RCED-97-160R Forest Service: Construction Of National .

3y ago
58 Views
4 Downloads
980.65 KB
24 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Bria Koontz
Transcription

GAOUnited StatesGeneral Accounting Of&eWashington, D.C. 20548Resources, Community,Economic DevelopmentandDivisionB-276881May 27, 1997The Honorable John R. KasichChairman, Committee on the BudgetHouse of RepresentativesSubject:Forest Service:RoadsConstructionof NationalForestDear Mr. Chairman:As agreed with your office, we are providing you with information on theForest Service’s road-building program. We briefed your office on the resultsof our work on May 21, 1997.Our objectives were to (1) describe how the Forest Service determines theneed for and the types of roads to be constructed in national forests,(2) determine how and why the Forest Service’s road-building costs differ fromthose of other timber sellers, and (3) identify actions the Forest Service couldtake to reduce these costs. These issues are discussed below and inenclosure 1, which includes the presentation provided at our briefing. Wereviewed the Forest Service’s policies, procedures, and plans to determine howthe Forest Service identifies the need for and the types of forest roads toconstruct. We also compared the Forest Service’s policies, procedures, andplans with similar information obtained from the Bureau of Land Management,the Bureau of Indian Affairs, three Indian tribes, and six states to identifydifferences in the treatment of road construction costs. In addition, weinterviewed purchasers of federal timber, timber industry representatives,andmembers of the environmental community to identify actions that the ForestService could take to reduce its forest road construction costs.GAO/RCED-97-160R NationalForest Roads

B-276881SUMMARYThe Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (PublicLaw 93-378), as amended, requires that the national forests construct anadequate and safe system of forest roads. To comply with this requirementand to determine the need for permanent forest roads, each national forestprepares a forest management plan. Forest plans, which cover a period of upto 15 years, are designed to, among other things, identify forest road needs onthe basis of such factors as public access, the location of planned timber sales,programmed wildlife management activities, and efforts to improve timberstands, such as thinning and fertilizing.However, forest plans, most of whichwere prepared and approved 10 to 15 years ago, may be outdated because theconditions on national forests, such as the volume of timber that can beharvested, may have changed significantly-perhapsnegating the need for someor all of the roads identified in the plans.There are three primary differences in road construction costs between theForest Service and other federal and state timber sellers. Specifically:-Harvesting timber often requires that a timber purchaser construct accessroads to move logging equipment into and out of timber harvest areas andto transport harvested logs. The Forest Service and most of the otherfederal and state timber sellers we reviewed generally use similar guidelinesto estimate the costs of the access roads to be constructed by a timberpurchaser. However, in accordance with the National Forest Roads andTrails Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-657), the Forest Service may give “roadcredits” to a timber purchaser equal to the estimated costs of constructingforest roads. The timber purchaser can use the road credits instead of cashto pay for some of the harvested timber. On the other hand, other federaland state timber sellers generally do not give road credits to timberpurchasers. They require that the purchasers factor road construction costsinto their bids for the timber, and it is generally assumed that purchaserslower their bids to account for these costs. However, whether there is adollar-for-dollarreduction in the bids is not known.-Of the timber sellers we reviewed that give road credits, only the ForestService is required by law to treat road credits as receipts even though nocash is actually received for the timber. The federal government is requiredby the 1908 Twenty-Five Percent Fund Act to pay the states in whichnational forests are located 25 percent of all Forest Service receipts derivedeach year from each national forest. In 1976, the National ForestManagement Act required that Forest Service road credits be included as2GAOIRCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

