Programs And Projects Committee Meeting Agenda Monday .
Programs and Projects Committee Meeting AgendaMonday, September 13, 2021, 10:00 a.m.Due to the statewide stay at home order and the Alameda County Shelter in PlaceOrder, and pursuant to the Executive Order issued by Governor Gavin Newsom(Executive Order N-08-21), the Commission will not be convening at itsCommission Room but will instead move to a remote meeting.Members of the public wishing to submit a public comment may do so byemailing the Clerk of the Commission at vlee@alamedactc.org by 5:00 p.m. theday before the scheduled meeting. Submitted comments will be read aloud to theCommission and those listening telephonically or electronically; if the commentsare more than three minutes in length the comments will be summarized.Members of the public may also make comments during the meeting by usingZoom's “Raise Hand” feature on their phone, tablet or other device during therelevant agenda item, and waiting to be recognized by the Chair. If calling intothe meeting from a telephone, you can use “Star (*) 9” to raise/ lower your hand.Comments will generally be limited to three minutes in length, or as specified bythe Chair.Committee Chair:Carol Dutra-Vernaci, City of Union CityExecutive DirectorTess LengyelVice Chair:Rebecca Saltzman, BARTStaff Liaison:Gary HuisinghMembers:Jen Cavenaugh, David Haubert, Lily Mei,Nate Miley, Sheng Thao, Richard Valle,Bob WoernerClerk of the Commission:Vanessa LeeEx-Officio:Pauline Russo Cutter, John BautersLocation web.zoom.us/j/85905798808?pwd Sk9NV2VGWk5LeGE4cCs3UCsyelVnZz09For PublicAccessDial-inInformation:(669) 900-6833Webinar ID: 859 0579 8808Password: 423167Webinar ID: 859 0579 8808Password: 423167To request accommodation or assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Vanessa Lee, the Clerk ofthe Commission, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting date at: vlee@alamedactc.org1. Call to Order2. Roll Call
3. Public Comment4. Consent CalendarPage/Action4.1. Approve July 12, 2021 PPC Meeting Minutes1A4.2. Approve the Administrative Amendments to Various Agreements toExtend Agreement Expiration Dates7A5.1. Approve the 2022 State Transportation Improvement Program Programming Principles and Schedule13A5.2. Approve actions associated with allocation of Regional Measure 2funds for Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority’s SharedAutonomous Vehicle Phase 2 Deployment21A5.3. Award Project Approval and Environmental Document Phase Contractfor the State Route 262 (Mission Boulevard) Cross Connector Project67A5. Regular Matters6. Committee Member Reports7. Staff Reports8. AdjournmentNext Meeting: Monday, October 11, 2021Notes: All items on the agenda are subject to action and/or change by the Commission. To comment on an item not on the agenda (3-minute limit), submit a speaker card to the clerk. Call 510.208.7450 (Voice) or 1.800.855.7100 (TTY) five days in advance to request a sign-language interpreter. If information is needed in another language, contact 510.208.7400. Hard copies available only by request. Call 510.208.7400 48 hours in advance to request accommodation or assistance at this meeting. Meeting agendas and staff reports are available on the website calendar. Alameda CTC is located near 12th St. Oakland City Center BART station and AC Transit bus lines.Directions and parking information are available online.
