Chess Combinations - Usvishakh

2y ago
8 Views
2 Downloads
1.60 MB
696 Pages
Last View : 12d ago
Last Download : 2m ago
Upload by : Tia Newell
Transcription

Chess CombinationsA collection of combinations from actual chess games and endgame studiesUmesh P. Narendran1

ContentsPreface90. Problems100.1. Combinations from actual games . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.2. Endgame studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371. The1.1.1.2.1.3.1.4.1.5.1.6.Knight forkSqueezing and forking: V & M Platov (Study), 1909 . .The ultimate deflection: Petrosian – Spassky, 1966 . .Several ideas: Capablanca – Fonaroff, 1918 . . . . .Squeeze a piece: Urban – Lason, 1989 . . . . . . . . . .Sacrifices and strange promotion: Lasker, Em. (Study), Mate or fork: H. Rinck (Study), . . . . . . . . . . . . .2. The2.1.2.2.2.3.pin74A pin is mightier than. . . : Schatz – Giegold, 1928 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75Exchange sac, pin and mate: Hickl – Pelletier, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . 78The pinner gets pinned: Morozov – Minasian, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . 80.606163656770723. The skewer813.1. Skewering queen: Benko (Study), 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824. Double check894.1. The power of double check: Réti – Taratakower, 1910 . . . . . . . . . . 904.2. Double check by undefended pieces: Olei – Grigorov, 1968 . . . . . . . . 925. Weak back rank5.1. You don’t want my Queen?: Adams – Torre, 1920 . .5.2. Climbing the staircase: Lowcki – Tartakower, 1937 .5.3. Deflections!: Alekhine – Amateur, 1939 . . . . . . .5.4. Clearing and Blocking: Réti – Bogoljubov, 1924 . . .94951001031056. Deflection6.1. Queen dies and pawn mates: Stahlberg – Becker, 19446.2. Lure and save: Fischer – Shocron, 1959 . . . . . . . . .6.3. Queen diversion: Trauth – Buglisi, 2010 . . . . . . . . .6.4. The brave rook: Andersson, U. – Mestel, J., 1982 . . .6.5. Winning deflection: Botvinnik – Capablanca, 1938 . . .6.6. Deflect and penetrate!: Koen – Umanskaja, 1993 . . . .6.7. Queen in time: Smirnov – Zelesnov, 1969 . . . . . . . .6.8. The hidden win: Passerotti – Aldrovandi, 2000 . . . .1071081091101121141171191202.

7. Overload1227.1. Too much overload: Rotlewi – Rubinstein, 1907 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1237.2. Relentless harassing: Steinitz – Bardeleben, 1895 . . . . . . . . . . . . 1268. Interference1298.1. : Fuchs – Korchnoi, 1965 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1309. Pawn promotion9.1. Catch it if you can. . . : Réti (Study), 1921 . . . . . . . . .9.2. Catch ’em if you can. . . : Réti (Study), 1928 . . . . . . . .9.3. Divert the guard: Lin – Wu, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9.4. Dont allow him to get through: Fontana (Study), 1943 . .9.5. Making hurdles: Troitsky, A.A. (Study), 1913 . . . . . .9.6. Make her queen!: Szulc, J. (Study), 1948 . . . . . . . . .9.7. The other pawn: Weinstein – Rohde, 1977 . . . . . . . .9.8. Difficult promotion: Anand – Moroviv-Fernadez, 19909.9. Resurrection!: Baseler – Mueller, 1962 . . . . . . . . .9.10. Olympiad win: Adhiban – Pineda, 2016 . . . . . . . . . .9.11. Pawn power: Vitomski – Volkov, 1975 . . . . . . . . . .9.12. Surprising first move: Sarychev, A. K. (Study), 1922 . .9.13. I don’t want this queen!: Benko (Study), 1987 . . . . . . .9.14. Hiding King: Rossolimo (Study), 1927 . . . . . . . . . . .9.15. The tale of two pawns and a Knight: Benko (Study), 19839.16. Use the enemy!: Kalandadze (Study), 2008 . . . . . . . .9.17. Stop the Bishop!: Heuacker (Study), 1930 . . . . . . . .9.18. When the Bishop goes away. . . : Krug (Study), 2015 . . . .9.19. Winning with the wrong Bishop: Vancura (Study), 1922 .9.20. Pawn race: Van der Heijden (Study), 2003 . . . . . . .9.21. Stop that rook!: Benko (Study), 1990 . . . . . . . . . . .9.22. Drawn with a win in hand: Svidler – Anand, 1999 . . . .9.23. Taking longer route: Benko (Study), 1997 . . . . . . . . .9.24. Let it queen!: Asaba (Study), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9.25. Which pawn? And to which piece?: Benko (Study), 1997 .9.26. Freeze all promotions!: Benko (Study), 1997 . . . . . . . 8118518819219419720020320821121610.á la Saavedra10.1. Win or draw, that is the question. . . : Saavedra (Study), 189510.2. Sac to Saavedra: Liburkin (Study), 1931 . . . . . . . . . . . .10.3. Remembering Saavedra: Ulrichsen (Study), 2001 . . . . . . .10.4. Exchange sacrifice to Saavedra: Dehler (Study), 1910 . . . . .10.5. Inspired by Saavedra: Troitsky (Study), 1924 . . . . . . . . .21922022322622823011.Shutting the path11.1. Buying time by queen sacrifice: Spassky – Korchnoi, 19553.234. . . . . . . . 235

