# 10-725: Optimization Fall 2012 Lecture 5: Gradient Desent .

3y ago
40 Views
638.22 KB
10 Pages
Last View : 21d ago
Upload by : Javier Atchley
Transcription

10-725: OptimizationFall 2012Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedLecturer: Geoff Gordon/Ryan TibshiraniScribes: Cong Lu/Yu ZhaoNote: LaTeX template courtesy of UC Berkeley EECS dept.Disclaimer: These notes have not been subjected to the usual scrutiny reserved for formal publications.They may be distributed outside this class only with the permission of the Instructor.5.1Choose step sizeRecall that we have f : Rn R, convex and differentiable. We want to solvemin f (x)x Rni.e, to find x? such that f (x? ) min f (x) .Gradient descent: choose initial x(0) Rn , repeat :x(k) x(k 1) tk · f (x(k 1) ), k 1, 2, 3, .Stop at some point(When to stop is quite dependent on what problems you are looking at).Figure 5.1 is shows a example that we cannot always continue and it depends where we start. i.e. If we startat a spot somewhere between the purple and orange, it would stay there and go nowhere.Figure 5.1: At each iteration, consider the expansion3Tf (y) f (x) f (x) (y x) 5-112ky xk2t

5-2Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedWe can use quadratic approximation, replacing usual 2 f (x) by 1t I, then we havewhich is a linear combination to f , andf (x) f (x)T (y x),which is a proximity term to x, with weight12ky xk ,2t12t .Then, choose next point y x to minimize quadratic approximationx x t f (x)as shown in Figure 5.2.Figure 5.2: blue Bluepointis x, red point is x point is x, red point is x 5.1.15Fixed step sizeSimply take tk t for all k 1, 2, 3, , can diverge if t is too big. Consider f (x) (10x1 2 x2 2 /2), Figure 5.3shows the gradient descent after 8 steps. It can be slow if t is too small . As for the same example, gradientdescent after 100 steps in Figure 5.4, and gradient descent after 40 appropriately sized steps in Figure 5.5.Convergence analysis will give us a better idea which one is just right.5.1.2Backtracking line searchAdaptively choose the step size:First, fix a parameter 0 β 1, then at each iteration, start with t 1, and whilet2f (x f (x)) f (x) k f (x)k ,2update t βt, as shown in Figure 5.6 (from B & V page 465), for us 4x f (x), α 1/2.Backtracking line search is simple and work pretty well in practice. Figure 5.7 shows that backpackingpicks up roughly the right step size(13 steps) for the same example, with β 0.8 (B & V recommendβ (0.1, 0.8)).

5-3Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedFixed step sizeSimply take tk t for all k 1, 2, 3, . . ., can diverge if t is too big.Consider f (x) (10x21 x22 )/2, gradient descent after 8 steps:20Figure 5.3: 10 20 100* 20 1001020Can be slow if t is too small. Same example, gradient descent after100 steps:20Figure 5.4:710 20 100* 205.1.3 1001020Exact line search8At each iteration, do the best e can along the direction of the gradient,t argminf (x s f (x)).s 0Usually, it is not possible to do this minimization exactly.Approximations to exact line search are often not much more efficient than backtracking, and it’s not worthit.

5-4Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedSame example, gradient descent after 40 appropriately sized steps:20Figure 5.5: 10 20 100* 20 1001020InterpretationThis porridge is too hot! – toocold!5.6:– juuussst right. ConvergenceFigureanalysis later will give us a better idea9(From B & V page 465)5.2Convergence analysisFor us5.2.1x rf (x), 1/2Convergence analysis for fixed step sizeAssume that f : Rn R is convex and differentiable, and additionallyk f (x) f (y)k Lkx ykf or any x, yi.e. , f is Lipschitz continuous with constant L 0Theorem 5.1 Gradient descent with fixed step size t 1/L satisfiesf (x(k) f (x? ) kx(0) x? k22tk11

5-5Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedBacktracking picks up roughly the right step size (13 steps):20Figure 5.7: 10 20 100* 20 100Here(B & Vraterecommend2i.e. gradientdescent has0.8convergenceO(1/k)i.e. to get f (x(k) ) f (x? ) , we need O(1/ ) iterations1020(0.1, 0.8))Proof: Since f Lipschitz with constant L, which means 2 f LI, we have x, y, z12(x y)T ( 2 f (z) LI)(x y) 0Which meansLkx yk2 (x y)T 2 f (z)(x y)Based on Taylor’s Remainder Theorem, we have x, y, z [x, y]1f (y) f (x) f (x)T (y x) (x y)T 2 f (z)(x y)2LT f (x) f (x) (y x) ky xk22(5.1)Plugging in x x t f (x),f (x ) f (x) f (x)T (x t x x) Lkx t x xk22Lt f (x) (1 )tk f (x)k22Taking 0 t 1/L, 1 Lt/2 1/2, we havetf (x ) f (x) k f (x)k22Since f is convex, f (x) f (x ) f (x)T (x x ) we have(5.2)

