Downtown Montessori Academy, Inc. - Evident Change

2y ago
16 Views
2 Downloads
332.98 KB
69 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Rosa Marty
Transcription

Downtown MontessoriAcademy, Inc.Programmatic Profile and EducationalPerformance2010–11 School YearReport Date: August 2011Prepared by:Janice Ereth, Ph.D.Susan GramlingTheresa HealyChildren’s Research CenterA nonprofit social research organization and division of the National Council on Crime and Delinquency426 S. Yellowstone Drive, Suite 250Madison, WI 53719Voice (608) 831-1180 fax (608) 831-6446www.nccd-crc.org

TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY . iI.INTRODUCTION .1II.PROGRAMMATIC PROFILE.2A.Philosophy and Description of Educational Methodology .21.Montessori Approach .22.Teacher Information.43.Parental Involvement .64.Discipline Policy .75.Waiting List .8B.Student Population .8C.Hours of Instruction .11D.Computer/Technology Capability .11E.Activities for Continuous School Improvement .11F.Graduation and High School Guidance Information .13III.EDUCATIONAL PERFORMANCE .14A.Attendance .14B.Parent Conferences and Contracts .14C.Special Education Student Records .15D.Local Measures of Educational Performance .151.Progress Reports for Grades K3 Through K5 .162.Reading, Writing, and Math Progress for First Through Eighth Grades .18a.Reading Skills .18b.Writing Skills .19c.Math Skills .213.Special Education Student Progress.22E.Standardized Measures of Educational Performance .221.SDRT for First Grade.232.SDRT for Second Grade .253.SDRT for Third Grade .264.WKCE for Third Grade .275.WKCE for Fourth Grade .286.WKCE for Fifth and Sixth Grade .307.WKCE for Seventh and Eighth Grade .31F.Multiple-year Student Progress.321.First- Through Third-grade Students .322.Multiple-year Progress for Students Who Met Proficiency Expectations .333.Multiple-year Progress for Students Who Did Not MeetProficiency Expectations .35https://sharepoint.nccdcrc.org/Projects/Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)G.V.Annual Review of the School’s Adequate Yearly Progress .351.Background Information .352.Three-year Adequate Yearly Progress .36SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATIONS .37A.Contract Compliance .37B.Education-related Findings .37C.Local Measure Results .37D.Standardized Test Results .38E.Multiple-year Advancement .39F.Recommendations .39APPENDICESAppendix A: Contract Compliance ChartAppendix B: Outcome Measures Agreement MemoAppendix C: Trend InformationAppendix D: School roject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYforDowntown Montessori Academy, Inc.2010–11This is the 13th annual report on the operation of Downtown Montessori Academy, Inc., a Cityof Milwaukee charter school. It is a result of intensive work undertaken by the City ofMilwaukee Charter School Review Committee (CSRC), school staff, and the Children’sResearch Center (CRC). Based on the information gathered and discussed in the attached report,CRC has determined the following findings.I.CONTRACT COMPLIANCE SUMMARYDowntown Montessori has met all provisions of its contract with the City of Milwaukee and thesubsequent requirements of the CSRC. See Appendix A for a list of each education-relatedcontract provision and report page references.II.PERFORMANCE CRITERIAA.Local Measures1.Secondary Measures of Academic ProgressTo meet City of Milwaukee requirements, Downtown Montessori identified measurableeducation-related outcomes in the following areas: Attendance;Parent involvement; andSpecial education student records.The school achieved its goals in all of these outcomes.2.Primary Educational Measures of Academic ProgressThe CSRC requires that the school track student progress in reading, writing, and mathematicsthroughout the year to identify students in need of additional help and to assist teachers indeveloping strategies to improve the academic performance of all students.This year, Downtown Montessori’s local measures of academic progress resulted in thefollowing Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten student progress: By the end of the school year,K3 through K5 students showed progress or reached proficiency in 88.9% oflanguage, 87.6% of math skills, 91.0% of sensorial skills, 86.5% of cultural skills,and 94.1% of practical life skills. Reading skills:McGraw-Hill reading tests given at the end of the year indicate that 40(83.3%) of 48 students in first through third grades scored at least 70%correct.»McGraw-Hill reading tests from first to last marking period indicate that12 (57.1%) of 21 fourth through sixth graders were able to showimprovement.»Literacy results from the first to last marking period show that 6 (60.0%)of 10 seventh and eighth graders showed improvement. Writing skills for 79 students in first through eighth grade were assessed using theSix Traits of Writing rubric. Results indicate that 72 (91.1%) students showedimprovement. Math skills: B.»»There were 70 students in first through sixth grade who were tested inmath during the fourth quarter. Fourteen (20.0%) progressed frompracticed to proficient on all skills. On average, students reachedproficiency on 72.4% of skills.»The school’s seventh- and eighth-grade math goal applied to students whowere above grade level. All 9 of the seventh- and eighth-grade studentswere at or above average in math skills. Because there were fewer than 10students in the cohort, results could not be included in this report.Special education students: There were fewer than 10 special education studentsdue for an annual IEP review; therefore, results were not included in this report.Year-to-year Academic Achievement on Standardized TestsDowntown Montessori administered all required standardized tests noted in their contract withthe City of Milwaukee. Multiple-year student progress is described below.»Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test (SDRT) multiple-year advancement resultsindicated that 13 second graders advanced an average of 1.2 grade-levelequivalents (GLE) in reading and 13 third graders advanced an average of roject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

