Application Of Subtractive Rapid Prototyping (SRP) For RSP .

2y ago
18 Views
2 Downloads
2.64 MB
100 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Eli Jorgenson
Transcription

Application of Subtractive Rapid Prototyping (SRP)For RSP ToolingPrepared by:Pratik E. NikamResearch AssistantJohn L. Frater, Ph.D., P.E.ProfessorMechanical Engineering DepartmentCleveland State UniversityJune 6, 2005

AbstractThe work performed under this project was performed by Mr. Pratik E. Nikam as a partof his MSME program under the supervision of Dr. John L. Frater. Mr. Nikam’s mastersthesis makes up the body of this report and was approved by a faulty committee in theFenn College of Engineering. This project demonstrates that Subtractive RapidPrototyping (SRP) is a powerful tool reduce the time required to fabricate a forging dieby the Rapid Solidification Process (RSP).The RSP Tooling process facilitates the manufacture of a forging die within five daysfrom the time that the die has been designed using a solid modeling computer program.There are two lengthy time constraints in this process. The first is the fabrication of apattern of the die from the solid model. Historically this has been done using thesteriolithography process and takes approximately two days. The second time constraintis the process is the a ceramic casting of the pattern that forms the target that the metal isspayed at. This second process also takes about two days. This program addressed thefirst of these time.The results of this program demonstrate that patterns can be fabricated using a low costSRP device such as a desk top CNC milling machine. For this project a Roland MDX 15machine was used; however, any SRP device could have been used. This machine cost 2995 which is well below the cost of a steriolithography machine. For a modelingmaterial three different Ren Boards (Cured Polyurethane) were used; Ren Shape 450,Ren Shape 460 and Ren Shape 5003. The Ren Shape 150 was too porous, and did notresult in a suitable die although this material was the easies to machine and resulted in thebest surface finish. The Ren Shape 5003 was too hard, and the SRP machine could notmachine it. Finally, the Ren Shape 460 resulted in a pattern with excellent surface finishand worked very will in the RSP tooling process.As a result of this project, the patterns for the RSP Tooling process can bemade in the engineering department itself, or an a related laboratoryfacility. There is no need to make costly steriolithography patterns in aservice bureau. Most importantly, the patterns can be made in a matter ofa few hours rather than two days.

APPLICATION OF SUBTRACTIVE RAPIDPROTOTYPING TOTHE DESIGN ANDMANUFACTURE OF RAPID SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSTOOLINGPRATIK E. NIKAMBachelor of Science in Mechanical EngineeringMaharashtra Institute of Technology, Pune, IndiaMay, 2000Submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements forthe degreeMASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICALENGINEERINGat theCLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITYSpring, 2005

This Thesis has been approvedfor the Department of MECHANICAL ENGINEERINGand the college of graduate studies byThesis Committee Chairperson, Dr. John L. FraterDepartment / DateDr. Asuquo EbianaDepartment / DateDr. L. Kenneth KeysDepartment / Date

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTCompleting a thesis of this nature necessitates a considerable amount of help andguidance. Even entailing a lot of personal effort, this work would lack its charm withoutthe valuable inputs and support from several quarters.I owe my sincere appreciation and deep sense of gratitude to my advisor Dr. JohnL. Frater, Ph.D. P.E., Mechanical Engineering Department, Cleveland State Universityfor his constant encouragement, meticulous supervision, and constructive criticism all ofwhich was instrumental in the successful completion of this thesis. I would like toparticularly thank him for enabling me to visit Detroit, Michigan for the FIA (ForgingIndustry Association) technological fair, and also for providing me with the opportunityto visit RSP (Rapid Solidification Process) Tooling LLC, Solon, Ohio to gain a practicalunderstanding of my thesis work.I am extremely grateful to the Mr. Wayne Phelps, Bula Forge for providingsuitable die for my thesis, Ms Karen Lewis, Forging Industry Educational and ResearchFoundation, and Mr. James Knirsch, President and CEO of RSP Tooling, LLC forsupport he has provided to this program.I am indebted to Dr. Ebiana and Dr. Keys for their valuable presence in my thesisevaluation committee and for their continued support and suggestions.My profound thanks go to all the other professors of the Mechanical EngineeringDept, at Cleveland State University for all the help rendered in the course of my study.My kind regards go to my friends and fellow students for all the encouragementprovided in the ace of setbacks encountered.

