An Update In Robotics In Outpatient Rehab

2y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
1.98 MB
55 Pages
Last View : 4d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aiyana Dorn
Transcription

An Update in Robotics inOutpatient RehabKristen Black-Bain PT, DPT, NCS

Objectives Be familiar with various robotic devices forboth upper and lower extremities. Be familiar with current research onvarious robotic devices for both upper andlower extremities. Learn about advances in exoskeletondevelopment

If a robot does “therobot”, is it stillcalled “the robot”?Or just dancing?

Robotics in Rehab– Mobility aids– Manipulation aids– Evaluation tools– Therapeutic aids

LearningIntensityUse it orLose itFeedbackTimeUse it &Improveit

Robotics in Rehab Fewer therapists/staff Active participation with progression Reproducible Mental well being

Lower Extremity Robots

LE RobotsAlter GBionic LegG-EOLokomat Pro

Upper Extremity Robots

UE RobotsARMEO PowerReoGoInMotion ARM

Research Veterans Administration/Department of Defense, regarding UErobotics, “recommend robot-assisted movement therapy as anadjunct to conventional therapy in patients with deficits in armfunction to improve motor skill” (Krebs, 2012). “American Heart Association suggests that robot-assisted therapyfor the UE has achieved Class I level of evidence for stroke care inoutpatient and chronic care setting Class IIa for stroke care ininpatient setting” (Krebs, 2012). Study of 10 chronic SCI (C4-C6) participating in 6 wk studyshowed clinically significant improvements in aim and smoothnessof movement in UE kinematics (Cortes, 2013).

Research RCT; Subacute (30 7 days) stroke patients; showed significantimprovement in Fugl-Meyer, MAS, and PROM after robot-assistedupper limb rehab tx (Sale, 2014).– Control group performing standard therapy also showedsignificant improvement in Fugl-Meyer but experimental grouphad higher improvement Single-blind RCT; children with CP improved significantly inmanual dexterity assessed by Box and Block test compared withcontrol group (Gilliaux, 2015). Single-blind RCT; chronic stroke patients had significantimprovement in task-oriented arm training after six months(Timmermans, 2014)

DeviceFunctionCostFeaturesARMEOIntelligent arm support in3D workspace, 6actuated DOF,augmented feedback,provides objective data 190,000Pediatric option,more degrees offreedomReo-Go3D gyro mechanism;performance feedback,collects objective data 85,000Mobile/easy tomove; lock outspecific motionsInMotion2 active DOF atshoulder; 110,000- ARM andHand.Optional InMotionHand and Wrist forcombinedAdditional 90,000 for coordination ofInMotion Wristmovement.Pediatric option

Hybrid UE Robot Research MAHI-EXO II– Upper extremity exoskeleton– 5 degrees of freedom– Hard stop at elbow– Currently conducting validation studiesfor patients with Stroke and SCIMAHI-EXO II BCI (Brain Computer Interface)– Currently recruiting subacute and chronicstroke T01948739Photo courtesy of www.neurogadget.com

Lower Extremity Exoskeletons

ExoskeletonsReWalkEksoRex

Ekso Formerly called “E-Legs” Wearable bionic suit that enables user to stand and walk overground Battery powered motors move limbs in reciprocal gait pattern Progressing walking modes– Training mode with audio feedback for appropriate weight shifting Variable assist– Various settings thatallow range of passiveto actively assistedstepping from user Bilateral Max Assist Adaptive Assist Fixed AssistPhoto courtesy of www.prescouter.com

Research Clinical trials out of Kessler showing positive results from training withEkso exoskeleton (presented at ASCIP 2012, 2014 conference by GailForrest, PhD)– Increased oxygen consumption, ventilation, and heart rate showingpotential cardiovascular benefit– Increased muscle firing in lower leg muscles during Ekso assistedwalking– Increase gait speed and decreased stance time on single limb withincreased training– Increased loading on LEs

