LATION IN RESPONSE TO EPA INSPECTION OF MAY 14&15,

2y ago
20 Views
2 Downloads
272.73 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Helen France
Transcription

! I\:ATIONAL LABORATORY! Js Alamos Natzonai Lwbor.1:orvLJs Alamos .\lew .\-lexzco .;;-:;.;,:;Date:In Replv Refer To:\!at! Stop:Tdephone:July 31. 1998ESH-l8/WQ&H:98-0255K497(505) 665-1859 tr. Taylor . Sharpe6EN-WTCSEPA REGION 6Fountain Place1- 45 Ross AvenueDallas. TX 75202-2733SUBJECT:INFORJ\lATION IN RESPONSE TO EPA INSPECTION OF MAY 14&15,1998 AND MEETING WITH EPA OF JULY 1,1998Dear Mr. Sharpe:On July l. 1998. representatives from the Los Alamos National Laboratory presented an overviewof the Laboratory's Storm Water Program to Mr. Taylor Sharpe. Mr. Brent Larsen, and r. SyedShahriyar of EPA Region VI. This presentation was to provide additional information about theLaboratory's Storm Water Program and to provide an update to Mr. Sharpe on the corrective actionstaken from his compliance inspection on May 14 and 15. 1998. Other items discussed include:storm water discharges from Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) and the need for SWPPPlans for these discharges: future permitting under the Modified Multi-Sector Permit: and, the useof a watershed momtonng approach to meet the new monitoring requirements under Multi-SectorGeneral Permit. Commnments made during this meeting by the Laboratory included an update byJuly 31. 1998. as to the status of corrective actions taken from the inspection.In response to the EPA findings presented at the inspection close-out meetings on May 14 and 15.1998. the Laboratory has completed the following corrective actions:1. For the Material Disposal Area (MDA) Gat Technical Area (TA) 54, the maimenance ofBMPs has been completed. The amendments to the SWPP Plan including, SignatoryAuthority Delegation, names of SWPP Plan Team Members, spill response and reportingprocedures. and monitoring data have been completed. For the other observations noted byMr. Ralph Ford-Schmid DOE/OB. on March 18. 1998, all of the items addressing BMPmaintenance have been completed. For the three recommendations that address new BMPinstallations. designs have been completed and installation is scheduled to be completed byAugust 31, 1998 .lllllllllllllmlllllllllllllllllll15717

:IJuly 31. llJlJX.\lr. SharpeESH-WQ&H:98-0 255,For the SWMC 21-0 II t k l. 300 sandbags and about I00 straw bales were installed at the site.An entire new row of sandbags was added to the upstream face and top of the existingsandbag berm. All of the decaying straw bales above the site were removed. These strawbales were not replaced since the sandbag berm is diverting all run-on around the site. Atthe bottom of the Site. an additional row of straw bales was placed on the upstream side ofeach section of B lP.3.For the TA-39 Firing Sites 56 and 88. firing site operators are being trained on the latestrevision to the SWPP Plan. This training includes an overview of the SWPP Plan. BMPsand the inspection and maintenance of these BMPs. The shot debris observed at Firing Site88 has been cleaned-up.- .Please note that the Laboratory has completed a strategy to provide coverage of all SolidWaste Management Cnits (SWMUs) under Storm Water Pollution Prevention (SWPP)Plan(s) including those SWMUs with no visible point source or conveyance channel. Pleasesee the attached Draft SWPP Plan Development Strategy which was prepared as a result ofour discussions on July l. 1998. As discussed in the meeting, the strategy includes SWMUswith no point source or conveyance channel, even though the Laboratory does not agree withEPA's legal position regarding these SWMUs.If there you have any questions or if any additional information would be useful, please contactMike Alexander of the Laboratory's Water Quality and Hydrology Group at (505) 665-47-52.In addition. I would like to thank you. Mr. Larsen, and Mr. Shahriyar for the opportunity to meetand discuss the Laboratory· s Storm Water Program.Sincerely, .,.?;'Steven RaeGroup LeaderWater Quality and Hydrology GroupSR:MNrjCy:B. Larsen. 6WQ-PP. USEPA REGION 6, Dallas, TexasS. Shahriyar. 6WQ-PP. USEPA Region 6. Dallas. TexasR. Powell, NMED. Santa Fe, New MexicoB. Koch. DOEILA.-\0. MS A316T. Stanford. EM\SWO. MS J595R. Day. DX-DO . .\IS P915D. Erickson. ESH-00 . .\IS K49lL. McAtee. ESH-00 . .\lS K491

