UFC 3-260-04 Airfield And Heliport Marking

2y ago
44 Views
2 Downloads
2.26 MB
136 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Joanna Keil
Transcription

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)AIRFIELD AND HELIPORT MARKINGAPPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)AIRFIELD AND HELIPORT MARKINGAny copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of thecopyright holder.U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERSNAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMANDAIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER (Preparing Activity)Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ . /1/)Change No.DateLocationThis UFC supersedes Air Force ETL 04-2, Standard Airfield Pavement MarkingSchemes, 19 July 2004; Army TM 5-823-4 C1, Marking of Army Airfield-HeliportOperational and Maintenance Facilities, July 1987; UFC 3-260-05A, Marking ofArmy Airfield Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, 16 January 2004;Army Engineering and Construction Bulletin, Marking of Army Airfields andHeliports, 1 October 2012; and Army ETL 1110-3-512, Army Airfield and HeliportMarkings, 30 September 2015.

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018FOREWORDThe Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and providesplanning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and appliesto the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordancewith USD (AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects andwork for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is alsogoverned by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded ConstructionAgreements (HNFA), and, in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA.)Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the most stringent of the UFC, theSOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available tousers as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for militaryconstruction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval FacilitiesEngineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) areresponsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact thepreparing Service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC isthe responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supportingrationale should be sent to the respective Service proponent office by the following electronicform: Criteria Change Request. The form is also accessible from the Internet site listed below.UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the followingsource: Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.Refer to UFC 1-200-01, DoD Building Code (General Building Requirements), forimplementation of new issuances on projects.AUTHORIZED BY:LARRY D. McCALLISTER, PhD, PE,PMP, SESChief, Engineering and ConstructionDirectorate of Civil WorksU.S. Army Corps of EngineersEDWIN H. OSHIBA, SESDirector, AF Civil Engineer CenterJOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.Chief EngineerNaval Facilities Engineering CommandMICHAEL McANDREWDeputy Assistant Secretary of Defense(Facilities Investment and Management)Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense(Energy, Installations, and Environment)

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEETDocument: UFC 3-260-04, Airfield and Heliport MarkingSuperseding: Air Force Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 04-2, Standard AirfieldPavement Marking Schemes, 19 July 2004; Army TM 5-823-4 C1, Marking of ArmyAirfield-Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, July 1987; UFC 3-260-05A,Marking of Army Airfield Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, 16 January2004; and Army Engineering and Construction Bulletin, Marking of Army Airfields andHeliports, 1 October 2012, and Army ETL 1110-3-512, Army Airfield and HeliportMarkings, 30 September 2015Description: The purpose of this document is to provide standard dimensions, colors,retro-reflectivity requirements, layout, placement, and orientation standards for markingairfield pavements. It gives the minimum level of marking necessary for paved surfacesof fixed and rotary wing runways, taxiways, helipads, and landing lanes. It also providesauthority to mark hazards to air navigation as obstructions in accordance with nationalstandards or military agreements within host countries. See TM 3-34.48-2, Theater ofOperations: Roads, Airfields, and Heliports – Airfield and Heliport Design, Volume II, forlanding zone marking requirements. This document applies to all Department ofDefense (DoD) activities except those operating at airports owned and controlled by anauthority other than the DoD. For airports under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)jurisdiction, use FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5340-1, Standards for AirportMarkings. For DoD facilities overseas, if a written agreement exists between the hostnation and DoD that requires application of North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO),International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), or FAA standards, those standardsapply as stipulated within the agreement. For cases where a Status of ForcesAgreement (SOFA) specifically requires international standards, use ICAO Annex 14,Volume I, Aerodromes (for fixed wing runways), or Annex 14, Volume II, Heliports (forrotary wing helipads and runways), as appropriate. Air Force tenant organizations oncivil airports use these standards on the military portion of the airfield to the maximumextent practicable.Reasons for Document: This document combines and consolidates standards for theServices to ensure uniformity in visual guidance aids on DoD airfields.Impact: Impacts of implementing these updated standards have been minimized byallowing existing markings to remain pending a need to remark pavement due to age ornormal wear.Unification Issues: Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) is the Office of PrimaryResponsibility for airfield marking on U.S. Navy facilities. The NAVAIR standard isNAVAIR 51-50AAA-2, General Requirements for Shore Based Airfield Marking andLighting. Additionally, the NAVAIR publication includes airfield lighting standards whichare not unified with UFC 3-535-01, Visual Air Navigation Facilities. The PavementsDiscipline Working Group (DWG) continues to work with NAVAIR to unify airfieldmarking standards across DoD. Waiver processing differs among the Services due todifferences in organizational structure.

