DOCUMENT RESUMEED 390 577AUTHORTITLEPUB DATENOTEPUB TYPEEDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORSPS 023 906Egelson, Pauline E.Student and Teacher Reflections Regarding WritingPortfolios in the Elementary Classroom.20 Apr 9512p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of theAmerican Educational Research Association (SanFrancisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995).Research/Technical (143)ReportsSpeeches/Conference Papers (150)MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.Age Differences; Elementary Education; ElementarySchool Students; Elementary School Teachers;Evaluation Criteria; Evaluation Methods; EvaluationProblems; *Portfolio Assessment; *ProgramEffectiveness; School Surveys; *Student Attitudes;*Teacher Attitudes; *Writing AssignmentsABSTRACTThis study examined the attitudes of elementaryschool teachers and students toward portfolio assessment. A total of11 teachers and 116 students in grades 3 through 5 responded toopen-ended questions regarding the benefits of portfolios forhighlighting students' written work. Teachers were asked about thestrengths and weaknesses of portfolio assessment and their benefitsfor teachers and students, while the students were asked about thestandards they employed for selecting their best writing (whichappeared in a student literary magazine) and how they might improvethe work they selected. The study found that while some teachersnoted that they did not have enough time to manage portfolios, mostlisted numerous benefits for both teachers and students in using thisassessment technique. Portfolio assessment also revealed thatstudents standards for their writing differed according to age.Younger students noted the length of their selection or the presenceof humor as the main criteria, while older students cited theirinterest in l-he essay topic or its meaning to them as the mostimportant selection criteria. Summaries of selected teacher andstudent responses are provided. (MDM)*Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER 'ERICgThis GLiCuiheitt hasreceived Iron the persiiiioriginating it0 Moor change., nave t,, , ",tI4.S stuvitPrArts tit vie:,Student and Teacher Reflections Regarding Writing Portfoliosin the Elementary ClassroomPresented at theAmerican Educational Research Association Annual MeetingSan Francisco, CaliforniaApril 20, 1995PERM:-'-',i0":PENICOUCE. I HiSMATI 4L HA., BEEN (iRANTLD BY1?.1.50nI.,ITi-tiL:",al7-1f41.Pauline E. EgelsonSouthEastern Regional Vision for EducationUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro201 Ferguson BuildingGreensboro, North Carolina 27412BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Student and Teacher Reflections Regarding Student Portfolios in theElementary ClassroomBACKGROUND INFORMATIONTeachers and students located in a small southeasternelementary school (330 K-5th grade students) developed studentwriting portfolios over the course of the 1993-94 school year.Theproject was coordinated by two parent volunteers associated withthe school's parent group.Each month students selected their bestwriting work to be placed in individual folders.Teachers agreedto help the students manage the portfolios during the project.Parent coordinators sent reminders to teachers about maintainingthe portfolios throughout the year.At the conclusion of the year,each student selected one piece of work to be included in theschool's literary magazine.In late May, students and teacherswere asked to respond in written form about their experiences withthe portfolio project.THEORYPortfolios for students are being used more frequently aseducators search for ways to better document what students know andcan do, show student development, promote student self-reflection,and integrate instruction and assessment (Arter & Spandel, 1992).A student portfolio can be defined as a purposeful collection ofstudent work that tells the story of a student's efforts, progress,or achievement in a given area (Northwest Evaluation Association,1990).There are two types of portfoliosassessment portfolios (Vavrus, 1990).showcase portfolios andShowcase portfolios areStudent assessment portfolioscollections of students' best work.31
are evaluated against predetermined standards.Students participating in this project developed showcaseportfolios. They were instructed to select their best writing workeach month to place in their portfolios.K-2 teachers assistedtheir students with this process; 3rd through 5th graders selectedtheir own writing samples.Project purposes were to documentstudent growth, promote student self-reflection, and havea sample of the student's best work for the literary magazine.METHODSAt the close of the project, teachers (n 11) and third, fourthand fifth grade students (n 116) responded in written form toseveral open-ended questions related to the portfolio project.Forthe 3rd through 5th grades, there were approximately 40 studentsfrom each grade level who responded to the questions.Somerespondents chose not to answer every question and others gave morethan one response to a question.Teacher questions focused onportfolio management/improvement issues and portfolio benefits forteachers and students.The teacher questions were:For you, what were the difficulties in maintainingstudent portfolios?What are the benefits of portfolios for teachers?What are the benefits of portfolios for students?How could the portfolio project be improved?Student questions centered specifically on their writing work asit related to portfolios -- standards for selecting their best workand improving "best" work.Student questions were:Why did you chose this story for the literary magazine?2
