ATEC Overview And The AEC Logistics Mission - WordPress
ATEC Overviewand theAEC Logistics MissionBrian M. SimmonsDirector, US ArmyEvaluation Center23 January 2008Presentation to SOLEAberdeen Proving Ground MD
Agenda ATEC Mission & Roles in Acquisition Army Evaluation Center Organization Regulatory Requirements Traditional Test and Evaluation Supporting an Army at War AEC Logistics Evaluation Mission2
ATEC Mission Plan, conduct, and report the results of tests,simulations, experiments, and evaluations toAcquisition decision makers in order to ensure ourArmy’s Warfighters have the right capabilities forsuccess across the entire spectrum of operations. Conduct rapid testing in direct support of theGWOT warfighter in order to provide capabilitiesand limitations of untested weapon systems issueddirectly to Soldiers conducting combat operations(Iraq/Afghanistan).3
How ATEC FitsSecretary ofDefenseDirector, OperationalTest & EvaluationUnder Secretary ofDefense(Acquisition,Technology,and Logistics), DirectorDefense Systems/DDDevelopmental T&EDeputy UnderSecretary of theArmySecretaryof theArmyArmy T&EOfficeChief of StaffAssist Secretary forAcquisition, Logisticsand TechnologyIndependentReportingMandated by USCode, OMB &OSDVice Chiefof StaffDirector of theArmy StaffArmy Test andEvaluationCommandDevelopmentalTest CommandBG Frank TurnerMG Roger NadeauOperational TestCommandCOL(P) Curtis PottsArmy EvaluationCenterMr Brian Simmons4
How ATEC FitsSecretary ofDefenseDirector, OperationalTest & EvaluationUnder Secretary ofDefense(Acquisition,Technology,and Logistics), DirectorDefense Systems/DDDevelopmental T&EDeputy UnderSecretary of theArmySecretaryof theArmyArmy T&EOfficeChief of StaffAssist Secretary forAcquisition, Logisticsand TechnologyIndependentReportingMandated by USCode, OMB &OSDVice Chiefof StaffDirector of theArmy StaffArmy Test andEvaluationCommandDevelopmentalTest CommandBG Frank TurnerMission: ATEC plans, conducts andintegrates developmental testing,independent operational testing,independent evaluations,assessments and experiments inorder to provide essential informationto decision makers and Warfighters.MG Roger NadeauOperational TestCommandCOL(P) Curtis PottsArmy EvaluationCenterMr Brian Simmons4
COLOR KEYAEC OrganizationAEC DirectorMr. Brian M. SimmonsTechnicalDirectorMr. ApicellaCombatSupportEvaluationDirectorateCOL WilhelmBallistic MissileDefenseEvaluationDirectorateCOL LambertFuture ForceEvaluationDirectorateCOL FreelonAPG, MDALEX. VA & APG MDHUNTSVILLE, ALChief OfStaffCOL BurkeLean Six SigmaDivisionMs. MeiroseAviationEvaluationDirectorateCOL KellyALEXANDRIA, VAResourceManagementDivisionMr. ZacharczykCounter - IEDEvaluationDirectorateMr. MoosmannTech SupportEvaluationDirectorateMr. BurrowsCG ATEC(Chair JTB)MG NadeauOperationsDivisionMr. HubbellIntelligenceEvaluationDirectorateCOL StewartIntegrated LogSupportEvaluationDirectorateMr. AmatoHumanResourcesDivisionMs. TredwayClose CombatEvaluationDirectorateMr. MartinReliability &MaintainabilityEvaluationDirectorateMr. YuhasNet FiresEvaluationDirectorateMr. JohnsonCommand,Control &CommunicationsEvaluationDirectorateCOL WilliamsJoint TestBoard(Director)Mr. HughesSurvivabilityEvaluationDirectorateMr.5 Laughman
Where We AreATECATEC manages1/3 Army’s LandDTCAECDugwayProving GroundAlexandriaYumaProving GroundFort HuachucaWhite SandsMissile RangeFort SillOTCAberdeenFortBraggRedstoneArsenalFort RuckerFort BlissFortsWainwright& GreelyFort HoodPanama & HawaiiTropics Test CentersLegendHeadquartersMajor Test FacilityOperational Test Dir6
DoD 5000 Series / ArmyRegulationsBe separate andindependentTo EvaluateDirects ATEC:Effectiveness Suitability Survivability Report directly toService Chief7
Operational Testing Synchsthe Army ARMY STAFF ASAALT TRADOC AMC8
Testing for TraditionalAcquisitionWeatherObscurants &InterferentsChem/BioAgentONLY Servicewith IntegratedDT/OTC4I/DigitizationVirtual FeaturesVirtual RangeIndividual & CollectiveProtection & SurvivabilityModeling and GYLive FireEffectiveFull Spectrumof TestingDevelopmental TestOperational TestSystemEvaluationReportSuitableSurvivable9
T&E Supporting anArmy at WarET&ortfesquStreamlinedT&E ConceptTestingReportingTest-Fix-TestRe JIEDDOPMRDEC’sREFUsers in TheaterSafetyConfirmationField UseFOAUpdateReport(CLR)UpdateReport(CLR)Fixes inhours anddays!T&E ConceptFixTestCapabilities &Limitations10Report (CLR)
The T&E PendulumRapid Equipping Quick, overlappingHigher RiskOpportunistic / Ad hocLess bureaucratic & little oversightIncomplete Data–Constrained DT–Limited OT–C&L Report to User Cheap to Community –Expensive to ATEC11
Integrated Logistics SupportEvaluation Directorate: 2 Missions1. Evaluate the supportability of a system andits impact on overall he degree to which a system can be satisfactorily placed in field use, withconsideration to transportability, interoperability, reliability, wartime usagerates, maintainability, safety, human factors, manpower supportability,logistics supportability, documentation, and training requirements.2. Perform independent logistics supportabilityassessments and report them to ASA(ALT)“Logistics cannot win a war, but itsabsence or inadequacy can causedefeat.”Operating and Support Costsaccount for over 2/3 of a weapon12system’s life cycle cost
