Novell Teaming Vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Server

2y ago
24 Views
2 Downloads
1.34 MB
11 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Emanuel Batten
Transcription

Business White PaperWORKGROUP COLLABORATIONwww.novell.comNovell Teaming vs. MicrosoftOffice SharePoint Server* *A Competitive Comparison of Next-generation Collaboration Solutions12

Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint ServerTable of Contents:2 . . . . . Overview2 . . . . . Why Next-generationCollaboration?2. . . . . . How Next-generationCollaboration ImprovesWork Processes3. . . . . . Key Features ofNext-generationCollaboration Systems4 . . . . . How to Choose aNext-generationCollaboration Solution9. . . . . . Feature Comparison:Novell Teaming vs.Microsoft SharePoint10 . . . . . Conclusionp. 1

OverviewNext-generation collaboration tools provide users with betterways to work in a flatworld—to collaborate effectively across distances and time zones.1 “The Next American Frontier,”Michael Malone. Wall StreetJournal: May 19, 2008, A15.2 Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration ChangesEverything. Don Tapscott,Anthony Williams. Portfolio:2006.As a business or IT manager, you’re no doubtconcerned about improving productivity andreducing costs. And there’s no better way todo both than by deploying a next-generationcollaboration solution. To help you choosethe best solution for your organization, thispaper will review relevant business needsand m arket trends, explore how these tools improve work proces ses and proposea framework for evaluating your options.We’ll begin with an analysis of next-generation collaboration systems and how they can provide a foundation for better business results.Next, we’ll outline four criteria for choosingnext-generation c ollaboration tools. Finally,to aid in the e valuation process, we’ll providea table comparing the features includedin Novell Teaming and Microsoft* OfficeSharePoint* Server (Microsoft SharePoint).Why Next-generation Collaboration?Several factors drive interest in next-generationcollaboration solutions. Most importantly,informed managers understand that theirorganizations succeed when their employeesare productive. They know that their peopledo their best when they have the right tools tohelp them coordinate their activities, find theinformation they need and develop their ideas.Market and technology trends provide another reason to roll out next-generationcollaboration solutions. Many users, accustomed to social networking on theInternet, want to use similar tools in theirprofessional pursuits. Far from serving as adistraction, these users understand that nextgeneration collaboration tools canp. 2make them more creative and increasetheir productivity.In many workplaces, teams are distributed,and contributors may meet face to faceonly occasionally, or sometimes not at all.The results of a survey at one large companyshowed that almost 20 percent of employeeshad never met their boss face to face, andfurthermore, half of those never expectedto.1 Next-generation collaboration toolsprovide users with better ways to work in aflat world—to collaborate effectively acrossdistances and time zones.Finally, both management and employeesunderstand that they need technology to helpthem make the best possible use of workthey produce: a document or presentationdeveloped by one team for one purposecan often be put to work to solve otherbusiness problems as well. Next-generationcollaboration tools facilitate this process.How Next-generation Collaboration ImprovesWork ProcessesThe need for next-generation collaborationsystems, however, goes beyond end-userdemand, supporting distributed teams, reusing work products or even respondingto market pressures. Don Tapscott and Anthony Williams, management professorsand business consultants, describe a newway of working called “peer production”and say that it “will displace traditional corporation hierarchies as the key engineof wealth creation in the economy.”2 Nextgeneration collaboration systems support

Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Serverthese powerful new ways of working, whichlead to greater productivity.The prospect of next-generation collaborationstarted with the combination of the Internet,the World Wide Web and the pervasive useof e-mail. Together, these three tools madeit easy for people to share ideas beyondorganizational and geographic boundaries.Information and ideas flowed among peoplemore freely than ever before. However, as isthe case for any invention, these powerfulnew tools created a new set of problems.The World Wide Web, for example, combinedthe ideas of hypertext documents and theInternet to help scientific researchers shareinformation as they developed new ideasand conclusions. The subsequent explosionof Web sites went far beyond the scientificcommunity. Though this did, indeed, make iteasier to share information, it also created anew problem by requiring a Webmaster todevelop Web sites and pages.www.novell.comproductivity. This is at the core of the idea ofpeer production: people with the right skillsapplying themselves to the problem at handwithout letting the tools get in the way.Key Features of Next-generationCollaboration SystemsSearch helps users find critical information—documents, presentations, spreadsheets,wikis and more—they need to accomplisha particular task. It also helps them find colleagues with expertise they can leverage, orinformation about related projects underway.Workspaces help people coordinate theirefforts and provide a context for work orinformation. They bring together the right information resources and people for aproject or topic of interest: team members,goals, timelines, tasks, documents, images,E-mail messages with attachments madeit easy to share large documents with justabout anyone in the world with the click ofa button. The overuse, or misuse, of thispervasive and useful tool creates its own setof problems, including overloaded mailboxesand the need to manage a confusing jumbleof document versions.The idea behind next-generation collaboration,also referred to as “Web 2.0,” is to take thenext step in enabling powerful new modesof peer production. This involves breakingthe information logjam imposed by the staticmodel of the Web, as well as the overloadand frustration sometimes created by e-mail.A next-generation collaboration systemmakes it easy for anyone to use, develop orshare information to enhance creativity andcollaboration, all with the goal of increasingp. 3