»All 29 (100.0%) students who were proficient in reading in 2009–10 maintainedproficiency as measured on the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examination(WKCE).»All 24 (100.0%) students who were proficient in math in 2009–10 maintainedproficiency as measured on the WKCE.Figure ES1Downtown Montessori AcademyWKCE ResultsStudents Who Maintained ProficiencyFrom 2009–10 to 2010–11Reading (N 29)100.0%Math (N 24)100.0%0.0%20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%There were three students who tested below grade level on the SDRT, and five students whowere minimal or basic in math based on the WKCE. Due to the small sizes of the cohort, resultscould not be included in this report.C.Adequate Yearly ProgressThe school reached adequate yearly progress (AYP) in all four of the AYP objectives: testparticipation, attendance, reading, and mathematics. For the third year in a row, the WisconsinDepartment of Public Instruction (DPI) reported that the school received a satisfactorydesignation in all four of these objectives.III.RECOMMENDATIONSThe school addressed all but one of the recommendations in its 2009–10 programmatic profileand educational performance report. To continue a focused school improvement plan, it isrecommended that the focus of activities for the 2011–12 year include the following steps: Develop a schoolwide policy for retaining a student in the same grade for ects/Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

Continue to develop the skills of the new and returning members of the Board ofDirectors. Develop a methodology to align the RtI (Response to Intervention) modelrequired by the State of Wisconsin with the Montessori approach, similar to theway special education is aligned with the Montessori /Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

I.INTRODUCTIONThis is the 13th annual program monitoring report to address educational outcomes atDowntown Montessori Academy, Inc., a City of Milwaukee charter school.1 This report wasprepared as a result of a contract between the City of Milwaukee Charter School ReviewCommittee (CSRC) and the Children’s Research Center (CRC).2 It is one component of themonitoring program undertaken by the CSRC.The process used to gather the information in this report included the following steps.1 CRC staff visited the school and conducted a structured interview in the fall withthe program director. Critical documents were reviewed and copies were obtainedfor CRC files. CRC staff assisted the school in developing its outcome measures for the annuallearning memo. Additional site visits occurred where classroom instruction was observed, withnotes recorded on student-teacher interactions. CRC staff read case files for selected special education students to ensure thatindividualized education programs (IEPs) were updated. CRC staff conducted an end-of-year structured interview with the programdirector. The school provided electronic data to CRC. CRC staff compiled and analyzed results.The City of Milwaukee Common Council chartered five schools in the 2010–11 academic year.2CRC is a division of the nonprofit National Council on Crime and Delinquency (NCCD). NCCD promotes just and equitablesocial systems for individuals, families, and communities through research, public policy, and Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

