Mid-project Progress Report - CPSU
Sports Safeguarding Children InitiativeMid-project progress reportChild Protection in Sport Unit
18 UK Sport funded NGBs have started thestandards process (two have met the preliminary level). The Youth Sport Trust has had its initialpre-assessment and is now working towards thepreliminary level. Themed work on safeguarding deaf and disabledchildren produced a briefing for CEOs of NGBs andCSPs. An in-depth CPSU briefing paper hasidentified priorities for resource development tosupport sports bodies to safeguard deaf anddisabled children (see case study one below). All NGBs and CSPs that have attained theAdvanced Standards level are engaged in theSafeguarding Framework including developmentof implementation plans to maintain and embedthese standards. A number of NGBs at the Impact Assessmentstage of the Framework have been supportedthrough student-led and funded research projects,including the impact of parental behaviour and theimpact of safeguarding at club level in RugbyFootball League. Themed work on promoting positive parentalbehaviour will be completed in 2013 and newresources were launched at the CPSU conferencein October 2013.Case studiesCase study one: Safeguarding deaf anddisabled children in sportAssessment of sports bodies against the standardsshowed a clear need for information to be providedabout safeguarding the needs of deaf and disabledchildren. Many of the sports bodies lacked confidencein how to include deaf and disabled children in theirsports and in how to respond to their additionalsafeguarding needs. Following a consultation processthe CPSU initially developed a DVD about includingdisabled children - with the support of Paralympicmedalist Ade Adepitan and a group of young peoplewho talked about their experience of sport. Supportedby a number of sports bodies, including the FootballAssociation, the County Sports Partnership Network,Archery, Sport NI and Special Olympics, the CPSUthen worked to develop and disseminate a newmulti-media learning resource Safeguarding Deaf andDisabled Children in Sport for a UK–wide audience.6Case study two: Involving children andyoung peopleA key theme arising from research, case evidence andfrom both the Standards and Framework assessmentshas been the need for sports bodies to become moreconfident in working in partnership with children andyoung people. Encouragingly, many NGBs now haveyouth forums – which give young people a voice inhow their sport is run.A good example of how these forums can givechildren a voice in sport is the development ofthe Promoting Positive Parental Behaviour toolkitwhich many NGBs, including England Table TennisAssociation; ASA; Rugby Football League; RugbyFootball Union; and England Netball, consultedyoung people on. The CPSU has also worked withyouth forums from England Volleyball, the AmateurSwimming Association (ASA) and the FootballAssociation in the selection part of the SafeguardingStars awards process. The ASA has conductedsurveys with its young people about their safeguardingwork to ensure that their voices are heard. The toolkitlaunched in October 2013.Case study three: Shropshire Telford andWrekin CSP developed a youth forumAnother example is the School Games Youth Forumcreated by Energize Shropshire, Telford and WrekinCounty Sports Partnership to enable young peopleto help plan and shape the Shropshire HomesSchool Sport Festivals (part of the Sainsbury’sSchool Games).Meeting on a monthly basis, the Youth Forum takesresponsibility for several aspects of the Countyfestival, ranging from planning the opening ceremony,to designing competitor t-shirts and launchingmarketing campaigns. Involvement in the forum letsyoung people have their say and gives them thechance to be involved in the planning and organisationof a large scale sporting event.As well as involving young people in the planning andorganisation of the School Sport Festival, Energizehave very effectively used the forum of young peopleto consult on safeguarding matters, from their viewson procedures at the festival to the developmentof new resources and content of safeguardinginformation on publications and websites. Meetingregularly and remaining as a consistent group ofpeople for the academic year it provides the perfectplatform to keep an ongoing dialogue.
