Boeing Airplane Overview

3y ago
53 Views
7 Downloads
2.84 MB
44 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ciara Libby
Transcription

Boeing Airplane OverviewYonglian Ding, PEBoeing Airport Compatibility EngineeringNov 29, 2016BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company.Copyright 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.

Agenda Aircraft Growth Trends Long Term Market - Current Market Outlook(Boeing, 2016-2035) Boeing Airplane Overview B737 MAX B787 B777XCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Aircraft Growth TrendsCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Aircraft Growth Trend- Aircraft Wingspan787-10 and 777-8/-9/-10X data is preliminaryCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Aircraft Growth Trend- Aircraft Overall LengthNote – A380 is RFF Cat 10 due to fuselage width787-10 and 777-8/-9/-10X data is preliminaryCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Aircraft Growth Trend- Aircraft Max. Takeoff Weight vs. Wingspan787-10 and 777-8/-9 data is preliminaryCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Aircraft Growth Trend- Wingspan vs. Range787-10 and 777-8/-9 data is preliminaryCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Long Term MarketCurrent Market Outlook(Boeing, 2016-2035)COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

World FleetCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

New Aircraft Deliveries by RegionCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Latin-America RegionCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Latin-America RegionCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Boeing Airplane Overview B737MAX B787 B777-8/-9/-10XCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Boeing Commercial Product Lineup** Ray Conner’s presentation slide in Paris Air Show 2015, titled “BCA has most efficient, comprehensive lineup of worldclass products”COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

737 MAX Changes from 737-700/800/900ERThe 737 MAX are derivative aircraft of the 737-700/800/900ER, respectively.The 737 MAX 8 is scheduled to enter into service in the third quarter of 2017while 737 MAX 9 and 737 MAX 7 are planned to enter into service in 2018and 2019, respectively.Overall Length: SAME(Except MAX 7)ICAO Code Letter: SAMEICAO RFF Category: SAMEInterior layout: SAMECargo Capacity: SAMEGround Servicing: SAMEDoor Locations: SAMETurning (180o turn, fillet): SAMEDoor Sill Heights: SIMILAR (MAX Nose gear is lengthened by 8-in / 20-cm)Tires / Tire Pressure: SIMILARPavement Loading (ACN): SIMILARCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

737 MAX OverviewCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

737 MAX General ArrangementCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

737 MAX 8 General Arrangement* Static ground line condition, all gears approximately80% compressedCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

737 MAX Comparisons with 737NG737 MAX 7737-700withWinglet737 MAX 8737-800withWinglet117-10 /35.9117-5 /35.8117-10 /35.9117-5 /35.8117-10 /35.9117-5 /35.8- ICAO Code LetterCCCCCC- FAA Design GroupIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIOverall Length (ft-in/m)116-8 /35.6110-4 /33.6129-6 /39.5129-6 /39.5138-2 /42.1138-2 /42.1- ICAO RFF Category667777- FAA ARFF IndexBBCCCC181,700 /82,418174,700 /79,243195,200 /88,541188,200 /85,366Wing Span (ft-in/m)Max. Design TaxiWeight (lb/kg)COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY737-900ERwith737 MAX 9Winglet

Boeing Airplane Overview B737-7/-8/-9 B787 B777-8/-9/-10XCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Broad Market Coverage1,161 787-8/-9 orders from over 60 customers (142 -8 and 313 -9 deliveries)* As of June 27, 2013*Leasing As ofoperatorSeptember, 2016 *Leasing operatorCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

787 General CharacteristicsCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

787-10 General ArrangementFlight Test: Mid 2017Entry Into Service: Early 2018COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