APPLICATION OF SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING TECHNOLOGYTO THE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING OF RAPID SOLIDIFICATIONPROCESS TOOLINGPRATIK E. NIKAMABSTRACTRapid Solidification Process (RSP) Tooling is a patented process that produceshigh volume production tooling in prototype timing. The process was invented andperfected by Dr. Kevin McHugh at the Idaho National Engineering and EnvironmentalLaboratories (INEEL). A newly formed company, RSP Tooling, LLC licensed thistechnology for the purpose of tooling application. It is capable of producing 7”X7”X4”tools at the rate of one every three hours. Because of the speed, cost, and quality of thisnew process, new ways of thinking are required to maximize the benefits. A study of theRSP tooling process indicates that improvement greatly impacts time, from the pointwhere a 3D CAD model exists in the computer to the point where a finished die isavailable.Fabrication is currently being done using a Steriolithography (SLA) process thatis costly and time consuming. The total process now takes approximately 5 days.Production of the SLA model takes up 33% of the time. The SLA also accounts for 40%of the cost of the initial tool. The purpose of this thesis is to reduce the time and costinvolved in fabricating by applying the Subtractive Rapid Prototyping Process (SRP).iv

The Subtractive Rapid Prototyping Process (SRP) has the potential of providingthe forger a faster, low cost methodology to fabricate patterns for the manufacture of RSPtooling forging dies. This thesis will provide a powerful tool to allow fabrication of thepattern in the office, engineering laboratory or a machine shop.v

TABLE OF CONTENTSPageABSTRACT . ivLIST OF FIGURES viiiLIST OF TABLES . xCHAPTERIINTRODUCTION . .1IIRSP TOOLING .42.1History . 42.2Process .72.3Working Process of RSP Tooling . .112.4Benefits of RSP Tooling . 132.5Technology .132.6Accuracy .152.7Technical and Economical Benefits .162.8Surface Finish .172.9Limitations .17IIICONCEPT OF PROTOTYPING . . .18IVRAPID PROTOTYPING . .214.1What is Rapid Prototyping? . .214.2Why Rapid Prototyping?. . . . . .224.2.1 How does Rapid Prototyping work? . .22vi

4.3Overview of Rapid Prototyping . .224.4Rapid Prototyping Techniques . . .244.5V4.4.1Stereolithography . .254.4.2Laminated Object Manufacturing .264.4.3Selective Laser Sintering .284.4.4Fused Deposition Modeling . .30Sources of Errors in Rapid Prototyping . . . 31SUBTRACTIVE RAPID PROTOTYPING . . 335.1What is SRP? . 335.2Key Benefits . . 34VITHE MACHINE: ROLAND MDX-15 .37VIITHE MATERIAL: REN BOARD . 41VIIICOMPARISION STUDY . . . 478.1Comparison of SRP and RP . .478.1.1 Accuracy . .498.1.2 Maintenance . 508.1.3 Speed 518.2Comparison of Technologies . . . .54IXRESULTS . .64XCONCLUSION . . . 70BIBLIOGRAPHY. . 72APPENDIX (Gibbs CAM software Procedure) . 77vii

LIST OF FIGURESFigurePage1- Schematic of RSP Tooling Process . 72- RSP Tooling Production Process .83- Beta RSP Tooling Machine .104- Comparison of Material Strength at Room Temperature. 105- CAD model of the Die and RSP Tooling Die .116- Broken Ceramic Part and Prototyped Part .207- Rapid Prototyping Wheel . .248- Schematic Diagram of Stereolithography . .259- Stereolithography Product . .2610- Schematic Diagram of Laminated Object Manufacturing 2711- LOM Product . .2812- SLS Product . 2913- Schematic Diagram of Selective Laser Sintering .2914- Hand Lever Produced by FDM .3015- Schematic Diagram of Fused Deposition Modeling .3116- Modela MDX 15 . .3917- Ren Board 450 . .4318- Ren Board 5003 . . .4419- Ren Board 460 . . .4520- Different types of Ren Boards . . .4621- Part to be Study . 48viii