Aim twoSafeguarding practice is coordinated throughouta child’s life in sport, from participation to elitelevel, by schools, clubs and sports facilities. Allrecognised NGBs, CSPs and National Partnersare able to access support and expertise toestablish appropriate safeguarding systems, withlearning from and actions based on research:Achievements CPSU contracts are in place between SportEngland, (participation focus), and UK Sport (elitelevel focus) to support NGBs to meet and maintainstandards requirements. Safeguarding support isalso embedded in the School Games programme:at level three through the CSP network and at levelfour through CPSU support to YST. The Youth Sport Trust (YST) is developingsafeguarding guidance for School GamesOrganisers to support their work at level two andthree. This will be through an online tool. YST is developing a safeguarding workshop forthe National School Games Organisers’ Summitin October. CSPs are promoting common safeguardingminimum operating standards in fundedpartnership work between clubs, activity providers,coaches and schools. The development of the new CPSU website,supported by Sport England, aims to providerecognised but non-funded sports with theopportunity to access safeguarding supportto ensure that all children in sport are protected.Six recognised sports, including the Royal LifeSaving Society, British Aikido Board and Surf LifeSaving will pilot the use of new web-based tools inorder to meet the standards. The research and evidence task group hasensured that sports organisations have access tocurrent research. Research institutions are workingdirectly with NGBs and CSPs on projects whichfacilitate learning from sport’s practice such as theframework pilots. In 2011 the University of Edinburgh and theNSPCC published research into children’sexperiences of organised sport in the UK. This hasbeen widely disseminated and has helped thestrategic group to identify future priorities for itsmembers and for the task groups. NGBs and CSPs are supporting the roll out ofsafeguarding practices and minimum operatingstandards to clubs. These include accreditationschemes such as Clubmark: the most importantclub accreditation scheme for sports clubs which is heavily weighted to safeguarding minimumoperating standards.7
In the main young people painted a positive pictureof sport participation. However they also reporteda range of more negative and harmful experiences.Peers were identified as the main perpetrators ofall forms of harm. Emotional harm, body imageand self-esteem together with the additional risksexperienced by talented young athletes arekey areas for further work to be done. The report’smessage about listening to children’s voicesformed the basis of the CPSU conference, Fromcommunity to elite sport - children and youngpeople’s experiences, in October 2013. The research and evidence group is lookingto provide research on new areas of concern. Thisincludes ‘hazing’ which can be described asritualised initiation practices which often involvesinflicting physical and emotional distress such assexual coercion, or forced alcohol consumption. A review of the safeguarding cases managedwithin sport during 2011 was conducted by BrunelUniversity. The findings of this review werepresented at a Lead Welfare Officer Support Forumand a journal paper has been accepted forpublication by Child Abuse Review. Focus groups have been conducted with youngpeople from a range of sports to explore theirperceptions and experiences of parental behaviourin sport. The findings of this research have beenpublished, and were presented at the CPSUconference in October 2013 and published. A project funded by the Rugby Football Union hasinvestigated strategies through which children witha disability can best be safeguarded. The reportwill be published shortly.8Case studiesCase study four: Rugby Union and childvulnerabilities research and action planThe Rugby Football Union (RFU) recognises theadditional vulnerabilities experienced by somechildren when participating in sport. These includedisabled children who research tells us are morevulnerable to abuse than their non-disabled peers.In order to explore how these children can best beincluded, the RFU commissioned Dr Daniel Rhindand Jamie McDermott of Brunel University to explorethrough research the experiences of club safeguardingofficers and managers to highlight good practice.In stage one, a questionnaire was completed by 389safeguarding officers and managers. This revealed that: 83.6 per cent have worked with children withadditional vulnerabilities in rugby union over 30 per cent do so on at least a weekly basis in half of the cases, the vulnerability related tochallenging behaviour it is important that resources are available at thepoint of need.In stage two, in-depth interviews were conductedwith 14 members of this sample to investigate theirexperiences in more depth.Based on this, the TACL (trigger, action plan,communication, learning) approach was developed.The name TACL (or tackle) was chosen to promoteproactive strategies and to provide a label relevantto Rugby Union. This highlights four key phaseswhich should be in place to safeguard children withadditional vulnerabilities, outlined in the table opposite.