787 Airplane 0FT/M197.3 / 60.1197.3 / 60.1197.3 / 60.1ICAO Code LetterEEEFAA Design GroupVVV186.1 / 56.7206.1 / 62.8224.1 / 68.3RFF Category (ICAO)899ARFF Index ,692Wing SpanOverall LengthMax Design Taxi WeightFT/M787-10 data is preliminaryCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Boeing Airplane Overview B737MAX B787 B777XCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-9 general arrangement777-300ER777-300ER(black) comparedto the 777-9The folded wing has the samewingspan as the 777-300ER71.8 m (235 ft 5 in)Code F (Group VI)64.8 m (212 ft 8 in)Code E (Group V)24.5 m(80 ft 7 in)19.7 m(64 ft 7 in)*8.41(27 ft 7 in)11.32 m(37 ft 2 in)10.8 m(35 ft 6 in)5.9 m(19 ft 4 in)32.3 m (106 ft 1 in)76.7 m (251 ft 9 in)* Estimate maximum tail height under normal loading conditionsDimensions shown are preliminary and may change during configuration developmentCopyright @ 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-9 compared to the 777-300ER Compared to the 777-300ER, the 777-9– Overall length is 2.9 m (9.4 ft) longer– Folded wingspan same, unfolded wingspan is 7 m (22.8 ft) wider– Horizontal stabilizer is 3.0 m (9.9 ft) wider– Wheelbase is 1.1 m (3.6 ft) longer– Distance from the nose to the nose landing gear remains the same– Engine to fuselage centerline is 1.0 m (3.3 ft) further outboard– Vertical tail max. height is 1.0 m ( 3.0 ft) higher– Main landing gear width is 0.2 m (6 in) narrowerCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-10X general arrangementProductDevelopmentStudy235 ft 5 in (71.8 m)212 ft 8 in (64.8 m)80 ft 7 in(24.55 m)63 ft 10 in(19.47 m)35 ft 6 in(10.82 m)19 ft 4 in(5.89 m)114 ft 7 in (34.93 m)258 ft 0 in (78.6 m)263 ft 0 in (80.2 m)COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-10X compared to the 777-300ERProductDevelopmentStudy Compared to the 777-300ER, the 777-10X– Overall length is 6.3 m (20.7 ft) longer– Folded wingspan same, unfolded wingspan is 7 m (22.8 ft) wider– Horizontal stabilizer is 3.0 m (9.9 ft) wider– Wheelbase is 3.7 m (12.1 ft) longer– Distance from the nose to the nose landing gear remains the same– Engine to fuselage centerline is 1.0 m (3.3 ft) further outboard– Vertical tail max. height is 1.0 m ( 3.0 ft) higher– Main landing gear width is 0.2 m (6 in) narrowerCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-8 general arrangement777-200LR (black)compared to the777-8The folded wing has the samewingspan as the 777-200LR71.8 m (235 ft 5 in)Code F (Group VI)64.8 m (212 ft 8 in)Code E (Group V)24.5 m(80 ft 7 in)19.5 m(63 ft 11 in) *10.8 m(35 ft 6 in)5.9 m(19 ft 4 in)* Static airplane, does not account for changes due to loadingCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY28.6 m (93 ft 10 in)69.8 m (229 ft 0 in)PDX-CO-0372 R1 1-7-15-CG

ProductDevelopmentStudy777-8/-9/10X at today’s airports777-300ER(FT/M)Wing Span, Wing TipsExtendedICAO Code LetterN/AFAA Design Group777-10X(FT/M)777-9(FT/M)777-8(FT/M)235.4 / 71.8235.4 / 71.8235.4 / 71.8FFFVIVIVIWing Span, Wing TipsFolded212.8 / 64.8212.8 / 64.8212.8 / 64.8212.8 / 64.8ICAO Code LetterEEEEFAA Design GroupVVVV242.5 / 73.9263 / 80.2251.8 / 76.7229.0 / 69.8RFF Category (ICAO)910109ARFF Index (FAA)EEEEOverall LengthCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-8/-9/10X Airport CompatibilityProductDevelopmentStudyKey CharacteristicsWingspan Code FSolution – Folding Wing Tip (FWT) Airfield minimum separations / parkingLength - ParkingSolution – New ICAO wingtip separation standardchange (Effective 10 Nov 2016)Length/wheelbase: Maneuvering RFF (Rescue fire fighting) Runway hold line / obstacle surfaces /NAVIDS critical surfaces (consideredtogether with vertical tail height)Maintenance / De-icing FacilitiesPavement loadingETOPS airportsSolution - Work with airports worldwide to ensureairports are ready at EIS45m runway width (Code F aircraft require60m wide runway)Solution – Seek approval to operate on 45m widerunway (as was done for the 747-8)FWT ProceduresUnder DevelopmentHorizontal tail widthJet blastRamp servicingNot expected to be a major issue – work withairports as neededCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Determining where to extend – in workRequirements: Minimize the potential impacts toairport normal traffic flow Minimize impacts to paralleltaxiways (Code E vs. Code F)ICAODistance to HoldLine 71mNext Step: Make a case to ICAO / FAA toinitiate extend 1000 ft alongparallel taxiway prior to RW endFAA Fold/Extend command is linked to electronic checklist and alerting system Alerts prior to takeoff and after landing back up normal crew procedureCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANYDistance to HoldLine 119 ft