Commission ChairMayor Pauline Russo CutterCity of San LeandroCommission Vice ChairCouncilmember John BautersCity of EmeryvilleAlameda CTC Schedule of Upcoming MeetingsSeptember and October 2021Commission and Committee MeetingsTimeDescriptionDate2:00 p.m.Alameda CTC Commission MeetingSeptember 23, 2021October 28, 2021Alameda CountySupervisor David Haubert, District 1Supervisor Richard Valle, District 2Supervisor Wilma Chan, District 3Supervisor Nate Miley, District 4Supervisor Keith Carson, District 59:00 a.m.Multi-Modal Committee (MMC)10:00 a.m.Programs and Projects Committee(PPC)BARTVice President Rebecca Saltzman11:30 a.m.Planning, Policy and LegislationCommittee (PPLC)4:00 p.m.Alameda CTC Audit CommitteeAC TransitBoard President Elsa OrtizCity of AlamedaMayor Marilyn Ezzy AshcraftCity of AlbanyCouncilmember Rochelle NasonCity of BerkeleyCouncilmember Lori DrosteCity of HaywardMayor Barbara HallidayCity of LivermoreMayor Bob WoernerCity of NewarkCouncilmember Luis FreitasCity of OaklandCouncilmember At-LargeRebecca KaplanCouncilmember Sheng ThaoCity of PiedmontCouncilmember Jen CavenaughCity of PleasantonMayor Karla BrownCity of Union CityMayor Carol Dutra-VernaciExecutive DirectorTess LengyelOctober 28, 2021Advisory Committee Meetings1:30 p.m.Alameda County TechnicalAdvisory Committee (ACTAC)September 9, 2021October 7, 20219:30 a.m.Paratransit Technical AdvisoryCommittee (ParaTAC)September 14, 20215:30 p.m.Bicycle and Pedestrian AdvisoryCommittee (BPAC)October 21, 20211:30 p.m.Paratransit Advisory and PlanningCommittee (PAPCO)October 25, 2021City of DublinMayor Melissa HernandezCity of FremontMayor Lily MeiOctober 11, 2021Due to the statewide stay at home order and the Alameda County Shelterin Place Order, and pursuant to the Executive Order issued by GovernorGavin Newsom (Executive Order N-29-20), the Commission will not beconvening at its Commission Room but will instead move to a remotemeeting.Meeting materials, directions and parking information are all available onthe Alameda CTC website. Meetings subject to change.
This page intentionally left blank
Programs and Projects CommitteeMeeting MinutesMonday, July 12, 2021, 10:00 a.m.4.11. Call to Order2. Roll CallA roll call was conducted. All members were present with the exception ofCommissioner Valle.3. Public CommentThere were no public comments.4. Consent Calendar4.1. Approve June 14, 2021 PPC Meeting MinutesCommissioner Haubert moved to approve the consent calendar. Commissioner Meiseconded the motion. The motion passed with the following roll call vote:Yes:Bauters, Cavenaugh, Cutter, Dutra-Vernaci, Haubert, Mei, Miley,Saltzman, Thao, WoernerNo:NoneAbstain: NoneAbsent: Valle5. Regular Matters5.1. Approve the 2022 Comprehensive Investment PlanTess Lengyel, Executive Director, introduced Vivek Bhat to present this item. Mr. Bhatrecommended the Commission approve the 2022 Comprehensive Investment Plan(CIP), which included incorporating the following: 54.7M in previously approved programming actions occurring after thecurrent 2020 CIP Update was approved (May 28, 2020) 53.2M in new programming and allocation recommendations consisting ofMeasure B, Measure BB, Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), Transportation Fundfor Clean Air (TFCA), and MTC’s Safe and Seamless Quick-Strike Programfunds 35.4M in allocations of previously programmed fundsTechnical CIP adjustments including reprogramming, deprogramming, anddocumenting exchanges.Authorize Executive Director or designee to execute Project FundingAgreements related to CIP allocation recommendations.Mr. Bhat outlined the 2022 Comprehensive Investment Plan (CIP) which serves as adocument for programming and allocation of Alameda CTC administered funds.The goal of the CIP is to advance countywide vision and goals, improve projectdelivery, and strategically program Alameda CTC’s administered funds for maximumPage 1
