Resilient Pigeon Tabletop Exercise - FEMA

2y ago
24 Views
3 Downloads
1,001.94 KB
32 Pages
Last View : 12d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Duke Fulford
Transcription

Resilient Pigeon:Continuity, Devolution, and Reconstitution Table Top ExerciseFebruary 16th, 20161

Welcome and OverviewEmma PoonExercise DirectorFEMA National Continuity Programs2

Exercise Overview Exercise ScopeThis exercise is a tabletop exercise, planned for 6 hours at the EOC. Exercise play islimited to senior leaders and Devolution partners. Mission Areas Continuity of Operations Recovery3

Objectives and Core Capabilities Validate the ability of Devolution partners to continue essentialfunctions during an active shooter event within the minimal acceptableperiod for essential function disruption or within 12 hours, whichevertime period is shorter. Operational Coordination During this tabletop exercise, identify the steps necessary and anyplanning gaps encountered for the agency/office to reconstitute andrecover after an active shooter event. Planning4

Participant Roles and Responsibilities Players: Respond to the situation presented based on current plans,policies, and procedures. Observers: Support players in developing responses, but do notparticipate in moderated discussion. Facilitators: Provide situation updates and moderate discussions. Evaluators: Observe and document player discussions.5

Exercise Structure This exercise will be a facilitated table top discussion exercise.Players will participate in the following modules: Module 1: The Trigger Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery Each module begins with an update that summarizes key eventsoccurring within that time period. After the updates, participantsreview the situation and engage in group discussions of: Continuity of Operations Devolution Reconstitution6

Exercise Guidelines This is an open, low-stress, no-fault environment. Varying viewpoints,even disagreements, are expected. Respond to the scenario using your knowledge of current plans andcapabilities (i.e., you may only use existing assets) and insightsderived from your training. Decisions are not precedent setting and may not reflect yourorganization’s final position on a given issue. This exercise is anopportunity to discuss and present multiple options and possiblesolutions. Issue identification is not as valuable as suggestions andrecommended actions that could improve continuity of operations,devolution and reconstitution efforts. Problem-solving efforts shouldbe the focus.7

Assumptions and Artificialities The exercise is conducted in a no-fault learning environment where incapabilities, plans, systems, and processes will be evaluated. The exercise scenario is plausible, and events occur as they arepresented. All players receive information at the same time.8

Exercise ScheduleTimeActivityFebruary 16, 20160830Registration0900Welcome and Opening Remarks0930Module 1: Briefing, Discussion, and Brief-Back1100Lunch1200Module 2: Briefing, Discussion, and Brief-Back1330Hot Wash1400Closing Comments9

Concepts to Consider On September 16th, 2013 an active shooter incident occurred at theNavy Yard in Washington DC “There was a feeling of powerlessness. I’m in command of 60,000people, and I can do nothing. I am locked down with my phone.” –Vice Admiral William Hilarides, Naval Sea Systems Command10

Concepts to Consider Continuity Areas ofInterest11

Module 1: The Trigger12

Module 1: The Trigger February 16th, 2016: 10:00 AM An employee of your agency/office enters into your building and getsthrough security, stopping at the elevator bay, and pulls out a weapon.The security guards are shot immediately as are any people exitingthe elevators at this time. Those that are in the lobby run outside to call 911. The shooter proceeds into the elevators and exits onto youragency/office’s floor and proceeds to shoot anyone within sight. Many are injured and several are dead.13

Module 1: The Trigger14

Module 1: The Trigger February 16th, 2016: 10:15 AM People are sheltering in place. First responders have arrived and thepolice are entering your building to subdue the shooter. Due to conflicting reports, the police are uncertain about the number ofshooters in the building. The media has arrived and have begin to report on the incidentnationally.15

Module 1: The Trigger16

Module 1: The Trigger February 16th, 2016: 4:00 PM The chaos of the day is starting to subside. The police haveapprehended the shooter and the shelter in place order is finally lifted. Personnel are allowed to go home, however, some do not have theirbelongings. The police have declared your building a crime scene and no one willbe allowed back inside for at least 2 weeks.17

Module 1: Key Issues The continuation of your agency/office’s essential functions. Devolving your agency/office’s essential functions. Continuity of operations for your agency/office during the incident.18

Module 1: Discussion Discussion: 1 hour Brief-Back: 15 minutes19

Concepts to Consider Real World Reconstitution It took 17 months after the Navy Yard shooting for personnel to reoccupy Building197 The Navy completed a 6.4 million renovation of the building During the renovation, personnel were relocated to a former Coast Guard facility atBuzzard Point20

Concepts to Consider Real World Reconstitution Many personnel refuse to go back to Building 197 and the Navy hasaccommodated their wishes by transferring them to other jobs in different buildings Personnel returned on a staggered weekly move-in schedule over the course ofnine weeks21

