Cruise Shipping And Urban Development

2y ago
30 Views
2 Downloads
3.00 MB
46 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Macey Ridenour
Transcription

CPBCorporate PartnershipBoardCruise Shipping andUrban DevelopmentThe Case of PiraeusCase-Specific Policy Analysis

Cruise Shipping andUrban DevelopmentThe Case of PiraeusCase-Specific Policy Analysis

The International Transport ForumThe International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 59 member countries.It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF isthe only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous andadministratively integrated with the OECD.The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeperunderstanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and socialinclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy.The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and prenegotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promoteexchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’slargest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy.The Members of the ITF are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus,Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia,Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia,Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Korea, Latvia,Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, theNetherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, SlovakRepublic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Arab Emirates, the UnitedKingdom and the United States.International Transport Forum2, rue André PascalF-75775 Paris Cedex c Policy Analysis ReportsThe ITF’s Case-Specific Policy Analysis series presents topical studies on specific issues carried outby the ITF in agreement with local institutions. This work is published under the responsibility of theSecretary-General of the ITF. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarilyreflect the official views of ITF or OECD member countries.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS – 3AcknowledgementsThis report forms part of an ITF project on Cruise Shipping and Urban Development, directed byOlaf Merk. It was written by Olaf Merk and Bénédicte Busquet. The report was made possible through avoluntary contribution by the Piraeus Port Authority. Valuable comments on a draft version of the reportwere provided by Nektarios Demenopoulos of the Piraeus Port Authority, Maria Poulou of PiraeusMunicipality, and Stephen Perkins and Liv Gudmundson of the ITF. Stefano Bonaldo, from theResearch and Development Unit of the Venice Port Authority, acted as Peer Reviewer during a studyvisit to Piraeus.During this study visit, interviews were conducted with the following stakeholders: StavrosHatzakos (Piraeus Port Authority), Dimitris Agripidis (Piraeus Port Authority), Theodoros Tsitouras(Piraeus Port Authority), Anastasia Frantzeskaki (Piraeus Port Authority) Nektarios Demenopoulos(Piraeus Port Authority), Petros Kokkalis (Piraeus Municipality), Maria Poulou (Piraeus Municipality),Natassa Kannavou (Piraeus Municipality), George Gavrilis (Region of Attica), Kostas Vassiliadis(Region of Attica), Stavros Malagoniaris (Region of Attica), John Stefanou (Region of Attica), VassilisKorkidis (Piraeus Chamber of Commerce and Industry), Tassos Vamvakidis (Piraeus ContainerTerminal S.A.), Christina Baboulaki (Piraeus Container Terminal S.A.), Thanos Pallis (MedCruise) andChristos Makriales (Inchcape Shipping Services).CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS – 5Table of contentsExecutive summary . 6Piraeus as a cruise port . 9The leading cruise port in the East Mediterranean . 9Competitiveness of Piraeus as a cruise port . 14Impact of cruise shipping on the port and the city . 19Economic impacts: Benefits for the region, but limited spillover to Piraeus. 19Environmental impact: Important air emissions and congestion . 22Policies to make cruise shipping a driver of local development . 25Develop a strategy to attract tourists in Piraeus . 25Facilitate stakeholder co-operation to boost a port-city cruise strategy . 27Engage in lowering the environmental impacts of cruising on the city . 34References . 37Annex 1. National maritime “clusters” in Europe. 41Notes . 44CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

