Effect Of Short-Term Pretrial Practice On Surgical .

3y ago
25 Views
2 Downloads
1.47 MB
14 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ellie Forte
Transcription

Effect of Short-Term Pretrial Practice on SurgicalProficiency in Simulated Environments: A RandomizedTrial of the “Preoperative Warm-Up” EffectKanav Kahol, PhD, Richard M Satava, MD, FACS, John Ferrara, MD, Marshall L Smith, MD, PhDSurgery is a skill-driven discipline. While other high-stake professions with comparable cognitive and psychomotor skill requirements often use warm-up exercises for achieving betterproficiency, the effects of such practice have not been investigated sufficiently in surgical tasks.DESIGN:Subjects performed standardized exercises as a preoperative warm-up, after which the standardized exercises were repeated in a randomized order. In a variation to investigate the generalizability of preoperative warm-up, the experimental group was allowed to warm-up with thestandardized exercises, after which a different task (electrocautery simulation) was performed.To investigate the effect of warm-up on fatigue, participants were involved in eight sessions(four before night call, four after night call), after which the tasks were repeated. Results wereanalyzed using ANOVA to plot differences between warm-up and followup condition.RESULTS:All outcomes measures demonstrated statistically significant improvements after all of thepost warm-up exercises (p 0.01), and were seen in all groups with differing experience levels.In addition, the simple warm-up exercises led to a significant increase in proficiency in followupelectrocautery task for the experimental group when compared with the control group (p 0.0001). There was also significant improvement in performance of the fatigued group toapproximately baseline performance (p 0.05), although they were not able to reach theiroptimal potential performance.CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative warm-up for 15 to 20 minutes with simple surgical exercises leads to a substantialincrease in surgical skills proficiency during followup tasks. (J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:255–268. 2009 by the American College of Surgeons)BACKGROUND:book published by the Stretching Institute2 says: “Warmingup before any physical activity does a number of beneficialthings, but primarily its main purpose is to prepare the bodyand mind for more strenuous activity . . .” it’s importantto start with the easiest and most gentle activity first,building on each part with more energetic activities, untilthe body is at a physical and mental peak. This is the statein which the body is most prepared for the physical activityto come.Although the positive effect of warm-up on strenuousphysical activity is wellknown, research has also shown positive effects of warm-up on cognitive skills3 in physicalsports. Research has also shown that subjects tend to perform better at cognitive exercises in followup tasks. Theoverall effect is seen as a cognitive arousal phenomenon thatenables subjects to more fully concentrate their resourceson the task at hand. As such, cognitive arousal has beenshown to cause increased somatic and cortical activity4 andcan even aid in resisting sleep. The effect of short-termpractice is not limited to sports or physical activity only.High-stake, high-performance professions with substantialThe Oxford English Dictionary defines the term warm-up as“The act or process of ‘warming up’ for a contest, and soforth, by light exercise or practice.”1 More generically,warm-up is “The act or process of raising the temperatureof an engine, electrical appliance, and so forth, to a levelhigh enough for efficient working,”1 which captures theconcept of activating and preparing to a high level of efficiency before beginning an activity. In sports and sportstraining literature, there are several published articles andbooks highlighting the importance of warm-up in improving performance and avoiding errors. The stretching handDisclosure Information: Nothing to disclose.Received April 6, 2008; Revised September 4, 2008.From Department of Biomedical Informatics, Arizona State University,Tempe, AZ (Kahol), Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA (Satava), Phoenix Integrated Surgical Residency,Phoenix, AZ (Ferrara), and Simulation Education and Training Center, Banner Health, Phoenix, AZ (Smith).Correspondence address: Richard M Satava, PhD, University of WashingtonMedical Center, BB430, Box 356410, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA98195-6410. Email: rsatava@u.washington.edu 2009 by the American College of SurgeonsPublished by Elsevier Inc.255ISSN 1072-7515/09/ 36.00doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.029