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018TABLE OF CONTENTSCHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND GENERAL INFORMATION . 11-1BACKGROUND. . 11-2GENERAL INFORMATION. . 11-3PURPOSE AND SCOPE. . 11-4APPLICABILITY. . 11-5JOINT USE FACILITIES. . 21-5.1Within the Continental United States (CONUS). . 21-5.2Outside the Continental United States (OCONUS). . 21-6GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS. . 21-7REFERENCES. . 21-8SUMMARY OF BEST PRACTICES IN APPENDIX B. . 31-8.1Airfield Marking Handbook. . 31-8.2Maintenance of Marking Patterns from Previous Standards. . 31-8.3Use of Metrics for Markings. . 31-9GLOSSARY. . 3CHAPTER 2 WAIVERS . 52-1REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES. . 5CHAPTER 3 TOLERANCES, MATERIALS, APPLICATION RATES, AND COLORS . 73-1PATTERN SIZE ALLOWANCES. . 73-1.1Tolerances for New Markings and Remarking. . 73-1.2Paint. . 73-1.3Alternate Marking Materials. . 83-1.4Alternate Visual Aids. . 83-1.5Contrasting Markings to Increase Conspicuity. . 83-1.6Obliteration of Extraneous Markings. . 83-2COLORS FOR PAVEMENT AND OBSTRUCTION MARKINGS. . 93-2.1Airfields and Roadways. . 93-2.2Colors for Marking Obstructions. . 103-3RETRO-REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS. . 103-3.1Painted Pavement Markings. . 103-3.2Post Applied Retro-Reflective Media. . 103-3.3Material Selection. . 10i

UFC 3-260-0416 May 20183-3.4Lifecycle Cost Analysis . 11CHAPTER 4 UNIQUE MARKING PRACTICES . 134-1PRACTICES FOR SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES. . 134-2OPEN GRADED WEARING SURFACES AND CLEANING EXISTINGMARKINGS. . 134-2.1Painting Porous Pavements. . 134-2.2Cleaning Markings. . 134-3MAXIMUM PAINT THICKNESS. . 134-4OBSTRUCTION MARKING. . 134-5ROADWAY MARKING. . 14CHAPTER 5 RUNWAY MARKINGS . 155-1GENERAL INFORMATION. . 155-2RUNWAY MARKING SCHEMES. . 155-2.1Runway Marking Elements Based on Highest Intended Use. . 155-2.2Additional Markings. . 155-2.3Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) Runways. . 155-2.4Basic Visual Flight Rule (VFR) Runway. . 165-2.5Non-Precision Instrument Runways. . 165-2.6Precision Instrument Runway. . 205-2.7Runway Marking Precedence. . 205-2.8Runway Centerline. . 205-2.9Threshold Marking. . 225-2.10Runway Designations. . 235-2.11Dimensions for Designation Numbers and Letters. . 245-2.12Runway Overruns. . 245-2.13Runway Side Stripes. . 275-2.14Displaced Threshold Marking Schemes. . 275-2.15Touchdown Zone and Fixed Distance Markings. . 34CHAPTER 6 TAXIWAY AND APRON MARKINGS . 376-1GENERAL INFORMATION. . 376-2TAXIWAY AND TAXILANE CENTERLINE STRIPE. . 376-2.1Directional Changes. . 376-2.2Taxiway and Taxilane Turn Radii. . 376-3TAXIWAY, APRON, AND TAXILANE EDGE STRIPES. . 38ii

UFC 3-260-0416 May 20186-3.1Taxiway and Apron Edge Stripes. . 386-3.2Taxilane Edge Stripes. . 386-4PARKING STOP BARS. . 406-5HOLDING POSITIONS. . 436-5.1Runway Hold Positions. . 436-5.2Runway/Runway Holding Position Marking Layout and Placement. . 496-5.3Enhanced Hold Position Marking. . 496-5.4Intermediate Hold Position Markings. . 496-5.5Surface Painted Signs. . 526-5.6Surface Painted Holding Position Signs. . 536-5.7Surface Painted Taxiway Location Signs. . 556-5.8Surface Painted Taxiway Direction Signs. . 556-5.9Towway Markings. . 616-5.10Restricted Area and Restricted Area Entry Control Points (ECP). . 63CHAPTER 7 MARKING PAVEMENTS FOR ROTARY WING OPERATIONS . 657-1GENERAL. . 657-2MARKING WITH PAINT OR THERMOPLASTICS. . 657-3COLORS AND REFLECTIVITY OF MARKINGS. . 657-4PAVEMENT CURING TIME AND APPLICATION RATES. . 657-4.1Rigid Pavements. . 657-4.2Flexible pavements. . 657-5INCREASING VISIBILITY OF MARKINGS. . 667-6HELICOPTER RUNWAY AND LANDING LANE MARKINGS. . 667-6.1Rotary-Wing Runway Designator. . 667-6.2Azimuth Runway Designation Marking. . 667-6.3Runway Centerline Marking. . 677-6.4Runway Side Stripe (Edge) Marking. . 677-7TAXIWAY MARKINGS. . 717-7.1Centerline Marking. . 717-7.2Hold-Line Marking. . 717-8HOVERPOINTS. . 717-9APRON MARKINGS. . 737-10HELIPADS. . 73iii

