Structural Technical Report 1Structural Concept / Structural Existing Conditions ReportPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, NorwayJames WilsonStructural OptionAE 481W Senior ThesisThe Pennsylvania State UniversityFaculty Consultant: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/08Table of ContentsExecutive Summary .21. Structural Discussion .31.1 Introduction . 31.2 Floor and Roof System of the Superstructure . 41.3 Superstructure Columns . 51.4 Lateral System . 61.5 Substructure . 71.6 Foundation . 71.7 The Grand Entrance.82. Design Codes.92.1 Norwegian Standards Used in Original Design. 92.2 Codes and Reference Standards used in Senior Thesis . 103. Materials .113.1 Steel . 113.2 Concrete . 124. Gravity and Lateral Loads .134.1 Dead . 134.2 Live. 144.3 Wind . 154.4 Seismic . 165. Spot Checks .185.1 Beam. 185.2 Column . 18Appendix .19A1 Wind Loads . 19A2 Seismic Loads . 22A3 Snow Loads . 26A4 Beam Spot Check . 27A5 Column Spot Check . 321
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/08Executive SummaryThe purpose of this report is to assess the existing conditions of thePricewaterhouseCoopers building and to gain an understanding of the procedures used inits structural design. It encompasses a structural discussion, code overview, materialsummary, determination of design loads and spot checks.The design codes used by the structural engineer to determine loads on thestructure are Norwegian Standards. As the Eurocodes will be implemented across Europewithin the next couple of years, this technical report makes an attempt to follow theEurocodes when possible. However, with limited guidance on procedures alternativecodes have additionally been used. Lateral loads have been determined in accordancewith ASCE 07 and spot checks follow LRFD provisions.An effort has been made to summarize the properties of the materials used in thebuilding as well as their designations in accordance with various standards.The gravity loads on the structure were found to be directly in accordance withthe Eurocodes. Lateral loads were calculated to be greater than those determined bydesign engineer and needs further review. Reasons for the discrepancies could bedifferences in design codes, reference location and assumptions as well as errors inmanual calculation.A spot check of one column and one beam indicates the members of the structureare adequate to carry design loads. The reason for the calculated member capacities beingconsiderably larger than the loads is most likely due to simplifying assumptions made incalculations.2
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/081 - Structural Discussion1.1 IntroductionThe superstructure of the PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) building consists ofconcrete plank decking on steel frame with cast in place concrete cores. Along theexterior of the building the concrete planks typically rest on HSQ profile beams, whilealong the interior they rest on steel angles connected to the concrete core. The exteriorsteel beams are supported by circular steel columns filled with reinforced concrete. Agrand opening at the center of the facade is allowed through the use of three steel trusses.To provide lateral resistance there are concrete cores located centrally in each leg of thebuilding. The cores are integrated into substructure which is comprised of cast in placeconcrete. The foundation uses steel and concrete piles driven between 30 and 40m tobedrock.Figure 1. Building SectionWSNEFigure 2. Typical framing plan for floors 1 – 43
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/081.2 Floor and Roof System of the SuperstructureThe floor and roof system of the superstructure is precast hollow core concrete plank onsteel framing. The concrete planks are HD265’s and have approximate sectiondimensions of 1.2m x 0.3m (figure 3). Spans range from 5m to 10m and are run in theEast-West direction. Due to the buildings shape, edges of some of the planks are cut at anangle.Figure 3: HD 265 elementAlong the exterior of the building the concrete planks typically rest on HSQ profilebeams. The beams are welded steel shapes fabricated by prefabrication engineer,Contiga. Connections between beams and deck elements are made with cast in placeconcrete containing stirrups that loop around shear tabs on the beams (figure 5). Beamswith concrete elements on either side, have steel reinforcing bars that span across the topof the beam and between element joints (figure 5).Figure 4: Principle connection of deck elementsto one sided HSQ beam.Figure 5: Principle connection of deck elementsto two sided HSQ beam.4