i I·· ··-;· ·,, !:" ESH-18/\VQ&H:9 8-025Cv: rcont'dlT. George. ER Project. IS \1992D. Mcinroy, ER Project. tS 1992S. Mee. EM\SWO. 1S 1595S. French. EM\ESO-ESH-19. tS 1595B. Wechsler. EM\SWO. MS 15931. Vasilik. DX. IS P944F. Sisneros. DX-FM\ESH-7. \IS P9I5M. Alexander. ESH-18. MS K-1-97R. Reynolds, ESH-18. MS K-1-97S. Veenis, ESH-18. MS K497WQ&H File. MS K497CIC-10. MS AI50J U I Y, I ,I 7 7 0

Los Alamos National LaboratorySWMU Coverage under the NPDES Storm Water ProgramSWPP Plan Development StrategyThe Los Alamos National Laboratory will develop SWPP Plan covering SWMUs. This SWPP Planwill follow the guidance found in the NPDES Baseline General and Multi-Sector General Perm1ts.The following describes the Laboratory's strategy for developing these Plan(s). Only SWMUs that meet the definition of industrial activity will be included in these SWPPPlan(s).Currently there are 1082 SWMUs in Module VIII of the Laboratory's ACRA OperatingPermit. These SWMUs will be reviewed and a determination made as to the potential of these sitescontributing potential pollutants to storm water runoff. Aggregation of these SWMUs will fallinto the following categories.SWMUs that have been proposed for NFA, these sites will be sorted by criteria.SWMUs that are not exposed to storm water or storm water runoff, these sites includesites that are located within buildings or are subsurface units.SWMUs that have been remediated. The remaining inactive SWMUs will be separated into those units that are active or inactive.Active SWMUs will be covered operational SWPP Plans. The remaining SWMUs will be separated into different groups that are sorted by drainageareas and facility ownership. For each of the these groups, SWMUs that do not demonstrate a distinct point sourcedis,.- :rge, or other forms of storm water runoff. ana are located on flat terrain, the SWPP PlanWi:Jude genenc BMPs, such as;Maintenance of existing vegetation.Review of all proposed and on-going activities in the area to ensure the site is notdisturbed.Inspection on Generic BMPs.Other Administrative Controls. For each of these groups of SWMUs the SWPP Plan(s) will include BMPS and inspection andmaintenance criteria as specified in the General Permits.The Surface Water Assessment Team (SWAT) recommendations from Site SpecificSurface Water Assessment Process (AP 4.5), will be used to determine appropriateBMPs. These recommendations will be incorporated into the Plan.

EP,I\ Region 6 -Water Enforcement Branch -. rmw ·-Hot Topics- Multi-Sector PermitYear ofPermitStart /www .epa.gov/earth 1r6/6en/w/sw/hottopms. htmThrough ptember(prepare & begin implementing SWPPP)(2nd year monitoring)continue implementing SWPPP(4th year monitoring)(permit expires)19961997199819992000Multi-Sector Permit EligibilityMost facilities that meet the definition of "storm water associated with industrial activity" in40 C.F.R. 122.26(b)(14) are eligible for the Multi-Sector permit. However, not all sectorsof industrial activities applied for group coverage and there are a few industries required tohave storm water permit coverage that are not eligible for the Multi-Sector permit.Currently, the only available general permit for these industrial activities is the BaselineIndustrial storm water permit. The following is a list that includes most facilities that arerequired to have a storm water permit but are not eligible for the Multi-Sector permitaccording to their SIC codes: 2833, 2834, 2835, 2836, 2911, 3131, 3142, 3143, 3144,3149,3151,3161,3171,31 72,3199,3274,3281,3291 ,3292,3296,3299. AJsoincludedare "open dumps" which are defined as solid waste disposal units that are not in compliancewith State and Federal criteria established under RCRA Subtitle D. Caution: this may not bean all inclusive list. Please review individual sectors in Part XI of the Multi-Sector permit todetermine any additional limitations on eligibility. Please review above the proposedmodifications to the Multi-Sector permit addressing these industries.Solid Waste Management Unit (SWMU):Any discernible waste management unit from which hazardous constituents may migrate,irrespective of whether the unit was intended for management of solid or hazardous wastes.The types of units considered SWMUs are landfills, surface impoundments, waste piles, landtreatment units, incinerators, injection wells, tanks, container storage areas. waste watertreatement system, and transfer stations. In addition, areas associated with production processesat facilities that have become contaminted as a result of routine, systematic, and deliberatereleases of wastes (which may include abandoned or discarded product), or hazardousconstituents from wastes, are considered SWMUs.SWMUs usually meet the definition of industrial activity in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(iv-v),thereby requiring an NPDES storm water permit. A SWMU might not be an industrialactivity if it contains no waste materials received from other industrial activities defined in40 CFR 122.26(b)(14), and the SWMU is not subject to Subtitle CorD of the ResourceConservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Additionally, SWMUs that only containradioactive wastes regulated under the Atomic Energy Act (42 USC 201 et seq.), and noother pollutants, may be exempt because the definition of "pollutant" (40 CFR 122.2)excludes certain radioactive wastes. SWMUs that contain radioactive wastes are regulatedby the Department ofEnergy.Radioactive waste SWMUs frequently contain other pollutants from industrial activities,thereby subjecting them to the NPDES permitting program. Such facilities are regulatedboth by EPA and the Department ofEnergy.3 of49111198 10:08 AM

