AIGA 2006 Survey Of Design Education Programs
AIGA 2006Survey of Design Education ProgramsAIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs1
AIGA 2006Survey of Design Education ProgramsAIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs2
ContentsPurpose4Method5Data Tables6Appendix42 ReadexAIGA 2006ResearchSurvey of Design Education Programs3
PurposeThe findings cited in this report are based on a survey sponsored by AIGA.Through the use of a web–based survey of design educators, the purpose ofthis research project was to provide AIGA with information about U.S. designeducation programs, with the ultimate goal of developing a comprehensivedirectory of such programs.Specific areas of inquiry includeTypes of undergraduate and graduate degrees and majors offered byinstitutions providing design educationThe nature of those degree programs: areas of focus, requirements,enrollment, distance learning options, internship requirements, etc.The composition of design education faculty at those institutions: contractstatus, numbers, teaching assignments, tenure status, etc.AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs4
MethodThe survey sample of 551 was developed by MemberSurvey.com (divisionof Readex Research) METHOD from several list sources provided by AIGA:NASAD program administrators, AIGA educator leaders (including currentand lapsed members, as well as AIGA conference attendees), and educational leader respondents to AIGA’s 2006 Design Educators Salary Survey.Only unduplicated emailable individuals were invited.Data was collected via an adaptive web–based survey from May 2 to June 19,2006; those receiving the invitation emails were also encouraged to forwardthe invitations to other design educators. The survey returned 352 usableresponses (or 64% of the 551 invited, though the number of referred respondents in that total is unknown). As with any research, the results should beinterpreted with the potential of non–response bias in mind. It is unknownhow those who responded to the survey may be different from those whodid not respond. In general, the higher the response rate, the lower the probability of estimation errors due to non–response and thus, the more stablethe results.Percentages based on all 352 responding institutions are subject to a marginof error of 5.1% at the 95% confidence level. Percentages based on smallernumbers of responses (e.g., those offering graduate programs) are subject tomore statistical variation.Please refer to the Appendix for complete details of the survey method.AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs5
Data Tables IndexData Interpretation7Key to Tables8Responding Institutions: Degrees Granted9Institutions Offering Undergraduate Degree(s)FocusesAreas RequiredNumber Graduated In Most Recent YearNumber Enrolled In Most Recent YearOptions For Meeting RequirementsInternship Status101112131415Institutions Offering Graduate Degree(s)FocusesProgram OrientationsNumber Graduated In Most Recent YearNumber Enrolled In Most Recent YearMajority Of CourseworkOptions For Meeting RequirementsInternship Status16171819202122Responding InstitutionsNature Of InstitutionOther Design ProgramsTenure StatusUnion StatusStructure Of Academic Year2324252627Responding InstitutionsNumber Of Full–Time FacultyNumber Of Part–Time FacultyNumber Of Full–Time Faculty Teaching Undergraduate CoursesNumber Of Part–Time Faculty Teaching Undergraduate CoursesNumber Of Full–Time Faculty Teaching Graduate CoursesNumber Of Part–Time Faculty Teaching Graduate CoursesFaculty In Tenure SystemFaculty On Contract BasisFaculty On Term BasisFaculty On Other BasisNumber Of Assistant ProfessorsNumber Of Associate ProfessorsNumber Of ProfessorsNumber Of Other Tenured Faculty2829303132333435363738394041AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs6
Data InterpretationIn addition to percentages, three summary statistics may be presented inthis report for numeric variables:MeanA mean is the arithmetic average of a distribution (i.e., a set of values).Because it is arithmetically calculated, it can be multiplied by the population represented to present a total volume estimate. For example, if 100survey respondents (representing 10,000 people in the population) reportedmean expenditures of 100 each, total expenditures for that population areestimated as 10,000 x 100 1,000,000. Means are very much influencedby extremely large or extremely small values in the distribution (e.g., onemillionaire can substantially raise an estimate of average income). Means forgrouped data are calculated using the midpoint of each range. The lowestvalued group is represented by its largest value; the highest–valued group byits lowest. The standard error measures the variability associated with thesurvey’s estimate of a population mean.Standard errorThe