blogs, wiki articles and so on. When teammembers work next to each other, muchof this contextual information is shoutedover cubicle walls, shared in casual hallwayconversations or discussed in after-hoursgatherings. Team workspaces help putthis information online, making it easier formembers of distributed teams to come upto speed more quickly, avoid mistakes andpreserve their work for future reference.Information preparation, presentation andsharing are supported in workspace folders.Heavy information preparation includesusing desktop productivity applicationssuch as OpenOffice*, Microsoft Office andAdobe* Creative Suite to prepare documents,spread sheets, presentations, designs, imagesand more. Developing these documentsinvolves multiple reviews and revisions,often with changes marked for consideration.Light information preparation includes creatingblogs, wikis and discussion forum postings,all of which can be done completely online.The final result of all information preparationis sharing documents with peers or publishingthem to a larger audience.Enterprise social networking tools helpemployees get to know each other. They alsoprovide a range of casual, but essential, toolsfor building teams online. Through the use ofpersonal workspaces, surveys, rating systems,tags, blogs, wikis and more, these tools givedistributed teams a useful substi tute for thecasual interactions of those in proximity.An additional benefit of these tools is thatthey provide a compelling alternative to e-mailand attachments for collaboration tasks likereviewing documents, aggregating feedbackor collecting ideas.Forms and workflow automation make repeated processes more efficient and reliable. These tools give managers thepower to execute business processes ina consistent way, and use their intimateknowledge of these processes to automatep. 4them more effectively than outside consultantsever could.Web presentation systems bring all ofthe previous elements together in a useful arrangement for users. Functional elementsare presented in a Web browser, and areoften associated with a Web Portal system.In addition, next-generation collaborationsystems have a set of Web services to enable integration with other applications.Online Meetings. Although not a focus forthis paper, it’s important to point out thatnext-generation collaboration systems areoften complemented by a real-time optionfor online meetings, where people share presentations and other documents live.These systems include capabilities for sharingdata, supporting voice communi cations andallowing for Instant Messages. For customersinterested in the full range of asynchronousand real-time next-generation collaboration,Novell offers Novell Teaming Conferencing.How to Choose aNext-generationCollaboration SolutionAs you evaluate next-generation collaborationproducts, it’s important to find the right fitfor your organization. While Microsoft OfficeSharePoint Server is well known in thecollaboration category, Novell provides anattractive alternative with Novell Teaming.If you’re currently evaluating next-generationcollaboration solutions, there’s no bettertime to learn about the following benefitsof Novell Teaming:Flexibility is built in to Novell Teaming.You can use the Novell collaboration system with many different servicesand applications. Microsoft SharePointrequires a total commitment to Microsoft’sofferings, with the added migrationand contract costs that go along withthat commitment.

Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Serverwww.novell.comNovell Teaming is More FlexibleCustomers who choose Microsoft SharePointmust purchase all of their software fromMicrosoft: office productivity tools, servers,desktops, services, e-mail and calendaringenvironments, and development tools.What’s more, all these systems need to beupgraded to the latest versions. Because ofits support for a number of different openstandards, Novell Teaming gives IT teamsa choice in their directories, databases,development environments, user operatingenvironments, e-mail systems and more.It costs less to acquire and own NovellTeaming than Microsoft SharePoint.Novell Teaming is designed to connectpeople and information. SharePoint isdesigned around building Web pages.Novell Teaming features an open development model that invites innovationfrom a broad community.SystemIf your organization has significant investments in mixed environments, or if you arenot ready to upgrade to all the latest versionsof Microsoft systems, Novell Teaming is agreat choice for you.Following is a comparison table of supportedsoftware for the two systems:Novell TeamingMicrosoft SharePointServerSUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10Windows ServerWindows ServerIdentity Management IntegrationNovell eDirectory Active DirectoryActive DirectoryDevelopment EnvironmentJ2EE.NETPortal EnvironmentLiferay, an open, JSR-168 standardsSharePoint Portal Serverbased portal systemOffice Productivity SoftwareOpenOfficeMicrosoft OfficeWordPerfect*Microsoft Office 2007E-mail and Calendaring SystemNovell GroupWise Microsoft Exchange 2007Lotus* Notes*Other standards-based systemsMicrosoft Exchange 2007DesktopSUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10Windows VistaWindows XPMac* OS XWindows VistaWindows XPDatabaseMySQL*MS SQL ServerOracle*MS SQL ServerAs you evaluate whether Novell Teaming or Microsoft SharePoint is the right fit for you, takeinto account the cost of updating all of your desktop and laptop machines to Office 2007 andWindows Vista, as well as installing the latest versions of Active Directory and Windows Server.For most organizations, this also implies a three-year commitment to a service agreement.If you’re not ready to take these expensive and time-consuming steps just to get ready todeploy a collaboration system, Novell Teaming can be a good fit for your organization.p. 5Novell Teaming gives ITteams a choice in theirdirectories, databases,development environments, user operatingenvironments, e-mailsystems and more.

Practical Applicationsfor Next-generationCollaboration SystemsManaging projectsand project portfolios.Execute projects moreefficiently with a singlelocation for team membersto access project contentand colleagues.Forming Communities ofPractice. Pose questionsand solicit answers fromexperts via threadeddiscussion folders.Managing problemresolution. Use Incidentfolders to track status andquickly move issues toresolution with automatedworkflow.3 The Forms Server, SearchServer and SharePointDesigner were not coveredby the Microsoft LicensingAssistant. List prices for thesecomponents are published er/FX102176831033.aspx.These prices do not includeSoftware Assurance.Novell Teaming is More AffordableIt’s available as a stand-alone product or aspart of the complete workforce productivitysolution represented by the Novell OpenWorkgroup Suite. All of the core featuresneeded to enable team collaboration areavailable in Novell Teaming, with only one additional module option: Advanced Workflow. What’s more, with Novell Teaming,it’s easy to build workspaces, define formsand create workflows with Web-based tools.No addi tional purchase of development toolsis required. Novell Teaming is 55 per user.You can deploy any number of Novell Teaming servers needed to support your users at noadditional per-server charge.With Microsoft SharePoint, there are severalcost-related issues to consider:Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 (alsor eferred to as WSS) is included with MicrosoftWindows Server. Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 is for small d epartmental useonly, with limited search capabilities andlimited support for forms and workflow.Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Standard(MOSS) is for larger groups. The list priceis 94 per Client Access License (CAL).Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Enterpriseis an add-on, and requires another 75 perCAL. The Enterprise version is required todevelop and use custom forms.A server license is also required for eachserver deployed in the system. Each servercosts 4,424.Microsoft Office SharePoint Server SearchServer is required to perform any searches inthe system. The list price is 8,213 per server.Office Forms Server 2007 is required forforms. The price is 4,424, plus 54 per CAL.SharePoint Designer is a desktop development tool needed to create formsand configure Web parts for custom pages.It costs 187 per d eveloper seat.A Microsoft SQL Server license adds 730to the price tag for a single-user system.For a concrete example of relative costs, assume the management team of a midsized company decides to provide nextgeneration collaboration software to all oftheir 5,500 employees. The following showsthe anticipated software bill of materialsfor a Microsoft SharePoint solution andan alternative based on Novell Teaming.This comparison does not take intoaccount the additional costs to upgrade Exchange, Office or Active Directory,which are also required to deployMicrosoft SharePoint 2007.Using the Microsoft Licensing Assistant tool,and including Software Assurance, prices forMicrosoft Office SharePoint Server 2007Enterprise would be as follows:Novell Teaming, by contrast, has a simplepurchasing program and user-licensing model.QuantityCost per UnitTotalMicrosoft Office SharePoint Server LicenseItem5 6,503 32,515Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Standard CALs5,500 137 753,500Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Enterprise CALs5,500 110 605,000Windows Server 2008 Standard License7 1,067 7,469Windows Server 2008 Standard CALs5,500 44 242,000Microsoft Office SharePoint Server Search Server1 8,213 8,213Office Forms Server1 4,4243 4,424Office Forms Server CALs5,500 54 297,000SharePoint Designer10 187 1,870Microsoft SQL Server License1 730 730TOTALNOTE: All costs are in US dollars.p. 6 1,952,721

Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Serverwww.novell.comA cost breakdown for Novell Teaming for the same company would be as follows:Practical Applicationsfor Next-generationCollaboration SystemsQuantityCost per UnitTotalNovell TeamingItem5,500 55 302,500Novell Teaming Maintenance5,500 14 77,000Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 1043 1,499 4,497MySQL51 0TOTALCreating and managingdocuments. Edit,comment on and trackversions of text documents, spreadsheets,presentations and more. 0 383,997NOTE: All costs are in US dollars.In this example, Novell Teaming is less thanone-fifth the cost of Microsoft SharePoint.Barb Mosher and Brice Dunwoodie of CMSWire say of Microsoft SharePoint pricingthat “the licensing model alone is enoughto send most of them [prospects] running,with tails tucked tightly between their legs.”6Novell Teaming costs less to own as well, withlower hardware requirements and the abilityto virtualize services, which also lowers datacenter costs. In addition, since Novell Teamingrequires fewer servers, power, cooling, maintenance and backup costs are reduced.The cost comparison above also assumesa centralized SharePoint deployment. Sincemany corporate departments are rolling outtheir own Windows SharePoint Server 3.0 deployments, management costs can be evengreater than our centralized example wouldindicate. The proliferation of uncontrolledWindows SharePoint Server deploymentscreates significant challenges for IT andincreases labor costs dramatically.Novell Teaming Offers aMore Usable DesignOne of the key differences between the traditional Web and next-generation collaborationis that in the latter, users are empowered toshare information without needing a Webmasterto build their pages. Unfortunately, MicrosoftSharePoint is designed with many Web1.0 assumptions, including the notion thata platoon of Web designers need to be employed, and provisioned with SharePointDesigner, to build custom pages. This need tohire additional personnel not only makes thesolution much more expensive, it increasesopportunity costs by complicating deployment.With Novell Teaming, IT teams can deploythe system and let user departments quicklyget to work creating workspaces, sharinginformation, coordinating their activities andmoving the business forward. One of thepillars of Novell Teaming is the workspace,which brings together interested peopleand related information in a single place.SharePoint doesn’t have an equivalent to theworkspace, relying on Web pages instead.Though Novell Teaming is a Web application,the focus is on collaboration inside the workspace, not on deploying developers tobuild Web pages. After all, a collaborationsystem should help users get work donewithout imposing barriers. What’s more,with Novell Teaming, it’s easy to create formsand workflows using a Web interface insteadof requiring extra design tools. In all respects,the design of Novell Teaming is centered onsimplicity and empowering users themselvesto enable collaboration.An additional benefit of the Novell Teamingdesign is that users can easily navigate thestructure of workspaces and folders andlearn the context of the information they’reusing. With Microsoft SharePoint, once information is uploaded into the system,it’s hard to find again. This isn’t a problemwith Novell Teaming. With its simple interface,users easily navigate through the system tosee how projects and other collections ofinformation relate to each other. When theyp. 7Automating workprocesses. Leverageforms and automatedworkflow to reduce errorsand move critical businessprocesses online.4 SUSE Linux EnterpriseServer 10 Priority with oneyear of updates and fixesand unlimited telephone andelectronic support. This figurealso assumes the smallernumber of servers required byNovell Teaming, as well as thefact that separate forms andsearch servers are not needed.5 MySQL L2 support is includedwith SUSE Linux EnterpriseServer 10.6 “SharePoint Web ContentManagement Licensing wasBotched.” Barb Mosher,Brice Dunwoodie. CMSWire.Feb 2008. contentmanagement-licensing-wasbotched-002284.php

