Prevention Through Design
NORSOK S‐002Working EnvironmentPrevention throughdesignBOHS 2014Hans Thore SmedboldPREPARED.
The presentation Field of applicationBackgroundBest of two worldsStructureSome challengesSummaryproactima.com
proactima.com
Risk level in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry Yearly monitring of risk levelAccidents, questionnaires, work related illnessess, special studies«The lowest» risk level in the industryLost Time Accidents40Frequencyper 48586878889909192939495969798990001O2O3O4O5O6O8O9
Key HSE RegulatorsMinistry ofHealth andCare ServicesMinistry ofClimate andEnvironmentMinistry ofPetroleumand EnergyMinistry ofLabour andSocial affairsNorwegianBoard ty(PSA)proactima.com
HSE RegulationsPetroleumActivities actWorkingFire & explosionEnvironment Act Prevention ActPollutionPrevention actActs relatedto HealthThe Framework HSE linesStandards (NORSOK, ISO, API, OLF, other)Operator specific Management SystemLocation/project specific procedures/processesproactima.comTechnical &operational
§ RegulationsThe WorkingEnvironmentActPSARegulationsProject specificrequirementsNORSOKProject specificrequirementsInternationalstandards(EN, ISO etc)proactima.com§ Frame Regulation§ FacilitiesRegulation§ Activity Regulation
Risk reduction principles As Low As Reasonably Practicable (ALARP)Best available technology (BAT)Prevention on work group levelPrecautionarySubstitution(Cost – Benefit)proactima.com
NORSOKNorsk konkurransefortrinn på norsk sokkel (Norwegian)(trans. Competitive and cost effective new building and modifications on the NorwegianContinental Shelf) S‐002 rev. 1 1993 (Terje Salbo (Statoil), Urban Kjellen (Hydro)) Last revision 2004 (rev. 4) Based on international standards and industry best practiceproactima.com
etroleum/proactima.comAll NORSOK construction standards are FREE
NORSOK S‐002 Working Environmentproactima.com
NORSOK S‐002 Human centered design process Extracts and presents core elements of 50‐60international WE standards It’s free (www.standard.no ), however, itmakes these international standardsmandatory for use in Norwegian Oil & Gasindustry, which is not free .proactima.com
proactima.com
proactima.com
The best of two worlds Prescriptive requirements Area requiremets (WEAL)proactima.comFunctional requirements Personal exposure
The core NORSOK S‐002 processproactima.com
NORSOK S‐002Working environmentIndustry standard for modifications andnew buildings of offshore installations WE program Design basis (WEAL) Activity list Systematically follow-up ofmodification and new buildings Worker involvement Required analyses Functional and descriptive requirements Knowledge requirementsproactima.com
proactima.com
WE requirements in NORSOK NORSOK C‐001 Living quarters areaNORSOK C‐002 Architectural components and equipmentNORSOK S‐002 Working EnvironmentNORSOK S‐005 Machinery Safety Other disciplinary standardsproactima.com
NORSOK S-002 gives an example of WE analyses and when theypreferable should be conducted in a normal projectproactima.com
Trends in project executionsSequential traditional long time planning and execution projectsFast track multi sequential projectsPlanning and execution of projects moves abroad (EU, America, Asia)proactima.com
Some reflections “The Project” ‐ a new first time experience for the projectorganization – but not for the industry The analyses require a mature understanding of themanning, operation and task required to operate theplatform / rig Area limits are difficult to implement in a design process The projects often fails in how they are addressing,implementing, and verifying that they are fulfilling thegoal oriented requirements in the projects The required analysis is done retrospective to documentcompliance with both Ch 4 and Ch 5 requirementsproactima.com
The futureNORSOK S‐002 is under revision Outdated references and terminologyDifficult to apply internationally“New” project modelsSome important requirements missingOverlaps with NORSOK S‐005 Hopefully issued for comments Q2‐3 2014proactima.com
Summary NORSOK S‐002 – proven use full A balance between descriptive and functionalrequirements Human / work task centered process Involvement of the workers in the design process Future ? Performance (emission) criteria's set for equipment Stricter and simplified requirements Analysis to prove compliance with functionalrequirements when not feasible to comply with thedescriptive requirementsproactima.com
proactima.comPrepared.proactima.com
Systematically follow‐up‐ The Working Environment Programme A WE programme shall be established forevery project phase. The WE programme may be a separatedocument or integrated into the project’sHSE programme, and shall be linked to theproject execution plan.proactima.com
Working Environment Programme The WE programme shall define the project’s WE objectives define risk acceptance criteria for occupationalsafety, human error and health risks State references to applicable WE requirementsand procedures describe means of ensuring the statutory workerparticipation in the design processproactima.com
Working Environment Programme The WE programme shall include an activity planstipulating the responsibilities, schedule anddeliverables for the various activities to manage WEin the design process. In particular, the WE analyses shall be planned withdue consideration of the needs for timely input todesign and procurement, and needs for verificationand documentation. The WE activity plan shall be maintained to providestatus regarding execution and documentation ofthe various WE management activities.proactima.com