11.2. On her majesty’s service: Averback – Korchnoi, 1965 .11.3. Shielding Knight: Karpov – Korchnoi, 1978 . . . . . .11.4. Sealing the exit: Friedman – Thornblom, 1973 . . . .11.5. Blocking castle: Fischer – Benko, 1963 . . . . . . . . .23723824024112.Interesting maneuvers24312.1. The windmill attack: Torre, C. – Lasker, Em., 1925 . . . . . . . . . . . 24412.2. Shuttling Rook: Karpov – Taimanov, 1977 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24612.3. Missed win: Naiditsch – Svidler, 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24813.Knight power25013.1. Dancing Knight: Larsen – Kristiansen, 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25113.2. The Spartan Knight: Beliavsky (Study), 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25314.Daring King25814.1. The royal warrior: Alekhine – Yates, 1922 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25914.2. The daredevil King: Short – Timman, 1991 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26115.Tying up15.1. Paralysis!: Kupferstich – Andreassen, 1953 . . . . .15.2. Win by stalemating: Benko (Study), 1980 . . . . . . . .15.3. Squeeze the King: Troitsky, A.A. (Study), 1895 . . . .15.4. Mating net with minimum pieces: Herbstmann (Study),15.5. Problem-like finish: Capablanca – Em. Lasker, 1924 .26326426827127527716.Winning intermediate move16.1. Intermediate check: Hort – Portisch, 1973 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16.2. Intermezzo: Pakleza – Sjodahl, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16.3. Missed win in Simul: Mr. G. – Ann Mary Thomas, 2018 . . . . . . . . .27928028228417.Domination17.1. Dancing partners: Lasker (Study), 1890 . . . . . . . .17.2. Q wins against Q: Anand – Thipsay, 1987 . . . . . .17.3. Fighting the equals: Benko (Study), 1999 . . . . . . .17.4. Queen’s best square: van Vliet, L. (Study), 1888 . . .17.5. Annoying rook: M. Harvel (Study), 1926 . . . . . . .17.6. Poor Rook!: sussmann (Study), 2000 . . . . . . . . . .17.7. Taming the Queen: H. Rinck (Study), 1902 . . . . . .17.8. Domination and symmetrical mate: Unknown (Study),17.9. A pawn can move two ways: Kubbel, L (Study), 192717.10.Castling to give way: Benko (Study), . . . . . . . . . .17.11.Leaving no square: Fischer – Schweber, 1970 . . . .17.12.Squeeze the Bishop in: Sonntag (Study), 2014 . . . .17.13.Cornered Knight: Afec (Study), 1978 . . . . . . . . . .2862872912953003023083103143163193213253294.