256Kahol et alPreoperative Warm-Up Effectpsychomotor skills proficiency, such as dancers, musicians,sculptors, and painters, have, for centuries, used short-termpractice or warm-up as a method of getting ready for thetask at hand. A common thread among all activities thatpromote use of warm-up includes strenuous physical activity; strenuous mental activity with requirements of cognitive arousal; and ability to perform both within requiredcoordination and task performance constraints.Although warm-up has a documented positive effect onactivities that involve these requirements, it is also knownto be necessary to avoid deleterious consequences, such asinjury to self and others in the environment and to triggercognitive arousal that can substantially enhance performance ability.Modern-day surgery certainly qualifies as a high-stakes,expertise-driven field.5 The advent of minimally invasivesurgery, although revolutionary for patients and the operating room, poses specific challenges for surgeons and residents. It requires surgeons to perform procedures withhard-to-manipulate tools that impose undesirable constraints on the movements of a surgeon. Although the advent of robotic surgery and more intuitive manipulatorsaddress some of these issues, modern-day surgery, and laparoscopic surgery in particular, still requires considerablecognitive and psychomotor proficiency. There is substantial research that has shown that surgery requires bothstrenuous mental and cognitive activity.6 This raises an important question: if performing an operation involvesstrenuous physical and mental activity, then would a “preoperative warm-up” (or simply “warm-up” for the purposesof this article) activity that involves surgeons performingsurgical exercises before the main task improve surgicalperformance in the main task at hand?Some earlier work has been reported to address a few ofthese issues. Do and colleagues7 used a laparoscopic “boxtrainer” simulator to study the effect of warm-up exerciseson followup tasks. Participants performed a task involvinggrasping pill-like plastic elements from a petri dish andplacing them into a bud vase. Time elapsed to complete thetask and the number of pills successfully transferred to thebud vase were used as measures of performance. Overalllaparoscopic performance was significantly improved forboth residents (all years combined) and the medical student control group (p 0.0001). Although the studyshowed encouraging results of warm-up being used beforeperforming the main exercise, the study had certain limitations because, to a certain extent, it failed to distinguishbetween learning effect and warm-up effect. The increasein proficiency might have occurred because subjects werelearning and adapting to the task. To isolate the effect ofwarm-up on surgical proficiency from the improvement inJ Am Coll Surgpsychomotor activation and cognitive arousal, it is importantto assimilate data across multiple trials with sufficient iterations to allow learning to occur to account for the “learningcurve.” Also, their study did not include sophisticated measures of surgical proficiency, such as hand-movement analysisand tool-movement analysis, which can quantify psychomotor proficiency in detail. In addition, tasks used in their experiment did not include a cognitive dimension, and thereforenot allowing for the study of the effect of warm-up on cognitive arousal. Finally, as the study used the same exercise aswarm-up and followup exercise, it does not sufficiently indicate that the increase in proficiency will carry over to othertasks, especially those with more clinical relevance.This research embarks on defining a systematic methodology to study the effect of short-term pretrial practice onsurgical proficiency. We use simulation tasks targeted tohone both psychomotor and cognitive skills to providewarm-up exercises that will enhance the performance of themain surgical procedures.Several key questions need to be addressed to study theeffect of warm-up on surgical proficiency and present a casefor including preoperative warm-up as an advantageousactivity for surgeons. We have developed a series of interrelated hypotheses that address the issue systematically. Theflowchart in Figure 1 links the hypotheses with the keyquestions and variables they address. The first question thatwe address is whether warm-up does indeed affect the quality of performance in the followup tasks (the classic question of whether training translates to improved outcomes).Experiment 1 aims to establish the effect of warm-upexercises on followup tasks by looking at the global question (Hypothesis 5) and the main individual variables thatcan be the reason for the measured effect. These variablesare experience of the operator, learning, fatigue, and thenature of followup tasks. They are studied through thefollowing hypotheses.Hypothesis 1: Warm-up is not dependent on thelevel of experience of a surgeonThis hypothesis aims to study if the experience level of a surgeon affects warm-up required. It is plausible that warm-upmight only be required for less experienced surgeons or forprocedures a surgeon is not familiar with. In sports, it has beenestablished that warm-up is necessary regardless of the level ofexperience of a player. We aim to investigate the relation between experience and warm-up in surgery.Hypothesis 2: Warm-up and its intensity do notvary with short-term practiceIt could be hypothesized that warm-up is required onlyduring training stages, and once a necessary level of learning has occurred for a particular task, there is no addi-

Vol. 208, No. 2, February 2009Kahol et alPreoperative Warm-Up Effect257Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the experiments.tional requirement for warm-up. In essence, warm-up is“learned” and does not provide benefit after an initial timeframe. To test this hypothesis, experiments that track theperformance of subjects during several sessions are required. It is a priori that no matter how experienced asurgeon might be, there is value added to performing awarm-up before every surgical procedure.Hypothesis 3: Warm-up is effective in reducingerrors resulting from fatigueResearch has shown that fatigue from night call and sleepdeprivation can lead to decreased surgical proficiency.8Whether warm-up would help in alleviating some of theeffects of fatigue is an intriguing question, with many pragmatic and positive implications.Hypothesis 4: Effectiveness of warm-up isindependent of the followup task to be performedFrom a scientific point of view, this is an important investigation that will reveal whether effects produced by generic practice and exercises can carry over to more complex tasks; from apragmatic standpoint, this study will reveal whether a single“standard” warm-up is sufficient or will multiple differenttypes of warm-ups sessions need to be developed.The final investigation lies in studying the nature ofincrease in proficiency.Hypothesis 5: Warm-up affects both cognitive andpsychomotor skillsThe study aims to establish if the increase in proficiency ispurely psychomotor, helping increase dexterity, or does it alsoaffect cognitive abilities of the surgeon. This will be measuredby including both attention and memory tasks, such as highlighting series of pegs for a few seconds, which requires thesubject be attentive enough to locate each peg and then, afterturning off the series, the subject must remember the order ofplacement of the rings (see Methods section).METHODSEarlier approval was obtained by the Institutional ReviewBoard at Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center beforeconducting any experiment.The present study focuses on a series of experimentsdesigned to systematically explore the effect of warm-up.The experimental design extends the methodology proposed by Do and colleagues7 by using exercises in warm-upcondition and followup condition. Subjects across varyingspecialties and experience levels (including senior traumasurgeons) were involved in multiple sessions performingexercises. These sessions were held in both precall and postcall condition, allowing for study of warm-up in alleviatingthe effect of night call on both cognitive and psychomotorfatigue. In an additional experiment, different exercises

