LIVING BIRD

3y ago
33 Views
2 Downloads
6.21 MB
25 Pages
Last View : 21d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Allyson Cromer
Transcription

LIVING BIRDCornell Lab of OrnithologySUMMER 2010Living Bird / Summer 2010 1

CRYSTAL CLEAR, RUGGED,ERGONOMICSLC 42 HD. A CLASSIC PERFECTEDThe fluoride containing HD lenses guarantee bright, high contrastimages with maximum color fidelity. The SLC 42 HD alsooffers enhanced coating technology, a large field of view anda new focusing mechanism.LIVING BIRDSummer 2010 Volume 29 / Number 3Features18Albatross Island by Cliff BeittelIn the vast North Pacific, halfway between San Franciscoand Japan, Midway Atoll boasts the largest albatross colonyin the world.2834Flamingos of the Altiplanoby Marita Davison and Jennifer MoslemiOn a high, lonely plateau in the Andes, a little-knownpopulation of volcano flamingos struggles to survive in achanging world.Exploring the Falkland Islands by Gary KramerCharles Darwin dropped in on these remote islands in 1833,during his epic voyage of discovery. Now, more than 175 yearslater, they are still a spectacular place to watch wildlife.Columns & DepartmentsNEW FOCUSING MECHANISMfor extremely quick and preciseadjustment18Cover: A young Laysan Albatross on Midway Atoll. See article onpage 18. Photograph by Cliff Beittel.Back cover: A Magellanic Penguin on the Falkland Islands. See articleon page 34. Photograph by Gary Kramer.4Letters8Around the Lab10ScienceScope12Spotlight42Books for Birdersby Stephen J. Bodio46A Naturalist’sNotebookby John Schmittby David S. WilcoveHIGH-PERFORMANCE HD OPTICSfor maximum color fidelity, perfectcontrast and impressive transmissionCOMPACT and RUGGEDthanks to an ergonomically optimized designand lightweight magnesium housingSEE THE UNSEENWWW.SWAROVSKIOPTIK.COMSWAROVSKI OPTIK NORTH AMERICA LTD2 Slater Road, Cranston, RI 02920Tel. 800-426-3089,Fax/401-734-5888Living BirdSummer 2010info@swarovskioptik.us212Living Bird / Summer 2010 3

