Electrical Safety Audit - E-Hazard

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
316.28 KB
20 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Mya Leung
Transcription

Taking the Flash Out of Electrical SafetyApril 23, 2021Electrical Safety AuditPrepared for:ABC CompanyMaintenance DepartmentAny City, USAPrepared by:Zarheer JoomaElectrical EngineerCONTENTSIntroductionPart 1: Visual Observation AuditPart 2: Energy Control AuditPart 3: Compliance AuditConclusionAppendix: Pictures(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20212IntroductionA management systems and operational audit was performed at ABC Company Maintenance Department witha focus on electrical safety. This was the first electrical safety audit performed at the department after anupdated Electrical Safety Program (ESP) was rolled out in and electrical safety training offered to certainemployees. Personal protective equipment for shock and arc flash was also recently implemented. The auditwas based on the requirements of the NFPA 70E 2018 Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace as thiswas last revision used for the ESP.The audit was performed by Zarheer Jooma and attended by Employee #1 and Employee #2. All systems,procedures, and operational activities that have been well established and documented by the maintenancedepartment were audited in detailed. Each requirement was first verified to exist in a management system,then the workers or the leadership (as appropriate) were interviewed to demonstrate understanding of therule and provide documented (or observable) compliance. A brief discussion regarding contractors andprojects was held with Employee #3.Noncompliant observations may consist of two types, those where no evidence was found or werenoncompliance was clearly observed. The report attempts to differentiate between these two types ofobservations. The recipients of this report are encouraged to identify omissions and provide documentedevidence to remediate noncompliant findings.Not all compliant observations are listed in this report, instead, only a select few that are known high risk itemsare presented.Certain sections of the audit were not covered since the maintenance department is in the process of rollingout newly required work practices as per the ESP. As such, some audit questions were answered verbally asdocumentation is still being developed. Examples are the Energized Electrical Work Permit (EEWP) andsupervisory work inspection for working inside the restricted approach boundary. This part of the audit wasdiscussed with the team to create awareness of what future audits will be examining.The maintenance department appears to be working under adequate policies and procedures, however, sometime is still required for the electrical safety principles to become part of the work culture. The observationspresented below appear more to be learning and practice challenges than deep rooted systemic deficiencies.The results of the audit are presented in the next section and detail the appropriate article of the NFPA 70E 2018, the observation, and recommendations where applicable.The audit results are presented in three sections: (i) Energy Control, (ii) Visual Observations, and (iii) GeneralCompliance. The conclusion and recommendations on general items then follows in the final section.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20213Electrical Safety Audit – Visual AuditRequirementCare of PPE properly maintained,inspected before use, and properlystoredInsulating glovesLeather protectorsArc rated leather glovesArc rated clothingFace shields; have wrap-aroundguarding protecting the face chin,forehead, ears, and neck area.BalaclavasObservations, Recommendation, or Notes(i) Home laundering is permitted by the employer. In such cases OSHA and NFPA 70Erequires training on home laundering in line with the manufacturers care instructions. It isrecommended that a brief training program based on the manufacturers label be establishedand implemented through NetLearning.(i) Gloves procured are compliant with ASTM D120(ii) Test dates are within specification(iii) No glove program exists – recommend that a documented program be implemented(iv) During demonstration on the use of the glove, employees donned the glove without apre-inspection(v) No glove storage bag provided to employees(vi) Employees are provided with Class 0 gloves that are rated for a maximum 1000V AC. Aclass 00 glove rated for a maximum 500V AC will be more comfortable for workers.