B-276881receipts in calculating the 25percent payment to the states. In fiscal year1996, about 41 million in road credits were used by timber purchasers topay for timber. As a result, the federal government paid more than 10million to the states.Although the Forest Service and most of the other federal and state timbersellers we reviewed use similar cost guidelines to construct roads, roadcosts are not entirely comparable because, in some cases, the ForestService constructs roads to a higher safety standard. The Forest Service’spolicy provides that some national forest roads remain open after timberharvesting has been completed so that Forest Service employees cancontinue to perform their forest management responsibilitiesand the publiccan access forest resources for such activities as hunting, camping, andfishing. The Forest Service roads that remain open cost more because theymust be designed to higher standards to ensure the public’s safety andprotect the resources. While some of the other federal and state timbersellers permit public access to some roads, this access is more limited thanthat of the Forest Service, thus allowing the other sellers to have fewerroads designed to higher safety standards.,Timber industry representatives, environmentalists,and purchasers of federaltimber suggested to us various actions that the Forest Service could take toreduce its forest road costs and still improve public safely on forest roads,reduce the impact of forest roads on the environment, and improve the abilityof the Forest Service to fully maintain the national forest road system. Forexample, although the Forest Service already does some cost sharing, it couldenter into more cost-sharing agreements with other federal, state, and privateagencies that benefit from the roads. Also, because many forest road plansmay be outdated-someroads may no longer be needed-it was suggested thatthe Forest Service could’defer further construction of new roads except forthose roads already approved and those roads needed to protect sensitiveareas, pending the completion of a detailed review of the current resource andmanagement needs in the national forests. In addition, it was suggested thatthe Forest Service could eliminate road credits and require timber purchasersto construct roads as part of the timber sale contract. However, it is assumedthat this action would lower timber receipts because the purchasers wouldreduce their bids to account for some or all of the estimated road costs. Inaddition, the Forest Service would not pay 25 percent of the purchasers’ roadcredits to the states, a requirement that was authorized by the National ForestManagement Act of 1976.3GAO/RCED-97-160R NationalForest Roads

B-276881AGENCY COMMENTSWe provided the Department of Agriculture, the Forest Service, theDepartment of the Interior, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Bureauof Indian Affairs with a draft of this report for comment. We met with ForestService officials, including the Acting Director and other members of theNational Forest System engineering staff. These officials agreed with theinformation presented in the draft report and suggested clarii?cations to ourreport that we incorporated as appropriate.Department of the Interior,Bureau of Land Management, and Bureau of Indian Affairs officials did nothave any comments on the draft report.We performed our work from September 1996 through April 1997 inaccordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.Please call me at (206) 287-4810 if you or your staff have any questions. Majorcontributors to this report were Edward M. Zadjura, John S. Kalmar, Jr.,Araceli Contreras, June M. Foster, Hugo H. Wolter, Jr., and Robert B. Arthur.nergy, Resources,Enclosurec/GAO/WED-97-160RNationalForest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSUREIG U Resources Community, and EconomicDevelopmht DivisionReview of the Forest Service’s roadbuilding program5GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwFOREST SERVICE ROADSObjectiveslll6ENCLOSURE IHow does the Forest Service determineits need for forest roads?How and why do the Forest Service’sroad-building costs differ from othertimber sellers’?What changes could be made to reducethe Forest Service’s road-building costs?GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roadsi

ENCLOSUREtzf IENCLOSURE IFOREST SERVICE ROADSScopelAgencies contactedlllForest Service: HQ; Regions 1,3,6;Lolo, Coconino, and Umpqua NFsBureau of Land Management:Arizona, Oregon, and MontanaBureau of Indian Affairs/NativeAmerican Tribes: Confederated Salishand Kootenai, White River Ft. Apache,Warm SpringsGAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IGAQ FOREST SERVICE ROADSScopelOther groups contactedlCongressional Research Service,industry trade groups, timberpurchasers, environmental groups*I. .GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads::;.