LIVING BIRDSummer 2010LettersVolume 29 / Number 3Editorial StaffEditor-in-Chief:Design Director:Assistant Editor:Technical Editors:Science Editor:Staff Writer:Publications Assistant:Contributing Editors:Advertising Manager:Tim GallagherKat DaltonMiyoko ChuKevin J. McGowanKenneth V. RosenbergHugh PowellPat LeonardJennifer SmithStephen J. BodioJack ConnorPete DunneMel WhiteDavid S. WilcoveSusanna LawsonAdministrative StaffLouis Agassiz Fuertes DirectorJohn W. FitzpatrickSenior Director, Development & PhilanthropySean ScanlonDirector, Individual GivingScott SutcliffeDirector, Program Development & EvaluationRichard E. Bonney, Jr.Director, MultimediaJohn BowmanDirector, CommunicationsMiyoko ChuDirector, Bioacoustics Research ProgramChristopher W. ClarkDirector, Bird Population StudiesAndré A. DhondtDirector, Citizen ScienceJanis DickinsonDirector, MarketingMary GuthrieDirector, Information ScienceSteve KellingDirector, Fuller Evolutionary BiologyIrby J. LovetteDirector, Conservation ScienceKenneth V. RosenbergDirector, EducationNancy M. TrautmannDirector, Macaulay LibraryMichael S. WebsterAdministrative BoardEdward W. Rose III, ChairKathryn M. KiplingerEllen G. AdelsonDavid S. LitmanAndrew H. BassLinda R. MacaulayJames R. CarpenterClaudia MadrazoScott V. EdwardsWilliam K. MichenerAlexander Ellis IIIEdwin H. MorgensWilliam T. EllisonWendy J. PaulsonVictor L. EmanuelLeigh H. Perkins, Jr.Russell B. FaucettElizabeth T. RawlingsJohn H. FooteJulia M. SchnuckAlan J. FriedmanRobert F. SchumannH. Laurance FullerCarol U. SislerRonald R. HoyJennifer P. SpeersImogene P. JohnsonJosephH. WilliamsEric J. JollyDavid W. WinklerAustin H. KiplingerLiving Bird, ISSN 1059-521-X, is published quarterly, in winter,spring, summer, and autumn, by the Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Periodicals postage is paid at Ithaca, New York.POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Living Bird, 159Sapsucker Woods Road, Ithaca, New York 14850. Telephone: (607)254-BIRD. Living Bird is free to members of the Lab, a nonprofitmembership organization. Our mission: To interpret and conservethe earth’s biological diversity through research, education, andcitizen science focused on birds.For more information please write to our Membership Department. Membership is 40 a year. The Lab assumes no responsibilityfor unsolicited photographs or manuscripts.Copyright 2010 Cornell Lab of Ornithology.4 Living Bird / Summer 2010Overkill?I read with dismay the article by HughPowell chronicling the adventures of fouryoung ornithologists surveying the Peruvian wilderness (“Stretching the Canvas,”Spring 2010). What started out as the story of the commendable efforts of youth toinventory the birdlife of a remote mountain range soon turned into an apology forcollecting birds in the field. Although theexuberance of discovering a potential newspecies perhaps justifies the collecting ofthe type specimen, there is no excuse forcollecting another seven. What measureswere taken to assure that “the barbets werenumerous here”? We are not told. Whatis more likely is that the enthusiasts collected every bird they could find.After acknowledging that “camerascan now capture plumage details by themegapixel, and PCR machines can assayDNA from just a flake of tissue,” Powellpostulates that “it is only by making specimens that scientists gain a full record ofan animal or plant for the future.” Whatabout the present? The students could notpossibly have determined the status of thebarbet in just three weeks. What they didwas follow the maxim of their institutional predecessors of the last century: a birdin the hand is worth two in the bush.The “full record” of birds collected inthe past is nowhere near as complete as today’s living records of birds’ behavior captured by video and audio in the field. Theloss to the ecosystem in killing birds fortaxonomic use is far greater than the benefits gained by an institution that maintains a skin collection.We live in times when tropical andsubtropical forests are everywhere endangered and their inhabitants threatenedwith extinction. At the same time, conservationists and birders increasingly areengaged in the celebration of living birds.We need fewer “evolutionary biologists”who are unable to establish the place ofthe new barbet “in the tree of life” withouta specimen. This is truly the statement ofthe taxonomist at play. (“Scientists learnthe boundaries that define a species aswell as the way the species varies fromone individual to another.”) It simply isnot important at this stage of the worldto place a newly discovered species in theproper phylogenetic sequence using thisapproach. Nor do we need to learn thatbarbets “eat largely fruit” by examiningthe contents of their stomachs; we alreadyknow it from the most casual observation.Perhaps it is time to examine the commonality of interests between biologists,birders, and conservationists. Too oftenbirders assume that there is a unity ofgoals. Yet atavism runs deep. Apparentlythere is yet an institutionalized philosophyof collecting among the biologist community that harkens back to the expeditionsof old, the glory days of natural historymuseums. Those of us who are not steepedin so hoary a tradition can make protestby refraining from funding programs thatharbor such perspectives and urging nations and conservation land managers todeny access to institutional researchersuntil they are willing to commit to a setof lay-developed guidelines defining trulyresponsible, noninvasive field techniques.It is unfortunate that the considerableaccomplishments of the Peruvian expedition are overshadowed by the eulogy to apractice whose times has passed, but thatis indeed the slant the author chose toimpart. A modest proposal here: the Labshould consider arming the host of fieldworkers who search in vain for the Ivorybilled Woodpecker—funded by the contributions of many who desire in vain torevive an extinct species—with 20-guageshotguns in case perchance the Lord GodBird should be resurrected before them.Would science not be served in taking thespecimen, albeit the last individual? Forthen, we all could learn its place in the treeof (past) life.TERRY D. MORGANDALLAS, TEXASTerry Morgan articulates the view of manynature enthusiasts who question the utilityand morality of collecting bird specimens.No responsible scientist would condonecollecting an Ivory-billed Woodpecker today, for any reason whatsoever. The mostimportant principle followed by all modernscientists who collect birds for study is to sacrifice no more than a few individuals of anyone species, and only when doing so has nochance of jeopardizing a local population ofthat species. Numerous studies confirm thatremoval of a few individuals from a healthybird population has no lasting impact onpopulation size. Even adult territory holders are quickly replaced by juveniles or nonbreeding “floaters,” just as they are routinelyreplaced after being taken by a predator.Scientific collecting of birds by trained professionals and students produces absolutelyno net “loss to the ecosystem,” while yieldingextremely useful information about the biology of the species under study.Although the total population size of thenew barbet was not estimated in detail, itcould reasonably be assumed to number inthe thousands. Barbets of the genus Capitoare territorial and distributed more or lesscontinuously across the forest canopy in appropriate habitat. The students did ascertainthat the forest occupied by this species onthis mountain ridge extended unbroken formany miles north and south of their campsites, and that the barbets were numerous.They surmised that eight specimens would besufficient to provide some understanding ofindividual, sexual, morphological, and genetic variation, while having no lasting effect on local population size. They did studya number of other individuals in life.Morgan questions the importance oflearning the evolutionary relationships of anew species, but this is only one of myriadquestions that can be investigated usingwell-documented specimens. For thousandsWFrom the Editorhen I heard about the oil leak gushing from the seafloor in the Gulf ofMexico, it seemed like déjà vu, bringing back haunting memories of an oilspill I witnessed two decades ago in California. An oil tanker had rippeda hole in its hull, and more than 400,000 gallons of Alaska crude escaped into the sensitivewaters just off Bolsa Chica Ecological Reserve—my favorite place to go birding.Nothing could have prepared me for the grim nightmare world I walked through the nextday. Vast swaths of beach sand were covered in oil, and the whole place reeked of petroleum.Birds were already dying, washing up on the shore, covered in oil and gasping for air.I volunteered as a bird cleaner, helping to wash the stricken birds in hot, soapy water untilevery last vestige of oil was gone. We did release a large number of cleaned birds, though it’sdifficult to say how many ultimately survived or how much damage was done to the habitat.Of course, the ecological effects of the 1990 Bolsa Chica oil spill pale in comparison with theDeepwater Horizon leak, which is unprecedented in size and scope. The Lab of Ornithology hasa team in place documenting the effects of the oil and has also begun deploying underwaterrecorders to determine how marine animals are responding to the leak. And eBird participantsare submitting Gulf Coast bird-sighting reports, providing important data. To learn more aboutthese efforts, see page 8.of years humans have been accumulatingknowledge about how the natural world isconstituted, and how it got that way. Wethink these are still worthwhile endeavors,and today’s many threats to global biodiversity make understanding details of the natural world all the more crucial. Videos, photographs, and sound recordings are indeedvaluable for many kinds of analyses, but theycannot replace actual specimens as treasuretroves of additional information about realorganisms and the diversity of life on earth.Ethical questions outside the context of effects on the population are beyond the scopeof this response, but certainly a case can bemade that gaining knowledge about a newspecies represents an ethically defendabletrade-off for sacrificing the lives of several ofits individuals at no cost to its population.My response had to be brief here, butreaders interested in a more in-depth discussion should read the articles listed below.John FitzpatrickLouis Agassiz Fuertes DirectorCornell Lab of OrnithologyRemsen, J.V. 1995. The importance of continued collecting of bird specimens to ornithology and bird conservation. Bird Conservation International 5:145-180.Remsen, J.V. 1997. Museum specimens: science, conservation, and morality. Bird Conservation International 7:363-366.Bekoff, M., and A. Elzanowski. 1997. Collecting birds:the importance of moral debate. Bird Conservation International 7:357-361.Winker, K. et al. 1991. The importance of avian collections and the need for continued collecting. The Loon63:238-246.We welcome letters from readers. Writeto The Editors, Living Bird, 159 SapsuckerWoods Road, Ithaca, New York 14850, orsend email to livingbird@cornell.edu.Living Bird / Summer 2010 5

