Vibration Isolation: Use And Characterization

2y ago
14 Views
4 Downloads
6.17 MB
136 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Adele Mcdaniel
Transcription

ReferenceNBSPubli cationsNBS HANDBOOK128US. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of StandardsVIBRATION ISOLATION:Use and Characterization1. U51no.1979128

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDSThe National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. TheBureau’s overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation’s science and technology andfacilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conductsresearch and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation’s physical measurement system, (2) scientificand technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity intrade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau’s technical work isperformed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory,and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology.THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system ofphysical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurementsystems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniformphysical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation’s scientific community, industry,and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement,standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educationalinstitutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other GovernmentAgencies; develops, produces, and distributes Standard Reference Materials; and providescalibration services. The Laboratory consists of the following centers:Absolute Physical Quantities2 — Radiation Research — Thermodynamics andMolecular Science — Analytical Chemistry — Materials Science.THE NATIONAL ENGINEERING LABORATORY provides technology and technicalservices to users in the public and private sectors to address national needs and to solvenational problems in the public interest; conducts research in engineering and applied sciencein support of objectives in these efforts; builds and maintains competence in the necessarydisciplines required to carry out this research and technical service; develops engineering dataand measurement capabilities; provides engineering measurement traceability services;develops test methods and proposes engineering standards and code changes; develops andproposes new engineering practices; and develops and improves mechanisms to transferresults of its research to the utlimate user. The Laboratory consists of the following centers:Applied Mathematics — Electronics and Electrical Engineering2 — MechanicalEngineering and Process Technology2 — Building Technology — Fire Research —Consumer Product Technology — Field Methods.THE INSTITUTE FOR COMPUTER SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY conductsresearch and provides scientific and technical services to aid Federal Agencies in the selection,acquisition, application, and use of computer technology to improve effectiveness andeconomy in Government operations in accordance with Public Law 89-306 (40 U.S.C. 759),relevant Executive Orders, and other directives; carries out this mission by managing theFederal Information Processing Standards Program, developing Federal ADP standardsguidelines, and managing Federal participation in ADP voluntary standardization activities;provides scientific and technological advisory services and assistance to Federal Agencies; andprovides the technical foundation for computer-related policies of the Federal Government.The Institute consists of the following divisions:Systems and Software — Computer Systems Engineering — Information Technology.'Headquarters and Laboratories at Gaithersburg, Maryland, unless otherwise noted;mailing address Washington,D C. 20234.’Some divisions within the center are located at Boulder, Colorado, 80303.The National Bureau of Standards was reorganized, effective April 9, 1978.

VIBRATION ISOLATION:Mtttoiul Burtau of Standnthlibrary, (-01 Admin. Btdf.FEB 1 6 1981Use and CharacterizationJohn C. SnowdonApplied Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park, Pennsylvania 16802Sponsored by theNational Bureau of StandardsDepartment of CommerceWashington, D C. 20234U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Juanita M. Kreps, SecretaryJordan J. Baruch, Assistant Secretary for Science and TechnologyNATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS, Ernest Ambler, DirectorIssued May 1979act

Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 79-600062National Bureau of Standards Handbook 128Nat. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Handb. 128, 129 pages (May 1979)CODEN: NBSHAPU S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICEWASHINGTON: 1979For salo by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, D.C. 20402- Price 4.00Stock Number 003-003-02005-0

PrefaceUnwanted vibrations at even very low levels of acceleration can leadto serious problems in monitoring and control of industrial processes aswell as in the conduct of accurate measurements of many kinds.At higherlevels of acceleration, vibrations can cause structural damage, degradation ofproduct quality, can directly result in human discomfort, and produce airborneacoustical noise.When possible,at the source; however,it is often preferable to control vibrationthis may not be practical if to do so would requirecostly redesign or modification of equipment or structures.Modification ofthe transmission path between a source of vibration energy and the equipmentthat must be protected from excessive vibration is frequently the mostcost-effective means of vibration control.In this handbook, Dr. Snowdon has carefully reviewed, evaluated andsynthesized a large body of literature concerned with the use and thecharacterization of the performance of vibration isolators and has summarizedanalytical and experimental procedures for characterizing the effectiveness ofantivibration mountings.This state-of-the-art review also provides a basisfor further research in the development of improved techniques for evaluationof vibration isolation.We are pleased to make this report available as a resource for designersand users of vibration isolation systems and for scientists and engineers whoare carrying out research on this important topic.John A. Simpson, DirectorCenter for Mechanical Engineeringand Process TechnologyNational Engineering Laboratory

