COMMUNITY MEETING REPORT Petitioner: Shea Homes

2y ago
14 Views
2 Downloads
5.83 MB
56 Pages
Last View : 2d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Raelyn Goode
Transcription

COMMUNITY MEETING REPORTPetitioner: Shea HomesRezoning Petition No. 2019-096This Community Meeting Report is being filed with the Office of the City Clerk and the CharlotteMecklenburg Planning Commission pursuant to the provisions of the City of Charlotte ZoningOrdinance.PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONTACTED WITH DATE AND EXPLANATIONOF HOW CONTACTED:A representative of the Petitioner mailed written notice of the date, time and location of theCommunity Meeting to the individuals and organizations set out on Exhibit A attached hereto bydepositing such notice in the U.S. mail on August 27th. A copy of the written notice is attachedhereto as Exhibit B.DATE, TIME AND LOCATION OF MEETING:The Community Meeting was held on Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 6:30 p.m. at the PhalanxMasonic Lodge, 500 North Sharon Amity Road, Charlotte, NC 28211.PERSONS IN ATTENDANCE AT MEETING (see attached copy of sign-in sheet):The Community Meeting was attended by those individuals identified on the sign-in sheet attachedhereto as Exhibit C. The Petitioner was represented at the Community Meeting by Mike Shea andMatt Kearns, as well as by Petitioner’s agents, Eddie Moore with McAdams and Collin Brown andBrittany Lins with Alexander Rick PLLC. Representatives of the property owner and CouncilmanMatt Newton were also in attendance.SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION:Mr. Collin Brown welcomed the attendees and introduced the Petitioner’s team, using aPowerPoint presentation, attached hereto as Exhibit D. Mr. Brown showed aerials of theapproximately 5-acre property, which was the same site as the community meeting location,currently owned by the Charlotte Masonic Temple.Mr. Brown explained that a developer must consider many factors, including property ownerrequirements, existing zoning, natural and environmental constraints, transportation requirements,adjacent property owner concerns, broader community concerns, City priorities, Council memberpriorities, and market realities. The property is currently zoned R-3, which typically allowsapproximately three single-family dwelling units per acre (DUA). The adopted South District landuse plan recognizes the current masonic lodge on the property and therefore recommendsinstitutional uses for the site.Mr. Brown stated that a by-right development on the property would likely result in a densitysomewhere between three to six DUA, if a developer were to utilize certain density bonuses in theOrdinance such as the Incentive-Based Inclusionary Housing Policy. Mr. Brown further explained01717-001/00184422-1

that the rezoning process allows for the benefit of community involvement and site-specific planswhereas a by-right development would not require community input or site design commitments.Mr. Brown stated that a proposed conditional plan, if approved by City Council, would governdevelopment on the site, regardless of whether Shea Homes is the developer or not.The Petitioner has organized at least three informal meetings with community members, includingmeetings prior to developing a site plan or submitting a rezoning application. The Petitioner’steam developed an initial townhome concept that included a total of fifty-nine (59) townhomes,with a density of approximately 11.8 DUA, and a maximum height of sixty (60) feet toaccommodate a three-story townhome product.During community outreach meetings in response to this initial plan, the Petitioner’s team receivedfeedback that the community’s priorities were: (1) requests to lower the density/unit count; (2)concerns over traffic and access points; (3) environmental/stormwater impacts; and (4) producttype. Based on this feedback, the Petitioner’s team reevaluated the initial site plan proposal andintends to submit a revised site plan requesting only thirty-eight (38) townhome units (a reductionby 21 units), which equates to approximately 7.7 DUA. Also, the Petitioner now intends toimplement a different townhome product type that is only two stories tall, thereby lowering themaximum height request to forty (40) feet. Mr. Brown showed several images of Shea Homes’Tindall Park development as an example of the product type that the Petitioner envisions for thesite. Feedback during this community meeting reflected that the reduced density plan was wellreceived by community members in comparison to the initial plan. One attendee stated that thePetitioner’s team “came back with a nice compromise.”Mr. Brown then opened the meeting up for questions. One attendee inquired about the buffersurrounding the property. In response, the Petitioner’s agents stated that a Class C buffer wouldbe provided with a wall or fence.In response to questions regarding the projected price point for the townhomes, the Petitioner’sagent responded that they are expecting a range from the high 600K to low 800Ks. The squarefootage would range from approximately 2,600 to 3,100 square feet.An attendee asked whether the townhomes would have master bedrooms on the main floor andcommented that she thought this would be a desirable product for the area. The Petitioner’s teamresponded that the planned unit mix would include some townhomes with master bedrooms on themain floor and some with the bedrooms upstairs.In response to questions related to stormwater, the Petitioner’s agent responded that stormwaterwould be treated underground in the approximate location of the visitor parking area and willaccount for a one-hundred-year storm.One attendee had concerns regarding the proposed access location lining up with the Whitby Pondaccess because of fears that it would create cut-thru traffic. The Petitioner’s agent stated thatCDOT would likely require that the roads line up.In response to a question regarding trash pickup, the Petitioner’s team responded that theOrdinance requires that a dumpster location be shown on the site plan even if roll out containers01717-001/00184422-1

