Predicting The Characteristics And Results Of The .

2y ago
14 Views
3 Downloads
403.24 KB
28 Pages
Last View : 4d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Rafael Ruffin
Transcription

Predicting the characteristics and results of the PRONOUNCE trial: study protocolJoshua D. Wallach, MS, PhD; Yihong Deng, PhD; Rozalina McCoy, MD, MS; Jeph Herrin, PhD;Eric C. Polley, PhD; Alyssa Berkowitz, MPH, Bill Crown, PhD; Sanket S. Dhruva, MD, MHS;Lindsey R. Sangaralingham, MPH; Xiaoxi Yao, PhD, MPH; Peter A. Noseworthy, MD; NilayShah, PhD; Joseph S. Ross, MD, MHS; Timothy D. Lyon, MDProtocol draft: August 2020Yale University-May Clinical Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (CERSI)project area: Understanding the use of existing real-world data for medical product evaluation1

PROTOCOLThe purpose of this analysis plan is to provide a detailed description of our methods anddecisions, in order to guide our analyst(s). To facilitate replications of our methodology, theinformation in this document will also be shared in the supplementary materials of the finalmanuscript.Protocol changes made after accessing the data are in bold.1. bA1cHRMACENAPCIPDCPSARCTRWDSBPSSAAndrogen deprivation therapyAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseCoronary artery bypass graftingConfidence intervalComputed tomographyDiastolic blood pressureElectronic health recordEvaluation & ManagementEstimated Glomerular Filtration RateFood and Drug AdministrationGonadotropin-releasing hormoneHemoglobin A1cHazard ratioMajor Adverse Cardiovascular EventsNot applicablePercutaneous coronary interventionProportion of days coveredProstate-specific antigenRandomized controlled trialsReal world dataSystolic blood pressureSocial Security Administration2

2. KEY DEFINITIONSItemIndex DateVariable nameindex dateDescriptionThe date patients received degarelix (Firmagon) orleuprolide (Lupron depot)Index Medicationindex medBaseline PeriodbaselinePatient’s first prescription of degarelix (Firmagon)or leuprolide (Lupron depot)Any time before and including the index date usedto establish a patient’s medical history12/24/2008 (degarelix (Firmagon) FDA approvaldate) – 6/30/2019OptumLabs Data WarehouseStudy PeriodData Source3. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVESRigorous double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the goldstandard for generating evidence for the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of any clinicalintervention. Although RCTs are used to inform the decisions made by the Food and DrugAdministration (FDA), health insurance payers, professional societies, patients, and clinicians,1these studies often have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, small sample sizes, and shortfollow-up durations.2 These limitations can undermine the generalizability of RCTs to real-worldclinical practice, and have stimulated interested in research focused on generating evidence onmedical products using observational research methods applied to real-world data sources.Advances in the quantity, quality, and granularity of real-world data, and improvementsin statistical methods used to account for unmeasured confounding, have provided opportunitiesto use real-world data to inform our understanding of drug safety and efficacy. While manystudies have estimated the results of completed RCTs using real-world data and observationalmethods,3-9 the majority have focused on comparisons with large prospective cohort studies, asopposed to retrospective analysis of routinely-collected electronic health record (EHR) or3

administrative claims data. Furthermore, less is known about the ability to simulate RCTeligibility criteria for ongoing trials to predict the characteristics of real-world populations anddetermine whether the characteristics of the RCT population and the real-world populations aresimilar. Moreover, it would be valuable to predict the results of ongoing trials, thereby avoidingthe potential biases that could be introduced by trying to replicate the results of RCTs that havealready been completed and disseminated among the scientific community.Using ClinicalTrials.gov, we have identified an illustrative test case to assess thepotential opportunities, advantages, and limitations of using retrospective research methods topursue evaluations of drug safety using real-world data, including as an alternative to RCTs. ThePRONOUNCE trial is an ongoing Phase IIIb comparative safety trial focused on comparing thecardiovascular safety of degarelix (Firmagon), a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)antagonist, and leuprolide (Lupron Depot), a GnRH agonist, among patients with prostate cancerand cardiovascular disease. Prostate cancer is the second most commonly occurring cancer inmen, and among patients with advanced prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) isa preferred treatment option.10 However, studies have suggested that ADT in the form of GnRHagonists, such as leuprolide, increase the risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality,especially among prostate cancer patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.11 AlthoughGnRH antagonists are believed to be associated with improved cardiovascular safety comparedto GnRH agonists,12 the PRONOUNCE trial was designed to clarify uncertainties and comparethe cardiovascular safety profile of the GnRH antagonist degarelix and the GnRH agonistleuprolide.4