258Kahol et alPreoperative Warm-Up EffectJ Am Coll SurgFigure 2. Ring-transfer task implemented using the Sensable Haptic joystick. Simulation requires the participant topick the ring and then place it on the highlighted peg. Movement of the tool and hands are measured in the process.A subject using the system. It should be noted that the hand-movement data-capture gloves can be worn with anysimulator and can potentially be used for evaluation in actual operations.were used for warm-up and followup tasks. This allowedquantification of carry-over effect (generalization) of warm-upexercises. The study design and controls will be discussed insubsequent sections of this article.A series of virtual simulations were developed that measured both psychomotor and cognitive skills in a controlledmanner. A simulation was designed for the virtual ringtransfer task that is a part of validated basic laparoscopiccourse offered by ProMIS Simulator and the AmericanCollege of Surgeons Certified Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery curriculum. In the virtual ring transfer task(see Fig. 2), residents were tasked with grasping a series of“virtual” rings and placing each on randomly highlightedpegs on a board. The simulation was implemented using theSensable haptic joystick, which allows for generation of threedegrees of force feedback in response to events in the virtualenvironment. OpenHL programming applied programminginterface was used to design the simulation. The simulationallows for measurement of the tool tip in the virtual environment. Additionally, while performing the simulated tasks,subjects wore the Cyberglove and Polhemus Liberty Trackerthat allowed for capture of hand movements (see Fig. 2). Thebasic task involved 10 rings. After the participant places a ringon a highlighted peg, another peg is randomly chosen for theparticipant to put the ring on.This is repeated until all 10 ringsare correctly placed. This basic ring transfer task is a psychomotor task used and validated in many simulators to honetool-manipulation skills. A cognitive error is marked for everytime the participant attempts to place a ring on the wrong peg,signifying error in judgment by the subject. It should be notedthat the simulation does not allow placement of a ring on thewrong peg, and the participant is required to continue selecting pegs to put the ring on until the correct peg is chosen.This basic validated laparoscopic exercise was modifiedto include cognitive variations, such as attention, visiospatial tracking, and intermodal transfer. Eight variations ofthe game were designed and are described in detail in Kaholand colleagues9. These newly developed simulations werevalidated through controlled experiments that showed thatthe developed exercises can suitably replicate the realisticwork environment of surgeons, offering exercises thatrequire both psychomotor and cognitive dimensions.Table 1 summarizes the exercises and cognitive modalitythey address. For detailed definitions on the cognitivemodality please see Kahol and colleagues.9Objective proficiency evaluation measuresThis section on methodology defines the hand-movementdata-capture system and variables, and the tool-movementcapture system and variables. For measuring laparoscopicproficiency, we used a combination of hand movement andtool movement. Tool movement measured as movement ofthe tool tip in virtual environment is a validated measurefor surgical proficiency.10 Kahol and colleagues11 introduced hand movement measured through Cyberglove andthe Polhemus Liberty Tracker as an effective measure ofsurgical proficiency. Both tool movement and hand movement are representative of economy of motion, overallsmoothness in execution, and their construct validity hasbeen established. Tool acceleration was calculated for the

