Truth, Justice, And A Nice White Country

3y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
1.43 MB
257 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Oscar Steel
Transcription

TRUTH, JUSTICE, &A NICE WHITE COUNTRYbyGREG JOHNSONCounter-Currents Publishing Ltd.San Francisco2015

Copyright 2015 by Greg JohnsonAll rights reservedCover image:Léon Frédéric, Les âges de l’ouvrier, 1895–1897, central panelMusée d’OrsayCover design byKevin I. SlaughterPublished in the United States byCOUNTER-CURRENTS PUBLISHING LTD.P.O. Box 22638San Francisco, CA 94122USAhttp://www.counter-currents.com/Hardcover ISBN: 978-1-935965-91-6Paperback ISBN: 978-1-935965-92-3E-book ISBN: 978-1-935965-93-0

CONTENTSIntroduction:Truth, Justice, & a Nice White CountryThe Problem1. White Extinction2. White Genocide3. He Told Us So: Patrick Buchanan’s Suicide of a Superpower4. Jared Taylor’s White Identity5. Kony 2012 & Jason Russell6. The Republican Party Must Perish7. The Conscience of a Cuckservative8. Ferguson, Garner, & the End of Gentrification9. Irreconcilable Differences: The Case for Racial DivorceNationalism: Petty & Grandiose10. Why I Support Scottish Independence11. “Let’s Call the Whole Thing Off”: In Defense of “Petty” Nationalism12. Grandiose NationalismUkraine & Russia13. The Ukraine Crisis14. The Ukraine Crisis: Taking Our Own Side15. Kevin Strom on Russia & Ukraine16. “North Americanism”: A Cautionary TaleThe Muslim Question17. The Muslim Problem18. Innocence of Muslims, Guilt of Jews, Interests of Whites

Sexual Politics19. The “Gay Marriage” Controversy20. Marriage: First & Second Class21. Confessions of a “Transphobic”22. Further Confessions of a “Transphobic”23. Does the Manosphere Morally Corrupt Men?24. Be Yourself?White Economics25. The End of Globalization26. Money for Nothing27. Thoughts on Debt Repudiation28. Brooks Adams on the Romans29. The Austrian Economic Apocalypse30. 5 to 9 Conservatism31. How About Fascist Medicine?32. The Boomerang GenerationVanguard Strategies33. Our Struggle Too: Propaganda &Organization34. Vanguardism, Vantardism, & Mainstreaming35. Vantard Strategies36. The Smartest Guy in the Room37. Spend Yourself, Save the World38. In My Grandiose Moments . . .About the Author

INTRODUCTIONTRUTH, JUSTICE, &A NICE WHITE COUNTRYThe North American New Right advocates ethnonationalism: the idea that the best way topreserve and promote peace, racial and cultural diversity, and the general welfare of theworld is to create racially and culturally homogeneous homelands for every distinct people.We think such arrangements are best for all peoples, but we are most interested in thewelfare of our own race, the white race, since it is the only human race threatened withsimple biological extinction. For this reason, we also call ourselves White Nationalists, sincewe are concerned primarily to preserve the white race in all of its genetic and culturaldiversity.But aren’t there higher concerns than the preservation of the white race? What abouthumanity? What about global biodiversity? What about the welfare of the world as a whole?My answer is simple: preserving whites contributes to these large goals in two ways. First, weare part of the world. But beyond that, whites are the part of the world that cares the mostabout the whole. If you want to save all those endangered species, save whites first.To boil our project down to a bumper sticker, we stand for “Truth, Justice, and a NiceWhite Country”—actually, a lot of nice white countries. The political mainstream, bycontrast, stands for lies, injustice, and mixing up every white nation into a multicultural,multiracial mess, destroying distinct identities and making hatred and violence inevitable.1. TRUTHIn what sense do we stand for truth? White Nationalists tell the truth about the differencesbetween the races, the sexes, and national identities. We tell the truth about the differencesbetween the normal and the abnormal, the healthy and the sick, the good and the evil, the justand the unjust. The rest of the political spectrum, however, is premised on telling lies aboutthese distinctions or ignoring them completely. Political correctness is just a species of lying:lying about fundamental human differences.2. J USTICEIn what sense do we stand for justice? And in what sense is the rest of the politicalspectrum opposed to justice?Mainstream politics today, Left and Right, is ruled by political correctness, which boils