UFC 3-260-0416 May 20187-10.1Hospital Helipad Markings. . 737-10.2Elevated Helipad Markings. . 737-10.3Application. . 797-10.4Location. . 797-11OVERRUNS AND SHOULDER MARKINGS. . 797-11.1General. . 797-11.2Color. . 797-11.3Materials. . 797-11.4Overrun Areas. . 797-11.5Runway Shoulder Areas. . 80CHAPTER 8 OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS . 878-1CLOSED PAVEMENT MARKINGS. . 878-2PERMANENTLY CLOSED RUNWAYS. . 878-2.1Runway Markings. . 878-2.2Intersections. . 878-3PERMANENTLY CLOSED TAXIWAYS OR TAXILANES. . 878-4PERMANENTLY CLOSED APRONS. . 888-5TEMPORARILY CLOSED AIRFIELD PAVEMENTS. . 888-5.1Temporarily Closed Runways. . 888-5.2Temporarily Closed Taxiways or Taxilanes. . 888-5.3Temporarily Closed Aprons. . 888-6BARRICADES. . 918-7NON-MOVEMENT AREA BOUNDARY MARKING. . 938-7.1Location. . 938-7.2Layout. . 938-8OBSTRUCTION CLEARANCE LINE. . 938-9DECEPTIVE SURFACES (SHOULDER MARKINGS). . 958-10RUNWAY SHOULDERS. . 958-11TAXIWAY AND APRON SHOULDERS. . 958-12VEHICULAR ACCESS MARKING. . 958-13INERTIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM (INS) CHECKPOINT MARKINGS. . 958-14GROUND RECEIVER CHECKPOINT MARKINGS. . 968-15COMPASS CALIBRATION PAD (CCP) MARKINGS. . 101iv

UFC 3-260-0416 May 20188-16T-6 PROPELLER HAZARD PAVEMENT MARKINGS. . 1038-17F-16 ENGINE INLET DANGER AREA PAVEMENT MARKINGS. . 1038-18HYDRANT FUEL PIT LID MARKING. . 1038-19STATIC GROUND MARKINGS. . 1038-20C-12 PROP HAZARD WARNING MARKING. . 1048-21EXPEDIENT AIRFIELD MARKINGS. . 104APPENDIX A REFERENCES . 109APPENDIX B BEST PRACTICES . 113APPENDIX C GLOSSARY . 121FIGURESFigure 5-1 Runway Marking Schemes . 17Figure 5-2. VFR Runway Markings . 18Figure 5-3. Non-Precision Instrument Runway Markings . 19Figure 5-4. Touchdown Zone and Fixed Distance (Aiming Point) Markings . 21Figure 5-5. UAS Runway Markings . 22Figure 5-6 Runway Designators . 25Figure 5-7. Overrun Markings . 26Figure 5-8 Permanently Displaced Threshold Where Preceding Pavement is Usedas Runway (Take-Off or Landing) . 30Figure 5-9. Permanently Displaced Threshold Where Preceding Pavement is Usedas a Taxiway . 31Figure 5-10. Permanently Displaced Threshold Where Displacement Area is Usedas a Taxiway and for Take-Off and/or Landing Ground Roll . 32Figure 5-11. Temporarily Displaced Threshold . 33Figure 5-12. Aircraft Arresting System (AAS) Warning Markings . 35Figure 6-1. Typical Taxiway and Taxilane Markings . 39Figure 6-2. Typical Mass Apron Layout for Cargo Aircraft . 42Figure 6-3. VFR Hold Position Markings . 44Figure 6-4. ILS Hold Position Details . 46Figure 6-5. Locating Instrument Hold Position to Protect Glideslope Critical Area 47Figure 6-6. Locating Instrument Hold Positions to Protect Touchdown Zone CriticalArea . 48Figure 6-7. Enhanced Hold Position Markings . 50v