returns of the County’s investments. Mr. Bhat noted that the final 2022 CIP included 141.6M in programming for FYs 2021-22 through 2025-26, with 107.7 in allocationsduring the first two years of the CIP.Commissioner Mei moved to approve this item. Commissioner Cavenaughseconded the motion. The motion passed with the following roll call vote:Yes:Bauters, Cavenaugh, Cutter, Dutra-Vernaci, Haubert, Mei, Miley,Saltzman, Thao, WoernerNo:NoneAbstain: NoneAbsent: Valle5.2. Approve actions necessary to facilitate project advancement into the constructionphase for the I-680 Southbound Express Lanes from SR-84 to Alcosta BoulevardProjectTess Lengyel stated that Alameda CTC was the first agency in Northern California todeliver Express Lanes on the I-680 corridor and subsequently on the I-580 corridor. Theproposed project closes a nine-mile express lane gap on I-680 Southbound from SR84 to Alcosta Boulevard. The project hads almost completed design and staff isseeking approval from the Commission to close the remaining funding gap in orderto move the project into the construction phase. Ms. Lengyel introduced Vivek Bhatto present this item.Mr. Bhat recommended the Commission approve the following actions related tothe I-680 Southbound Express Lanes from SR-84 to Alcosta Boulevard Project: Approve Resolution 21-013 and Regional Measure 3 Initial Project Report(RM3-IPR) (Attachment A) to request Metropolitan Transportation Commission(MTC) allocation of 80 million RM3 funds for the Construction (CON) phasethrough a Letter of No Prejudice (LONP);Approve final project funding of 66.4 million;Authorize the Executive Director or designee to enter into all necessaryagreements including a Cooperative Agreement with the CaliforniaDepartment of Transportation (Caltrans).Mr. Bhat stated that the project is ready to move into the construction phase. Thedelivery of the project is being coordinated with an upcoming Caltrans pavementrehab project along the same section of I-680. The coordination of these twoprojects will lead to a significant cost savings of approximately 18 million, whilereducing impact for the traveling public during the time of construction.Commissioner Saltzman asked if there is an update on the resolving RM3 litigation.Ms. Lengyel shared that although there was no known timeline, MTC was hoping fora resolution by the end of 2021. Commissioner Saltzman also inquired whether theagency had an alternative plan in place in the event that the RM3 funding were notavailable. Ms. Lengyel stated contingency plans have been drafted and in theevent RM3 funds are not made available, staff would bring back an alternatePage 2
funding proposal that could include a combination of eligible state, regional andlocal funding sources to be proposed towards the Project.Commissioner Dutra-Vernaci inquired if the loan of 66.4 would impact any of theother projects on the newly approved CIP. Ms. Lengyel confirmed that the loanwould not have any impact on the CIP projects and would be paid back directlyfrom the I-680 Express Lanes revenue.Commissioner Woerner moved to approve the item. Commissioner Haubertseconded the motion. The motion passed with the following roll call vote:Yes:Bauters, Cavenaugh, Cutter, Dutra-Vernaci, Haubert, Mei, Miley,Saltzman, Thao, WoernerNo:NoneAbstain: NoneAbsent: Valle5.3. Approve actions necessary to facilitate toll system integration services for the I-680Sunol Express Lanes Project (Phase 1) and I-680 Southbound Express Lane from SR 84to Alcosta Boulevard ProjectMs. Lengyel stated that the project, which focuses on the system integrator for theExpress Lanes, will require the buildout of an interim toll operating system and therelease of an RFP for system integration services for the entire of I-680 corridor withinAlameda County (including the Gap Project from item 5.2), as well the inclusion ofoperations and maintenance. She introduced Liz Rutman to present this item.Ms. Rutman provided an overview of the project, including an update on the statusof the I-680 Sunol Express Lanes Project for which both directions are currently openonly to carpoolers. Kapsch TrafficCom USA Inc was originally awarded the contractto design and develop the new toll system; however, their contract was terminatedin June 2021. Ms. Rutman recommended that the Commission approve the followingitems: Authorize the Executive Director to execute a sole source agreement withElectronic Transaction Consultants, LLC (ETC) for a not-to-exceed amount of 4.5 million to design and deploy an interim toll system for the I-680 Sunol ELProject;Approve