down to making false excuses for privileged groups, who aren’t responsible for their failures,and leveling false accusations against whites, who are presented as a virtually omnipotentand uniquely malevolent race that is responsible for the failings of everyone else.So what would justice look like, if we stopped lying about human differences?Aristotle distinguishes between retributive and distributive justice. Retributive justice dealswith punishment. Distributive justice deals with rewards. Retributive justice requires makingthe punishment fit the crime. Under the reign of political correctness, however, criminals arefalsely excused and innocent whites are falsely accused of their crimes. Distributive justicerequires that rewards be proportionate to merits: equal people should be treated equally.Unequal people should be treated unequally. But Aristotle also pointed out that justicerequires that unequal rewards be proportionate to unequal merit. There is no justice if a manwho is 10 times better has 100 times more.Justice in an unequal world means rewarding unequal people unequally. And that meansthat there will be hierarchies in society: some people will have more power, moreresponsibility, more wealth, and more honor than others. Justice means that in every field ofendeavor, there will be elites: the best singers, the best athletes, the best civic leaders, etc.3. ELITISM & HIERARCHY?I think it is a mistake for people on the Right to reject equality as such and to endorse“hierarchy” and “elitism” as such.Treating unequal people equally is injustice. As William Blake says, “One law for the lionand ox is oppression.” But it is also unjust to treat equal people unequally. (Two laws for twolions is oppression as well.) In short:We are not opposed to equality as such, but only to unjust equality.We are not for hierarchy as such, but only just hierarchies.We are not for elitism as such, but only for just and deserving elites, elites based onmerit rather than money or birth or political corruption.When White Nationalists praise hierarchy and elitism as such, it is natural for people towonder, “What’s in their elitism for me?” After all, there can be corrupt and evil elites. Therecan be arbitrary and unjust hierarchies. Thus White Nationalists should stand first andforemost for justice. With the understanding that distributive justice in an unequal world willlead inevitably to just hierarchies and merit-based elites.4. THE COMMON GOODWhite Nationalism, as I have argued, should be both populist and elitist.1White Nationalism is populist, because a social system is just only if it pursues the commongood—the good of the whole people. An unjust social system is ruled for the benefit of

factional interests, whether of one man, a small elite, or the majority.White Nationalism is elitist, because the common good is best pursued in a society ruledby the best—meaning the most intelligent, idealistic, and public spirited, not merely the rich—and the best people are always a minority, an elite.But to make sure that such an elite does not become corrupt and start to rule in its owninterests at the expense of the common good, there should also be a popular, “democratic”element of government as well, to counter-balance the factional interests of the ruling elite.5. AN ELITIST STRATEGY FOR A POPULIST MOVEMENTThe white race is currently leaderless. We have no group looking out for white interests inthe political realm. If a White Nationalist society is to come into existence, it will need aleadership caste. To bring a White Nationalist society into existence, we need to start creatingthat leadership caste today. That means that our movement must aim at creating a raciallyconscious, racially-responsible elite. We must search for whites of higher than averageintelligence, morality, and taste—whites who are above average in courage and publicspiritedness. But as a populist movement, we believe that this new elite can and must berecruited from all social classes within the existing society.6. A NICE WHITE COUNTRYMargot Metroland uses an apt phrase to describe what we want: a nice white country.Terms like the ethnostate are, of course, useful because they are precise: what we want is tocreate sovereign nations for all distinct white ethnic groups. But it is much easier for people,particularly Americans, to relate to the idea of a nice white country.After all, Americans are constantly searching for nice white schools, nice white suburbs,nice white churches, nice white restaurants and parks and playgrounds. Many may not bewilling to own up to their racial motives. Not yet, anyway. But the desire to feel comfortableamong our own kind, particularly when we have children, is what has been driving half acentury of suburbanization and exurbanization.When whites finally wake up to the fact that the system will no longer let us have aseparate peace—that we can no longer run away to find nice white schools and nice whitecommunities—but that we have to finally stand and fight for a nice white country—thenWhite Nationalism will be a political possibility.Until then, we need to keep laying the metapolitical groundwork for that moment: we needto spread our ideas and build our community. We need to aim for the day when everyAmerican finds the idea of a nice white country at least morally and politically conceivable.We need to aim for the day when every American, if he does not know an actual WhiteNationalist, at least knows someone who does—preferably someone who does notcorrespond to negative stereotypes of our kind. Hastening that day is what Counter-Currentsand the North American New Right are all about.