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018Figure 6-8. Intermediate Holding Position Marking . 51Figure 6-9. Taxilane Edge Stripes . 52Figure 6-10. Surface Painted Runway Hold Position Signs . 54Figure 6-11. Surface Painted Taxiway Location Sign . 57Figure 6-12. Surface Painted Taxiway Direction Sign . 58Figure 6-13. Surface Painted Sign Inscription Layout, A through P . 59Figure 6-14. Surface Painted Sign Inscription Layout, Q through 6 . 60Figure 6-15. Surface Painted Sign Inscription Layout, 7 through 0 and DirectionalArrow . 61Figure 6-16 Towway Centerline Marking . 62Figure 6-17. Restricted Area Entry Control Points (ECP) . 63Figure 6-18. Typical Restricted Area Boundary Warning Sign . 64Figure 7-1. Helicopter Runway Markings . 68Figure 7-2. Rotary-Wing Designator and Designation Markings . 69Figure 7-3. Rotary-Wing Runway Designation Numbers and Letters . 70Figure 7-4. Heliport Markings . 72Figure 7-5. Helipad Markings . 74Figure 7-6. Hospital Helipad Markings . 75Figure 7-7. Landing Lane Layout . 76Figure 7-8. Landing Lane Helipad and 1/3rd Length Marker Panels . 77Figure 7-9. Elevated Helipad Example . 77Figure 7-10. Dimensions for Supplemental Elevated Helipad Markings . 78Figure 7-11. Rotary Wing Overruns and Shoulder Markings . 81Figure 7-12. Type 1 Parking for CH-47 . 82Figure 7-13. Type 1 Parking for all Rotary Wing Aircraft Except CH-47 . 83Figure 7-14. Type 2 Parking for Wheeled Rotary Wing Aircraft . 84Figure 7-15. Type 2 Parking for Skid Rotary Wing Aircraft . 85Figure 8-1. Runway, Taxiway, and Apron Area Closure Markings . 89Figure 8-2. Closed Runway, Taxiway, and Taxilane Pavement Markings . 90Figure 8-3. Placement of Permanently Closed Apron Pavement Markings . 91Figure 8-4. Low Profile Barricades . 92Figure 8-6. Runway Shoulder Markings (Deceptive Surfaces) . 97Figure 8-7. Taxiway and Apron Shoulder Markings (Deceptive Surfaces) . 98Figure 8-8. Typical Inertial Navigation System Marking . 99vi

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018Figure 8-9. Ground Receiver Checkpoint (Directional) . 100Figure 8-10. Compass Calibration Pad Markings . 102Figure 8-11. Compass Calibration Pad Numerals . 103Figure 8-12. T-6 Propeller Hazard Area Pavement Markings . 105Figure 8-13. F-16 Engine Inlet Danger Area Pavement Markings for Idle Thrust 106Figure 8-14. Hydrant Fuel Pit Markings . 107Figure 8-15. C-12 Propeller and Exhaust Hazard Area Pavement Markings . 108TABLESTable 6-1. Cargo Aircraft Apron Layout Dimensions . 41Table B-1 Inches to Millimeters . 116Table B-2 Feet to Meters . 117vii

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018This Page Intentionally Left Blankviii

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND AND GENERAL INFORMATION1-1BACKGROUND.These criteria are a compilation of U.S. and international standards, adopted from theInternational Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards, North Atlantic TreatyOrganization (NATO) agreements, and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)standards, as well as individual Service- or aircraft-specific technical orders. Prior topublication of this UFC, each Service component promulgated independent airfieldmarking standards based upon mission needs and operational doctrine, none of whichfully complied with NATO, ICAO, or FAA criteria. Because DoD Service componentsoperate worldwide, it is desirable and necessary that visual aids be commonlyrecognized and universally accepted by all DoD personnel and our allies.1-2GENERAL INFORMATION.Pavement markings are provided to enable and enhance safe and informed aircraft andvehicle operation on the airfield and roadways. They are required to be prominent andof uniform configuration so they are clearly understood. Do not place locally devisednon-standard markings without authorization from the appropriate authority. Suchmarkings confuse aviators and ground personnel and cause runway incursions andaccidents.1-3PURPOSE AND SCOPE.This UFC provides standards for marking DoD airfields and heliports. This UFC alsorequires use of the Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Manual of Uniform TrafficControl Devices (MUTCD) for marking roadways, vehicular traffic routes on airfields,and airfield service roads maintained and operated by the designated authority. It givesthe minimum level of markings necessary for paved surfaces of fixed and rotary wingrunways, taxiways, helipads, and landing lanes as well as unique apron or hard standmarkings necessary for maintenance or calibration of aircraft. It refers to FAA or ICAOstandards for marking the surfaces of obstructions when deemed necessary by thedesignated authority. For additional airfield facility types, such as the F-35 verticallanding (VL) pad, landing helicopter deck (LHD) simulated deck facilities, and otherfixed-wing short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL) facilities, see UFC 3-260-01.1-4APPLICABILITY.These criteria apply to all DoD activities except those operating at airports owned andcontrolled by an authority other than DoD. U.S. Navy and Marine Corps pavementmarking details for shore-based installations are provided in NAVAIR 51-50AAA-2,General Requirements for Shore Based Airfield Marking and Lighting. Download a copyat -criteria (designated TSEWGNAVAIR 51-50111-2, General Requirements for Shorebased Airfield Marking andLighting) or contact the management authority for NAVAIR 51-50-AAA-2 at:Commanding Officer Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Lakehurst Logistics,Code 6.8.5.1, Lakehurst, NJ, 08733, phone (732) 323-5073.1