standard error is analogous to the margin of error associated with percentages: that is, 95% of the time we expect the true (unknown) populationmean to be within plus–or–minus two standard errors of the mean calculated from the sample. A standard error that is large in proportion to themean indicates a high level of statistical instability; trending and projectionsagainst such estimates should be undertaken cautiously.MedianA median is the value that lies at the middle of a distribution: that is, 50%of the values are above it and 50% are below. It represents the “typical”response, and is not influenced by extreme values. For most distributions,the median will be either roughly equal to, or significantly smaller than themean. Medians for grouped data are calculated by locating the group whichcontains the 50th percentile, then interpolating between the lower andupper bounds to estimate the precise value. Only the values listed abovethe statistics on a data table are used in the calculations.AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs7
Key to TablesTOTALAll responding institutionsprivate institutionsRespondent report that institution is a private non–profit or privatefor–profit public school, college, or universitytotalAll non–profit or for–profit private: Associate’s colleges (2–year), independent schools or colleges of art & design; Baccalaureate colleges; Master’scolleges or universities; Doctoral/research universitiespublic institutionsRespondent report that institution is a public school, college, or universitytotalAll public institutionsresearch universitiesPublic Doctoral/research universitiesotherAll other public: Associate’s colleges (2–year), independent schools orcolleges of art & design; Baccalaureate colleges; Master’s colleges utionstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherBase: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%of error (95% confidence) 5.1% 8.8% 7.9% 12.0% 10.4%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs8
What degrees in communication design or interaction design does yourinstitution currently grant?Degrees otaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherUndergraduate Degrees (NET)33595%11697%14799%6297%85100%Undergraduate Certificate298%1311%96%12%89%Associate’s (AA/AAS)5215%1613%2517%00%2529%Bachelor’s (NET)29885%11092%12383%6297%6172%Bachelor’s (BA/BS)13037%5647%5134%1930%3238%Bachelor’s of Fine Arts (BFA)21060%6857%9362%4773%4654%Bachelor’s of Graphic Design or Design(BGD/BDes)247%54%85%711%11%Graduate Degrees (NET)12134%3428%5638%4164%1518%Graduate Certificate93%33%11%12%00%Master’s (NET)11533%3227%5638%4164%1518%Master’s (MA/MS)3911%1412%139%69%78%Master’s of Fine Arts (MFA)8624%1916%4631%3453%1214%Master’s of Graphic Design or Design(MGD/MDes)123%33%53%58%00%Master’s of Design Management (MDM)00%00%00%00%00%Doctorate (PhD)72%33%21%23%00%Indicated one or more34698%120100%149100%64100%85100%No answer62%00%00%00%00%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs9
What one option most closely matches the focus of this degree tutionstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherGraphic design, visual communication design,or similar17953%7968%8558%2947%5666%Interaction design, digital media design,or similar5817%2824%2718%813%1922%Combination of both12236%4236%6846%3353%3541%Something else7221%2824%3423%1118%2327%Indicated one or more28986%11498%147100%62100%85100%No answer4614%22%00%00%00%Base: Institutions OfferingUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs10
Which of these areas are represented in the requirements for this degree(if any)?Areas totaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherGraphic design28184%11196%14599%62100%8398%Interactive media design21865%8977%11176%4877%6374%Information design17653%7060%9061%4369%4755%Time–based media design16449%6556%8659%4065%4654%Design planning or %6657%6746%2134%4654%Experience design9027%3429%4933%2439%2529%Other inary7322%2925%3423%1219%2226%Indicated one or more28786%11397%147100%62100%85100%No answer4814%33%00%00%00%Base: Institutions offeringUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs11
In your most recently completed academic year, approximately how manystudents were in this degree program and Graduated with this major?Number Graduated In ltotalresearchuniversitiesother100 or %11%00%11%No answer6219%87%43%00%45%MeanStandard .05.524Base: Institutions offeringUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs12
In your most recently completed academic year, approximately how manystudents were in this degree program enrolled (but not yet graduated withthis as a major)?Number Enrolled In ltotalresearchuniversitiesother500 or 00%00%00%No answer9528%1816%2215%610%1619%MeanStandard 13.4120167.923.3100Base: Institutions offeringUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs13