are expected to be used at the site. The Shea Homes team is still evaluating whether dumpsters orroll out containers will be used to manage trash at this site.In response to a question regarding the expected development timeline, the Petitioner’s team statedthat they expected construction to begin in Fall 2020 as a best-case scenario and site completionwould occur in 2022.The formal meeting concluded at approximately 7:30 p.m. and the Petitioner’s representativescontinued to answer individual questions until approximately 7:45 p.m.Respectfully submitted this 16th day of September 2019.cc:John Kinley, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department01717-001/00184422-1

Exhibit A

962019-0962019-0962019-096ORGANIZATIAmity Place Homeowners AssociationCmpd- Crime WatchCollinswood Neighborhood AssociationCotswold Homes Condominiums Homeowners Association, IncCotswold Neighborhood Assoc.Cotswold Neighborhood Assoc.Cotswold Neighborhood Assoc.Cotswold Neighborhood Assoc.Cotswold/Sheraton Park Neighborhood OrganizationGiverny Homeowners AssociationHubbard Glen Homeowners AssociationHuntingtowne Farms Neighborhood AssociationOlde Cotswold Neighborhood OrganizationProvidence Park Neighborhood AssociationProvidence Park Neighborhood OrganizationProvidence Park Neighborhood WatchRamblewood Neighborhood AssociationRandolph Park Civic AssociationThe Cotswolds Condominium Homeowners AssociationVietnamese Association of CharlotteFIRST NAMEKatieMichaelRAMikeJanJohnMary FrancesMercerWillHeatherRobinSandraDougMary CarolineBerniceRossEricHalMaureenBillMichael Long

LAST sTurnerCherryWilliamsNguyenSTREET ADD635 McAlway Road4319 Wordsworth Ln715 N. Wendover Rd4808 Walker Rd4509 Woodlark Ln308 Wonderwood Drive608 Ashworth Rd514 Ellsworth Road1021 Churchill Downs Ct2611 Danbury St4527 Gaynor Rd1114 Nancy Dr236 Hunter Ln2627 Danbury St2903 Clover Road242 Beckham Ct4619 Montclair Av4733 Gaynor Rd516 Chillingworth Ln209 Sloane Square Wy338 S Sharon Amity RdUNIT NUM otteUnit arlotteCharlotteCharlotteCharlotteUnit 11282112821128211

5037371850373818503739OWNERLASTNFENDERBROWN & BUTLER FAMILY HOLDINGS TBY POND UCCIOSTERKINGWATER OAK NC PARTNERS LLCCHARLOTTE MASONIC TEMPLE ASSOCCHEMPLAVILDEVINDAYAW HOLDINGS Y THERESAASHLEY ZDANIELEGHOSADAVID L JRMANURU SUJAYEENDRACASEY JOSEPHASSOCIATION INCPATRICK JRYAN THOMASJOSEPH THOMASMARY PATRICIAMICHEAL EBRYANT KRYAN RSAMUELBERNARDJOANNA RFRED W JRWILLIAM FCONNER WERIC CTINACLAIRE MARIENICHOLAS JSTEPHEN CALEBINEZLAURENSEAN THOMASCHAD RICHARDWILLIAM W JRCHRISTOPHER STEWART WARDDANIEL D

