1 MI Syria / Turkey Evaluation Report Health Care And .
1MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation ReportHealth care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)Recommended Template for Evaluation ReportThe evaluation team uses this template to guide their evaluation report. Theyshould consider all sections of the template. However, some sections or headings may not be relevant for the report being written and others may need tobe added.Please ensure that the report is written in the Font “Verdana 11” and withoutItalics and that graphs, tables, maps etc. contain alternative text in order tomake the report accessible.The report shall be written clearly and understandable to the audience. Thereport should be translated into the local language whenever possible and according to the needs of the intended audience.Each report needs to include the Malteser International logo as in this template.The name of the consultant company or the evaluators can be included separately; the logo of the company shall not appear prominently, but rather in thefooter.Authors of report:Published date:Please include the following Disclaimer:This publication was produced at the request of Malteser International. It was prepared independently by [list authors and/or organizations involved in the preparation of the report]. The views expressed in this report are those of the author(s) anddo not necessarily reflect the position of Malteser International, [list of the organisation/partner/project that have been evaluated] or any other party. Nor do these entities accept any liability for claims arising from the report’s content or reliance onit.1
2MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation ReportHealth care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)TITLE PAGEProgram/Project Name,Project NumberProject Location, CountryPartner OrganisationProject start & end dates,Phase of projectTotal cost of projectEvaluation PurposeEvaluation Type(mid-term, end of phase)Commissioning organisation/contact personNames and organisationsof the Evaluation TeammembersPrimary MethodologyEvaluation Start and EndDatesRecipient of Final Evaluation ReportDate of report submission2
3MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation ReportHealth care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)ContentsTitle Page . 2List of Abbreviations and Acronyms . 4List of Figures and Tables . 4Map of Program / Project Area . 41.Executive Summary . 52.Introduction . 53.Background . 54.Evaluation Methods and Limitations . 65.Analysis, Findings and Conclusions . 66.Recommendations . 87.Lessons Learnt . 88.Annexes . 83
4MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation ReportHealth care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSMIMalteser InternationalMEALMonitoring, Evaluation, Accountability and LearningLIST OF FIGURES AND TABLESMAP OF PROGRAM / PROJECT AREA4
MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation Report5Health care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BackgroundMain findings and conclusions(Key) recommendations and, where appropriate, overarching conclusions/.Lessons LearnedThe summary shall be drafted in such a way that it can presented to a variety of audiences keeping in mind that it might be the only part of the report that some people will have the time to read. The summary will be used for a synthesis of the annual evaluation work by the MEAL team and for sharing with other Malteser International staff.2. INTRODUCTIONIncludes a brief description of the purpose, objectives and scope of the evaluationand explanation whether there have been any restrictions during the evaluation. Italso outlines why the evaluation has been conducted at this point in time and bywhom the findings will be used.2.1. Brief description of the development measure2.2. Subject of the evaluationCause and aim of the evaluationJustification context of the evaluationAim of the evaluationCentral evaluation questions2.3. Evaluation Mission Period and procedure of the evaluation Composition and independence of the evaluation team Participation of partners and target groups in the evaluation External factors influencing the implementation of the evaluation and theirconsequences3. BACKGROUNDContains fundamental information on the project/programme being evaluated:1. Context (national, political, economic, social, cultural background);5
MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation Report6Health care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)2. Project objectives, expected results and intended changes for target group(outcome);3. Any relevant changes in the project design;4. Activities implemented and outputs achieved so far;5. Details on the target groups (incl. disaggregated data as applicable);6. Reference to past reviews and evaluations.7. Development of the performance of the project executing agency and its partners4. EVALUATION METHODS AND LIMITATIONSExplains the evaluation methods applied incl. the rationale for the selection of themethods in relation to answering the evaluation questions. Include a discussion of:1.2.3.4.5.6.Data and information sources;Sampling strategies and rationale (if applicable);Data collection procedures and instruments;Selection of site and interview partners;Stakeholder engagement and level of involvement;Any limitations in data collection and analysis, data quality or access to datasources.7. Measures to ensure the protection of stakeholdersThe full description of the methodology can also be provided as an annex.5. ANALYSIS, FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSMain body of the report, including how the data received has been analysed andfindings that result out of this analysis. This chapter should give answers to the essential evaluation criteria.5.1 RELEVANCE is the intervention doing the right things?Conformity of the objective with the needs of the target groups and with theobjectives of the donor, grantee/project executing agency, implementing partners and, if applicable, the country.Appropriateness of the basic developmental orientation and conception5.2COHERENCE how well does the intervention fit?5.3EFFECTIVENESS is the intervention achieving its objectives? Quality of the planning of the development measure6
MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation Report7Health care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585) 5.4 5.5 Quality of the target system and indicatorsQuality of the implementation of the development measureMotivation, ownership and legitimacy of the project executing agencyQuality of the control of the development measureTarget achievementOther (possibly also negative) effects at the level of outputs and direct impactsEFFICIENCY how well are resources being used?Ratio of costs and benefits (minimum: detailed presentation of costs).IMPACT what difference does the intervention make?Achievement of the overarching development policy goalsModel character, structure formation and broad impactOther (possibly also negative) effects at the level of higher-level impacts5.6SUSTAINABILITY will the benefits last? Permanence of the positive effects (after the end of the support), also in view ofthe development of the environment Risks and potentials for sustainable effectiveness at the organizational and target group level5.7 Cross-Cutting issuesCross-cutting development issues such as Gender, Vulnerable Groups, Environment a.o.Contribution to organizational goals of the grantee, if applicable.Data should be presented in easy to read charts, tables, graphs and maps.Findings are facts based on data collected and do not represent an opinion. Theyshould be structured according to the objectives and evaluation questions as listedin the Terms of Reference. Findings should include a discussion of planned and actually achieved results of the project and explain the factors affecting the achievementof results. Assumptions and risks as identified in the design should be discussed.Conclusions synthesize and interpret findings and make judgments supported byone or more specific findings. They should highlight strengths and weaknesses ofthe project/programme.7
MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation Report8Health care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs inthe Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585)6. RECOMMENDATIONSRecommendations follow from the conclusions and they should be discussed andagreed upon by the stakeholders. They should be practical and feasible and directedtowards the intended users of the report to inform of the actions to be taken.Recommendations should address sustainability and discuss continuation, termination or appropriate exit strategies, if applicable.7. LESSONS LEARNTLessons learnt may include knowledge gained from the intervention, the project, thecontext, the implementation methods, the evaluation methods etc. and that is applicable to a similar context.Lessons learnt result from the conclusions and can be subdivided e.g. in strategic,policy, sector, management, implementation relevant lessons learnt.They may also include examples of Good Practices.8. ANNEXES Composition and independence of the evaluation teamLog frame (original and latest version, if applicable);Evaluation matrixProcess and schedule of the evaluation;List of key informants and sites visited;Sources referenceAdditional methodology-related documentation such as instruments used in theevaluation (questionnaires, surveys, focus group guides, discussion guide etc.),reports prepared for the field study;Minutes of the meetings on siteList of supporting documents reviewed;Information regarding the evaluators (summarised CVs),Signed Code of Conduct.Others as needed8
1 MI Syria / Turkey – Evaluation Report Health care and water, sanitation and hygiene measures for IDPs in the Idlib region of north-west Syria (P2585) Recommended Template for Evaluation Report The evaluation team uses this template to guide their evaluation report. They shoul
Summary v Preface viii 1 Introduction 1 2 Background 2 3 Historical and Geostrategic Context 5 4 Turkey, the Kurds, and Relations with Iraq 8 5 Turkey and Iran 12 6 Turkey, Syria, and the Water Crisis 16 7 Turkey and the Middle East Peace Process 20 8 Conclusion: Turkey’s Future Role in the Middle East 23 Conference P
The maximun group size while turkey hunting is five hunters. While turkey hunting, a weapon may not be in possession within 300 feet of a baited area. You may hunt turkey from a blind or tree stand. Turkey hunters may harvest coyotes incidentally prior to harvesting their daily bag limit of turkey. Report coyote harvest by phone .
lessons learned in Syria. Russian military exercises since 2015 have insti-tutionalized and refined adaptations to lessons from Syria. Russian discussions on learning from Syria evolved rapidly from 2015 to 2020, and many adaptations discussed in this report have likely been incorporated into doctrine, including in Russia’s
The strategies Turkey has employed in Syria have boosted the country's image and inter-national role. These operations have secured a seat for Turkey at the negotiating table with . Armed Forces took Afrin in less than a week in March 2018. . Northeastern Turkish-Syrian border between the towns of Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ain
Turkey Trot traditions. This includes a growing number of North Texas communities, both large and small, most notably the Dallas Turkey Trot - Capital One Bank Dallas YMCA Turkey Trot, est. 1968, and the Fort Worth Turkey Trot -Moritz FW YMCA Turkey Trot, est. 1982.
6 Annex 1 Terms of reference Evaluation Office TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE UNFPA 5TH COUNTRY PROGRAMME OF ASSISTANCE TO THE GOVERNMENT OF TURKEY (2011-2015) 1. INTRODUCTION The Evaluation Office is planning to conduct the independent evaluation of the UNFPA 5th Country Programme of Assistance to the Government of Turkey in 2014 as part of its annual work plan, and in
1 turkey, about 14 pounds 1/4 cup unsalted butter, melted 1-1/3 cups chicken stock Ingredients Cooking Directions Preheat oven to 325 F. Season inside of turkey cavity with salt and pepper to taste. Pat skin dry with paper towels. Brush turkey with melted butter. Place turkey on a roasting rack inside a roasting pan. Roast turkey about 20 .
approaches to the subject of reconstruction in archaeological illustration, and other media i.e. films. Method(s) of teaching: The module comprises: A weekly practical session (2hrs) where tutor will introduce different materials and recorded graphic data to be drawn. 1 x lecture Visit and meet with archaeological illustrators and graphic designers in their workplace Method of assessment: The .
