increase in LAI up to60 DAS in groundnut crop was due to better nitrogen fixationand readily available of phosphorus by the application ofpoultry manure. Combined exposure of chemical fertilizer,biofertilizer and compost have significantly contributed 2726

Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistrytowards the crop morpho physiological parameters viz., LAI,CGR and NAR thus contributing towards the vegetativegrowth of the plant body (Chand et al., 2006) [13].Yield of groundnutPod yield was significantly superior in POP 50 per centRDN through poultry manure (2272 kg ha-1) followed by POP 50 per cent RDN through vermicompost (2162 kg ha -1) andPOP 50 per cent RDN through goat manure (2018 kg ha -1).The former treatment (T10), followed by POP 50 per centRDN through vermicompost POP 50 per cent RDN throughgoat manure and POP 50 per cent RDN through gliricidiaresulted in significantly higher haulm yield (2900, 2771, 2653and 2598 kg ha-1, respectively) (Table 6). Higher economicaland biological yields in poultry manure might be due toammonium-N (NH4-N) is a significant part of total N inpoultry manure, which additionally contains uric acid. Uricacid metabolizes rapidly to NH4-N in most soils, and the netresult of the high NH4-N and uric acid contents in poultrywaste is that a large percentage of N can be converted tonitrate-N (NO3-N) within a few weeks. Poultry manureimproves the number of pods per plant, pod yield and haulmyield in groundnut (Veeramani et al., 2012) [14]. Applicationof vermicompost and FYM might have provided sufficientand balanced nutrients in readily available from throughoutthe growth period of the crop and the increased availability ofplant nutrients, their uptake leading to the greaterphotosynthesis production of metabolites and enzymaticactivities which might have influenced into increasednodulation and extensive root system and the greaterproduction of metabolites and their translocation to varioussinks especially the productive strictures (pods and seeds)could have helped to increase into the number of pods perplant besides increasing the overall growth. Results of thepresent investigation were in similar line with those ofSharma et al. (2005) [15]. Further, application of goat manureincreased concentrations of labile inorganic P fractions (resinP and NaHCO3 P) following the application of goat manureindicated that net mineralization of P occurred, possiblybecause the goat manure contained 2.4 g P kg-1, which wasgreater than the critical P content of 2 g kg-1 reported byFloate (1970) [16] as necessary for plant material to mineralize P.Table 1: Number of nodules per plant at different growth stages of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient management.TreatmentsT1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P 2O5:K2O ha-1)T2 - POP 25% RDN through eupatoriumT3 - POP 25% RDN through gliricidiaT4 - POP 25% RDN through vermicompostT5 - POP 25% RDN through poultry manureT6 - POP 25% RDN through goat manureT7 - POP 50% RDN through eupatoriumT8 - POP 50% RDN through gliricidiaT9 - POP 50% RDN through vermicompostT10 -POP 50% RDN through poultry manureT11 -POP 50% RDN through goat manureT12 – ControlS. Em CD (P 0.05)40 .2140.2812.811.805.3060 .9654.3031.632.376.9680 .3759.2233.453.058.98At 3043.7740.5014.042.246.59Table 2: Leaf area (cm2 plant-1) at different growth stages of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient managementTreatmentsT1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P 2O5:K2O ha-1)T2 - POP 25% RDN through eupatoriumT3 - POP 25% RDN through gliricidiaT4 - POP 25% RDN through vermicompostT5 - POP 25% RDN through poultry manureT6 - POP 25% RDN through goat manureT7 - POP 50% RDN through eupatoriumT8 - POP 50% RDN through gliricidiaT9 - POP 50% RDN through vermicompostT10 -POP 50% RDN through poultry manureT11 -POP 50% RDN through goat manureT12 - ControlS. Em CD (P 0.05)30 DAS26127127528028828729829229130831125610.7532.060 91.2726990 106.54314At 25Table 3: Total dry matter production (g plant-1) at different growth stages of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient management.TreatmentsT1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P 2O5:K2O ha-1)T2 - POP 25% RDN through eupatoriumT3 - POP 25% RDN through gliricidiaT4 - POP 25% RDN through vermicompostT5 - POP 25% RDN through poultry manureT6 - POP 25% RDN through goat manureT7 - POP 50% RDN through eupatoriumT8 - POP 50% RDN through gliricidia 2727 30 DAS5.414.905.205.245.025.325.605.3860 DAS23.1824.5926.9528.3829.2226.1931.0831.8490 DAS36.1437.8439.1841.6142.2640.5244.0245.58At harvest61.7064.3967.2871.7673.7469.1176.1879.96

