2024 Durant/2025 Channing “The Durant”

2y ago
26 Views
3 Downloads
908.35 KB
19 Pages
Last View : 10d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Dahlia Ryals
Transcription

ZONINGA D J U S T M E N T SBOS t a f fARDR e p o r tFOR BOARD ACTIONFEBRUARY 28, 20132024 Durant/2025 Channing – “The Durant”Use Permit #12-10000017 to demolish a church and construct an eightstory, 96-unit, apartment building with a mix of one, two, and threebedroom units and basement level parking with 36 parking spaces.I. BackgroundA. Land Use Designations:General Plan: DT – DowntownZoning: C-DMU – Downtown Mixed Use District BufferB. Zoning Permits Required:Use Permit for construction of dwelling units, under BMC Section 23E.68.030Use Permit for construction of 10,000 sq. ft. gross floor area, under BMCSection 23E.68.050Use Permit for demolition of a non-residential dwelling unit, under BMC Section23C.08.050.AUse Permit to allow a front yard setback of greater than five feet, under BMCSection 23E.58.070.CUse Permit to allow a front yard setback less than five feet when confronting aresidentially zoned property, under BMC Section 23E.04.050.EUse Permit to reduce the required 20-foot setback where the building exceeds 45feet, on an interior side or rear lot line that abuts a residentially zoned lot, underBMC Section 23E.58.070.C.2Use Permit to reduce the required 5-foot setback on the portion of the buildinggreater than 65 feet from lot frontage and more than 20 feet in height, under BMCSection 23E.68.070.CAdministrative Use Permit to allow architectural projections (e.g. elevatorenclosures) to exceed the height limit, under BMC Section 23E.04.020.C2120 Milvia Street, Berkeley, CA 94704 Tel: 510.981.7410 TDD: 510.981.7474E-mail: zab@ci.berkeley.ca.usFax: 510.981.7420

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 2 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013C. Waivers/Reductions Requested Pursuant to State Density Bonus Law:Building height of 84 feet where 50 feet is allowed, up to a 60-foot maximumheight allowable with a Use Permit (23E.68.070.A)D. CEQA Determination:Categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines (“In-FillDevelopment Projects”).The proposed project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designationand policies (see “General Plan Consistency” for further discussion), and with theapplicable zoning designation and regulations, with the exception of mandateddensity bonus waivers/modifications (see under “Key Issues” for furtherdiscussion).The project occurs within the Berkeley city limits on a project site of no more thanfive acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.The site was previously developed and has no value as habitat for endangered,rare or threatened species.The project would not result in any significant effects related to traffic (see under“Key Issues” for further discussion), noise, air quality or water quality.The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.Furthermore, none of the exceptions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply, asfollows: (a) the site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area, (b) there areno cumulative impacts, (c) there are no significant effects, (d) the project is notlocated near a scenic highway, (e) the project site is not located on a hazardouswaste site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and (f) the project will notaffect any historical resource (see under “Committee Review–LandmarksPreservation Commission” for further discussion).E. Parties Involved:Applicant/ArchitectDave Johnson, Johnson Lyman Architects, 1375 LocustStreet, #202, Walnut Creek, CA 94596DeveloperBill Schrader, The Austin Group LLC, 164 Oak Road,Alamo, CA 94507Property Owner2024 DurantPresbytery of San Francisco, 2024 Durant Street, Berkeley,CA 94704Property Owner2025 ChanningTu Casa Properties Inc., 2140 Santa Cruz Avenue B204,Menlo Park, CA 94025File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 3 of 19Figure 1: Vicinity MapFile: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 4 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013Figure 2: Site PlanFile: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 5 of 19Table 1: Land Use InformationLocationExisting UseZoning DistrictGeneral PlanDesignationSubject PropertiesChurch Offices & Vacant LotC-DMU BufferDowntownNorthMulti-Family ResidentialC-DMU BufferDowntownSouthAuto Repair & Multi-FamilyResidentialC-DMU Buffer & R-3Downtown & HighDensity ResidentialEastMulti-Family, Parking Lot,CommercialC-DMU BufferDowntownWestSenior Housing, Multi-FamilyHousingR-3High DensityResidentialSurroundingPropertiesTable 2: Special CharacteristicsCharacteristicApplies toProject?ExplanationDensity BonusYApplicant has requested a density bonus, but no concessions.Encroachments intoPublic Right-of-WayNHistoric ResourcesNInclusionaryHousingYProject provides 7 inclusionary units.Seismic HazardsNSite is