Criminal Court Of The City Of New York Annual Report

2y ago
19 Views
2 Downloads
7.36 MB
58 Pages
Last View : 22d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Ryan Jay
Transcription

Criminal Courtof theCity of New YorkAnnual Report2017Hon. Tamiko AmakerAdministrative JudgeJustin A. BarryChief Clerk

CRIMINAL COURT OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK2017 ANNUAL REPORTPublished October 2018This Report was published by the Office of the Chief Clerk of New York City Criminal Court.EditorJustin Barry, Esq.WriterLisa Lindsay, Esq.ContributorsTara BegleyDarren EdwardsCarolyn CadoretTABLE OF CONTENTSPageINTRODUCTIONWelcome—Administrative Judge Tamiko Amaker4Introduction—Chief Clerk Justin Barry5New York City Criminal Court Judges6Calendar Year 2017—Executive Summary7NYC Criminal Court 2017 By the Numbers7Courthouse Locations8NYC Criminal Court Jurisdiction9Organizational Structure of NYC Criminal Court10Criminal Court Caseload—A 10 Year Overview11COURT OPERATIONSSummary InformationCombined Filings13Calendared Cases14Dockets Pending15Dispositions17ArraignmentsArraignment Parts18Arraignment Sessions19Arrest to Arraignment—The Process20DAT/Online Arraignments21Arraignments—Types of Charges242 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report

PageArrest to Arraignment - Flowchart27Arraignment Dispositions28Most Frequently Charged Offenses At Arraignment29Citywide Summons Operation31Summonses - Revenue31Summonses - From Ticket to Hearing32Summonses - Filings, Docketing and Arraignment33Summonses - Trials34Most Frequently Charged Summons Offenses 201735Plea By Mail36Pre Trial/All Purpose Parts37Felony Waiver Parts42Domestic Violence Courts47Trial Parts48Trial Verdicts48Pretrial Hearings51Community Courts53Red Hook Community Justice Center53Midtown Community Court53Central Administration55Criminal Court Revenue56Criminal Court Disbursements57This report discusses online arrest/Desk Appearance Ticket (DAT) andsummons arraignments and filings. Online arrest/DAT refers to thosecases that are filed with the court subsequent to an arrest by a law enforcement officer and the filing of a formal complaint. With online arrest/DAT cases, the defendant is typically detained either at a local police precinct or central booking while fingerprints are taken and a criminal history report returned. Online arrest defendants are held until seenby a judge. DAT defendants are released after printing, at the discretionof law enforcement, and given a notice to appear in court on a futuredate. Unless indicated, this report groups these two types of cases to-gether into one category.Summons cases are started when a law enforcement officer issues anappearance ticket to a defendant with instructions to report to court ona certain date. Typically, the defendant is not detained prior to releaseand no fingerprints are taken. A complaint is then filed with the CriminalCourt to commence the case.3

Welcome — Administrative Judge Tamiko AmakerI am delighted to welcome you to the 2017 NewYork City Criminal Court Annual Report. Since taking on the role of Administrative Judge on January1, 2018, this is the first time I have the pleasure ofintroducing our readers to this comprehensive record of the work of our Court.Since it was first published in 2004, the goal of thereport has been to showcase the work of this verybusy Court. While the numbers can be interestingin and of themselves, it is sometimes easy to forget why we compile this data every year.Behind every number in this report is a defendantawaiting a trial or disposition on his case; a victimof a crime coordinating with a prosecutor; witnesses being interviewed by police officers, prosecutors or defense lawyers; and family members waiting for news of a case.It is how we use this data that is the most important part of the work behind this report. Courtmanagers use these numbers to allocate resources,ensure the Court is running efficiently and makeadjustments, when it is not. These decisions candirectly impact defendants, victims, witnesses andfamily members.Just as importantly, members of the public andmedia can view this data to get insight into howthe people’s courthouses are functioning.What the data narrative does not necessarily showare the strategies, policies, innovations and, mostimportantly, the incredible work of our judges andstaff that drive data trends contained in this report.Our judges and staff have dramatically increasedtrial capacity in every county of the City and, inturn, reduced the time that it takes to dispensejustice on each case. We have done this by movingstaff and judges from county to county to createtargeted trial or “blockbuster” weeks in thosecounties that historically have had fewer trialparts. The result has had a positive impact on everyone affected by a criminal case—victims, defendants, witnesses, law enforcement and lawyersalike.Our Procedural Justice Initiative in Manhattanseeks to improve the experience of everyone usingthat busy courthouse by improving signs throughout the courthouse to help users navigate thespace better; improve communication betweenjudges, court staff and defendants; give defendants more information on how the process worksand what is expected of them; and ultimately improve compliance with court directives.4 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual ReportHon. Tamiko AmakerAdministrative JudgeNew York City Criminal CourtWe have reduced obstacles to bail by increasingthe availability of credit card bail by removing administrative caps and assisting in the creation of anonline bail payment system. We have furtherstreamlined the use of surety and appearancebonds that do not require the payment of premiums. Our judges’ use of supervised release, whichdoes not require the defendant to post any bail,continues to grow.It is with the backdrop of the incredible work ofour judges and staff, and their willingness to trynew and promising strategies to improve case management and outcomes, with which I think you canbest view the information in this report and get afull picture of the work of this great Court.- Tamiko Amaker