Counter-Currents/North American New RightOctober 27, 2014 The present volume collects—by popular demand—some of my best recent essays fromthe Counter-Currents/North American New Right webzine. They primarily offer metapoliticalcommentary on political issues and events. Thus this collection most resembles myConfessions of a Reluctant Hater (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2010). For more“foundational” essays, see my New Right vs. Old Right (San Francisco: Counter-Currents,2013).I wish to Colin Liddell for his blurb and advice about the contents and ordering, MatthewPeters for his meticulous proofreading, James J. O’Meara for his thorough index, KevinSlaughter for his always superlative design work, Michael Polignano for creating the Kindleedition and for technical help throughout the creation of this book, and Kevin MacDonald,Tito Perdue, Charles Krafft, Tom Goodrich, Leo Yankevich, Jez Turner, Margot Metroland,Kerry Bolton, Guillaume Durocher, Lana Lokteff, Buttercup Dew, Irmin Vinson, and TedSallis for their blurbs for the jacket, cover, and website. I also want to thank the readers,writers, commenters, and donors who make Counter-Currents Publishing and the NorthAmerican New Right possible.This book is dedicated to the memory of my friend Beryl Cheetham, for her personalkindness to me and her selfless dedication to the White Nationalist cause.New York CityDecember 1, 2015

WHITE EXTINCTION*White Nationalists frequently claim that the current social and political system has put ourrace on the road to biological extinction. If present trends are not reversed, whites willdisappear as a distinct race.To many whites, this sounds like an absurd and alarmist claim, given that there areanywhere from 700 million to one billion of us on the planet today. Part of that skepticism is,I believe, simply psychological denial in the face of an unpleasant prospect. Non-whitesseldom show skepticism about white extinction. Indeed, our enemies take our eventualdisappearance for granted and openly gloat about our decline.I wish to argue, however, that white extinction is not an alarmist fantasy, but an alarmingfact, the inevitable conclusion of sober, informed analysis. Since my eyes glaze over whenanyone resorts to mathematical models, charts, graphs, and technical jargon, I will constructmy argument in the simplest possible terms. First, I will merely argue that white extinction isa plausible idea, not a far-fetched and fanciful one. Then I will argue that, given presenttrends, white extinction is not just possible, but inevitable.Biologists claim that up to 99.9% of species that have existed on this planet are nowextinct. Furthermore, many extinct species enjoyed dramatic advantages over whites. Forinstance, most extinct species existed far longer than our race before facing extinction. Theaverage lifespan of a species is 10 million years, whereas whites have been around for onlyabout 40,000 years. Some extinct species also existed in far greater numbers than whitestoday. For instance, in 1866, a single flock of passenger pigeons was observed in southernOntario. The flock was one mile wide, 300 miles long, and took 14 hours to pass. It isestimated to have contained 3.5 billion birds, which is 3-and-a-half to 4 times the entire whitepopulation of the world today. Less than 50 years later, however, the entire species wasextinct due to hunting and habitat loss. In 1914, Martha, the world’s last passenger pigeon,died in the Cincinnati Zoo.Some living species have existed for a very long time. The horseshoe crab has beenaround 450 million years. The coelacanth fish has existed for 400 million years. The lampreyhas been around for 350 million years. The New Zealand Tuatara lizard has been around for200 million years. But based on natural history, we can say that simply by virtue of existing,there is a 99.9% chance that our race will become extinct. If we want to be among the longterm survivors, we certainly can’t just depend upon luck.Human beings—whites especially—do have an advantage over other species: ourintelligence and creativity can allow us to discover and defeat the causes of extinction.Unfortunately, that same intelligence is now being used to create artificial conditions thatpromote white extinction. Extinctions are divided into natural (like the dinosaurs) and manmade (like the dodo and the passenger pigeon). White extinction is not natural but manmade. Thus, if our race is to survive, the first thing we must do is not defeat nature, but other