18.Mating sacrifice18.1. Bringing the King home: Lasker, Ed. – Thomas, 1912 . . . . . . . . .18.2. King or Queen?: Fischer – Reshevsky, 1958 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.3. An attack from nowhere!: Geller – Portisch, 1967 . . . . . . . . . .18.4. Sac, check and quiet move: Petrosian – Pachman, 1961 . . . . . . .18.5. The evergreen finish: Anderssen, A. – Dufresne, J, 1852 . . . . . .18.6. Power of double check: Torres – Alekhine, 1922 . . . . . . . . . . .18.7. Reversing moves: Alekhine – Hoelscher, 1933 . . . . . . . . . . . .18.8. Blind master’s Queen: Alekhine – von Feldt, 1916 . . . . . . . . . .18.9. Karel vs Karel: Opocensky – Hromadka, 1931 . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.10.Breaking the fortress: Thybo – Christensen, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . .18.11.Rapid conclusion: Carlsen – Karjakin, 1933 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.12.Missed mate #3 by a world champion: Carlsen – Giri, 2017 . . . . . .18.13.A racist brutally defeated: Wenzhe – Donner, 1978 . . . . . . . . . .18.14.Demolishing Queen sacrifice: Korchnoi – Petersons, 1965 . . . . . .18.15.Mating combination: Iljin – Tsydypov, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.16.Sac the queen, the King will do the rest: Schlechter – Meitner, 189918.17.Sac, sac and mate: Alekhine – Reshevsky, 1937 . . . . . . . . . . .18.18.Anastasia’s mate: Gygli – Henneberger, 1941 . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.19.Rook and Queen Sacrifice: Waitzskin – Frumkin, 1987 . . . . . . . .18.20.Missed win against World Champion: Schneider – Tal, 1982 . . . . . .18.21.Daring Queen: Rabinovich – Goglidze, 1939 . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.22.Mate, not just material advantage: Richter – J. K., 1935 . . . . . . .18.23.A deep sacrifice: Tarrasch – Romberg, 1893 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.24.Reverse the moves: Portmann – Andres, 1999 . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.25.Closing line: Buza – Kovacs, 1964 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18.26.Sac, sac, check and pawn move: Khalifman – Serper, 1994 . . . . . .18.27.Drag, beat and mate!: Botvinnik – Yudovich, 1933 . . . . . . . . . .18.28.Deep combination: Horowitz – Amateur, 1941 . . . . . . . . . . . .18.29.Never castle Q-side when the b-file is open!: Vistaneckis – Soler, . 6436736937137337537637938238338438638839019.Mate or winning material19.1. Win by an inch: Larsen – Kavalek, 1970 . . . . . . . . . . .19.2. Dragging the King: Ramdas – Joshi, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . .19.3. The bishop who never gave up: Mitrofanov (Study), 1953 . .19.4. Precise combination: Alekhine – Colle, 1925 . . . . . . . .19.5. Hard to find combination missed: Yudovich – Ragozin, 193719.6. That is a fast Knight!: Fleiscer – Amateur, 1938 . . . . . .19.7. Taking help from enemy: Havasi – Nemeth, 2016 . . . . . . .391392394395398400402405.20.Checkmate in endgame40820.1. Unexpected checkmate: De Roi – Kramer, 1962 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40920.2. Problem-like finish: Matokhin – Kuzmin, 1970 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41020.3. Mate threat in Endgame: Wachtel – Musiol, 1953 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4125