Introduction — Chief Clerk Justin BarryThe Excellence Initiative remained center stage in2017. Chief Judge Janet DiFiore’s comprehensiveprogram focusing on core processes and procedures was in its second year and Criminal Courtcontinued to focus on reducing delays and bringingcases to timely resolution. In the last year of Hon.Melissa Jackson’s tenure as Administrative Judge,the Court made significant strides reducing caseloads and the time that it takes to bring cases tofinal disposition.Judges and staff worked tirelessly to increase trialcapacity, reorganize case processing and prioritizeresources in an all out effort to bring cases to faster resolution. Highlighted below are just some ofthe statistics that bear out these successes.From the end of 2016 to the end of 2017: In Bronx County pending caseload dropped from8,526 to 7,824; cases over six months dropped by24% from 2,965 to 2,250; and cases over one yeardropped 51% from 1,425 to 700. In New York County pending caseload droppedfrom 9,167 to 7,736; cases over six monthsdropped 40% from 1,923 to 1,148; and cases overone year dropped 58% from 392 to 164. In Kings County pending caseloads dropped from11,333 to 10,391; cases over six months dropped20% from 2,184 to 1,728; and cases over one yeardropped 9% from 247 to 224.To be sure, there is more to be done and our newAdministrative Judge Tamiko Amaker has taken upthe challenge. Developing a series of continuing“blockbuster” weeks in Queens and Richmond,Judge Amaker is committed to further reducingcaseloads and older cases in those two counties.During these weeks, the Court reassigns judgesand staff to these counties to increase trial capacity. The oldest cases are placed on the“blockbuster” calendar and, after a last attemptto fashion a disposition, they are sent to trial.From January to May 2018: In Queens County pending cases dropped from8,379 to 7,264; cases over six months dropped23% from 1,679 to 1,354; and cases over one yeardropped 39% from 358 to 246. In Richmond County pending cases dropped from2,385 to 1,879; cases pending over six monthsdropped 34% from 605 to 401; and cases over oneyear remained steady from 72 to 75.Justin BarryChief Clerk VIINew York City Criminal Court Providing a financial advisor in arraignments toassess defendants’ financial condition and advisethe Court and defense counsel on defendants’ability to pay bail or bond; Creation with the City of an online bail paymentsystem; Planning for implementation of Raise the Age legislation in October 2018 raising the age of criminal responsibility; and Roll out of Overdose Avoidance and Recovery(OAR) parts to address the City’s burgeoning opioid crisis.Criminal Court is committed to improving its basicfunctions and staying current with the latest trendsin criminal justice.- Justin BarryThe Court remains on the cutting edge of criminaljustice reform, piloting new programs, including:5