men.Extinction is not merely the death of all members of a race. After all, every living thingdies. But if all the members of a race die without replacing themselves, then the race becomesextinct. Thus extinction is not merely death—which comes to us all—but failure toreproduce. Extinction is inevitable if a race fails to reproduce itself. Extinction just is failureto reproduce.For the existing white population to reproduce itself, each couple must average 2.1children—2 children to replace themselves, and .1 to replace the race by taking up the slackof those who fail to reproduce at all. The image of a “normal” family—father, mother, andtwo children—is actually the happy, smiling face of racial annihilation, for if sub-replacementfertility persists long enough—if more people die than are born—our race will eventuallycease to exist. If you subtract units from a finite set long enough, you will reach zero. If youtake more money out of your account than you put in, you will reach zero. It is simple,mathematical necessity, first-order arithmetic.Having a third child is the difference between contributing to the death or the growth ofour race. Thus White Nationalists need to do everything in our power to create a new“normal” image of the three child white family, as opposed to the one or two child family.Unfortunately, white birth rates as a whole and in every white country are belowreplacement. This means that white extinction is inevitable if current trends are not reversed.What are the causes of reproductive failure, i.e., extinction? Biologists give four basiccauses:1. Loss of habitat, meaning the environment necessary for sustaining and reproducing thespecies. Loss of habitat can take place through sudden or slow geological or climatechange, the loss of food sources, etc.2. Invasive species, meaning competition for resources by another species in the sameecological niche.3. Hybridization, meaning reproduction, but not reproduction of one’s distinct biologicaltype. Hybridization is only possible if a sufficiently similar species invades one’secological niche.4. Excessive predation , meaning that a species is killed by predators faster than it canreproduce itself. Predation includes epidemics. Excessive predation is, in effect,genocide: the killing off of an entire group. Genocide can, however, be divided intohot and cold varieties. Hot genocide is the quick and violent extermination of a group.Cold genocide is the slow destruction of a group simply by establishing conditions thatmake its long-term survival impossible. Cold genocide could, therefore, also includethe other causes of extinction: habitat loss, invasive species, and hybridization.All of these causes of extinction can be natural or man-made.Now let’s examine our ongoing extinction in terms of these four biological causes.

Habitat loss: the ongoing conquest of nature through white science and technology wouldseem to be expanding white habitats. Man can live at the north and south poles, the bottom ofthe oceans, and even in space. It is conceivable that someday we will be able to transformother planets into human habitats. But there is a sense in which white reproduction issuffering due to habitat loss: whites do not reproduce in unsafe environments, and one of thegreatest causes of unsafe breeding environments is the presence of non-whites.Now, in the past, whites had high birth-rates while surrounded by non-whites. But thesenon-whites were enslaved or otherwise subordinate and forced to emulate white standards ofbehavior. So whites specifically feel unsafe around free and feral non-white populations. Thesearch for safe white breeding spaces is one of the driving forces behind suburbanization andexurbanization since the collapse of white supremacy, the emancipation of indigenous nonwhite populations, and the flooding of white lands by non-white immigrants.One could argue that the mere presence of non-whites in white breeding spaces is notsufficient to suppress white fertility, since non-whites are feared specifically as potentialsources of resource competition, hybridization, and predation, which brings us to the othercauses of white extinction.Invasive species: whites in virtually every white nation are now facing demographiccompetition from non-white immigrants. Even if non-white immigration is cut off, whites willstill face demographic competition from existing non-white populations which are usuallymore fertile than whites.Hybridization: race-mixing or miscegenation is a form of reproduction, in the sense thatboth parties pass their genes on to the next generation. But it is simultaneously a cause ofracial extinction, since it fails to reproduce the racial type. Miscegenation is inevitable ifdifferent human races are allowed to associate freely in the same environment. Thus in thepast, when racial integrity was valued, there were social and legal barriers to miscegenationin multiracial societies. Those barriers have been swept away.But people are not merely “free” to miscegenate. Miscegenation is actively encouraged bythe media and educational system.Miscegenation is also being forced upon whites by inter-racial rape, which is almostalways perpetrated by non-white men on white women. This form of rape is also beingactively promoted by cultural phenomena such as pornography and non-white resentmentmongering, and by social policies that encourage non-white immigration, the integration ofwhite and non-white populations, and failure