6 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARYExecutive summaryWhat we didThis study assesses the impacts of cruise shipping on urban development in Piraeus, Greece. Itreviews current economic and environmental policies relating to cruise activities and providesrecommendations on how Piraeus could better seize opportunities for local development from cruiseshipping. The study was carried out as part of a programme on Cruise Shipping and Urban Developmentat the International Transport Forum (ITF) at the OECD and benefits from a study visit to Piraeus as wellas a series of interviews conducted with relevant stakeholders.What we foundWith around one million cruise passengers in 2015, Piraeus is Greece’s largest cruise port and oneof the largest cruise ports in the Mediterranean. More than two-thirds of the passengers are transitpassengers, staying on average less than half a day in the region. Although the number of cruisepassengers has doubled since 2001, the growth rate in Piraeus lags behind the average in Mediterraneancruise ports which saw their passenger numbers triple over the same period. Yet the port has extensivededicated infrastructure for cruise shipping and offers a wide range of services. The presence of anumber of important tourist attractions within easy reach is also making it an attractive destination fortourist excursions.Despite its success in attracting cruise passengers and significant benefits for Greece and Athens,the local economic benefits from cruise remain low for Piraeus: They are estimated at a fifth of the totaleconomic impact. Because the port mainly attracts transit calls, cruise tourists only have a few hours inthe city, which means their spending is limited. They also tend to skip Piraeus in favour of Athens wherethe major tourist attractions are located. This is due to a lack of awareness of the tourist offerings inPiraeus and the absence of a tourism strategy.There are various negative impacts from cruise shipping for local residents, most importantly airemissions and traffic congestion. As a large passenger port, Piraeus generates significant air pollution.Cruise ships also contribute to the often heavy congestion on Piraeus’s main road, especially during thepeak of the cruise season where up to ten ships can be simultaneously berthed at the port.What we recommendDevelop a strategy to attract tourists to the city of PiraeusThe municipality of Piraeus has recently initiated a commendable city branding initiative under thelabel “Destination Piraeus”. This could form the basis for an expanded strategy to attract cruise touriststo Piraeus. Other initiatives could be launched to encourage cruise passengers to visit the city, e.g. viaevents and cultural activities targeting cruise passengers. Piraeus would achieve larger local economicbenefits through adapting to the needs of potential spenders, both cruise passengers and crews. Thiswould imply greater flexibility in shop opening hours, enhancing of the port's surroundings to make themmore welcoming, and providing a more targeted offer of shops, food and beverages around the port. In aCRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 72014 report, the OECD already recommended liberalising Sunday shop openings and abolishingrestrictions on hotels, which constitute a barrier to entry for newcomers, harm competition andpotentially lead to higher costs for tourists. The municipality’s plan to make Piraeus morepedestrian-friendly could also help to increase its attractiveness for cruise passengers.Facilitate stakeholder co-operation to boost competitiveness of Piraeus as a cruise destinationWith the privatisation of the port authority completed, effective strategies for the future of cruiseshipping in Piraeus can now be put in place. The new status of the port authority can make it easier toexpand services to cruise lines and cruise passengers. Greater collaboration with local authorities andother local cruise stakeholders should lead to a more integrated offer and co-ordinated solutions. Astakeholder platform or cluster could be built on the Piraeus Municipality’s efforts to develop a BlueGrowth strategy, and on plans for an incubator that could stimulate maritime entrepreneurship and jobcreation in Piraeus. The economic benefits of cruise shipping for Piraeus could be further enhanced byimproving the efficiency of logistics, e.g. via the development of logistics areas in the Attica region, andcollaborating with Athens airport, e.g. to provide plane-to-ship baggage handling.Work to reduce the environmental impacts of cruise shipping on PiraeusThe Piraeus Port Authority should systematically assess the environmental impacts of cruiseshipping and then act to mitigate them. Measurements of air emissions from cruise shipping should bemade publicly available. Upgrades and new investments in cruise terminals are planned for the comingyears and mitigation measures could be fruitfully incorporated into these plans.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — ITF 2017

PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORT – 9Piraeus as a cruise portThe leading cruise port in the East MediterraneanPiraeus ranks among the largest cruise ports in Europe, receiving close to a million cruise visitors in2015 (980 000 passengers). It is the largest cruise port of the east Mediterranean region, larger than allcruise ports in the Balkans, Turkey and Greece (Figure 1). Cruise passenger traffic consists mainly oftransit calls but Piraeus also acts partly as a turnaround port, with 29% of the passengers starting orfinishing their cruise at the port in 2015. This ranks Piraeus among the top ten turnaround ports in theMediterranean region, with almost a third more home-port passengers than Istanbul, the second largestturnaround port in the area.Figure 1. Top 20 Cruise ports in the Med in 20153Cruise Passengers (millions)2.521.5Transit1Turnaround0.50*Traffic figures for Kusadasi also take into account traffic at both the ports of Bodrum and AntalayaSource: Own elaborations based on Medcruise data.After strong growth between 2005 and 2011, passenger numbers have been declining almost allyears from 2011 to 2015. The general tendency in the Mediterranean region overall has been differentwith a stabilisation of passenger numbers rather than a decline. Over the last fifteen years, growth inCRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