20.4. Mate or Skewer: A. Troitsky (Study), 1916 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41420.5. Model mates: Gurgenidze & Minski (Study), 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . 41620.6. The power of two rooks: Wotava (Study), 1948 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42021.Zugzwang and Reciprocal zugzwang21.1. Immortal zugzwang: Sämisch – Nimzowitsch, 192321.2. Zugzwang forcing capture: Aryan – Umesh, 2017 . .21.3. Cat-and-mouse game: Benko (Study), 1967 . . . . .21.4. Reciprocal zugzwang: Kasparyan (Study), 1946 . . .21.5. A Knight in the corner: Blundell (Study), 1995 . . .21.6. A Knight is enough: Troitsky, A. (Study), . . . . .21.7. The dark squares!: Kalgin (Study), 1966 . . . . . . .21.8. A Bishop is better than the Queen: Kaminer (Study),21.9. Surprising second move: Réti (Study), . . . . . . . .21.10.Unusual King walk: Chekhover (Study), 1937 . . . .21.11.Watch his moves!: Karlsson (Study), 1946 . . . . .21.12.Avoid stalemates: Selezniev (Study), 1939 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1925. . . . . . . . .42542642843143443744544745145445646246922.Lose a move47322.1. Lose a move?: Réti (Study), 1922 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47422.2. Helpless rooks: Khortov (Study), 1978 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47623.King and Pawn endings23.1. Basic K P ending: Tukmakov – Ubilava, 1972 .23.2. Pawn race: Benko (Study), 1957 . . . . . . . . . .23.3. Watch for key squares: Moravec (Study), 1952 . .23.4. Win at any cost: Benko (Study), 1989 . . . . . . .23.5. Which of the two moves?: Unknown (Study), . . .23.6. Jump into the winning zone: Birnov (Study), 197023.7. Tricky Endgame: Adamson, H. A. (Study), 1927 .48148248448649149649850424.Stalemate: Achieving and avoiding24.1. Force the draw: Mattison, H. (Study), 1913 . . . . . . . . . . .24.2. Avoiding draw: Joseph, D. (Study), 1922 . . . . . . . . . . . . .24.3. Avoiding draw: Full study: Joseph, D. (Study), 1921 . . . . . . .24.4. Stop pawn or stalemate?: Réti and Rinck (Study), 1935 . . . .24.5. Walking through stalemate to stop the pawn: Cohn (Study), 192824.6. Cat-and-mouses game: Matouš (Study), 1982 . . . . . . . . . . .24.7. The helpless Bishop on the edge: Konstantinov (Study), 1989 .507508510513515518520529.25.Other drawing techniques53225.1. Imposible draw: Sanal – van Foreest, 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53326.Incredible moves53626.1. What a move!: Levitsky – Marshall, 1912 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5376

26.2. Bolt in the blue: Ruthvik – Umesh, 2016 . . . . . .26.3. Brave queen!: Nimzowitsch – Nielsen, 1930 . . . .26.4. Fleeing to win: Khismatullin – Eljanov, 2015 . .26.5. The last way to handle a check: Umesh – Phil, 199726.6. Die for a tempo: Grinfed (Study), 1903 . . . . . . .26.7. Escaping checks: Evreinov (Study), 1959 . . . . . .53954054254554655027.Winning by strong defense55427.1. Blitz magic: Geller – Gufeld, 1961 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55527.2. Vacate and decay: Pichot – Cheparinov, 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55728.Endgame theory56028.1. Desc: Carvajal (Study), 1889 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56129.Sacrifice in endgame29.1. Move away, Mr. Bishop!: Topalov – Shirov, 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . .29.2. Stop that pawn!: Réti and Cheron (Study), . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29.3. The deadly way to stop a pawn: Solovstov (Study), 1890 . . . . . . . . .56356456757330.Several themes in one position30.1. Avoid stalemate: Horwitz and Kling (Study), 1858 . . . . .30.2. Half Bishop winning over dead Bishop: Salai (Study), 2011 . .30.3. Simplify to win: Atabayev – Bosiocic, 2016 . . . . . . . . .30.4. No check for me!: Mitrofonov (Study), 1967 . . . . . . . . .30.5. Many themes in one: Grigoriev, N.D. (Study), 1931 . . . . .30.6. What is the difference?: Neilsen (Study), 2017 . . . . . . . .30.7. Too complicated?: Bezgodkov and Tarasiuk (Study), 2018.57657758358959259760360931.Humans better than computers31.1. Draw by complete blockade: Rudolf (Study), 1912 . . . . . . . . . . . . .31.2. Zugzwang with twists: Matous (Study), 1975 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .31.3. Just a Bishop against a large army: Breukelen, Gigs Van (Study), 199031.3.1. Some interesting stories behind this puzzle . . . . . . . . . . . . . .616617619624628.32.Long-move problems63032.1. Doing the impossible: Benko (Study), 1998 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63132.2. Fight till end: Unknown (Study), ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63933.Other combinations33.1. Unexpected blow: Gaasland – Carlsen, 2001 . . . . .33.2. Dying for a cause: Carlsen – Gulbrandsen, 2002 . . .33.3. 13-year old’s 13th move: Nihal – Jensson, 2017 . . . . .33.4. Unnecessary tactics: Sefchect – Umesh, 1997 . . . . . .33.5. Deep and wide combination: Ščipkov – Mészáros, 199333.6. Very deep combination: Réti – Alekhine, 1925 . . . . .7.645646648650652658660

