Stages Of Group Development - ACT On Alz

3y ago
39 Views
2 Downloads
329.91 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ronan Orellana
Transcription

Stages of Group DevelopmentShared by Mary Ann G. Hennen, Extension Center for Community Vitality, henne011@umn.edu, 10-21-14Most groups have predictable development, a finding based on four decades of study ofgroup development.Bruce Tuckman has developed one of the most well-referenced models in which thereare five consistent stages of group development: forming, storming, norming,performing, and adjourning. Most groups progress through these stages. Each stagebuilds on the previous stage and prepares the group for performing.Even with a compelling model, remember a few cautions: Some recent studies suggest that groups manifest behaviors from several stages atonce. Groups may return to earlier stages when some event takes place that disturbs theequilibrium of the group (e.g., new group members, changing of the group’s goals orprocedures). Many groups get stuck in one stage. Research in Fortune 500 companies shows, forexample, that only 29 percent of teams reach the performing stage. Reaching the performing stage requires constant attention to maintenance (internalgroup processes) as well as task (the content or production) functions.Tuckman Stages of Group Development OverviewStage 1 – FORMING: Forming the group; setting ground rules; finding similarities.Stage 2 – STORMING: Dealing with issues of power and control; surfacingdifferences.Stage 3 – NORMING: Managing group conflict; finding group norms; resurfacingsimilarities.Stage 4 – PERFORMING: Functioning as an effective group.Stage 5 – ADJOURNING: Finding closure.When members of a group first meet, typical questions they might have are: Why am I here?Who are all of these other people?What are we supposed to accomplish?What’s expected of me?What kinds of behavior are appropriate?1

Stage 1 – FORMINGTypical Behaviors:- The polite stage; focus on gettingacquainted and feeling comfortable.- Conflict is low, suppressed; need forapproval high.- Verbal members tend to dominate.- Ability to accomplish group tasks andstay focused is low.- Little listening; high distortion of whatis heard.- Watchful; guarded; personal feelingskept hidden.- Much giving of/asking for informationand data.- Some inclusion/exclusion issues with“new” and “old” group members.Implications for team leaders andfacilitators: Use climate-setting activities to breakthe ice. Help group members identify andprioritize their goals. Use brainstorming processes tosurface hopes, fears, andexpectations of members. Identify group-directed proceduresand establish ground rules. Have everyone identify the rolesneeded and begin defining roles andresponsibilities. Help the groups set norms forcommunicating, resolving conflicts,and presenting ideas. Have the group reflect on whatworked well in the group and whatdidn’t.Stage 2 - STORMINGTypical Behaviors:– Subgroups and individuals attempt toinfluence ideas, values, and opinions.– Competition for attention, recognition,and influence.– People confront each other;interpersonal conflict.– Polarization; lack of shared vision.– Members may opt out and/orcliques/alliances form.– Unsolicited comments; opinions.– Sense of feeling struck; frustrated.– Emotional reaction to task ormisperceptions about task.– Process issues discussed outside ofmeeting.– Quick fix: address symptoms, skirtproblems.– Power inequities, struggle asmembers “jockey for position.”Implications for team leaders andfacilitators: Try to surface underlying issues andlegitimate concerns; encourage theexpression of thoughts and feelings. Use collaborative interventions (e.g.,brainstorming, consensus building)and work on defining roles to supportcollaborative teamwork. Form subtask/problem teams that cutacross subgroup boundaries. Focus on major issues with the entiregroup. Model reflective listening and coachmembers on the skills. Reinforce respectful listening andcommunications during groupdiscussion. Expect conflict. Encourage groupmembers to express their frustrationsand anxieties, and then focus ondefining and organizing tasks.2

Stage 3 – NORMINGTypical Behaviors:- Authority/leadership issues discussedand resolved.- Issues, not people, confronted.- Cohesion among group membersbegins; subgroups disappear.- Members actively listen to each other.- Appreciation and acceptance ofalternative points of view.- Risky issues/process issues broughtup in meetings.- Ability to remain focused on task athand.- Quiet people now contributing more inthe group.- Values and assumptions begin to getdiscovered and discussed.- Relevant questions are asked.- Air of complacency may develop.- Individuals move beyond blame toresponsibility.Implications for team leaders andfacilitators: Identify the “hidden” norms and invitethe group to evaluate them or set newnorms. Assist the group to develop a positivegroup identity via teambuildingactivities. Challenge the boundaries of thegroup: bring in outsiders and /ornewcomers periodically. Redefine or reestablish goals byfocusing on desired results. Coach the group to use problemsolving methods wisely (e.g., nominalgroup, data dump). Use consensus-building interventionsand explore areas of actual difference. Encourage open communication whenmembers “close up” and appearreluctant to share. Invite input when people are reluctantto address issues that might result inconflict.Stage 4 – PERFORMINGTypical Behaviors:- Members try new behaviors andaccept new ideas.- Members relate with honesty, respect,authenticity.- Problems and difficult issues are dealtwith, handled creatively.- Diversity is affirmed and welcomed.- Member resourcefulness is utilized toenergize each other.- Decision-making process to be usedis understood.- Frequent review of process issues.- Clarity on how members experienceeach other.- Outside help/resources welcomed.- Differences bridged with integrity.- Commitment to work toward commongoals.Implications for team leaders andfacilitators: Use problem-solving and consensusbuilding processes to facilitate groupwork. Do nothing, join in and comment onwhat’s going well. Experiment with group structures andexplore process improvements. Help the group critique itself. Yourrole as leader becomes less active. Arrange appropriateceremonies/rituals for celebration ofaccomplishments. Use or suggest inclusion activities thatgive new members a sense ofacceptance.3