Using real-world data from OptumLabs, a large database of insurance claims linked withEHR data, we sought to predict the results of the PRONOUNCE trial by applying observationalresearch methods to the real-world patients.4. METHODS4.1 Study designThis study will be a retrospective cohort analysis using OptumLabs Data Warehouse.4.2 Data sourcesOptumLabs Data WarehouseOptumLabs Data Warehouse contains longitudinal health information on over 160 millionpredominantly privately insured individuals, and includes a large number of Medicare Part D andMedicare Advanced beneficiaries.13 Patient-level information includes socio-demographiccharacteristics (i.e., age, sex, and race) and geographic region. Data also include health insurancecoverage (dates of enrollment, primary/secondary coverage, Medicaid/Medicare status),administrative claims (diagnosis and procedure codes), and pharmacy claims (prescribingphysician, pharmacy, days of supply, drug/quality/strength/data dispensed). These data alsoinclude physician & facility claims (physician type and specialty). For roughly 50 millionindividuals, additional information is available from electronic medical record encounters,including vital signs and laboratory measurements.ClinicalTrials.gov and the PRONOUNCE trial Protocol5

The PRONOUNCE trial was identified using ClinicalTrials.gov (Box 1). The trialinclusion and exclusion criterial were established using ClinicalTrials.gov and the descriptionsoutlined in the PRONOUNCE trial protocol (Table 1).14Box 1. PRONOUNCE trial CharacteristicsTitle: A Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients WithAdvanced Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease (PRONOUNCE)Aim(s): To test whether degarelix (Firmagon), a marketed drug for advanced prostate cancer, can reducethe risk of cardiovascular complications compared to leuprolide (Lupron Depot), another drug foradvanced prostate cancer, among patients with prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease.Primary endpoint: Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), including death due to any cause,non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.Secondary endpoints: Time from randomization to occurrence of:1. myocardial infarction (fatal, non-fatal)2. stroke (fatal, non-fatal)3. unstable angina requiring hospitalization (fatal, non-fatal)4. cardiovascular-related deathSource: rm PRONOUNCE&draw 2&rank 1Table 1. The PROUNCE Trial Eligibility CriteriaPRONOUNCE Eligibility CriteriaOperational Definition in OLDWInclusion CriteriaHistologically confirmedadenocarcinoma of the prostateTumor, node, metastasis stagingavailable prior to treatment start(bone scan and/or CT scan and/orMRI) 12 weeks prior to study start.If no radiographic image is availableat the time of screening, a bone scanshould be performedIndication to initiate androgendeprivation therapy (ADT)Predefined cardiovascular diseaseinclusion criteriaNA: Already defined in the initial cohort as:Patients must have at least one “Evaluation and Management”visit with a diagnosis of prostate cancer within 6 monthsbefore index data, at least one “Evaluation and Management”visit with a diagnosis of prostate cancer at any time after theindex dateSensitivity analysis: prostate biopsy requiredNA: ‘Index date’ is the first fill of degarelix or leuprolide**For the leuprolide cohort, we will allow up to one month ofbicalutamide prior to leuprolide initiation6

Pre-existing ASCVD (confirmeddiagnosis, documented) according toat least one of the following criteria:Prior myocardial infarction 30days before randomization; priorrevascularization procedure 30days before randomization);Coronary artery: stentplacement/balloon angioplasty orcoronary artery bypass graft surgery;Coronary artery: stentplacement/balloon angioplasty orendarterectomy surgery;Iliac, femoral, popliteal arteries: stentplacement/balloon angioplasty orvascular bypass surgeryTo establish history of cardiovascular disease using claimsdata, it is common to use both primary and secondarydischarge diagnosis and procedure codes. In particular, we willidentify the following using discharge diagnosis and procedurecodes as indicators of a history of cardiovascular disease, 30 days before the index date: Myocardial infarction,percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary arterybypass grafting (CABG), peripheral artery revascularization,carotid revascularization any positionWe do not have angiogram, CT angiogram, or ankle-brachialpressure data.At least one vascular stenosis 50%at any time point beforerandomization by angiogram or CTangiogramCoronary arteryCarotid arteryIliac femoral, or popliteal arteriesCarotid ultrasound results thatdocumented a vascular stenosis 50% at any time point beforerandomizationAnkle-brachial pressure index 0.9 atany time point before randomization.Exclusion CriteriaPrevious or current hormonalmanagement of prostate cancer-- Surgical castrationAny hormonal manipulationNA: ‘Index date’ is the first fill of degarelix or leuprolide*For the leuprolide cohort, we will allow up to one month ofbicalutamide prior to leuprolide initiationExcept prior neoadjuvant/adjuvanthormonal therapy, in this casetreatment must be terminated 12months prior to study start.Main cardiovascular exclusioncriteria7