(vii) It is recommended that a two color glove program be implemented for ease ofidentification of six monthly electrical glove test compliance.(i) During the observation, the employee did not inspect the leather over protector before theglove was donned.Not used(i) Employees appeared to use arc rated clothing adequately: buttoned up, sleeved rolleddown, shirt tucked in.(ii) Employee observed using polyester cotton blend T-Shirts that are not allowed by OSHAand NFPA 70E.(iii) Metal belt buckles should not be used inside the arc flash and shock boundaries –employees indicated that belts are being used inside these boundaries.(i) Face shields are still being rolled out and a sample was inspected and found compliant toexisting standards.(ii) Employees appeared unclear on when to use face shield – arc flash study should beupdated.(iii) Presently face shields are being shared until such time that individual face shields can beprovided. This is not recommended and must be resolved as soon as possible.(i) Balaclava – compliantTest Instruments and Equipment;Voltmeters are Cat III(i) Voltmeters inspected were compliant.(ii) There is unofficial calibration program for meters. It is recommended that the program beextended and formalized to include all meters and include an electrical insulation test as well.Test leads and instrument checkedvisually before useEmployees wear arc rated clothingthat completely covers allflammable clothingEmployees wear non-conductiveClass E hard hatsEmployees wear face shields asrequiredTest leads were not inspected by employee during the visual observation.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax(i) Balaclava – compliantHard hats are Class ENot observed3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20214 Continued: Visual AuditRequirementEmployees wear balaclavas asrequiredEmployees wear AR hair and beardnetsEmployees wear safety glassesEmployees wear appropriatehearing protectionBarricade Tape and otherbarricades are placed at theoutermost boundary, whethershock of arc flash; states the levelof the hazard; states what thehazard is; states what action isrequiredSingle Line Diagrams aremaintained in an updatedconditionAccess to working spaces are keptclear and unobstructedWarning signs are visible, securelyattached and in a legible conditionCircuit identification is securelyaffixed and maintained in anupdated and legible conditionIllumination for and aroundelectrical equipment sufficient toperform work safelyGeneral Safety RequirementsWarning labels: State ‘WARNINGARC FLASH HAZARD’ in compliancewith NEC Article 110.16Warning labels state NominalVoltageWarning labels state Arc FlashBoundaryLabels prior to September 30, 2011include Category Level or IncidentEnergy(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 FaxObservations, Recommendation, or NotesNot observedEmployees indicated that no Arc Rated hair nets or beard nets exist. Caution should beexercised when working exposed to arc flash hazards in clean condition areas.Not observedNot observedBarriers as shown in the picture below are used. The employees raised uncertainty regardingthe fire resistance of such barricades. Since barricades are used at the arc flash boundary,this isn’t seen as too much of a risk. However, until the arc flash study is undertaken, the arcflash boundary is unknown.Non-compliant drawings and unavailable to employees.Noncompliant both in terms of storage and maintaining of NEC clearances. See pictures.Noncompliant. See picturesNot observed, however, safety department was requested to perform an illumination auditwhen workers begin the use of the arc rated face shields.(i) Grounding and bonding tests are not performed.(ii) No engineering specification for new projects and arc flash studies(i) Arc flash study is outdated and has not been reviewed. An updated study is an immediatepriority.(ii) Many panels not provided with Arc Flash and Shock Labels(iii) A sticker type label was coming loose – recommend that only engraved labels be used toidentify equipment(iv) Panels dual-labeled (contradictory) and handwritten labels observed – both incorrect andnot allowed(v) Incorrect voltages indicated on multiple panels. This is a serious finding and must beremediated urgently.(vi) Arc flash study labels attached on certain equipment is incorrect indicated 0cal/cm2incident energy when the actual energy is much higher. This is a serious finding.(vii) ELRB Panel door was left opened. See pictures.(viii) Transformer labeled – not recommended due to dual voltage and dual arc flash hazard.(ix) The panel identification labels appeared well developed and installed. Employeesindicated that not all panels have identification labels.