WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX 1 ARTICLE II 2

3y ago
35 Views
2 Downloads
264.75 KB
24 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Casen Newsome
Transcription

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Article II (Jurisprudence)1ARTICLE II. 21.1Text of Article II . 21.2Text of note ad Article II. 31.3Understanding on Interpretation of Article II.1(b) of the GATT 1994 . 41.4Article II:1: Interpretation of tariff concessions . 51.4.1General. 51.4.2Applicable interpretative rules . 61.4.3Ordinary meaning and factual context . 61.4.4Context for tariff concessions including Harmonized System . 71.4.5Subsequent practice . 81.4.6Circumstances of conclusion . 81.4.7Relevance of "legitimate expectations" . 81.5Article II:1(a) . 91.5.1"treatment no less favourable" . 91.5.2"commerce". 91.5.3Article XXVIII modifications prior to certification . 91.6Article II:1(b) . 91.6.1"upon their importation" . 91.6.2Duties or charges under Article II:1(b) .101.6.3"subject to the terms, conditions or qualifications set forth in that Schedule" .101.6.4"ordinary customs duties" .121.6.5"in excess of".131.6.6"other duties or charges" (ODCs) .151.6.6.1General .151.6.6.2Import surcharges .161.6.6.3Foreign exchange fees .161.6.6.4 Recording of "other duties and charges" pursuant to the Understanding onArticle II.1(b).171.6.7Relationship between paragraphs 1(b) and 2(a) .171.6.8Demonstration of trade effects .171.6.9Balancing/offsetting .181.7Article II:2 .181.7.1Closed list .181.7.2Article II:2(a) .181.7.3Article II:2(b) .191.8Article II:5 .201.9Article II:7 .201.10Relationship with other GATT provisions .201.10.1General .201.10.2Article III.201

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Article II (Jurisprudence)1.10.3Article XIII.211.10.4Article XVII .221.10.5Article XX .221.10.6Article XXVIII.221.11Relationship with other WTO agreements.221.11.1Agreement on Agriculture.221.11.2Licensing Agreement .231.121.12.1Tariff Initiatives in the WTO.23Minis terial Declaration on Trade in Information Technology Products .231 ARTICLE II1.1 Text of Article IIArticle IISchedules of Concessions1. (a)Each contracting party shall accord to the commerce of the other contractingparties treatment no less favourable than that provided for in the appropriate Part of theappropriate Schedule annexed to this Agreement.(b)The products described in Part I of the Schedule relating to any contractingparty, which are the products of territories of other contracting parties, shall, on theirimportation into the territory to which the Schedule relates, and subject to the terms,conditions or qualifications set forth in that Schedule, be exempt from ordinary customsduties in excess of those set forth and provided therein.Such products shall also beexempt from all other duties or charge s of any kind imposed on or in connection with theimportation in excess of those imposed on the date of this Agreement or those directly andmandatorily required to be imposed thereafter by legislation in force in the importingterritory on that date.(c)The products described in Part II of the Schedule relating to any contractingparty which are the products of territories entitled under Article I to receive preferentialtreatment upon importation into the territory to which the Schedule relates shall , on theirimportation into such territory, and subject to the terms, conditions or qualifications setforth in that Schedule, be exempt from ordinary customs d uties in excess of those setforth and provided for in Part II of that Schedule. Such products shall also be exemptfrom all other duties or charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with importationin excess of those imposed on the date of this Agreement or those directly or mandatorilyrequired to be imposed thereafter by legislation in for ce in the importing territory on thatdate. Nothing in this Article shall prevent any contracting party from maintaining itsrequirements existing on the date of this Agreement as to the eligibility of goods for entryat preferential rates of duty.2. Nothing in this Article shall prevent any contracting party from imposing at any timeon the importation of any product:(a)a charge equivalent to an internal tax imposed consistently with theprovisions of paragraph 2 of Article III* in respect of the like domesticproduct or in respect of an article from which the imported product hasbeen manufactured or produced in whole or in part;(b)any anti-dumping or countervailing duty applied consistently with theprovisions of Article VI;*2

