Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts, Second Edition

3y ago
80 Views
5 Downloads
2.39 MB
550 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Matteo Vollmer
Transcription

Cinema Studies:The Key ConceptsThis is the essential guide for anyone interested in film. Now in itssecond edition, the text has been completely revised and expanded tomeet the needs of today’s students and film enthusiasts. Some 150 keygenres, movements, theories and production terms are explained andanalysed with depth and clarity. Entries include: auteur theoryBlack CinemaBritish New Wavefeminist film theoryintertextualitymethod actingpornographyThird World CinemaWar filmsA bibliography of essential writings in cinema studies completes anauthoritative yet accessible guide to what is at once a fascinating areaof study and arguably the greatest art form of modern times.Susan Hayward is Professor of French Studies at the University ofExeter. She is the author of French National Cinema (Routledge, 1998)and Luc Besson (MUP, 1998).

Also available from Routledge Key GuidesAncient History: Key Themes and ApproachesNeville MorleyCinema Studies: The Key Concepts (Second edition)Susan HaywardEastern Philosophy: Key ReadingsOliver LeamanFifty Eastern ThinkersDiané CollinsonFifty Contemporary ChoreographersEdited by Martha BremserFifty Key Contemporary ThinkersJohn LechteFifty Key Jewish ThinkersDan Cohn-SherbokFifty Key Thinkers on HistoryMarnie Hughes-WarringtonFifty Key Thinkers in International RelationsMartin GriffithsFifty Major PhilosophersDiané CollinsonKey Concepts in Cultural TheoryAndrew Edgar and Peter SedgwickKey Concepts in Eastern PhilosophyOliver LeamanKey Concepts in Language and LinguisticsR. L. TraskKey Concepts in the Philosophy of EducationJohn Gingell and Christopher WinchKey Concepts in Popular MusicRoy ShukerKey Concepts in Post-Colonial StudiesBill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths and Helen TiffinSocial and Cultural Anthropology: The Key ConceptsNigel Rapport and Joanna Overing

Cinema Studies:The Key ConceptsSecond editionSusan HaywardLondon and New York

First published 2000 by Routledge11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EESimultaneously published in the USA and Canadaby Routledge29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis GroupThis edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. 2000 Susan HaywardAll rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced orutilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, nowknown or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or inany information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writingfrom the publishersBritish Library Cataloguing in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British LibraryLibrary of Congress Cataloging in Publication DataA catalogue record for this book has been requestedISBN 0-415-22739-9 (hbk)ISBN 0-415-22740-2 (pbk)ISBN 0-203-12994-6 Master e-book ISBNISBN 0-203-17993-5 (Glassbook Format)

For my students.

CONTENTSPreface to the first ediitionixAcknowledgementsxiList of Key ConceptsKEY CONCEPTSxiii1Bibliography476Index of Films495Name Index505Subject Index517vii

PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITIONKey Concepts in Cinema Studies has been two years in the writing. Itis intentionally an in-depth glossary which, it is hoped, will providestudents and teachers of film studies and other persons interested incinema with a useful reference book on key theoretical terms and,where appropriate, the various debates surrounding them. The glossaryalso gives historical overviews of key genres, film theory and filmmovements. Naturally, not ‘everything’ is covered by these entries. Ina later edition further entries may be included, and I would welcomesuggestions of further entries from readers. The present book is basedon my perception of students’ needs when embarking on film studies;its intention is also to give teachers synopses for rapid referencepurposes. Entries have been written as lucidly and as succinctly aspossible, but doubtless there will be some ‘dense’ areas; again Iwelcome feedback. My own students have been very helpful in thisarea.All cross-references are in bold. Sometimes the actual conceptcross-referred may not be the precise form in the entry (for example,ideological in bold actually refers to an entry on ideology).Bibliographical citations at the end of certain entries refer to thebibliography at the end of the book. Wherever it is useful to explain theparticular relevance or direction of a suggested text, this has beendone. Cross-references and bibliographies are given in order ofimportance wherever this seemed significant, otherwise in alphabeticalorder.Finally, instead of a table of contents in traditional style I havesupplied a list of all concepts dealt with in this book. Where a conceptis part of a larger issue, the entry is a cross-reference to the main entrywhere it is discussed (thus, ‘jouissance’ is entered under the ‘J’ entriesix

Preface to the first editionbut as a cross-reference to ‘psychoanalysis’ where it is explained. Atthe beginning of most entries there is a parenthesis suggesting thatyou consult other entries – I believe you will find this dipping acrossuseful and that it will help widen the issue at hand.x