Research Clinical trials out of Mount Sinai (presented at ASCIP 2014 by AllanKozlowski, PT)– Ekso walking is safe (no adverse events occurred)– Level of assistance varies– HR, RPE, METs comparable to light exercise– Secondary benefits: reports of improved pain, spasticity, posture,sleep, and bowel function– Psychosocial benefits

Rex Bionics Hands free, self supported device controlled by joystick Can be used by people with cervical injuriesas high as C-4 Can navigate up/down stairs and rampsRehab and personal units available (UK only) Fast adjustabilityUpdate: Clinical trials starting in early 2015 Goal is to secure pre-market notification, 501(k)from FDA by end of second quarter of 2016leading to at-home use late 2016.Photo courtesy of www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk

ReWalk Stepping is controlled by wt shifting and subtle trunk movements thattrigger tilt sensors Adjustability for varying levels of user (beginner – advanced)– Joint range, step speed, delay between steps, tilt angle, currentthreshold Battery held in backpack Able to ascend/descend stairs Used with forearm crutches Mode is determined by watchcontroller worn by userPhoto courtesy of www.medicalplasticnews.comOnly FDA approved device in US for personal use

Research 6 Chronic SCI volunteer participants with thoracic level (T5- T12)complete injuries participated in average 13 training sessions didnot show any increase in pain or adverse effects (Esquenazi, 2012)– One participant with chronic high-level neuropathic pain (VAS 8-9)showed repeated improvement after training (VAS 4-6). In a nonrandomized single intervention trial, 12 subjects withchronic thoracic level (T3-T12) motor complete SCI reportedpositive emotional/psychological benefits on survey (Zeilig, 2012)– 3/11 reported improved spasticity, 0/11 reported increase in pain, 5/11reported improved bowel regulation

Research Improved bowel function in 5 motor complete SCI participating in15-20 sessions of ReWalk exoskeleton training (Fineberg, 2012)– Decreased average time of evacuation– reduction of dependency for manual stimulation, laxatives, or stoolsofteners Early data out of Bronx VA (Ann Spungen, presented at ASCIP2014); 7 ReWalk users walking 1-2 hours 3 days a week– Improved skill level (decreased assistance, varied terrain outdoors, communitymobility)– potential positive lean tissue mass changes in users with lower motor partialzones of preservation– No changes in bone mineral density– Loss of fat mass– Report of significant improvement in bowel function– Increased energy expenditure but sustainable– Improved QOL

Case Report Female 27 years old; Chronic T-10 AIS-C SCI, 10 years post injury Goal: to walk around home with braces (KAFO/AFO) Previously attempted ambulation with braces and FWW– Subjective report: required assistance, relied heavily on UEsallowing only 5-10 ft of gait with FWW Measurements before ReWalk training– TUG: 52 sec; wearing R KAFO and L AFO in parallel bars– LE MMT R hip flex 4-/5L hip flex 4 /5 R hip ext 2-/5L hip ext 3-/5 R knee ext 3-/5L knee ext 5/5 R knee flex 2/5L knee flex 3/5– Pain: daily nerve pain in B LEs L R, worst 9/10 on VAS

Case Report Intervention– 2-3 days/ week X 6 weeks 15 sessions total; 11 ReWalk, 4 gait training with bracesstarted after first 3 weeks Measurements after 6 weeks– TUG: 23.72 sec (52.36 sec)– Ambulate 77 (5-10) ft with FWW– LE MMT R hip flex 4-/5 (4-)L hip flex 4 /5 (4 ) R hip ext 2 /5 (2-)L hip ext 3-/5 (3-) R knee ext 3/5 (3-)L knee ext 5/5 R knee flex 2/5 (2)L knee flex 3 /5 (3) Pain: daily nerve pain in B LEs; worst 8/10 VAS (9/10)

“When using the ReWalk I could feel myabs starting to work and I hadn’t felt thatbefore.”“Using it definitely helped with my sittingbalance”.“Using the ReWalk has helped my trunk toget stronger with other things I do”.