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Article II (Jurisprudence)(c)fees or other charges commensurate with the cost of services rendered.3. No contracting party shall alter its method of determining dutiable value or ofconverting currencies so as to impair the value of any of the concessions provided for inthe appropriate Schedule annexed to this Agreement.4. If any contracting party establishes, maintains or authorizes, formally or in effect, amonopoly of the importation of any product described in the appropriate Schedule annexedto this Agreement, such monopoly shall not, except as provided for in that Schedule or asotherwise agreed between the parties which initially negotiated the concession, operate soas to afford protection on the average in excess of the amount of protection provided for inthat Schedule. The provisions of this paragraph shall not limit the use by contractingparties of any form of assistance to domestic producers permitted by other provisions ofthis Agreement.*5. If any contracting party considers that a product is not receiving from anothercontracting party the treatment which the first contracting party believes to have beencontemplated by a concession provided for in the appropriate Schedule annex ed to thisAgreement, it shall bring the matter directly to the attention of the other contracti ng party.If the latter agrees that the treatment contemplated was that claimed by the firstcontracting party, but declares that such treatment cannot be acco rded because a court orother proper authority has ruled to the effect that the product involved cannot be classifiedunder the tariff laws of such contracting party so as to permit the treatment contemplatedin this Agreement, the two contracting parties, together with any other contracting partiessubstantially interested, shall enter promptly into further negotiations with a view to acompensatory adjustment of the matter.6. (a)The specific duties and charges included in the Schedules relating to con tractingparties members of the International Monetary Fund, and margins of preference in specif icduties and charges maintained by such contracting parties, are expressed in theappropriate currency at the par value accepted or provisionally recognized by the Fund atthe date of this Agreement. Accordingly, in case this par value is reduced consistently withthe Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund by more than twenty percentum, such specific duties and charges and margins of preferen ce may be adjusted totake account of such reduction; provided that the CONTRACTING PARTIES (i.e., thecontracting parties acting jointly as provided for in Article XXV) concur that suchadjustments will not impair the value of the concessions provided fo r in the appropriateSchedule or elsewhere in this Agreement, due account being taken of all fac tors which mayinfluence the need for, or urgency of, such adjustments.(b)Similar provisions shall apply to any contracting party not a member of theFund, as from the date on which such contracting party becomes a member of the Fund orenters into a special exchange agreement in pursuance of Article XV.7. The Schedules annexed to this Agreement are hereby made an integral part of Part Iof this Agreement.1.2 Text of note ad Article IIAd Article IIParagraph 2 (a)The cross-reference, in paragraph 2 (a) of Article II, to paragraph 2 of Article III s ha llonly apply after Article III has been modified by the entry into force of the amendmentprovided for in the Protocol Modifying Part II and Article XXVI of the General Agreement onTariffs and Trade, dated September 14, 1948. 1(footnote original)1This Protocol entered into force on 14 December 1948.3