TACL phaseDescriptionRecommendationTriggerIdentifying that a child has anadditional vulnerability.Amend the registration form to take a broaderapproach to safeguarding beyond medicalconditions. Emphasise that the focus is on includingrather than excluding children.Action planIdentifying how the child can best beincluded.The CSO consults with the child, parent and coachto highlight key messages. An action plan can becompleted.CommunicationEnsuring that the action plan iscommunicated sensitively to all keystakeholders.The action plan is communicated to all keystakeholders. This should be agreed with the CSOand the parent.LearningIt is important to identify and sharegood practice.Case studies can be disseminated through onlineresources, a newsletter and at existing meetings.This TACL approach will now be rolled out acrossclubs throughout the RFU. Key stakeholders fromthe RFU were involved at all stages of the projectfrom research design through to data collection andanalysis. This project illustrates the benefits of sportsorganisations and researchers working together tocreate practical solutions to real-life challenges.9
Aim threeSport and other organisations understandeach other’s roles and responsibilities andwork in partnership to achieve best outcomesfor children. Sport is part of mainstreamsafeguarding and will be recognised by, andhave access to, government departments andstatutory agencies, from a local to national level. The new and updated Safeguarding and ProtectingChildren workshop and resource has beenproduced and released, including updatedlegislation and best practice guidance.Approximately 200 tutors were re-orientated todeliver the updated workshop. The RiskAssessment in Recruitment training has beenattended by 75 people over the past three years.Achievements Quarterly Lead Officer Support Forums (LOSF) areprovided to NGB and CSP lead safeguardingofficers by the CPSU. The sport sector’s contribution was collated andadded to the review and revision of WorkingTogether to Safeguard Children 2013. The role ofsport and the voluntary sector was recognisedand retained. Sportscoach UK’s Safeguarding and ProtectingChildren workshop has been delivered to 77,220people since 2010. In addition, Safeguarding andProtecting Children 2 has been delivered to 3,058participants, Safeguarding and Protecting Children(16-18) to 644 participants and Keeping Safe inSport (for younger leaders) to 247 young people. 123 people have attended the NSPCC’s Time toListen (TTL) course for national/organisational leadofficers over the last three years. 50 people haveattended the regional course and the club welfareofficer training is being delivered by 12 sportsfollowing trainer orientations by the CPSU. Three NGBs are now delivering training that hasbeen recognised by the CPSU as equivalent to theNSPCC TTL training.10 All key recognised sports safeguarding trainingcourses cover the roles and responsibilities ofstatutory agencies. All CSPs promote and/or facilitate recognisedtraining for coaches and other sports people ona local basis. In 2013 the CPSU provided input to theAssociation of Chief Police Officers’ conferenceand to Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB)events in West Yorkshire and Dudley. Many CSPshave established working links with LSCBs, egEnergize Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin; Oxford;Kent; and Nottingham. The case strategy group has been co-ordinatingaction to develop a national model of bestpractice for the management of children’s cases insport. Audits of a sample of NGB casemanagement systems have now been completed.NGBs will be provided with materials, guidanceand tailored training and consultancy to meetidentified needs.
Working as part of the case strategy group,England Golf has developed a set of investigationdocuments based on processes used in criminalinvestigations. This comprehensive set ofdocuments assists those conducting investigationsin sport to produce professional, comprehensivereports in a recognised, standardised format.The investigation recording forms are used by theNational Safeguarding Panel (NSP) – see case study.Case studies The case strategy group includes a localauthority designated officer (LADO) representative.As well as attending the national LeadSafeguarding Officer forum for NGBs and CSPs totalk about the LADO’s role. The LADO is engagedwith identifying opportunities to promote thesector’s work with local authorities.Over the past 12 years, sports coach UK and theNSPCC’s Child Protection in Sport Unit have beenworking in partnership to produce and deliver aSafeguarding and Protecting Children workshop andsupporting resource that offers the basic level ofsafeguarding and protecting children training that bothorganisations feel all coaches who deliver sessions tochildren should undertake. A National Safeguarding Panel (NSP) has beendeveloped and is managed by Sport Resolutions(see case study).Case study five: Keeping safe in sport:safeguarding for young volunteers 13 Keeping Safe in Sport SPC 13 workshop andresource developed by sports coach UK and pilotedat the 2012 UK School Games events to YSTyoung volunteers.Over 25,000 coaches each year attend the workshopand recent innovations include Safeguarding for16-18 year old workshop and Safeguarding andProtecting Children 2: Reflecting on Practice. Howeverboth organisations felt that there was a gap in thesafeguarding training being offered to the many youngvolunteers in the UK.We hope the solution will be the Keeping Safein Sport: Safeguarding for Young Volunteers 13 workshop. Designed by Sportscoach UK withsupport from the NSPCC’s Child Protection in SportUnit, the workshop is the first of its kind to offer ageappropriate safeguarding information to young peopleoperating in a position of trust. The content coversnot only the safeguarding of children with whomthe young volunteer is working, but also the youngvolunteers themselves, an aspect often overlookedwith children in these roles.The workshop comes with a short A5-sized handbookfor participants and the workshop is two hours long,rather than the traditional three hours for adults - amore realistic time to expect young volunteers toattend and remain fully engaged.11