Vol. 208, No. 2, February 2009Preoperative Warm-Up EffectKahol et al259Table 1. Exercises and the Primary Cognitive and Psychomotor Faculty EngagedCognitive andpsychomotor facultySensorimotor coordinationWorking memoryMovement planningPreparatory attentionIntermodal ationXXXXentire duration of a task and normalized in a range of 0through 1. Smoothness of tool movement as predictedthrough this measure is 1 when overall acceleration is closeto 0. This is generally the case in well-executed motion withcontrolled accelerations. On the other hand, jerky motionsshow higher normalized acceleration and lower smoothness. The smoothness of tool movement was calculatedusing the following formulas:Tool-movement smoothness 1 normalized (tool acceleration)Hand-movement smoothness(1) 1 normalized (wrist acceleration)(2)The data-capture setup shown in Figure 2 depicts the wirelessCyberglove glove and the Polhemus Liberty tracker. The wristacceleration is calculated through tracking of the sensor placedon the wrist. With regard to tool-movement smoothness,jerky hand motions lead to less smoothness, while controlledmovements lead to increased smoothness. For every simulation exercise, time required to complete a task is recorded;cognitive errors are recorded as the number of times the ring isplaced on the wrong peg. These four objective measures arealso supplemented with gesture-level proficiency measure.Task decomposition has emerged as a validated method tomeasure surgical proficiency.11 In this approach, hand movement or tool movement is decomposed into smaller gestures(such as in, out, grasping and rotation). Each individual gesture is analyzed and, based on its similarity to the optimaloccurrence of a gesture as determined by setting a benchmarkcriteria from an expert group’s performance of that gesture, isgiven a proficiency rating. For this article, hand movementwas used for task decomposition. The algorithm for this purpose was described by Kahol and colleagues11 and was shownto correlate highly with subjective proficiency ratings obtainedby surgeon teachers. The scoring method used is a standardLikert scale between 0 and 10 for an entire exercise. Zeroimplies least proficiency in accomplishing the task and 10implies highest proficiency. This measure is estimated throughcombination of time elapsed and kinematic analysis of handmotion. These five measures (gesture-level proficiency, handmovement smoothness, tool-movement smoothness, timeelapsed, and cognitive errors) provide a broad framework forglobal assessment of haptictransferXXXXXXXXXXXXXXExperimental designTwo experiments were performed. The first experimentconsisted of eight sessions and the second experiment consisted of a single session of data capture. Experiment 1 wasdesigned to evaluate the overall effect of warm-up on surgical proficiency and its relation to experience level, shortterm practice, fatigue level, and cognitive and psychomotorskills. In Experiment 1, every subject acted as their owncontrol, wherein their performance was measured duringwarm-up and then during followup trials. Experiment 2was designed to test if warm-up conducted in basic skillswas able to effect performance in a co

tween experience and warm-up in surgery. Hypothesis 2: Warm-up and its intensity do not vary with short-term practice It could be hypothesized that warm-up is required only during training stages, and once a necessary level of learn-ing has occurred for a particular task, there is no addi-256 Kahol et al Preoperative Warm-Up Effect J Am Coll Surg

Related Documents:

es to specified pretrial release conditions and pretrial practices. The findings of the legal review related to specified pretrial release conditions and pretrial practices are provided below. 'Blanket' Pretrial Release Condition 'Blanket' pretrial release condition is a term used to describe one or more conditions imposed upon

The Virginia Pretrial Services Training and Resource Manual is intended to serve as an instruction manual for new pretrial officers as well as an informative reference for existing staff. The manual contains all of the critical information and resources pretrial officers need to perform their duties as they relate to Pretrial Services.

Pretrial risk assessment tools use actuarial algorithms to assess the likelihood that a person who has been arrested for an offense will fail to appear in court as required or will commit a new offense during the pretrial period. The pretrial risk assessment tools used by the 16 Pretrial Pilot Projects are:

6 Pretrial Decisions Determine Mostly Everything » 2012 statewide study in New Jersey When controlling for legal and extralegal factors (e.g., demographics, offense type, criminal history) Pretrial detention was found to be related to length of incarceration Defendants detained pretrial received significantly longer sentences to incarceration when compared to similarly

10:00 am pretrial-assigned godoy, cassandra monique cr-12099653 attorney: public defender 10:00 am attorney: pretrial-assigned granillo, bianca alicia cr-12069822 10:00 am pretrial-assigned . lopez, francisco angel cr-13003913 . 9:00 am pretrial-assigned luna, .

Santa Clara County engaged in a collaborative process to develop a pretrial risk assessment tool and a pretrial risk assessment system. Yet two aspects of the risk level classifications produced by the tool illustrate potential challenges associated with making informati ve classifications. First, some pretrial misconduct outcomes were rare.

The script at paragraph 2-7-8, PRETRIAL AGREEMENT: ARTICLE 32 WAIVER, may be used, but if the waiver was not IAW a pretrial agreement, the first sentence of the first question should be omitted. If the waiver was part of a pretrial agreement, the MJ may defer this inquiry until discussion of the pretrial agreement at paragraph 2-2-6.

Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1999 The Effects of Pretrial Publicity on Juror Verdicts: A Meta-Analytic Review Nancy Mehrkens Steblay,1,3 Jasmina Besirevic,1 Solomon M. Fulero,2 and Belia Jimenez-Lorente1 The effect of pretrial