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMy thanks for the Second Edition extend to Jacqueline Maingard forher help on certain entries (specifically Postcolonial Theory, ThirdCinema, Third World Cinema); to my mother Kathleen Hayward for herassistance on the Bibliography. All other thanks remain the same. Thus,I would like to thank various people who have helped this projectalong. First, Rebecca Barden, my editor, whose unfailing enthusiasmfor the project has made it such an enjoyable book to write. Second,colleagues, students and Routledge readers who put a lot of effort intogiving me feedback on the different entries. Third, I must express mythanks to the British Film Institute for its existence and the extremelyhelpful librarians who made my task that much easier. My thanks forthe First Edition also go to Professor Jennifer Birkett for making timeavailable to complete the project.xi

LIST OF KEY anamorphic lensanimationapparatusart cinemaaspect ratioasynchronization/asynchronous soundaudienceauteur/auteur theory/politique des auteurs/Cahiersdu cinémaavant-gardeBbackstage musical see musicalBlack cinema – UKBlack cinema/Blaxploitation movies – USAB-moviesbody horror films see horror filmsBritish New Wavebuddy filmsxiii

List of key conceptsCCahiers du cinéma group see auteur/auteur theory, FrenchNew Wavecastration/decapitation see psychoanalysiscensorshipcinema nôvocinemascopecinéma-véritéclassclassic canons see codes and conventionsclassic Hollywood cinema/classic narrative cinema/classical narrative cinemacodes and conventions/classic canonscolourcomedyconnotation see denotation/connotationcontent see form/contentcontinuity editingcostume dramascounter-cinema/oppositional cinemacrime thriller, criminal films see film noir, gangster/criminaldetective thriller, private-eye films, thrillercross-cuttingcutDdecapitation see castration/decapitationdeconstructiondeep focus/depth of fielddenotation/connotationdepth of field see deep focusdesire see fantasy, flashbacks, narrative, spectator, stars,subjectivitydetective thriller see gangster egetic/extra- and intra-diegeticdirectordirector of photographydiscoursedisruption/resolutionxiv

List of key arydollying shot see tracking shotdominant/mainstream cinemaEediting/Soviet montageellipsisemblematic shotenunciationepicsEuropean cinemaeyeline matchingexcessexpressionism see German expressionismFfadefantasy/fantasy filmsfemale spectator see spectatorfeminist film theoryfetishism see film noir, voyeurism/fetishismfilm industry see Hollywood, studio systemfilm noirfilm theory see e British CinemaFrench New Wave/Nouvelle VagueFrench poetic realismfuturismGgangster/criminal/detective thriller/private-eye filmsgaze/lookgenderxv

List of key conceptsgenre/sub-genreGerman expressionismGermany/New German cinemagesturalitygothic horror see horrorHHammer horror see horrorHays codehegemonyhistorical films/reconstructionsHollywoodHollywood blacklistHollywood majors see classic Hollywood cinema, studio systemhorror/gothic horror/Hammer horror/horrorthriller/body horror/vampire moviesIiconographyidentification see distanciation, spectator-identificationidentity see psychoanalysis, spectator-identification, dent cinemaintertextualityItalian neo-realismJjouissance see psychoanalysisjump cutLlap dissolve see dissolvelightinglook see gaze/look, imaginary/symbolic, scopophilia, suturexvi

List of key conceptsMmainstream cinema see dominant/mainstream cinemamatchcuttingmediationmelodrama and women’s filmsmetalanguagemetaphor see metonymy/metaphormethod emisrecognition see psychoanalysis, suturemodernismmontage see editing, Soviet uralizingnaturalismneo-realism see Italian neo-realismNew German cinema see Germany/New German cinemaNew Wave/Nouvelle Vague see French New WaveOOedipal trajectory180-degree ruleopposition see narrative, sequencingoppositional cinema see counter-cinemaPparadigmatic/syntagmatic see structuralism/post-structuralismparallel reversalparallel sequencing see editingpatriarchy see Imaginary/Symbolic, Oedipal trajectory,psychoanalysisxvii