33.7. Missed win in World Candidates?: Caruana – Liren, 2018 . . . . . . . . . 665A. Famous players and composers mentioned in the puzzlesB. Special EndingsB.1. King Queen vs King Pawn ending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B.1.1. If the pawn hasn’t reached the seventh rank . . . . . . . .B.1.2. King Queen vs King Pawn (Central or Knight Pawn)seventh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .B.1.3. King Queen vs King Rook Pawn on the seventh . . .B.1.4. King Queen vs King Bishop Pawn on the seventh . .668. . .on. . . .678. . . 678. . . 678the. . . 680. . . 680. . . 682C. Notation686C.1. Figurine Algebraic Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686C.2. Annotation Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 686C.3. Nunn Notation for endgames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6868

PrefaceThis is a collection of chess puzzles (with solutions) published in the slack channel forthe Chess club in Workday Inc during 2016–’17.This book contains a little more than puzzles and answers. Many of them discuss thestory behind that position or game. Many have discussion on how one can go wrong insolving it. Many of them give cross-references to other similar problems.This book can be used in two ways, as a puzzle book for self-improvement, or as bookon chess tactics.All the problems are given at the beginning of the book (Pages 10–36 for Game positionsand 37–59 for endgame studies) in the order of solving difficulty. Games and Endgamestudies are given separately, because solving methodolgy will be slightly different forthem. Cross-reference to the solution is given with each problem.Solutions to all the problems are given in pages 60–667, each problem in a separatesection. These are arranged in various themes, and problems from games and studies aremixed.There are a lot of themes possible, and a problem may have multiple themes. Only mainthemes are listed. However, all themes are mentioned in the index (Starting at page 688.Look under “Themes”.) The index contains all the composers and all the games as well.The book has two appendices. Page 668 has a short description of many of the famouspersons (players and composers) mentioned in the book, also explaining some historicalaspects of the game itself. Page 678 has some theoretical notes (Mainly endgame theory)related to the material mentioned in the book.This book is a work in progress. More puzzles will be added in the future. The up-to-dateversion can be found at ons.pdf.Please let me know (umesh.p.nair@gmail.com) if you come across any errors, whetherit is an error in the chess analysis or just a typo.Umesh P Narendran9

0. Problems0.1. Combinations from actual games31abc23. ?defg Z0Z02PO0ZrZPJ1Z0ZQZ0Z087ha(Page 646)ibc1. 3Z0Z0Z0Z020OPL0OPZ1ZKZRS0Z087ha(Page 237)b1. ?10cdiefgh(Page 390) Þ39. ?d NZ0Op2PS0JPO0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0cg48bf(Page 108)h2ae 0ZPZ020O0Z0APO1Z0JRZ0MR8

A0O020Z0Z0OKZ1Z0Z0Z0Z0abc35. ?defg8 Þ7ha(Page 367)hbc40. 3O0Z0ZNs020Z0Z0Z0J1Z0Z0SRZ087ha(Page 409)bc1. ?11diefgh(Page 80) Þ1. ?d 0Z0OP20Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0cg88bf(Page 109)h6ae 0Z0ZP20Z0s0ZPL1Z0Z0ZRJ08

0Z0O02PO0ZBl0Z1Z0ZKZ0ZRabc9.?dhefg8 Þ7ha(Page 90)bc1. ?ifgh(Page 3Z0Z0Z0ZN2POQZ0ZPO1Z0Z0ZRZK87ha(Page 539)bc28. ?12diefgh(Page 346) Þ1. ?d BZ0ZP2PZQZ0OPZ1Z0S0ZRJ0ce128bdi10a QZ0Z02POPA0OPO1Z0JRZBMR8

Z0Z0O020Z0Z0Z0J1Z0Z0l0Z0bc1. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 545)hbc1. 0Z0Z0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0b1. ?cdhefgh(Page Z0Z0ZPZ02rZ0Z0l0O1Z0Z0Z0ZK8adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 277)b50. ?13cdhefgh(Page 356) Þa8 0ZNZ02PO0Z0OPO1SNAQJBZR8