(x) Visited A-Wing Corridor Panels, E-Wing 2nd Floor, B-Wing Basement, and C-Wing Basement3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20215Electrical Safety Audit – Energy ControlNFPA 70E 2018ReferenceRequirementObservationsRecommendation or Notes120.2 p.20The employer has a lockout/tagoutprogramCompliant120.2 (B)(1)p.20All persons who may be exposed directlyor indirectly to a source of electricalpower are involved in the lockout/tagoutprocessAll persons who could be exposed oraffected by the lockout/tagout aretrained in the lockout/tagout programNoncompliantABC COMPANY has a detailed energy controlprocedure. The organization has furtherprovided detailed procedures for more complexprocesses. Each procedure was not audited indetail.The procedure requires that the supervisor beresponsible but does not indicate “how” thisrequirement is achieved. Feedback/clarificationrequired.Department Responsibilities #6. Annual trainingis provided to authorized employees who arealso affected employees.120.2 (B)(2)p.20120.2 (B)(4)(a)p.20120.2(B)(4)(b) p.20120.2 (B)(7)p.20The employer had documented eachemployee has received training inlockout/tagoutDocumentation contains the content ofthe training, the employee’s name, anddates of the trainingDocumentation is made after employeesdemonstrate that they are proficient inthe lockout/tagout practiceThe lockout/tagout device is unique andreadily identifiable as a pliantCompliantCompliance to beverified120.2 (C)(1)p.20The employer provides lockout/tagouttrainingCompliant –possibleimprovement120.2 (C)(3)p.20The lockout/tagout procedure is auditedannually and includes inspecting alockout/tagout procedure in progressnoting detailsPartiallycompliant(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223Evidence of training records were unavailable toaudit.Further, evidence that contractors are coveredunder this clause should be provided.Although the team mentioned that this is inplace, documented evidence should be providedin future.The Demonstration of Skills for LOTO filecompiled of the NetLearning program iscommendableLockout padlocks are colored blue and have aunique key.Team suggested that the lockout box used at theboilers be cross checked for inclusion in the SAFLockout Tagout Policy.PowerPoint training is available, however, GAPtraining for new recruits doesn’t appear to bementioned in the existing SAF Lockout TagoutPolicy.Although demonstration of skills is observedannually, it appears that the SAF Policy is onlyreviewed once every three years through theOSHA VPP. Last reviewed 03/16www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20216 Continued: Energy ControlNFPA 70E 2018ReferenceRequirementObservationsRecommendation or Notes120.2(D)(2)(e) p.21The complex lockout/tagout plansidentify the method to account for allpersons who might be exposed toelectrical hazards, whether directly orindirectly, in the course of thelockout/tagoutNoncompliant120.2 (E)(5)p.22Employees have up-to-date single linediagrams to ensure that no electricalcircuit interlock operation can result inreenergizing the circuit being worked onNoncompliant120.2 (F) p.22The lockout/tagout procedure isavailable to all employeesThe employer provides an effectivemeans of locating all sources of energywhen single line drawings are out of dateNoncompliant“Special Procedures”: Group LOTO 3.i and 3iiaddress identifying the group members but failto identify the method of achieving this. The SAFLOTO form has space to fill in affectedemployees names, but this is not clearly stated inthe group / complex lockout section in the SAFPolicyEmployees have indicated that tracing electricalsources is time intensive and difficult to tracethough walls and partitions. This exposes toorganization to human factor elements, anunnecessary risk to the business.Cannot be verified.The lockout/tagout procedure identifiesthe person who performs the switchingand where and how to de-energize theelectrical equipment or circuitNoncompliant120.2 (F)(1)(a)p.22120.2 (F)(2)(a)p.22(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 FaxNoncompliant3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223Employees rely on labeling for the identificationof equipment. Where labels do not exist,physical tracing of circuits takes place, but theseare undocumentedUnaware of whether such a procedure exists.www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20217Electrical Safety Audit – Compliance AuditNFPA 70E 0.1(A) p.15Employer has a written safety programCompliant110.1(H) p.16Before