ivAbstractThe results of a search and critical evaluation of the literaturepertinent to both the use and the characterization of the performance ofantivibration mountings for the control of noise and vibration are described.First to be discussed are the static and dynamic properties of rubberlikematerials that are suited for use in antivibration mountings.This isfollowed by analyses of the simple (one-stage) mounting system and itssubsequent, impaired performance when second-order resonances occur eitherin the isolator (wave effects) or in the structure of the mounted itemitself (nonrigid supporting feet).A discussion is then given to theperformance of the compound or two-stage mounting system which possessessuperior isolation properties for high frequencies.Next, the four-poleparameter technique of analysis is described and applied, in general terms,to the characterization of the performance of an antivibration mountingwith wave effects for both the cases where either the supporting foundationor mounted item are nonrigid.The adopted methods for the direct measure ment of antivibration-mounting performance are described, followed by anexplanation of how this same experimental determination of transmissibilitycan also be made using an indirect measurement technique based upon fourpole parameter analysis considerations.Finally, recommendations forfuture work in various areas of research on antivibration mountings aregiven.Key Words:engineering;Antivibration mounting; damping; dynamic properties; industrialisolation; machinery and equipment; mechanical impedance;mechanical vibrations; noise control;isolation.transmissibility; vibrations; vibration

VTable of ContentsPageABSTRACT .ivLIST OF FIGURES. .viINTRODUCTION .11.STATIC PROPERTIES OF RUBBERLIKE MATERIALS .22.DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF RUBBERLIKE MATERIALS .93.SIMPLE MOUNTING SYSTEM .254.SIMPLE MOUNTING SYSTEM -- IMPAIRMENT OF PERFORMANCE .334.1General Discussion .334.2Wave Effects .374.3Nonrigid Flanges .445.COMPOUND MOUNTING SYSTEM .496.FOUR-POLE PARAMETER ANALYSES .586.1Introduction .586.2Characterization of an Antivibration Mounting .686.3Resilient Mounting on Nonrigid Substructures .716.4Nonrigidity of Mounted Item .79EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF TRANSMISSIBILITY .817.1Direct Measurement .817.2Four-Pole Technique (Indirect Measurement).83FUTURE WORK .92ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .94REFERENCES957.8.

viList of FiguresFigurePage1.Simple deformations of a rubberlike material.2.Dependence of the apparent modulus E3.a.natural rubbers of various hardnesses.59.)on shape factor(Refs.S21, 23.).for.(Ref.11.).Equivalence between the damping factor61113Dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulus GQ, and (b) the shearco, 0damping factor 6 q of a rubberlike material on angular frequencyto and temperature 0.7.10employed in this reportand other commonly employed measures of damping.6.6Natural frequency of a simple mounting system versus staticdeflection of the antivibration mount.5.3Stress-strain curves of 40 durometer rubber in compression withvarious shape factors.4.(Ref.(Ref.59.).15Frequency dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulus, and (b) thedamping factor of unfilled natural rubber at 5, 20, and 35 C (41,68, and 95 F).8.(Ref.59.).17Frequency dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulus, and (b) thedamping factor of natural rubber filled with 50 parts by weightof HAF carbon black per 100 parts rubber.(Ref.59.).189. Frequency dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulus, and (b) thedamping factor of an unfilled rubber Thiokol RD.10.(Ref. 59.).19Dependence on vibration amplitude (% shear) of (a) the dynamicshear modulus, and (b) the damping factor of natural rubber filledwith various parts by volume of MPC carbon black per 100 volumesrubber.11.(Ref.144.).21,22Dependence on dynamic shear strain amplitude of the dynamic shearmodulus and damping factor of natural rubber filled with 50 partsby weight of carbon black per 100 parts rubber.(Ref.135.)23