Case study six: National Safeguarding PanelExpertiseThe National Safeguarding Panel is one of the firstservices developed by the NSPCC led case strategygroup. This was set up to improve case managementsystems, structures and services in the event ofsafeguarding complaints or concerns in sport.The 22-strong NSP is led by family barrister, judgeand safeguarding expert Stephen Bellamy QC. NSPmembers are drawn from a mixture of backgroundsincluding law, policing, social work and offendermanagement. Panel members have expertise ininterviewing witnesses, reviewing evidence, liaisingwith the police and other statutory agencies,managing procedural aspects of a case, safeguardingchildren involved in the process, ensuring fairtreatment of individuals facing allegations, chairinghearings, and writing reasoned decisions and reports.All NSP members also have a strong interest andconnection to sport.BackgroundThe NSP was created to provide sport in the UKwith professional support in managing safeguardingcomplaints and concerns. It brings together expertsin the field to help organisations deal with thecomplex and serious matters that present a risk tochildren and young people, or to sport’s reputation.Initial referrals have dealt with complaints andallegations of previous sexual abuse, groomingbehaviour, emotional bullying of young athletes, andthe possession of computer child abuse images byadults working in sport.ServicesThe NSP provides help in two areas: investigationsand reviews into safeguarding complaints andconcerns, and independent arbitration as analternative to internal NGB disciplinary or appealspanels. Both services work in tandem with NGBsafeguarding systems and policies to provideadditional independence and expertise.12Best practiceThe NSP is committed to promoting and sharing bestpractice. It has created procedural rules for managingsafeguarding hearings and protocols for conductinginvestigations. An annual digest of case studies isalso planned to highlight key issues and learningpoints for sport.Funding and deliveryThe NSP is part funded by UK Sport and is managedby the sport specialist arbitration and mediation bodySport Resolutions UK. Users of the service pay a feeto recompense panel members for their time and forany expenses incurred. Fee levels are graded to makethe NSP accessible and affordable to all organisations.
Aim fourBest practice will be embedded in therecruitment and selection of staff, consultantsand volunteers across the sports sector.Sports bodies will be supported to implementthe changes required to use the government’sDisclosure and Barring Service (DBS).Achievements The Sport and Recreation Alliance and the CPSUrepresented the sector’s views in the consultationprocess prior to key changes in the Protection ofFreedoms Act and the introduction of the DBS. The CPSU has chaired the CRB consultative forumfor the sport and recreation sector since itsinception. The CPSU continues to be the centralpoint of contact with the DBS while stakeholderengagement processes are in transition. The Sport and Recreation Alliance and the CPSUhave provided sport focused guidance, trainingand advice on safe recruitment and criminalrecords checks systems. Model rules for NGBswere jointly commissioned and made availableon both organisations’ websites. Several sectorstakeholder events have been organised topromote the changes. Sportscoach UK has developed minimumoperating standards for active coaches, whichstates its belief that all coaches should undertakea three hour face-to-face safeguarding workshop inthe first instance and renew their training at threeyearly intervals. A multi-agency process is in place to support thedevelopment of revised/new resources to ensurethat the new DBS requirements and systems areincorporated into multi-partner sports activities– particularly those connecting with schools andthe wider education sector.Case study seven: Safe recruitment in sportAll National Governing Bodies and County SportPartnerships that have met the safeguardingstandards have structures and systems in placeto ensure safe recruitment for all those who workwith children in sport. This has been strengthenedthrough training provided by the CPSU and its Riskassessment in safe recruitment training has beenupdated to reflect changes in legislation.The sport and recreation sector consultative grouphas been the voice of sport with the CRB andIndependent Safeguarding Authority (ISA). Thegroup is chaired by the director of the CPSU andattended by representatives across the sector.The sector representative groups have not hadmeetings convened since the changes through theProtection of Freedoms Act and the DBS started.However communication from DBS is still sharedthrough the sector groups. The CPSU and Sport andRecreation Alliance have continued to coordinatesports representatives to lobby and advise onissues concerning safe recruitment, particularly theintroduction of the DBS and changes to practice inimplementing criminal records checks. The CPSU andSport and Recreation Alliance ran an event about DBSon 4 March 2013 and followed this up with guidanceon defining supervision and regulated activity anddeveloped model regulations on managing the13