22- Estimated Time Required in 3D Printer . 5223- Estimated Time Required in Modela MDX 15 . .5224- Estimated Time Required in Stratasys . 5325- Parts using Additive and Subtractive Methods . 6326- Broken Ceramic Part . .6527- Preparation of Ceramic Part . 6628- Ceramic Part (Second Attempt) . 6729- RTV Made From the Die . .6830- Sprayed Tool . .6931- Finished Tool .69i

LIST OF TABLESTablePageI Process Time for RSP Tooling Process .8II RSP Process Capabilities .9III Comparisons of Machines .491

CHAPTER IIntroductionThe purpose of this thesis is to reduce the time and cost required to produce dies,by using Rapid Solidification Process (RSP) tooling process. A study of the RSP toolingitself indicates that there are two steps in the process in which improvement could greatlyimpact time from the point where a 3D CAD model of a finished die exists in thecomputer and the point where a finished die is available.Fabrication of the modelThis process is currently being done using a Steriolithography (SLA) process thatis costly and time consuming. The total RSP process now takes approximately 5 days.Production of the SLA model consumes two of those days or 33% of the time. The SLAalso accounts 40% of the cost of the initial tool, as mentioned in Table I.1

The fabrication of the ceramic targetWhile this task is the major time delay between having a solid model of a die andhaving the finish machined die, it is currently being addressed be the Idaho NationalEnvironmental Engineering Laboratory (INEEL) personnel who invented the RSPprocess. This process accounts for an additional 33% of the time but only 10% of thecost.This thesis is directed toward the first of these opportunities. The SubtractiveRapid Prototyping Process (SRP) has the potential of providing the forger a faster, lowcost methodology to fabricate patterns for the manufacture of RSP tooling forging dies.This project will provide a powerful tool to allow them to fabricate the pattern in theoffice or Engineering laboratory and reduce the time and cost of creating the model by ascompared to the stereolithography approach.SRP is the process that lets engineers and designers mill 3D prototypes quicklyand inexpensively, thereby eliminating costly outsourcing. This process is the opposite ofconventional rapid prototyping in which a 3D part is fabricated by slicing modelingmaterial to build up the 3D prototype of the part. As the thickness of the slice decrease,the number of layers that must be printed increase. This result in a more accuraterepresentation of the prototype to the CAD model at the expense of the time requiredmaking the prototype. Since many forge shops do not have a rapid prototyping capability,they must outsource this activity to service bureau to have the model made for RSPtooling application. This is costly and time consuming.The SRP process is CNC milling process. As such, removing material makes theprototype. If SLA method is successfully replaced with better technique with similar2

surface finish, then 70% time of this process can be saved. This project will explain abouthow Subtractive Rapid Prototyping using milling machine can replace SLA methodwithout affecting required finishes. To prove this, a simple part is built, which has draftsand curves. To build this part, Modela MDX-15 is used, a small desktop CNC machinethat has RPM of 3000. For this project the model material that the pattern for the RSPtooling process will use are various qualities of Ren boards, a very commonly usedmodeling material. These Ren boards are low cost and easy to cut, styling boards.The main concern while comparing results was the saving of time with lessporosity and better surface finish in the part. Three different Ren board available withdifferent hardness form highest to lowest were used. Hardness of these materials variesfrom 25 to 70. The time required for building the part, visual porosity level, and last butnot the least the surface finish on the part is compared. After comparing all three types ofmaterial, these parts are supplied to RSP Tooling, LLC where they used these parts tobuild the tool. The goal of this project to determine if the dies can be fabricated from themodel made with the SRP process are comparable to dies made by the SLA process.3