If you could change your story, what would you do?The overall themes were: portfolio management/improvement,teacher and student portfolio benefits, standards, quality control.The responses were placed under the appropriate themes.Theseresponses told the story of the portfolio project at theelementary school.FINDINGSTEACHERS (N 11)MANAGEMENT/IMPROVEMENT ISSUESFor teachers, two of the questions focused on theportfolio project difficulties and how those problems could beresolved.Three teachers noted that they did not have enough time tomanage portfolios.Managing included placing selections inportfolios, conferencing and assessing work with students.Three primary (K-2) teachers responded that it was difficultto get original writing work from some students.These students were not at a point where they couldindependently put their thoughts on paper.One teacher had to monitor whether her students were placingwriting work in their portfolios each month.A teacher reported that she wanted to send portfolios homewith students to show to their parents, but was afraid to doso for fear that the portfolios would not be returned.Three teachers felt the portfolio process could be improved ifparents volunteers could assist with management concerns --placing selections in portfolios, assisting students withputting their thoughts on paper, helping with the editingprocess.For primary teachers, the issues of students needingassistance with the writing process, conferencing, maintainingportfolios, and allowing students to take portfolios home toparents were issues.Primary teachers noted that some of theirconcerns could be resolvedifthey had volunteer help in the3
classroom.TEACHER BENEFITSTeachers were asked how the student portfolios were helpfulfor them.Three teachers saw portfolios as clear evidence of studentgrowth.Two teachers saw portfolios as a means of informally assessingstudents.Two teachers thought it was beneficial to share studentportfolios with parents in a conference setting.A teacher believed portfolios were usefulin showing howvarious writing techniques were taught.One primary teacher could see progress in students' fine motorskills and language development.A teacher reported that portfolios were easier to use thanthe journals she had used in the past.STUDENT BENEFITSTeachers were asked how the portfolios were helpful forstudents.Seven teachers stated that students could see their growth,progress, learning during the year.Five teachers reported that portfolios were away for studentsto informally self-evaluate their own work.One teacher remarked that students enjoyed seeing samples oftheir work over time.The goals of the portfolio project were met; student growthwas documented throughout the school year and students were able toinformally self-evaluate their work. Pluses included documentationof student skills for teachers and students enjoying seeingsamples of their work throughout the school year.
STUDENTS (N.116)STANDARDSThe following excerpts are highlights of student responsesto two questions.For a detailed breakdown of student responses,see the tables following the quality control section.Studentswere asked why they chose the selection they did for the literarymagazine.Three 5th grade students and five 3rd grade student could notwrite beyond "because it was good"(even though had beeninstructed to do so) when asked to describe why they chose aparticular writing selection for the literary magazine.Seventeen 3rd graders chose the selection they did becausethey felt others would find it funny.Five 3rd graders thought length of the writing selection wasimportant when making a decision about what should go in theliterary magazine.There were 16 5th graders and nine 4th graders who chose theselection they did for the literary magazine because theyliked the topic.this way.There were no 3rd graders that responded inEight 5th graders selected the story they did because it wasmeaningful.Only two 3rd graders and two 4th gradersresponded similarly.Standards for what/as good selection for the literarymagazine changed as students got older.Third graders weremore concerned about meeting external standards than 5th graders.The younger students noted that the length of their selectionsand/or the presence of humor were reasons for placing them in theliterary magazine.Perhaps because older students had moreconfidence in their writing abilities and the process, theirstandards were more internally motivated; they were concerned thatthey have an interest in the topic and/or the topic having meaningfor them.r,