RAJANE BPAVANAERINRYANAGHAYEREHANISCHKARANTHCARROLLJODI SMEREDITH ELAINETERESA ANNRICHARD JMACISSAACSTROTHERKESSLERWELCMOLLIE SJENNIFER GJENNIFER KRASHIDAH LOPEZWILLIAM R IIISHIRLEY CPAMELA DMOLLY GTONIA TOR HENRYCARISSAASHLEY WILSONCABELLOSMUCCIOSTERC/O CORTLAND PARTNERS LLCJAMESCHEMPLAVILSTEPHANIE LINTONJANICE SLAURA MICHELLESTEPHANIE MKOVALESKIBURTONTOWNSENDHORNMAILADDR1427 NORTH SHARON AMITY RD4438 WHITBY LN4428 WHITBY LN4740 WATER OAK RD4736 WATER OAK RD812 CALLBRIDGE CT524 LEES COURT ST528 LEES COURT ST532 LEES COURT STPO BOX 308164520 NIGHT HERON LN4516 NIGHT HERON LN4512 NIGHT HERON LN4508 NIGHT HERON LANE4504 NIGHT HERON LN4427 WHITBY LN4431 WHITBY LN4435 WHITBY LN4439 WHITBY LN4701 ADDISON DR4730 STAFFORD CIR4716 STAFFORD CIR4619 ADDISON DR4627 ADDISON DR4635 ADDISON DR4643 ADDISON DR4711 STAFFORD CR4719 STAFFORD CIR4723 STAFFORD CIR3424 PEACHTREE RD STE 300PO BOX 221042442 N SHARON AMITY RD436 NORTH SHARON AMITY RD3558 NORTH DAVIDSON ST4634 ADDISON DR4626 ADDISON DR4618 ADDISON DR422 N SHARON AMITY RD

MAILADDR2ATTN BRAD 112820528211282112821128211

Exhibit B

Exhibit C

5}Vk)YY L y- irUAssiDY j{w%\0PFlO(/Vt COf\AMUM (TJ M TW6jirlgr) vi/VTVme-ApD S t3ha suJjforbaw kUsloLoJrs ft?/0 AiU ta Or 28z.il.J hCZ 1*6 n& l k Rw**7 3*0 23 -ViftjcfercA .Cl(x3 i 1 L juOiS)d.//*. & 2)l si s& *,&.*.% , Gvtit Sl(s, &*/a(il l 'vi* . Ssn uj Qaerfe bLnQw«/aJt wlQ wlht.us( }g cOjA.o 2SZI 1jj-0/OA. Lw-fh ealWnS' I o(3a v»ia i J.armf"Y A.'\ OvA,AA* S ?/4f- Ustu -2 4 "jWtAvl6& . AmiA U- 3z vJ1 jlM 5Sy -tf jjMJ AmcI/iiU A?6 uifyji4t 1-U 2&2U 5 6DjU&Lamudi . mMojuo yjJfww 2eLvTe/lt/ v5 VtyWajrrOak* hil-feA hc T A-Wpi 4M0O W Htbi If), 2S lH"DP-. &Ov-H ?AVlt l A rhc-rclpAV /PD V hHbij Lr) t fei) SCo . A)/io) P JrnA/i). pr *l iwrix fejWoyere- H" 732- J**er0aL Ws eagki*jg gma ii M Ba/lowrtW WdoW a)cxLV .nc t*fo nefyld/\ ]XMi{fyQa*dr ttirtlfcrt U*1 l/v/JvlW Ul*6fe vO-i ojbooneG . Ctfvwonai i. CofVjy&ckuJ (JUim / yanh or(g 4iy ?C- givicy/l . 0Ov \

Exhibit D

Official Community MeetingRezoning Petition #2019-096Sharon Amity RoadSeptember 11, 2019 Copyright 2018 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved.

AGENDA IntroductionsProperty LocationDevelopment ConsiderationsCurrent ZoningProposed Land Use PlanConditional RezoningInitial Rezoning PlanFeedback from Informal MeetingsUpdated ProposalComparison in Light of PrioritiesDiscussion2

Property Owner:Charlotte Masonic TemplePetitioner:Matt Kearns & Mike SheaEddie MooreCollin Brown & Brittany Lins3

roDeoPropertyLocationklgates.com4

v1mismaAjyWph "T*-bLDewiH6(w 5Lim[Q/ikhiiiJfpTklSt[Da iaippw]S*,JMB& &;rJb' JnHrtID*. d «'l*ji Jil iHhjh,Bg&*kV"v.-r*Stfjan/-J iViN9rfj 5'.; 3is"1FJfe&:i twIS16.n:T,;%w s&?