inclusion of Toll System Integrator (TSI) Services for the I-680 Sunol ELProject in the previously authorized Request for Proposals (RFP) for TSI servicesfor the I-680 Southbound Gap Project;Approve inclusion of Electronic Toll System Operations and Maintenance(O&M) Services in the RFP for TSI services for both the I-680 Sunol EL and I-680Southbound Gap EL.Commissioner Cutter asked if staff is seeing cars with multiple riders or if the users ofthe lanes are primarily single occupancy vehicles. Ms. Lengyel stated thatcarpooling has decreased due to the COVID-19 pandemic. There is general traveltime reliability for both the carpool and general lanes.Page 3
Commissioner Cutter noted that users of the lane have the ability to identify thenumber of passengers in the car via the Fastrak Flex Tag and questioned if that datacan help indicate if more people are carpooling. Ms. Lengyel confirmed thatreports on operations of the Express Lanes are brought to the Commission and. Ms.Rutman stated that the information is also brought to the Multi-Modal Committee.Commissioner Cutter asked for clarification of whether the Express Lanes will bemeans based. Ms. Rutman confirmed that vehicles meeting the carpool occupancyrequirements will not be charged.Commissioner Woerner asked if the agency had modified its contracting termsconsidering the experience with the contract termination for the toll system. Ms.Lengyel confirmed that the contract terms have been modified.Commissioner Woerner asked how much of the interim solution will go toward thefinal solution. Liz Rutman responded that while the information is proprietary, some ofthe hardware can be leveraged for the new system. She did specify that thisdepends on the preferred hardware of the system integrator, as replacing theequipment can be more cost effective than using an unfamiliar hardware.Commissioner Woerner asked whether delaying the interim solution, in favor ofcombining the contract with the final system integrator would be a better option inthe long run. Ms. Lengyel emphasized that the goal is to get the Express Lanes upand running as soon as possible and the RFP process is not expected to becompleted until next summer. She reiterated that the interim system should beoperational and begin generating revenue during that time, providing several yearsof revenue until the final system integrator implements their solution.Commissioner Woerner inquired how much the anticipated toll revenue is versus the 4.5 million for the interim integrator. Liz Rutman affirmed that the projected revenuefrom tolling will justify the interim cost by comparing monthly revenues versus theinterim cost.Commissioner Mei moved to approve the item. Commissioner Woerner secondedthe motion. The motion passed with the following roll call vote:Yes:Bauters, Cavenaugh, Cutter, Dutra-Vernaci, Haubert, Mei, Miley,Saltzman, Thao, WoernerNo:NoneAbstain: NoneAbsent: Valle5.4. Approve actions to facilitate the completion of environmental permit requirementsfor the State Route 84 Expressway Widening ProjectTess Lengyel introduced the project which relates to the State Route 84 (SR 84)Widening Project. Ms. Lengyel introduced Trinity Nguyen to present this item. Ms.Nguyen provided an update on the project that covered replacement planting andplant establishment work that must be completed before Caltrans will accept thePage 4
Project. She reviewed the contract procurement process and recommended thatthe Commission approve the following actions related to the SR 84 ExpresswayWidening project: Award a contract in the amount of 350,920 to Marshall BrothersEnterprises, Inc. (MBE) for plant establishment work along State Route 84 inLivermore from Ruby Hill Drive to Jack London Boulevard (R21-0005); and Authorize the Executive Director to execute Amendment No. 9 to theProfessional Services Agreement No. A05-0004 with AECOM TechnicalServices, Inc. (AECOM) for an additional amount of 50,000 for a total not-toexceed amount of 16,760,000 and an extension to December 31, 2024 toprovide support as required to ensure compliance with project permitrequirements.Commissioner Bauters asked what amount of the plants were retained from the firstprovider. Trinity Nguyen stated that 10 percent