6 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual ReportHon. Eugene GuarinoHon. Danielle HartmanHon. Phyllis ChuHon. Abena DarkehHon. Curtis FarberHon. Herbert MosesHon. Kathryn PaekHon. Laurie PetersonHon. Steven StatsingerHon. Joanne WattersHon. Michael GaryHon. Laura JohnsonHon. Michael KitsisHon. Donald LeoHon. Kim PetersenHon. Jane TullyHon. Elizabeth WarinHon. Bahaati PittHon. Cori WestonHon. Lyle FrankHon. David FreyHon. Josh HanshaftHon. Joseph McCormackHon. Rosemarie MontalbanoHon. Christopher RoblesHon. Craig WalkerHon. Carolyn Walker-DialloHon. Tara CollinsHon. Patsy GouldborneHon. Marsha MichaelHon. Bianka PerezHon. Jeffrey RosenbluethHon. Julio Rodriguez IIIMidtown Community CourtHon. Charlotte DavidsonHon. Alex CalabreseHon. Ann ScherzerHon. Sharen HudsonHon. Steven HornsteinRed Hook CJCHon. Stephen AntignaniHon. Frederick ArriagaHon. Harold AdlerHon. Linda Poust LopezActing Sup. Court JusticesActing Sup. Court JusticesActing Sup. Court JusticesHon. Frances WangHon. Myrna SocorroHon. Scott DunnHon. Lorna McAllisterHon. Beth BellerHon. Judy KimHon. Jerry IanneceHon. Anglea BadamoHon. Rachel FreierHon. Mary BejaranoHon. John ZollHon. Toko SeritaHon. Suzanne MelendezHon. Bruna DiBiaseActing Sup. Court JusticesHon. Ushir Pandit-DurantCivil Court JudgesCivil Court JudgesCivil Court JudgesCivil Court JudgesHon. Gia Morris-KernHon. Karen GopeeHon. Althea DrysdaleHon. Keshia EspinalHon. Heidi CesareHon. Margaret MartinHon. Toni CiminoHon. Gerianne AbrianoHon. Marguerite DoughertyHon. David KirschnerHon. Claudia Daniels-DePeysterHon. Laurence BuschingQUEENSHon. Michelle ArmstrongSupervising JudgeCriminal Court JudgesKINGSHon. Michael YavinskySupervising JudgeCriminal Court JudgesBRONXHon. George A. GrassoSupervising JudgeCriminal Court JudgesNEW YORKHon. Tamiko AmakerSupervising JudgeCriminal Court JudgesHon. Melissa C. Jackson, Administrative JudgeHon. Alexander Jeong, Deputy Administrative Judge2017 New York City Criminal CourtNote: The Administrative Judge, theDeputy Administrative Judge and theSupervising Judges are Acting Sup.Court Justices too.Hon. Raymond RodriguezHon. Raja RajeswariRICHMONDHon. Alan MeyerSupervising JudgeCriminal Court Judges

Calendar Year 2017 - Executive SummaryThis report profiles the work and accomplishmentsof the Criminal Court of the City of New York in2017. The report is divided into two sections; thefirst part is an introduction and summary of theorganizational structure of the Court and the second part describes court operations - a summary ofthe Court’s work, arraignments, all purpose parts,trial parts, community courts and other specializedcourtrooms, along with a description of the Court’sback office. This report explains how each courtoperation functions and then provides a quantitative analysis of the work in an effort to give thereader a snapshot of the volume and outcomes.From November 2004 through October 2012, theBronx Criminal Division had administrative responsibility over many aspects of misdemeanor caseprocessing in the Bronx. For the most part this report does not address statistical information relating to Bronx misdemeanor operations during thisperiod, since most non-arraignment Criminal Courtfunctions were handled in the Bronx SupremeCourt Criminal Division until October 2012. Thereare exceptions, however. We do report on summons, arraignment statistics and revenue numbersin the Bronx during that period as part of the entire Criminal Court picture. Due to the fact All Purpose and Trial Part case processing returned toCriminal Court in the Bronx toward the end of2012, many of the Bronx statistics appear incomplete, e.g. number of calendared cases or numberof trials. In many instances these 2012 numbersare incomplete because the numbers are attributed statistically to the Bronx Criminal Division untilOctober 8, 2012 and the Criminal Court for therest of the year.Here are some 2017 Criminal Court milestones : 19.00 hours average arrest-to-arraignment time; 253,275 online arrest/DAT arraignments; 193,834 summons filings; 259,016 online arrest/DAT dispositions; 1,028,910 cases calendared; 624,142 cases calendared in all purpose parts; 19,334 total dispositions in Criminal Court felonywaiver parts; 913 pretrial hearings commenced*; 1,081 trials commenced (combined arrest/DATand summons); 31,607,388 in revenue; and 138,985,010 operating budget.NYC Criminal Court 2017 By the NumbersBudget:Total revenue:Fine revenue:Summons revenue:Bail revenue:Summons filings::Felony filings:Jurors serving:Non-judicial personnel: 138,985,010 31,607,388 16,717,982 11,495,705 ings commenced:Trials verdicts (arrest cases):TrialsCourt officers:Clerks:Judges authorized by statute:Judges actually sitting:Court Reporters:Court Interpreters:Court 0*Year 2017 does not include Queens County. Hearing data for Queens County are not available in UCMS.7