Is it possible for a student to complete any of the requirements of thisdegree program through distance learning and/or off–site options (otherthan summer school and study abroad)?Options For irements can be fully met with off–siteand/or distance learning options82%43%21%00%22%Requirements can be partially met withoff–site and/or distance learning options9328%3429%4732%1829%2934%Off–site and/or distance learning optionscannot be used to meet requirements19558%7968%10471%4573%5969%Indicated one or more28184%11297%14599%62100%8398%No answer5416%43%21%00%22%Base: Institutions offeringUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs14
What is this degree program’s status regarding professional designinternships?Internship taltotalresearchuniversitiesotherInternship is required, and programcoordinates placement7623%3934%3020%1423%1619%Internship is required, but programdoes not coordinate placement3310%1311%1712%46%1315%Internship is encouraged, and programcoordinates placement11434%4337%6242%2540%3744%Internship is encouraged, but programdoes not coordinate placement9629%3732%4833%2235%2631%Internship is neither requirednor encouraged3510%1311%1913%58%1416%Indicated one or more28585%11397%147100%62100%85100%No answer5015%33%00%00%00%Base: Institutions offeringUndergraduate Degree(s)335100%116100%147100%62100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs15
What one option most closely matches the focus of this degree tutionstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherGraphic design, visual communication design,or similar4638%1441%3054%2254%853%Interaction design, digital media design,or similar2319%1132%1120%717%427%Design planning and management,creative industries, or similar32%13%12%12%00%Design processes and methods,design thinking, or similar1815%39%1425%1127%320%Collaborative, cross–disciplinary studies2319%824%1323%922%427%Something else1815%1029%814%512%320%Indicated one or more9276%3294%56100%41100%15100%No answer2924%26%00%00%00%Base: Institutions OfferingGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs16
Which one of these best characterizes this degree program?Program ionstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherGeneral applied practice orientationresembling professional practice2319%1338%1018%717%320%Specialized practice orientation,Designer as Author2924%1132%1629%1332%320%Specialized practice orientation,Social Model of Design54%26%24%12%17%Specialized practice orientation,Invention of Visual Form119%26%713%512%213%Specialized practice orientation,other3126%926%2239%1434%853%Academic research orientation1311%412%916%615%320%Indicated one or more9276%3294%56100%41100%15100%No answer2924%26%00%00%00%Base: Institutions OfferingGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs17
In your most recently completed academic year, approximately how manystudents were in this degree program and graduated with this major?Number Graduated In ltotalresearchuniversitiesother25 or %No answer3428%39%35%00%320%MeanStandard ase: Institutions OfferingGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs18
In your most recently completed academic year, approximately how manystudents were in this degree program enrolled (but not yet graduated) withthis as a major?Number Enrolled In ltotalresearchuniversitiesother50 or %None54%00%47%25%213%No answer3731%515%35%25%17%MeanStandard 3.26Base: Institutions offeringGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs19
Which option best describes the majority of the graduate coursework thatstudents are exposed to?Majority Of ng, graduate–only courses4940%2059%2952%2459%533%Graduate courses cross–listedwith undergraduate courses3025%926%1934%1332%640%Independent Indicated one or more9074%3294%5598%4098%15100%No answer3126%26%12%12%00%Base: Institutions OfferingGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs20
Is it possible for a student to complete any of the requirements of thisdegree program through distance learning and/or off–site options (otherthan summer school and study abroad)?Options For irements can be fully met withoff–site and/or distance learning options32%26%12%00%17%Requirements can be partially met withoff–site and/or distance learning options2117%618%1323%1229%17%Off–site and/or distance learning optionscannot be used to meet requirements6554%2471%3970%2663%1387%Indicated one or more8873%3294%5395%3893%15100%No answer3327%26%35%37%00%Base: Institutions OfferingGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs21