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/08Interior planks typically rest on steel L150x15 steel angles (figure 6). The angles arewelded to steel plates at the top and the bottom with 5mm fillet welds. The plates containsteel tabs that are cast into the concrete core. Beams are similarly connected to theconcrete wall using steel angles and plates with steel tabs (figure7)Figure 6: Principle connection of deck elementto concrete wallFigure 7: principle connection of steel beam toto concrete wallFigure 4,5,6, and 7 are from report Hulldeker på Stål bæresystem provided by Norsk Stålforbund andBetongelement Foreningen.1.3 Superstructure ColumnsHollow circular steel columns filled with reinforced concrete support the beams along theexterior of the building. They have typical spacing of 7.2 m and sizes ranging fromØ406.4mm x 8mm at level 1 to Ø323.9 x 6.3 at level 12. At the base of the buildingcolumns are connected at to steel plates with 6mm fillet welds (figure 9)Figure 8: Placing hollow steel columnon steel base plateFigure 9: Welding column to steel plate5
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/08Figure10: Typical column cross sectionAccording to Design guide for concrete filled columns by Corus UK limited, advantagesto concrete filled structural hollow sections are: They provide architects and engineers with a robust and inherently fire resistantcolumn.During construction the steel sections dispenses with the need for formwork anderection schedule is not depended on concrete curing time.During finishing concrete, filling is protected against mechanical damage.When completed, columns provide greater usable floor area, higher visibility,reduced maintenance, and are aesthetically pleasing1.4 Lateral SystemLateral resistance is provided by cast in place concrete cores, located at the center of eachleg of the building. Concrete plank decking acts as a rigid diaphragm that transfers loadsto the shear walls. The building is tall and narrow in the short direction and thereforerequires thick shear walls. Walls are typically 400mm thick in the short direction and300mm in the long direction. The narrow building shape also causes large overturningmoments. Cores are integrated into the cast in place concrete substructure and acts as abase to distribute the overturning moments to the foundation.Figure11: Plan showing location of shear walls6
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/081.5 SubstructureThere are two stories below grade comprised of cast in place concrete. The slab atthe lowest level is 500mm thick with recessed areas for elevator shafts. Floor slabs are300mm thick except in the areas that are below outdoor areas where slab thickness hasbeen increased to 400mm.1.6 Foundation:The foundation uses steel and concrete piles to transfer axial tension, axialcompression and lateral loads to the ground. There are five different types of piles usedwhich are driven between 30 and 40m into bedrock. Pile capacities are dependent on piletype, connection type, and whether bending is about strong or weak axis.VERTICAL STEEL CORE PILEWITH TENSION AND COMPRESSIONVERTICAL STEEL CORE PILEWITH COMPRESSIONANGLED STEEL CORE PILEWITH TENSION AND COMPRESSIONFigure12: Typical pile typesANGLED STEEL CORE PILEWITH TENSION AND COMPRESSIONANGLED STEEL CORE PILEWITH TENSION AND COMPRESSIONThe barcode strip is being built in sections. This meant that the PwC building stoodcomplete before the next building to the west had begun. Therefore uneven loads fromground pressure to the west were accounted for in the design.Figure13: Image showing building to the westbeing erected after the PWC (to the left is complete)Figure14: Excavated Barcode site7
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/081.6 The Grand EntranceThe grand opening at the center of the façade is created by using three trusses comprisedof hollow circular steel tubing for diagonal/vertical members and HSQ profiles forhorizontal members (Figure 15,16,17). During construction the structure was supportedby three temporary columns that were removed after the integrity of the truss was intact.45Level 8Ø323.9x6.3Level 7Ø273x16Ø273x16Level 6Level 5HSQ 56 exteriorHSQ 03 interiorHSQ 56 exteriorHSQ 03 interiorFigure 15: Truss ElevationFigure 16: Truss PlanFigure 17: Truss Images8