Courthouse Locations Bronx Criminal Court215 E.161st Street, Bronx, NY 10451265 E.161st Street, Bronx, NY 10451 Queens Criminal Court125-01 Queens Blvd., Kew Gardens, NY 11415 Queens Summons120-55 Queens Blvd., Kew Gardens, NY 11415 Midtown Community Court314 W. 54th Street, New York, NY 10019 New York Criminal Court100 Centre Street, New York, NY 10013 Citywide Summons1 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 Kings Criminal Court120 Schermerhorn Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201 Red Hook Community Justice Center88-94 Visitation Place, Brooklyn, NY 11231 Richmond Criminal Court26 Central Ave, Staten Island, NY 10301NEW YORK CITYBRONXNEW n Island)Citywide SummonsBrooklynManhattanQueensQueens Summons8 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual ReportBronxStaten IslandRed HookMidtown

NYC Criminal Court JurisdictionNew York City Criminal Court is a court of citywidejurisdiction. As of December 31, 2017, CriminalCourt administration assigned seventy-six judges topreside over cases in six main courthouses, twocommunity courthouses, a citywide summons operation in Manhattan, and a summons operation inthe Queens Borough Hall.Criminal Court has preliminary jurisdiction over allarrests processed in the five counties of New YorkCity by state and local law enforcement agencies.Criminal Court arraigns the vast majority of felony,misdemeanor and petty offense cases in the city.MisdemeanorsCriminal Court has trial jurisdiction over all misdemeanor cases not prosecuted by indictment andadjudicates these cases from the initial court appearance until final disposition. Criminal Courthandles all aspects of the hundreds of thousands ofmisdemeanor cases filed each year including arraignment, trial readiness, motion practice, pretrial hearing and trial. The vast majority of misdemeanor cases are disposed by guilty plea, otherdisposition or dismissal but the Court presides overfour to seven hundred trials each year.SummonsesCases initiated by a summons make up a large portion of the cases heard in Criminal Court. Summonses are typically issued by police officers forminor Penal Law violations or by peace officers/enforcement agents (and, again, police officers)whose duties mandate enforcement of the locallaws (e.g., the NYC Administrative Code). Criminal Court has trial jurisdiction over summons matters, hearing these cases from arraignment to trialor final disposition.FeloniesCriminal Court has preliminary jurisdiction overfelony cases. Felonies are typically arraigned inCriminal Court. Cases are usually adjourned to aFelony Waiver Part to await the decision of theGrand Jury on whether the defendant should standtrial on the felony charges. Felony cases aretransferred to Supreme Court after a grand juryvotes an indictment.While Criminal Court does not have jurisdiction tohear trials on felony matters, a large number offinal dispositions on felonies are adjudicated byCriminal Court judges sitting in Felony WaiverParts. (These judges are designated by administrative orders to sit as Acting Justices of the SupremeCourt). These parts act as both Criminal Court andSupreme Court Parts, allowing prosecutor and defense counsel to agree in certain cases to waivepresentation to the Grand Jury and instead prosecute the case with a Superior Court Information(SCI).9