Working Environment Programme Deviations from WE requirements shall be subject tothe project’s nonconformity procedures. A follow‐up system shall be established that enablesproper documentation, handling, follow‐up andcloseout of agreed actions and recommendations fromthe various WE studies and analysis in the project. TheWE follow‐up system shall be integrated in the overallHSE management system in the project.proactima.com
Working Environment Programme To document status regardingimplementation of WE requirements,Working Environment Area Charts (WEAC’s)shall be issued at predefined projectmilestones In principle, a WEAC shall be prepared foreach room and area on the installation.proactima.com
Working EnvironmentActivity Plan (example) This Working Environment Activity Plan (WEActivity Plan) provides information on WE activitiesand documentation to be performed or issued byxxx during execution of xxx EPCH Project. This activity plan supports project /1/ WorkingEnvironment Program, doc. no. xxx and isestablished for survey and status reportingbetween Company and Contractor throughoutProjectproactima.com
Working EnvironmentActivity Plan (example) The plan contains planning and status informationprovided in the following tables: Table 1: WE documentation and analysesTable 2: WE Area design reviewsTable 3: Specific WE reviews and analysesTable 4: Human Factor activities and analysisTable 5: WE Packages Follow‐UpTable 6: Familiarisation of WE Design Basisproactima.com
Activity Plan (example)Specific analysis and reviewsCoarse Chemical Health RiskAssessment (Coarse CHRA) ofDECK and HULL WE Design Review;WIND AND Detailed Chemical HRA;CHEMICAL SAMPLINGARRANGEMENTS WE Design Review;ACCESSTO EQUIPMENT, VALVES ANDINSTRUMENTS Detailed Chemical HRA;MEG &TEG SYSTEMS Detailed Chemical HRA; PIGGINGOPERATIONS WE Design Review;ACCESSTO FLOODLIGHTS, LIGHTFIXTURES, F&G, TELECOM Detailed Chemical HRA;CHEMICAL INJECTION SYSTEMSproactima.comWEATHER PROTECTION ERGONOMIC ANALYSIS OFMAJOR MANUAL WORK
WE Package Follow‐Up (example)BE: Bid EvaluationDR: Design ReviewPI/SI: Package/Site InspectionNoise: Includes noise activity ER252 GAS COMPRESSORS(CENTRIFUGAL) – High priority BE DR PINoise ER254 PROCESS & UTILITY PUMP – Medium priority BE Noise ER255 EMERGENCY & ESSENTIAL DIESEL GENERATOR – High priority BEDR PI Noise ER256 NITROGEN COMPRESSOR, AIR COMPRESSORS – Medium priorityBE Noiseproactima.com
WE requirements in NORSOK NORSOK C‐001 Living quarters area NORSOK C‐002 Architectural components and equipment NORSOK S‐002 Working Environment NORSOK S‐005 Machinery Safety Other disciplinary standards
Intrusion Prevention: Signature Policies 201 Intrusion Prevention: Signature Policies - New 203 Intrusion Prevention: Sensors 204 Intrusion Prevention: Sensor - New 205 Intrusion Prevention: Sensor - Associating Sensor to a Firewall Policy 206 Intrusion Prevention: Alerts and Reports 208 Intrusion Prevention: View Rule File 210
prevention of substance misuse. This "prevention set-aside" is managed by the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) in SAMHSA and is a core component of each state's prevention system. On average, SAPT Block Grant funds make up 68% of primary prevention funding in states and territories. In 21 states, the prevention set-aside .
Integration of substance abuse prevention, mental health promotion and primary care across the lifespan Shifting from the delivery of prevention services to the development of Prevention Systems that deliver prevention services based on the Strategic Prevention Framework Focus more on population level or environmental change
of sight lines. CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. 12 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Guidebook THE “THREE D” APPROACH CPTED involves the design of the physical space in the context of the normal and expected
Procedures is a publication of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control of the Cen-ters for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Julie L. Gerberding, M.D., M.P.H., Director Coordinating Center for Environmental Health and Injury Prevention Henry Falk, M.D., M.P.H., Director National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Ileana Arias, Ph.D .
Prevention of Drug use anD Problematic use Prevention of Drug use anD Problematic use 1 UN Office on Drugs and Crime. International standards on drug use prevention. Vienna, 2013, p 1. introDuction Prevention of drug use, particularly among young people, is almost always a central goal in national policies on illicit drugs, as well as in
Bullying Prevention Capacity Assessment User Guide The Bullying Prevention Capacity Assessment includes questions that will help those using the tool to assess the current state of prevention, to help guide the implementation of effective bullying prevention activities and programs. The User Guide provides an orientation to this
3.1 Policy for Fall Prevention 3.1.1 A policy for fall prevention will set clear and unambiguous terms on the organisation's approach and commitment towards fall prevention. 3.1.2 Top management with executive or site responsibility shall define, endorse and document its policy for fall prevention. The policy for fall prevention shall be appropriate to the needs, nature and scale of the