IV*mmJ\atos*-VfMIRiSilx& "« :!!ftiV : 'i#r t-ijvT.K" v -V'«Ji iEfc-o.t V V%\"t.1*1. I1Vchi? lilotfe (,V. - jCH8K *r-jpJV* s'i: hnrlnrtf3m KH*i»'jiv:,flrIB*7 *mf*v.\sJHK v!KV.'4isjjf#M-L*IP*Sfcak":: s .-V» ?11I5.1 iIh b*gVI'F rim*sj :,*;iE&3v,Q4M*J' t* [\v ?S-,a\x n:pvVf. w "-.w]i

\ / r\,-eri:WX\a,y W//'\\ /\\*w %\ 1VyX.!/& P1*iSS\:? LSrI- W ss; (N5#* /TBfyf»rv *8 .yJV * \/fk!k\ /%*K1f*.r'F*Mr *k ; #5Vl &.\*mm *I 4*mrvw\s. * .A .w\mtoy?vV/V I / ,«9—c \iK v\v A&«r.-A1 x »\ vvtffiats'; / T\I/\\!*?»- /- 5 AcresW-imX -/J\ AOwmm \mSSy9%-» T- JfcV - yKyirmOi*4pfe,.,ujfajf A-* 5 "BtWV'i /#IVi./##. ' x»fiV7'-i.-;3 VJ% I \. » AxV \J *fa.if y\Vi&* \L-jsif1Vty wItx/tF;*jtwmy'.:rSJIf%BT j3S(-0* ,*a\iITS.« S-rtit-ZifaCD-f \\\Si «MEyfp P\l-W.iyVILP- „ -«l\«4 . Td 'Iy *7:ysik: 1i- 4 ". ,. ' 1f:y?/v"«'''*% hWtem&M m [jShs\1-Iu Nil«U,kai,sirMR'Emoryitr,"V;V;-«—513Jcm.'( UTS'9g*S IT [;i,tIIM - -.m wL*B./LI'a(0( ' -Stc:Inr

r JTAVfeAmLJ0Hr.JA'iti!/.;2OTasn 3fcr-l-r5.&» Iw%, I'%L*.i-TvVv ?-- w;i*S2?- ' P*7S!E1.5Sa[V1 *.U1 \MTj1;. . .I'l*88

r jerauoConsiderationsklgates.com9

DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Property Owner RequirementsExisting ZoningNatural / Environmental ConstraintsAccess / Transportation RequirementsAdjacent / Transportation RequirementsAdjacent Owner ConcernsOrdinance / Policy Requirement (non-zoning)Adopted Area PlansCity PrioritiesAdjacent UsesCommunity ConcernsMarket Realities

.r aCurrent Zoninggklgates.com11

*./r / 7 //7-v, ;-xxx"r/VV/* \1ml—v,»;* ///W*/fsdSlJim*X,-iii.\x-/*»,i-SE3S*.\- —!filmf// §i- j]/il"i*ic«t fc f/ ;I- ;.V 7 .2.2 ytr§sl/;V'" .i74Vfr#L*tm* ***1 H*i l Lr 'i Jl14Li --4u i»-.1I ., «M»—w«f otx«o»4i—«ilix.'V. i LJPJ«» /1R-3J/%/ V)Jy/C' /X/w yf T* /x„*/4„- /.n /x% LJ1*-.V. % x/* 'Ct/XVjx/!//'A.%.,5i»''v.\rsfciiiifevi—'Lr S\\-—t — \— \/ 0';.!m1tim3D\\;fij;Ms*. .J-J4uV\i.I hTSp.-'i" Br— IjIij f:J".[ IIprf0/\ ikf /Si a*f vJ * hI i 1 . VV— i , -J fAifii n4 —m ry PI iLLt. SSkjfSri.w '- fSBU-SH. */rMv - - J-i.rf;iiX.ir*1i«VV v \ -"!fti*r:11s4isa4«L-l;-sTlfffW*!\»rr fi ';u(i.h'' "iL /X.;-1.Sr Ht'lTJ -IIVSJ fmr*

