AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION STANDARDS OF MEDICAL CARE IN .
TH E J O U R NAL O F C LI N ICA L A N D A PPLI ED R ESEA RC H A N D EDU CATI O NVOLUME 40 SUPPLEMENT 1WWW.DIABETES.ORG/DIABETESCARELEME1TA M E R I C A N D I A B E T E S A S S O C I AT I O NPPNSUJANUARY 2017STANDARDS OFMEDICAL CAREIN DIABETES—2017ISSN 0149-5992
American Diabetes AssociationStandards ofMedical Care inDiabetesd2017
January 2017 Volume 40, Supplement 1[T]he simple word Care may suffice to express [the journal’s] philosophicalmission. The new journal is designed to promote better patient care byserving the expanded needs of all health professionals committed to the careof patients with diabetes. As such, the American Diabetes Association viewsDiabetes Care as a reaffirmation of Francis Weld Peabody’s contention that“the secret of the care of the patient is in caring for the patient.”—Norbert Freinkel, Diabetes Care, January-February 1978EDITOR IN CHIEFWilliam T. Cefalu, MDASSOCIATE EDITORSEDITORIAL BOARDGeorge Bakris, MDLawrence Blonde, MD, FACPAndrew J.M. Boulton, MDDavid D’Alessio, MDMary de Groot, PhDEddie L. Greene, MDFrank B. Hu, MD, MPH, PhDSteven E. Kahn, MB, ChBDerek LeRoith, MD, PhDRobert G. Moses, MDStephen Rich, PhDMatthew C. Riddle, MDJulio Rosenstock, MDWilliam V. Tamborlane, MDKatie Weinger, EdD, RNJudith Wylie-Rosett, EdD, RDNicola Abate, MDVanita R. Aroda, MDGeremia Bolli, MDJohn B. Buse, MD, PhDRobert J. Chilton, DO, FACC, FAHAKenneth Cusi, MD, FACP, FACEParesh Dandona, MD, PhDJ. Hans DeVries, MD, PhDEle Ferrannini, MDFranco Folli, MD, PhDMeredith A. Hawkins, MD, MSRichard Hellman, MDNorbett Hermanns, PhD, MScGeorge S. Jeha, MDIrl B. Hirsch, MD, MACPLee M. Kaplan, MD, PhDM. Sue Kirkman, MDIldiko Lingvay, MD, MPH, MSCSHarold David McIntyre, MD, FRACPAMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION OFFICERSCHAIR OF THE BOARDDavid A. DeMarco, PhDPRESIDENT, MEDICINE & SCIENCEAlvin C. Powers, MDPRESIDENT, HEALTH CARE & EDUCATIONBrenda Montgomery, RN, MSHS, CDESECRETARY/TREASURERUmesh VermaCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERKevin L. HaganThe mission of the American Diabetes Associationis to prevent and cure diabetes and to improvethe lives of all people affected by diabetes.Maureen Monaghan, PhD, CDEKristen J. Nadeau, MD, MSKwame Osei, MDKevin A. Peterson, MD, MPH, FRCS(Ed),FAAFPJonathan Q. Purnell, MDPeter Reaven, MDRavi Retnakaran, MD, MSc, FRCPCHelena Wachslicht Rodbard, MDElizabeth Seaquist, MDGuntram Schernthaner, MDDavid J. Schneider, MDNorbert Stefan, MDJan S. Ulbrecht, MB, BSJoseph Wolfsdorf, MD, BChTien Yin Wong, MBBS, FRCSE, FRANZCO,MPH, PhDBernard Zinman, CM, MD, FRCPC, FACP
Diabetes Care is a journal for the health care practitioner that is intended toincrease knowledge, stimulate research, and promote better management of peoplewith diabetes. To achieve these goals, the journal publishes original research onhuman studies in the following categories: Clinical Care/Education/Nutrition/Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology/Health Services Research, EmergingTechnologies and Therapeutics, Pathophysiology/Complications, and Cardiovascularand Metabolic Risk. The journal also publishes ADA statements, consensus reports,clinically relevant review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news or pointsof view. Topics covered are of interest to clinically oriented physicians, researchers,epidemiologists, psychologists, diabetes educators, and other health professionals.More information about the journal can be found online at care.diabetesjournals.org.Copyright 2017 by the American Diabetes Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed inthe USA. Requests for permission to reuse content should be sent to Copyright ClearanceCenter at www.copyright.com or 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923; phone: (978)750-8400; fax: (978) 646-8600. Requests for permission to translate should be sent toPermissions Editor, American Diabetes Association, at permissions@diabetes.org.The American Diabetes Association reserves the right to reject any advertisement forany reason, which need not be disclosed to the party submitting the advertisement.Commercial reprint orders should be directed to Sheridan Content Services,(800) 635-7181, ext. 8065.Single issues of Diabetes Care can be ordered by calling toll-free (800) 232-3472, 8:30 A.M.to 5:00 P.M. EST, Monday through Friday. Outside the United States, call (703) 549-1500.Rates: 75 in the United States, 95 in Canada and Mexico, and 125 for all other countries.PRINT ISSN 0149-5992ONLINE ISSN 1935-5548PRINTED IN THE