‘applicant only’ disclosure and using the ‘continuousupdating service’. In addition, the Sport andRecreation Alliance coordinated a multi-sport group todevelop a Safeguarding adults in sport resource pack. Learn from what we are doing and be able tomeasure the impact, sharing knowledge amongall parties to respond to existing and newchallenges in safeguarding.The CPSU continues to liaise closely with all thesports organisations with whom they work to providesupport with this developing area, delivering guidance,training and updates as required. Strengthen the growing partnerships betweenresearch bodies and sport as part of thecontinuous cycle of improvement.What we still need to do: keythemes and action pointsOverarching themes Respond to the messages from the University ofEdinburgh and the NSPCC report. This includes:understanding and addressing the safeguardingneeds of elite young athletes; equipping people insport to be aware of the needs of young people atrisk of self-harm and suicide, and to take action tosupport them. Build the capacity of sports bodies to listen tochildren’s voices – creating opportunities for themto contribute to decisions which affect them, andproviding them with information about who theycan turn to when they have concerns. Improve partnership working between sport andthe statutory sector both at a strategic level, andwhen managing individual child protection cases.This will require the profile of sport’s safeguardingprogress to be made with statutory sector colleagues. Improve the consistency of case managementprocesses through the development of a newmodel of case management and supporting resources. Need to engage statutory agencies with sportsbodies more consistently, demonstrating thatsport’s contribution to safeguarding and promotingthe welfare of children is essential.14 Need to provide safe and enjoyable environmentsfor children and young people that meet minimumoperating standards such as Clubmark or NGBspecific equivalents. Need to have seamless safeguardingarrangements across and between organisationsthat commission and run sports activitiesand events. Sports bodies need to be providedwith practical tools to help them to makesafe arrangements – with particular referenceto implementing the changes required to use theDisclosure and Barring Service.
Membership of strategic group andtask groupsStrategic groupCase management steering groupNick SlinnChild Protection in Sport UnitCarol ChamberlainEngland Golf PartnershipEdward ProcterSport ResolutionsLiz McMahonIndependent chairAmanda QuirkeLocal authority designated officerAnne TiivasChild Protection in Sport UnitColette EdenRugby Football LeagueLeila Al KazwiniSport EnglandKim DoyleIndependent Case ManagementGroup member(replacing SuzanneGlavin)Jemima CoatesUK SportLee MasonCounty Sports Partnership NetworkSteve BoocockWiltshire and Swindon Sport/Framework groupTerry SharpeAssociation of Chief Police OfficersAnne TiivasChild Protection in Sport UnitResearch and evidence groupDr Daniel RhindBrunel UniversityDr Mike HarthillEdgehill Universitysteering groupSally ProudloveChild Protection in Sport UnitClaire HarveyYouth Sport TrustEmma SpringEnglish Federation of Disability SportSteve MitchellSkills ActiveDr Chris PlattsSheffield Hallam UniversityRob SimpsonMartial Arts Safeguarding GroupDr Andy SmithEdgehill UniversitySallie BarkerSport and Recreation AllianceDr Misia JervisBrunel UniversityLinda PlowrightSports Leaders UKCeris AndersonStreetGamesChris RatcliffeEnglish Federation of Disability SportDr Vicci BoydLiverpool John Moores UniversitySally ProudloveChild Protection in Sport UnitDavid Turnersports coach UKDr Daniel RhindBrunel University/Research andColette EdenRugby Football Leagueevidence groupDr Melanie LangEdgehill UniversityMike Fishersports coach UKEdward ProcterSport Resolutions/Case managementAlex FultonNSPCCPaula TownsendDepartment for EducationSkills and knowledge groupBarry AustinDepartment for Culture MediaStuart WilsonSkills ActiveRachel TarrFootball AssociationAlison HoggEngland HockeyAlison SibcyBritish TriathlonMarc ScottBoccia EnglandDavid GentlesPro-Active South LondonBianca LongorioKentSportAmy FawcettSports Leaders UKJude ToaslandChild Protection in Sport UnitEllen FalknerYouth Sport Trustand SportFramework groupNick SlinnChild Protection in Sport UnitJude ToaslandChild Protection in Sport UnitColette EdenRugby Football LeagueDenise RichardsSport NottinghamshireHeidi SaxonBritish GymnasticsJenny DearmanAmateur Swimming AssociationMike HamiltonBritish OrienteeringBen HollandsSport Across Staffordshire andStoke-on-TrentFrances BogieEngland NetballDavid GentlesPro-Active South LondonSteve BoocockWiltshire and Swindon Sport/Framework groupSpecial acknowledgment for providingcase studies:Brunel UniversityEnergize Shropshire, Telford and WrekinSport ResolutionsSportscoach UK15
CPSU is a partnership between NSPCC, Sport England, Sport Wales and Sport Northern Ireland.Visit the CPSU website www.thecpsu.org.uk and follow us on Twitter @TheCPSUChild Protection in Sport Unit 2013 NSPCC. Rregistered charity numbers 216401 and SC037717.Photography by Action Images and Tom Hull, posed by models. Accurate at date of publication. October 2013.Job number: 2013729.