II.PROGRAMMATIC PROFILEDowntown Montessori Academy, Inc.2507 South Graham StreetMilwaukee, WI 53207Telephone: (414) 744-6005Program Director: Ms. Virginia FlynnA.Philosophy and Description of Educational Methodology1.Montessori ApproachDowntown Montessori Academy, Inc. (Downtown Montessori), delivers a validMontessori program as interpreted by the Association Montessori Internationale or the AmericanMontessori Society. Montessori education is both a philosophy of child growth and a rationalefor guiding such growth. It is based on a child’s developmental needs for freedom within limits,and a carefully prepared environment that guarantees exposure to materials and experiencesthrough which to develop intelligence as well as physical and psychological abilities. Begun inItaly by Dr. Maria Montessori, Montessori education was introduced into the United States in1912, with one of the early schools established by Alexander Graham Bell in his own home.Montessori education has enjoyed a resurgence of interest in recent years, reflecting growingrecognition of the validity of its approach.3Downtown Montessori is currently divided into four levels of programming. TheChildren’s House contains the Montessori primary program, open to students ages 3 through 6years, and includes grades K3, K4 and K5.4 The lower elementary program is designed forstudents in first through third grades; the upper elementary program is open to students in fourth3See the 2010–11 Parent-Student Handbook, which was provided to CRC in fall of 2010.4Children aged 5 on or before September 1 may attend full-day Montessori sessions. Children aged 4 on or before September 1may attend half- or full-day 4-year-old program. The full day for 4-year-olds consists of half-day Montessori and half-day /Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

through sixth grades; and the fourth level, the adolescent program, is for students in seventh andeighth grades.The Children’s House provides an environment prepared to meet the needs of children,where children work individually and collaboratively with sensorial materials that engage theircuriosity. Children are free to explore and observe at their own pace. The variety of sensorialexperiences enables children to refine and classify their impressions of the world around them.The classroom engages children with numbers and language, writing and reading, the tools forreasoning and communication, and the basis of self-directed learning.The sense of responsibility to self and to the community, introduced in the Children’sHouse, is further developed in the elementary level. At the lower elementary level, the schoolcontinues to provide multi-age grouping in an environment that encourages cooperative learningand self-discipline. This program is based on “Great Stories” and explores everything from themicroscopic to the cosmic, allowing children to discover how all things are inter-related.5 Theprogram builds on the foundations of the Children’s House program.The upper elementary program follows a three-year curriculum cycle in all areas of studyexcept mathematics. Learning ways of inquiring, investigating, and resolving questions plays adominant role in the upper elementary program. The elementary levels emphasize aninterdisciplinary approach to learning as well as respect for self and community. Materials andgroup activities are designed to develop individual and collaborative skills in the areas ofbiology, mathematics, language, history, geography, music, and the visual arts. The environmentreinforces children’s natural curiosity and community.5In the Montessori curriculum, the Great Stories are the five stories that span the curriculum at a glance. Key lessons are taughtas a result of the stories, emphasizing fundamental parts of each story that are found in all subject ject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