CHAPTER IIRSP TOOLING2.1 HistoryThe Rapid Solidification Process (RSP) was developed at the Idaho NationalEngineering and Environmental Laboratories (INEEL) under grants from U.S.Department of Energy (DOE). The initial patent for the process was written in 1990 andhad as its basis the invention or discovery that a liquid could be broke down into smalldroplets by use of the shearing effect of a flowing gas. There are a large number ofpossible applications of this invention.An early application was the production of low-carbon steel strip, the industry’shighest volume commodity. There are many advantages to producing strip by using RSP,with the most important from the point of view of the Department of Energy (DOE)being a significant reduction in energy accuracy, hot rolling unit operations could beeliminated, saving time, money and energy.Work on the process resulted in another patent in 1995 which introduced the useof pressurized injection of liquid into a tube, thereby improving the operational flexibilityof the device while producing a more uniform droplet size distribution in the spray. Anadditional benefit was the ability to control and increase the cooling rate of the droplets,which results in microstructure and material property improvements in the deposited4

metal.Since the grain structure of the spray deposited metal was good, as was the abilityof the spray deposited metal to replicate complex surface shapes, the idea of using theprocess to manufacture tools was developed. This resulted in two things: a new patent in1997, and the terminology of RSP Tooling. Additional patent applications have beensubmitted which refine the actual process to produce tooling.The initial issue is whether there is a need for a method to produce tools faster andfor less cost. The process is so revolutionary these issues can only be addressed byexamining different segments of industry and government operations.The Department of Energy initially started, and continues, to support research intoRSP because it is directly related to reducing costs of producing strip steel but the toolingapplications also save energy. It has been shown that the rapid solidification processcreates dies that are equal better than premium grade tool steel, but does it from the leastexpensive of the alloy cast ingots, broken tools or recycle works. Because of this all ofthe operations now preformed to create a high quality steel including Electro SlagRemelting and forgings can be eliminated.The process also eliminates the need to heat treat the material. As sprayed H13has a hardness of 56 to 58 Rockwell C, which is illustrated in Table 2, and has ability tobe age hardened at low temperatures compared to standard heat treatment methods. Thisalso means that there is no distortion and thus no need to remachine a tool after beingheat-treated. The process is also very fast and can produce the same amount of tools assix CNC machines while using the same energy as two. All of these factors save asignificant amount of energy.5

The Defense Logistics Agency of the DOD views the method as a way to quicklybring low volume forgings into production at substantially reduced cost. This result in theability to use forgings on new products gaining the advantage of less weight and higherquality while maintain a lower cost. It also helps in the production of replacementforgings when the original tooling is no longer available, reducing both cost and of moresignificant-time.In the tool and die manufacturing area the benefits are more far-reaching andeconomical in nature. A significant number of tool and die shops have gone out ofbusiness in recent years because of competition. The reasons given for buying overseasare cost and timing. The RSP Tooling process can reduce the cost and timing for acomplete moderately complex tool by 30%. This will in most cases surpass the abilitiesof the overseas competitor and allows the user to deal with local sources with all theassociated added benefits. This is of significant benefit to maintain critical skills thatcould jeopardize safely if lost.The tool user also benefits. Obviously the parts produce benefits from the lowerprice and faster timing of the purchased tooling. There is also significant evidence thatusing RSP can increase tool life of produced tools. This results from the better materialproperties obtained with the rapid solidification and also from the ability to use newmaterial that are now too costly to machine.Previous to the introduction of this process there were no rapid tooling methodsthat can produce high volume production tooling for such a variety of metals andprocesses.6

2.2ProcessFigure 1: Schematic of the RSP Tooling ProcessThe RSP Tooling production process, which is illustrated in Figure 1, starts with aCAD model of the tool that is adjusted for shrink. A pattern is produced bystereolithography (or any other method that produces a rigid model). A ceramic cast isthen poured and fired. This is placed in the RSP machine and sprayed with molten metal.The as sprayed tool is then “squared up” and fit into the die. A unique benefit of RSP isthat the properties of many tool steels (including H13) can be tailored using relativelylow temperature aging treatment, thereby eliminating distortion. H13, when agehardened, shows an increase in strength over conventionally heat-treated material, both atroom and elevated temperatures, as per Figure 4.7