NGBs funded by Sport England have undertaken safeguarding self–assessments using new tools (available via the CPSU website). CPSU contracts are in place between Sport England, (participation focus), and UK Sport (elite level focus) to support N
MITSUBISHI METALWOOD CUSTOM SHAFTS OPTIONS mitsubishirayongolf.com Model Flex Weight Torque Tip Size Butt Size Launch Spin Tip Stiffness Fubuki J 60 X 66 3.9 0.335 0.600 Mid Mid Mid S 64 3.9 0.335 0.600 Mid Mid Mid R 61 3.9 0.335 0.600 Mid Mid Mid Fubuki J 70 X 74 3.6 0.335 0.600 Mid
Low Mid High Launch Spin Low Mid High Launch Spin KBS Hi-Rev 2.0 Wedge Flex R S X Tip.355" .355" .355" Weight (g) 115 125 135 Torque N/A N/A N/A Launch Mid Mid Mid Program Stock Stock Stock KBS TOUR 105 Flex R S X Tip.355" .355" .355" Weight (g) 105 110 115 Torque 2.5 2.5 2.5 Launch Mid-High Mid-High Mid-High Spin Mid-High M
North Monterey County Mid-Cycle Progress Report 7 NORTH MONTEREY COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL MID-CYCLE PROGRESS REPORT Student Enrollment and Demographic Data In the 2015-2016 school year, North Monterey County High School had a student body of 1,111 with an almost even split amongst males and females. The male student population was 52%
CDE Progress Report Rev. 10/19 THEODORE ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL ACS WASC/CDE MID-CYCLE PROGRESS VISIT SCHOOL PROGRESS REPORT 4250 E. Tulare Ave. Fresno, CA 93702 March 9-10, 2020 Accrediting Commissio
Bottom rail, mid & top railS Top Rail Mid-Rail Bottom Rail how to measure mid-rail height When measuring the mid-rail height it is important to measure to the center point of where you would like the mid-rail to be placed. As the mid-rail is the same size as an individual louver, it will be placed approximately /- 1” for the specified height.
(Jan 2012 Template) Project Completion Report Project Country/Region: Uganda Project Title: Testing Synergies in Distributed Renewable Village Power in Africa Date: 22ndDecember, 2015 Project Reference Number: AAGL-0047b Note to supplier: This progress report is intended to summarise the complete progress of the project. The report should be .
1. The Student Progress report is the legally required reporting document. The report must state that the student is receiving ELL support. 2. The Student Progress report must refer the parent to the enclosed report from the ELL teacher unless the ELL teacher’s comments are embedded in the Student Progress Report.
Kata Kunci : Asam folat, Anemia, Gagal Ginjal Kronik, Rawat Inap . ii ABSTRACT A STUDY OF FOLIC ACID USE IN ANEMIC CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED IN RSUD SIDOARJO Chronic renal failure is disturbance of kidney functions that progressive and irreversible where the ability of kidney to maintain the metabolism and liquid balance also electrolit causes uremic. Anemic is a complication .