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IGcK) FOREST SERVICE ROADSBackgroundlAbout 380,000 miles of roads in FY ‘96ll5 maintenance levels generallyrepresent the quality and drivabilityll9Forest Service estimates that roadsystem is about 90% completed5highestlevel, paved, high speed4--paved or gravel surface, lowerspeed for carsGAOIRCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwENCLOSURE IFOREST SERVICE ROADSBackground3--gravel or natural surface, suitablefor carsllll102--rough, natural surface, highclearance vehiclesl--closed to vehicular traffic70% of FS roads are level 1 or 2GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwENCLOSUREIFOREST SERVICE ROADSBackgroundSince FY ‘90, road building has declined11FY ‘90FY ‘96Miles built1,924435Miles rebuilt4,4362,801GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwENCLOSURE IFOREST SERVICE ROADSBackgroundExpenditures ( mil)AppropriatedPurchaser credit,SubtotalPayments to states,TotalFY ‘90FY ‘96 147.0 84.3119.341.3 266.3 125.629.810.3 296.1 135.91. Timber purchasers are required to build any roads specified in timber sale contracts. In return, the Forest Servicegrants them a credit against the timber sale price equal to the estimated cost of the roadwork.2. By law, states receive 25 percent of all receipts generated on national forest lands.credits have been included as receipts in calculating the 25-percent payment.12Since 1976, purchaser roadGAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IwFOREST SERVICE ROADSBackgroundMaintenance expenditures have alsodeclinedDollars spent ( mil)FY ‘90FY ‘96 96.9 77.1Milesfully maintained172,100 152,800not fully maintained 190,900 227,40013GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE1wENCLOSUREIFOREST SERVICE ROADSHow does the FS determine road needs?Forest plans identify the need for roadsbased on timber sales, resourcemanagement, and public access needs.llllForest plans cover a 10-l 5-year periodand can take up to 10 years to develop;most plans, which were approved over10 years ago, may be outdated becauseconditions have changed significantly.Roads are planned/designedstaff, including engineers.by forestGAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IGAQFOREST SERVICE ROADSHow does the FS determine road needs?ll15Road construction and reconstruction arefunded by appropriations and timber salepurchaser road credits (PRC).Timber sale PRCs are based on FS’estimate of road construction andreconstruction costs using regional costguides. The estimate includes a profitmargin for purchasers.GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSUREIENCLOSURE IGAQ FOREST SERVICE ROADSDifferences between FS and otherslSince 1964, FS has used PRCs to payfor road construction and reconstruction.ll16FS credits the cost of the road againstthe purchaser’s cost of the timber.No direct accountability for theaccuracy of FS’ PRC cost estimatesbecause purchasers are not requiredto report actual costs of constructionand reconstruction.GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwFOREST SERVICE ROADSDifferences between FS and othersllBLM and BIA do not use PRCs. Theirpurchasers construct and reconstructroads as part of the timber sale contract;it is believed that purchasers lower theirbids by the amount of road costs.Construction & maintenance costs vary.lI17ENCLOSURE IConstruction costs should be similar ifthe same road is built in the samegeographic area, since all agenciesgenerally use similar cost guides.GAO/WED-97- 160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwENCLOSURE IFOREST SERVICE ROADSDifferences between FS and othersFS roads may be built to a somewhathigher standard, since they may beleft open for recreation and otheruses and may be subject to applicableFederal Highway Administration(FHWA) safety standards.llSince FS leaves roads open,maintenance is higher, especially tomeet safety and resource protectionneeds.GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IG/Q FOREST SERVICE ROADSDifferences between FS and othersl19By law, the federal government paysan amount equal to 25% of PRCs’tostates in which national forests arelocated.GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IENCLOSURE IG W FOREST SERVICE ROADSChanges that could lower road costs0Because of concerns about safety, theenvironment, and FS’ ability to maintainits existing road system, suggestionshave been made to us that FS couldlDefer construction of new roadsexcept for those already approved andthose needed to protect sensitiveareas, pending a detailed review ofcurrent forest needs:.:20GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IwFOREST SERVICE ROADSChanges that could lower road costsll21ENCLOSURE IInclude road construction andreconstruction in timber sale contractsas BLM and BIA do (reduces FS’timber sale receipts and 25% paymentto states)Enter into more cost-sharingagreements with other federal, state,and private agencies that benefit fromthe roadsGAOIRCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

ENCLOSURE IGMENCLOSURE IFOREST SERVICE ROADSChanges that could lower road costsllReduce the category of roads and theassociated usage, thus lowering theamount of maintenance neededClose or obliterate roads that do notprovide access to recreation areas orare no longer needed to manageforest resources(140543)22GAO/RCED-97-160R National Forest Roads