10 – PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORTcruise passengers in Piraeus has been lower (95%) than the average in the Mediterranean (222%)(Figure 2). Whereas the average growth rebounded in 2015 with 6%, Piraeus showed a decline of 7%(MedCruise, 2016). The tendency might have started to reverse in 2016. During the first six monthscruise passenger numbers increased by 21% compared to the same period in 2015, according to thePiraeus Port Authority. Overall in 2016, passenger numbers have increased by over 10% compared to theprevious year, home-port calls rising by 24% over the period.Figure 2. Development of cruise passengers in main Mediterranean ports (2001-2015)Cruise passenger growth (index 2001 s200Average Med10002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Source: Own elaborations based on data from Cruise Industry News 2014; Medcruise (2015; 2016).The decrease in traffic is reflected in both transit and turnaround passenger numbers. The share ofturnaround passenger numbers has significantly decreased - from 42% to 29% - between 2010 and 2015(Figure 3). This could be related to the development of other cruise ports in the area. For instanceIstanbul, the second largest East Mediterranean home-port has more than doubled its number ofturnaround passengers between 2010 and 2015. However, it appears part of the turnaround traffic iscoming back in 2015 with an increase of 11% in turnaround passenger numbers compared to 2014,whilst transit passengers decreased over that same period. The first six months of 2016, there was afurther encouraging increase of 16% in turnaround passengers compared to the same period the previousyear, according to the Piraeus Chamber of Commerce. This could possibly be attributed to geopoliticaldevelopments related to Turkey, which is boosting the relative attractiveness of Piraeus as a turnaroundport compared to Istanbul. It is uncertain to what extent the extra traffic Piraeus receives due to thissituation will remain.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORT – 11Figure 3. Passenger numbers evolution per type (2010-2015)Cruise passengers 112012201320142015Source: MedCruise (2016).Long cruise season and short port staysCruise activities in Piraeus are concentrated in seven months of the year. 88% of cruise calls in 2014took place between April and October (Figure 4). However, there are cruise calls every month, which isnot the case at all cruise ports. The number of calls during the three least busy months is also not thatinsignificant; ranging between five and nine calls. October was the month with most calls in 2014.Greece has an attractive climate when the rest of Europe has cooler temperatures. The busiest cruisemonths also generally coincide with the tourism high-season resulting in very busy tourist attractions andsites around that period.Cruise ships stay in Piraeus for less than half a day on average. 73% of the cruise calls in 2014 inPiraeus had a duration ranging between 5 to 13 hours (Figure 5). The ships arrive in great majority veryearly in the morning; 78% of all cruise ships to Piraeus in 2014 arrived before 08:30 (Figure 6). Theytend to depart in the end of the afternoon; 55% of all cruise ships in 2015 departed from Piraeus between16:00 and 19:00 (Figure 7).The number of cruise ship calls is relatively small compared to other types of ships. Cruise isespecially small when put in perspective with the number of other passenger ship calls. In 2015, therewere 619 cruise ship calls and close to 14 000 calls of other passenger ships. Cruise ship calls haveremained relatively stable over the last ten years as opposed to other passenger calls that have sharplydecreased from 2007 to 2013. Cargo calls have also remained relatively stable, after the activity peakedin 2011 following COSCO's takeover of the container terminals. Hence, the share of cruise calls over thetotal number of calls at the port has increased. In 2006, cruise ship calls represented 2.9% of the totalcalls and in 2015 they represent over 3.5%. Due to developments in the shipping industry and markets,the average ship size calling at the port has also increased over the same period. This means that despitelittle growth or decrease in the number of ship calls, cargo volumes and passenger numbers may haveCRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