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Article II (Jurisprudence)Paragraph 2 (b)See the note relating to paragraph 1 of Article I.Paragraph 4Except where otherwise specifically agreed between the contrac ting parties whichinitially negotiated the concession, the provisions of this paragraph will be applied in thelight of the provisions of Article 31 of the Havana Charter.1.3 Understanding on Interpretation of Article II.1(b) of the GATT 1994Members hereby agree as follows:1. In order to ensure transparency of the legal rights and obligations deriving fromparagraph 1(b) of Article II, the nature and level of any "other duties or charges" levied o nbound tariff items, as referred to in that provision, s hall be recorded in the Schedules ofconcessions annexed to GATT 1994 against the tariff item to which they apply. It isunderstood that such recording does not change the legal character of "other duties orcharges".2. The date as of which "other duties or charges" are bound, for the purposes ofArticle II, shall be 15 April 1994. "Other duties or charges" shall therefore be recorded inthe Schedules at the levels applying on this date. At each subsequent renegotiation of aconcession or negotiation of a new concession the applicable date for the tariff item inquestion shall become the date of the incorporation of the new concession in theappropriate Schedule. However, the date of the instrument by which a concession on anyparticular tariff item was first incorporated into GATT 1947 or GATT 1994 shall alsocontinue to be recorded in column 6 of the Loose -Leaf Schedules.3."Other duties or charges" shall be recorded in respect of all tariff bindings.4. Where a tariff item has previously been the subject of a concession, the level of "otherduties or charges" recorded in the appropriate Schedule shall not be higher than the levelobtaining at the time of the first incorporation of the concession in that Schedule. It willbe open to any Member to challenge the existence of an "other duty or charge", on theground that no such "other duty or charge" existed at the time of the original binding ofthe item in question, as well as the consistency of the recorded level of any "other duty orcharge" with the previously bound level, for a period of three years after the date of entryinto force of the WTO Agreement or three years after the date of deposit with the DirectorGeneral of the WTO of the instrument incorporating the Schedule in question intoGATT 1994, if that is a later date.5. The recording of "other duties or charges" in the Schedules is without prejudice totheir consistency with rights and obligations under GATT 1994 other than those affected byparagraph 4. All Members retain the right to challenge, at any time, the consistency ofany "other duty or charge" with such obligations.6. For the purposes of this Understanding, the provisions of A rticles XXII and XXIII ofGATT 1994 as elaborated and applied by the Dispute Settlement Understa nding shallapply.7. "Other duties or charges" omitted from a Schedule at the time of deposit of theinstrument incorporating the Schedule in question into GA TT 1994 with, until the date ofentry into force of the WTO Agreement, the Director -General to the CONTRACTINGPARTIES to GATT 1947 or, thereafter, with the Director -General of the WTO, shall notsubsequently be added to it and any "other duty or charge" r ecorded at a level lower thanthat prevailing on the applicable date shall not be restored to th at level unless suchadditions or changes are made within six months of the date of deposit of the instrument.4

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Article II (Jurisprudence)8. The decision in paragraph 2 regarding the da te applicable to each concession for thepurposes of paragraph 1(b) of Article II of GATT 1994 supersedes the decision regardingthe applicable date taken on 26 March 1980 (BISD 27S/24).1.4 Article II:1: Interpretation of tariff concessions1.4.1 General1.The Panel in EC – Chicken Cuts had to decide whether the tariff treatment of frozenboneless salted chicken cuts imported into the European Communities was inconsistent with ArticleII:1(a) and Article II:1(b), as had been alleged by Brazil and Thailand. The Panel set out a threestep test for their analysis of this issue:"[W]e will need to ascertain: (a) the treatment accorded to the products at issueunder the EC Schedule; (b) the treatment accorded to the products at issue under themeasures at issue; and (c) whether the measures at issue result in less favourabletreatment of the products at issue than that provided for in the EC Schedule and,more particularly, whether those measures result in the imposition of duties andconditions on the products at issue in excess of those provided for in the ECSchedule."12.The Panel found that the EC measures at issue had the effect of classifying frozen bonelesschicken cuts that had been impregnated with salt, with a salt content of 1.2% – 3% (the productsat issue), under the concession contained in heading 02.07 of the EC Schedule, which relates interalia to "frozen" chicken. The Panel concluded that those measures were in violation of ArticleII:1(a) and II:1(b) of the GATT 1994 because (based on its interpretation o f the EC Schedule) theproducts at issue were covered by the concession in heading 02.10 of that Schedule, but the ECmeasures resulted in imposition of customs duties on the chicken cuts in question in excess of thebound duty rate for heading 02.10."The Panel recalls that we stated that, if we were to conclude that the products atissue are covered by the concession contained in heading 02.10 of the EC Schedule,there is no question that the treatment accorded to those products under themeasures at issue is less favourable than that provided for in the EC Schedulebecause undisputed pricing data indicates that the duty levied on the products at issuecan and has exceeded 15.4% ad valorem, being the bound duty rate for productscovered by heading 02.10.It is the Panel's view that the products at issue are covered by the concessioncontained in heading 02.10 of the EC Schedule. Therefore, such products are entitledto treatment provided for by that concession. Since the products at issue are notbeing accorded such treatment, the European Communities is in violation of ArticleII:1(a) and Article II:1(b) of the GATT 1994.In reaching this conclusion, the Panel recalls that a fundamental object and purpose o fthe WTO Agreement and the GATT 1994 is that the security and predictability ofreciprocal and mutually advantageous arrangements must be pres erved. In thePanel's view, a Member's unilateral intention regarding the meaning to be ascribed toa concession that Member has made in the context of WTO mul tilateral tradenegotiations cannot prevail over the common intentions of all WTO Members asdetermined through an analysis undertaken pursuant to Articles 31 and 32 of theVienna Convention."2Panel Report, EC – Chicken Cuts, para. 7.65; followed by Panel Report, EC – IT Products, para. 7.100.Panel Report, EC – Chicken Cuts, paras. 7.425-7.427. The Panel arrived at this conclusion byinterpreting tariff heading 02.10 of the EC Schedule using the customary rules of treaty interpretation codifiedin Articles 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The Appellate Body reversed the Panel'sinterpretation and application of the concept of "subsequent practice" under Article 31(3)(b) of the ViennaConvention, but did not alter the Panel's ultimate conclusion that the European Communities' measures wereWTO-inconsistent.125