Logistics & MANPRINT PrinciplesILSLogisticsMANPRINTPBLKey PerformanceParametersILS1 Design Influence2 Maintenance Planning3 Supply Support4 Support and Test Equipment5 Manpower and Personnel6 Training7 Technical Data8 Facilities9 Computer Resources Support10 Packaging, Handling Storage,& TransportabilityMANPRINT1234567Human Factors EngineeringManpowerPersonnelTrainingSafetyHealth HazardsSoldier Survivability13
ILS EVENTS & DATA SOURCESStructuredTest DT/OT Test Incident Reports Questionnaires Tester Observations MANPRINT Analysis ConferencesData Voids From DT/OTLOGISTICS/MANPRINTFilled viaDEMONSTRATIONLog Demo & ModelingControl % of tasks relative to the MACTransportation & transportabilityTechnical manualsManpower and personnelDesign influence (BIT/BITE, R&M, MANPRINT,transportability, safety, etc.)MODELINGSupport and test equipment Level-of-repair analysis (COMPASS)Packing, handling and storage- Maintenance tasksHuman Factors/Safety/Training- Cost comparison Provisioning Analysis (SESAME)- Supply support- Operational availability 14- Cost comparison
Rapid Fielding SupportILSED: Focus Areas Training Tech Manuals for operation and maintenance Supportability concepts/ CLS plan Field Service Reps: locations & procedures Depot/FOB support for HW and SW Spares Management Security Considerations Packaging, Handling, Storage Safety HFE15
Logistics Initiatives- Army -InitiativeSummaryWhat AEC can doPerformanceBased LogisticsProgram Managers use PBL to: Buy results rather than productsor services. Provide the “Best Value”support concept Relate evaluations to applicablemeasures of PBL. Relate logistics findings toeffectiveness and efficiencyof achieving mission success.ASA ALT Memo2 January 08(Prototyping& Competition)ASA ALT Memo6 December 07(Reliability)Acquisition Strategy Report will: Evaluate competing prototypesfor the earliest acquisition milestone Document the prototyping strategyand resulting technical maturity Prepared to test and reportcapabilities and maturity ofearly prototypesProgram Managers will (Very Early): Establish early reliability test thresholds Incorporate the thresholds into contracts Detect and report threshold breaches Evaluate reliability in T&E programsearlier Report logistics burdens (and costs)of off-target reliability earlierJCIDS Joint Capabilities IntegrationDevelopment System AEC chairs an Army-levelworking group to standardizelogistics requirements fordeveloping programsCLOE Common LogisticsOperating Environment Developed a PM’s web-based guide toNet-Centric CLOE to16standardize Armynetwork architectures and data formats.
Logistics Initiatives- AEC -Operability (as a Measure)(BRASS)Used in Future Combat Systems. The amountof functional capability which is available to amilitary commander(Battle Ready and Sufficiently Supported)Logistics FootprintEvaluationDoes the system incur logistics burdensbeyond the current capacity of gaining command?(requiring added support/materiel/manpower)Cognitive WorkloadEvaluationAre the Unit’s and Soldier’s jobs stillwithin manageable mental workload levels?Modeling & SimulationExtrapolates support and mission resultsover large organizations17
SummaryThe Army recognizes the criticality of fieldinglogistically supportable materiel, and is takinginitiatives towards ensuring better supportability.AEC has the mission to evaluate thatsupportability for new systems, whethertraditional acquisitions or in rapid acquisitionprograms – and has taken the lead to bringabout the Army’s goal via thorough logisticsevaluations of Army development programs.18
Traditional Evaluation ProcessAECLens Chartchart removThisDTLFRLogESR OECERTEXStrategyATECSA/SERTestReportsOTSEPst hour.t the laaniotatnesed from RACTRADOCASA- FMMDAG1, 4DOTEAnyDecisioEvaluation Reportingn
Lean Six Sigma Division Ms. Meirose COLOR KEY. 6 Where We Are Redstone Arsenal Fort Rucker Fort Huachuca Fort Hood Fort Sill Alexandria Yuma Proving Ground Dugway Proving Ground . logistics supportability, documentation, and training requirements. “Logistics cannot win a war, but its
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
AEC is modified to AEC I. The AEC 2 is an enhanced continuation with the delivery of approximately 50% practical tasks and half (50%) theory. The AEC part I and part II will be termed as the full AEC. The scope of these guidelines is limited to AEC 1 only. 5.2 Centres will need to develop a traini
Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được
AEC - Q100-012 - Rev-: Short Circuit Reliability Characterization of Smart Power Devices for 12V Systems AEC-Q104 (New) Additional Standards AEC - Q101 Rev - D1: Failure Mechanism Based Stress Test Qualification For Discrete Semiconductors (base document) AEC - Q101-001 - Rev-A: Human Body Model (HBM) Electrostatic Discharge Test