of the plants from the first providerdied. Commissioner Bautters requested further information regarding the type ofplants experiencing failure, noting that groundcover does not equate to canopybuilding.Commissioner Miley moved to approve this item. Commissioner Dutra-Vernaciseconded the motion. The motion passed with the following roll call vote:Yes:No:Abstain:Absent:Cutter, Dutra-Vernaci, Haubert, Mei, Miley, Thao, Woerner, SaltzmanNoneBauters, CavenaughValle6. Committee Member ReportsThere were no member reports.7. Staff ReportsMs. Lengyel noted that Alameda CTC received final actions from the CaliforniaTransportation Commission (CTC) in June for phase two of the I-80 Gilman InterchangeProject and she noted that phase one, which is the bicycle and pedestrian over crossing,is under construction,Ms. Lengyel congratulated the City of Alameda and the Water Emergency TransportationAuthority on the opening of the Seaplane Lagoon Ferry Terminal on July 1, 2021.8. AdjournmentThe next meeting is Monday, September 13, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.Page 5
This page intentionally left blankPage 6
Memorandum4.2DATE:September 7, 2021TO:Programs and Projects CommitteeFROM:Gary Huisingh, Deputy Executive Director of ProjectsAngelina Leong, Assistant Transportation EngineerSUBJECT:Approve the Administrative Amendments to Various Agreements toExtend Agreement Expiration DatesRecommendationIt is recommended that the Commission approve administrative amendments to variousAlameda CTC agreements (A10-013, A14-0051, A15-0030, A17-0060, A17-0080, A17-0115,A17-0125, A17-0126, A18-0026, A18-0049, A18-0054, A19-0036, A19-0060 and A19-0065) insupport of both Alameda CTC-implemented Capital Projects and program deliverycommitments and local agency-sponsored projects receiving Alameda CTC-administereddiscretionary funding.SummaryAlameda CTC enters into agreements/contracts with consultants and local, regional,state, and federal entities, as required, to provide the services, or to reimburse projectexpenditures incurred by project sponsors, necessary to meet the Capital Projects andprogram delivery commitments. Alameda CTC also enters into project fundingagreements (PFAs) with local agencies for allocated Alameda CTC-discretionary fundsources, including Measure B, Measure BB, Vehicle Registration Fee and TransportationFund for Clean Air. All agreements are entered into based upon estimated known projectneeds for scope, cost and schedule.The administrative amendment requests shown in Table A have been reviewed and it hasbeen determined that the requests will not compromise project deliverables.Staff recommends that the Commission approve and authorize the administrativeamendment requests as listed in Table A.Page 7
BackgroundAmendments are considered “administrative” if they include only time extensions. ForPFAs, the 1st request for a one-year time extension may be approved by the ExecutiveDirector, but 2nd and subsequent time extensions are brought to the Commission forapproval.Agreements are entered into based upon estimated known project needs for scope,cost, and schedule. Throughout the life of a project, situations may arise that warrant theneed for a time extension or a realignment of project phase/task budgets.The most common justifications for a time extension include (1) project delays; and (2)extended phase/project closeout activities.Requests are evaluated to ensure that project deliverables are not compromised. Theadministrative amendment requests identified in Table A have been evaluated and arerecommended for approval.Levine Act Statement: Michael Baker International, Inc., HNTB Corporation, Mark Thomas &Company, Inc., HDR Engineering, Inc. and its subconsultants did not report any conflicts inaccordance with the Levine Act.Fiscal Impact: There are no fiscal impacts associated with the requested actions.Attachment:A. Table A: Administrative Amendment SummaryPage 8