Uncontrolled type 1 or type 2diabetes mellitus (defined as HbA1c 10%) at time of randomizationUncontrolled hypertension (SBP 180 mmHg or DBP 110 mmHg) attime of randomizationA history of congenital long QTsyndrome or risk factors for torsadede pointes ventricular arrhythmias(e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia,concomitant medication known tocause QT prolongation)Within 30 days prior torandomization- Myocardial infarction- Stroke(hemorrhagic/ischemic)- Coronary, carotid, orperipheral arteryrevascularizationNA: Restricting patients with laboratory data would limit thesampleNA: Restricting patients with laboratory data would limit thesampleNA: This exclusion criteria only applies to patients at risk forventricular arrhythmiasTo identify recent/active cardiovascular events, we will useprimary diagnosis of myocardial infarction and stroke(emergency department or inpatient visits) within 30 daysbefore index date, as patients hospitalized for an acutecardiovascular event would be expected to have thesediagnoses listed as the primary discharge diagnosis, whilepatients with a history of cardiovascular disease would beexpected to have these diagnoses listed as secondary dischargediagnoses.Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary arterybypass grafting (CABG), peripheral artery revascularization(limb events), carotid revascularization within 30 days beforeindex dateNA: We cannot determine planned or scheduled PCIprocedures.Planned or scheduled cardiac surgeryor PCI procedure that is known at thetime of randomizationAnkle-brachial pressure index 0.9 at NA: Restricting patients with laboratory data would limit theany point before randomizationsample.ASCVD atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CT computed tomography; DBP diastolic bloodpressure; HbA1c hemoglobin A1c; NA not applicable; SBP systolic blood pressure;4.3 Study inclusion and exclusion criteriaWe will apply the PRONOUNCE trial inclusion and exclusion criteria listed onClinicalTrials.gov, which we will update with information made available by the PRONOUNCEtrial authors,14 to patients represented in OptumLabs data (Table 1). We will not restrict the realworld sample to the planned sample size for the trial, but rather include all patients who8

otherwise meet the eligibility criteria. However, we will apply successive inclusion, and thenexclusion criteria, determining which criteria have the biggest impact on the size of thepopulation of patients observed in real-world data (Table 2).The PRONOUNCE trial includes male patients, without any age restrictions, withadvanced prostate cancer and cardiovascular disease, who were treated with degarelix(Firmagon) or leuprolide (Lupron depot) (Table 3). We will first identify all patients whoinitiated degarelix and leuprolide between 12/24/2008 and 6/30/2019. The start date was selectedbecause degarelix received FDA approval on 12/24/2008. The date of an individual’s firsttreatment (first fill date) with degarelix or leuprolide will be defined as the index date.Table 2. Impact of inclusion/exclusion criteriaPRONOUNCEOperational Definition inEligibility Criteria OLDWOverallCohort(N )Total % of patientseligible forPRONOUNCEDegarelix(Firmagon)(N )Leuprolide(LupronDepot)(N )Total % of patientsineligible forPRONOUNCEPatients who met one of the following exclusion criteria (%)Previous or currentA prescription fill of ADThormonalmedications within 6 monthsmanagement ofbefore the index date ORprostate cancerProcedure codes for bilateralorchiectomy within 6 monthsbefore the index dateWithin 30 days prior Primary diagnosis of myocardialto randomization:infarction and stroke (emergency-Myocardialdepartment or inpatient visits)infarctionwithin 30 days before index-Strokedate;(hemorrhagic)percutaneous coronaryintervention, coronary artery9