12 – PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORTincreased or remained stable. For instance in the container segment, there was no significant increase inthe number of calls but the amount of cargo passing through the port increased by close to 700% between2010 and 2015.Figure 4. Number of cruise calls in Piraeus per month (2014)1201081008680828673676046374020207950Source: Own elaboration based on data from Lloyds Marine Intelligence Unit.Figure 5. Cruise call duration in Piraeus (hours)100Number of cruise calls90807060504030201001 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48Source: Own elaborations based on data from Lloyds Marine Intelligence Unit.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORT – 13Figure 6. Cruise ship arrival times in 6:004:002:000:000627Source: Own elaborations based on Lloyds Marine Intelligence Unit.Figure 7. Cruise ship departure times in 6:004:002:000:000Source: Own elaborations based on Lloyds Marine Intelligence Unit.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017627

14 – PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORTFigure 8. Calls per ship type at the Port of Piraeus (2006-2015)Number of calls (thousands)252015Other passenger shipsCargo10Cruise502006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015Source: Piraeus Port Authority (2016).Competitiveness of Piraeus as a cruise portThe main asset of Piraeus as a cruise port is its dedicated infrastructure. There are currently 9 to 11simultaneous berthing positions (depending on ship size) for cruise ships. The total berth length is2.8 km, with the recent opening of an extra berth at the heart of the cruise port. Within its infrastructure,the port is ready to host the largest ships given that its longest berth line is 480 metres (m) long and depthat the terminals ranges between 11.5 and 12 m. As an indication, the largest ship on the market, TheHarmony of the Seas is 362 m long, 9.3 m deep and 66 m large. The largest ship that has called at thePort so far was the Quantum of the Seas which is 347 m long. In addition to the existing capacity, thecruise port is set to expand at the southwestern end of the port with three new berthing spots for verylarge cruise ships. For passenger handling, three state of the art terminal buildings are in use. Terminal Ais the busiest and closest to the city centre. Terminal B is located at the west extremity of the port, furtheraway from the city centre and the main public transport infrastructure. Terminal C was updated anddelivered recently to operate some of the turnarounds of the latest Carnival ship, the Carnival Vista. Theship has called at the port several times since June 2016 (Figure 9). The port offers quick processing ofpassengers and luggage in and out of the terminal. The whole cruise area complies with ISPS regulations.Because it is an important cargo and passenger port, cruise activities benefit from a wide range ofservices at the port. This is critical to the attractiveness of the port for cruise lines knowing that no othercruise port in Greece is able to provide them with such services. For instance, provisioning the ship withcontainerised goods (i.e. especially for fresh produce), drinking water and fuel is less possible in mostother Greek ports due to their reduced scale. This could explain why the port attracts some turnaroundtraffic, especially for Greece-only cruises.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORT – 15Figure 9. Cruise terminal location in PiraeusSource: Municipality of Piraeus, "Piraeus Cycling Implementation Plan", INTERREG IVC–CYCLECITIES (1307R4) (2014).The Attica region – in which Piraeus is located – is an attractive tourist destination and a strategicstop for cruise excursions. It benefits from a number of world-renowned tourist attractions as well as avery rich cultural heritage and a wide range of archeological sites. The city centre of Athens, where theAcropolis and the Plaka district are located, can be visited within a few hours, which is compatible withthe time constraints imposed by transit calls. The proximity of other sites outside of the city also enablesdifferent types of excursions, such as going to Corinth. Piraeus itself offers a number of attractions fortourists, numerous restaurants and leisure facilities that could provide a different type of experience forcruise passengers, especially those that have already visited Athens and its main tourist sites.The decision in 2016 to award 67% (initially 51% and an additional 16% after five years) of the shares ofPPA to COSCO Shipping has brought clarity after what has been a period of sustained flux anduncertainty. This new certainty will bring more stability and opportunities for cruise to grow. COSCOShipping has indicated that it will take care of the cruise activities itself. It has also confirmed itswillingness to implement the project for new cruise berths.CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