M0Z0Z02PObS0ZPO1Z0Z0Z0ZKabc1. ?dhefg8 Þ7ha(Page 384)bc1. ?1. ?dhfgh(Page Z0L0Z02Pl0Z0OPO1S0Z0ZRJ0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 105)b1. ?14cdiefgh(Page 284) 0Z0O02PZ0Z0Z0O1Z0Z0ZRJ0ce208bdi18a 0O0O02PS0Z0ZPJ1Z0Z0Z0Z08

Z0O0lP20Z0Z0ZPZ1Z0ZRS0J0bc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 159)bc29. Z0ZNZ02POPZ0OPZ1Z0J0Z0ZRb16. ?cdhefgh(Page 3J0Z0ObA020Z0Z0O0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 348)b1. ?15cdhefg(Page 412)h Þa8 0Z0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1A0Z0Z0J08

2527abc1. ?defg L0Z02PO0Z0OPO1Z0S0ZRJ087ha(Page 158)ibc20. ?20. ?dhgh(Page M0ZBZ02PORZPO0l1Z0ZRLKZ0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 65)bc26. ?16diefgh(Page 240) 0Z0L02POPZ0OPO1Z0ZRZ0J0cf288beh26ad 0Z0Z020O0Z0oPO1Z0Z0ZKZ08

2931abc1. ?defg ONZQ2PO0Z0OPO1Z0ZRJ0ZR87ha(Page 555)ibc1. ?h30difgh(Page 3ZPZPZbO020ZRZ0O0Z1L0Z0ZRJ087ha(Page 369)bc37. ?17diefgh(Page 78) Þ1. ?c 0Z0ZP20O0L0OPZ1Z0ZRZRJ0be328ad PZNZ02qO0Z0OPO1Z0Z0Z0J08

ORZQZ02PO0Z0ZPO1Z0Z0ZRZKbc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 3Z0Z0ZRZ02PZpZ0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0J01. 0O3Z0O0Z0S02PZ0Z0OPZ1Z0Z0ZRJ08beh (Page 238)26. ?34adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 362)b32. ?18cdhefgh(Page 361) Þa8 0Z0Z020A0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z08

3739bc1. PZ0M0Z02PL0Z0Z0O1Z0Z0Z0ZK8ha(Page 92)ibc29. J0Z020ZPZ0OPZ1Z0ZRZ0Z024. ?cdhfgh(Page PL0ZPZ02PZPZ0APZ1ZKZ0Z0ZR8beh38ad Þ7efg8 Þ7ha(Page 352)b1. ?19cdiefgh(Page 405) Þa 0AbZ02PO0Z0ZRZ1Z0Z0Z0J08

Z0Z0ZQ20OqZ0ZPO1Z0Z0ZRZKbc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 375)bc30. ?1. ?diefg RZ0Z02PZ0Z0OPZ1ZBZ0Z0ZKcfgh(Page ZBZPZbZ3Z0Z0Z0Z02POpZ0ZPO1Z0A0ZRZK87ha(Page 75)b1. ?20cdhefg(Page 379)h Þa8 0O0Z020A0Z0OPO1ZRZ0ZRJ08

Z0Z0Z02PO0Z0OPO1Z0ZRZ0J0bc25. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 244)hbc1. ?27. ?diefg 0O0O02PZ0S0OBO1ZrM0Z0J0cfgh(Page 0Z0Z0Z3Z0Z0Z0O020Z0Z0O0O1Z0S0S0J087ha(Page 110)b1. ?21cdhefg(Page 398)h Þa8 0M0S02PZ0Z0OPO1Z0Z0S0J08

4951c21. ?defg7ha(Page 557)ibc1. ZBZR20Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0ZKZ01. ?cdhfgh(Page Z0ZBZNZ02PO0ZQOPO1S0Z0ZRJ08bei50adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 589)b15. ?22cdhefgh(Page 350) 0Z0OP20Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0ZqZ0Z08 Þa 0ZPZp2PZPL0Z0O1Z0Z0S0ZK8

Z0Z0Z02POPZ0ZPZ1ZKZRZ0ZRbc34. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 156)hbc1. 0Z0Z0Z02POPZBO0Z1S0A0J0MRb1. ?cdhefgh(Page j0ZKZ0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 359)b60.?23cdhefg(Page 291)h Þa8 0Z0Z020Z0Z0OPZ1Z0Z0Z0J08