starting work on electricalequipment an employee in charge isidentified and conducts a job briefingCompliantAlthough a written electrical safety program exists,the employer should ensure communication anddissemination of this information. The workpractices required in the ESP should be reviewedand audited annually.Take Five JSA policy exists. Recommend thatexamples of the different probabilities be providedto help workers understand the risk in a oruniformed manner110.2(A) p.16Safety Training; For those that faceelectrical hazards and risksCompliantNetLearning transcripts provided110.2(B) p.16Type of Training; OJT or formalCompliantFormal training110.2(C)(3) p.16The employer verifies annually thatemployee training required by Section110.2(C) is currentCompliantElectrical Safety Training is documented throughthe NetLearning Program and managed by theWorkforce Development Department on an annualschedule.110.2(C)(4) p.16The employer documents that thetraining in Section 110.2 has occurred110.2(D)(1) p.16Qualified Person: Skills demonstrationNoncompliant110.2(D)(1)(b)(4)(a) p.17110.2(D)(1)(b)(4)(b) p.17Trained in the ability to identify electricalhazardsTrained in the ability to assess electricalrisksCompliantNeed to develop a competency matrix and ensurethat a demonstration of skills procedure isformalized. This activity should also allow forvarious levels of qualification and the reservationof work in line with demonstrated skills.Take five JSA TrainingCompliante-Hazard Electrical Safety Training110.2(D)(1)(d)p.17Employees are trained on tasksperformed once per year before workbeginsNoncompliantNo system in place to track which worker hasperformed what task in the past year(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20218 Continued: Compliance Audit110.2(D)(1)(e)p.17Employees trained in selectingappropriated test instrument anddemonstrate that that they know how touse the device to verify the absence ofvoltage and can interpret indicationsNoncompliant110.2(D)(1)(e)p.17Trained in all limitations of each testinstrument usedNoncompliant110.2(D)(1)(f) p.17Supervisors inspect the work ofemployees to determine compliance withSafety Program and 70E on an annualbasis.NoncompliantRecommendation: Develop Electrical SkillsDemonstration checklist110.2(D)(2) p.17Unqualified Persons are trained in anyelectrical safety practices for their safetyCompliantBiomedical and fire stop department trained onthe low voltage refresher class. Risk assessmentrequired to identify all unqualified persons such asInformation Services.110.2(D)(3) p.17Retraining every three yearsCompliantWorkforce Development Section – after trainingrequirements is uploaded to NetLearning110.2(D)(3) p.17Retraining implemented with observednon-compliance with safety program,new technology, new types ofequipment, changes in safety relatedwork practices, and safety related workpractices not normally usedEmployer documents the training andretains recordsNoncompliantVerbal indication from leadership is that this typeof training is sometime provided and sometimesnot provided. It is recommended that the projectmanager ties this type of training to the ) p.18Only qualified persons use testinstruments and equipmentNoncompliantQualified worker program not establish110.4(A)(2) p.18Test Instruments and equipment; Multimeters are Cat III/1000 v or Cat IV/600voltsCompliantRandomized visual inspection performed.110.4(A)(4) p.18Test leads, instruments, and equipmentare checked visually before useNoncompliantVisual observation – worker did not inspect testleads110.2(E) p.17(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223Although employees have been trained on generalsafety, voltmeter training has not taken place.From the visual observation audit of “testing”, thework practices were not adequate. It isrecommended that this skill be observed anddocumented.Observations/comments: Voltmeter trainingshould be undertakenwww.