those changes to the Kablink community.The changes can then be included in a laterrelease of the product, so that all customersbenefit from the innovations driven by a leadgroup. Proprietary vendors, even large ones,can’t match the level of innovation that comesfrom this sort of an open model.7 The Wisdom of Crowds.James Surowiecki.8 Democratizing Innovation.Eric von Hippel. MIT Press:2005.search, the context of that search is also justas easy to see.In addition to its simple and powerful Webpresentation, Novell Teaming provides aset of Web services that give developers asimple way to integrate Novell Teaming withother systems. This extensibility and easeof customization, the result open softwareand open standards support, is one of theproduct’s most significant benefits.Novell Teaming Offers aBroader Model of InnovationThe most powerful ideas come from a broadset of diverse minds, rather than from smallerteams of like-minded peers. EconomistJames Surowiecki says, “under the rightcircumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartestpeople in them.”7 At Novell, we believe thatthe larger and more diverse that group is, thebetter; which is why we leverage the Kablinkopen source project as the foundation forNovell Teaming innovation.Customers or partners who make modifi cations to Novell Teaming code can submitp. 8A broad development process that involvessoftware vendors, partners and customerswill produce more breakout features than avendor team working in isolation. Eric vonHippel, head of the Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group at the MIT Sloan Schoolof Management, conducts research and publishes findings on what he describes as“user-centered” innovation. He points outthat “a growing body of empirical workshows that users are the first to developmany and perhaps the most new consumerand industrial products.”8 He adds thatthe majority of these innovations proveto be attractive to larger markets, and areoften commercialized by manufacturers.We understand that for creating breakout solutions, the open model of software development is superior to the older, proprietary one. In the software industry, theLinux* operating environment, the Apache*Web server and the Java* 2 Execution Environment are three prime examplesof how well this model works.Another component of innovation is the easewith which users and developers can buildvalue-added modules that extend a product’sutility and functionality. As is the case withMicrosoft SharePoint, Novell Teaming has anumber of ways to extend or customize theproduct, including Web services interfacesusing SOAP, system templates and portalconfigurations. Additionally, Novell Teamingoffers something Microsoft SharePoint can’t:a view into the code behind the interfaces,making it easier for developers to understandsystem behavior and how they can use it.

Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft Office SharePoint Serverwww.novell.comFeature Comparison: Novell Teaming vs. Microsoft SharePointAlong with the four criteria for finding a next-generation collaboration system that meets yourneeds, the following feature comparison table can help you evaluate the merits of Novell Teamingvs. Microsoft erver 3.0Microsoft OfficeSharePointServer 2007Enterprise Social Networking ToolsWikis, BlogsYesYesYesUser WorkspacesYesNoYesExpertise LocationYesNoYesPresence IntegrationYesYesYesDashboards (summaries, roll ups)YesNoYesLink To, Find Users with Related ContentYesNoYesTaggingYesNoNoWorkspaces and CoordinationDiscussion Forums, TasksYesYesYesWikis, Blogs, SurveysYesYesYesShared DocumentsYesYesYesCalendarsYesYesYesInformation Preparation, Sharing and PresentationPolicies, Auditing and ComplianceYesYesYesSite TemplatesYesYesYesWorkflow-managed ContentYesYesYesInternet Web Content ManagementNoYesYesDocument Lifecycle Workflow(Draft Pending Published)YesNoYesRich Group Authoring (WYSIWYG formatting,image sizing, etc.)YesYesYesVersioning on All Data, Metadata, esYesDynamic Folders (using search to customizefolder “contents”)YesNoNoSearchSearch across Site ContentYesYesYesACL-filtered Search across Site ContentYesNoYesSearch within DocumentsYesNoYesFederated Search (Web sites, file servers)NoNoYesForms and WorkflowBrowser-based FormsYesYesYesOnline Designer for Creating Custom FormsYesNoNoCustom Forms Supported out of the BoxYesNoNoForm Export/ImportYesNoYesForm ReuseYesNoYesSimple WorkflowYesYesYesAdvanced WorkflowYesNoYescontinued on next pagep. 9