OrderingInformationThe first copy of each GAO report and testimony is free.Additionalcopies are 2 each. Orders should be sent to thefollowingaddress, accompanied by a check or money ordermade out to the Superintendentof Documents, whennecessary. VISA and Mastercardcredit cards are accepted, also.Orders for 100 or more copies to be mailed to a single addressare discounted 25 percent.Ordersby mail:U.S. General AccountingOfficeP.O. Box 6015Gaithersburg,MD 20884-6015or visit:Room 1100700 4th St. NW (corner of 4th and G Sts. NW)U.S. General AccountingOfficeWashington,DCOrders may also be placed by calling (202) 512-6000or by using fax number (301) 2534066, or TDD (301) 413-0006.Each day, GAO issues a list of newly available reports andtestimony.To receive facsimile copies of the daily list or anylist from the past 30 days, please call (202) 512-6000 using atouchtonephone. A recorded menu will provide informationonhow to obtain these lists.For informationon how to access GAO reports on the INTERNET,send an e-mail message with “info” in the body to:info@www.gao.govor visitGAO’s World Wide Web Home Page at:http://www.gao.gov

United StatesGeneral AccountingOfficeWashington,D.C. 20548-0001OfficialPenaltyBusinessfor PrivateAddressCorrectionIUse 300RequestedBulk Rat?Postage & Fees PaidGAOPermit No. GlOO

reduce its forest road costs and still improve public safely on forest roads, reduce the impact of forest roads on the environment, and improve the ability of the Forest Service to fully maintain the national forest road system. For example, although the Forest Service already does some cost sharing, it could .

Related Documents:

(A) boreal forest º temperate forest º tropical rain forest º tundra (B) boreal forest º temperate forest º tundra º tropical rain forest (C) tundra º boreal forest º temperate forest º tropical rain forest (D) tundra º boreal forest º tropical rain forest º temperate forest 22. Based on the

Air-Cooled Liquid Chillers Reversible heat pumps 30RB/30RQ 040R-160R Rated cooling capacity 40-160 kW R-32. 2. CONTENTS . must not restrict the unit's air flow. IMPORTANT: Before lifting the unit, check that all enclosure panels and grilles are securely fixed in place. Lift and set

Page 4 GAO/RCED-S674 Airline Computerized Reservation Systems . The Conflicting Estimates of CRS Profitability In March 1986 United presented testimony before the Senate Subcom- mittee on Aviation in which it estimated its internal rate of return (IRR) on its Apollo system to be 5 percent over the period 1975-87. .

D. Mixed Evergreen/Deciduous Forest 38 1. Salt Dome Hardwood Forest * 38 2. Coastal Live Oak-Hackberry Forest * 39 3. Barrier Island Live Oak Forest * 39 4. Shortleaf Pine/Oak-Hickory Forest * 39 5. Mixed Hardwood-Loblolly Forest * 40 7. Slash Pine/Post Oak Forest * 40 8. Live Oak-Pine-Magnolia Forest * 40 9. Spruce Pine-Hardwood Flatwood * 41

Submit questions to communityforest@fs.fed.us U.S. Forest Service Community Forest and Open Space Conservation Program Frequently Asked Questions (September 2013) General What is meant by the term "Community Forest"? The CFP rule defines Community Forest as "Forest land owned in fee-simple by an eligible entity that

Temperate deciduous forest Taiga, (coniferous forest) Arctic tundra (polar grasslands) Tropical savanna, thorn forest Tropical scrub forest Tropical deciduous forest Tropical rain forest, tropical evergreen forest Desert Ice Mountains (complex zonation) Semidesert, arid grassland Tropic of Capricorn Equator Tropic of Cancer

The case for using forest biomass . 6. 7. 10. 11. Ontario's forest biomass advantage. 12. Leadership in the green economy . Spotlight: Integrating biomass in Resolute Forest Products' Northwestern Ontario operations . Sustainable forest policy framework . Spotlight: Forest biomass and the Managed Forest carbon cycle .

Description Logic Reasoning Research Challenges Reasoning with Expressive Description Logics – p. 2/40. Talk Outline Introduction to Description Logics The Semantic Web: Killer App for (DL) Reasoning? Web Ontology Languages DAML OIL Language Reasoning with DAML OIL OilEd Demo Description Logic Reasoning Research Challenges Reasoning with Expressive Description Logics – p. 2/40. Talk .