not mapped within any hazard zones.Soil/GroundwaterContaminationNSite has no history of soil or groundwater contamination.Green BuildingYProject approval is conditioned to meet LEED Gold or higher.The project does not propose any encroachments into thepublic right-of-way.The church to be demolished does not meet the criteria for theCalifornia Register or a City of Berkeley Landmark.There are no abutting or confronting historic resources.File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 6 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013Table 3: Project ChronologyDateActionMay 4, 2012Application submittedJuly 19, 2012DRC Preview MeetingAugust 16, 2012DRC Preliminary MeetingSeptember 6, 2012LPC Demo Referral MeetingSeptember 20, 2012Continuation DRC Preliminary MeetingNovember 19, 2012Density Bonus Plan Set SubmittedDecember 10, 2012Application deemed completeDecember 13, 2012DRC Preliminary MeetingJanuary 10, 2013Public hearing notices mailed/postedJanuary 24, 2013ZAB hearing—Continued to February 28, 2013February 8, 2013PSA deadlineFebruary 14, 2013Public hearing notices mailed/postedFebruary 28, 2013ZAB hearing11. Project must be approved or denied within 60 days after being determined to be exempt from CEQA, or 60 daysafter adoption of a negative declaration, or 180 days after adoption of an EIR (Govt. Code §65950).File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 7 of 19Table 4: Development StandardsStandardBMC Sections 23E.68.0700802024 DurantLot Area (sq. ft.)Existing Conditions2025 ChanningProposed(Lot Merge)Permitted/Required13,4749,23022,704---Gross Floor Area (sq. ft.)8,9590113,279---Floor Area Ratio0.6605---Total0096---Affordable0070Average (ft.)18063.25---84Maximum (ft.)260(43.5 on theChanning parcel)5060 (with Use Permit)(1)Stories20(4 on theChanning parcel)33n/a11DwellingUnitsBuildingHeight80 - 5 max. (where ight 20’)0 (where building height 20’)15 (portion of lot confrontingR-3)(2)Front(Channing)---n/an/a130 - 5 max. (where buildingheight 20’)0 (where building height 20’)5West SideEast Side55n/an/a(4)5(8 on the Durantparcel)20 (where building 45’ in3.75 (tobalconies; 6.5 toface of building onthe Durant parcel)0 (0-65’ from lot frontage)5 ( 65’ from lot frontagewhere building 20’ in height)(5 on theChanning parcel)15 ( 65’ from lot frontagewhere building 75’ in height)height)(5)Lot Coverage (%)58065---Usable Open Space (sq. ft.)n/an/a8,09680 per unit7,680 totalAutomobile1303632 (for DUs: 1:3 units)Vehicle Sharing0011Bicycle00100Parking(1)(2)(3)(4)2029 Channing Way holds an easement on 2025 Channing Way limiting building height to 47-feet.As typical of many through lots, this property has two frontages and no rear.All setbacks may be modified by a Use PermitWhen a side yard abuts a lot in a residential District, the minimum width of the side yard shall be five (5) feet (BMC§23E.04.050).(5) For a lot that abuts the interior side lot line of a residentially-zoned lot, a new building shall be set back from theshared property line by 20 feet where the building exceeds 45 feet in (BMC §23E.68.070.C.2).File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 8 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013Table 5: Project Summary: Units, Bedrooms, and Useable Opens Space by FloorBuildingLevelGrossArea(sq. ft.)1 BdrmUnits2 BdrmUnits3 BdrmUnitsBedroomCountApartmentCountOpenSpace(sq. 88Bedrooms78Bedrooms96 Units8,09626 Units44 Units26 Units192BedroomsTOTALII.Project SettingA. Neighborhood/Area Description:The properties (2024 Durant and 2025 Channing) are located in the buffer subarea of the Downtown Mixed Use zoning district, in what was previously the R-4residential district before the 2012 City adoption of the Downtown Plan andsubsequent Ordinance revisions. The Durant side of the project has apartmentbuildings across the street and to the west, including Satellite senior housing(Stuart Pratt Manor) directly adjacent to the parcel. The parking lot of a largecommercial retail building is directly to the east. Further east of the project site isShattuck Avenue’s commercial strip, which is characterized by a mix ofcommercial uses, predominately retail and food service establishments. On theChanning side, there are apartment buildings to the east and across the street,with smaller residential structures to the west.B. Site Conditions:The subject site is comprised of two separate parcels (2025 Channing Way and2024 Durant Avenue) located mid-block between Channing Way to the south andDurant Avenue on the north, and between Milvia Street on the west and ShattuckAvenue on the east.The parcel at 2024 Durant Avenue is a 13,474-square foot, L-shaped lot that is 130feet deep, with 89 feet of frontage on Durant Avenue and 123 feet along the rear.The west edge of the property makes a right angled jog between front and rear. TheFile: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 9 of 19property is occupied by a church, a small garden, and a surface parking lot in thenortheast corner.The parcel at 2025 Channing Way is an 8,959-square-foot rectangular lot that is 130feet deep and 71 feet wide. In the early 1990s, the site was left vacant after servingas a parking lot for a commercial building at 2029 Channing Way. In 1995, thecommercial building at 2029 Channing Way was demolished and replaced with a 20unit, five-story/50-foot apartment building. 