USADiabetes Care is available online at care.diabetesjournals.org. Please call thenumbers listed above, e-mail membership@diabetes.org, or visit the online journal formore information about submitting manuscripts, publication charges, ordering reprints,subscribing to the journal, becoming an ADA member, advertising, permission to reusecontent, and the journal’s publication policies.Periodicals postage paid at Alexandria, VA, and additional mailing offices.AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION PERSONNEL AND CONTACTSVICE PRESIDENT, PUBLISHEREDITORIAL CONTENT MANAGERMichael EisensteinNancy C. BaldinoASSOCIATE PUBLISHER,SCHOLARLY JOURNALSTECHNICAL EDITORSChristian S. KohlerOedipa RiceTheresa CooperPHARMACEUTICAL/DEVICE DIGITAL ADVERTISINGEDITORIAL OFFICE DIRECTORLyn ReynoldsASSOCIATE DIRECTOR, BILLING & COLLECTIONSPEER REVIEW MANAGERLaurie Ann HallShannon PottsEDITORIAL ASSISTANTJoan GarrettDonald CrowlHeather Norton BlackburnCONTENT PRODUCTION MANAGERKelly Newtone-Healthcare SolutionsJohn BurkeChief Revenue Officersales@ehsmail.com(609) 882-8887, ext. 149PHARMACEUTICAL/DEVICE PRINT ADVERTISINGDIRECTOR, MEMBERSHIP/SUBSCRIPTIONSERVICESDIRECTOR, SCHOLARLY JOURNALSADVERTISING SALESSENIOR ADVERTISING MANAGERJulie DeVoss Graffjdevoss@diabetes.org(703) 299-5511The Jackson-Gaeta Group, Inc.B. Joseph Jacksonjoejackson@jacksongaeta.comPaul Nalbandianpaulnalbandian@jacksongaeta.comTina Aulettatinaauletta@jacksongaeta.com(973) 403-7677
January 2017 Volume 40, Supplement 1Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2017S1S3S4S6IntroductionProfessional Practice CommitteeStandards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2017:Summary of Revisions1. Promoting Health and Reducing Disparities inPopulationsDiabetes and Population HealthTailoring Treatment to Reduce DisparitiesS11S33S48S996. Glycemic TargetsS105S114S64S12014. Diabetes Care in the HospitalHospital Care Delivery StandardsGlycemic Targets in Hospitalized PatientsBedside Blood Glucose MonitoringAntihyperglycemic Agents in HospitalizedPatientsHypoglycemiaMedical Nutrition Therapy in the HospitalSelf-management in the HospitalStandards for Special SituationsTransition From the Acute Care SettingPreventing Admissions and ReadmissionsS1288. Pharmacologic Approaches to GlycemicTreatmentPharmacologic Therapy for Type 1 DiabetesPharmacologic Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes13. Management of Diabetes in PregnancyDiabetes in PregnancyPreconception CounselingGlycemic Targets in PregnancyManagement of Gestational Diabetes MellitusManagement of Preexisting Type 1 Diabetesand Type 2 Diabetes in PregnancyPostpartum CarePregnancy and Drug Considerations7. Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2DiabetesAssessmentDiet, Physical Activity, and Behavioral TherapyPharmacotherapyMetabolic Surgery12. Children and AdolescentsType 1 DiabetesType 2 DiabetesTransition From Pediatric to Adult CareAssessment of Glycemic ControlA1C TestingA1C GoalsHypoglycemiaIntercurrent IllnessS5711. Older AdultsNeurocognitive FunctionHypoglycemiaTreatment GoalsPharmacologic TherapyTreatment in Skilled Nursing Facilitiesand Nursing HomesEnd-of-Life Care5. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 DiabetesLifestyle InterventionsPharmacologic InterventionsPrevention of Cardiovascular DiseaseDiabetes Self-management Education and Support10. Microvascular Complications andFoot CareDiabetic Kidney DiseaseDiabetic RetinopathyNeuropathyFoot Care4. Lifestyle ManagementDiabetes Self-management Education and SupportNutrition TherapyPhysical ActivitySmoking Cessation: Tobacco and e-CigarettesPsychosocial IssuesS44S883. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation andAssessment of ComorbiditiesPatient-Centered Collaborative CareComprehensive Medical EvaluationAssessment of Comorbidities9. Cardiovascular Disease and RiskManagementHypertension/Blood Pressure ControlLipid ManagementAntiplatelet AgentsCoronary Heart Disease2. Classification and Diagnosis of DiabetesClassificationDiagnostic Tests for DiabetesCategories of Increased Risk for Diabetes (Prediabetes)Type 1 DiabetesType 2 DiabetesGestational Diabetes MellitusMonogenic Diabetes SyndromesCystic Fibrosis–Related DiabetesPosttransplantation Diabetes MellitusS25S7515. Diabetes AdvocacyAdvocacy Position StatementsS130Professional Practice Committee DisclosuresS132IndexThis issue is freely accessible online at care.diabetesjournals.org.Keep up with the latest information for Diabetes Care and other ADA titles via Facebook (/ADAJournals) and Twitter (@ADA Journals).