4.2ATable A: Administrative Amendment ent No.Michael BakerInternationalI-880 Improvements at23rd and 29th Avenues /Findal design, right-ofway and acquisition anddesign support duringconstruction servicesA10-013HNTB CorporationOakland AlamedaAccess / Projectapproval andenvironmental documentA14-0051Contract Amendment History and RequestsA1:A2:A3:A4:A5:Budget increaseBudget increaseBudget increaseBudget increase12-month time extension from 6/30/2013to 6/30/2014A6: Budget increase for design servicesduring construction and 48-month timeextension from 6/30/2014 to 6/30/2018A7: Budget increaseA8: Budget increase and 18-month timeextension from 6/30/2018 to 12/31/2019A9: Budget increase and 24-month timeextension from 12/31/2019 to12/31/2021A10: Modify indemnification and insuranceprovisions in ContractA11: 6-month time extension from12/31/2021 to 6/30/2022 (currentrequest)A1: Budget increase and 36-month timeextension from 12/312018 to 12/31/2021A2: Modify indemnification and insuranceprovisions in ContractA3: Budget increaseA4: 6-month time extension from 12/31/2021to 6/30/2022 (current request)ReasonCode2FiscalImpactNone2NonePage 9
3HNTB CorporationEast Bay Greenway (LakeMerritt to South HaywardBART) / Project approvaland environmentaldocumentA15-0030A1: Contract General TermsA2: 12-month time extension from12/31/2018 to 12/31/2019A3: 12-month time extension from12/31/2019 to 12/31/2020A4: Modify indemnification and insuranceprovisions in ContractA5: 9-month time extension from 12/31/2020to 9/30/2021A6: 14-month time extension from 9/30/2021to 11/30/2022 (current request)2None4City of FremontSouth Fremont ArterialManagementA17-0060A1: 12-month TFCA time extension from12/12/2020 to 12/12/2021 andagreement time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/2022A2: 12-month TFCA time extension from12/12/2021 to 12/12/2022 (currentrequest)1None5AC TransitBerkeley Southside PilotTransit LanesA17-0080A1: 24-month time extension from12/31/2019 to 12/31/2021A2: 24-month time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/2023 (currentrequest)1None6City of OaklandEast Oakland CommunityStreets PlanA17-0115A1: 12-month time extension from12/31/2019 to 12/31/2020A2: 12-month time extension from12/31/2020 to 12/31/2021 (currentrequest)2NonePage 10
7City of Union CityUnion City BoulevardClass 2 Bike LaneA17-0125A1: Administrative update to scheduleA2: 12-month TFCA time extension (2nd) from12/08/2020 to 12/08/2021 and 12-monthagreement time extension from12/31/2020 to 12/31/2021A3: 12-month TFCA Time Extension (3rd) from12/08/2021 to 12/08/2022 and 24-monthagreement time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/2023 (currentrequest)1None8City of Union CityBicycle and PedestrianMaster Plan UpdateA17-0126A1: 12-month time extension from12/31/2019 to 12/31/2020A2: 12-month time extension from12/31/2020 to 12/31/2021A3: 12-month time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/2022 (currentrequest)1None9Mark Thomas &Company, Inc.I-880 InterchangeImprovements (WhippleRoad/Industrial ParkwaySouthwest and IndustrialParkway) / Projectinitiation document andProject approval andenvironmental documentA18-0026A1: Contract General TermsA2: Modify indemnification and insuranceprovisions in ContractA3: 12-month time extension from 6/30/2021to 6/30/2022 (current request)A4: 6-month time extension from 6/30/2022to 12/31/2022 (current request)1None10HDR Engineering,Inc.7th Street GradeSeparation East / Finaldesign servicesA18-0049A1: Modify indemnification and insuranceprovisions in ContractA2: 12-month time extension from 9/30/2020to 9/30/2021A3: 24-month time extension from 9/30/2021to 9/30/2023 (current request)1NonePage 11
11Alameda CountyPublic WorksHesperian BoulevardCorridor ImprovementsA18-0054A1: 3-month time extension from 3/31/2022to 6/30/2022A2: 12-month time extension from 6/30/2022to 6/30/2023 (current request)1None12City of EmeryvilleEmeryville Senior CenterGroup Trips Bus PurchaseA19-0036A1: 12-month time extension from12/31/2020 to 12/31/2021A2: 12-month time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/2022 (currentrequest)1None13LivermoreAmador ValleyTransit AuthorityWheels Forward / 2020PlanA19-0060A1: 24-month time extension from12/31/2021 to 12/31/23 (current request)1None14City ofPleasantonPleasanton TripReduction Program, FYs19-20 & 20-21A19-0065A1: 12-month TFCA and agreement timeextensions from 12/30/2021 to12/30/2022 (current request)1None(1) Project delays.(2) Extended phase/project closeout activities.(3) OtherPage 12