U LT I M AT E B I R D I N G T R I P O D SLightweight, Durable, Affordable Tripods for BirdingASSEMBLEDIN THE USAHigh performance. made highly affordable.Introducing the new MeoProTM series binoculars.8X 10X 42mm6.5X 32mmSUPERA.M.T.ALLOYMULTI-LAYERCARBON FIBERPRO 330 EZPRO 614 CFMax Height: 62.0 in.Max Load: 8.8 lbs.Weight: 3.66 lbs.Max Height: 61.22 in.Max Load: 6.6 lbs.Weight: 1.96 lbs.EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION BY:7642 Woodwind Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92647Visit our website atAll about BirdsA Short Illustrated Historyof OrnithologyValérie Chansigaudwww.thkphoto.com“This is the deepest and most thorough history of ornithologythat I have seen. The mixture of history, biographical sketches,period illustrations, and science give it a broad appeal, andthe writing is quite engaging. An important feature of thebook is its coverage of European ornithology, which nicelycomplements books on the history of American ornithologyand birding. The book’s timeline is especially valuable.”—Frank Gill, former president of the AmericanOrnithologist’s UnionCloth 29.95 978-0-691-14519-8Not for sale in the Commonwealth (except Canada) and the European UnionBirds of PeruRevised and Updated EditionThomas S. Schulenberg,Douglas F. Stotz, Daniel F. Lane,John P. O’Neill &Theodore A. Parker IIIWith a foreword byDr. Antonio Brack EggNew2010MeoPro’s new silky smooth focusing system maintainsconsistent performance even in extreme cold environmentsand the central diopter control simplifies custom tuning.“A major accomplishment.”—Birder’s WorldMEOBRITE550ION ASSISTED LENS COATINGSMEOSHIELDANTI-ABRASION LENS COATING“[T]he guide against which all others for the New Worldtropics will be judged.”—Don Stap, AudubonPrinceton Field GuidesTMThe new MeoPro series binoculars make alpha glass performance more affordable. Premium grade precisionPaper 39.50 978-0-691-13023-1Not for sale in the Commonwealth (except Canada) and the European Unionlenses guarantee brilliant, razor sharp edge-to-edge resolution while the lightweight, ergonomic design makeshandling in the field supremely comfortable. Meopta’s MB550 TM Ion Assisted lens coatings deliver an industry leading light transmission of 99.8% per lens surface while ourTMMeoShieldTM anti-abrasion coatings are military spec tough and protect external optics from damage. Available in 6.5x32, 8x42 and 10x42 formats, each MeoPro binocularfeatures phase corrected prisms which provide phenomenal contrast and crisp, neutral color reproduction. Generous eye relief and800.777.4726press.princeton.edu6 Living Bird / Summer 2010comfortable, 3-position twist up eyecups complement the wide, flat, field of view. All this, with a lifetime transferable warranty, startingat an affordable price of only 349. Meopta. leading the way in optical precision for over 77 years.For more information about Meopta USA and our precision optics please call: 800-828-8928 or visit: www.meoptasportsoptics.comLiving Bird / Summer 2010 7

