Towards Inclusive A Necessary Process Of Transformation

3y ago
361 Views
2 Downloads
911.80 KB
80 Pages
Last View : 8d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nixon Dill
Transcription

Towards inclusiveeducation:A necessary processof transformationBy Dr Kathy CologonDepartment of Educational Studies,Macquarie UniversityFor Children and Young Peoplewith Disability AustraliaOctober 2019

Suggested citationCologon, K. (2019) Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation. Reportwritten by Dr Kathy Cologon, Macquarie Universityfor Children and Young People with DisabilityAustralia (CYDA)ISBN: ISBN-13: 978-0-646-80949-6AcknowledgementsChildren and Young People with Disability andDr Kathy Cologon would like to acknowledge thetraditional custodians of the lands on which thisreport has been written, reviewed and produced,whose cultures and customs have nurtured andcontinue to nurture this land since the Dreamtime.We pay our respects to their Elders past, presentand future. This is, was, and always will beAboriginal land.We would like to express our thanks to AssociateProfessor Bob Jackson, Professor Sally Robinson,and Dr Zinnia Mevawalla who provided peer reviewsfor this manuscript. The thoughtful, comprehensiveand helpful reviews were useful in strengtheningthis work.This activity received grant funding from theAustralian Government.

ContentsChapter 1 Towards inclusive education: An introduction2Chapter 2 The outcomes of inclusive education7Chapter 3 Defining inclusive education16Chapter 4 Illusions of inclusion26Chapter 5 Uncovering ableism in education34Chapter 6 Broken promises and further barriers to inclusion38Chapter 7 ‘Un-othering’: transformation towards inclusion42References 56Inclusiveeducationinvolves valuingand facilitating thefull participation andbelonging of everyone inall aspects of our educationcommunities andsystems.Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation1

chapterONETowards inclusiveeducation:An introduction2Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation

Inclusive education involves valuing andfacilitating the full participation and belongingof everyone in all aspects of our educationcommunities and systems.No one is excluded as supports for inclusion areembedded within everyday educational practices.1Inclusive education is about everyone learning together,in all our diversity. This means that everyone has genuineopportunities to learn together, with support as needed,and all students are meaningfully involved in all aspectsof the curriculum, thus making inclusion a sharedexperience.2 There is no ‘type’ of student ‘eligible’(nor ‘ineligible’) for inclusion – inclusion is about, withand for all of us. Inclusive education involves upholdingthe dignity of each student in belonging, participating andaccessing ongoing opportunities, recognising and valuingthe contribution that each student makes, and supportingevery student to flourish.3There is no ‘other’ in inclusion. At its core, inclusionrequires recognising and acting upon the realisationthat there is no ‘them’ and ‘us’. There is only ‘us’, andthus an ‘us’ to which, in our diversities, we all belong.This understanding of our shared humanity is fundamentalto bringing about inclusive education.4Recognising our shared humanity does not in any wayinfer ‘sameness’. Inclusion is not about pretending thatwe are all the same. A focus on sameness involvesprocesses of assimilation, which are not only contrary to,but form a serious barrier to, inclusion.5 Instead, inclusionis about valuing, celebrating and sharing our differencesas we embrace every aspect of the complexity ofhuman diversities and recognise that we are allequal in our ‘differentness’.6To be inclusive requires directly and actively rejectingcommon myths of ‘normal’ or ‘typical’ ways of thinking,being and doing, and recognising that education needs tobe open and responsive to the vast range of ‘differences’among humans. This is not to deny the many sharedways of being, but rather to identify that there is neveronly one way – or one ‘right’ way – to develop or ‘be’.Rather than creating systems and practices for whicheach person must shape themselves or be shapedto fit – or else be excluded – education systems andpedagogies need to be transformed to be open to, value,and be shaped for the many ways of being human.There is no‘type’ of student‘eligible’ (nor ‘ineligible’)for inclusion – inclusionis about, with andfor all of us.Background and methodIn 2013 Children and Young People with DisabilityAustralia (then Children with Disability Australia) publishedan extensive systematic literature review examining theevidence base for inclusive education.7 That review wasintended to provide a firm basis from which to informresearch-based advocacy and policy development. Insum, the findings were that while it was clearly establishedthat all people have the right to an inclusive education,and that when inclusive education occurs the outcomesare positive for everyone involved, there remained manyongoing barriers to the realisation of this right in the livedexperience of students and families.Current efforts towards inclusion are impeded bya lack of understanding of inclusive education andfrequent misappropriation and co-opting of the term.Additional barriers include negative and discriminatoryattitudes and practices, the lack of a clear and genuinenational commitment to inclusive education, insufficientsupport to facilitate inclusive education, and inadequateeducation and professional development in inclusiveeducation for teachers and other professionals.Critical to addressing these barriers is recognising anddisestablishing ableism at all levels of education systemsand settings.8 Ableism, which is examined in detail inchapter five, is a term increasingly used to describe theprocess by which people are excluded and viewed andtreated as ‘not one of us’. The term ‘ableism’ is used inthe same way as ‘racism’ and ‘sexism’ to describe theprocess of negatively stereotyping individuals or groupson the basis of a perceived ‘difference’ and, often,discriminating based on such stereotypes at individualand systemic levels.9 Using the term ‘ableism’ creates aTowards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation3