Z0Z0Z020Z0orZ0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0abc18. ?defg8 Þ7ha(Page 241)hbc47. ?5830. ?cdhefgh(Page NZ0a0s020Z0ZQZPJ1ZRZ0ZRZ0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 280)b1. ?24cdiefgh(Page 117) BO0Z02PZ0Z0OPO1ZRZ0Z0J0bd608a BA0ZP2POPZ0ZPZ1S0Z0ZRJ08

Z0ZPZ02POPZ0Z0L1ZKZ0S0Z0bc11. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 333)hbc37. ?23. ?diefg 0Z0Zr2PZPZ0OPO1Z0Z0ZRJ0cfgh(Page oRZPZ0Z3Z0Z0Z0M02PO0L0ZPO1Z0Z0ZRZK87ha(Page 537)b1. ?25cdhefg(Page 394)h Þa8 BZ0Z02POPZ0OPO1S0Z0J0ZR8

O0ZPZP2PZ0Z0ZPZ1Z0Z0Z0J0abc1. ?dhefg8 Þ7ha(Page 261)bc1. ?h6641. ?cdhfgh(Page Z0Z0Z020O0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 235)bc1. ?26djefgh(Page 482) 0ZrZP20Z0Z0ZPZ1Z0Z0S0LKbe688ad 0ZNZ020ZPZ0OPJ1Z0Z0Z0Z08

Z0Z0O020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0bc26. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 371)hbc1. Z0OP2PZ0Z0O0J1Z0Z0Z0Z01. ?cdhfgh(Page ZPZ0A0Z020ZQZBOPO1Z0SRZ0J08bei70adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 103)b1. ?27cdhefg(Page 386)h Þa8 0S0Z020Z0Z0ZPO1Z0ZnZ0J08

7375bc1. 0Z0Z0Z020Z0Z0j0Z1Z0Z0ZBZ087ha(Page 246)ibc81. ?741. ?cdhefgh(Page 0Z0Z0O020Z0Z0OPZ1Z0Z0Z0Z0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 382)b1. ?28cdiefgh(Page 153) 0Z0Z02PZ0Z0OPO1S0Z0Z0J0bd768a Þa 0Z0Z020Z0Z0ZPO1Z0Z0LBZK8

Z0Z0Z02KZQZ0Z0Z1Z0Z0ZqMRbc18. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 95)hbc1. pZ0OPO020O0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0b1. ?cdhefgh(Page ZnO0Z0M020A0Z0ZPO1Z0Z0Z0J08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 259)b30. ?29cdhefgh(Page 114) Þa8 0ZNZ02PO0ZROPO1Z0Z0S0J08

Z0OnZ02PA0Z0Z0Z1J0ZRZ0ZRabc10. ?defg8 Þ7ha(Page 336)hbc30. ?18. ?dhgh(Page Z0Z0Z02PO0Z0ZPO1Z0Z0L0J0efg8 Þ7ha(Page 339)b1. ?30cdiefgh(Page 100) 0Z0ZP2PO0Z0OPZ1S0A0S0J0cf848beh82ad 0A0Z02POPZ0OPO1S0ZQJ0ZR8

Z0Z0O02PZ0ZPOBO1S0Z0ZRJ0abc21. ?defg8 Þ7ha(Page 540)hbc1. ?h8622. ?cdhfgh(Page ZRZQOq2PO0Z0O0O1Z0S0ZNZKefg8 Þ7ha(Page 282)b1. ?31cdiefgh(Page 354) 0Z0O02PA0ZQOBO1S0Z0Z0J0be888ad 0ZQZP2PO0Z0OPZ1Z0Z0Z0J08

8991bc1. 0Z0Z0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z08ha(Page 161)ibc1. ?h901. ?cdiefg 0ZPZ020Z0Z0Z0S1Z0ZBA0SKbefgh(Page 200)928ad 0O0lb20A0L0ZBZ1Z0S0Z0J087ha(Page 120)b1. ?32cdiefg(Page 400)h Þa 0Z0Z020OPZ0Z0O1Z0Z0Z0Z08

M0Z0O020A0ZQZ0O1S0Z0ZRZKbc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 388)bc22. ZpO0ZP20ZqZ0OPZ1Z0ZRZKZ0b44. ?cdhefgh(Page 3Z0ZBS0L020ZPA0OPO1S0Z0Z0J08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 542)b1. ?33cdhefg(Page 321)h Þa8 BZ0S020O0Z0lPO1Z0S0Z0ZK8