The adolescent program (seventh and eighth grades) reflects a more rigorous level ofacademic challenge and preparation for high school. Study skills, time management, and settinghigh work and social standards are all vital components of the adolescent program.Students experience extensions of classroom study through community involvement,which gradually enables students to grow from classroom citizens to citizens in society at large.In addition to being a state-certified “Green and Healthy School,” the school is a member of theUrban Ecology Center. The center, located on the Milwaukee River, provides a coordinatedscience and environmental program for students.2.Teacher InformationMontessori teachers serve as student guides, with the students working at their own pace.The areas of discovery are ordered into a sequentially progressive curriculum that iscommensurate with the development of the child.During the 2010–11 academic year there were eight classrooms. The classrooms includedthree Children’s House classrooms for 3- to 6-year-olds (or K3 through K5), three lowerelementary (first through third grades) classrooms, one upper elementary (fourth through sixthgrades) classroom, and one adolescent (seventh and eighth grades) classroom.The school employed a total of nine instructional staff, including seven classroomteachers.6 The Children’s House had three teachers, and one part-time and two full-timeassistants. The three lower elementary classrooms were staffed by two teachers with one fulltime and two part-time assistants. The upper elementary and adolescent classrooms were eachstaffed with a full-time teacher and a part-time assistant. The school employed an additional parttime assistant who supported all classrooms as needed and provided music instruction under the6Instructional staff include regular education teachers, specialists, special education teachers, and substitute teachers employedby the oject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

direction of the Montessori classroom teachers. Additional instructional staff included aspeech/language pathologist and a part-time reading teacher.7 One of the classroom teachers,who is certified as a special education teacher, shared her time between the Children’s House’smorning-only classroom and special education duties.The instructional staff retention rate is the percentage of teachers and other instructionalstaff who were employed at the school for the entire academic year. The school started the yearwith seven teachers and an additional two instructional staff members.8 No teachers orinstructional staff left the school’s employment during the school year, for a retention rate of100%.The staff return rate is the percentage of eligible staff employed at the end of the previousschool year who return to the school in the fall. Eligible staff are those who are offeredcontinuing positions for the following school year. All seven teachers and the two additionalinstructional staff were eligible to return and did so, for a return rate of 100%.Three of the classroom teachers have taught at the school since its original charter 13years ago. One teacher has been teaching at the school for 11 years, one teacher completed hersecond, another her third, and another her fourth year at the school. The average number of yearsof experience at Downtown Montessori for classroom teachers (including the special educationteacher) was 8.4. The average number of years of experience for instructional staff, other thanteachers and including the speech pathologist and the reading specialist, was 2.5. The averageteaching experience for all nine instructional staff was 7.1.All but one of the seven classroom teachers and the special education teacher hadMontessori certification. All nine instructional staff held a held a Department of PublicInstruction (DPI) license, as indicated on the DPI website.7The school contracted for the services of a psychologist and an occupational therapist as needed.8The person who shares teaching with special education duties is counted in the teacher oject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

Inservice meetings were held one Friday each month and included the following topics:3.1.Planning for individual learners; RtI planning and development.2.Two presentations from the school psychologist on understanding the referralprocess and the teacher’s role in the referral process.3.Literacy and the classroom teacher, presented by Sue Terry from Cardinal StritchUniversity. There were six sessions that lasted two hours each. Ms. Terry alsoobserved each teacher in the classroom, and then met with them to develop a planfor professional growth.Parental InvolvementAs described in the 2010–11 Parent-Student Handbook, Downtown Montessori seeks anddepends on the energy and the spirit of its parents. Parents are urged to contact their child’steacher for volunteer opportunities in and out of the classroom. Current research and priorexperience at Downtown Montessori show a direct relationship between the degree of parentalinvolvement in a school and the level of benefit that children receive through that school.Active involvement of parents includes activities such as accompanying children on fieldtrips, reading stories and sharing their experiences, assisting in building improvements such asbuilding shelves and assembling playground equipment, organizing publicity events, preparingsnacks, and donating equipment. The school expects all parents to spend at least four hours peryear on such service activities. The school posts activity sign-up sheets throughout the year, andsends emails as well as notes home with the students to encourage parents to participate inactivities. Parents are also encouraged to visit their child’s class at least once a year.Each child has a folder in which notices, school forms, and school work are sent homewith the child. Email is encouraged, as the school endeavors to communicate as much as possiblethrough email to prevent unnecessary paper use in accordance with the principles of a Green andHealthy School. Teacher email addresses are listed in the Parent-Student Handbook. The ject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