viiFigure12.PageDependence on static stress of the dynamic stiffness and magnifi cation Q (damping factor)* of natural rubber.Excitation fre quency 60 Hz; rubber hardness approximately 50 Shore Durometer.(Ref.96.).2413.Simple mounting system with rubberlike material.2614.Simple mounting system with two- and three-element spring- andviscous-dashpot combinations.15.29Transmissibility of simple mounts on natural rubber, natural rubberfilled with carbon black, and Thiokol RD rubber at 20 C; naturalmounting frequency 5 Hz.16.171.).40 parts by weight of EPC carbon black at 19 C.The dashed curvehas been calculated from Eq.and 6 (Ref.15 assuming that59.).(b) a natural rubber cylinderand (c) a commerical shear mount (dashed curve).35(chain curve),(Ref.164.).36Transmissibility of a simple mount with wave effects calculatedfrom the "long"-rod theory.y 50,(Ref.19.are fre Transmissibility of simple mounts that incorporate (a) a helicalspring (solid curve),18.30Transmissibility of a simple mount of natural rubber filled withquency independent.17.(Ref.Damping factor 6 0.1; mass ratio100, and 250; natural mounting frequency 5 Hz.59.).42Transmissibility calculated from the Love theory of rod vibrationfor simple mounts of unfilled natural rubber, natural rubber filledwith 50 parts by weight of HAF carbon black, and Thiokol RD rubber.Cylindrical mounts have a length-to-diameter ratio of 5; mass ratioY 200; natural mounting frequency 5 Hz.20.(Ref. 59.).43(a) Simple mounting system with an ideally rigid mounted itemsupported via nonrigid (multiresonant) flanges or feet, and (b)a practical example of essentially this case.(Refs.177 and 19.).45,46

viiiFigure21.PageTransmissibility of the simple mounting system of Fig.shear-beam resonances in feet of mounted item.20(a) withMass ratioyrstiffness ratio F - K /K 5, 25, and 100; damping factors 6rand 6C 0.01.r22.(Ref. 40; 0.05K177.).Compound mounting system with a mounted item of mass M , and anintermediate massthat is supported (a) directly, and (b) vianonrigid (multiresonant) flanges or feet.23.5051(a) Compound mounting of 7,700-kg and 36,000-kg diesel generatorson one extensive intermediate mass, and (b) a small-scale compoundmounting with an intermediate masscomprising two cylindricalmasses 10 and a spacer yoke 12 (resilient elements comprise 16).(Refs.24.186 and 217.)Z0.05.(Ref.218.)1 0.1, 0.2, and 1.0; damping factor 5K. .57(a) General four-terminal mechanical system, and (b) system reversedso that input and output terminal pairs are interchanged.26.53,5 Transmissibility of the compound mounting system of Fig. 22(a).Mass ratio 8 M /M25.(a)59Lumped mass obeying Newton's second law, and (b) a masslessspring obeying Hooke's Law.6127.Series connection of6628.Antivibration mount with end plates of masses M and M2 to which thenfour-terminal systems.boundaries of a uniform rodlike sample of rubberlike material areattached.29.(a) Antivibration mount of Fig.mounted item of massM28 isolating the vibration of afrom a nonrigid substructure of arbitraryimpedance Z , and (b) the rigid attachment ofMto the substructureat the same location as in (a).30.6972T. for an item of mass M that is resiliently mounted atoverallJeach corner to a rectangular platelike substructure with simplysupported boundaries and an aspect ratio of 0.5; M is four timesmore massive than the plate.The antivibration mounts are symmetrically

ixFigurePageand favorably located about the plate center, and are terminatedon the plate by lumped masses of total mass m M.The dampingfactors of the mounts and the platelike substructure are 0.05 and0.01, respectively.The dashed curve shows Terau for the samemounting system without the loading masses (m 0).31.(a) Apparatus and (b) electronic equipment used in a direct measure ment of mount nt impedance of a rubber mount (magnitude and phase) asobtained with the apparatus of Fig.34.158.)Proposed apparatus for the indirect measurement of mount trans missibility by a four-pole technique.33.7832.(Ref. 58.).89Quasi transfer impedance of a rubber mount subjected to static loadsof 1780 and 3560 N (180 and 360 kg-force, 400 and 800 lb-force) asobtained with the apparatus of Fig.*32.(Ref. 58.).90