10 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report

Organizational Structure of NYC Criminal CourtBy statute, Criminal Court has 107 authorizedjudgeships. Each Criminal Court judge must be aresident of New York City. The judges are appointed for terms of ten years by the Mayor of the Cityof New York. Any vacancies which occur prior tothe expiration of a term also are filled through appointment by the Mayor.Many of the 107 judges appointed to the CriminalCourt have been assigned to the Criminal Term ofthe Supreme Court in order to handle felony cases.To assist in processing Criminal Court cases, courtadministrators have assigned to the Criminal Court,New York City Civil Court Judges and, on occasion,a Judge of the New York City Family Court. Alljudges presiding over a Criminal Court part on December 31, 2017 are listed on page six.(Kings), Arlethia Howard (New York), Carey Wone(Queens) and Ada Molina (Richmond). The citywidesummons operation was supervised by Antonio Diazand Andrew Hassell and William Graf oversaw operations at Midtown Community Court and RedHook Criminal Justice Center, respectively. In addition Mr. Hassell supervised Community Court operations in Red Hook and Midtown as CitywideCommunity Court Coordinator.Central Administration staff also included LisaLindsay (problem solving courts); Davon Culley(personnel), who oversees the Criminal Court Human Resources Department; Melissa Douglas (dataentry); Rene Medina (interpreters); Gary Patella(cashiering); and Marilyn Melendez (court reporters).In 2017, the Court was headed by a citywide Administrative Judge, Hon. Melissa C. Jackson, whowas responsible for the overall operation of theCourt. Judge Jackson was assisted in this task bythe Deputy Administrative Judge Alexander Jeongand by five supervising judges: one for the Bronx —Hon. George A. Grasso; one for Kings — Hon. Michael Yavinsky; one for New York — Hon. TamikoAmaker; one for Queens—Hon. Michelle Armstrong;and one for Richmond— Hon. Alan Meyer.Under the direction of the Administrative Judge,the Chief Clerk oversees the Court's staff of nonjudicial personnel. In 2017, Chief Clerk Justin Barrywas assisted in this task by the First Deputy ChiefClerk for citywide operations, Antonio Diaz. In addition, the Chief Clerk was supported by five Borough Chief Clerks who, along with the supervisingjudges, oversaw the day-to-day operations in eachcounty– William Kalish (Bronx), Kenneth FayCriminal Court Caseload — A 10 Year OverviewThe total number of online arrest/DAT arraignments decreased by 10.0% from 2016 to 2017,29.1% lower than those seen in 2012 and over29.3% less than 2007. DAT arraignments citywidehave decreased over 18.7% from 2012.Although New York City law enforcement continues its focus on “quality of life” crimes, summonsfilings decreased by 34.6% from 2016 to 2017.Petty offenses, which include misdemeanors, violations, infractions and other low level online arrest/DAT arraignments, decreased with numbers10.2% lower than 2016, 31.3% lower than thoseseen in2012, and 28.7% lower than those seen in 2007.Felony arraignments decreased less significantly—8.9% lower than the previous year and 15.8% lowerthan 2012.Criminal Court calendared 1,028,910 online/DATcases in 2017, more than the 1,003,128 calendaredin 2016. The Court saw a 4.8% decrease in pendingonline/DAT caseloads.In 2017, the Court brought 259,016 cases to finaldisposition, a number 9.7% lower than the previousyear.11

New York City Criminal Court Supervising JudgesHonorable George A. GrassoBronx CountyHonorable Michael YavinskyKings CountyHonorable Michelle ArmstrongQueens County12 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual ReportHonorable Tamiko AmakerNew York CountyHonorable Alan MeyerRichmond County

COURT OPERATIONS — SUMMARY INFORMATIONCourt Operations — Summary Information13

COURT OPERATIONS — SUMMARY INFORMATIONNumber of Calendared CasesCitywideBronx*KingsNew 007973,765399,345281,697242,09150,632*Year 2012 includes Bronx County data for October 2012 to December 2012.14 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report

COURT OPERATIONS — SUMMARY INFORMATIONDockets Pending on December 31 (Snapshot of Pending Cases)2017CitywideBronxKingsNew 8313,445Total Pending 352Total55,29711,20716,01612,93411,7723,368Total Pending ,8458,64011,7659,2837,8672,290Total Pending Sentence2016Total Pending SentenceTotal2015Total Pending 42215,15814,019 66Total Pending DispositionTotal Pending DispositionTotal Pending SentenceTotalTotal Pending 33,76413,44811,6246,1782,514Total Pending SentenceTotalTotal Pending DispositionFelonyMisd/Inf/Viol/OthTotal Pending 123Total Pending onyTotal Pending Sentence20144,39459,391TotalTotal Pending DispositionFelonyMisd/Inf/Viol/OthTotal Pending 7915

COURT OPERATIONS — SUMMARY INFORMATIONDockets Pending on December 31 (Snapshot of Pending Cases)Citywide2009KingsNew d/Inf/Viol/Oth35,26313,13513,2916,5062,331Total Pending 7,1752,170Total Pending 26,0551,636Total Pending Sentence2,7349974081,050279TotalTotal Pending DispositionFelonyTotal2008Total Pending DispositionTotal2007Total Pending DispositionBronx16 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report

COURT OPERATIONS — SUMMARY INFORMATIONCitywide DispositionsTotalGuilty 67543,73313,2654,16111,256* Dispositions in the “Other” category include resolutions of Criminal Court warrants outstanding in another county; resolutions ofFamily Court warrants and Orders of Protection outstanding; removals to Family Court; extradition matters; and transfers to anothercourt.17