-Coronary, carotid,or peripheral arteryrevascularizationbypass grafting, peripheral arteryrevascularization (limb events),carotid revascularization within30 days before index dateTable 3. Generic Names of Medical TherapyBrand nameDrug classFirmagonGonadotropin-releasing hormonereceptor antagonistsLupron DepotGonadotropin-releasing hormonereceptor agonistGeneric NamesDegarelixLeuprolide, leuprolideacetateWe will then identify all male enrollees, without any age restrictions, with validdemographic (age and race/ethnicity) and residence data. All enrollees will be required to have atleast 6 months of continuous enrollment with medical and pharmacy coverage (i.e. no more than45 days gap in coverage) before the index date, in order to capture an adequate prior medicalhistory.We developed an algorithm to identify enrollees with prostate cancer based on clinicalexpertise and similar methodology outlined in previous studies, which reported positivepredictive values between 70% and 82%.15-18 Specifically, we will require patients to have atleast one Evaluation and Management (E&M) visit with a diagnosis of prostate cancer within 6months before the index date and at least one E&M visit with a diagnosis of prostate cancer anytime after the index date. We are not able to ascertain prostate cancer severity, so nocategorization by prostate cancer grade will be possible. For our primary analysis, a prostatebiopsy will not be required, since patients may receive a diagnosis from a biopsy of metastaticsite (e.g. bone or lymph node). As a secondary analysis, we will restrict to a subcohort of patientswith at least one prostate biopsy.10

To identify patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, it common to use bothprimary and secondary discharge diagnosis and procedure codes. This is an established methodfor administrative claims data research and used extensively for cohort creation and qualitymeasurement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).19 In particular, we willidentify the following using discharge diagnosis and procedure codes as indicators of a history ofcardiovascular disease, at least 30 days before the index date: myocardial infarction,percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), peripheralartery revascularization, carotid revascularization any position.Among patients with prostate cancer and pre-defined cardiovascular disease, we will usepharmacy claims data to exclude patients with a prescription fill of ADT medications within 6months before the index date. However, for the leuprolide cohort, we will allow patient to remaineligible for inclusion even if they received bicalutamide within one month prior to leuprolideinitiation. Leuprolide, a GnRH agonist, can paradoxically lead to a transient increase intestosterone during the first 1 to 3 weeks of treatment. Therefore, bicalutamide is often given fora few weeks before the initial leuprolide injection in order to block any potential adverse effectsfrom the testosterone flare. Degarelix, a GnRH antagonist, does not produce a testosterone flare.Lastly, we will exclude patients with recent/active cardiovascular events. We will useprimary diagnosis of myocardial infarction and stroke (emergency department or inpatient visits)within 30 days before index date, as patients hospitalized for an acute cardiovascular eventwould be expected to have these diagnoses listed as the primary discharge diagnosis, whilepatients with a history of cardiovascular disease would be expected to have these diagnoses listedas secondary discharge diagnoses.11

5. Measurements5.1 Baseline characteristicsWe will record and summarize key baseline characteristics, including socio-demographiccharacteristics, comorbidities, and prior and concurrent medication use (Table 4). Sociodemographic characteristics include age (mean, median, categories ( 54, 55-64, 65-74, 75 ),and race/ethnicity (Asian, Black, Hispanic, White, Unknown). The race/ethnicity data providedby OptumLabs is primarily self-reported, with imputation by the data provider based on otheravailable administrative data when it is missing.20Update August 2020: After accessing the data and running preliminary analyses, weupdated our protocol to account for additional baseline comorbidities (italicized andunderlined in Table 4). These comorbidities were selected to account for residualconfounding by severity of disease. In particular, we observed that degarelix wasparadoxically associated with increased mortality. To further account for observedimbalances between the degarelix and leuprolide patients, we also matched on state.Medical history will be determined using patients’ physician, facility, and pharmacyclaims before or on the index date. We will use all data available to us to establish patients’medical history (Table 4). Data from the baseline 6-months period will be used for allcovariates, unless otherwise specified. In OptumLabs, approximately one third of patients withinsurance claims data have linked laboratory results, and the availability depends on the contractsbetween labs testing facilities and the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. For the patients withlaboratory data, we will determine serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and estimatedGlomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). We will also determine whether patients had a prostate12

biopsy or received radiotherapy within 6 months before the index date. Previous treatment withbicalutamide and other baseline medications will be determined 6 months prior to index date.Table 4. Baseline characteristics before and after propensity score matchingaBefore PS MatchingDegarelixLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )(N )SMDAgeMean (SD)Median (IQR)Age group 5455-6465-7475 phic RegionMidwestNortheastSouthWestUnknownSerum PSA levelNMean (SD)Median (IQR)Estimated GlomerularFiltration Rate (eFGR)NumberMean (SD)Median (IQR)Degarelix(N )After PS MatchingLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )SMDPrior prostate biopsy(within 6 months ofindex date)Baseline comorbiditiesCoronary artery diseaseChronic kidney diseaseCongestive heart failureCerebrovascular diseasePeripheral vasculardiseaseObesityAtrial FibrillationSleep apnea13