*

1IntroductionThis report is concerned with vibration isolation, with antivibrationmountings (resilient isolators), and with the static and dynamic propertiesof rubberlike materials that are suited for use in antivibration mountings.The design of practical antivibration mounts incorporating rubber or coiledsteel springs is described in Refs.etc.) are described in Refs.1-27; pneumatic isolators (air mounts,5, 28-35.* Throughout the literature, as here,attention is focussed predominantly on the translationalness of antivibration mountings.(vertical) effective However, the two- and three-dimensionalvibration of one- or two-stage mounting systems is addressed in Refs. 4,10,12, 36-56.Following a description of the static and dynamic properties ofrubberlike materials, the performance of the simple or one-stage mountingsystem is analyzed, account being taken of the occurrence of second-orderresonances in the isolator and in the mounted item.In the latter case,as likely in practice, the bulk of the mounted item is assumed to remainmasslike whereas the feet of the item are assumed to be nonrigid (multi resonant) .Discussion is then given to the two-stage or compound mountingsystem, which affords superior vibration isolation at high frequencies.Subsequently, the powerful four-pole parameter technique (Ref.57)isemployed to analyze, in general terms, the performance of an antivibrationmounting with second-order resonances (wave effects) when both the foundationthat supports the mounting system and the machine are nonrigid.The universally adopted method of measuring mount transmissibility isthen described,* Occasionallyfollowed by an explanation of how transmissibility can alsoin this report,trade names are givenin ordertoprovideadequate identification of materials or products.Such identificationdoes not constitute endorsement by the National Bureau of Standards.

2be determined by four-pole parameter techniques based on an apparatus usedby F.Schloss(Ref. 58).The four-pole measurement approach has not beenexploited hitherto, but it is apparently feasible and valuable because itenables mounts to be tested under compressive loads equal to thoseroutinely encountered in service.1.Static Properties of Rubberlike MaterialsThe strain induced in a purely elastic linear material is proportionalto the stress that produces the deformation.As explained in Ref. 59, twofundamental types of deformation that a rubberlike material may experienceare described by two independent elastic moduli.Thus, the shear modulusG describes a shear deformation for which the material does not change involume [Fig.1(a)], and the bulk modulusBdescribes a volume deformationfor which the material does not change in shape [Fig. 1(b)].Rubbers thatdo not contain fine particles of carbon black reinforcement (filler) haveshear and bulk moduli of approximately 0.7 and 103MPa (7 x 106and1 x 1010 dyn/cm or 100 and 10 * psi) .A sample of material sandwiched between plane, parallel, rigid surfacesin the configuration of Fig.1(c)is frequently said to be in compression,but it is not homogeneous compression governed by the bulk modulus B.fact, the mechanical behavior is governed primarily byBInonly when thelateral dimensions of the sample are very large in comparison with thesample thickness[Fig.1(d)].In this event the material changes in bothshape and volume, and the ratio of stress to strain in the material isdescribed by a modulusMgiven byM B (4G/3)* B(1)

3(a)(b)(c)/y////////////////7//7//////////////// /(e)(d)Fig.1Simple deformations of a rubberlike material.(Ref. 59.)

4This is to say the resilience that is normally associated with the rubber like material is not apparent because B » G.If resilience is requiredin this situation, it is necessary to use spaced strips of material or aperforated sheet (Ref.3), thereby leaving the material free to expandlaterally when it is compressed vertically.Also considered must be the other geometric extreme, in which thelateral dimensions of the sample are small in comparison with the samplethickness; namely, the sample is a rod or bar and the stress is appliedalong its axis as in Fig.1(e).In this event the ratio of stress tostrain in the material is governed by the Young's modulus E (approximately2 MPa, 2 x 1072dyn/cm , or300 psi for unfilled rubbers), and the ratioof the resulting lateral to axial strain is described by Poisson's ratiov.For rubbers, it is well known thatE 9 BG/(3B G) « 3G(2)andV [(E/2G) - 1] 0.5.(3)An element of rubberlike material in the configuration of Fig.possesses an apparent modulus of elasticity Evalue to the moduliEandM[Figs.1(c)that is intermediate in1(e) and (d)].The rubberlikematerial is usually bonded to the rigid surfaces between which it iscompressed, in which case (Refs.21,23, 60, 61)it is possible to statethatEE(1 BS2)a[1 (E/B)(1 BS2)](4)