1 Towards inclusive education: An introductionspace to enable the often-subconscious processof devaluing those of us who experience ‘disability’to be called out and held up to conscious scrutinyas a starting point for disestablishing ableism.This review of the research, in keeping with all otherexisting reviews and meta-analyses dating back overmany decades10, reveals a consistent lack of evidenceto suggest any benefit of segregated education.By contrast, a considerable body of research wasidentified demonstrating the benefits of inclusiveeducation. Despite these well-known findings, whichhave been persistent for more than half a century,current research nationally and internationally showsthat segregated education not only continues butis increasing.11Building on the research base for inclusive educationoutlined in the first edition, this second edition consistsof an extensive systematic literature review. It examinesevidence across six decades and incorporates morethan 400 research papers, relevant treaties andreports, to further explore the existing barriers andthe possibilities for addressing these to bring aboutthe realisation of inclusive education.It should be noted that there are many furtherpressing issues that are important to inclusiveeducation that fall outside the scope of this presentedition. However, this is not to suggest that thesematters are unimportant. There are a number of gapsin the literature identified within, and further researchis urgently needed to address these gaps.The research that is examined within this reportaddresses the outcomes of inclusive educationfor all students. This includes students with a widerange of disability labels, including students labelledwith ‘severe’, ‘profound’ and ‘multiple’ ‘disabilities’.Given the frequent misperception that the researchevidence does not concern ‘some’ students, it isimportant to make it clear at the outset that thisreport addresses the evidence regarding studentsacross the full range of labels. Inclusive educationis about all students, not only some.4Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformationIt is also important from the outset to recognise the manystudents, families, teachers, educators, paraprofessionaleducators, principals, directors, education departmentstaff and others who work tirelessly every day to supportinclusive education. There are many challenges andraising the issues identified within the research should notbe read as a criticism of individuals; rather, it is an attemptto draw to light important issues that require carefulconsideration if inclusive education is to become a realityin Australia.What has changed since we first did this work?In the time since the publication of the first editionin 2013, there have been a range of relevant inquiriesand reports within Australia, along with a host ofrecommendations and a number of relevant policychanges. Additionally, the United Nations Committeeon the Rights of Persons with Disabilities has producedGeneral Comment 4 (GC4), which explains Article 24 ofthe Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities(CRPD) on Inclusive Education.12 The CRPD articulatesthe rights of people who experience disability and clearlystates that these rights are not optional nor privileges.As outlined in chapter three, despite the frequent andongoing confusion around the term, and looseinterpretation and application13, ‘inclusive education’has been unambiguously defined in GC4. The adventof GC4 is one of many efforts towards bringing inclusiveeducation to a reality in the time since the first edition.Nonetheless, it unfortunately remains the case that theright to a full and inclusive education is not affordedto many children and young people who experiencedisability, and serious and ongoing violations of the rightsof children and young people continue.14 Given thepositive impact of genuine inclusive education, thishighlights the need for continued advocacy and policychange in this area.15The once radical notion of inclusive education has beenso ‘tamed’ and ‘domesticated’ that ‘special’ educationis now often misrepresented as ‘inclusive education’.16And yet, in a simultaneous contradiction, it seems thatthe lines between proponents of segregated and inclusiveeducation have been, perhaps even more boldly, drawnin the sand. However, there is no equality in segregation.The myth of ‘separate but equal’ was debunked throughthe civil rights movement in North America in the 1950s –