'XdoDtec Landc Use PlanAdoptedklgates.com13

South t0Jr.' f"'Jt/rrApproved Oy Charlotte -Meckferovrg Planning Commission June 1, 1995Amended bv Charlotte -Mecklenburg Planning Commission July S, 1992 and Septembers, 1995Adcotea pv Mecklenburg Board of Count/ Commissioners July 12, 1993Adcotzci bv C'parlcttJ-. City Ccurcii Novembers, 1993

C---K; :;r3'feV\\wLiT? rSv';'.ISr Calm «arPO \J5-.,.I. i'iljlV-v - Cr\NXt-' "\\i&vv": "fjfi ;n\1-\V'*.8 fie i T'jf i l rrTV\\A\Multi-Family %\\NV\ '. 1 1.' In iUniNvx"iI nstrlutionai ReSgious KJ!rJ(n\—— -Single Family 3///Aj-.MNUAftv3.ifs .Wmzmu.Vsfc.N :Ovl!\V-*X. I(l: :ji.i C;- .4i'V\!w-jn{ 1 llI--.XUCity qfCharlPtte,1515I

r ates.com16

8 '"1II*itv' /aVm.MKm nVVl }.:yJ.-. &*m& wmmai«v*a r«1ktakmyesrv /- 5 AcresLd **N8§i%&2/*x %5T«3vT88awTfc,.I B:r i. .i \St—iLjWIIfc:Ianiai'1—-

om18

Density Dwelling Units Per AcreSubject Property is Approximately 5 acres3 DUA 15 Homes6 DUA 30 Homes12 DUA 60 Homes

r jonaiuoConditionalRezoningcklgates.com20

Conventional vs. Conditionalcd»RezoningCHARLOTTE.How to identify Conditional Rezoning:Conventional0-1 (CD)*0-1TOD-MOTOD-M**B-2(CD) SPA*NS, CC, RE-3, MX** Commits to standards that go beyond the base zoning ordinancerequirements and are specific for each petition.** Reduces or eliminates the base zoning ordinance standards, ANDtypically commits to other standards that go beyond the base zoningordinance requirements. Also specific for each petition.klgates.com21

RezoWhether too Rezone

PETITIONER/OWNER CONSIDERATIONS Expensive Time Consuming Uncertainty Stressful Can Result in Better/More Profitable Plan23

COMMUNITY CONSIDERATIONS Expensive Time Consuming Uncertainty Stressful Can Result in Better Plan Have a seat at the table24

PlaInitial Rezoning Planklgates.com25

HII II5*5illsmr-7-ri ii?H&11HC3MOHTH 5HflAfiDN AMITYAROADMifflfijaiic ijVilSH1MB Si. « SIsHp"" '—14- - -mmj . -mi!hii* i nr !s r/f' !F Tiiii0 0 q ImLh0 0 0j.! !*i/iIr% 0 0 ! ,i'W3I4 : I'Iill!HiM—*Gri!\* 1H fIj! *K! : :MIn1WMmssmmiml':l /7WMI/JJS{&f, .yrt MT yrts YJ,w"M %JI 21I *\T/1 4r- — -fLiiu«si?5;;26Oti QtJii\BsiIm i !:«S.'eieim//I!J ,1s/3!/Il?fl 'I if' (T . —4-JP1[JMI'MiI?59 Units11.8 DUA60’ height«3 !0 0 f! 1T1,,Jin0I!IIij\II0 0, ri 0 Fiir ;. 00 HhpMHM@itn102. D 3 10

r jceeaoaFeedbackfrom Informal Meetingsklgates.com27

IF WE PURSUE REZONING WHAT ARE THECOMMUNITY’S PRIORITIES? Traffic Improvement NeedsConnectivity ConcernsBike/Pedestrian ImprovementsBufferingNatural Open SpaceCommunity Open SpaceAestheticsRear Load Vs. Open SpaceAffordability

