The Experience Of Work - Citrix

3y ago
12 Views
2 Downloads
787.09 KB
6 Pages
Last View : 5m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Josiah Pursley
Transcription

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementThe experience of workThe role of technology in productivityand engagementResearch suggests that the more engagedemployees are in their work, the more likelythey are to be productive, self-starting andinnovative. Unfortunately, only a minority ofemployees are actually fully engaged. Thepush to improve engagement has promptedmany organisations to consider the holistic,subjective experience they create for theirworkers, the so-called employee experience.But which factors contribute to a positiveemployee experience? What role, if any, doestechnology play in shaping it? And how cancompanies improve collaboration acrossdivisional silos to create a more productiveand engaging experience for their staff?To answer these questions, The EconomistIntelligence Unit surveyed over 1,000 seniorexecutives, including IT and HR leaders, andconducted a series of in-depth interviews. Thisexecutive summary presents the key findings.Key findings The employee experience is high on themanagement agenda, and improvedproductivity and engagement arethe top two expected outcomes. Leadership and management are themost influential determinants of theemployee experience. Technology ismore likely to be seen as a primaryfactor among companies withhigher self-reported employeeengagement and productivity, andamong those with more advanceddigital transformation initiatives. Ease of access to informationand the ability to access it fromanywhere are the most importantcharacteristics of the technologythat helps shape a positive employeeexperience, respondents believe. Executive ownership of the employeeexperience is often shared, whichmay explain why only a minority ofrespondents strongly agree that theytake personal responsibility for it. Making sure that technology has apositive impact on the employeeexperience will require collaborationbetween IT and HR. High-performingcompanies are more likely to havetaken measures such as employingcross-functional specialists and definingshared key performance indicators.Sponsored by The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20191

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementAbout the researchThe Economist Intelligence Unitsurveyed 1,145 business executives inMarch and April 2019. The respondentshail from eight countries (the US, theUK, Germany, Australia, New Zealand,Japan, China and Brazil) and work insix sectors (automotive, energy/oiland gas, financial services, healthcare,manufacturing and retail). They havesenior roles in their organisations, justunder half (49%) being C-level executivesand the remainder directors, businessunit or department heads, and seniormanagers. The vast majority (81%)work in businesses employing over500 people, while nearly half (48%)are at companies with over 5,000.The survey analysis identifiedDriven by productivity andengagementThe employee experience is squarely onthe management radar in large businesses,according to the executives interviewed forthis study. It is a matter of senior managementdiscussion at the vast majority (81%) ofsurveyed firms. Many businesses haveestablished management roles with explicitresponsibilities in this area (and even the exactterm in the title).significant differences in responsepatterns in two areas: Digital development. “Digitally moremature” organisations are thosethat have been implementing adigital transformation strategy formore than two years. These arecompared with “digitally less mature”organisations, where strategyhasn’t been developed yet. Engagement and productivity. “Highperformers” strongly agree thatemployees at their organisation aremore engaged in their work and moreproductive than at industry peers, andthat they are more productive in theirwork than at peers. “Low performers”do not agree with either statement.The most common business outcomesthat companies seek from improvingtheir employee experience are improvedproductivity and engagement. Althoughthe direction of causality is not entirelyclear, the survey suggests that these twoqualities are strongly linked to the employeeexperience. Half of the respondents whoreport that engagement and productivityamong employees are higher than those oftheir rivals (“high performers”)1 also say therehas been an improvement in their employeeWe identified “high”, “middle” and “low” performers based on the extent of respondents’ agreement with two statements put to them in the survey:that employees at their organisation are more engaged in their work than at industry peers, and that they are more productive in their work than atpeers. High performers agreed “strongly” with both statements; middle performers agreed “strongly” or “somewhat” with both; and low performersdid not agree with either. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 201912

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementFigure 1: The benefits of experienceBusiness outcomes obtained or expected from an improved employee experience(% of respondents)010203040Improved employee productivity43Improved employee engagement41Improved customer experience and satisfaction36Improved profitability31Improved talent retention30Improved innovation/creativity28Accelerated digital transformation2321Improved talent recruitmentImproved brand perception5016Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit.experience in the past two years. Thiscompares to just one in ten of respondentfirms that do not report higher engagementand productivity (“low performers”). Digitallymore mature firms are also more likely thanless mature ones to report such improvement.But the employee experience is not an entirelyinward-facing agenda: in our survey, morethan a third of respondents’ companies areseeing, or expect to see, better customerexperience and satisfaction as a result of theirefforts to improve the employee experience.The role of technologyIt is difficult to overstate the role thatstrong leadership plays in the outcomesassociated with an improved employeeexperience. When asked to rank thecontributing factors, respondents placedleadership and management at the top—and with a more emphatic responsethan any other factor, including pay.In the overall sample, technology ranks justbehind organisational purpose and culture asa determinant of the employee experience.However, both the high performers and thedigitally more mature groups put technologyon a much higher level. This suggeststhat the factor has been a driver of theaforementioned improvement in employeeexperience, as noted by both groups.Among the various ways employeesinteract with technology, it is the ability toaccess and share information that has thegreatest bearing on improved engagement,productivity and, ultimately, a betteremployee experience. The ability to work fromanywhere is a close second for respondents.Almost half of high performers (46%) stateemphatically that the applications anddevices an organisation provides make apositive contribution to the employees’working experience. However, if not managedcarefully, technology initiatives may have The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20193