Diabetes Care Volume 40, Supplement 1, January 2017S1INTRODUCTIONIntroductionDiabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S1–S2 DOI: 10.2337/dc17-S001Diabetes is a complex, chronic illness requiring continuous medical care withmultifactorial risk-reduction strategiesbeyond glycemic control. Ongoing patientself-management education and supportare critical to preventing acute complications and reducing the risk of long-termcomplications. Significant evidence existsthat supports a range of interventions toimprove diabetes outcomes.The American Diabetes Association’s(ADA’s) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes,” referred to as the “Standards ofCare,” is intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payers, and other interested individuals with the componentsof diabetes care, general treatment goals,and tools to evaluate the quality of care.The Standards of Care recommendationsare not intended to preclude clinical judgment and must be applied in the contextof excellent clinical care, with adjustmentsfor individual preferences, comorbidities,and other patient factors. For more detailed information about management ofdiabetes, please refer to Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1) and MedicalManagement of Type 2 Diabetes (2).The recommendations include screening, diagnostic, and therapeutic actionsthat are known or believed to favorablyaffect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. Many of these interventions havealso been shown to be cost-effective (3).The ADA strives to improve and update the Standards of Care to ensurethat clinicians, health plans, and policymakers can continue to rely on them asthe most authoritative and currentguidelines for diabetes care.ADA STANDARDS, STATEMENTS,AND REPORTSThe ADA has been actively involved inthe development and dissemination ofdiabetes care standards, guidelines, andrelated documents for over 25 years.ADA’s clinical practice recommendationsare viewed as important resources forhealth care professionals who care forpeople with diabetes. ADA’s Standardsof Care, position statements, and scientific statements undergo a formal reviewprocess by ADA’s Professional Practice Committee (PPC) and the Board ofDirectors. Readers who wish to commenton the 2017 Standards of Care are invitedto do so at http://professional.diabetes.org/SOC.Standards of CareStandards of Care: ADA position statement that provides key clinical practicerecommendations. The PPC performs anextensive literature search and updatesthe Standards of Care annually basedon the quality of new evidence.ADA Position StatementA position statement is an official ADApoint of view or belief that contains clinical or research recommendations. Position statements are issued on scientificor medical issues related to diabetes.They are published in the ADA journalsand other scientific/medical publications. ADA position statements are typically based on a systematic review orother review of published literature.Position statements undergo a formalreview process. They are updated every5 years or as needed.ADA Scientific StatementA scientific statement is an official ADApoint of view or belief that may or maynot contain clinical or research recommendations. Scientific statements contain scholarly synopsis of a topic relatedto diabetes. Workgroup reports fall intothis category. Scientific statements arepublished in the ADA journals and otherscientific/medical publications, as appropriate. Scientific statements alsoundergo a formal review process.Consensus ReportA consensus report contains a comprehensive examination by an expert panel(i.e., consensus panel) of a scientific ormedical issue related to diabetes. A consensus report is not an ADA position andrepresents expert opinion only. The category may also include task force andexpert committee reports. The needfor a consensus report arises when clinicians or scientists desire guidance on asubject for which the evidence is contradictory or incomplete. A consensus report is developed following a consensusconference where the controversial issueis extensively discussed. The reportrepresents the panel’s collective analysis, evaluation, and opinion at thatpoint in time based in part on the conference proceedings. A consensus report does not undergo a formal ADAreview process.GRADING OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCESince the ADA first began publishingpractice guidelines, there has been considerable evolution in the evaluation ofscientific evidence and in the development of evidence-based guidelines. In2002, the ADA developed a classificationsystem to grade the quality of scientificevidence supporting