Journal of Pharmacognosy and PhytochemistryT9 - POP 50% RDN through vermicompostT10 -POP 50% RDN through poultry manureT11 -POP 50% RDN through goat manureT12 - ControlS. Em CD (P 9.175.7116.25Table 4: Crop growth rate (g cm-2 day-1) at different growth stages of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient managementTreatmentsT1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P 2O5:K2O ha-1)T2 - POP 25% RDN through eupatoriumT3 - POP 25% RDN through gliricidiaT4 - POP 25% RDN through vermicompostT5 - POP 25% RDN through poultry manureT6 - POP 25% RDN through goat manureT7 - POP 50% RDN through eupatoriumT8 - POP 50% RDN through gliricidiaT9 - POP 50% RDN through vermicompostT10 -POP 50% RDN through poultry manureT11 -POP 50% RDN through goat manureT12 – ControlS. Em CD (P 0.05)30-60 60.00270.00280.00270.00110.00020.000660-90 290.001370.001550.001540.001410.000900.0002NS90 DAS-at .00520.00560.00570.00550.00230.00060.0016Table 5: Net assimilation rate (g cm-2 day-1) at different growth stages of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient managementTreatmentsT1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1)T2 - POP 25% RDN through eupatoriumT3 - POP 25% RDN through gliricidiaT4 - POP 25% RDN through vermicompostT5 - POP 25% RDN through poultry manureT6 - POP 25% RDN through goat manureT7 - POP 50% RDN through eupatoriumT8 - POP 50% RDN through gliricidiaT9 - POP 50% RDN through vermicompostT10 -POP 50% RDN through poultry manureT11 -POP 50% RDN through goat manureT12 - ControlS. Em CD (P 0.05)30-60 .00004NS60-90 .0001NS90 DAS-at able 6: Pod yield, kernel yield, haulm yield and harvest index of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient managementTreatmentsPod yield (kg ha-1) Kernel yield (kg ha-1) Haulm yield (kg ha-1) Harvest index-1T1 – POP (FYM 10 t 25:50:25 kg N:P 2O5:K2O ha )1725116322230.439T2 - POP 25% N through eupatorium1683119922620.426T3 - POP 25% N through gliricidia1732121423450.424T4 - POP 25% N through vermicompost1809126924560.424T5 - POP 25% N through poultry manure1913134125010.434T6 - POP 25% N through goat manure1821126223670.436T7 - POP 50% N through eupatorium1832132524350.428T8 - POP 50% N through gliricidia1932136625980.427T9 - POP 50% N through vermicompost2162157427710.438T10 -POP 50% N through poultry manure2272166529000.439T11 -POP 50% N through goat manure2018145826530.432T12 - Control81031911950.405S. Em 105.1290.89123.340.019CD (P 0.05)308267362NSReferences1. Singh B, Singh Y. Concepts in nutrient management. In:Recent Advances in Agronomy. Indian Soc. Agron., NewDelhi. 2002, 92-109.2. Gawai PP, Pawar VP. Integrated nutrient management insorghum (Sorghum bicolor)-chickpea (Cicer arietinum)cropping sequence under irrigated conditions. Indian JAgron. 2006; 51:17-20.3.4.5. 2728 Watson DJ. The physiological basis for variation in yield.Advances in Agronomy. 1952; 14:101-146.Gregory FG. The effect of climatic condition on thegrowth of barley. Annuals of Botany. 1926; 40:1-26.Thorave DS, Dhonde MB. Morphological indices andyield attributes as influenced by integrated nutrientmanagement in summer groundnut. Annals of PlantPhysiol. 2007; 21(2):186-188.