777-9 parking at a 777-300ER gate No requirement to down-size adjacent gate with FWT ICAO wingtip separation standard change (effective 10 Nov 2016) providesrelief at gates that do not have service road aft of the parking limit lineTaxiway to Object Code E SeparationOld ICAO Code E TaxiwayCenterline to Object SeparationWingtip Clearance – 15m47.543.5New ICAO Code E TaxiwayCenterline to Object SeparationWingtip Clearance – 11m *15.1Taxiway to Object and wingtipseparations shown in meters12.22.9777-9X PRELIMINARY777-300ER* EASA adopted same separations1/29/15 ED Decision 2015/001/R777-9 using same stopbar as 777-300ERCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY64.8

ProductDevelopmentStudy777-8/-9/-10X landing gear footprintMaximum Design Taxi WeightNose Gear Tire SizeNose Gear Tire PressureMain Gear Tire SizeMain Gear Tire PressureWheelbase (A)UNITS777-10XLB / KG794,000 / 360,152777-9777,000 / 352,441IN43 x 17.5 R17 (32PR)PSI / KG/CM2215 / 15.1IN52 x 21 R22 (38PR)PSI / KG/CM2229 / 16.2FT-IN / M142-7 / 34.9106-1 / 32.3MLG Truck Width (B)IN / mm55 / 140MLG Truck Length (C)IN / mm57.2 / 145MLG Track Length (D)IN / mm58.0 / 148MLG Maximum Width (E)FT-IN / M35-6 / 10.8MLG Maximum Tire Edge to Tire Edge width (F)FT-IN / M41-10 / 12.8COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY777-893-10 / 28.6

777-9/-10X180oturn capabilityProductDevelopmentStudy U-turn width can be reduced byusing differential braking and/orasymmetrical thrustMinimum width ofpavement747-400 787-10ICAO Airplane Design Code180o turn width (m) maxsteering angle 31747-8 Minimum widths are calculatedbased on data from availableairport planning manuals –values may vary duringoperations777-300ER 777-10X1777-9 1A340-600A380-800EEFEF/EF/EEF51m5152 m57 m63 m59 m57 m57 m1. Preliminary2. Boeing calculation using no differential braking, asymmetric thrust – current Airbus A380 planning manual value (50.91) includes differential brakingand asymmetric thrust3. Minimum widths do not take into account tire-edge clearance of 15 ft (4.5m) at both pavement edges, nor differential braking or asymmetrical thrust4. 777-8 turn width will be less than the 777-300ERCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY2

777-9/-10X fillet requirement is similar to 777-300ERModelTurn Center R 40m / 131ftICAOdesigncodeTire edge toturn 400E40.9Less CriticalProductDevelopmentStudy* Preliminary** Code E after exiting the runwayJudgmental Oversteering permits adequate tire edge clearance on most existing filletsCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-8/-9/-10X Pavement LoadingACN (Aircraft Classification Number) is similar to other wide body aircraft ** ACN is preliminary and can be expected to change during design and developmentCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANYProductDevelopmentStudy

777-8/-9 airports discussions150 destination and alternate airports, 32 CAA since 2012Dimensions shown are preliminary and may change during configuration developmentCopyright @ 2016 Boeing. All rights reserved.COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Summary of 777-8/-9 Airport / CAA Discussions FWT: Lots of interest and excitement; Code E capability with wings folded isvery much appreciated at non-Code F airports Parking: Folded wing considered a favorable gate solution Maneuvering (fillets, u-turns): current infrastructure is adequate at manyairports Topics requiring further discussion FWT: Fold/extend location and time, dual taxiway runway entrance, reliability and theimpact to a process developed for a non-normal configuration FWT Parking: Increased lengthMaintainability at a gate to correct a failed wing foldIncreased Door 2 to Nose distance, and proximity of Door 2 to EngineCombination of Jet Bridge Connectivity, Fuel Pit Connectivity MISC: ETOPS airports, higher RFF category, de-icing/Anti-icingCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