5-6Lecture 5: Gradient Desent Revisitedtf (x ) f (x) k f (x)k22t f (x ) f (x)T (x x ) k f (x)k221 2 f (x ) (kx x k kx x t f (x)k2 )2t1 f (x ) (kx x k2 kx x k2 )2t(5.3)Summing over iterations, we havekX1(f (x(i) f (x )) (kx(0) x k2 kx(k) x k2 )2ti 1(5.4)1 kx(0) x k22tFrom (?), we can see that f (x(k) ) is nonincreasing. Then we havef (x(k) ) f (x ) 5.2.2kkx(0) x k21X(f (x(i) f (x )) k i 12tkConvergence analysis for backtrackingFor backtracking, it’s the same assumptions, f : Rn R is convex and differentiable, and f is Lipschitzcontinuous with constant L 0.But we don’t have to choose a step size that is small or equal to 1/L to begin with. We just get the samerate assuming that the function is Lipschitz.Theorem 5.2 Gradient descent with backtracking line search satisfiesf (x(k)kx(0) x k) f (x ) 2tmin k2 where tmin min{1, β/L}.So the gradient descent has convergence rate O(1/k). The constants are the same as there before, but sincet is adapted in each iteration, we replace t by tmin , where tmin min{1, β/L}.If β is not very tiny, then we don’t lose much compared to fixed step size (β/L vs 1/L).The proof is very similar to the proof of fixed step theorem.

5-7Lecture 5: Gradient Desent Revisited5.2.3Convergence analysis for strong convexityThere is also a statement of convergence on strong convexity. Strong convexity is a condition that thesmallest eigenvalue of the Hessian matrix of function f is uniformly bounded for any x, which means forsome d 0, f (x) dI, xThen the function has a better lower bound than that from usual convexity:d2Tf (y) f (x) f (x) (y x) ky xk , x, y2The strong convexity adds a quadratic term and still has a lower bound. If a function has both strongconvexity and Lipschitz assumption, it has both lower and upper bound by quadratics. We will have somestrong things about it since the function is well behaved.Theorem 5.3 Gradient descent with fixed step size t 2/(d L) or with backtracking line search satisfies2Lf (x(k) ) f (x ) ck kx(0) x k2where 0 c 1.The proof is on the textbook.Under strong convextiy and Lipschitz assumption, we have a theorem that it goes better than 1/k and therate is O(ck ), which is exponentially fast. It is called linear convergence, because if we plot iterations on thex-axis, and we plot difference in the function values on the y-axis on a log scale, it looks like a linear straightline. If we want f (x(k) f (x ) , we need O(log(1/ )) iterations.The constant c depends adversely on condition number L/d. If the condtion number is very high, that is aslower rate.5.2.4How realistic are these conditions?How realistic is Lipschitz continuity of f ? This means 2 f (x) LI.For example, consider linear regressionf (x) 12ky Axk2Then f (x) AT (y Ax)2 2 f (x) AT A2Take L σmax(A) kAk , then 2 f (x) AT A LI. f Lipschitz with L. Then we can choose a fixedstep size that is smaller than 1/L or use backtracking search to get a converge rate of O(1/k).How realistic is strong convexity of f ? Recall this is 2 f (x) dI.That is not easily realistic. Again considerf (x) 12ky Axk2

5-8Lecture 5: Gradient Desent Revisited2(A).Now we need d σminIf A is wide, then σmin (A) 0, and f can’t be strongly convex.Even if σmin (A) 0, we can still have a very large condition number L/d σmax (A)/σmin (A).5.3Pracalities5.3.1Stopping ruleWe can basicly stop when the gradient k f (x)k is small. It is reasonable because f (x ) 0. If k f (x)kis small, we think that f (x) is close to the minimum f (x ).If f is strongly convex with parameter d, thenk f (x)k 5.3.2 2d f (x) f (x ) Pros and consPros: It is a simple idea, and each iteration is cheap. It is very fast for well-conditioned, strongly convex problems.Cons: It is often slow, because interesting problems aren’t strongly convex or well-conditioned. It can’t handle nondifferentiable functions.5.4Forward stagewise regression5.4.1Forward stagewise regressionLet’s go back to the linear regression functionf (x) 12ky Axk2A is n p, its columns A1 , . . . , Ap are predictor variables.Forward stagewise regression is the algorithm below:Start with x(0) 0, repeatFind variable i such that ATi r is largest, for r y Ax(k 1) (largest absolute correlation with residual)(k)(k 1)Update xi xi γ · sign(ATi r)