sandbag berm. All of the decaying straw bales above the site were removed. These straw bales were not replaced since the sandbag berm is diverting all run-on around the site. At the bottom of Site. an additional row of straw bales wa

Related Documents:

Rapid Flow, Titration, Turbidimetry, Ultraviolet- Visible Spectroscopy (UV/VIS) Parameter/Analyte Water pH EPA 150.1 Turbidity EPA 180.1 Calcium EPA 200.7 Iron EPA 200.7 Magnesium EPA 200.7 Potassium EPA 200.7 Silica, Total EPA 200.7 Sodium EPA 200.7 Aluminum EPA 200.8 Antimony EPA 200.8 Arsenic EPA 200.8 .

EPA Test Method 1: EPA Test Method 2 EPA Test Method 3A. EPA Test Method 4 . Method 3A Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide . EPA Test Method 3A. Method 6C SO. 2. EPA Test Method 6C . Method 7E NOx . EPA Test Method 7E. Method 10 CO . EPA Test Method 10 . Method 25A Hydrocarbons (THC) EPA Test Method 25A. Method 30B Mercury (sorbent trap) EPA Test Method .

vii References The following resources were used in producing this manual: EPA: Package Treatment Plants MO-12, EPA 430/9-77-005, April 1977 EPA: Summary Report: The Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking and Foaming, EPA 625/8-87/012, July 1987 EPA: Manual: Nitrogen Control, EPA 625/R-93/010, September 1993 EPA: Handbook: Retrofitting POTWs, EPA 625/6-89/020, July 1989

EPA Method 7E –NO, NO 2, NOx Yes EPA Method 8 –SO 2, SO 3 Yes EPA Method 10 –CO Yes EPA Method 11 –H 2 S ( 50 ppm Yes EPA Method 16 –TRS Yes, including mercaptans and other reduced sulphurs EPA Method 18 –VOC’s Yes EPA Method 26 –HCl, HF Yes EPA CTM 027 –NH 3 Yes. ADVANTAGES OF FTIR

40 CFR Part 63 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0314, EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0312, EPA-HQ-OAR-2019-0313, EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0670, EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0668, EPA-HQ-OAR-2017-0669; FRL-10006-70-OAR] RIN 2060-AT49 and RIN 2060-AT72 NESHAP: Surface Coating

the following methods: . (Standard Methods, 2540D), 27 metals by ICP-AES (EPA, 200.7), mercury by FIMS (EPA, 245.2),, and 18 metals by ICP-MS (EPA, 200.8) 42 volatile organic compounds by GC-MS (EPA, 8260B), 28 metals by ICP-AES (EPA, 6010C), mercury by FIMS (EPA, 7470A and 7471B), and 18 metals by ICP-MS (EPA, 6020A)

This quality assurance project plan (QAPP) is consistent with EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA QA/R5, 2001, EPA/240/B-01/003); EPA Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Modeling (EPA QA/G-5M, 2002, EPA/240/R-02/007) and EPA

work/products (Beading, Candles, Carving, Food Products, Soap, Weaving, etc.) ⃝I understand that if my work contains Indigenous visual representation that it is a reflection of the Indigenous culture of my native region. ⃝To the best of my knowledge, my work/products fall within Craft Council standards and expectations with respect to