2029 Channing Way holds an easementon the subject parcel limiting building height to 47-feet.There is a current entitlement on the property at 2025 Channing Way, approved asUse Permit #02-10000031, and modified by Use Permit Modification #11-70000012,for a four-story, 43.75-foot tall, 13,843-square-foot building to contain 30 dwellingunits and basement-level parking for 15 vehicles and 20 bicycles. This currentproject will supersede all previous entitlements.III. Project DescriptionThe project proposes to demolish the existing church building located at 2024 DurantAvenue, merge the lot with 2025 Channing Way, and construct a 96-unit apartmentbuilding. The portion of the building located on 2025 Channing Way, would be fourstories with a maximum height of 43.5 feet, while the portion of the building located at2024 Durant Avenue, would be eight stories with a maximum height of 84 feet.The project includes a ground level patio, two roof top gardens/decks, an exercise room,a lobby, a lounge area, and a basement level parking garage for 35 vehicles with accessoff of Durant Avenue. The 96-units are a mix of one, two, and three bedroom units, allwith full kitchens, baths, and in-unit laundry. Seven of the units would be affordable toVery Low Income households: those earning 50 percent or less of the area medianincome (AMI). See discussion under Issues and Analysis for further details.Based on the number of affordable units proposed, the project is entitled to a densitybonus and concessions or incentives under Government Code Section 65915. In orderto accommodate the density bonus units, the applicant has requested both an increasein the building height from 50 feet to 84 feet (i.e., 5 stories to 8 stories on the DurantParcel) as well as a reduction in the required 15-foot setback on the portion of thebuilding greater than 65 feet from lot frontage and more than 75 feet in height (whichcan be granted with a Use Permit under the C-DMU provisions, 23E.68.070.C). Theapplicant is not requesting any concessions. See “Key Issues” below for further details.IV. Community DiscussionA. Neighbor/Community Concerns: Prior to submitting the application to the City, apre-application poster was erected by the applicant in May, 2012. On Wednesday,May 23, 2012, the applicant held a community meeting located on site at the SanFrancisco Presbytery offices. The applicant invited nineteen community groups;seven people attended the meeting. On January 10, 2013, the City mailed notices toadjoining property owners and occupants, and to interested neighborhoodFile: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 10 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013organizations. Since project submittal, staff has received numerous public commentsand a petition against the project. Project specific comments address the height,massing, and sunlight impacts of the proposed project. These points are discussedin Key Issues below. A multitude of public correspondence questions the underlyingzoning and general plan designation of the subject site. Since these topics are notproject specific but are related to the adoption of the Downtown Area Plan, they arenot discussed in the staff report. Staff response to these issues is, however, includedwith the correspondence. Please see Attachment 5 for a summary of publiccomment. For all public comment received since the inception of the project, pleasesee the online file:http://192.168.100.22/Planning and Development/Zoning Adjustment Board/2024Durant.aspx .B. Committee Review:1. Landmarks Preservation Commission: The project involves demolition of theexisting church building that is located at 2024 Durant Avenue and wasconstructed in 1947-48. Pursuant to BMC Section 23C.08.050.C, any applicationfor a Use Permit to demolish a non-residential building that is 40 or more yearsold shall be forwarded to the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) forreview prior to consideration of the Use Permit. The applicant hired anarchitectural historian who prepared a historic evaluation of the buildinginitiate a Landmark or Structure-of-Merit designation.2. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (DRC) previewed theproject on July 19, 2012 and provided several advisory comments includingredesigning the useable open space (e.g. roof decks) with more definition andreducing noise impacts to adjacent neighbors; and redesigning the interiorspaces so that all bedrooms have natural lighting (i.e. windows). Afterincorporating these comments, the applicants resubmitted a plan set and therevised project was reviewed for preliminary design on August 16, 2012. At themeeting, the DRC continued the preliminary design review with the followingcomments:Balconies appear to be too close to adjacent building.Bedroom windows on the side elevations are too big for the proximity tonearby buildings.Open space at ground floor should be predominately passive.Recommend moving viewing patio back from edge of building.Strongly opposed that living spaces still have no natural light.The applicants revised the plan set and went before the DRC on September 20,2012. The DRC made a favorable recommendation (vote: 5-1-0-0) to the ZAB onthe proposed design with specific direction for Final Design Review, including:File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 11 of 19Every habitable space shall have natural light and ventilation.Common living spaces shall not be separated from kitchen/eatingspaces.Gathering areas on the roof remain small and manageable.All roof top equipment shall be shown at Final Design Review (FDR).Rooftop mechanical equipment shall be designed so the noise does notaffect the open space.Window coverings shall be shown at FDR.Provide screening between the ground floor bedrooms and the adjacentwalkway.The DRC was mixed on whether the balconies on the northwest corner of thebuilding should remain in the design. The Committee requested that ZAB make adetermination as to whether the balconies should remain as a quality designelement or whether the impact on the existing adjacent residential units is toomuch. The DRC also requested the applicants to provide a furniture layout so thatZAB can better determine the adequacy of the living spaces.Subsequent to the September 20th meeting, the applicant revised the project toinclude below market-rate housing and density bonus units. The project wentback to the DRC on December 13, 2012. The DRC passed a recommendation forapproval (4-1-0-2). The DRC believes that the design quality of the project meetsthe City’s guidelines and standards, and that the new 8 floor/4 floor massing hasnice proportions, but felt that eight stories at this location appears to be in conflictwith what was envisioned in the buffer area. The DRC offered the followingconditions for the project:Conditions:South elevation of the Durant side of the project requires more windowsand articulation.Address reflective roof surface on the Channing side of the project andreduce its visual impact as much as possible.Now that the units will be open to families, not just students, reconsider theproposed horizontal railings for a safer design and present at Final DesignReview.On January 15, 2013, the applicant resubmitted project plan sets incorporatingDRC conditions above.V. Issues and AnalysisA. Key Issues:1. CEQA Determination: As noted above, staff has determined that the project iscategorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) underthe “In-Fill Development Projects” exemption. The project meets all of therequirements of this exemption, as follows:File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 12 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013a. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation andpolicies, and with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, with theexception of waivers/modifications pursuant to State density bonus law.b. The project occurs within the Berkeley City limits on a project site of no morethan five acres, and is surrounded by urban uses.c. The parcels within the project site have previously been developed (one iscurrently vacant) and have no value as habitat for endangered, rare orthreatened species.d. The project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise,air quality or water quality. Regarding traffic, the project will not exceedsignificance criteria for any intersections or residential streets. The trafficengineer has reviewed the project’s traffic study and concurs with its findingthat there will be no significant traffic impacts.e. The site is already served by required utilities and public services, which willalso adequately serve the project.Furthermore, the project does not trigger any of the exceptions in CEQAGuidelines Section 15300.2. In particular, the project will not have any significanteffects due to unusual circumstances, nor any cumulatively significant impacts(such as traffic), nor will it adversely impact any designated historical resources.The existing buildings are not designated historical resources, and the LPCdeclined to initiate them for City landmark status at their meeting in September2012.The site is not included on any list of hazardous waste sites compiled pursuant toGovernment Code Section 65962.5. Additionally, the applicant has submitted ananalysis of potential air quality impacts and greenhouse gas emissions, and theanalysis shows that the project would be consistent with the guidelines