UFC 3-260-0416 May 2018Base the marking criteria used upon ownership of the facility or officialagreements with the host nation or host aviation authority. For example, DoD-ownedand -controlled facilities are marked in accordance with DoD criteria and municipallyowned airfields and airports are marked in accordance with FAA or ICAO criteria, asapplicable.It is recommended that noncompliant markings be updated to comply with thisUFC at the next painting cycle. However, existing markings are not required to bechanged t

UFC 3-260-04 16 May 2018 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEET . Document: UFC 3-260-04, Airfield and Heliport Marking Superseding: Air Force Engineering Technical Letter (ETL) 04-2, Standard Airfield Pavement Marking Schemes, 19 July 2004; Army TM 5-823-4 C1, Marking of Army Airfield-Heliport Operational and Maintenance Facilities, July 1987; UFC 3

Related Documents:

(UFC) requirements. ' The Proposed Action is needed to bring Runway 05/23 into compliance with UFC 3-260-01, Airfield Planning and Design Criteria and UFC 3-260-02, Pavement Design for Airfields. In addition, the Proposed Action is needed to bring airfield lighting systems i

UFC 3-301-02 3 March 2020 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) REVISION SUMMARY SHEET Subject: UFC 3-301-02, Design of Risk Category V Structures, National Strategic Military Assets Cancels: UFC 3-310-04, Seismic Design, Change 1, 20 June 2016 Description of Changes: This new UFC contains the seismic design provisions for DoD Risk Category V

UFC 1-200-01 8 October 2019 Change 1, 1 Oct 2020 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) REVISION SUMMARY SHEET Document: UFC 1-200-01, DoD BUILDING CODE Superseding: UFC 1-200-01, DoD BUILDING CODE (GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENTS), dated 20 June 2016, with Change 2, dated 01 Nov 2018 Description: This update to UFC 1-200-01 represents the Tri-Services effort to bring

UFC 3-501-01 October 6, 2015 Change 1, 01 November 2019 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEET Document: UFC 3-501-01, Electrical Engineering Superseding: UFC 3-501-01, Electrical Engineering, with Change 3, 1 July 2012. Description: This UFC 3-501-01 provides electrical engineering design and analysis criteria for design-build and design-bid-build projects.

NAVAL AIR STATION KEY WEST (NASKW) ITB 17-007 Project OM19001601 PART 5 - CHAPTER 2 - Page 2 2.4 Appropriate Design UFC 1-300-09N Design Procedures UFC 3-301-01 Structural Engineering UFC 3-400 Mechanical Engni eerni g UFC 3-420-01 Plumbing Systems UFC 3-501-01 Electrical Engineering UFC

UFC 4-730-10 8 May 2019 Change 1, 11 June 2021 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) NEW DOCUMENT SUMMARY SHEET Document: UFC 4-730-10, Fire Stations Superseding: UFC 4-730-10, Fire Stations, dated 15 June 2006, and FC 4- 730-10N, Navy and Marine Corps Fire Stations, dated 1 December 2013. Description: This UFC provides criteria for planning and design of fire stations.

UFC 3-601-02 7 October 2021 UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC) REVISION SUMMARY SHEET Document: UFC 3-601-02, Fire Protection Systems Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance Superseding: UFC 3-601-02, dated 8 September 2010, and all subsequent changes. Description of Changes: This Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) provides best practice maintenance methods from the DoD, other government agencies .

The level of management responsible for developing strategic goals is: A. line B. supervisor C. functional D. senior . D. other organisations that do business with the 14 Where a stakeholder is identified as having high interest and low power, an organisation should: keep them satisfied monitor their interests and power C. manage them closely keep them informed 15. Highfield Aeet 12 .