List of key conceptsperformance see gesturality, star systemplot/story see classical Hollywood cinema, discourse, narrativepoint of view/subjectivity see subjective camera, subjectivitypolitique des auteurs see auteur, French New Wave, mise-en-scènepornographypostcolonial theorypostmodernismpost-structuralism see structuralism/post-structuralismpreferred readingpresence see absence/presenceprivate-eye films see gangster filmsproducerprojection see apparatus, psychoanalysisprojector see apparatuspsychoanalysispsychological thriller see thrillerQQueer cinemaRrealismreconstructions see historical filmsrepetition/variation/opposition see narration, sequencingrepresentation see feminist film theory, gender, sexuality,stereotypes, subjectivityresistances see avant-garde, counter-cinemareverse-angle shot see shot/reverse-angle shotroad movierules and rule-breaking see counter-cinema, jump cutSscience fiction filmsscopophilia/scopic drive/visual pleasureseamlessnesssemiology/semiotics/sign and iii

List of key conceptsshotsshot/reverse-angle shotsign/signification see semiology/semioticssocial realismsound/soundtrackSoviet cinema/schoolSoviet montage see editing, Soviet cinemaspace and time/spatial and temporal e spectatorstars/star system/star as capital value/star asconstruct/star as deviant/star as cultural value: signand fetish/stargazing and ismstudio systemsubject/objectsubject/subjectivitysubjective camerasurrealismsuturesyntagmatic see paradigmaticTtheoryThird CinemaThird World Cinemas30-degree rulethriller/psychological thrillertime and space see spatial/temporal contiguitytracking shot/travelling shot/dollying shottransitions see cut, dissolves, fade, jump cut, unmatched shots,wipetransparency/transparencetravelling shot see tracking shotUunderground cinemaunmatched shotsxix

List of key conceptsVvampire movies see horror moviesvariation see repetitionvertical integrationviolence see censorship, voyeurism/fetishismvisual pleasure see scopophiliavoyeurism/fetishismWwar filmsWesternswipewomen’s films see melodrama and women’s filmsZzoomxx

Aabsence/presence (see also apparatus) A first definition: cinema makesabsence presence; what is absent is made present. Thus, cinema isabout illusion. It is also about temporal illusion in that the film’snarrative unfolds in the present even though the entire filmic textis prefabricated (the past is made present). Cinema constructs a‘reality’ out of selected images and sounds.This notion of absence/presence applies to character andgender representation within the filmic text and confers a readingon the narrative. For example, an ongoing discourse in a film on acentral character who is actually off-screen implies either a reification(making her or him into an object) or a heroization of that character.Thus, discourses around absent characters played by the youngMarlon Brando, in his 1950s films, position him as object of desire,those around John Wayne as the all-time great American hero. Onthe question of gender-presence, certain genres appear to begender-identified. In the western, women are, to all intents andpurposes, absent. We ‘naturally’ accept this narrative conventionof an exclusively male point of view. But what happens when awestern is centred on a woman, for example Mae West in KlondikeAnnie (Raoul Walsh, 1936) and Joan Crawford in Johnny Guitar(Nicholas Ray, 1954)? Masquerade, mimicry, cross-dressing andgender-bending maybe, but also a transgressive (because it is afemale) point of view – absence made presence.Absence/presence also feeds into nostalgia for former times.This is most clearly exemplified in the viewing of films where thestars are now dead. Obviously, the nostalgia evoked is for differenttypes of ‘realities’ depending on the star yearned after. For example,Marilyn Monroe and James Dean elicit different nostalgia1

absence/presenceresponses from those of Cary Grant and Deborah Kerr. A seconddefinition (see also apparatus, Imaginary/Symbolic,psychoanalysis, suture): film theorists (Baudry, Bellour, Metz,Mulvey (all 1975) making psychoanalytic readings of the dynamicbetween screen and spectator have drawn on Sigmund Freud’sdiscussions of the libido drives and Jacques Lacan’s of the mirrorstage to explain how film works at the unconscious level. The mirrorstage is the moment when the mother holds the child up to themirror and the child imagines an illusory unity with the mother.This is a first moment of identification, with the mother as object.This moment is short-lived, for the child subsequently perceiveseither his difference from or her similarity with the mother. At thispoint the child imagines an illusory identification with the self inthe mirror but then senses the loss of the mother. In Lacanianpsychoanalytic terms this part of the mirror stage is termed theImaginary. The next phase of the mirror stage is termed the Symbolicand can be explained as follows. The child, having sensed the lossof the mother, now desires reunification with her. But this desire issexualized and so the father intervenes. He enters as the third terminto the mirror/reflection, forming a triangle of relationships. Heprohibits access to the mother by saying ‘No’. In this way languagefunctions as the Symbolic order. For the child to become a fullysocialized being/subject, she or he must obey the father’s ‘No’:that is, the ‘Law of the Father’. In so doing, the child enters therealm of language (enters the Symbolic Order): she or he conformsto the Law of the Father which is based in language (the uttered‘No’). The process of socialization for the male child is complete,supposedly, when he finds eventual fulfilment in a female other;the female child, for her part, turns first to her father as object ofdesire and later transfers that desire onto a male other. (For furtherclarification see Imaginary/Symbolic and Oedipal trajectory; andfor a full discussion see Lapsley and Westlake, 1988, 80–90.)By analogy with this psychoanalytic description of the mirrorstage, the screen is defined as the site of the Imaginary: makingabsence presence (bringing into the spectator’s field of visionimages of people or stars who are not in real life present). Thescreen also functions to make presence absence: the spectator isabsent from the screen upon which she or he gazes. However, theinterplay between absence and presence does not end here; if itdid it would end in spectator alienation. Although the spectator isabsent from the screen, she or he becomes presence as the hearing,2