of the BayArea Air Quality Management District.2. Building Height/Density Bonus: The Zoning Ordinance allows a “base project” of67,946 square feet with a total of 71 (70.7) “base” dwelling units, at this site.1These units could be accommodated in four flours on the Channing Street parceland five floors in the Durant Street parcel of the project. As allowable andencouraged by State law, the applicant is providing eleven percent of the baseproject units (i.e., 8 units) at prices affordable to Very Low Income households:those earning 50 percent or less of the area median income (AMI). Based on theprovision of these eight affordable units, the project qualifies for a density bonusof 35 percent of the base project, or 25 units, for a total of 96 dwelling units. Theproject is proposing to add three stories to the Durant parcel to accommodatethese 25 units. If the ZAB makes the required findings to approve the proposed1The Base Project is the version of the project that could be built without a density bonus or any modification ofdevelopment standards under the Zoning Ordinance.File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 13 of 19project, the Board must approve modifications to the development standards (e.g.building height) of the District in order to accommodate the density bonus.2As originally submitted, the project proposed a 74-unit building with 4 stories onthe Channing parcel and 6 stories on the Durant parcel. To build the 6th story onthe Durant parcel, the project had requested a Use Permit to exceed the 50-footheight limit on the Durant parcel of the project to allow the 60-foot maximum (6stories) allowable in the District.3 Four stories were proposed on the Channingparcel because it is encumbered by a deed restriction limiting the roof line to beno higher than 47 feet. To accommodate the additional 25 density bonus units,the applicant has designed the project to include three additional stories on theDurant parcel to accommodate the 25 density bonus units (seven on the sixthfloor and nine on each of the 7th and 8th floors), for a building with a total height ofeight (8) stories and 84 feet on the Durant parcel.Due to the height limitation on the Channing parcel, the design options foraccommodating the density bonus units are limited to the Durant parcel. Ascurrently proposed, the design has retained the existing 2,110 square feet ofground-level open space between the proposed building and the neighboringsenior center and multi-family property at 2023 Channing. Based on the siteconfiguration and limitations, the only other option to accommodate the densitybonus units would be to fill in this buffer open space area. Three units per floorcould potentially fit in this area resulting in a six-story building design with amassing that maxes out the building envelope. The reduction in two stories wouldresult in less shading for the upper two stories of the senior center during thesummer morning hours, but would come at the expense of building separationand additional massing impacts to the multi-family property at 2023 Channing.Staff believes that benefits of increased building separation exceed the impactsof the two additional floors.3. Neighborhood Compatibility: The neighborhood is a mix of two- to six-story multifamily residential structures along Durant and Channing, and one- to two-storycommercial buildings adjacent and fronting Shattuck Avenue. The subject site islocated within the buffer area of the newly implemented Downtown Mixed-UseDistrict with the R-3 Multi-Family Residential District to the west and theDowntown Mixed Use Corridor Area and Shattuck Commercial district to the east.As such, the proposed project represents a transition between the lower massingof the R-3 District (35-foot height limit) and the 75-height limit of the DowntownCorridor. Although initially proposed as a 6-story/4-story building, upon Councilsetting the affordable housing mitigation fee, the project was revised to include2Government Code Section 65915(e)(1) allows an applicant to submit to the City a proposal for waiver orreduction of any development standard, and states that in no case may a city apply any development standardthat will have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a housing development project that qualifiesfor a density bonus.3The project originally proposed 74 units and was later modified to 78 units. The base project, however, is 70.7units. So although the project originally proposed a Use Permit to exceed to height limit from 50’ to 60’, thisheight increase is now considered a modification to accommodate the density bonus units; a Use Permit is nolonger required if the project is to be approved.File: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