Hybrid-ExoskeletonsIndegoHALKinesis/H2

H2-Exo / Kinesis Exoskeleton developed by Technaid out of Spain Bilateral lower extremity equipped with activeactuators at knee hinges– Passive elastic actuators at ankles EMS: PC controlled stimulator deliversbiphasic current to knee ext/flex Can manually trigger steps Wearer uses walker for UE support

Research Pilot study; 3 motor incomplete SCI using FES hybridexoskeleton– able to complete 6 minutes of walking after one day (Del Ama,May 2014)– After only one week of training, improved gait measures (10mand 6MWT), but also continued to improved one week afterintervention. HYPER project– Recruiting for clinical trial: Subacute or chronic stroke patients– https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02114450

H2-Exo

Cyberdyne HAL Hybrid-Assistive-Limb “World’s First Cyborg type robot thatinterfaces man, machine, and information” Assistance triggered by EMGfrom surface electrodes Single LE, Bilateral LE, or whole bodyUE/LE combo Currently only in Japan and Germany Submitted application for FDAclearance in U.S.Photo courtesy of www.cyberdyne.jp

Research After 16 training sessions, patients with variousneurological diagnoses (Stroke, SCI) improved gaitspeed, number of steps, and cadence (Kubota, 2013). HAL was found to be safe when used for gait training inacute stroke patients (Nilsson, 2014)– All 7 participants improved gait measured by 10MWT

Indego Lightweight at only 27 lbsBreaks down to smaller pieces for easy travel/transportationFunctional electrical stimulation componentAdapts to user input with varying levels ofpower provided Requires use of AFO to be worn with devicePhoto courtesy of www.mdtmag.com

Indego Slim profile that allows sitting in most standard wheelchairs Wireless operation through appon mobile device Single handed strapping Not yet approved by FDA Commercial release expectedin 2016 in USPhotos courtesy of www.indego.com

Research Single subject case study showed exoskeleton poweredlocomotion to have faster gait speed and also reducedexertion compared with KAFO use (Farris, 2013). Single subject case study with T10 complete SCI usingexoskeleton combined with FES showed 34% reductionin electrical power required at hip joints during stancephase of gait (Ha, 2012)

Research Preliminary data presented at ASCIP 2014––––Potential for multiple dxs (SCI, CVA, TBI, MS, etc)Easy to learn for staff and family/caregiversSelf report of reduced spasticity during and up to 4 hrs afterReduced pain and time for bowel care Recruiting for multi center clinical trial– https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02202538

DeviceFunctionEksoCan balance indep, Sit to Rehab Unit: approxstand, gait, progressing 150,000level of independencesettingsCurrently onlyrehab unitavailable.IndigoE-stim, sit to stand, gait,stair climbingProjected estimate:approx- 30,000Expecting FDAapproval 2016HAL,CyberdyneSit to stand, gait, upperand lower limbassistance,Facility contract rentalagreement: 5000initial then approx 1400- 1600 per moJapan andGermany, hasapplied for FDAapproval in USReWalkSit to stand, gait,direction change, stairclimbingRehab Unit: approx 85,000Currently rehabunit available.Personal Unit:projected approx 65,000Available forpurchase. VA hascovered one P unitBoth rehab andpersonal units: 150,000Rehab unit availworldwide;Personal- UKRex BionicsSit to stand, gait, stairs,ramps up/down, noassistive deviceCostAvailability

3D PrintingPhoto courtesy of www.dezeen.com

MindWalker ProjectPhoto courtesy of www.damngeeky.com

Walk Again

Criteria for Exoskeleton use Healthy weight Range of motion within normal limits Orthopedically stable Upright tolerance Device specific requirementsContraindications:- fractures, uncontrolled spasticity, pregnancy, skin breakdown, DVT,low blood pressure, psychiatric/cognitive issues, contractures

Good Physical Health is the Key!!

Considerations when choosing a device Patient populationCostHow will it be used/ ReimbursementThe company providing and manufacturing the device.Space/ceiling height in your facility

LearningIntensityUse it orLose itFeedbackTimeUse it &Improveit

Be Creative !Think outside the box!