Table 4. Baseline characteristics before and after propensity score matchingaBefore PS MatchingDegarelixLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )(N ic ulcer diseaseMild liver diseaseDiabetes withoutchronic complicationDiabetes with chroniccomplicationMetastatic solid tumorRheumatic diseaseCharlson comorbidityscoreMean (SD)Median (IQR)Prior radiotherapy(within 6 months beforeindex date)Prior use ofbicalutamide (within 6months before indexdate)Other baselinemedications (within 6months before indexdate)StatinNon-statin lipid lowermedicationsACEiARBACEi/ARBSacubitril / ValsartanWarfarinDOACBeta-blockersLoop diureticsAldosterone antagonistDigoxinCalcium channelblockerAntiplateletNumber ofhospitalizations0Degarelix(N )After PS MatchingLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )SMD14

Table 4. Baseline characteristics before and after propensity score matchingaBefore PS MatchingDegarelixLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )(N )SMD12 Number of ER visits01Degarelix(N )After PS MatchingLeuprolideTotal(N )(N )SMD2 Year of Cohort WIOTHERACEi, angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors; ARB, angiotensin II receptor blocker; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; COPD,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DOAC, direct-acting oral anticoagulants; IQR, interquartile range; MI myocardial infarction;PAD, peripheral artery disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary interventionaUnderlined values were added after data were accessed15

5.2 Follow-up and outcome ascertainmentOptumLabs Data Warehouse is continuously updated on a monthly basis and the data arecomplete within 6 months of the service being provided. The analyses of this study will beperformed from May to September 2020, implying that the most recent data available to us willbe up to October, 2019. Therefore, patients will be followed until the end of the study period(07/31/2019), the end of enrollment in health insurance plans, or death, whichever is first.5.3 Study outcomesWe will use similar primary and secondary endpoints as the PRONOUNCE trial (Box 1).The primary endpoint in the PRONOUNCE trial is the time to first occurrence of the compositeMajor Adverse Cardiovascular Event (MACE) endpoint, defined as death due to any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. The secondary endpoints in the PRONOUNCEtrial include: time from randomization to occurrence of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction,fatal and non-fatal stroke, fatal and non-fatal unstable angina requiring hospitalization, andcardiovascular-related death as separate outcomes. Using OptumLabs data, we are able todetermine stroke, myocardial infarction, and angina, but are unable to distinguish between fataland non-fatal events (Table 5). However, we will use commonly used, published, and previouslyvalidated diagnosis and procedure codes for MACE. For instance, previous evaluations suggestthat the performance of similar MACE outcome codes are relatively good, with positivepredictive values between 88.4% and 94% for myocardial infarction, 85% for ischemic stroke,and 80%-98% for hemorrhagic stroke.21-2516

Table 5. PRONOUNCE trial Endpoint DefinitionPRONOUNCE trial OperationalDefinitionDefinition in OLDWPrimary endpointTime fromrandomization to thefirst confirmed(adjudicated)occurrence of thecomposite MajorAdverseCardiovascular Event(MACE) endpoint,defined as death dueto any cause, nonfatal myocardialinfarction or nonfatal stroke [up to336 days]SecondaryTime fromendpointsrandomization tooccurrence ofmyocardialinfarction (fatal,non-fatal) [up to 336days]Time fromrandomization tooccurrence of stroke(fatal, non-fatal) [upto 336 days]Time fromrandomization tooccurrence ofunstable anginarequiringhospitalization(fatal, non-fatal) [upto 336 days]Time fromrandomization tooccurrence ofcardiovascularrelated death [up to336 days]ICD International Classification of DiseasesICD codesTime fromrandomization to thefirst confirmed(adjudicated)occurrence of thecomposite MajorAdverseCardiovascular Event(MACE) endpoint,defined as death dueto any cause,myocardialinfarction or stroke[up to 336 days]Myocardialinfarction:Time fromrandomization tooccurrence ofmyocardialinfarction [up to 336days]Stroke:Time fromrandomization tooccurrence of stroke[up to 336 days]ICD-9: 41001,41011, 41021, 41031,41041, 41051, 41061,41071, 41081, 41091ICD-10: I2101,I2102, I2109, I2111,I2119, I2121, I2129,I213, I214, I220,I221, I222, I228,I229ICD-9: 43301,43311, 43321, 43331,43381, 43391, 43401,43411, 43491, 436,430, 431, 444X,435XICD-10: I693, I63XTime fromrandomization tooccurrence of angina[up to 336 days]Angina:ICD-9: 413XICD-10: I20XTime fromrandomization tooccurrence of allcause mortality [upto 336 days]We cannot determinecardiovascularrelated death17