FEEDBACK #1 Lower Density/Unit Count Traffic/Access Point Concerns Environmental/Stormwater Impacts Product Type

odated ProposalProoosaUpdated

/ cn/VIji.7I/J*lan.tI cr*H1i?.-tj . c\BFW,3,TTm sWj1/"i iK " IJ[:JU;HpI .«JBfF" @-SsSHTSf ffi: * i f -I— —I—1 -4——4 M 0.00 iy -i liTil,JWn aa I" i :;!ii3iiiii 00ili ;!5 .i* fiuw:—fr j"-*-B- -""w:r 5T.—ru;S?7»«H Xi cgUtfp&'R!siniI7T *hS1IIJ*'ihM:/n AX.1Lfj0h- iaTUtil9!rJl'e l & MS if 4 1 0. ifl3 TIT"it.E i.*iAHIEEH f LPSr4 jlOfj1Si' —p r\n i bs-PSi iSssIvrJVfBKili NTS*1IttfaLi—Id 1./; "4 V i0:!US1ll1 'TUTK0 I - iiit,s/jlL i—-ar ijS rjja.;jr;/r r.-ll?8 Plitl3 1?§: 1 1j ,WJi*.T7tI3- VUW\ "jAkl!iIy/Si*( [LjrL !kisiii"IV " "'10IJiI ir-rri*\ ? : v.:o 1tij'SIii./IsI/!erOJ r /if!'!l/klgates.com / 3138 Units7.7 DUA40’ heightill!i IIK9d 85 S3 E iSS:-.1liVo'rl II IHI'IC .' 'j!QVDd U1IAIV NOHTHS H1W0Nf\SI L-SIH1mPiliiiii

\JfrpiSILfiKSsisirS;4jg»"-,(jOOOC-r ii5S IIEBnacj--hiIi iiz"r wjffl;I *t- vi i' : r iCDgigpii'AU-i'JJJ.- - ,(0 I. s tmjO- r s - s Lal!lcs ;fespa7 s :irCD -?-CD - r:rC3 (G CD::5 i3DS s CDi 35 3 ricmc 5 Ii.Mli-itaHL.'WII1!MSfa.i 3)3 JI'"! II5Ki :***T:30 J" " J.f i:; I I30ITZ! VCiJ5 JC "'- ( CD. p8* (0-*I? v . Ijhhj.S5s IaI***** *'KSJ1-S5M—-"CDJti.If-t.ill«X\w2rjj2J1 1SI; D rr EE *p . - -. g rqs I' Bck:iI S Df9g5CD J L— - « ."* : 3 ' -3TTi-ts uiJi — - ii ccccsr-c-'I5 .1 d CDM SI s iIi1" Vyiiklgates.com3232:

'V*iB1l\KR 12MF ;»rt LI.-i;v.-- 1J\\y Vri. «i.'

pies ofo Sheaa ProductProcExamples

:rrm f F\ir-'i!&A, f ;.v.,r.:m4rK.:.1. 1II! !! V t .indiiii1& 0jr- 1t-nit'" 'J" Mi nJ!131tmMp* jjikiA&*ast%:-:I hrsHiBriPJiE& «B-*r !»SpK«JSSggTIN PALL:VPARKISfSBS «STwiwT.rv.imm 5.';;S&s Ibps?3** WWi-— wra:i- S" 5 4BH; i mm -T1klgates.com3535

1iyr B -' 2LpSIW 1IV* v-.,mi551 ;inhitiM1\ .it—;: H31ssest '51 1Ii-issssl \!i E1 tfinIP !iTiSillpig/asssl ftai sill BlI iif!iiW;H 1 .J I,. 1n \1 ''IIrssklgates.com/i\a »v«ft'.y?8IIlEH" VWa.Ji.1;:ai.VHI iJBt i. VV-illnsf-"'Mw'w?;aI'll.-.ie fillH " i; si/V,*//mllisi.1 ';'y:MgI h «';'iW36o*BlA:ymlYah\HP sIMhA!:llH. arai. m1HV.4i

klgates.com37LZ.'v-''1-J*r r-jisss—.-L«it'\ /J(ImAisoesV;'9 qymA,9ifTjrJ;p3S VmmI'II Hi! IIsI. is?-mmSmMapimn* Vjpv-'x' \\— -V%-/— X". .:'rifSIrMu

.r aCommunity Prioritiesklgates.com388

FEEDBACK #1 Lower Density/Unit Count 21 Fewer Units Traffic/Access Point Concerns Additional Drive Environmental/Stormwater ImpactsCoordination with City Project Product Type New product, 2-story

.r aDDiscussion

MSIIVc ';IV*tsjgpy/.' ' .F34'r fc"%llsHi*ra i&J1ri-"'''"Jf'-alVi*Ws*-1/A*M. *rt-i 4«' sSBw,r": Ql! 0{ :F., k -TXff ilmSi,. flf?-.- S#Sl*,crV'!191rv 3; /%y:. H :\v." §:VBh si* 0 :*\psII