Figure 2: RSP Tooling Production ProcessSLA model2 daysPreparation of Cast CeramicmodelRSP Sprayed tool2 daysFinished tool1 day2hrsTable I: Process Time for RSP Tooling ProcessMachine Cycle time3 hrsProcess Cycle time5 daysMetalsAll tool steels, copper, brass,gray iron, specialty AlloysDimensional (H13 data)Accuracy (ceramic pattern to /- 0.00025 intool)Accuracy(CADtotool /- 0.002 in./in.W/shrink)Repeatability (RTV to tool) /- 0.001 in.Metallurgical (H13 data)Density99.7%Hardness56 HRC to 62 HRC8

Ultimate Tensile Strength154 KSI to 285 KSITable II: RSP Process CapabilitiesRSP Tooling, LLC, Located in Solon, Ohio is commercializing the process andhas acquired an exclusive worldwide license for the Tooling Applications. The Betaproduction, which is machine that is shown in Figure 3, can produce a tool that is up to 7inches, by 7 inches, by 4 inches thick. Although there are many tools in this size rangegoing to a size of 15x15x10 substantially increases the revenue potential and the savingsrealized. To achieve the larger sizes substantial changes must be made to the machinedesign. Instead of spraying horizontally it would be required to spray vertically. Theremay also be the need to use multiple spray heads. Both of these concepts must be testedin laboratory conditions to assure there are no intrinsic difficulties before actuallybuilding the larger machine.Figure 3: The Beta RSP Tooling Machine9

Figure 4: Comparison of Material Strength at Room TemperatureAnd at 550ºC (1022ºF)Figure 5: CAD Model of the Die and RSP Tooling DieThe finished CAD model of the die is then modeled in Solid Works. Figure 5shows the finished model of the die and the die that was fabricated by the Rapid10

Solidification Process.2.3 Working Process of RSP ToolingRSP tooling is a spray forming technology tailored for producing molds and dies.The approach combines rapid solidification processing as net shape materials processingin a single step. The concept involves converting a mold design described by CAD file toa tooling master using a suitable Rapid prototyping technology such as Steriolithography.This is followed by spray forming a thick deposit of tool steel on the pattern to capturethe desired shape, surface texture and detail. The resultant metal block is cooled to roomtemperature, separated from the pattern and squared up to fit a standard holding block.The turn around time is approximately five days, which is significantly less thantraditional tooling.This process involves spraying layers of molten metal onto a 3-D pattern andbuilding up the layers into full-sized die. This Rapid Solidification Process circumventsthe majority of the fabrication steps in conventional methods. A high velocity jet ofnitrogen sprays tiny droplets of molten metal onto ceramic pattern, depending on thealloy used. The surface area of the droplets is so great compared to their volume, thedroplets cool somewhere between 100 to 100,000 degrees per second. Such a fast coolingrate results in unusual beneficial characteristics of the alloy. It produces a very uniformmicrostructure and allows the properties of many die steels to be tailored using 'artificialaging' instead of conventional heat treatment. Industry has demonstrated that artificialaging benefits many die steels. RSP dies last about 20% longer than conventional,machined dies.Rapid solidification results in a combination of liquid, solid and “slushy” droplets11

coating the tool pattern. The slushiness allows the droplets to stick together as they hit thepattern, and may contribute to the level of detail RSP can achieve. The process does notavoid all post-fabrication steps, however. After depositing the spray on the mold or die,the pattern is removed; the deposit is trimmed to fit a standard mold base, and is heattreated, if necessary. In prototype development, initial dies can be designed, created andtested within a few days. Changes to the die can be incorporated quickly andinexpensively. When the design is satisfactory, the prototype can be directly used forproduction without additional steps.2.4 Benefits of RSP ToolingRSP Tooling can produce a tool or insert within five days after the solid modelhas been defined in the computer. The advantages of this process are: The sprayed insert cavity requires little or no finishing machining, polishing, orengraving. Any commonly used tooling alloy can be used, and special steel materials can betested as well. Timing to a production ready insert is no longer than most prototype processesand significantly less than other production ready processes. Tools made of H13 do not require heat treat .As Sprayed they are at Rockwell C56 and can be age hardened to Rockwell C 62.12