5.1MemorandumDATE:September 7, 2021TO:Programs and Projects CommitteeFROM:Vivek Bhat, Director of Programming and Project ControlsJacki Taylor, Senior Program AnalystSUBJECT:Approve the 2022 State Transportation Improvement Program Programming Principles and ScheduleRecommendationIt is recommended that the Commission approve the programming principles and schedulefor the development of the Alameda County 2022 State Transportation ImprovementProgram (STIP) project list.SummaryThe STIP is a multi-year capital improvement program of transportation projects on and offthe State Highway System, funded with revenues from the State Highway Account andother funding sources administered by the California Transportation Commission (CTC),including Senate Bill 1 (SB 1). The 2022 STIP will cover Fiscal Years (FYs) 2022-23 through2026-27. Based on the State’s 2022 STIP Fund Estimate, approximately 22.035 million ofnew programming capacity is anticipated for Alameda County of which 15.87 million isanticipated to be available for programming to projects.As part of the overall STIP programming process, Alameda CTC is to adopt and forward aprogram of STIP projects to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) forinclusion in MTC’s 2022 Regional STIP program (2022 RTIP). As the Regional TransportationPlanning Agency (RTPA) for the nine-county Bay Area, MTC is responsible for developingthe regional priorities for the RTIP. MTC approves the region’s RTIP and submits it to theCTC for inclusion in the STIP. Staff is recommending Commission approval of the proposedprogramming principles (Attachment A) and schedule (Attachment B) for the developmentof the Alameda County 2022 STIP project list.BackgroundThe STIP is a multi-year capital improvement program of transportation projects on and offthe State Highway System that is administered by the CTC and funded with revenues fromthe State Highway Account and other State and federal funding sources, including SB 1.Page 13
The STIP is composed of two sub-elements with 75% of the STIP funds reserved for theRegional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) and 25% for the InterregionalTransportation Improvement Program (ITIP).Senate Bill 45 (SB 45) was signed into law in 1996 and had significant impacts on theregional transportation planning and programming process. The statute delegated majorfunding decisions to the local level and allows the Congestion ManagementAgencies/County Transportation Agencies (CMAs/CTAs) to have a more active role inselecting and programming transportation projects. SB 45 changed the transportationfunding structure and modified the transportation programming cycle, programcomponents, and expenditure priorities.Each STIP cycle, Alameda CTC adopts and forwards a program of STIP projects to MTC. Asthe Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA) for the nine-county Bay Area, MTC isresponsible for developing the regional priorities for the RTIP. MTC approves the region’sRTIP and submits it to the CTC for inclusion in the STIP. Caltrans is responsible fordeveloping the ITIP.Development of the 2022 STIP2022 STIP Fund EstimateThe biennial State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) programing process beginswith the development of the STIP Fund Estimate (FE), approved by the CTC. The STIP FundEstimate serves as the basis for determining the county shares for the STIP and theamounts available for programming each fiscal year during the five-year STIP period.Typically, the county shares represent the amount of new STIP funding available forprogramming in the last two years of the new STIP period.Historically, the amount of funding available to Alameda County in a given STIP cycle hasvaried anywhere from 0 to highs in the 200 million range. Although the passage of SB 1has added some stability to the STIP revenue, the Final 2022 STIP Fund Estimate approvedat the August 2021 CTC meeting indicates 22.035 million new programming capacity isavailable for Alameda County in FYs 2025-26 or 2006-27. As indicated below, whenadjustments for prior commitments and program administration are considered, thebalance available for programming to projects is estimated to be 15.87 million:2022 STIP - Alameda County Fund Estimate: 22.035 M 2022 STIP Fund Estimate for Alameda County- 5.063 M Payback of STIP funding advanced to ACTC by MTC through 2020 STIP for I680 Southbound Express Lane from SR-84 to Alcosta Blvd project- 0.355 M STIP Administration funds for MTC- 0.747 M STIP Administration funds for Alameda CTC 15.870 M 2022 STIP Funding Available to ProgramThe Final 2022 STIP Fund Estimate and Guidelines were adopted by the CTC in August.MTC's Regional 2022 STIP Policies and Fund Estimate are anticipated to be released andPage 14