REFERENCES: Bishop L, Stein J, Wong CK. Robot-aided gait training in an individual with chronic spinal cord injury: acase study. JNPT. 2012;36: (138-143).Byl NN. Mobility training using a bionic knee orthosis in patient in a post-stroke chronic state: a caseseries. Journ of Medical case report. 2012; 6:216.Cortes M, et al. Improved motor performance in chronic spinal cord injury following upper-limb robotictraining. Neuro Rehabil. 2013; 33 (57-65).del-Ama AJ, Gil-Agudo A, Pons JL, Morena JC. Hybrid FES-robot cooperative control of ambulatory gaitrehabilitation exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Mar 4; 11:27.del-Ama AJ, Gil-Agudo A, Pons JL, Moreno JC. Hybrid gait training with an overground robot for peoplewith incomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 13; 8:298.Esquenazi A, Packel A. Robotic-Assisted gait training and restoration. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012; 91(Suppl), 217-231.Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, Saulino M; The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatoryfunction to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am Journ Phys Med Reh.2012 Nov; 91: 11 (911-21).Farris R, et al. A preliminary assessment of legged mobility provided by a lower limb exoskeleton forpersons with paraplegia. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013; 18.Fineberg DB, et al. Improvements in bowel function in paraplegics using ReWalk for overgroundambulation. Poster presentation. Academy of spinal cord injury professionals. Annual conference 2012.Fineberg DB, Asselin P, Harel NY, Agranova-Breyter I, Kornfeld SD, Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Verticalground reaction force-based analysis of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in persons with motorcomplete paraplegia. Journ Spinal Cord Med. 2013, 36:4, 313-321.Gilliaux M, Renders A, Dispa D, Holvoet D, Sapin J, Dehez B, et al. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy incerebral palsy: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Feb; 29(2):183-92.

Ha KH, Quintero HA, Farris RJ, Goldfarb M. Enhancing stance phase propulsion during level walking bycombining FES with a powered exoskeleton for persons with paraplegia. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:344-7.Herr H. Exoskeletons and orthoses: classification, design challenges and future directions. Journ ofNeuroEng and Rehab. 2009, 6:21.Hesse S, Werner C, Bardeleben A. Electromechanical gait training with functional electrical stimulation:case studies in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004.Hesse S, Waldner A, Tomelleri C. Innovative robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stairclimbing up and down in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Jun. 7:30.Hidler J, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat insubacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23(1), 5-13.Hornby TG, et al. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotortraining in subjects with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008; 39(6), 1768-92.Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotic therapy: the tipping point. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov. 91: 11 03,(S290-S297).Kubota S, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patientswith limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun. 94: 6 (1080-7).Mayr A, Kofler M, Qirbach E, et al. Prospective, blinded, randomized crossover study of gaitrehabilitation in stroke patients using the Lokomat gait orthosis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:307-14.McCabe J, Monkiewicz M, Holcomb J, Pundik S, Daly JJ; Comparison of Robotics, FES, and MotorLearning Methods for Treatment of Persisten Upper Extremity Dusfunction after Stroke: a RandomizedControlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Nove 15.Nilsson A, Vreede KS, Haglund V, Kawamoto H, Sankai Y, Borg J. Gait training early after stroke with anew exoskeleton- the hybrid assistive limb: a study of safety and feasibility. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014June 2; 11:92.