5-9Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedHere γ 0 is small and fixed, called learning rate.In each iteration, forward stagewise regression just updates one of the variables in x with a small rate γ.5.4.2Steepest descentIt is a close cousin to gradient descent and just change the choice of norm.Let’s suppose q, r are complementary: 1/q 1/r 1.Steepest descent just update x x t · x, where x kukr · uTu argmin f (x) vkvkq 1If q 2, then x f (x), which is exactly gradient descent.If q 1, then x f (x)/ xi · ei , where f f(x) max(x) k f (x)k j 1,.,n xj xiThe normalized steepest descent just takes x u (unit q-norm).5.4.3EquivalenceNormalized steepest descent with 1-norm: updates arex i xi t · sign f(x) xiwhere i is the largest component of f (x) in absolute value.Compare forward stagewise: updates areTx i xi γ · sign(Ai r), r y AxRecall here f (x) ATi (y Ax), so f(x) ATi (y Ax) xiForward stagewise regression is exactly normalized steepest descent under 1-norm.5.4.4Early stopping and regularizationForward stagewise is like a slower version of forward stepwise. If we stop early, i.e.m don’t continue allthe way to the least squares solution, then we get a sparese approximation. Can this be used as a form ofregularization?

5-10Lecture 5: Gradient Desent RevisitedRecall lasso problem:minkxk1 t1ky Axk22Solution x (t), as function of t, also exhibits varying amounts of regularization.For some problems (some y, A), with a small enough step size, forward stagewise iterates trace out lassosolution path.

5.4.2 Steepest descent It is a close cousin to gradient descent and just change the choice of norm. Let’s suppose q;rare complementary: 1 q 1 r 1. Steepest descent just update x x t x, where x kuk r u u argmin kvk q 1 rf(x)T v If q 2, then x r f(x), which is exactly gradient descent.

Related Documents:

4 Blastmaster 725 Cu. Ft. Abrasive Storage Hopper PART NUMBERS BLASTMASTER 725 CU. FT. ABRASIVE STORAGE HOPPER* Part Numbers Capacity Caged Ladder Clean-Out Port Guardrail System Rain Guards Painted F.O.B. Point 10HOPPER725P 725 Cu. Ft. X 4" X X Yes – Red Deer Park, TX 15HOPPER725P 725 Cu. Ft. X 4"

Sketching an LP max 2x 3y s.t. x y 4 2x 5y 12 x 2y 5 x, y 0 6. Geoff Gordon—10-725 Optimization—Fall 2012 Did the prof get it right? 7. Geoff Gordon—10-725 Optimization—Fall 2012 . 20 if std fm has n vars, m eqns then ineq form has n-m vars and m (n-m) n ineqs

Jared Jewelers 5,000 6,000 Jewelry Scott Riddles/Trace Rouda 949 725 8432 OC, IE, Central Valley Javier's Finest Foods of Mexico 8,000 10,000 Restaurant James Crocenzi 949 725 8605 U.S. Jenny Craig 1,300 1,800 Health & Fitness Rob Crumly/Trace Rouda 949 725 8402/ 949 725 8461 Southern California

Since the eld { also referred to as black-box optimization, gradient-free optimization, optimization without derivatives, simulation-based optimization and zeroth-order optimization { is now far too expansive for a single survey, we focus on methods for local optimization of continuous-valued, single-objective problems.

45678 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 F 54321 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 A-76543 CS-101 1 Fall 2009 A CS-347 1 Fall 2009 Taylor 3128 C 00128 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A-12345 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 23856 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 54321 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 76543 CS-347 1 Fall 2009 A 10.7 Answer: a. Everytime a record is

Two-Year Calendar 7 Planning Calendars SCampus 2011-12 January 2012 May 2012 September 2012 February 2012 June 2012 October 2012 March 2012 July 2012 November 2012 April 2012 August 2012 December 2012 S M T W T F S

Structure topology optimization design is a complex multi-standard, multi-disciplinary optimization theory, which can be divided into three category Sizing optimization, Shape optimization and material selection, Topology optimization according to the structura

An approach for the combined topology, shape and sizing optimization of profile cross-sections is the method of Graph and Heuristic Based Topology Optimization (GHT) [4], which separates the optimization problem into an outer optimization loop for the topology modification and an inner optimization loo