adopted in September 2021and could potentially include adjustments to the RegionalSTIP Fund Estimate.Draft 2022 STIP PrinciplesIn preparation for the development the Alameda County 2022 STIP project list, theCommission is requested to approve a set of principles by which the Alameda Countyshare of the 2022 STIP will be programmed (Attachment A). The proposed principles forthe development of the 2022 STIP are consistent with the State’s 2022 STIP Guidelines andthe goals and objectives of the Alameda CTC’s near-term strategic planning andprogramming documents, the Countywide Transportation Plan and the ComprehensiveInvestm
Sep 13, 2021 · 10:00 a.m. Programs and Projects Committee (PPC) 11:30 a.m. Planning, Policy and Legislation Committee (PPLC) 4:00 p.m. Alameda CTC Audit Committee October 28, 2021 : Advisory Committee Meetings : 1:30 p.m. Alameda County Technical Advisory Committee (ACTAC) September 9, 2021 O
projects. These projects can be managed code COBOL projects or native code COBOL projects or can be C# projects or VB.NET projects, etc. Visual COBOL projects can contain only COBOL programs or classes but these programs and classes can interact with the programs or classes contained within projects written in a different language like C#.
Listed under: Home Automation Projects, LED Projects, Projects 23. Bootload an Arduino with a ZIF Socket Bootloading an Arduino with a ZIF socket allows you to easily program a lot of chips at once without worrying about . 9/6/22, 2:15 PM Advanced View Arduino Projects List - Use Arduino for Projects. Projects Projects Projects. Projects .
Broad Channel Planning Committee Meeting Revised DOS Delivery Schedule January Identify and classify "Priority CDBG-DR Projects" and "Featured Projects" for Broad Channel o Current list of priority projects may exceed 6.06 million allocation o Projection should conform to a range of 6 million to 9 million o Present priority and featured projects list to community
MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE OF ELECTRICAL EXAMINERS HELD ON JANUARY 15, 2020. The Committee was provided a draft of the Minutes for the January 15, 2020 meeting of the Electrical Examiners Committee. A MOTION WAS MADE BY MIKE BASS WITH A SECOND BY DAVID ADCOCK TO ACCEPT THE JANUARY 15, 2020 MEETING MINUTES AS SUBMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE.
Robotics - Automation Projects Arduino RTOS - OS Projects Security - Safety Projects Sensor - Transducer - Detector Projects Sound - Audio Projects Temperature Measurement Projects Recent Projects Temperature and Humidity monitoring with DHT22 sensor Arduino Uno R3 June 28, 2018
MIT 401(k) Oversight Committee, 2014-2019. MIT Committee on Graduate Programs, 2017-2019. MIT International Advisory Committee . MITx Faculty Advisory Committee . MIT Sloan: International Initiatives Committee, Co-Chair of Space Committee, Chair of Load Committee, and Member of various standing committees, MIT Sloan School of Management, 2011-2015.
4 - 7 ASTM Committee C 09 Meeting New Orleans, LA/Sheraton New Orleans www.astm.org 5 - 8 ASTM Committee E 05 Meeting New Orleans, LA/Sheraton New Orleans www.astm.org 6 ASTM Committee C 17 Meeting New Orleans, LA/Sheraton New Orleans www.astm.org 6 - 7 ASTM Committee C 27 Meeting New Orleans, LA/Sheraton New Orleans www.astm.org
Accounting Standard (IAS) terminology and requiring pre sentation in International Standard format. Approach – These qualifications were designed using Pearson’s Efficacy Framework. They were developed in line with World-Class Design principles giving students who successfully complete the qualifications the opportunity to acquire a good knowledge and understanding of the principles .