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/082 - Design codes2.1 Norwegian Standards Used in Original Design: NS 3472, 3. edition September 2001: Prosjektering av stålkonstruksjoner.Beregning og dimensjonering. - Design of steel structuresNS 3473, 6. edition September 2003: Prosjektering av betongkonstruksjoner.Beregnings- og konstruksjonsregler. - Design of conctete structuresNS 3490, 2. edition December 2004: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner. Krav tilpålitelighet. - Basis of structural designNS 3491-1, 1. edition December 1998: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 1: Egenlaster og nyttelaster. - general actions- Densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildingsNS 3491-3, 1. edition March 2001: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 3: Snølaster. – action on structures, snowloadsNS 3491-4, 1. edition May 2002: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 4: Vindlaster. – action on structures, windloadsNS 3491-5, 1. edition June 2003: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 5: Termiske påvirkninger.NS 3491-7, 1. edition November 2000: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 7: Ulykkeslaster. – action on structures,accidental actionsNS 3491-12, 1. edition December 2004: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 12: Laster fra seismiske påkjenninger. action on structures, seismic loads9
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/082.2 Codes and Reference Standards used in Senior Thesis:In the past Norway has operated using national design standards. As part of aneffort to decrease trade barriers between EU countries the Eurocodes have beendeveloped, which are unified design codes for buildings and civil engineering works forall of Europe. Norway is currently in the transition period where National and Eurocodescoexist. The Norwegian versions of the Eurocodes and the national annexes are stillunder production and aim to be completed by 2009. According to the time schedule thetransition will period last from year 2008 – 2010, after which national standards will bewithdrawn.This Senior Thesis will make an attempt to use the Eurocodes for design purposeswhen possible. However, with limited guidance on procedures alternative design codesand standards may be used. Below are the reference standards that will be used forSenior Thesis.2.2.1 Eurocodes: NS-EN 1990: 2002 NA:2008 Eurocode 1:Basis of structural designNS-EN 1991-1-1: 2002 Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-1: Generalactions – Densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildingsNS-EN 1991-1-3: 2003 Eurocode 1: Action on structures – Part 1-3: Generalactions – Snow loadsNS 3491-4, 1. edition May 2002: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner.Dimensjonerende laster. Del 4: Vindlaster. – action on structures, windloadsNS-EN 1992-1-1: 2004 Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1:General rules and rules for buildingsNS-EN 1993-1-1:2005 Eurocode 5 NA:2008: Design of steel structures – Part1-1: gereral rules for buildings.NS-EN 1993-1-8: 2005 Eurokode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-8: Designof jointsNS-EN 1998:2004 NA:2008:Eurocode 8 – Design of structures for earthquakeresistance – Part1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.2.2.2 Alternative Codes: ASCE 7 2005: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other StructuresIBC 2006: International Building Code10
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/083 - Materials3.1 SteelMetricItemFuFyEa(N/mm2) (N/mm2) (N/mm2)S355A572Gr50355510210 000S355A572Gr50355510210 000B500C500210 000HISAR460still need to determineVaItemEuronormASTMFu (ksi)Fy uronormASTM.3.3-Density(kg/m3)7 8507 850-ImperialEa(ksi)30 50030 50030 500.3.3-Notes1. Metric densities are converted to imperial form using 1 lb/ ft 157 kg/m32. Metric material strengths are converted to imperial form using 1 psi .006894 N/mm2.Values are rounded down to nearest whole number.11Density(Ib/ft3)5050-
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/083.2 ConcreteMetricItemCast in (N/mm2)3.23.83.8Ecm(N/mm2)33 50036 00036 i)4 8505 2225 222ImperialItemCast in placePrefabricatedColumnsfck - compressive cylinder strength at 28daysfctm - value of mean axial tensile strength of concreteEcm – Secant modulous of elasticityNotes1. Metric material strengths are converted to imperial form using 1psi .006894 N/mm2. Valuesare been rounded down to nearest whole number.12