Stage 5 – ADJOURNINGTypical Behaviors:- The sense of the group is that thework is done.- May be apprehension over theimpending loss of group identity andfriendships.- Cleaning up the group’s undone tasksand removing symbols of the group.- Evaluating the results and producingfinal reports.- Saying goodbye.Implications for team leaders andfacilitators: Establish closing procedures with thegroup. Help design closing ritual orceremonies. Discuss endings with members andencourage them to talk about howthey feel. Provide a vehicle for people to saywhat they appreciate about each other. End with a celebration that honors thegroup and its members.Adapted by Lisa Hinz, LCE Extension Educator from: Facilitation Resources: Volume 4. Managing Group Interactions, (1999)University of Minnesota Extension Service and Hubert H Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota. pp. 4.214.24. Referenced Source: Terry R. Bacon, High Impact Facilitation, International Learning Works, Durango, CO, 1996, originallyfrom: Tuckman, Bruce. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological bulletin, 63, 384-399 Tuckman, B. W. &Jensen, M. A. (1977) Stages of small-group development revisited. Group Org. Studies 2:419-27. 2014 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. University of Minnesota Extension is an equal opportunity educatorand employer. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this material is available in alternative formats upon request. Directrequests to 612-624-1222. Printed on recycled and recyclable paper with at least 10 percent postconsumer waste material.4

.

building processes to facilitate group work. Do nothing, join in and comment on what’s going well. Experiment with group structures and explore process improvements. Help the group critique itself. Your role as leader becomes less active. Arrange appropriate ceremonies/rituals for celebration of accomplishments. Use or suggest inclusion activities that give new members a sense of acceptance .

Related Documents:

6 of 2001, Act No. 7 of 2002, Act No. 15 of 2003, Act No. 4 of 2004, Act No. 6 of 2005, Act No. 10 of 2006, Act No. 9 of 2007, Act No. 8 of 2008, Act No. 8 of 2009, Act No. 10 of 2010, Act No. 4 of 2012.] PART I - PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement This Act may be cited as the Income Tax Act, 1973 and shall, subject to the

Act I, Scene 1 Act I, Scene 2 Act I, Scene 3 Act II, Scene 1 Act II, Scene 2 Act II, Scene 3 Act III, Scene 1 20. Act I, Scene 1–Act III, Scene 1: Summary . Directions: Summarize what you what you have read so far in Divided Loyalties (Act I-Act III, Scene1). 21. Act III, Scenes 2 and 3:

LAW BOOK Act 358 of 1955 As Amended By Act 490 of 1961 Act 403 of 1965 Act 400 of 1969 Act 566 of 1973 Acts 532 & 644 of 1975 Act 465 of 1987 Act 1228 of 1991 Act 1056 of 1993 Act 771 of 1995 Act 512 of 1997 Acts 595,596 & 680 of 2003 Act 207 of 2005 Act 223 of 2007 Issued by ARKANSAS STAT

Stages of Group Development (Tuckman, 1965) Bruce Tuckman (1965) originally described four stages of group development that describe both interpersonal relationships and task activities. These stages in order of development are: Forming: The group comes together for the first time or re-forms in a new way.

EVIDENCE ACT [Date of assent: 9th December, 1963.] [Date of commencement: 10th December, 1963.] An Act of Parliament to declare the law of evidence [Act No. 46 of 1963, L.N. 22/1965, Act No. 17 of 1967, Act No. 8 of 1968, Act No. 10 of 1969, Act No. 13 of 1972, Act No. 14 of 1972, Act No. 19 of 1985, Act

4.3 STAGES OF SOCIAL WORK GROUP FORMATION There are a number of stages or phases in formation of a social work group. Ken Heap (1985) discussed these as group formation and planning; the first meetings; the working phase; use of activities and action; and the termination of the Group. According to Douglas (1979) there are five stages viz., conceptualisation, creation, operation, termination .

William Shakespeare (1564–1616). The Oxford Shakespeare. 1914. The Tempest Table of Contents: Act I Scene 1 Act I Scene 2 Act II Scene 1 Act II Scene 2 Act III Scene 1 Act III Scene 2 Act III Scene 3 Act IV Scene 1 Act V Scene 1 Act I. Scene I. On a Ship at

Tax Act, the Individual Consumption Tax Act, the Liquor Tax Act, the Education Tax Act, the Traffic, Energy and Environment Tax Act, and the Act on Special Rural Development Tax are in conflict with this Act with respect to the imposition, collection, refund, write-off, etc. of a value-added tax, local consumption tax,