Novell Teaming enables you to benefit from the innovation and ideasof a broad community of developers and arePointServer 3.0Microsoft OfficeSharePointServer 2007Web Presentation and ServicesSingle-department SolutionYesYesYesMulti-department SolutionYesNoYesOffice Application IntegrationPartialPartialYesAJAX UIYesPartialPartialContextual Help (editable)YesNoNoBrowser: Firefox, Opera, Internet ExplorerYesPartialPartialExternal Users as Team MembersYesYesYesLDAP AuthenticationYesNoYesGranular Access ControlYesNoYesBasic Role and Team SupportYesNoYesManagement and SecurityContact your local NovellSolutions Provider, or callNovell at:1 800 714 3400 U.S./Canada1 801 861 1349 Worldwide1 801 861 8473 FacsimileNovell, Inc.404 Wyman StreetWaltham, MA 02451 USAIntegrationRSS SupportYesYesYesAct as a File System (WebDav Server)YesYesYesE-mail Content in/outYesYesYesMash-up CapabilityYesYesYesConclusionThe right next-generation collaborationsystem can put your organization on trackfor increased productivity, better decisions,lower costs, more effective teams and muchmore. By rolling out the right system, youcan give your organization a competitiveedge and more effectively meet its goals.The good news is that the market for thesesystems has matured and offers some greatchoices. The opportunity for you is to find acollaboration system that meets your business, financial and organizational needs.With Novell Teaming, Novell provides a feature-rich, affordable and flexible alternativeto Microsoft SharePoint. And, with its opendevelopment model, Novell Teaming enablesyou to benefit from the innovation and ideasof a broad community of developers andusers. If your organization has investmentsor interest in a mixed IT environment (withboth open and proprietary products andserver operating environments), identity solutions, open development standardssuch as J2EE—not to mention lower costsand simplified deployment— Novell Teamingis an excellent choice. When it comes totaking advantage of the benefits of nextgeneration collaboration, Novell Teamingis the right fit.462-002090-004 08/08 2008 Novell, Inc. All rights reserved. Novell, the Novell logo, the N logo, GroupWise, SUSE and ZENworksare registered trademarks, and eDirectory is a trademark of Novell, Inc. in the United States and other countries.*Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. All other third-party trademarks are the property of their respective owners.12

Office SharePoint * Server A Competitive Comparison of Next-generation Collaboration Solutions Novell Logo 1 The registered trademark, , appears to the right and on the same baseline as the Logo. Minimum Size Requirements The Novell Logo should NOT be printed smaller than 3 picas (0.5 inches or 12.5 mm) in width. Clear-space Requirements

Related Documents:

Novell www.novell.com Novell Confidential Manual (99a) 15 April 2004 iFolder 2.1 June 25, 2004 INSTALLATION AND ADMINISTRATION GUIDE. Novell Confidential Manual (99a) 15 April 2004 . June 25, 2004 INSTALLATION AND ADMINISTRATION GUIDE. Novell Confidential Manual (99a) 15 April 2004 Legal Notices Novell, Inc. makes no representations or .

Novell Native File Access Pack for NetWare 5.1 Installation and Administration Guide . Novell Native File Access Pack for NetWare 5.1 Installation and Administration Guide 100-004513-001 A April 4, 2002 Novell Confidential Manual 99a 38 July 17, 2001 Novell Trademarks

The Novell Client is a powerful and feature rich service that is necessary to gain the full functionality of a Novell NetWare system. The Novell 4.91 client runs on a Windows 2000 or Windows XP workstations and allows your . To launch the Novell Client installation, run the SETUPNW.EXE file as depicted in Illustration 1. Step 2 - Choose the .

For information about the other Access Manager devices and features, see the following: Novell Access Manager 3.1 SP5 Administration Console Guide Novell Access Manager 3.1 SP5 Identity Server Guide Novell Access Manager 3.1 SP5 Policy Guide Novell Access Manager 3.1 SP5 J2EE Agent Guide Novell Access Manager 3.1 SP5 SSL VPN Server Guide

Novell www.novell.com novdocx (ENU) 29 January 2007 Novell Password Management Administration Guide Pa

SecureLogin Client Utility to customize Novell SecureLogin to your preferences and requirements. 1.1 Management Utilities Novell SecureLogin has two management utilities: Section 1.1.1, "Administrative Manage Utilities," on page 7 Section 1.1.2, "The Novell SecureLogin Client Utility," on page 9

PSP approach implemented within each state is highly variable and contingent upon the consultant(s) and or trainer(s) used to support state and/or program implementation.12 Is the primary service provider approach to teaming an accepted practice technique? The PSP approach is an accepted teaming appro

used when setting windows hooks . Relies on the user api hook . User Api Hook Special hooking mechanism introduced to support Windows themes RegisterUserApiHook Can only be registered by privileged processes Requires the TCB privilege Caller must be running as SYSTEM Allows Windows to load a theme client module into every GUI application . Smashing the Atom . Theme Subsystem Introduced in .