5where the so-called shape factorS(Refs. 3, 5,11,13, 15, 21-23, 26,39, 59-75) is equal to the ratio of the area of one loaded surface to thetotal force-free area, and6is a numerical constant.of a rubber cylinder of diameterDand height is equal to D/4 ; theshape factor of a rectangular rubber block of sides is equal to ab/2 (a b).The shape factoraandband heightFor all samples except those with large lateraldimensions (large shape factors), Eq. 4 can be written asE3 E (1 BS2).(5)Note that because E 3G, the apparent modulus of elasticity E3is some simplenumerical multiple of the shear modulus G.The dependence of the apparent modulus EFig. 2 for rubbers of various hardness (Refs.figure have the form predicted by Eq. 4.3on shape factor is plotted in21, 23).The curves of thisMeasured values of E, G, and B fornatural rubbers of increasing hardness (increasing volume of carbon blackfiller) are listed in Table Ilisted.(Ref.23); the related values ofFor rubbers unfilled by carbon black,3 2.3are alsoEquation 5 is validfor samples that are circular, square, or moderately rectangular in crosssection.However,for a pronounced rectangular rail-type sample--a so-calledcompression strip for which b » a--a companion equation pertains (Refs.21,23); that is,(6)Ea (2/3) E(2 BS2)where S a/2 .Hardness measurements can provide an estimate ofand 3, 5, 11,13, 17, 39, 76, 77).EandG(Refs. 23Hardness is readily measured but is

6Fig.2Dependence of the apparent modulus Eonclshape factorSfor natural rubbers ofvarious hardnesses.(Refs.21, 23.)

Table 1.containing (above 48 IRHD) SRF carbon black as filler.(Ref.23.)Hardness and elastic moduli of natural rubber spring vulcanizates7to r\i03 QtoCDC nJ 2XU XOtoLOtOOoi-LOOfOLOLOLOO\ mdLOr—Or—LO

8subject to some uncertainty, hence the tolerance in the hardnessvalues quoted in Table I.Rubber hardness is essentially a measureof the reversible, elastic deformation produced by a speciallyshaped indentor under a specified load and is therefore relatedto E.Readings in International Rubber Hardness degrees (IRHD) andon the Shore Durometer A scale are approximately the same.Anobjection to such hardness measurements is said to be that bothstress and strain vary throughout the test.Thus, as the indentationproceeds, the load is distributed by an increasing area of contactbetween the indentor and the sample, so causing the average contactpressure to diminish.Creep is the continued deformation (drift) of a rubber understatic load (Refs.23 and 11,12,15, 39, 62, 78-81).When theload is removed, all but a few percent of the original deformationis recovered immediately;may never be achieved.termed permanent set.further recovery takes much longer andThe incompletely recovered deformation isCreep varies linearly with the logarithmof time; for example, the amount of creep occurring in the decadeof time from 1 to 10 minutes after loading is the same as theamount in the decade from 1 to 10 weeks after loading.Creepunder load should not exceed 20% (for 70 IRHD) of the initialdeflection during the first several weeks; only a further 5 - 10%increase in deflection should then occur over a period of manyyears.Load-deflection and stress-strain curves for statically com pressed rubber are referred to throughout the literature (Refs.3,

95,11,13,17,21, 23,76, 77, 82-91).shown in Fig.27,36,39,60, 61, 63, 64, 67, 69, 70, 73, 74,A series of stress-strain curves from Ref.11 is3, which refers to various shape factors and deflectionsup to 50% (a value seldom reached in practice) for a rubber hardnessof 40 Shore Durometer.These data are said not to be limited to onetype of rubber but they do relate to room temperature and to rubbersamples bonded to rigid surfaces as in the manner of an antivibrationmount [Fig.1 (c)].To conclude,it is appropriate to mention that the natural fre quency fQ of a resiliently mounted item (Sec.terms of the static deflectiond3) can be expressed inof the resilient element as follows:f 0.4984/fcT Hz(d meters)f 3.1273/Zd Hz(d inches)(7)orValues of f2.(8)can be read from the straight-line plot of Fig. 4.Dynamic Properties of Rubberlike MaterialsThe dynamic properties of rubberlike materials that experience sinu soidal vibration are readily accounted for by writing the elastic moduli

101000600400COMPRESSION STRESS (psi)8002000Fig.3Stress-strain curves of 40 durometer rubber incompression with various shape factors.(Ref.11.)