:r.I ,w -JCJn? jssiiL*U' 15/I : , Jfc;ItIH/p* 71iriij§-TlTlJHiMkv* i%ii'.r-?- PPJ jy-Inr-l-; Jf-*r%mit0r :»;ifr10aT,-iL.iE'i'i* -i1. [T 0 *3'S g 0; t0w ft8: "I. SfcJr s*-:a"02K!l&! SPoft aI :iil\*f, *:0iIjjjfa h iCr"-miSj-p ;ih 0 ' @» jjit m -I H 0111 ! -!li il j111 j .3ri-mT:A*8i1f *J:'-0-i l -;t lj-y/«hIJE" r 'i.p.-f-"T-c :r-r*»rnuMifl.p1i- 1s(SS Dd a51WII iVi.' m .ii mindqvoa A.JJ1V\JV NOHVH5 H .UON.I IMA M&j" 0AW '-:Jfe. I .yr.1V&&00#f%ii-TlTL-TI!IiB11I Irfcf &!iSfI—.mIJ!ijl013K*"4* I .if:" ;-mm/ .j. % fc0:Pit rV?mi0s0bimv\rV!mOK; fKT-rtiTSfj" ' fer—i*IIklgates.com31." #j ,j;*a 18-/*i0uII : /- Jp3i'Ft,ITT/!Si".Pr !a/"1?Mlli \J"' *ff" V1 i1 . ''l' "ri«V Pit-' 342i

petitioner: shea homes rezoning petition no. 2019-096 . . carissa mucci 4711 stafford cr ashley wilson oster 4719 stafford cir 4723 stafford cir c/o cortland partners llc 3424 peachtree rd ste 300 po box 221042 james c

Related Documents:

for shea tree protection; Reduced economic benefits due to the inefficiencies in the shea butter value chain. 1.75 million shea trees planted with fruiting starting from year 7 and greatly increasing from year 15 ; 400,000 (nonshea) planted and integrated into the - landscape;

Cassandra Smith - Petitioner Cassandra Smith-SummitCounty-2016-00057 Petition Approved 2016 Catherine Love - Petitioner Catherine Love-SummitCounty-2015-00830 Petition Approved 2015 CATHY DAVIS - Petitioner CATHY DAVIS-LakeCounty-201

For example, Petitioner Greg Jeloudov was forced out; Petitioner Panayiota Bertzikis was denied rank due to her "pending investigation"; Petitioner Andrew Schmidt left due to extreme emotional distress as a result of the sexual violence committed against him; Petitioner Amber

First published by: Health Service Executive James O'Shea, Paul Goff Printed by: Health Service Executive ISBN: 9781786020451 Suggested Citation: O'Shea, J., Goff, P. and Armstrong, R. (2017) SAOR: Screening and Brief Intervention for Problem Alcohol and Substance Use (2 nd ed). Dublin: Health Service Executive. l JAmES O'SHEA Works for the Office of Nursing and midwifery Services .

Una audiencia se realizó el: Date Fecha There was no jury. Neither the husband nor wife asked for a jury. No hubo jurado. El esposo y la esposa no solicitaron un jurado. 1. Appearances - Comparecencias Petitioner - Peticionario(a) The Petitioner’s name is: _. El nombre del Peticionario(a): First -Primer nombre Middle- Segundo nombre LastApellido The Petitioner is the: (Check one box .

No. 18-956 IN THE GOOGLE LLC, Petitioner, v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONER

Cassandra Harris-HamiltonCounty-2016-00269 Petition Approved 2016 Cassandra Smith - Petitioner Cassandra Smith-SummitCounty-2016-00057 Petition Approved 2016 Catherine Love - Petitioner Catherine Love-SummitCounty-2015-00830 Petition Approved 2015 CATHY DAVIS - Petitioner CATHY DAVIS-LakeCounty-2016

hardware IP re-use and consistency accross product families and higher level programming language makes the development job far more convenient when dealing with the STM32 families. HIGH-PERFORMANCE HIGH DEGREE OF INTEGRATION AND RICH CONNECTIVITY STM32H7: highest performance STM32 MCUs with advanced features including DSP and FPU instructions based on Cortex -M7 with 1 to 2 Mbytes of .