famously through successful litigation intended to end‘racially’-based segregated education in Brown v Boardof Education of Topeka (347 US 483, 1954). It is morethan time to extend that recognition to all children andyoung people who experience disability, including allthose constructed as disabled through disproportionaterepresentation of people belonging to other minoritygroups within ‘special’ education.17 For example, theoverrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanderpeoples in special education.18Nearly six years on from the publication of the first edition,the research evidence brings us to the same overallconclusion: inclusive education has positive benefitsfor everyone. And yet, barriers continue to prevent itsrealisation for many children and young people throughoutAustralia and across the world.19 To bring about thepromise of inclusive education requires substantialchange. Inclusive education is not a process of relabellingpast practices and systems. As Slee argues, “ inclusiveeducation is a call for a reformulation of schooling wherein‘special’ and ‘regular’ are jettisoned and the segregationof students with disabilities is seen as a relic of a bygoneage”. 20 The time for this change is upon us.An overview of this reportThere are many key considerations in understandinginclusive education and the evidence base supporting it.In this report some of the most pressing issues areexplored in light of the existing research literature. Whileit is not possible in one volume to address all the criticalissues involved in the realisation of inclusive education,the focus areas in this report are intended to provide aclear understanding of what inclusive education is andwhy it is important, and to explore key factors in realisingthe right to education for all.inclusion and the impact of presenting segregation asinclusion. To address the key barriers to inclusion thatare clearly identified within the research, consciousdisestablishment of ableism is required. Consequently, inchapter five, I examine ableism in education and considerthe implications in progressing towards genuine inclusionwithin and beyond education settings and systems. Inchapter six I unpack the concepts of macro and microexclusion to support a deeper understanding of inclusionand exclusion in practice. Finally, in chapter seven,I draw together the research evidence to identify a seriesof policy recommendations and steps for moving forwardtowards the transformation required to bring aboutinclusive education in reality.The report is developed sequentially, thus it works wellto read from start to finish. However, each chapter isalso presented in such a way as to enable it to be readindependently. In this way it is my hope that you, thereader, can dip in and out as is most helpful to you at anygiven point in time. Inclusion is a journey; we never fullyarrive as we can always become more inclusive. Bringingabout genuine inclusive education is often challenging andtakes commitment and ongoing efforts. At the same time,inclusion is lived out in everyday moments and, in thatsense, is often easy and is also natural. Much like the‘project’ of making a life out of our existence, engaging inthe ‘project’ of inclusion requires starting from where weare now and moving forward, one step at a time. We canalways be more inclusive, but we can also always find theways in which we are, or are ready to be, inclusive rightnow. That is our starting point. From wherever you arestarting, I hope you will find this report helpful in yourjourney towards inclusion.In this chapter, I have provided a brief rationale andoverview to set the context for this report. In chapter twoI present the research evidence regarding the outcomesof inclusive education. In the subsequent chapters,I engage with some of the key barriers that are currentlypreventing the realisation of inclusive education. To do so,in chapter three I begin with an in-depth considerationof common myths and confusions, and address whatinclusive education actually means. I then explore thisfurther in chapter four, in light of the current illusions ofTowards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation5