adaptationseeing subject: without that presence the film would have nomeaning. In this respect the screen is seen as having analogieswith the mirror stage. The screen becomes the mirror into which thespectator peers. At first the spectator has a momentaryidentification with that image and sees herself or himself as a unifiedbeing. She or he then perceives her or his difference and becomesaware of the lack, the absence or loss of the mother. Finally, she orhe recognizes herself or himself as perceiving subject. Accordingto this line of analysis, at each film viewing there occurs a reenactment of the unconscious processes involved in the acquisitionof sexual difference (the mirror stage), of language (entry of theSymbolic) and of autonomous selfhood or subjectivity (entry intothe Symbolic order and rupture with the mother as object ofidentification). It is through this interplay of absence/presence thatcinema constructs the spectator as subject of the look andestablishes the desire to look with all that it connotes in terms ofvisual pleasure for the spectator (see gaze). But this visual pleasureis also associated with its opposite: the shame of looking. Absence/presence now functions so as to position the spectator as ‘she orhe who is seeing without being seen’. In this regard, cinema makespossible the re-enactment of the primal scene – that is, accordingto Freud, the moment in a child’s psychological development whenit, unseen, watches its mother and father copulating (seescopophilia, voyeurism/fetishism).A third definition: woman as absence (as object of male desire),man as presence (as perceiving subject). The woman is eternallyfixed as feminine, but not as subject of her own desire. She iseternally fixed and, therefore, mute.For further discussion, see feminist film theory, gaze, scopophilia,spectator-identification.adaptation Literary adaptation to film is a long established tradition incinema starting, for example, with early cinema adaptations of theBible (e.g., the Lumière brothers’ thirteen-scene production of LaVie et passion de Jésus Christ, 1897, and Alice Guy’s La Vie deChrist, 1899). By the 1910s, adaptations of the established literarycanon had become a marketing ploy by which producers andexhibitors could legitimize cinema-going as a venue of ‘taste’ andthus attract the middle classes to their theatres. Literary adaptations3

adaptationgave cinema the respectable cachet of entertainment-as-art. In arelated way, it is noteworthy that literary adaptations haveconsistently been seen to have pedagogical value, that is, teachinga nation (through cinema) about its classics, its literary heritage.Note how in the UK the BBC releases a film, made for screen andsubsequently television viewing, and then issues a teachingpackage (video plus a teacher and student textbook). The choiceof novels adapted has to some extent, therefore, to be seen in thelight of nationalistic ‘value’.A literary adaptation creates a new story, it is not the same asthe original, it takes on a new life, as indeed do the characters.Narrative and characters become independent of the original eventhough both are based – in terms of genesis – on the original. Theadaptation can create stars (in the contemporary UK context, ColinFirth, Pride and Prejudice, 1995, Ewan McGregor, Trainspottiny,1995, Robert Carlyle, The Full Monty, 1997), or stars becomeassociated with that ‘type’ of role (Emma Thompson, HelenaBonham-Carter, Nicole Kidman, Holly Hunter), whereas the novelcreates above all characters we remember and associate with aparticular type of behaviour (e.g. Mrs Bennett, Darcy in Pride andPrejudice). As André Bazin says 1967, 56), film characterizationcreates a whole new mythology ex

Cinema Studies: The Key Concepts This is the essential guide for anyone interested in film. Now in its second edition, the text has been completely revised and expanded to

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.