COURT OPERATIONS — ARRAIGNMENTSThe arraignment marks the first time that a criminal defendant appears in court. Arraignment Partsof Criminal Court operate day and night, every dayof the year in all New York City. In 2017, 253,275cases were arraigned citywide on Online arrest orDesk Appearance Ticket (DAT) cases.Arraignments are the final stage of the arrest process in New York City. Before the defendant appears before the Judge, a complicated series ofsteps must occur, all typically within a twenty-fourhour period. The flowchart on page 27 shows all ofthe necessary steps that must occur between a defendant’s arrest and the time that he or she firstappears in court. The defendant must be broughtto Central Booking where his or her arrest photoand fingerprints are taken. The fingerprints areelectronically sent to the Division of CriminalJustice Services (DCJS) where a criminal history orrap sheet is produced and returned to the police inCentral Booking. Meanwhile the Criminal JusticeAgency (CJA) interviews each defendant for thepurpose of making a bail recommendation and thearresting officer meets with an Assistant DistrictAttorney in order to draft the complaint that willstart the criminal prosecution. All of these items complaint, rap sheet and CJA report - must becompiled before the court may arraign the defendant. Once compiled, the paperwork are deliveredto court arraignment clerks who prepare a finalfile for the court and attorneys, assign a docketnumber to the case and initialize the case in thecourt’s computer system. Defense counsel - eitherassigned or private - is then given an opportunityto interview the defendant before he or she seesthe judge.Number of Weekly Arraignment Parts - 2017Arraignment PartsCitywide*BronxKingsMidtownNew YorkQueensRed eekend Day4.5*1.01.00.01.01.00.00.5*Weekend Night5.41.01.80.01.61.00.00.0* Some arraignment parts are listed as a fraction. In Queens, the arraignment part that is only opened one day/week is listed as 0.2. In Red Hook and Richmond the parts listedoperate half of the time as an arraignment part and the other half as either an all purpose part or a trial part. Summons courtrooms are not included in this list.18 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report

COURT OPERATIONS — ARRAIGNMENTSIn the Arraignment Part, defendants are notified ofthe charges that have been filed against them andare advised of their rights. The Arraignment judgealso hears arguments from the assistant districtattorney and defense counsel concerning bail whether it is appropriate and, if so, what form thebail should take and how much.cases disposed of at arraignment throughout all ofCriminal Court’s five county arraignment parts,about 41.9% of all arrest cases arraigned.Arraignment is also the first opportunity to disposeof misdemeanor cases. In 2017 there were 103,713Arraignment Sessions* - 2017CitywideBronxKings**MidtownNew YorkQueensRed HookRichmond***4,9269611,2802421,269818119237Day Sessions2,497482555242575339119185Night Sessions1,913363609057836300Weekend Day Sessions5161161160116116052Total Sessions* Arraignment sessions are the number of parts opened for the year devoted to arraignments. ** Kings County APAR6 opened for 1/2 day. Thetotal sessions for this part is the adjusted days times 1/2. *** Richmond County sessions were computed as follows: APAR1 # of days times 1/2,APAR2 # of days times 1/4, APAR4 # of days times 1/2. Richmond DAT is not credited with a part day since it is only opened for a portion of aday. **** Counties did not enter data for the Hospital ARR Part, except for NY County.19

Arrest to Arraignment — The ProcessThere is a tremendous amount of work that mustbe done after the police arrest a defendant andbefore the defendant is ready to appear in front ofa judge for arraignment. The police must meetwith the District Attorney’s Office, which will inturn draft a complaint. The police must also sendthe defendant’s fingerprints to Division of CriminalJustice Services (DCJS) in Albany and await thereturn of a criminal history. The arraignment courtclerks must create a court file, assign a docketnumber and enter the initial case information intothe Court’s database. Meanwhile, the Criminal Justice Agency must interview the defendant andmake a bail recommendation.Only after all of this takes place, does a defenseattorney speak to the defendant and file noticethat the defendant is ready to be arraigned by theCourt. This

4 New York City Criminal Court 2017 Annual Report Welcome — Administrative Judge Tamiko Amaker Hon. Tamiko Amaker Administrative Judge New York City Criminal Court We have reduced obstacles to bail by increasing the availability of credit card bail by removing ad-ministrative caps and as

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.