2024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 14 of 19ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 2013affordable and density bonus units. As described in the Density Bonus sectionabove, due to the deed restriction on the Channing Parcel limiting the height ofnew construction to 47 feet all density bonus units are accommodated on theDurant parcel. The result is an 8-story/4-story construction.Although taller than originally proposed, the project is not out of scale with theexisting development and will be proportionate with the new developmentopportunities in the C-DMU. The Channing portion of the building is four storiesand 43.5 feet in height, with a five-story, multi-family building to the east and athree-story, multi-family building to the west. The 84-foot, eight story portion ofthe building proposed on the Durant parcel is flanked by the Staples parking loton the east and a 6-story senior housing complex on the west. The latter buildingis itself non-conforming as the R-3 District has a 3-story, 35-foot maximum heightlimit.The project requests use permit approval to reduce the required 20-foot setbackdown to eight feet where the building exceeds 45 feet on an interior side or rearlot line that abuts a residentially zoned lot.DENSITY BONUSDEVELOPMENT AREAPortion of building requiring UPapproval to reduce 20-foot setback(west side only)Extent of east facing senior housingwindows and balconiesAs shown in the illustration above, the building area that would receive thesetback allowance has limited overlap with the window and balcony area of theadjacent senior housing. To reduce impacts on the Stuart Pratt senior housingdevelopment, the applicant pushed The Durant as far to the east away fromStuart Pratt (to the Staples side of the parcel) as possible on the ground level. Onthe Stuart Pratt side (west), the first 14 feet of the building is setback 13 feet fromthe property line, the next 45 feet is setback 8 feet from the property line, and thelast 47 feet has a 43-foot setback. The average setback of the Stuart Pratt side ofthe project is, therefore, 24.2 feet.Instead of expanding the footprint to the maximum allowable setback (5 feet), theproject is designed with a usable outdoor patio adjacent to the Stuart Pratt that isaccessible to all tenants of The Durant and that provides ample spacing betweenFile: G:\LANDUSE\Projects by Address\Durant\2024\UP 12-10000017\Document Finals\ZAB February 28, 2013\2013-02-28 ZAB StaffReport 2024 Durant.docx

ZONING ADJUSTMENTS BOARDFebruary 28, 20132024 DURANT/2025 CHANNINGPage 15 of 19the two buildings. Additionally, both driveway access and trash bin storage arelocated on the commercial (northeast) side of the building, while placing the lobbyentrance and landscaping next to the senior housing complex. To further limitimpacts on the adjacent residences, all proposed balconies on The Durant arerestricted to the front corners of the building and to areas that are above theneighboring buildings.As designed, The Durant is, therefore, both compatible with, and sensitive to, thedevelopment pattern of the area and provides a suitable transition from theresidentially zoned parcels to the west and to the mixed use zoning to the east.4. Noise: Concerns have been raised as to the potential noise impact that wouldoccur from the project, particularly from the congregation of residents in theuseable open space areas: the ground level patio and the two roof decks.Originally, the project proposed a full rooftop garden for both the “Durant Rooftop”and the “Channing Rooftop” totaling approximately 12,000 square feet. Theapplicant worked closely with staff and DRC

Feb 28, 2013 · 2024 Durant Avenue) located mid-block between Channing Way to the south and Durant Avenue on the north, and between Milvia Street on the west and Shattuck Avenue on the east. The parcel at 2024 Durant Avenue is a 13,474-square foot, L-shaped lot that is 130 feet deep, with 89 feet of frontage on Durant Avenue and 123 feet along the rear.

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

City of Durant AMR Smart Meter Installation Project Lake Durant FIGURE 1. MAP OF CITY OF DURANT Project Location The proposed project is located in the City of Durant in Bryan County, Oklahoma which is approximately 100 miles north of Dallas, Texas. A Shapefile of the City of Durant water service area has been submitted with this proposal.

EMPLOYMENT/UNEMPLOYMENT DATA. . . 36 . Bill Galvin Alderperson April 2024 Craig Stevens Alderperson April 2024 Steven Campbell Alderperson April 2024 Randy Scannell Alderperson April 2024 Chris Wery Alderperson April 2024 Brian Johnson Alderperson April 2024 Mark Steuer Alderperson April 2024 Melinda Eck Alderperson April 2024

Bribery and Corruption – V05.0 UPR GV12 - Effective: 9 June 2020 Bribery and Corruption . UPR GV12 version 05.0 . Policies superseded by this document . This document replaces version 04.0 of UPR GV12, with effect from 9 June 2020. Summary of significant changes to the previous version . The threshold for personal gifts in section 8.2.2 has been raised from 20 to 60. References to HEFCE .