Around the LabGulf Coast WildlifeNeeds Our HelpThe View from Sapsucker WoodsOThe oil gushing into the Gulf ofMexico from the Deepwater Horizon well is an ecological catastrophe of unprecedented magnitude forall of the birds, fish, marine mammals,and other wildlife in the area and the habitats they need to survive.The Cornell Lab of Ornithology hasbeen working to document the effects ofthe massive leak and assess the damage tothe Gulf ’s sensitive ecosystem. Birders whoparticipate in eBird have been especiallyhelpful, providing more than 175,000bird observations from Gulf Coast states,including data on at least 11 species thatwere seen with oiled feathers. These datawill help greatly with the recovery effortas researchers and government agencies setpriorities for spill containment and cleanup efforts.In addition, the Cornell Lab’s Multimedia program sent a video crew to theA Brown Pelican mired in oil on Grand Terre, Louisiana, on June 5, 2010. This isbecoming an all-too-common sight as oil fouls sensitive shorelines along the Gulf. BenClock, a member of the Lab’s video crew, took this graphic image while documenting theeffects of the oil leak. The bird was subsequently rescued by wildlife rehabilitators.8 Living Bird / Summer 2010deaths is still to be determined. The Cornell Lab’s Bioacoustics Research Program,which has extensive experience in monitoring whales, has already begun deployingautonomous underwater recorders to pickup the sounds of sperm whales, Bryde’swhales, and other underwater life in theGulf—both in areas already affected andin areas so far unaffected by the oil—to seeif they can detect changes in the numbersand movements of these animals as the oilspill spreads.Lab of Ornithology members and otherconcerned citizens have been contactingus since the start of the oil spill to see howthey can help. Birders can make a vitalcontribution by submitting Gulf Coastbird sightings to eBird at www.ebird.orgor by making a donation to help with theLab’s conservation work, either on ourwebsite www.birds.cornell.edu/helpbirdsor by calling (866) 989-BIRD (2473).To get the latest news from the field, visitour Round Robin blog at http://redesign.birds.cornell.edu.—Tim Gallagher“rescues,” but let’s not fool ourselves. The bi-population crashes, and food-web collapsesvironmental calamity in U.S.ology of birds tarred at sea by crude oil is wellaffecting thousands of species within thehistory exploded in the Gulfknown—a few are found on shore and given aGulf ecosystem. Events like this can have eco-of Mexico. As its scale becamereprieve by well-meaning rescuers, but mostlogical effects that may last decades, or per-apparent, the Cornell Lab dispatched a videowill die, horribly and anonymously, outsidehaps much longer. More than 20 years aftercrew and several science journalists to Loui-our reach. Birds are toughthe Exxon Valdez oil spill, wesiana. Their mission is to document the full,creatures when it comes toare still learning about howbehind-the-scenes stories involving the richfacing natural hazards—afterpopulations and ecosystemsbiological diversity along the Gulf shoresall, those that could not sur-respond to such unnatural di-and what a huge oil-drilling accident revealsvive storms, droughts, floods,sasters. Even as we decry thisabout longer-term threats to this uniqueand fires through the millen-calamity and call for cautionecosystem. We expect to be covering thisnia long since died out with-against new ones, we need tostory for months, well after it becomes tooout leaving descendants. Butavoid empty hand wringing.old and familiar for the evening news.birds were never built to han-Our chief priority must be todle environmental onslaughtsmobilize the process of learn-As oil continues to spew and spreadJON REISGulf to document the effects of the oilspill on birds for researchers, policy makers, and the public. They were there atLouisiana’s Barataria Bay on June 8 as oilwashed past the booms and into the sensitive ma