Nooijen CF, et al. Gait quality is improved by locomotor training in idividuals with SCI regardless oftraining approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 6:36.Norouzi-Gheidari N, et al. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs:systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. JRRD. 2012; 49:4 (479-496).Sale P, et al. Robot-assisted walking training for individuals with Parkinson’s disease: a pilot randomizedcontrolled trial. BMC Neurol. 2013; 13: 50.Sale P, Franceschini M, Mazzoleni S, Palma E, Agosti M, Posteraro F. Effects of upper limb robotassisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Journ Neuroeng and Rehabil. 2014,11:104.Talaty M, Esquenazi A. Differentiating ability in users of the rewalk powered exoskeleton. IEEE Int ConfRehabil Robot. Jun, 2013; 1-5.Tefertiller C. et al. Efficacy of rehabilitation robotics for walking training in neurological disorders: Areview. Journ Rehabil Res & Dev. 2011; 48: 387-416.Timmermas AA, Lemmens RJ, Monfrance M, Geers RP, Bakx W, Seelen HA. Effects of task-orientedrobot training on arm function, activity, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients: a randomizedcontrolled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Mar 31;11:45.Toyo Keizai. Cyberdyne Inc.- the robot suit obtains certification in Europe. Translated from UeraburuTanmatsu mo Zokuzoku Tojo- Donaru Nihon no Denshibuhin. Weekly, Sept 2013: 54-57.Westlake KP, Patten C. Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotorrecovery post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009; 6:18.Wirz M, et al. Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinalcord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:4, 672-80.Wong CK, Bishop L, Stein J. A wearable robotic knee orthosis for gait training; a case-series ofhemiparetic stroke survivors. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36(1):113-120.Zeilig G, et al. Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people withcomplete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Journ of Spin Cord Med. 2012; 35:2.

agreement: 5000 initial then approx- 1400- 1600 per mo Japan and Germany, has applied for FDA approval in US ReWalk Sit to stand, gait, direction change, stair climbing Rehab Unit: approx- 85,000 Personal Unit: projected approx- 65,000 Currently rehab unit ava

Related Documents:

The Future of Robotics 269 22.1 Space Robotics 273 22.2 Surgical Robotics 274 22.3 Self-Reconfigurable Robotics 276 22.4 Humanoid Robotics 277 22.5 Social Robotics and Human-Robot Interaction 278 22.6 Service, Assistive and Rehabilitation Robotics 280 22.7 Educational Robotics 283

The VEX Robotics Game Design Committee, comprised of members from the Robotics Education & Competition Foundation, Robomatter, DWAB Technolog y , and VEX Robotics. VEX Robotics Competition Turning Point: A Primer VEX Robotics Competition Turning Point is played on a 12 ft x 12 ft foam-mat, surrounded by a sheet-metal and polycarbonate perimeter.

The VEX Robotics Game Design Committee, comprised of members from the Robotics Education & Competition Foundation, Robomatter, DWAB Technologi es, and VEX Robotics. VEX Robotics Competition In the Zone: A Primer VEX Robotics Competition In the Zone is played on a 12 ft x 12 ft foam-mat, surrounded by a sheet-metal and lexan perimeter.

robotics.Illinois.edu/education ECE470/ME445/AE482 Introduction to Robotics ECE489/ME446/SE422 Robot Dynamics & Control ECE550 Robot Planning ABE424 Principles of Mobile Robotics CS 498 Robot Manipulation & Planning SE598 Soft Robotics ECE598 Humanoid Robotics ECE484 Principles of Safe Autonomy ECE313 (or equivalent) Intro to

Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics / edited by Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey. p. cm.-(Intelligent robotics and autonomous agents series) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978--262-01666-7 (hardcover: alk. paper) 1. Robotics-Human factors. 2. Robotics Moral and ethical aspects. 3.

Robotics & Spatial Systems Laboratory Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, Florida 32901 gsellin@my.fit.edu, pierrel@fit.edu ABSTRACT This article presents the future work for an internship in the Robotics and Spatial Systems Laboratory (RASSL). This work is different from robotics lessons because it is a practical work. It

Technology series. Emerging technologies. The Essential . Eight technologies . Board byte: robotics. Robotics are changing the way companies do business. What should boards know? Companies across all industries are using, investing in or planning to invest . in robotics. As the robotics market grows, boards should understand whether and how .

Silicon Valley Robotics was launched in January 2010 by a coalition of 30 robotics companies that included founding board members Adept, Bosch, SRI International and Willow Garage. Rich Mahoney, Director of Robotics at SRI International is the Founding President of the association. Andra Keay is the Managing Director, in charge of daily operation.