16 – PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORTChallenges to the attractiveness of PiraeusOne of the main challenges is connectivity both to the city centre and to the rest of Piraeus. Thepassenger port of Piraeus benefits from a good connectivity to the centre of Athens due to its proximityto the main train station, but it is not the case for the cruise terminal. It takes around 20 minutes to walkto main stations and the environment is not pedestrian friendly since it is along one of the busiest roadsof Piraeus. There is a new express bus (X80) running between the main cruise terminal (Terminal A) andSyntagma Square in the city centre; it takes half an hour to reach the city at a fare of EUR 4. Theproblem is that there is a lack of information concerning buses (routes, stops, schedules, lack oftranslation) and heavy traffic that makes the option not very attractive. As a result, most cruisepassengers are dependent on private buses from tour operators.The cruise terminal is also visually and physically separate from the most attractive parts of Piraeus.Current works to upgrade connectivity in Piraeus are contributing to making the environment hostile butthey should end within the next couple of years. Connectivity to the main transport infrastructure is alsoan issue for reaching the airport; it is possible to get there with the train by taking the green and blue(ISAP train) Metro lines, changing at the Monistiraki station, but the ride is long (at least 70 minutes). Adirect bus service is available from the passenger terminals but it is not easy to find and the ride is long.If there is traffic and on weekends, this is generally not a realistic option.Piraeus lacks most of the fundamental criteria required to attract a larger amount of turnaroundcalls. The Greek source market for cruise is small, Athens International Airport has limited airconnectivity and Piraeus lacks adapted tourist infrastructure. Greece is not very populated (11 millioninhabitants) and the economic climate implies that the majority of the population does not necessarilyhave the buying power to take a cruise. If there is no important local market for cruise, it is veryimportant to make sure people can easily access the port city by plane. There again, Athens is not verycompetitive compared to other homeports. For instance, it only has direct flight connections to the UnitedStates through New York, no more than once a day and only during some parts of the year. Istanbul,Piraeus's main competitor for cruise turnaround calls, has daily flights to seven US destinations. This ismainly explained by the high costs incurred for airlines due to high tax and duties.The Athens International Airport is one of the most expensive airports in Europe (Steer DaviesGleave, 2013). Restaurants, cafes and shops have to pay high rents and airlines high landing andpassenger fees. Efforts to bring fees down to attract more flights have been introduced in 2013 when theairport was the most costly in Europe (Georgakopoulos, 2013). Despite this, it remains expensive(according to COSCO). Other than access to the city, there are also restricted options to stay in Piraeusby the cruise port. The other element is that Piraeus lacks hotel capacity and a range of choices. Cruisepassengers have few options if they wish to stay close to the terminal. There is only one, old 5-star hotelwith a capacity of 57 rooms and almost no recent hotel facility in the area. Yet, his should change as twonew 5-star hotels are set to open in Piraeus within the next few years with a respective capacity of 500and 200 beds.Piraeus Port Authority and the city of Piraeus are also losing business opportunities due to excessivered-tape. High logistics costs are imposed on Greek exporters by lengthy and costly administrativeprocedures. The Piraeus Chamber of Commerce found that four to five documents are needed to exportgoods from Piraeus to ships at the port; several copies of the documents must be filled out which meansexporters or importers have to involve a third person to take care of the procedure. Other ministerialprovisions contribute to inefficiencies and reduce competition in the transport of goods, according theOECD Competition Assessment Review of Greece (2016). A number of restrictions on both retail andtourism-related sectors were also identified (OECD, 2014b). For instance most retail shops are notCRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

PIRAEUS AS A CRUISE PORT – 17allowed to open on Sunday with the exception of specific shops authorised by law, such as restaurantsand cafes shops in tourist areas, but this does not apply in Piraeus. The state also intervenes in theeconomic activity of various sectors of the industry - such as accommodation - creating barriers tocompetition. For instance, all hotels and licensees need to submit their price lists to the HellenicChamber of Hotels. There are also restrictions concerning price stability over defined periods of time, onthe possibility to change them and on discounts. All these restrictions require the intervention of acompetent authority, leaving little freedom to accommodate businesses.Figure 10. Pedestrian routes, paved roads and green areas in PiraeusSource: Municipality of Piraeus (2014).CRUISE SHIPPING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PIRAEUS — OECD/ITF 2017