Director, Bird Population Studies André A. Dhondt Director, Citizen Science Janis Dickinson Director, Marketing Mary Guthrie Director, Information Science Steve Kelling Director, Fuller Evolutionary Biology Irby J. Lovette Director, Conservation Science Kenneth V. Rosenberg Director, Education Nancy M. Trautmann Director, Macaulay Library .

Related Documents:

BeLux October 2015 vat incl. Little Bird 1x Little Bird piece 100 Bird 1x Bird piece 150 Super Bird 1x Super Bird piece 250 Sub AIR Wireless subwoofer piece 600 Bird pack 2 stands L&B 2x stand for Little or Bird pack 140 Bird pack 2 stands Super 2x stand for Super pack 180 iTransmitter High definition wireless piece 90 USB Transmitter Wireless transmitter piece

Base Controller Brand Base Controller Model Add-on Brand Add-on Model Based Controllers Add-on Qualifying Products List as of Aug 01, 2021 . Rain Bird ESP-LXME Rain Bird IQ4G-USA Rain Bird ESP-LXME Rain Bird IQNCC4G Rain Bird ESP-LXME Rain Bird IQNCCEN Rain Bird ESP-LXME Rain Bird IQNCCRS. Page 5 of 5

Bird Care Tips Keep the bird in a warm room. Feed your bird food it is used to eating. Give your bird twelve hours of quiet and darkness each day. Do not handle your bird for the first few weeks. Except during playtime, keep the bird in its cage. Avoid loud noises around your bird.

Various species of birds have unique bird calls. These bird calls are distinct based on inflection, length, and context, meaning the same bird may have more than one call. A device that would analyze the signal and identify the bird based on the bird call could be of tremendous help to an ornithologist.

Behavior: How a bird acts can be a great clue for identification. Being a careful observer of bird behavior can help you take your bird identification to the next level. How is the bird sitting, eating, or flying? For example, when looking at the bird's posture, note if the bird is upright or horizontal. These traits can help

the bird-scarer must be justified and you must be able to demonstrate you are complying with best practice at all times. National Farmers Union leaflet: 'Bird Deterrents and Bird Scarers Bird-scarers must only be used to protect crops and be used only where there is a reasonable expectation of being effective. Although the use of bird-

LIVING AND NONLIVING THINGS. What is a LIVING thing? If something is LIVING - it is ALIVE ! x A plant is a living thing. x A n animal is a living thing. x YOU are a living thing. These are . living things: a tree . a cat a person . What can living th ings

fessional bird watchers sometimes disagree on the species given an image of a bird. It is a difficult problem that pushes the limits of the visual abilities for both humans and computers. Although dif-ferent bird species share the same basic set of parts, different bird species can vary dramatically in shape and appearance.