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 20219 Continued: Compliance Audit110.4(A)(4) p.18Test leads, instruments, and equipmentare tagged out and removed from serviceif found defectiveNoncompliantNo system exists at present110.4(A)(4) p.18Only Qualified persons repair any defectsfound on test instruments andequipmentPartiallycompliantThere is an external party that tests the meter. Thechallenge is that there is no formal system toensure that all meters are tested.110.4(A)(5) p.18Voltage detector tested by “Live-DeadLive” TestNoncompliantNo program implemented as yet to verify thisactivity, although it was communicated verballythat it does occur.110.4(B)(1) p.18Plug and cord connected equipmentstored properlyNoncompliantAreas of non-compliance observed during site visit(Vacuum in basement substation)110.4(B)(2)(a)p.18Plug and cord connected equipment: Allcords have equipment ground conductorCompliantRandom visual inspection performed.110.4(B)(2)(b)p.18Receptacles and plugs not damagedCompliantRandom visual inspection performed.110.4(B)(4) p.19Job locations with water, etc., GFCI’s inuseCompliantIn practice but not documented. Locations auditedonce every six months (Environmental Tour Audit)looking for such items specifically.110.4(C)(1)p.19GFCI’s used on extension cords duringconstruction, maintenance, remodeling,repair of buildings, structures orequipmentPartiallycompliantTeam indicated that it is being done and it isincluded in the ESP – formal audits have startedbut it is not comprehensive across all installations.110.4(C)(1)p.19Portable GFCI’s usedPartiallycompliantProcured ten units already and will be buying morein the future.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202110 Continued: Compliance Audit130.2(A) p.24Energized Work Permitted? If so, underwhat conditions?UncertainUsed: Emergency power installed at registration.The EEWP was not audited. Pete Keller to audit asper guidelines supplied by the auditor.130.4(B) p.25Shock Protection Boundaries areobservedCompliantObserved at A1 Boiler Room130.5 p.26Arc flash risk assessment has beenperformedNoncompliantArc flash assessment is incomplete and certainlabels are not per specification.130.5(2) p.26Arc Flash Risk Assessment is reviewedperiodically not exceeding five yearsNoncompliantLabels and study outdated130.5(3) p.26Arc Flash Risk Assessment takes intoconsideration the condition ofequipment maintenanceNoncompliant130.6(A)(3) p.28Employees are alerted for any changes inthe scope of the job or taskComplaintAudit of maintenance programs on equipment isnot performed. The team did indicate thatinfrared thermal imaging scans are performed andmore detailed maintenance is planned in 2018,however, not all equipment is under amaintenance program.Stop work policy exists but this has not beenaudited.130.6(B) p.28Blind Reaching not permittedUncertainTeam unaware of areas where blind reachingwould be possible130.6(C)(1) p.27Illumination for and around electricalequipment sufficient to perform worksafelyTo becompletedTeam advised to audit illumination when first usingnewly rolled out face shields130.6(D) p.28Conductive Articles are not permitted tobe worn within the Restrictive ApproachBoundaryNoncompliantWorker belt buckles should be considered togetherwith metal safety eyeglasses.130.6(H) p.29Clear spaces are maintainedNoncompliantSee pictures taken from basement substation(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202111 Continued: Compliance Audit130.7(C)(7)(a)p.30Employees wear rubber insulating glovesand leather protectors when crossing theRestrictive Approach BoundaryPartiallycompliantNot observed through work practice inspections.During the once off observation, worker did notuse the glove. It is recommended that ABCCOMPANY implement a glove program130.7(C)(8) p.30EH footwear is worn in dry conditionsIn progressProgram being rolled out at present.130.7(C)(9)(c)p.31Underclothing is flammable, non-meltingapparel; underlayer of meltable fibersare not permitted to be wornNoncompliantFound electrician using PolycottonTable130.7(C)(15)(A)(a) p.37Is electrical equipment installed inaccordance with applicable industrycodes and standards and themanufacturer’s recommendations?NoncompliantNot every installation is checked by an NECinspector or double checked to manufacturer’sinstructions. For e.g. Mobile MRI / Mobile CathTable130.7(C)(15)(A)(a) p.37Is electrical equipment maintained inaccordance with the manufacturer’srecommendations and applicableindustry codes and standards?CompliantMarch 18. 2018 planned maintenance operate,clean, tighten, and lubrication program on 12.47kVand 480V breakers. Every 2 years IR scan. Transferswitches cleaned every year.130.7(D)(1) p.40Insulated tools are used when crossingthe Restricted Approach BoundaryCompliantHas not been audited, although insulated tools areavailable for use. Tools meet IEC 60900 and notASTM F1505.130.7(D)(1)(c)p.41Ropes and handlines used within the LABare non-conductiveNot applicableNo areas requiring ropes near energized parts,130.7(D)(1)(e)p.41Portable ladders have nonconductiveside railsCompliantPortable ladders are all fiberglass130.7(E)(2) p.41Barricade Tape and other barricades areplaced at the outermost boundary,whether shock of