1 Towards inclusive education: An introduction1 UN General Assembly, 20162 Ibid3 Agbenyega & Klibthong, 2014; Cologon, 2014a4 Cologon, 2014b5 Slee, 20016 Bevan-Brown, 2013; Cologon, 2014b; Lalvani, & Bacon,20197 Cologon, 2013a8 Ableism, which is examined in detail in chapter five, involvesan ‘othering’ process through which a stigmatised ‘them’ iscreated in contrast to a superior ‘us’ through the constructionof a ‘normal’ and valued person and an ‘inferior other’.9 Cologon, & Thomas, 201410 For example, see: Australian Research Alliance for Children &Youth (ARACY), 2013; Calberg, & Kavale, 1980; Dunn, 1968;Hehir, Grindal, Freeman, Lamoreau, Borquaye, & Burke,2016; Jackson, 2008; SWIFT Center, 2017; Wang, & Baker,198511 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW), 2017;Anderson, & Boyle, 2015; Graham, & Sweller, 2011;Guldberg, Parsons, MacLeod, Jones, Prunty, & Balfe, 2011;Shaw, 2017; Valle, Connor, Broderick, A. Bejoian, & Baglieri,201112 UN General Assembly, 201613 D’Alessio, Grima-Farrell, & Cologon, 201814 Brede, Remington, Kenny, Warren, & Pellicano, 2017;Children and Young People with Disability Australia (CYDA),2017; Poed, Cologon, & Jackson, 2017; UNESCO Institutefor Statistics (UIS) and UNICEF, 201515 Cologon & Salvador, 2016; Iacono, Keeffe, Kenny, &McKinstry, 2019; Mackenzie, Cologon, & Fenech, 201616 D’Alessio, Grima-Farrell, & Cologon, 201817 Annamma, 2018; Cooc & Kiru, 2018; Coutinho & Oswald,2000; Graham, 2012; Hosp & Reschly, 200418 Graham, 201219 Filmer, 2008; Jelas, & Ali, 2014; UNESCO, 201320 Slee, 2018a, p. 826Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation

chaptertwoThe outcomesof inclusiveeducationTowards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformation7

2 The outcomes of inclusive education“ Inclusive education can now be justifiedas an approach supported philosophically,in international declarations, and empiricallythrough research on its efficacy.”21In this chapter, I outline the evidence base on theoutcomes of inclusive education. When consideringthese outcomes there are a number of challenges.Discriminatory attitudes and practices pose seriousbarriers to research into inclusive education. Manyresearch studies, purporting to examine inclusiveeducation, in reality explore practices of segregationand exclusion22 (micro or macro23). For that reason,in reviewing the research in this chapter, terms like‘mainstream education’ are used. In progressinginclusive education there is a strong need to moveto genuine and full inclusive education, and forthis to be reflected in all research. Additionally,as a consequence of a myriad of factors, educationsettings frequently engage in reactive responses tothe enrolment of students who experience disability,rather than proactively in processes of transformationfor inclusion of all students.24 Despite these issues, aconsiderable and growing body of research evidencesupports inclusive education.25In addition to positive outcomes for social justice andsense of community and belonging, research providesevidence of positive outcomes of inclusive educationfor social, academic, communication and physicaldevelopment in students who do and do notexperience disability. Inclusive education has alsobeen found to have additional benefits for not onlylearning but also maintaining and generalising learningbetween and across settings compared withsegregated education settings.26The 2016 systematic review of the evidence forinclusive education by Harvard academic ThomasHehir and his colleagues concluded “there is clear andconsistent evidence that inclusive educational settingscan confer substantial short- and long-term benefitsfor students with and without disabilities”.27 Similarly,consistent with findings over more than half a century,in a recent study Cole and colleagues find clearacademic benefits of inclusive education.288Towards inclusive education:A necessary process of transformationDecadesof researchdemonstrates thatinclusive education hasbenefits for the academic,communication, positivebehavioural and socialdevelopment of studentslabelled with ‘severe’and ‘multiple’‘disabilities’.Additionally, in a 2017 meta-analysis, Szumski andcolleagues found positive academic benefits of inclusiveeducation for students who do not experience disability,at all levels of schooling.29 For students who do notexperience disability, research finds that inclusiveeducation results in: enhanced learning opportunities andexperiences; education that is more sensitive to differingstudent needs; growth in interpersonal skills and greateracceptance and understanding of human diversity; andincreased flexibility and adaptability.30 Furthermore,inclusive education has benefits for teachers in the formof improved teaching practices, with all the benefits thatentails.31 Nonetheless, segregated schooling is not onlycontinuing, but also increasing.32Troublingly, there is a common belief that educationis really only for ‘some people’, and thus that there are‘some people’ who are ‘too disabled’ to be included.Unsurprisingly, this common misperception goes handin hand w