11I0.01li0.02i i i i i i I L I0.050.10.2II I0.51 1 1J-1-J1.02lJ5.U-l-lJ10STATIC DEFLECTION, d (cm)Fig. 4Natural frequency of a simple mounting system versus staticdeflection of the antivibration mount.

12that govern the vibration as complex quantities (Ref. 59).For example,the Young’s modulus and the shear modulus are most generally writtenE. E0 (1 (0,0(0,0.)E(o,0(9)G0 GQ(0,0(0,0(1 j 5JG(O,0(10)andHere, the star superscripts denote complex quantities and j /-I; the socalled dynamic moduli E and*Eq are the real parts of the complex moduli*Q and G0 , and Sandn are the so-called damping or loss factorsassociated with the Young's modulus and shear deformations of the material.The subscriptsfactors are,ture 0.ooand0in general,indicate that the dynamic moduli and dampingfunctions of both angular frequencyooand tempera The damping factors are equal to the ratios of the imaginary to thereal parts of the complex moduli, and are directly equivalent to the reciprocalof the quality factorQthat is employed in electrical circuit theory todescribe the ratio of an inductive reactance to a resistance.The dampingfactors are also equivalent to other commonly employed measures of dampingsuch as those listed in Fig. 5.There is nothing magical in the concept of a complex modulus--it meansonly that strain lags in phase behind stress in the rubberlike material byan angle the tangent of which is the damping factor 6 or 6 q.Thedamping factors % 1.0 for "high-damping" rubbers, and « 0.1 or less for"low-damping" rubbers--in which case the dynamic moduli and damping factorsvary only slowly with frequency through the audio-frequency range at roomtemperature, as will be illustrated subsequently.

13DAMPING FACTOR 6 LOSS FACTOR 7? or TAN 6 2 (DAMPING RATIO C/C )c (1/tt) (LOGARITHMIC DECREMENT) (1/2tt) (SPECIFIC DAMPING CAPACITY) l/(QUALITY FACTOR Q) (RESONANT BANDWIDTH)/uQ(PROVIDED THAT THE DAMPING FACTOR IS LESS THAN APPROXIMATELY 0.3)Fig.5Equivalence between the damping factor6employedin this report and other commonly employed measuresof damping.

14For rubberlike materials, the complex shear and Young's moduli exhibitthe same frequency dependence (Ref.E0),59); that is to say,Q 3 G„0CO, 0(IDand(12)6Eoo,0 6Goo,eThe dynamic moduli of Eq.11 are found experimentally to increase in valuewhen frequency increases or when temperature decreases.visualized by reference to Fig.This is best6, where, for example, the dynamic modulusG q and damping factor 5 q are shown diagrammatically as a function ofangular frequency co (hereafter referred to simply as frequency) and tempera ture 0.The transition frequency coand temperature 0refer to the transi tion of rubberlike materials at sufficiently high frequencies or sufficientlylow temperatures to an "inextensible" or glasslike state, G g becoming solarge that the characteristic resilience of the material is no longerapparent.At the so-called rubber-to-glass transition, the damping factorpasses through a maximum value that lies approximately in the frequency ortemperature range through which GQ is increasing most rapidly.co, 0Much effort has been expended over the years to develop test apparatusto yield values of the dynamic moduli and their associated damping factors(Refs.13,17,21, 66,75, 92-119).One apparatus has been particularlycriticized (Refs. 110, 120-127), but for soft rubberlike materials and datarecorded away from regions of fluctuating response, the results obtained arethought to be reliable.Any single piece of apparatus is limited in that dynamic measurementscannot be made through an extensive frequency range; however, it is generally

15(b)Fig. 6Dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulusqand (b) the shear damping factor 5 q f arubberlike material on angular frequencytemperature 0.(Ref.59.)wand