arc flashCompliantVisually inspected130.7(E)(2) p.41Barricade Tape gives warning of thehazardCompliantYellow plastic barricades are used. See pictures130.7(E)(3) p.41Attendants are used if signs andbarricades do not provide sufficientwarningCompliantIndicated by the team(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202112 Continued: Compliance Audit130.9 p.43Underground Electrical Lines andEquipment are located before excavationCompliantGround penetrating radar used for detectingservices. To be included with engineering technicalspecifications205.10 p.44Identification of Components andequipment is securely attached andmaintained in a legible conditionCompliantStickers peeling off on a panel and onecontradicting label observed. However, all otherpanels are labels and the labels appeared to be ingood condition.205.2 p.44Single Line Diagrams are maintained inan updated condition and are legible.NoncompliantNot updated205.5 p.44Spaces about electrical equipmentcomply with the NECNoncompliantObserved panel close to wall and storagenoncompliant with OSHA requirements.205.6 p.44Grounding and Bonding continuity ismaintained continuousNoncompliantNo grounding and bonding test are performed.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202113ConclusionThe audit was performed with the understanding that ABC COMPANY has just recently adopted certainelectrical safety work practices. As these safe work practices are implemented by the employees, moredetailed audits should follow. There are several methods that can be used to resolve the noncompliantobservations presented in this report. It is recommended that ABC COMPANY discusses possible solutions andprioritizes the order in which these solutions are implemented.An updated audit should be performed once the NFPA 70E – 2018 Standard is implemented at ABC COMPANY.In the interim, it is recommended that this audit be performed at other departments, including the LaundryDepartment – preferably within the next six months.The following are general recommendation and are considered critical requirements:1. Undertake arc flash engineering study and provide labels. This is an OSHA requirement based on1910.132(d) that requires the employer to identify the electrical hazard and provide PPE. This sectionfurther requires that the workplace hazard (arc flash) be documented and certified [1910.132(d)(2)].2. Provide written guideline covering the:a. Glove Programb. Electrical drawings and arc flash engineering study updates when projects with electrical partsare planned, executed, and completedc. Demonstration of skills to determine Qualified Electrical Worker3. Ground Grid assessment and testA follow up audit should be performed in 2019 at the Maintenance Department at ABC COMPANY.Audit report compiled by:Zarheer JoomaElectrical Engineer Pr. Eng. SMIEEE SMSAIEEZarheer@e-Hazard.com(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202114Appendix: Pictures form the Site AuditImage Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 1: ARC FLASH LABELING INADEQUATEThis picture shows the main breaker section labeled but the downstream sections are not labeled with the arcflash and shock risk assessment details. Generally, the downstream breakers will have a lower arc flash energy.It should also be noted that arc rated PPE above 55 cal/cm2 is available, however, the existing labels indicated“No PPE Found”.Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 2: ARC FLASH LABELING OUT OF DATEThis picture shows the arc flash study was performed in 2012. The plant indicated that no study has beenperformed since. This violates the NFPA 70E - 2018 five-year review cycle of the arc flash hazard analysis.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 202115Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 3: PANEL DOOR LEFT AJARPanel doors should be closed to prevent unnecessary hazard exposure to personnel and ensure the dustingress of the panel.Images Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 4: STORAGE AROUND ELECTRICAL PANELSSeveral examples of storage or items located within 36 inches of electrical equipment which is prohibited byOSHA and the NFPA 70E - 2018.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 2021Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 5: PANEL CLEARANCESPanel clearances not maintained in line with the NEC, OSHA, and the NFPA 70E - 2018 requirements.Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 6: INCORRECT LABELINGA panel rated at 12.47kV is labelled as 480V.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com16