Mortality will be identified based on the Social Security Death Master File and dischargestatus. Before November 2011, the Social Security Death Master File has complete mortalitydata. However, effective on November 1st, 2011, Section 205(r) of the Social Security Actprohibits the Social Security Administration (SSA) from disclosing state death records that SSAreceives through its contracts with the states, except in limited circumstances. Thus, if the SSAknows of a death only from the states and not from any of its other sources of death information,which happens roughly one-third of the time, those death data will not appear on the DeathMaster File.26 Using discharge status (i.e. in-hospital death), we typically capture an additional30% of deaths beyond what has been captured by Death Master File; we anticipate therefore thatmost of the deaths missing from Death Master File should be captured by discharge status,particularly since most deaths occur in an institutional setting. We acknowledge that a smallproportion of patients who died out of hospital and were not captured by Death Master File couldbe missing, however, this should be non-differential between treatment groups and should notinfluence our comparison.5.4 Study follow-upFor each patient, we will also determine the follow-up time, which will start the day afterinitiation of degarelix or leuprolide. Follow-up will continue until the date when the patientexperiences any of the following events:(a) An outcome of interest(b) End of insurance coverage (end of patient enrollment)(c) Death(d) Reaches the maximum anticipated follow-up of the trial (336 days)18

5.5 Missing dataPatients will be considered to have a condition, comorbidity, outcome, or drug exposureif they have a corresponding claim, and will be considered not having a comorbidity, outcome ordrug exposure if they do not have a corresponding claim. Although we will therefore not havemissing comorbidities, drug use, or outcomes data, misclassification may exist. While this is alimitation of using claims data, the algorithms used to define our inclusion/exclusion criteria,outcomes of interest, and important covariates are commonly used and have demonstrated goodperformance in previous studies. We suspect that any existing misclassification will be unrelatedto treatment group and should not meaningfully impact our findings.We will exclude patients with invalid demographic data during the cohort creationprocess (e.g., missing residence region or inconsistent birth year). However, we anticipate fewerthan 1% of patients being excluded during the cohort creation. For race/ethnicity, the categoriesin the database are non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, Asian, other andunknown. The other and unknown will be used as a separate category in the propensity scoremodel.6. STATISTICAL METHODS6.1 Main analysis using OptumLabs cohortFor our primary analyses, we will focus on OptumLabs patients who would be eligiblefor PRONOUNCE based on the operational definitions of the inclusion and exclusion criteria inTable 1 (base population).Propensity score matching will be used to balance the difference in baselinecharacteristics between patients who received degarelix versus those who received leuprolide. A19

propensity score, the probability of receiving degarelix, will be estimated using a logisticregression model which includes patient characteristics presented in Table 4. No interactionterms will be used. One-to-one nearest neighborhood caliper matching will be used to matchpatients based on the logit of the propensity score using a caliper equal to 0.2 of the standarddeviation of the logit of the propensity score.27 Standardized differences will be used to assessthe balance of covariates after matching and a standardized difference within 0.1 will beconsidered acceptable.28 Covariates with standardized differences above 0.1 will be adjusted forin the regression models.Cox proportional hazards regression will be used to compare patients receiving degarelixversus those who received leuprolide for the primary and secondary outcomes in the propensitymatched cohort, with robust sandwich estimates to account for the clustering within matchedsets.29 The proportional hazard assumption will be tested on the basis of Schoenfeld residuals.30If the proportional hazard assumption is not met, we will assess alternative time to event models,including parametric models, using Akaike information criterion and Bayesian informationcriterion t

Item Variable name Description Index Date index_date The date patients received degarelix (Firmagon) or leuprolide (Lupron depot) Index Medication index_med Patient’s first prescription of degarelix (Firmagon) or leuprolide (Lupron depot) Baseline Period baseline Any time before and including the index date used to establish a patient’s medical history

Related Documents:

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Food outlets which focused on food quality, Service quality, environment and price factors, are thè valuable factors for food outlets to increase thè satisfaction level of customers and it will create a positive impact through word ofmouth. Keyword : Customer satisfaction, food quality, Service quality, physical environment off ood outlets .

More than words-extreme You send me flying -amy winehouse Weather with you -crowded house Moving on and getting over- john mayer Something got me started . Uptown funk-bruno mars Here comes thé sun-the beatles The long And winding road .