eavailable(http://www.downtownmontessori.com). The school also published and posted the annualParent-Student Handbook on its website. Parent-teacher conferences occur twice each year aswell as any time a parent wishes.4.Discipline PolicyThe school’s code of conduct and discipline policy was published in the 2010–11 Parent-Student Handbook. It indicated that when dealing with discipline, it is most important to create aconsistent environment for children. Adult reactions to the child are tested daily, and when theactions of a child demand correction, it is most important that all adults who are involved withthe child deal with the problem in the same way.The Montessori method encourages children to make choices and develop responsibilityfor their own actions. Discipline is used to help, not punish, the child. The method of correctivediscipline endorsed by Downtown Montessori has grown out of the Montessori approach. Whena child is involved in actions contrary to established rules, the goal is to redirect the child to otheractivities.All staff and parents serve as role models for the children, as demonstrated by theirconduct with the children, other staff, and other parents. Each child should be dealt withpositively; parents and staff should avoid showing anger. Quiet time is used only if redirection ofthe child does not work. The child will choose when he/she is ready to rejoin the group.When, in the judgment of the teacher and program director, a child’s behavior isdisruptive, disrespectful, cruel, or unsafe to the child or others, it cannot and will not betolerated. All interventions will be formulated based on the principles of respect for the child;knowledge and understanding of the developmental needs and characteristics of the child and as7https://sharepoint.nccdcrc.org/Projects/Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

the needs of the group; and an understanding that appropriate behavior must be taught andmodeled.The discipline policy goes on to describe specific consequences for older children whenother interventions have not worked. These steps range from a review of the school rules and awarning for a first offense to possible consequences for fourth offenses, such as in-schoolsuspension, isolation from the group, or temporary suspension from activities, depending on thenature of the offense. For chronic behavior problems that are suspected to be beyond the child’scontrol, a referral is made to support services for evaluation and help. Suspension and/orexpulsion of students are considered last resorts and are subject to board review.5.Waiting ListAt the start of the 2010–11 school year, school staff reported having a waiting list of 25to 30 students. For the 2011–12 school year, the program director reported that there wereapproximately 42 students on the waiting list, with the majority at the K5 through third-gradelevels and a few in the upper grades.B.Student PopulationDowntown Montessori started the school year with 139 children in K3 through eighthgrade.9 By the end of the year, 7 more children had enrolled and three had withdrawn, as theyhad moved away.10 One student withdrew from K4 and one from K5, and one student movedaway during the year but still graduated from eighth grade. One of the children who withdrewhad special education needs. There were 136 of 139 children who started and finished the schoolyear at Downtown Montessori. This represents a student retention rate of 97.8%.9As of September 17, 2010.10The school did not expel any Project Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

At the end of the year, there were 143 students enrolled. Seventy-nine (55.2%) students were White, 25 (17.5%) were African American,24 (16.8%) were Hispanic, 14 (9.8%) were Asian, and 1 (0.7%) was NativeAmerican. There were 69 (48.3%) girls and 74 (51.7%) boys. Thirteen (9.1%) students had special education needs. Six had speech/languageimpairments, 5 had specific learning disabilities, and 2 had other healthimpairments. Forty-three (30.1%) students were eligible for free or reduced lunch prices and100 (69.9%) were not eligible for free/reduced lunch oject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

Grade levels for students enrolled at the end of the school year are illustrated below. Thelargest class was K4, with 23 students, and the smallest was seventh grade, with 3 students.Figure 1Downtown Montessori AcademyStudent Grade Levels*2010–11K423 (16.1%)K522 (15.4%)K318 (12.6%)8th7 (4.9%)1st19 (13.3%)7th3 (2.1%)6th5 (3.5%)2nd15 (10.5%)4th11 (7.7%)3rd15 (10.5%)5th5 (3.5%)N 143*At the end of the school year.There were 123 students attending Downtown Montessori on the last day of the 2009–10academic year who were eligible for continued enrollment at the school this past academic year(i.e., they did not graduate). Of these, 105 were enrolled in the school on the third Friday inSeptember 2010. This represents a return rate of 85.4% and compares to a return rate of 90.4% inthe fall of ject Documents/Downtown Year 13 2010-11 FINAL.docx 2011 by NCCD, All Rights Reserved