Tools made of H13 appear to have a 25% increase in life expectancy overstandard machine tools from high grade forged H13. The process is extremely repeatable and the cost for additional inserts is 50% ofthe cost of the initial one making it an ideal process for multi-cavity dies and replacementinserts because there is no need to repeat the Rapid Prototyping step.It is believed that scrap tools can be melted and reused without loss of materialproperties.2.5 TechnologyRSP Tooling is a spray forming technology that was developed by Dr. KevinMcHugh at INEEL for producing molds and dies. The general concept involvesconverting a die design described by a CAD file to tooling master using a suitable rapidprototyping technology. A pattern transfer is made to a castable ceramic, typicallyalumina or fused silica. Spray forming a thick deposit of tool steel on the ceramic patternto capture the desired shape, surface texture, and detail follows this. The deposit is builtup to the desired thickness at a rate of about 500-lb/hr. Thus, the spray time for a 7”X 7”X 4” thick insert is only 8 minutes. The resultant metal block is cooled to roomtemperature and separated from the pattern. Typically, the deposit’s exterior walls aremachined using a wire EDM.The turn round time for cavity or insert is unaffected by complexity. From receiptof a CAD solid model to shipment of the tool is about 5 days. Molds and dies produced inthis way have been used for prototype and production runs in plastic injection molding,die casting, and forging process.Generation of the physical model is straightforward. A number of rapid13

prototyping approaches are available commercially to accomplish this, but they differwidely in terms of cost, accuracy, and surface finish.Ceramic patterns are made by slip casting or freeze casting ceramic slurry,typically made of alumina or fused silica on to the tool master. This involves mixing aceramic powder with a liquid activator or binder, pouring the mixture into a mold,allowing it to set up, firing the ceramic in a furnace. Many ceramic formulations havebeen and are being evaluated for suitability in the process. Ease of casting, material cost,surface roughness, strength, thermal shock resistance, maximum use temperature,flatness, and dimensional accuracy are assessed. With the right equipment andprocedures, very accurate and reproducible ceramics are easily made.The spray-forming step is at the heart of the RSP Tooling process. Spray forminginvolves atomizing i.e. breaking up a molten metal stream into small droplets, using ahigh velocity gas jet. Aerodynamic forces overcome surface tension forces producing anarray of droplet sizes that are entrained by the jet and deposited onto the pattern.As the droplets traverse the distance separating the atomizer and ceramic toolpattern, they cool at very high rates that vary depending on size. As a result, acombination of liquid, solid, and droplets impact the ceramic, and weld together to form acoherent deposit.The high cooling rate of the deposit greatly impedes atomic diffusion, sosegregation is very limited to cast metal. It also minimizes the erosive interaction of themetal and ceramic tool pattern, allowing the deposited metal to accurately capture thesurface details of the ceramic that would not be possible if the metal was cast onto theceramic.14

2.6 AccuracyDimensional accuracy and repeatability of all processing steps have beenanalyzed by Colorado State University personnel and industry partners using coordinatemeasuring machines (CMM). This has helped to identify suitable materials andprocessing conditions. Several conclusions have been drawn from the study.Dies made from the same master but different ceramic patterns were essentiallyidentical which is of major importance in multiple cavity dies or replacement inserts.Most of the shrinkage in the ceramic comes from casting and firing the ceramic.Some ceramic formulations nearly eliminate the shrinkage. The shrinkage is consistentand reproducible which means that a computer program to predict shrink by feature willimprove the process accuracy. The overall conclusion of the dimensional accuracy studyis that the accuracy of molds made by the RSP Tooling method is comparable to theconventional practice of machining, polishing, and heat-treating.2.7 Technical and Economical BenefitsThe main benefits of RSP Tooling involve cost and turnaround time reductionswithout sacrificing quality and accuracy. When the atomized spray covers the surface ofceramic tool pattern, it replicates the features very accurately, regardless of thecomplexity. By doing so, it eliminates many steps in normal die-making practices such asmilling, EDM, and polishing.The cost for RSP tool is also constant except for the solid model cost and thematerial used. The master pattern varies depending on the method used, the size and thematerial. The cost of the second cavity does not have the cost of SLA since only one SLAis required.15