Concepts to Consider Real World Reconstitution “The Navy has done a wonderful job of re-creating that space so that it won’t behaunted by the memories and by the unresolved emotions of people who werethere that day. They have done a herculean effort at reclaiming and rededicatingthat space. There may be people so traumatized they don’t feel comfortable aboutbeing back in there. Some will have to figure out ways to expunge their fear. Butthe institution has done as much as they can to make the building a safe place.” –Commander Paul Anderson, Navy Chaplain22

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery23

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery February 17th, 2016: 7:00 AM It’s the day after the event. 40% of your personnel are still beingtreated at medical facilities for various injuries or emotional issues. 10% of your personnel have lost their lives during the shooting. Your agency/office only has 50% of the workforce available to work. However, only half of those personnel are capable of working fromhome or alternate work locations.24

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery25

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery February 29th, 2016: 7:00 AM It is two weeks after the event. The building is no longer a crimescene, however it is not suitable for occupation due to the damagesustained during the shooting. Personnel are allowed to go back toretrieve personal items left behind during the shooting. It is determined that it will take over a year for the building to berepaired and renovated for reoccupation. A significant portion of your personnel have opted to retire, seek otheremployment, or have taken extended leave due to the shooting. Youhave approximately 60% of the workforce you did prior to the event.26

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery27

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery July 17th, 2017: 7:00 AM It is now approximately a year and a half later. The building has notbeen repaired and is now ready for reoccupation. You are now close to have 100% of the workforce that you did prior tothe event.28

Module 2: Reconstitution and Recovery Expectations for personnel immediately after the shooting and thesustainability of your agency/office’s essential functions. The threshold for your agency/office to reassume the functions beingperformed by your Devolution partners. What your agency/office will do during the time your building isunavailable. The Reconstitution process.29

Hot Wash Strengths Areas for Improvement30

Closing Comments31

Questions?Emma PoonContinuity SpecialistU.S. Department of Homeland SecurityFederal Emergency Management AgencyNational Continuity ProgramsEmail: emma.poon@fema.dhs.gov32

Exercise Overview Exercise Scope. This exercise is a tabletop exercise, planned for 6 hours at the EOC. Exercise play is limited to senior leaders and Devolution partners. Mission Areas Continuity of Operations Recovery. 3

Related Documents:

INDEX PRESENTATION 5 THE THUMB 7 MECHANICAL EXERCISES 8 SECTION 1 THUMB Exercise 1 12 Exercise 2 13 Exercise 3 - 4 14 Exercise 5 15 Estudio 1 16 SECTION 2 THUMB WITH JUMPS Exercise 6 17 Exercise 7 - 8 18 Exercise 9 19 Exercise 10 20 Exercise 11 - 12 21 Estudio 6 22 SECTION 3 GOLPE Exercise 13 23 Exercise 14 24 Exercise 15 25 Exercise 16 - 17 26 Exercise 18 27 .

3 Tabletop Exercise Operators provided details about their vehicle and operations via a questionnaire prior to the Tabletop. This data was incorporated into the Tabletop #2 data collection materials to maximize time during the exercise. The Tabletop discussions were

Phase III: Tabletop Exercise Using the IED scenario, local health departments (LHDs) and local Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) entities will facilitate a tabletop exercise for partner agencies and organizations. The tabletop exercise will foc

Chapter 1 Exercise Solutions Exercise 1.1 Exercise 1.2 Exercise 1.3 Exercise 1.4 Exercise 1.5 Exercise 1.6 Exercise 1.7 Exercise 1.8 Exercise 1.9 Exercise 1.10 Exercise 1.11 Exercise 1.12 Fawwaz T. Ulaby and Umberto Ravaioli, Fundamentals of Applied Electromagnetics c 2019 Prentice Hall

Leadership Tabletop Exercise . Cybersecurity Overview and Resource Guide . Page 3 . o. Regional Tabletop Exercises (RTTX): The RTTXs are one- day events that include a tabletop exercise designed to add

125 gse mdl. 350 ss tabletop digital scale 126 ohaus defender 3000 tabletop digital scale 127 ohaus defender 3000 tabletop digital scale 128 ohaus defender 3000 tabletop digital scale 129 gse mdl. 350 ss tabletop digital scale full payment in the form of cash, cashier's check or wire transfer is due by 12:00pm wednesday, november 5, 2014.

FEMA P-320 and P-361 guidelines, FEMA’s term "safe room" can only be applied to protective spaces meeting the FEMA criteria. If a space is designed only to the ICC-500 Standard then FEMA requires it be called a “shelter”. Therefore: FEMA does not recognized NSSA/ICC 500 compliant safe rooms as meeting FEMA 361. They

a result of poor understanding of human factors. Patient deaths have occurred as a result. Example: unprotected electrodes n Problems: Device use errors - improper hook ups, improper device settings n Solutions: “Ergonomic or Human factors engineering - See “Do it by Design” and AAMI Human Factors Engineering Guidelines.