interpretation and application13, ‘inclusive education’ has been unambiguously defined in GC4. The advent of GC4 is one of many efforts towards bringing inclusive education to a reality in the time since the first edition. Nonetheless, it unfortunately remains the case that the right to a full and inclusive education is not afforded

Related Documents:

Towards inclusive education in Finland . Key words in Finnish basic education . framework of inclusive education but it still consists of . co-operative literature clubs concerning inclusive settings case study analyses and after the meetings with parents

We tailored the ‘Attitude Towards Inclusive Education Scale’ (ATIES) developed by Wilczenski [20] to a 22 statements survey, named as Attitude Towards Inclusive Education in India Scale (ATIEIS, Appendix 1). The original ATIES scale has 16 statements to be ranked on a Likert scale (1 -strongly disagree to 5 - strongly agree).

The 5 Disciplines of Inclusive Leaders 05 Inclusive leadership is not just about diversity and inclusion Figure 1: The business case for inclusive leadership. Inclusive leaders drive organizational growth in the 21st century. Biggest challenge: create growth. To have growth you need

Working towards inclusive physical education in a primary school: ‘some days I just don’t get it right’ Background In Aotearoa New Zealand, as it is internationally, there is a desire to ensure physical education is inclusive of all students regardless of their abilities. Yet medical

Towards Inclusive Education: A Case Study of IGNOU S.V.S. Chaudhury1, Pankaj Khare1, Sanjay Gupta1 and Suresh Garg2 1Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India 2 Himalayan University, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India Abstract:Towards the end of the Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007 -2012), India catered to about 20

akuntansi musyarakah (sak no 106) Ayat tentang Musyarakah (Q.S. 39; 29) لًََّز ãَ åِاَ óِ îَخظَْ ó Þَْ ë Þٍجُزَِ ß ا äًَّ àَط لًَّجُرَ íَ åَ îظُِ Ûاَش

Collectively make tawbah to Allāh S so that you may acquire falāḥ [of this world and the Hereafter]. (24:31) The one who repents also becomes the beloved of Allāh S, Âَْ Èِﺑاﻮَّﺘﻟاَّﺐُّ ßُِ çﻪَّٰﻠﻟانَّاِ Verily, Allāh S loves those who are most repenting. (2:22

ASME A17.1-2019/CSA B44:19 (Revision of ASME A17.1-2016/CSA B44-16) Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators. Includes Requirements for Elevators, Escalators, Dumbwaiters, Moving Walks, Material Lifts, and Dumbwaiters With Automatic Transfer Devices. AN AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD. ASME A17.1-2019/CSA B44:19 (Revision of ASME A17.1-2016/CSA B44-16) Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators x .