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementFigure 2: The burden of leadershipThe factors perceived to contribute most to an improved employee experience(% of respondents who rank each factor 1st, 2nd or 3rd#)All respondentsLeadership andmanagementEngagement and productivityHigh performersLow performers59Salaries/contract terms594336Flexible working policies3632Organisationalpurpose/culture3432The technology availableto employees33Social relationships withinthe organisation31Workplace design225637Health/wellbeingpractices and policies38413622Digital maturityMore matureLess 21Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit.unintended effects: 44% of respondents firmlybelieve that inadequately specified or poorlyimplemented technology can have a negativeimpact on the employee experience. Oftenthis is the result of workplace deploymentsthat fail to pay enough attention to changemanagement, interviewees suggest.Taking ownershipBy its holistic nature, the employeeexperience cuts across every facet of anorganisation. This may explain why shapingthe employee experience is more often ashared responsibility among multiple seniorexecutives rather than the ownership of one.When the latter is the case, the chief humanresources officer (CHRO) is more likely totake the lead than other C-level peers.Shared responsibility can often result ina vacuum, however, and many surveyrespondents evidently believe theemployee experience is someone else’sproblem. Little more than a third (34%) ofC-suite respondents strongly agree thatthey take full responsibility for it acrossthe organisation. Only a handful more(39%) say that they take full responsibilityfor it even within their own teams.Among the global sample, the chiefinformation officer (CIO) is the least likelyC-Suite role to have ownership of theemployee experience. Again, this varied bymaturity: at digitally more mature businesses,the CIO is more likely to share the leadershipof these efforts than at less mature ones.IT leaders from more advanced companieswere also more likely to take the employeeexperience seriously, the survey shows. ITexecutives from high-performing and digitallymore mature organisations are more likely to The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20194

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementFigure 3: Employee experience on the IT agendaIT perspectives on the employee experience(% of IT respondents who “strongly agree”)Our IT department has the authorityto design and select systems tooptimise the employee experienceAll respondentsEngagement and productivityHigh performersLow performers4368Improving the employee experience isan explicit goal of our IT strategy4155Employee experience should be a keyconsideration in all IT projects39562714Digital maturityMore matureLess mature45483044383231Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit.strongly agree that the employee experienceshould be a consideration in all IT projects,that it is an explicit goal of their IT strategy,and that they are authorised to design andselect systems to optimise it.IT and HR: Working togetherand levels of engagement. But many firmsin the survey go beyond this. For example,a third of the overall sample (and 43% ofhigh performers) strongly affirm that they’veestablished key performance indicatorsused by both IT and HR to measureaspects of the employee experience.Given the HR function’s apparent leadershiprole with respect to the employee experienceand its natural authority on issues relatedto employees, it stands to reason thatensuring technology has a positive impacton that experience will require effectivecollaboration between IT and HR.Several of the surveyed organisations—aswell as those interviewed for the study—aredeveloping specialists with combined HRand IT expertise in order to reduce barriers.Just under a third of the overall sample(40% of high performers) confirms they dothis to help bridge the two departments.Some formidable barriers stand in the wayof that collaboration, however. Paramountamong these are the familiar featuresof large, siloed organisations: a lack ofmutual understanding and few commonobjectives. These cannot be broken downeasily, but many organisations are findingways to build bridges. It helps when CIOsand CHROs view digital transformationas a shared project, as over a third ofrespondents confirm is the case at their firm.In the longer term, for HR and IT collaborationto become an everyday reality that is gearedtowards a better employee experience—and in all areas where employees interactwith technology—outlooks need to change.Encouragingly, that recognition doesappear to be top of mind. HR leaders oftomorrow, many respondents believe, willneed to be knowledgeable in technologiessuch as artificial intelligence and analyticsto guide and improve employee work andexperience. At the same time, future ITleaders will need more insight into humanfactors such as engagement and wellbeing.It also helps that IT supports HR in buildingdigital means of tracking employee attitudes The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20195

THE EXPERIENCE OF WORKThe role of technology in productivity and engagementFigure 4: The need for common groundThe toughest barriers to effective HR-IT collaboration(% of respondents)0102030Lack of mutual understanding34Lack of common objectives/key performance indicators32Lack of budget28Other priorities take precedence28Lack of time23Lack of interest on the other party’s sideGeographical distance from one another401916Source: The Economist Intelligence Unit.While every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy of this information, The EconomistIntelligence Unit Ltd. cannot accept any responsibility or liability for reliance by any person onthis report or any of the information, opinions or conclusions set out in this report.The findings and views expressed in the report do not necessarily reflect the views of thesponsor. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 20196

experience. Half of the respondents who report that engagement and productivity among employees are higher than those of their rivals . When the latter is the case, the chief human resources officer (CHRO) is more likely to take the lead than other C-level peers. Shared responsibility can often result in

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

There is no Citrix Client after update push for upgrade from Citrix Plug-in 11.2 to Citrix Receiver 3.3. Issue. SCCM successfully uninstalled Citrix Plug-in 11.2, but the install of Citrix Receiver 3.3 did not process. Resolution. Run the "Citrix Receiver 3.3 Up

Citrix Receiver 3.3 correctly, all older version of the Citrix Client must be uninstalled. The following steps should be taken to make sure The all old Citrix Clients are uninstalled, and then install the new Citrix Receiver 3.3. . Once you uninstall a

Verify Citrix Workspace version a. Click on the desktop to bring up Finder and then click "Applications" under the "Go" menu. b. Locate and click on "Citrix Workspace" and verify the version is at least 18.9.0. The Citrix client was recently renamed from Citrix Receiver to Citrix Workspace. If Citrix Receiver is currently installed