April 23, 2021Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 7: BARRICADINGGood practice of barricading.Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 8: PANEL OPENINGSAll opening on panels and motor control centers must be covered. This is an NEC requirement.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com17

April 23, 2021Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 9: PANEL LABEL ATTACHMENTSPlant inspections should identify labels that are peeling off and replace with engraved labels.Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 10: HAND WRITTEN PANEL LABELSHand written panel labels are prohibited by the NEC.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com18

April 23, 202119Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 11: TRANSFORMER LABELSThe red labels on the electrical panels are commendable. It is not required that transformers be labeled dueto the dual hazard differing at each of the windings.Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPICTURE 12: VOLTAGE INDICATION LAMPSVoltage indication lamps have failed indicating a false absence of voltage. It is recommended that these bereplaced with multiple LEDs for each phase.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville, KY 40223www.e-hazard.cominfo@e-hazard.com

April 23, 2021Image Removed Due toConfidentialityPicture 13: No arc flash and shock labelsSeveral panels and disconnects are found to not have the arc flash and shock risk assessment labels.(502) 716-7073 Office(502) 371-6300 Fax3018 Eastpoint ParkwayLouisville,

a focus on electrical safety. This was the first electrical safety audit performed at the department after an updated Electrical Safety Program (ESP) was rolled out in and electrical safety training offered to certain employees. Personal protective equipment for shock and arc

Related Documents:

The quality audit system is mainly classified in three different categories: i Internal Audit ii. External Audits iii. Regulatory Audit . Types Of Quality Audit. In food industries all three audit system may be used to carry out 1. Product manufacturing audit 2. Plant sanitation/GMP audit 3. Product Quality audit 4. HACCP audit

INTERNAL AUDIT Example –Internal audit report [Short Client Name] Internal Audit Report Rev. [Rev Number] STEP ONE: Audit Plan Process to Audit (Audit Scope): Audit Date(s): Lead Auditor: Audit #: Auditor(s): Site(s) to Audit: Applicable Clauses of [ISO 9001 or AS9100] S

4.1 Quality management system audit 9.2.2.2 Quality management system audit - except: organization shall audit to verify compliance with MAQMSR, 2nd Ed. 4.2 Manufacturing process audit 9.2.2.3 Manufacturing process audit 4.3 Product audit 9.2.2.4 Product audit 4.4 Internal audit plans 9.2.2.1 Internal audit programme

a GHS hazard class and category. Signal Words: "Danger" or "Warning" are used to emphasize hazards and indicate the relative level of severity of the hazard, assigned to a GHS hazard class and category. Hazard Statements: Standard phrases assigned to a hazard class and category that describe the nature of the hazard.

Electrical Infrastructure includes an electrical installation, electrical equipment, electrical line or associated equipment for an electrical line. 1.9 Electrical installation As per the Electrical Safety Act 2002 (s15) (a) An electrical installation is a group of items of electrical equipment that—

CHAPTER 12 Internal Audit Charters and Building the Internal Audit Function 273 12.1 Establishing an Internal Audit Function 274 12.2 Audit Charter: Audit Committee and Management Authority 274 12.3 Building the Internal Audit Staff 275 (a) Role of the CAE 277 (b) Internal Audit Management Responsibilities 278 (c) Internal Audit Staff .

Internal Audit Boot Camp Session 2: Phases of an Audit Program . IA Boot Camp 03/17/21 National Indian Gaming Commission Page 17 of 26 . It is important to understand and include audit steps within your audit program. Audit steps can be updated and created during the planning phase. Audit steps provide the auditor with the proper guidance to

The computational anatomy of psychosis hypothesis that the mean is zero. The sample mean provides evi-dence against the null hypothesis in the form of a prediction error: namely, the sample mean minus the expectation under the null hypothesis. The sample mean provides evidence against the null but how much evidence? This can only be quantified in relation to the precision of the prediction .