ADA recommendations for all new and revised ADA position statements. A recent analysis of theevidence cited in the Standards of Carefound steady improvement in qualityover the past 10 years, with the 2014Standards of Care for the first timehaving the majority of bulleted recommendations supported by A- or B-levelevidence (4). A grading system (Table1) developed by the ADA and modeledafter existing methods was used to clarify and codify the evidence that formsthe basis for the recommendations. ADArecommendations are assigned ratingsof A, B, or C, depending on the quality“Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” was originally approved in 1988. Most recent review/revision: December 2015. 2017 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit,and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/content/license.
S2IntroductionDiabetes Care Volume 40, Supplement 1, January 2017Table 1—ADA evidence-grading system for “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes”Level ofevidenceDescriptionAClear evidence from well-conducted, generalizable randomized controlled trialsthat are adequately powered, includingc Evidence from a well-conducted multicenter trialc Evidence from a meta-analysis that incorporated quality ratings in theanalysisCompelling nonexperimental evidence, i.e., “all or none” rule developed by theCentre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of OxfordSupportive evidence from well-conducted randomized controlled trials that areadequately powered, includingc Evidence from a well-conducted trial at one or more institutionsc Evidence from a meta-analysis that incorporated quality ratings in theanalysisBSupportive evidence from well-conducted cohort studiesc Evidence from a well-conducted prospective cohort study or registryc Evidence from a well-conducted meta-analysis of cohort studiesSupportive evidence from a well-conducted case-control studyCSupportive evidence from poorly controlled or uncontrolled studiesc Evidence from randomized clinical trials with one or more major or three ormore minor methodological flaws that could invalidate the resultsc Evidence from observational studies with high potential for bias (such ascase series with comparison with historical controls)c Evidence from case series or case reportsConflicting evidence with the weight of evidence supporting therecommendationEExpert consensus or clinical experienceof evidence. Expert opinion E is a separate category for recommendations inwhich there is no evidence from clinicaltrials, in which clinical trials may be impractical, or in which there is conflictingevidence. Recommendations with an Arating are based on large well-designedclinical trials or well-done meta-analyses.Generally, these recommendationshave the best chance of improving outcomes when applied to the populationto which they are appropriate. Recommendations with lower levels of evidence may be equally important butare not as well supported. Of course,evidence is only one component ofclinical decision making. Clinicians carefor patients, not populations; guidelinesmust always be interpreted with theindividual patient in mind. Individualcircumstances, such as comorbid andcoexisting diseases, age, education, disability, and, above all, patients’ valuesand preferences, must be consideredand may lead to different treatment targets and strategies. Furthermore, conventional evidence hierarchies, such asthe one adapted by the ADA, may missnuances important in diabetes care. Forexample, although there is excellent evidence from clinical trials supportingthe importance of achieving multiplerisk factor control, the optimal way toachieve this result is less clear. It is difficult to assess each component ofsuch a complex intervention.References1. American Diabetes Association. MedicalManagement of Type 1 Diabetes. 6th ed.Kaufman FR, Ed. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 20122. American Diabetes Association. MedicalManagement of Type 2 Diabetes. 7th ed.Burant CF, Young LA, Eds. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 20123. Li R, Zhang P, Barker LE, Chowdhury FM,Zhang X. Cost-effectiveness of interventions toprevent and control diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1872–18944. Grant RW, Kirkman MS. Trends in the evidence level for the American Diabetes Association’s “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes”from 2005 to 2014. Diabetes Care 2015;38:6–8