9799abc25. ?defg Z0Z02PO0Z0OPO1Z0S0S0J087ha(Page 426)ibc22. ?igh(Page 3Z0A0Z0Z020Z0Z0ZPZ1Z0Z0Z0J087ha(Page 652)b1. ?34cdiefgh(Page 564) Þ34. ?d 0o0Z020ZrZ0ZPO1ZRZRZ0J0cf1008beh98ad bL0OP2PO0A0sBZ1ZNZ0S0SK8

Z0O0Z0O020Z0Z0O0Z1Z0ZQZ0J0bc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 344)bc1. Z0Z0Z0Z02PO0Z0ObO1Z0S0J0ZRb1. ?cdhefgh(Page 3ZPZPZQO020OPZ0OBO1S0Z0Z0J08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 264)b19. ?35cdhefgh(Page 342) Þa8 BZqZ02PZ0Z0OPO1Z0ZRS0J08

105 sNO020ZRSnmBJ1Z0Z0Z0Z087ab1. ?cdiefgh(Page 660)36

0.2. Endgame 0Z0Z0Z3Z0Z0Z0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0bc1. ?defg Þ7ha(Page 70)hbc1. Z0Z0Z0j02bZ0Z0Z0a1Z0Z0Z0ZKb1. ?cdjefgh(Page 3Z0Z0Z0j02PZ0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z08adefg8 Þ7ha(Page 529)b1. ?37cdhefg(Page 484)h Þa8 0Z0aP20Z0Z0ZPZ1Z0S0Z0ZK8

Z0Z0A0Z020Z0Z0Z0Z1Z0Z0Z0Z0bc1. ?dhefg Þ7ha(Page 476)bc1. ?h1110Z0Z0Z0Z7Z0Z0J0Z060Z0Z0Z0Z5Z0Zpj0Z040

Chess Combinations A collection of combinations from actual chess games and endgame studies Umesh P. Narendran 1

Related Documents:

a chess teacher, Vladimir Pafuutieff, said to me, "Chess Combinations are the punch in chess. You have to develop your chess skills by understanding combinations. Virtually every chess game has a chess combination. You have to learn to recognize when a combination is available and you must land the blow! If you do this you will win a lot of .

UNCLASSIFIED PEO EIS 2 Agenda CHESS Organization Relation to PEO EIS, ASA(ALT) and HQDA CIO/G-6 CHESS Organizational Structure CHESS Operational Concept CHESS Authority CHESS Statement of Non-Availability (SoNA) CHESS IT e-mart SharePoint License Tracker System (LTS) CHESS Training CHESS Business/Contracts Report

Comparing Solitaire Chess to Standard Chess: Solitaire Chess is a single-player logic puzzle, not a chess game. Recreational mathematicians classify it as a “chess task,” meaning that it uses the rules of chess with appropriate adaptations. With Solitaire Chess, the basic piece movements are the same as with standard chess.

Millions of chess games have been recorded from the very beginning of chess history to the last tournaments of top chess players. Meanwhile chess engines have continuously improved up to the point they cannot only beat world chess champion

109 Chess Endgame Study - A Comprehensive Introduction, The Roycroft 1972 370 pb 110 Chess Endings: Essential Knowledge Averbakh 1966 135 pb 111 Chess Exam and Training Guide: Tactics Khmelnitsky 2007 207 pb 112 Chess For Beginners Horowitz 1950 132 pb 113 Chess For Fun & Chess For Blood Lasker 1942 224 pb

When the elderly play chess, a robotic chess system including a simple and low-cost camera and a small robotic arm can be used to implement an automatic chess-placing system to help the elderly place the chessmen and reduce some chores. People may even play chess with a chess robot that includes the robotic chess system and software for playing.

Chess Endings The goals in the endgame are: 1. To checkmate the opponent’s King 2. To promote a pawn to help achieve goal 1. . When you are training chess tactics and chess combinations by solving numerous chess puzzles, seek to understand the elements in the ches

Andreas Wagner1, Wolfgang Wiedemann1, Thomas Wunderlich1 1 Chair of Geodesy, Faculty of Civil, Geo and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, a.wagner@tum.de .