QUALITY CONTROLWhen students were asked how they would change their literarymagazine selections, their responses were surprising.Five 3rd graders, five 4th graders, and four 5th graders saidthey would change the topic.Two 3rd graders, four 4th graders, and three 5th graders wouldmake their selection shorter or longer.Two 3rd graders and three 5th graders would add illustrations.Three 4th graders would use rliffe:ent words.Three 4th graders would make their selections more exciting.Two 5th graders would add more detail.Since each student had at least 10 selections to chose from intheir portfolios, it is puzzling why some 3rd, 4th, and 5th graderswould feel the need to change their writing selection topic.Students across the board were concerned about selection length.Use of particular words, making selections more exciting, andadding detail demonstrate that students are aware of the writingprocess.IMPLICATIONSTeachers associated with this portfolio project saw thebenefits -- a documentation of student growth available tostudents, parents, and teachers, an opportunity forstudents to critique their work, and a tool for assessinginstructional techniques.Students were capable of making choicesabout what is their best work; standards changed depending on theage of the student.Portfolios appeared to be easier to implementin classrooms where the students were older and more independent.Negatives associated with this project -- like a6
TableWhy did you choose this writing selection from your portfolio for the Literary Magazine?Student Responses3rd Grade StudentsScary1Good h Grade Students5th Grade Students233Young children willlike itIInformative21Like the topic916Interesting3Teacher liked it1DetailI1Meaningful228Didn't care what I chose2Worked hard on it1-Well-written3Fantasy17
Table 2If you could change your writing selection, what would you do?StudentResponses3rd GradeStudents4th GradeStudentsScarier11Different words13Write a poem1Topic change554Shorter or longer243More exciting131Add pictures2Neater1Better handwriting15th GradeStudents32More detail12Change characters1More descriptive1198
lack of teacher time and younger students being unable to managethe portfolios independently -- have been issues for educatorsacross the country as they develop portfolio plans.Considerations for streamlining the portfolio processand having support in primary classrooms to organize portfoliosshould be priorities as educators begin portfolio initiatives.9
REFERENCESArter, J. & Spandel, V. (1992 Spring). Using portfolios of studentwork in instruction and assessment. Educational Measurement:Issues and Practice. p.36Northwest Evaluation Association. (1990). Aggregating portfoliodata: a working retreat.Lake Oswego, OR:Author.Vavrus, L. (1990, August). Put portfolios to the test. Instructorpp. 48-53121 0
ED 390 577 PS 023 906 AUTHOR Egelson, Pauline E. TITLE Student and Teacher Reflections Regarding Writing. Portfolios in the Elementary Classroom. PUB DATE 20 Apr 95 NOTE 12p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the. American Educational Research Association (San Francisco, CA, April 18-22, 1995). PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143)
LDAP on OS/390 Server packaged as part of the OS/390 Security Server Client packaged as part of the OS/390 base prior to OS/390 2.8 With OS/390 2.8, both server and client packaged as part of the OS/390 Security Server, always enabled Many possibilities for OS/390 server configuration: sysplex, multiserver, or single server DB2, RACF, or both
is just “starting out” then the 390 is for you. This is Graco’s lightest professional sprayer weighing in at only 30 lb! The 390 is the ideal sprayer for residential jobs because it is so lightweight and portable. Hands down the 390 is the best value in small electric sprayers. 390 390 DESCRIPTION PART #: 390 Stand 253958 390 Hi-Boy 262019
Consumed Alcoholic Beverage While Operating Vehicle 577.017 Load Not Secured / Covered 307.010, 307.400 Local Log Truck / Truck Tractor 301.010 MDOT 390.051, 390.061, 390.063, 390.066 Mentally Disordered Person — Detained 632.305 Metal-tired Vehicles 304.250 Mirrors 307.170, 307.400 Missing Person NONE Motor Carrier Cab Card Violations 390.041
Waters (SNP): 07703887170 Community Giffnock Library: 0141 577 4976 Eastwood Recreation Centre: 0141 577 4956 Giffnock Soccer Centre: 0747 308 0800 28th Glasgow (Giffnock) Scout Group: 0141 638 0282 Schools Our Lady of the Missions Primary School: 0141 570 7280 St. Ninians High School:0141 577 2000 Woodfarm High School: 0141 577 2600 Churches .
Microbiological Incubator VWR INCU-Line IL 10 VWR INCU-Line IL 23 VWR INCU-Line IL 56 INSTRUCTION MANUAL European Catalogue Numbers: 390-0384 IL 10 digital, transparent door window 390-0385 IL 10 digital, opaque door window 390-0482 IL 23 digital, transparent door window 390-0999 IL 56 digital, transparent door window Version: 10
IBM Tivoli Decision Support for OS/390 was previously known as IBM Tivoli Performance Reporter. The term z/OS is used in this book to mean z/OS and OS/390 operating systems. Where the term OS/390 does appear, the related information applies only to OS/390 operating systems. The terms MVS and OS
Description Quantity Cat. No. Extra shelf, 226 x 215 mm, stainless steel 1 390-0387 Tube rack, 2 x 6 positions, Ø 32 mm 1 390-0386 IL 23: Description Quantity Cat. No. Extra shelf, 286 x 285 mm, stainless steel 1 390-0483 Tube rack, 2 x 6 positions, Ø 32 mm 1 390-0386 IL 56: Description Quantity Cat. No.
Course Title: Basics Engineering Drawing (Code: 3300007) Diploma Programmes in which this course is offered Semester in which offered Automobile Engineering, Ceramic Engineering, Civil Engineering, Environment Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechatronics Engineering, Metallurgy Engineering, Mining