2.8 Surface FinishThe surface finish that can be achieved by using RSP system is dependent on theceramic and the initial model. The spray system replicates the ceramic with extremeaccuracy and can pick up details as small as 0.0001”. Using the standard process now inuse a surface finish of 45 micro inches can be achieved.2.9 LimitationsThere are limitations to the size of molds and dies that can be produced withcurrent RSP Tooling equipment. Currently RSP Tooling, LLC can produce dies of thesize of 7” X 7” X 4”. However, the process has no inherent size limitation, and thecompany is planning machines with lager capacity.The second limitation is the aspect ratio for standing features of the die. Cavityfeatures on the mold surface do not present problems. However, boss features on themold surface do if their aspect ratio exceeds about 4:1, i.e., if the feature protruding fromthe surface of the die is more than 4 times as tall as it is wide. This is because, whenspraying molten metal down into a

SRP device such as a desk top CNC milling machine. For this project a Roland MDX 15 machine was used; however, any SRP device could have been used. This machine cost 2995 which is well below the cost of a steriolithography machine. For a modeling material three different Ren Boards (Cured Polyurethane) were used; Ren Shape 450,

Related Documents:

Rapid Prototyping 101 1 Rapid Prototyping 101 Master Basic Prototyping Concepts. 3330 N. State Road North Vernon N 4265 Telephone: (812) 346-5188 Fax: (812) 346-35 mail:fiwesalesdecaturmold.com Rapid Prototyping 101 1 CLASS 105 MOLD: Prototypes Cycles: Not exceeding 500

Rapid Prototyping Technology 3-D printing is a subset of rapid prototyping that is affordable, quick, size constrained, and safe to use in an office environment. As compared with rapid prototyping machines that can cost as much as 500,000, a 3 -D printer can be attained for about 50,000. Typical part build times for

that have integrated the Roland MDX milling machine into their rapid prototyping and manufacturing process have realized the benefits of bringing the subtractive technology in8house. The MDX takes all of the key . Over the last 20 years, subtractive technologies have

Thank you for your interest in the CY8CKIT-147 PSoC 4100PS Prototyping Kit. The PSoC 4100PS prototyping kit is designed as an easy-to-use and inexpensive prototyping platform. The PSoC4100PS Prototyping Kit supports the PSoC 4100PS device family, delivering a complete system solution for a wide range of embedded applications at a very low cost.

roland MDX Product Comparison 2 TeChNoloGy BRief SuBTrACTive rAPiD ProToTyPing Model Price Build size Materials Options Notes MDX-15 3,145 6" x 4" x 2.4" Foams, plastics, wood Includes probe scanner for 3D scanning MDX-20 4,696 8" x 6" x 2.4" Foams, plastics, wood Includes probe scanner for 3D scanning MDX-40A 7,995 12" x 12" x 4.1 with 4th .

Tutorial: Rapid Prototyping Technologies 1. Introduction Rapid prototyping (RP) is a new manufacturing technique that allows for fast fabrication of computer models designed with three-dimension (3D) computer aided design (CAD) software. RP is used in a wide variety of industries, from shoe to car manufacturers.

Rapid Prototyping Rapid Prototyping Ducky, Derek (UCB EECS) Mechatronics Design Lab February 19, 2020 (Week 5)4/10. Rapid Prototyping 3d printing FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) Process I Builds a model from the bottom up, layer-by-layer . Parametric solid modelin

RAPID PROTOTYPING Charan and A. Bagchi . T. Renault and A.A. Ogale Department ofChemical Engineering Intelligent Design and Rapid Prototyping Laboratory Center for Advanced Manufacturing Clemson University Clemson, SC 29634 . The fabrication of composite