What is this degree program’s status regarding professional designinternships?Internship taltotalresearchuniversitiesotherInternship is required, and programcoordinates placement54%412%00%00%00%Internship is required, but programdoes not coordinate placement22%13%12%00%17%Internship is encouraged, andprogram coordinates placement1916%1029%916%922%00%Internship is encouraged, but programdoes not coordinate placement2823%1338%1425%1127%320%Internship is neither requirednor encouraged4537%1029%3359%2151%1280%Indicated one or more9074%3294%5598%4098%15100%No answer3126%26%12%12%00%Base: Institutions offeringGraduate Degree(s)121100%34100%56100%41100%15100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs22
Which one option most closely matches the nature of your institution?Nature Of onstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesotherPublic Associate’s college (2–year)247%00%2416%00%2428%Private Associate’s college (2–year)41%43%00%00%00%Public independent school orcollege of art & design21%00%21%00%22%Private non–profit independent school orcollege of art & design278%2723%00%00%00%Private for–profit independent school orcollege of art & design93%98%00%00%00%Public Baccalaureate college195%00%1913%00%1922%Private non–profit Baccalaureate college226%2218%00%00%00%Private for–profit Baccalaureate college154%1513%00%00%00%Public Master’s college or university4011%00%4027%00%4047%Private non–profit Master’s college oruniversity237%2319%00%00%00%Private for–profit Master’s college oruniversity82%87%00%00%00%Public Doctoral/research university6418%00%6443%64100%00%Private non–profit e for–profit %00%00%00%00%No answer7321%00%00%00%00%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs23
Other than the program(s) you have just reported on, are there any othercommunication design and/or interaction design programs at (your campusof) your institution?Other Design 32%2031%2732%No18853%8168%10067%4367%5767%No answer8123%65%21%12%11%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs24
Does your institution grant tenure?Tenure 93%6398%7689%No5816%5143%75%00%78%No answer8223%54%32%12%22%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs25
Does faculty at your institution work under a union contract?Union 248%3758%3541%No answer8424%54%43%23%22%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs26
How is your institution’s academic year structured?Structure OfAcademic 72%13188%5688%7588%Other62%65%00%00%00%No answer8123%43%32%12%22%Base: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs27
How many of the faculty members teaching in the design program(s) youhave described are employed by your institution fulltime (even if they do notteach full–time in design), part–time, or on an adjunct basis?Number OfFull–Time otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 1%58%1214%None21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs28
How many of the faculty members teaching in the design program(s) youhave described are employed by your institution full–time (even if they donot teach full–time in design), part–time, or on an adjunct basis?Number OfPart–Time otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother25 or 6%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard se: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs29
How many in each category teach undergraduate design courses?Number Of Full–TimeFaculty TeachingUndergraduate otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 1%46%1214%None21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%No undergraduate offering31%22%11%12%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs30
How many in each category teach undergraduate design courses?Number Of Part–TimeFaculty TeachingUndergraduate otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother25 or 6%No undergraduate offerings31%22%11%12%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard se: Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs31
How many in each category teach graduate design courses?Number Of Full–TimeFaculty TeachingGraduate otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 0%00%No graduate offerings11934%5546%5940%1625%4351%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs32
How many in each category teach graduate design courses?Number Of Part–TimeFaculty TeachingGraduate otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother25 or 11%None267%65%2013%1422%67%No graduate offerings11934%5546%5940%1625%4351%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs33
Of the total number of full–time faculty reported, how many fall into each ofthese categories?Faculty In Tenure taltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 6%None4212%3832%43%00%45%No full–time faculty21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs34
Of the total number of full–time faculty reported, how many fall into each ofthese categories?Faculty On Contract altotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 33%6443%3250%3238%No full–time faculty21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs35