777-9/-10X and ICAO RFF(Rescue and Fire Fighting)ProductDevelopmentStudyDiscussion ICAO Annex 14 defines RFF category based on aircraft length andfuselage width 777-300ER is RFF Category 9, 777-9 and -10X is Category 10 (sameas the 747-8 [length] and the A380 [fuselage diameter]) ICAO Annex 14 states that in the busiest three consecutive months,when it is expected that the number of Category 10 takeoffs andlandings at the airport are less than 700, the airport can adopt RFFCategory 9 ICAO Annex 6 provides the standards and recommended practices(SARPs) for air carrier operations:– Remission of two categories for alternates– Minimum RFF Cat 4 for ETOPS en-route airports Minimum usable amounts of extinguishing agents (volume of water,weight of chemical) higher for Cat 10; no change to required dischargerate or number of vehicles to go from Cat 9 to Cat 10COPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Airport Design Document Updates ICAO ADWG/TF (Aerodrome Design Working Group special taskforce) is reviewing ANNEX 14 Chapter 3. Items of interest to 777X: The ARC (Aerodrome Reference Code) Runway and runway shoulder width, taxiway and taxiway shoulder width RW strip (which impacts RW-TW separation) EASA/TF, similar to the ADWG/TV. In addition to the items above,EASA may review RFF ICAO IFPP (Instrument Flight Procedures Panel) CRM (Collision RiskModel): Approved Circular 345, an update to Circular 301 pertainingto Code F aircraft operating in Code E OFZ (Obstacle Free Zone);final English version by end of 2016 Adding FWT to Annex 14, PANS Aerodromes Initiated discussion with the FAA on extending the wingtips while at theend of parallel taxiway, before entering taxiway at runway endCOPYRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

Please visit the Boeing Airport Compatibility Engineering website at:www.boeing.com/airportsOr contact:Yonglian Ding, PEBoeing Airport Compatibility YRIGHT 2016 THE BOEING COMPANY

BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company.Copyright 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved.

The 737 MAX are derivative aircraft of the 737-700/800/900ER, respectively. The 737 MAX 8 is scheduled to enter into service in the third quarter of 2017 while 737 MAX 9 and 737 MAX 7 are planned to enter into service in 2018

Related Documents:

To the Stockholders of Boeing Airplane Company: The Annual Report for the year 1945 covering the operations of Boeing Airplane Company and its subsidiary companies is sub mitted herewith. BOEING'S WAR RECORD . The past year has seen the successful completion by Boeing of a most difficult and comprehensive war production program. The

As a result Boeing Airplane Company is a center of intensive activity and of special responsibility. The outstanding position which this Company and its sub sidiaries occupy in the United Nations' war effort is evidenced . Boeing Airplane Company Annual Reports: 1934-1935, 1937-1978 .

BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANES PERSPECTIVE AERO Third-Quarter 2003—July In January 2003, Mike Cave was named senior vice president of Boeing Commercial Aviation Services. Cave previously served as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. He replaced Mike Bair, who now leads the Boeing 7E7 program.

Vice President-Investor Relations, The Boeing Co. Thank you, John. Good morning. Welcome to Boeing's Fourth Quarter 2020 Earnings Call. I'm Maurita Sutedja, and with me today are Dave Calhoun, Boeing's President and Chief Executive Officer; and Greg Smith, Boeing's Executive Vice Presid

Airbus A320, Airbus A330, Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, Boeing 737, Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing F/A-18 Super Hornet, Boeing T-7A Red Hawk, Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Sikorsky S-70A Black Hawk See also: Smith Equipment Columbia Research Laboratories Inc (U.S.A.) 1925 Mac Dade Blvd,

received by Boeing deal with commercial tools and equipment in Boeing amms, the same questions and resolutions can be applied to commercial tools and equipment in component maintenance manuals (cmms), Boeing fault isolation manuals, and the Boeing standard wiring practices manual. Standard tools are those not normally

18 Boeing 737-600, -700,-800 Bite Manual Boeing Commercial Airplane Group : Jun 10, 1999 : 1 ; 19 Boeing 737-600/-700/-800 Component Locator Guide : Undated : 1 ; 20 Boeing 737-823American Airlines Flight Training Development, GSWFA-DH Diagram : May 14, 1999 : 3

during the Boeing 787 (B787) certification process and further ensure the airplane meets the intended level of safety. On January 31, 2013, the FAA and Boeing jointly formed the B787 Critical Systems Review Team (CSRT) to conduct a comprehensive review of the B787’s critical systems, including the airplane’s design, manufacture, and assembly,