Confessions of a Reluctant Hater (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2010). For more “foundational” essays, see my New Right vs. Old Right (San Francisco: Counter-Currents, 2013). I wish to Colin Liddell for his blurb and advice about the contents and ordering, Matthew

Related Documents:

Official list (in alphabetical order) 05 Disputes 394 Rehabilitation 395 . Adventure Nice Advik Nice Adyana Nice Adylaide Nice Adylee Nice Adyleena Nice Adylen Naughty Adyline Nice Adylyn Nice Adyn Naughty Adynn Naughty Adysen Naughty Adyson Nice Adysson Nice Ae-Sook Nice Aedan Nice Aeden Naughty

Mr.Justice Sh.Riaz Ahmed, HCJ Mr.Justice Munir A.Sheikh Mr.Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry Mr.Justice Qazi Muhammad Farooq Mr.Justice Mian Muhammad Ajmal Mr.Justice Syed Deedar Hussain Shah Mr.Justice Hamid Ali Mirza Mr.Justice Abdul Hameed Dogar Mr.Justice Muhammad Nawaz Abbasi CONSTITUTION PETITION NO.15 OF 2002

Criminal Justice Information Project Catherine Plummer, SEARCH Pamela Scanlon, Automated Regional Justice Information System Laurie Smith, Kalamazoo Criminal Justice Council Integrated Justice Information System Institute (Integrated Justice Information Systems): Susan Bates, Justice Management Inc. Steve Mednick, Law Offices of Steven G.

Justice David S. Wiggins Justice Daryl L. Hecht Justice Brent R. Appel Justice Thomas D. Waterman Justice Edward M. Mansfield Justice Bruce B. Zager In Memoriam Chief Justice W. Ward Reynoldson (Iowa Supreme Court 1971-1987) Justice James H. Carter (Iowa Supreme Court 1982-2006)

This study evaluated the effectiveness of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (SATRC), using the theoretical and conceptual framework of the five pillars of transitional justice. Chitsike (2012) identified the five Pillars of Transitional Justice that the study uses. For that reason, Truth-Seeking and Truth-Telling, Trials

Community School students: (l-r) Justice William J. Crain, Justice Piper D. Griffin, Chief Justice John L. Weimer, Justice Jay B. McCallum, and Justice James T. Genovese. (l-r) Louisiana Supreme Court Justice William J. Crain, Chief Justice John L. Weimer(seated), and Law Library of . Louisiana Director Miriam Childs.

areas of the health and care system, helping to improve outcomes where this is needed most. NICE provides evidence-based guidance and advice to help improve health and social care services. The uptake of NICE guidance is influenced by close relationships with partners such as NHS England, NHS Improvement and Public Health England (PHE). Since 2002 and the publication of NICE’s first clinical .

Delta Resumes Daily Nonstop Flights between New York-JFK and Nice Delta will restart its daily service between New York - JFK and Nice Nice beginning this weekend. The flight is the only non-stop service between the United States adn Nice and will be operated this summer