C.Hours of InstructionThe 2010–11 school year consisted of 160 school days. The hours of instruction for K3and K4 students were 8:45 a.m. to 11:45 a.m. each day. For students in K5 through eighthgrades, the school day was 8:45 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. The highest possible number of hours ofinstruction per day was 3 hours for K3 and K4 students and 6.5 hours for K5 through eighthgrade students; therefore, the provision of at least 875 hours of instruction for full-day students(K5 through eighth grade) was met. K3 and K4 students attended half-days; therefore, theprovision of 437.5 (one half of 875) hours of instruction was met.D.Computer/Technology CapabilityDowntown Montessori has generic personal computers (IBM-compatible). All studentshave access to computer stations at various times th

Downtown Montessori Academy, Inc. (Downtown Montessori), delivers a valid Montessori program as interpreted by the Association Montessori Internationale or the American Montessori Society. Montessori education is both a philosophy of child growth and a rationale for guiding such growth. It

Related Documents:

Montessori School in Cleveland, Ohio, and two that are no longer in operation: the Montessori Farm School in Half Moon Bay, California and the Erdkinder School near Atlanta, Georgia. In 1982, the Barrie School became the first Montessori Junior and Senior High School program officially recognized by the Ameri-can Montessori Society. That year,

philosophy, terms and conditions set forth in this handbook apply to all members of The Garden community. Montessori Philosophy The Montessori Method of education was developed by Dr. Maria Montessori, Italy's first female physician. She opened her first "school" (Casa dei Bambini) in 1907. Today, Montessori schools flourish all over the world.

2019-20 Membership Year Winter 2020 Dear Montessori friends! This year we celebrate Dr. Montessori's 150th birthday, born August 31, 1870. Time- traveling back to that year, we would find ourselves in a world that was just barely . Montessori Center of Downriver Maple Tree Montessori (734) 282-6465 (586) 212-6577 mary.lamos@gmail.com .

DEEP DIVE INTO MONTESSORI You prefer a PERSONAL TOUCH You need to WORK WHILE YOU TRAIN You want a training center with experience in PUBLIC MONTESSORI Choose your training: MONTESSORI CORE PRINCIPLES ORIENTATION COURSES: 0-3 3-6 6-12 DIPLOMA COURSES: 0-3 3-6 6-12 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT www.montessori-mint.org 214.503.6802

Montessori School also provides Special Education and student health services. The Children's House preschool program is a five day per week program (7:45 a.m. to 2:10 p.m.). The Montessori curriculum, using Montessori methods and materials, is presented to children in mixed-age environments by Montessori trained staff.

PMC's Montessori Materials 21 Montessori Home-schooling Bundle Offer 20 2 Career and Business Opportunities 22 Upper Elementary / Primary (9 - 12) Diploma 13 Montessori Schooling Solutions 17 PMCKIDS School Franchise 18. Maria Montessori was Italy's first lady doctor. She, a medical doctor by

The Montessori Method by Maria Montessori (1870-1952). Translated by Anne Everett George (1882-). New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1912. [Frontispiece] DR. MONTESSORI GIVING A LESSON IN TOUCHING GEOMETRICAL INSETS [Title Page] THE MONTESSORI METHOD SCIENTIFIC PEDAGOGY AS APPLIED TO CHILD EDUCATION IN "THE CHILDREN'S HOUSES" WITH ADDITIONS .

Astrology: The alignment of the planets and stars was very important, looking at when the patient was born and fell ill to decide what was wrong with them! This became more popular after the Black Death (1348) Astrology is a SUPERNATURAL explanation for disease. Apothecaries mixed ingredients to make ointments and medicines for the physicians. They learned from other apothecaries. They also .