IMPACT OF CRUISE SHIPPING ON THE PORT AND THE CITY – 19Impact of cruise shipping on the port and the cityEconomic impacts: Benefits for the region, but limited spillover to PiraeusCruise tourism's economic impact in the country is significant but remains rather low for the amountof cruise visits the country receives. The total direct revenue attributed to cruise shipping in the whole ofGreece was estimated at EUR 489 million, for a total of 1.988 million passengers in 2015 (CLIA, 2016;P&S Advisory, 2016). This corresponds to 0.25% of the country's GDP and 4.1% of the direct economicimpact of travel and tourism in Greece.1 Many indicators show us that the Greek economy does notbenefit from cruise shipping to the same extent as other cruise countries in Europe. Greece received 5.3%of Europe's cruise passengers but only 2.9% of the direct revenues generated by cruise lines andpassenger expenditures and 2.8% of the jobs created by the cruise industry in Europe.2 The averageyearly salary for each cruise-generated full-time job in Greece is EUR 18 882. This is significantly lowerthan the European average of EUR 30 650.3Two main factors can explain the limited revenues generated by cruise shipping in Greece perpassenger. A large part of the direct expenditure generated by the cruise industry goes to shipconstruction and repair for which Greece has little available capacity. Cruise line commercialexpenditures (advertising, market research, travel agencies) happen mostly in countries with large sourcemarkets, which is not the case of Greece. Around half of total cruise industry expenditures are generatedby these two sectors in Europe (National Bank of Greece, 2012). This contributes to the fact that Piraeusdoes not attract many turnaround calls, which is the last major way to generate high economic returnsfrom cruise shipping. Nevertheless, this does not mean that the economic impact of cruise shipping is notsignificant in the Athens region, which remains the largest cruise port in the country and the only one tobe able to provide a wide range of services to cruise lines.The direct economic impacts of cruise shipping in the Attica region presumably represent a majorpart of the total national impacts. Piraeus Port Authority receives close to 50% of the cruise traffic of thecount

Piraeus as a cruise port . The leading cruise port in the East Mediterranean . Piraeus ranks among the largest cruise ports in Europe, receiving close to a million cruise visitors in 2015 (980 000 passengers). It is the largest cruise port of the east Mediterranean region, larger than all c

Related Documents:

CRUISE 1) Cruise at .74 MACH. Alternative cruise: .77 MACH. 2) Hi-speed cruise at .81 @ fuel burn penalty. 3) Typical cruise altitude 20,000s FLs. 4) Fuel burn is 1540 pph per engine at FL240. 5) Headwinds will increase engine power, reduce cruise speed and decrease range. 6) Tailwinds will decrease engine power, increase cruise speed and increase range. 7) Follow previously entered FMC waypoints.

Urban Design is only is 85; there is no application fee. Further information and application form see the UDG website www.udg.org.uk or phone 020 7250 0892 Urban Degsi n groUp Urban U Degsi n groUp UrBan DesiGn145 Winter 2018 Urban Design Group Journal ISSN 1750 712X nortH aMeriCa URBAN DESIGN GROUP URBAN DESIGN

cruise industry trade association, has released the 2019 Cruise Trends and State of the Cruise Industry Outlook. The report offers a look at the trends impacting cruise travel in the coming year and beyond as well as the overall global economic impact. Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) is the unified

CRUISE Marine Refrigerators STANDARD CRUISE 36 CRUISE 42, 49 CRUISE 65, 85, 90, 100 CRUISE 130, 165 CRUISE 195, 200, . Frost-Free DRAWER 65 DRAWER 65 Frost-Free DRAWER 160 Frost-Free . installations exposed to sun and salt air. n

Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) released the State of the Cruise Industry Outlook 2017, revealing global cruise travel is continuing to grow at a steady pace. The outlook provides a snapshot of the global cruise industry while also forecasting trends that will impact cruise travel and the industry. 2

Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA), the world's largest cruise industry trade association, has released the 2018 State of the Cruise Industry Outlook. The report offers an in-depth look at the continued positive trajectory of the cruise industry's global economic impact as well as the trends impacting cruise travel in

SHIPPING INDUSTRY Institutional shareholders currently investing 1,200 in shipping companies listed in the US 49 Shipping companies currently listed in the US 35 Analysts who follow shipping industry 20.5B Total Market Cap in the Shipping Industry 13.8B Held by institutional and retail shareholders 2 Shipping Industry Overview

Access to Accounting Software – SAMS – Assessment book . 2 . Notes for students . This sample assessment is designed to demonstrate as many of the possible question types you may find in a live assessment. It is not designed to be used on its own to determine whether you are ready for a live assessment. In a live assessment, you will be required to upload documents as part of your evidence .