16straightforwardto make measurements through a wide temperature range.Then,with a well-established technique known as the method of reduced variables,the dynamic moduli and damping factors can be predicted through a very broadfrequency range at a single temperature of interest such as room temperature.The method of reduced variables (Ref.59), although originally semiempirical,is now well validated both by theory and by successful usage.Examples of data established in the foregoing way (Ref. 59) are re produced in Figs.7-9, where the dynamic shear moduli and damping factors ofunfilled natural rubber, natural rubber filled with 50 parts by weight ofhigh-abrasion furnace (HAF) black, and Thiokol RD rubber are plotted versusfrequency in the audio frequency range 1 Hz - 10 kHz at 5 C, 20 C, and 35 C.Other measurements of the dynamic shear and Young's moduli and theirassociated damping factors are reported in Refs.94-96, 99,100,102,104,105,108,21, 59, 62, 65, 73, 79, 86, 92,110, 111, 116-118,128-142.Rubbers are reinforced with carbon black to increase their stiffness,tear resistance, and abrasion resistance--to an extent that depends on thetype of black utilized.Furnace, channel,lamp, and thermal blacks cover awide range of particle sizes; furnace and channel blacks are the most finelydivided.Note that the presence of carbon black (1) has increased thedynamic shear modulus of the natural rubber of Fig. 8 by a factor ofapproximately 10 above that of the unfilled rubber of Fig.7, and (2) hasincreased the value of the damping factor, particularly at low frequencies.It should be recognized, however, that the addition of carbon black mayreduce the damping factor significantly at frequencies above the rangeconsidered here.Although GQ andco y yQ increase only by a factor of two or three at(jgq y yroom temperature through the four decades in frequency considered in Fig. 8,it is well to remember this fact if satisfactory engineering design is to

175 x 106——NATUF?AL R UBBER—2Gw,e(Pa)5 C — 1 x 106—20 C —5—1 x 10'5 x 10* Lj LL MIL 1101mu 1 L L MM150I02III. LLLi5*I02I035xl02I035* I03I04ggj.0FREQUENCY (Hz)(a)51050I025XI03 I04FREQUENCY (Hz)(b)Fig. 7Frequency dependence of (a) the dynamic shear modulus,

of vibration isolation. We are pleased to make this report available as a resource for designers and users of vibration isolation systems and for scientists and engineers who are carrying out research on this important topic. John A. Simpson, Director Center for Mechanical Engineering and Process Technology National Engineering Laboratory

Related Documents:

PASSION AND ISOLATION 17 3. FAMILY AND ISOLATION 55 4. FEMININE INDEPENDENCE AND ISOLATION 77 5. SOCIAL ISSUES AND ISOLATION 130 6. CONCLUSION: ISOLATION AND WRITING AS RESISTANCE 167 . in his reworking of John Donne's "Meditation XVII" ("No man is an island ."), apply to the significance of creative writing. We can similarly compare .

Gate Driver Providing Galvanic isolation Series. Isolation voltage 2500Vrms. 1ch Gate Driver Providing Galvanic . Isolation BM6104FV-C. General Description. The BM6104FV-C is a gate driver with isolation voltage . 2500Vrms, I/O delay time of 150ns, and minimum input pulse width of 90ns, and incorporates the fault signal

THEORY OF SHELLS VIBRATION AND STABILITY Course Outline PART 1 Waves and vibration I. Introduction 1. Plane waves a. Vibration b. Wave propagation 2. Beam with and without an elastic foundation 3. Ring, extensional and inextensional vibration II. Circular Plate 1. Waves and vibration in rectangular coordinates 2.

The vibration analysis in Section 5 provides the FE-based vibration analysis procedure based on first principles direct calculations. The FE-based vibration analysis is recommended to evaluate the design during the detail design stage. If found necessary, the local vibration is tobe addressed in the detail vibration analysis. The

Characterization: Characterization is the process by which the writer reveals the personality of a character. The personality is revealed through direct and indirect characterization. Direct characterization is what the protagonist says and does and what the narrator implies. Indirect characterization is what other characters say about the

The isolation rooms The two isolation rooms, together with their associated air lock, are shown in Fig. 2. Isolation room no. 1 had an air supply of 393/min0 ft. and isolation room no. 2 had 240 ft.3/min. These rates were the same as the alternative supply rates to the treatment room. The air lock had a constant suppl3y/min of. Pass 630 ft.-

Isolation Bases - Type B2 Isolation steel bases consist of formed steel members welded into a rigid one piece base. Motor slide rails are included where applicable. Bases are required for all arrangement 1 and 3 fans with independently mounted motors (MOB). Isolation bases are available without isolators, with rubber mounts or with spring mounts.

A Primer on Automotive EMC for Non-EMC Engineers The automotive industry has changed drastically in recent years. Advancements in technology paired with tighter federal fuel and emissions regulations have resulted in the need to place more electrical systems into vehicles. This in turn places a greater emphasis on keeping the Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) of these systems from interfering .