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/084 Gravity and Lateral Loads4.1 Dead LoadsDead load calculations have been determined in accordance with EN 1991-1,2002. In each case the load determined by the codes matched that used by the designengineer. For purpose of providing a reference for future calculation, as well as review byadvisor, the unit weights are also shown in imperial form.Concrete DeckingLevelSlab on gradeDeck over K1 axis E-F/ 5-10Deck over K1 axis A-E/ 4-5Typical basement slabConcrete plankThickness(mm)ReferenceDensity(kN/m3)Unit Weight(kN/m2)500450400300-EN 1991-1 2002, Table A.1EN 1991-1 2002, Table A.1EN 1991-1 2002, Table A.1EN 1991-1 2002, Table A.1Contiga website - SD 26525252525-12.511.3107.53.7Floor, Ceiling, Partitions, M.E.P.LevelK2K11st floor2-12 floorRoofReferenceDesign ValueDesign ValueDesign ValueDesign ValueDesign ValueUnit Weight (kN/m2)11.511.50.5Unit Weight (psf)2132213111OtherItemFaçadeOutdoor terraceconcrete stepssteel stepsReferenceDesign ValueDesign ValueDesign Value1Design ValueUnit Weight (kN/m2)0.726.52.5Unit Weight (psf)154213752Notes1.2.Where “Design Value” has been listed under reference, the unit weight shown is that obtained bystructural design engineer. Architectural details of floor/roof/façade finishes were not providedprior to this technical report. Without that information accurate unit loads were difficult calculateand therefore found it more suitable to list design values.Metric unit weights have been converted to imperial form using 1psf .04784kN/m2. Values arerounded up to nearest whole number13UnitWeight(psf)26223721015774
Technical Report 1James Wilson - Structural OptionAdvisor: Prof. M. Kevin ParfittPricewaterhouseCoopersOslo, Norway9/29/084.2 Live LoadsLive load calculations have been determined according to the EN 1991-1, 2002and NS-EN 1991-1-3, 2003 In each case the load determined by the codes matched thatused by the design engineer.Imposed Floor LoadsAreaOffice spacesCafeteriaOutdoor terraceAuditoriumCorridorsTechnical RoomsArchives (stationary)Archives (On rollers)Outdoor "under opening"OutdoorReferenceCategoryEN 1991-1 2002, Table NA.6.2EN 1991-1 2002, Table NA.6.2EN 1991-1 2002, Table NA.6.2EN 1991-1 2002, Table NA.6.2EN 1991-1 2002, Table NA.
- Design of steel structures NS 3473, 6. edition September 2003: Prosjektering av betongkonstruksjoner. Beregnings- og konstruksjonsregler. - Design of conctete structures NS 3490, 2. edition December 2004: Prosjektering av konstruksjoner. Krav til pålitelighet. - Basis of structural design
2.1 Structural Health Monitoring Structural health monitoring is at the forefront of structural and materials research. Structural health monitoring systems enable inspectors and engineers to gather material data of structures and structural elements used for analysis. Ultrasonics can be applied to structural monitoring programs to obtain such .
Georgia Structural Pest Control Commission Georgia Structural Pest Control Commission Fiscal Year 2011 Report to Governor As required by O.C.G.A. 43-45-8 (3), the Georgia Structural Pest Control Commission submits the follow annual report. The Georgia Structural Pest Control Commission met monthly during Fiscal Year 2011 on the following dates:
Structural Insulated Panels? RAYCORE Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) are a unique, component structural insulated panel, RAY-CORE SIPs rely on integrated structural members or studs to provide the structural integrity of the building. Superiorly insulating hig
ELFINI STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS GENERATIVE PART STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS GENERATIVE ASSEMBLY STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS The ELFINI Structural Analysisproduct is a natural extensions of both above mentioned products, fully based on the v5 architecture. It represents the basis of all future mechanical analysis developments. ELFINI Structural Analysis CATIA v5 .
Structural geology and structural analysis 1 1.1 Approaching structural geology 2 1.2 Structural geology and tectonics 2 1.3 Structural data sets 4 1.4 Field data 5 1.5 Remote sensing and geodesy 8 1.6 DEM, GIS and Google Earth 10 1.7 Seismic data 10 1.8 Experimental data 14 1.9 Numerical modeling 15 1.10 Other data sources 15
Common Perspective: Structural Health Monitoring Technologies required to detect, isolate, and characterize structural damage (e.g., cracks, corrosion, FOD, battle damage). Typically synonymous with monitoring of airframe structural damage. SAC Perspective: Structural Health Management Holistic cradle-to-grave approach to ensure aircraft structural
structural technologies / vsl post-tensioning system. they were prepared in conformance with the structural design provided to structural technologies / vsl by project owner or it's representative. structural technologies / vsl took no part in the preparation or review of said structural design and structural
mandated a name change. All area vocational technical institutes be came technical institutes, but change did not end there. By 1989, the State Board of Technical Institutes became the State Board of Technical Colleges, so Thief River Falls Technical Institute became Thief River Falls Technical College, and more changes were coming.