Of the total number of full–time faculty reported, how many fall into each ofthese categories?Faculty On Term altotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 859%4958%No full–time faculty21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs36
Of the total number of full–time faculty reported, how many fall into each ofthese categories?Faculty On Other altotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 859%5059%No full–time faculty21%11%00%00%00%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs37
Of the full–time tenured/tenure–track faculty just reported, how many fallinto each of these categories?Number OfAssistant nstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 76%2416%69%1821%No full–time faculty within tenure system4413%3933%43%00%45%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs38
Of the full–time tenured/tenure–track faculty just reported, how many fallinto each of these categories?Number OfAssociate nstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 1%1210%2517%58%2024%No full–time faculty within tenure system4413%3933%43%00%45%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs39
Of the full–time tenured/tenure–track faculty just reported, how many fallinto each of these categories?Number Of nstotaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 1815%3322%1523%1821%No full–time faculty within tenure system4413%3933%43%00%45%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs40
Of the full–time tenured/tenure–track faculty just reported, how many fallinto each of these categories?Number OfOther Tenured otaltotalresearchuniversitiesother10 or 656%3946%No full–time faculty within tenure system4413%3933%43%00%45%No answer00%00%00%00%00%Answered faculty questions inconsistently9828%3933%5738%2539%3238%Provided no faculty data8524%65%43%12%34%MeanStandard : Responding Institutions352100%120100%149100%64100%85100%AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs41
AppendixSurvey & Research43Method Details44Web–Based Questionnaire45AIGA 2006 Survey of Design Education Programs42
Survey & ResearchMemberSurvey.comMemberSurvey.com (www.MemberSurvey.com) is the division of ReadexResearch that focuses on research for professional, scientific, and tradeassociations. With the growing strategic value of the Internet for membercommunication and membership benefit delivery, MemberSurvey.comseeks to provide associations with Internet research
NASAD program administrators, AIGA educator leaders (including current and lapsed members, as well as AIGA conference attendees), and educa-tional leader respondents to AIGA’s 2006 Design Educators Salary Survey. Only unduplicated emailable individuals were invited. Data was collected via an adaptive web–based survey from May 2 to June 19,
AIGA - Austin Chapter 815-A Brazos St., PMB 549 Austin, TX 78701 www.aigaaustin.org Mission and Goals AIGA's mission is to advance designing as a professional craft, strategic tool and vital cultural force. AIGA is the premier place for design - to discover it, discuss it, understand it, appreciate it, be inspired by it.
AIGA student groups offer aspiring professionals the opportunity to get involved, create community, and build leadership skills. There are more than 200 AIGA student groups at college campuses across the country. AIGA encourages the formation of student groups and is committed to developing these groups as a way of encouraging students to take the
AIGA Aquent Survey of Design Salaries 2008. section Contents introduction Letter from the executive director 2 . Median total cash compensation 2000-2008 11 AIGA design leaders confidence index 14 2008 compEnsation Compensation overview 17 Solo designer 18 Owner, Partner, Principal 20 Creative/Design director 22 Art director 24 Senior .
AIGA Design Educators Salary Survey 2008 www.aiga.org Compensation overview poSition title All full-time design educators saLarY/WaGes saLarY/WaGe comparIson addItIonaL casH suppLementaL Income totaL compensatIon respondents 25tH% medIan 75tH% 25tH% medI
AIGA Unidos—a multi-chapter collaboration which created a space to celebrate the lives, work, stories, and needs of creatives with a Latinx and Hispanic cultural heritage. AIGA Unidos hosted talks throughout Hispanic Heritage Month that were free and open to everyone. AIGA's Design Educators Community (DEC) brought SHIFT
Aiga Ārste-Avotiņa Managing Partner Amrop Riga, Latvia T 371 29 236 717 F 371 67 210 422 E aiga.arste@amrop.com W www.amrop.lv Aiga has been working in executive search business since 1996, when she joined Amrop International in Latvia as a first local
CODE OF PRACTICE ACETYLENE AIGA 022/13 Revision of AIGA 022/05 Asia Industrial Gases Association 3 HarbourFront Place, #09-04 HarbourFront Tower 2, Singapore 099254
Carson-Dellosa CD-104594 2 3 1 Day 1: Day 2: 55 6 10 8 4 5 Day 3:; ; 8; 7