S3Professional Practice CommitteeDiabetes Care 2017;40(Suppl. 1):S3 DOI: 10.2337/dc17-S002The Professional Practice Committee(PPC) of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) is responsible for the“Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes”position statement, referred to as the“Standards of Care.” The PPC is a multidisciplinary expert committee comprised of physicians, diabetes educators,registered dietitians, and others whohave expertise in a range of areas, including adult and pediatric endocrinology, epidemiology, public health, lipidresearch, hypertension, preconceptionplanning, and pregnancy care. Appointment to the PPC is based on excellencein clinical practice and research. Althoughthe primary role of the PPC is to reviewand update the Standards of Care, it isalso responsible for overseeing the reviewand revision of ADA’s position statementsand scientific statements.The ADA adheres to the Institute ofMedicine Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. Allmembers of the PPC are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest withindustry and/or other relevant organizations. These disclosures are discussedat the onset of each Standards of Care revision meeting. Members of the committee, their employer, and their disclosedconflicts of interest are listed in the“Professional Practice Committee Disclosures” table (see p. S130).For the current revision, PPC memberssystematically searched MEDLINE forhuman studies related to each sectionand published since 1 January 2016. Recommendations were revised based onnew evidence or, in some cases, to clarify the prior recommendation or matchthe strength of the wording to the strengthof the evidence. A table linking the changesin recommendations to new evidencecan be reviewed at http://professional.diabetes.org/SOC. As for all positionstatements, the Standards of Care position statement was approved by theExecutive Committee of ADA’s Boardof Directors, which includes healthcare professionals, sc
The mission of the American Diabetes Association is to prevent and cure diabetes and to improve . Posttransplantation Diabetes Mellitus S25 3. Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and . Diabetes Assessment Diet, Physical Activity, and Behavioral Therapy Pharmacotherapy Metabolic Surgery
Bruce W. Bode, MD, FACE Atlanta Diabetes Associates Atlanta, Georgia American Diabetes Association. Facts and Figures. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/ada/facts.asp. Accessed January 18, 2000. Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes 0.5 - 1.0 Million Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes 10.3 Million Undiagnosed Diabetes 5.4 Million Prevalence of Diabetes in the US 3
American Association of Diabetes Educators American Diabetes Association Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes Children with Diabetes The Endocrine Society Indian Health Service, Division of Diabetes Treatment and Prevention JDRF National Association of Chronic Disease Directors National Association of School Nurses
STANDARDS OF MEDICAL CARE IN DIABETES 2016 . Armand Krikorian, MD, FACE . . Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care . 2016; 39 (Suppl. 1): S13-S22 . minimum of 3 -year intervals is reasonable. C . American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.
Jan 01, 2016 · AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION STANDARDS OF MEDICAL CARE IN DIABETES—2017 S U P P L E M E N 1 T. American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in . EDITORIAL BOARD Nicola Abate, MD Vanita R. Aroda, MD Geremia Bolli, M
minimum of 3-year intervals is reasonable. C Recommendations: Testing for Type 2 Diabetes American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017; 40 (Suppl. 1): S11-S24
Diabetes in the United States More than 29 million people in the U.S. have diabetes 8.1 million people with diabetes are undiagnosed 9.3% of the U.S. population 1.7 million Americans aged 20 years or older were newly diagnosed with diabetes in 2010 Every 19 seconds, someone is diagnosed with diabetes
Clinical Diabetes. 2017 Jan; 35(1)51-54. Speight J, Conn J, Dunning T, Skinner TC, Diabetes Australia. Diabetes Australia position statement. A new language for diabetes: improving communications with and about people with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012 Sep; 97(3): 425- 31.
(CCSS) for Writing, beginning in early elementary, will be able to meet grade-level writing goals, experience success throughout school as proficient writers, demonstrate proficiency in writing to earn an Oregon diploma, and be college and career-ready—without the need for writing remediation. The CCSS describe ―What‖ writing skills students need at each grade level and K-12 Writing .