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEXGATT 1994 – Artic

7. The Schedules annexed to this Agreement are hereby made an integral part of Part I of this Agreement. 1.2 Text of note ad Article II Ad Article II Paragraph 2 (a) The cross-reference, in paragraph 2 (a) of Article II, to paragraph 2 of Article III shall only apply after Article III has been modified by the entry into force of the amendment

Related Documents:

The WTO and Sustainable Development BY GARY P.SAMPSON With a Foreword by WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy The WTO and Sustainable Development Gary P. Sampson “The WTO simply cannot ignore the need to promote and preserve the environment. The priority must be to re-balance the inte

Amendments to the Louisiana Constitution of 1974 Article I Article II Article III Article IV Article V Article VI Article VII Article VIII Article IX Article X Article XI Article XII Article XIII Article XIV Article I: Declaration of Rights Election Ballot # Author Bill/Act # Amendment Sec. Votes for % For Votes Against %

WTO ANALYTICAL INDEX 1 ARTICLE 5 5 - Global trade . The .". .

Abbreviations xxix PC Carli price index PCSWD Carruthers, Sellwood, Ward, and Dalén price index PD Dutot price index PDR Drobisch index PF Fisher price index PGL Geometric Laspeyres price index PGP Geometric Paasche price index PH Harmonic average of price relatives PIT Implicit Törnqvist price index PJ Jevons price index PJW Geometric Laspeyres price index (weighted Jevons index)

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)/WTO have been reflected in various TPA legislation since 1974. Congress also has oversight of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies that participate in WTO meetings and enforce WTO commitments. The WTO is a 164-member internationa

Dec 19, 2019 · GATT/WTO trade negotiations (rounds); as well as their actions with respect to the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism (DSM). GATT/WTO Trade Rounds. The GATT/WTO world trading system did not emerge overnight. It was constructed through a

Gold-coloured paper clip with the WTO logo. Price: 10 CHF Price: 5 CHF Keyring Metal keyring with the engraved WTO logo. Microfiber Cleaning Cloth 15 x 15 cm decorative cloth removes light grease and finger arks from glasses and lenses. Price: 5 CHF Pin Enamel pin with WTO logo on white background. Pr

academic writing setting and culture in their respective learning establishments do not prepare them for the conventions of English writing. Abbas (2011) investigated metadiscourse terms and phrases to understand the socio-cultural variances of Arabic and English-speaking researchers. Abbas analysed seventy discussions of linguistic academic journals composed by native speakers of Arabic as .