Journal of Pharmacognosy and a Murthy R, Vasudev HS, Devagiri GM,Umashankar N, Raveendra HR. Effect of integratednutrient management of growth and yield parameters andnutrient uptake of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). MysoreJ Agric. Sci. 2009; 43(4):696-699.Solanki RM, Bhalu VB, Jadav KV. Organic farmingapproach for sustaining productivity of rainfedgroundnut. Ann. Agric. Res. New Series. 2006;27(3):236-239.Biswas SK. Effect of irrigation with municipal wastewater on wheat and potato cultivation. Ph D Dissertation.Department of Irrigation and Water Management,Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh,Banglades. 2011, 217.Karle AS, Dhoble MV, Jadhav GS, Shelke DK.Integrated nutrient management for greengram (Vignaradiata)-safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) croppingsystems under rainfed condition. J Oilseed Res. 2007;24(1):133-135.Biradar SA. In-situ green manuring of intercroppedlegumes on the performance of maize –chickpea /safflower cropping system under rainfed condition. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Univ. Agric. Sci., Dharwad, Karnataka(India), 2008.Zalate PY, Padmani DR. Effect of organic manure andbio-fertilizers on growth, yield attributes and economicson kharif groundnut (Arachis hypogaea, L). GAU Res. J.2009; 34(2):106-108.Araei M, Mojaddam M. The effect of different levels ofphosphorus from triple super phosphate chemicalfertilizers, organic manures and biological phosphatefertilizer on yield components of corn. InternationalJournal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences.2014; 4(2):625-632.Chand S, Anwar M, Patra DD. Influence of long-termapplication of organic and inorganic fertilizer to build upsoil fertility and nutrient uptake in mint-mustard croppingsequence. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2006; 37:63-76.Veeramani P, Subrahmaniyan K, Ganesaraja V. Organicmanure management on groundnut; A review.Wudpecker J Agric. Res. 2012; 1(7):238-243.Sharma S, Dubey, Kaisthy BP, Verma TS. Effect orrhizobia inoculation and phosphorus levels on symbioticparameters, growth and yield of french bean in NorthWest Himalayan acid Alfisol. Legumes Res. 2005;28:103-106.Floate MJS. Decomposition of organic materials fromhill soils and pastures. II. Comparative studies on themineralization of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus fromsoil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1970; 2:173-194 2729

R Nagaraj Ph.D. Scholar (Agronomy), College of Agriculture, UAHS, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India Growth parameters and yield of groundnut as influenced by integrated nutrient management at R Nagaraj, M Hanumanthappa and Sudhir Kamath Abstract A field experiment was conducted to study

Related Documents:

Small Grains and Grain Sorghum 39 their straw yield as much as on grain yield. In a study we did at DeKalb, we found that straw yield was affected both by plant height and by yield. The formula to predict straw yield based on height and grain yield was as follows: Straw yield (tons per acre) 0.018 grain yield

(2) Yield - Yield (current yield) is a bond's annual return on its annual coupon payments and current market price. (1) Book Yield - Book yield (purchase yield) is the rate that all future cash flows discounted to the book value.

Figure 3 Leveraged Loan Yield vs High Yield Bond Yield January 1992 - December 2012 Source: Credit Suisse 5 8 11 14 17 20 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Y ield (%) Correlation 0.88 HY Yield-to-Worst CS Lev Loan Index Yield (Assumes 3-yr Re ) 12/31/12 6.25% 5.93% Figure 4 Cumulative Returns of Bonds, Loans and Equities

semi-arid tropics. However, there is little information about yield gaps and production con-straints. This study aimed at analysing existing yield gaps and exploring major constraints of sorghum production in Southwest Ethiopia. A crop simulation model approach using AquaCrop and DSSAT was used to estimate potential yield and analyse the yield .

management caused a significant loss in yield and quality. Nevertheless, 18.04 t ha-1 dry matter yield with 24.05 % CP content was recorded at seasonal deficit water management. P fertilization increased the yield and forage quality. The yield was the highest (20.23 t ha-1) at the rate of 90 kg ha-1 P fertilizer, but yield and forage quality

P C rs M rs CDMD d t t t T T T tT t T 1 11 1 x x (4.1) where rst is the spot or zero-coupon yield on a bond with t years to maturity Dt 1/(1 rst) t the corresponding discount factor In 4.1, rs1 is the current one-year spot yield, rs2 the current two-year spot yield, and so on. Theoretically the spot yield f

Meanwhile, the median high-yield EDF metric increased from January 17's 0.30% to March 11's 0.94%. The latter is the highest median high-yield EDF since the 0.95% of February 11, 2016. Despite February 11, 2016's very wide 899 bp high-yield bond spread, March 11's median high-yield EDF favors a narrower 594

critical growth stages, determine the effect of sowing date on yield and yield components of two wheat culti- vars to enable the farmers to know the optimum sowing date for the newly introduced cultivars and determine the most suitable wheat cultivar for farmers in Sokoto and othe